surgical options knee nrrheum
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
1/45
reviews
Surgical options for patients withosteoarthritis of the kneeJörg Lützner, Philip Kasten, Klaus-Peter Günther and Stephan Kirschner
abstract | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a progressive disease that ultimately damages the entire joint.nee OA should initially be treated conservatively! but surgery should be considered if symptoms persist.
surgical treatments for knee OA include arthroscopy! osteotomy and knee arthroplasty" determining which ofthese procedures is most appropriate will depend on several factors! including the location and severity of OAdamage! patient characteristics and risk factors. Arthroscopic lavage and debridement do not alter disease progression! and should not be used as a routine treatment for the osteoarthritic knee. #one marrowstimulation techni$ues such as microfracture are primarily used to treat focal chondral defects" the evidence forthe use of these techni$ues for knee OA remains unclear. %he goal of osteotomy for unicompartmental knee OAis to transfer the weight load from the damaged compartment to undamaged areas! delaying the need for joint
replacement. %his procedure should be considered in young and active patients who are not suitable candidatesfor knee arthroplasty. &or patients with severe OA! total knee arthroplasty can be a safe! rewarding and cost'effective treatment. in selected patients with isolated medial or patellofemoral OA! unicompartmental kneearthroplasty and patellofemoral replacement! respectively! can be successful.
t*ner! +. et al. Nat. Rev. Rheumat l. ,! - /0-12 (3 /)" doi41 .1 -56nrrheum.3 /.55
7ntroductionosteoarthritis (oa) of the knee (Figure 1) is a progres-sive diseasethat ultimately damages the entire joint. Knee oa is a commondisease that has an increased inci-dence and prevalence in peopleover the age of 40 years around 10! of all people older than "0years of age have radiological signs of knee oa# and a$out half of
those complain of clinical symptoms. 1 musculoskeletal diseases# andespecially oa# are common causes of dis-a$ility and limitations toactivities of daily living and %ork. the direct cost of oa in the us isestimated at &'1 $illion per year# %ith a further &4 $illion inindirect costs# including lost %ages and productivity. 1 * initialtreatment of knee oa is conservative# and includes edu-cationalinformation# physical therapy# regular e+ercise# %eight reduction# theuse of acetaminophen (paraceta-mol) and,or nsai s and intra-articular injections of corticosteroids or hyaluronate. "# if symptoms
persist after the appropriate use of nonsurgical treatment# ho%ever#surgery can $e recommended. " this revie% outlines the surgical
procedures availa$le to treat knee oa at various stages and inconsideration of patient-related factors# such as age# level of physicalactivity and risk factors.
8ompeting interests+. t*ner declares associations with the following companies4 Aesculap!stryker. 9. asten declares associations with the following companies4#iosafe! %ornier. '9. : nther declares associations with the followingcompanies4 stryker! ;immer. s. irschner declares associations with thefollowingcompanies4 Aesculap! stryker! ;immer. see the article online for full detailsof the relationships.
Arthroscopic surgeryarthroscopy is %idely usedin the treatment of oa#despite the lack of evidence sho%ing it tohave greater $enefit thanother treatments. '# the
different arthroscopictechni/ues include lavage#de$ridement# $one marro%stimulation of containedchondral lesions#osteochondraltransplantation# andautologous chondrocytetransplanta-tion. asautologousosteochondral 10 andchondrocytetransplantation 11#1 are not
indicated for knee oa# %e%ill not discuss them inthis revie%. most
pu$lished studies of arthroscopic proceduresfor knee oa (ta$le 1) are of limited /uality# o%ing tolack of randomi ation#lack of a control group#short-term follo%- up# or inconsistent assessmentmethods. 12 only threerandomi ed trials have
compared arthroscopicsurgery %ith a nonsurgicalcontrol procedure for kneeoa. '# #14
lavage anddebridementthe rationale for arthroscopic lavage is to%ash out de$ris andinflammatory en ymes#conse/uently reducing
symptoms of synovitis and pain and improving
function. arden et al. 14
compared improvements in%oma3 score follo%ingtidal irrigation# performed%ith a 2. mm %ristarthroscope# and intra-articular corticosteroidinjec-tion. oth treatments
provided short-term painrelief ho%ever# the
$enefits lasted longer after irrigation. after " months#only ! of patients %horeceived cortico-steroidsreported continuedimprovement# compared%ith "4! of those %hounder%ent tidal i rrigation.in $oth groups# the $estoutcomes %ere reported in
patients %ith effusion andradiographic signs of mildoa at $aseline. van
oosterhout et al. 1*
compared arthroscopiclavage in
ospital8arl:ustav8arus!%echnical=niversityof
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
2/45
ospital 8arl :ustav 8arus! ?edical &aculty of the %echnical =niversity of
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
3/45
reviews
eypoints
1
■ Os
t
e
o
a
r
t
h
r
i
t
i
s
(
O
A
)
o
f
t
h
e
k
n
e
e
s
h
o
ul
d
f
i
r
s
t
b
e
t
r e
a
t
e
d
n
o
n
s
u
r
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
"
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
!
