surgeon led biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours

19
Surgeon led biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours Robert U. Ashford Stanley W. McCarthy S. Fiona Bonar Richard A. Scolyer Rooshdiya Z. Karim Paul D. Stalley NSW Bone & Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service

Upload: kaye-cameron

Post on 01-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Surgeon led biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours. Robert U. Ashford Stanley W. McCarthy S. Fiona BonarRichard A. Scolyer Rooshdiya Z. KarimPaul D. Stalley NSW Bone & Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service. “Poorly performed biopsies compromise limb salvage surgery and patient survival”. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Surgeon led biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours

Robert U. Ashford Stanley W. McCarthy

S. Fiona Bonar Richard A. Scolyer

Rooshdiya Z. Karim Paul D. Stalley

NSW Bone & Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service

“Poorly performed biopsies compromise limb salvage

surgery and patient survival”Mankin JBJS 1982

Biopsy of Musculoskeletal Tumours• Tertiary Centre is best & core biopsy preferred

• Fraught with complications– Mankin (1982 & 1986) :– 23% error rate– 17% complication rate– 5% amputation rate because of biopsy

• Our experience– Pollock & Stalley 2004– 38% of biopsies performed elsewhere hindered Rx– 17% amputation rate

Biopsy of Suspicious Lesions

• CT guided biopsy for all ?– 127 Biopsies– 20% non-correlation rate (25 patients)– 10 Non-diagnostic CT Bx (6/10 malignant)– 1 Major error: CT Bx – Schwannoma ; Excision

- synovial sarcoma

Altuntas et al (2004): ANZ J SurgAltuntas et al (2004): ANZ J Surg

Sydney to Venice

16304 km

DistanceSydney to

Albury 560km Bega 420km Bourke 775km Broken Hill 1159km Coffs Harbour 572km Dubbo 407km Grafton 618km Wagga 470km

London to Venice 1139 kmLondon to Geneva 740 kmNew York to Washington 328 kmToronto to New York 831 km

RPAH Protocol

1. MDT Sarcoma Clinic Assessment

2. Completion of imaging

3. Biopsy 1. Surgeon (Consultant / Fellow)

2. GA

3. Core Biopsy (Trucut)

4. Frozen Section with surgeon present

5. Repeat Biopsy Core or open if 4 not representative

Study

• Retrospective review of all biopsies performed at RPAH under the care of the senior author for 2 years (July 2003 – June 2005)

• Comparison of core, core proceed to open and open biopsies

• Analysis of accuracy and non-diagnostic rates

• Comparison with CT core biopsies from literature

Biopsy Technique

Biopsy Method Number Percentage

Trucut Core 93 34.3%

Core proceed to open 11 4.1%

CT Core 24 8.9%

Open (Incisional, Curetting)

76 28.0%

Excisional 58 21.4%

Reamings 9 3.3%

Total 271 100%

Bone TumoursMalignant Benign

Osteosarcoma 24 GCT 7

Chondrosarcoma 9 Infection 4

MFH 7 ABC 3

Lymphoma 8 Haemangioma 3

Myeloma 7 EG 2

Ewing’s 2 Ganglion Cyst 2

Chordoma 1 CMF 1

Synovial Sarcoma 1 Paget’s 1

NHL 1 Osteoid Osteoma 1

Metastases 11

Total 71 Total 24

Soft Tissue Tumours

Malignant Benign

MFH 8 Desmoid Fibromatosis 3

Leiomyosarcoma 4 Fibroma 3

Synovial Sarcoma 3 Schwannoma 2

Liposarcoma 1 Myxoma 2

Fibromyxoid sarcoma 1 Synovial Chondromatosis

1

Fibrosarcoma 1 Neuroma 1

Myofibrosarcoma 1 Haemangiopericytoma 1

Rhabdomyosarcoma 1

Total 20 Total 13

Results

• 104 protocol biopsies

• No non-diagnostic biopsies

• 11/104 (10.6%) necessary to proceed to open biopsy– 27% of ultimately benign lesions– 23% of soft tissue lesions

AccuracyN Diagnostic Errors Accuracy

Bone Lesions

Core 66 66 0 100%

C / O 3 3 0 100%

CT 21 21 0 100%

Soft Tissue Lesions

Core 27 27 0 100%

C/O 8 8 1 87.5%

CT 3 3 0 100%

One Error

• 62 Female with thigh mass

• Non-diagnostic imaging

• F/S diagnosis: lymphoid tissue favour Hodgkin’s Disease

• Final diagnosis: B cell lymphoma

• No alteration in surgical management

Discussion

• Tertiary centre is best

• Core biopsy is often appropriate

• Adding frozen section eradicates risk of non-diagnostic biopsy

• Open biopsy if core non-diagnostic

• A good pathologist is obligatory

Before doing a biopsy …….. think