i
f
t
h
i
s
a
pp
r
o
a
c
h
f
a
i
l
s
!
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
s
u
r
g
i
c
a
l
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
2■ A
r thr oscopic lavage and debr idement should not b
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
4/45
e used as a r outine tr eatmen
t in knee O
A! a
s only selected
patients might
bene
f it" neither pr ocedur e alter
s disease pr ogr
ession
3■
evide
nc
e
for
the
us
e
of
bo
ne
ma
rro
w
sti
mu
lati
on
tec
hni
$u
es
for
kn
ee
O
A
i
s
u
n
c
l
e
a
r
"
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r t
h
i
s
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
f
o
c
a
l
c
a
r
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
5/45
til
a
g
e
d
e
f
e
ct
s
4
■ Osteotomy is r ecommended f or y
oung! active pa
tients with knee O
A
whoar enotsuitablecandidatesf or a
rthr oplasty
5
■ %o
t
a
l
k
n
e
e
a
r
t
h
r
o
p
la
s
t
y
i
s
a
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
c
o
s
t
'
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
s
e
v
e
r
e
k
ne
e
O
A
!
a
l
t
h
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
r
i
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
6/45
s
k
s
a
n
d
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
h
o
r
o
u
g
h
l
y
c
on
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
6■
=ni
c
om
p
a
rt
m
e
n
t
al
k
n
e
e
a
rt
h
r
opl
ast
y
or
pat
ell
ofe
mo
ral
re
pla
ce
me
nt
ca
n
be
an
opt
ion
for
sel
ect
ed
pat
ients
wit
h
iso
lat
ed
me
dia
l or
pat
ell
ofe
mo
ralO
A!
res
pe
cti
vel
y
a
de $ridementor a
place
$o procedur e.theresultsof thisstudyhave
$eene+tensivelyde
$ated#assevera
lmethodo-logicalissues%ereraisedag
ainstthe
protocolem
ployed#includingtheuseof anun
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
7/45
validatedoutcomemeasur e-me
nt(namelythe7K
nee-s
pecif ic8ainscale9)#ar estric-tive
patientselection(favoringmainlymale
patients)and
possi $leselection
$ias(44!of eligi
$le patientsdeclined
to participate#andthere%asnostratificationfor oasever
ity).mostof theseissues%ereaddressedin astudy
$yKirkley et al.
thatcomparedacom$ination of arthr osco
piclavage
and,or de$rideme
ntand
physicalandmedicaltherapy%ith
physicalandmedicalthe
rapyalone.again#nodif fer ences%ere
o$ser ved
$et%eenthet%otreatmentgroupsin%oma3score
: a%ell-validatedoutco
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
8/45
memeasur e
: after
year s.ar ece
nt3ochr aner evi
e%1"
of arthr osco
picde
$ridementf
or k n
ee oaidentifiedonlythree%ell-
performedstudies#'#1
#1'
andconcludedfromthesethatthe
procedurehasno
$enef it for oa
arisingfrommechanical or inflammatorycauses.;o%ever#acriticalsystematicrevie% of allavaila$le
pu$lications12
concl
udedthatarthr osco
picde$ridementoffer ed
$enef it to
patients
%ithmeniscaltears
andknees%ithlo%-gradeoa.theosteoarthritisresear chsocietyintern
ational(oarsi)vie%sarthrosco
picde
$ride
mentfor kneeoaascontr oversial.
onthe
$asisof availa$leevidence#arthr
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
9/45
osco
piclavageseemsto
pr ovideonlyshort-
ter m
$enefit
toselected
patients%ithmildradiographicoaandeffusion.inaddi-tion#arthr osco
picde$ridementshouldnot
$eusedas aroutinetreatmentfor oa of the
knee#although
patients%ithsym
ptomaticmeni
scaltearsandloose
$odies%ithlockingsym
ptomscould
$enefit.neither
pr ocedur e
altersthe
pr ogressionof oa.
&igure 1 | 8haracteristic appearance of advanced osteoarthritis of the knee!occurring mainly in the medial compartment. a | radiograph revealing medial jointspace narrowing and the presence of osteophytes. b | Arthroscopic view showscartilage loss at the medial femoral condyle and tibia.
-1 5 6 00 5 vol * www.nature.com6nrrheum
C 3 / ?acmillan 9ublishers imited. All rightsreserved
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
10/45
reviews
hatever techni/ueisu
sed#thefi
$r ocartilaginoustissue
pr oduced
$y
$on
emarr
o%stimulationdoesnot
havethe
$iomechanical
pro per tiesanddur a$ilityof theoriginalarticular cartilage#and
thetreatment
pro $-a$lydoesnotalter the
progressionof oa.
onemarro%stimu
lationisnot#
theref ore# acurativetreatmentho%ever#
many patientso$tainrelief fromsymptomsfor sever alyears.
2 theresults aregoodfor smallandfocalchondrallesions#%hichoccur
in patients%ithmoderateoa inadvancedoa#%hichisusuall
yassociated%ithlargechondraldefects# thetechni/uesarelesseffective.
unf ortunately#
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
11/45
nor andomi
edor contr olled
pr os
pec-tivestud
ieshavea
p pr o
p
riatelyevaluat
edth
esetechni/ues.3linicaltrialshaveoftenuseddistinctindicationsandtechni/ues#andonlyshort-ter mfollo%
-up.insummary#theevidencefor the
useof
$onemarro%stimulationtech-
ni/uesin
pati
ents%ithkneeoaremainsunclear. the
primaryindicationfor thissurgical
procedureremainsfocalcartilagedefects.
Osteotomyosteotomyis anesta$lished
procedurefor
thetreatment of unicompartmental kneeoathathas
$eenin usesince
the1 "0s. 4# *
osteotomyentailscuttingthrough the
$oneandfi+ingit inanother
position in
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
12/45
or der tochan
gethealignmentand#conse/uentl
y#r edistr i
$uteth
e%eightload.asar es
ultof technicaladvancesinunico
mpartmentalandtotalkneearthroplasty#osteotomyhas
$ecomelessfre-/uently
perf ormed.
%iththeintr oduction of ne%tech-ni/ues
andmor e-sta$lefi+ationdevices#ho%ever#this
procedureis
e+periencingresurgenceinsomecountr ies. inunicompart
mental kneeoa#thegoalof osteotomyis totransf er the%eight loadfromdamagedareasto theunimpairedfemor oti$ialcompartment#andconse
/uentlyreducesymptomsanddelaytheneedfor
jointreplac
e-ment.medialcompartment oaismostoftenassoci-ated%ith avarusdefor mityof theti$ia
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
13/45
ther ef or e#hi
ghti
$ialosteotomyisthetechni/u
emostoften
perf or
medar oundthek nee.oa
of thelateralcompartmentinco
m- $ination%ithvalgusmalalignmentof thedistalfemur istreated%ithsupracondylar
femoralosteotomy.additionalarthroscopictrea
tmentisoften
perf ormedatthesametime asosteotomy#ma
king itdifficult todistinguishtheeffectof eachoperation.
earlyresultsfromosteotomyareusuallygood#%ithdeterioration over
timeo%ingto oa
progression.the
pro$a $ilityof 7osteotomysurvival9(defined asnon-conversiontototalkneearthro
plasty) after 10yearsrangesfrom*0!to
0!." 20 ameta-analysis21 of highti$ialosteotomydemonstrated anoverall 10-year
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
14/45
f ailur er ateof
*!#andanaver
ageof
months
$
et%eenhighti
$ialosteotomyandconver
sion tototalkneearthroplasty.the
pro $a$ilityof a7good9or 7e+cellent9result%as
*
!after "0monthsand"0!after 100month
s.21s
everalstudieshavedemonstr ate
dthatthedegreeof cor rectionisthemost
im por tantfact
or for thesuccess of osteotomy.'#2
3omputer-assistednavigationimprovesthe
precision of correction#and
possi $lyimprovesthe
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
15/45
%able 1 |Duantity of liter atur
e r elating to var
ious sur gicalpr oc
edur es f or knee O
A
Search terms used
Osteoarthritis and lavag
Osteoarthritis and debrid
Osteoarthritis and osteot
Osteoarthritis and unico
Osteoarthritis and patell
Osteoarthritis and (arthra Eumber ofarticle
sretr ievedfromasearchofthe9ub?eddatabaseconductedin
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
16/45
tor s f or osteo
tomy f ailur e include f emale se+# o
$esity and sever e oa.
#
'
t%o
$asic h
igh ti
$ial
osteotomy techni/ues ar e us
ed to tr eat a
var us def or mity o
f the ti
$ia
? later al closing %edge and
medial o
peni
ng %edge osteotomy
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
17/45
(Figur e 2)
. later al closing %edge ost
eotomy gener a
lly r e/uir es a f i
$
ular osteot
omy# %hich incur s the r isk
of
per oneal n
er ve
palsy
additi
onal disadv
antages include the need f o
r t%o sa% cut
s and detachment o
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
18/45
f the e+ten
sor muscles. on the other h
and# a lar ge
ar ea of
$one conta
ct is
pr o-d
uced# %hich su
p por ts r elia
$
le
postsur gic
al
$one healing. m
edial o
peni
ng %edge osteotomy has
$eco
me incr eas-in
gly
po
pular since
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
19/45
the develo
p
ment of angle-sta
$le im
plan
ts# o%ing to
the sim
ple medial
a p pr oach in
volved and the
possi
$ility
of
pr ecisely
ad justing the degr
ee of cor r e
ction.
one healing f ollo%i
ng an o
pening
%edge
pr ocedur e i
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
20/45
s r e
por tedl
y r elia
$le# even if the ost
eotomy ga
p is
not tr eated
$y
$o
ne gr af ting
.2"
to date#
ther e is no evidence f or a
$etter outcom
e f o
llo%ing eit
her the o
pening or closing
%edge techni/
ue.2
@iven th
at u
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
21/45
nicom
par tmental and tot
al k nee ar thr
o-
plasty ar e not ideal f or
pa
tients %ho ar e young# a
ctive and hav
e
physically demanding
jo
$s#
osteotomy should
$e con
sider ed in th
ese cases. the ideal candidat
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
22/45
e f or osteo-tomy is act
ive# younger
than *0 year s old# has
a histor y of isolated m
edial com
par t
ment
pain# a malalignme
nt of less than 1*A# a
meta
physeal t
i $ial var us# f ull r ange
natur e
r e
vie%s
5 rhe
umatolo
gyvolume* 5 6une
00 5 -11
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
23/45
C 3 / ?acmillan 9ublishers reserved
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
24/45
reviews
a b +oint replacementreplacement of the entire knee joint# or total knee arthro-
plasty# is a safe and cost-effective treatment for severe oaof the knee (Figure 4). 2 ura$le alleviation of pain and
improvement of physical function can $e e+pected follo%-ing the procedure. 2 #40 in addition to physician-deriveddata# patient-centered outcome measurements have also
$ecome an essential component of any long-term analysisof the success of total knee replacement. 41 o%ing to itsirreversi$le nature# joint replacement is recom mendedonly in patients for %hom other treatment modalitieshave failed. " the procedure has a remarka$ly higher risk of failure 10 years after implantation in patients aged*0 years and younger 42 than in patients aged 0 years or older. 2 #4 #42 3omplications of joint replacement surgeryinclude prosthetic loosening# %earing of the polyethyleneinsert# infection and periprosthetic fractures. For patientsyounger than *0 years# therefore# the risks and $enefits of less-invasive surgical alternatives should $e thoroughly%eighed against those of total knee arthroplasty. 40#44
&igure - | >igh tibial osteotomy! often used to treat medial unicompartmental knee8atients over 0 years of age are considered the $estcandi dates for total knee replacement. 2 increasingly#
osteoarthritis. Osteotomy is carried out at the proFimal end of the tibia toolder patients %ith severe oa# as %ell as younger patients#overcorrect a varus malalignment and transfer the weight load to the intact lateral
compartment. a | %he closing wedge techni$ue involves the eFcision of a lateral' are successfully treated %ith total knee arthroplasty. 2 #4*
based bone wedge from the proFimal tibia and part of the fibula. b | %he opening registers from all over the %orld# such as the s%edishwedge techni$ue re$uires only one osteotomy and the medial'based opening of Knee arthroplasty register# 4* demonstrate a constantthe resulting gap. increase in joint replacement rates. 6oint replacement
must $e considered in patients %ith radiographic evi-a b dence of knee oa %ho have pain and disa$ility refractory
to conservative or joint-preserving therapy. 44 the indica-tion criteria for joint replacement surgery# ho%ever# mightvary $et%een countries. 4"
the demand for musculoskeletal health care servicesis e+pected to increase su$stantially in aging populationsas pu$lic e+pectations rise and diagnosis and treatmentimprove. 4 using a structured method to score pain#function# movement and deformity# the ne% Bealand
priority criteria ensure an impartial distri$ution of total joint replacement. 4' in s%eden# patients are categori edinto three groups on the $asis of pain level# serious func-tional impairment# and at least *0! reduction in radio-graphically visi$le joint space. 4 y contrast# the ontario;ip and Knee replacement 8roject team suggests a
patient-oriented approach? the need for joint replacementsurgery is indicated $y $oth the patient9s o%n perceptionsof overall symptomatic $urden and physician-derivedinformation from clinical judgments and health statusinstrument scores. *0 still# an evidence-$ased consensus
&igure | %otal knee arthroplasty replaces the femoral and tibial contact areas. on the appropriate indication for knee replacement needs Additional patellar replacement can be done optionally. a | Anteroposterior and to $e developed.b | lateral views show the metal femoral and tibial prosthetic implants. A fiFed the ideal timing of joint replacement surgery is contro-polyethylene insert is placed between the two implants. versial. 8atients %ith more-severe oa gain more from the
operation# $ut remain in %orse health postoperatively#of motion of the knee# a mi of less than 20 and radio- than patients %ith less-severe disease. *1 surgery at angraphic evidence of moderate# isolated medial compart- earlier disease stage could# therefore# $e prefera$le.ment oa. 2' ;o%ever# the $enefits of osteotomy are less age and comor$idities are su$stantial risk factors for immediate than those of knee arthroplasty# and the adverse outcomes after joint replacement. the risks of
outcome is less predicta$le. major complications# including mortality# infection# and
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
25/45
-13 5 6 00 5 vol * www.nature.com6nrrheum
C 3 / ?acmillan 9ublishers imited. All rights reserved
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
26/45
reviews
pulmonary em$olism# are %ell kno%n. * in addition to a bscreening for these complications# preoperative assess-ment of mental status %ith standardi ed instruments#such as the mini mental state e+am# can help to identify
older patients at risk for delirium. 2
unicompartmental knee replacementunicompartmental knee arthroplasty could $e indicatedin cases %here oa involves only one of the three com-
partments of the knee:the medial ti$iofemoral# lateralti$iofemoral or patellofemoral compartment. the mostcommon unicompartmental knee arthroplasty replacesthe contact surfaces of only the medial ti$iofemoralcompartment %ith t%o metallic prosthetic devices andinserts a polyethylene inlay $et%een them (Figure *). For medial compartment knee arthroplasty to $e indicated#the knee ligaments (anterior and posterior cruciate liga-ments# medial and lateral collateral ligaments) should $eintact# the varus deformity should $e correcta$le# andthe lateral compartment should have full-thickness carti-
&igure , | =nicompartmental knee arthroplasty in isolated medial osteoarthritislage. *2 unicompartmental knee replacement should not $e performed in knees that have previously undergone replaces only the medial femoral and tibial contact areas. a | Anteroposterior and
b | lateral views show the metal femoral and tibial prosthetics. A mobilehigh ti$ial osteotomy. *4polyethylene meniscal insert is placed between the two implants.
the use of modern implants and surgical techni/ueshas improved clinical results and survival rates of medialunicompartmental knee arthroplasty. ** outcomes for relia$le and favora$le results. "* " one reason for failurethe treatment of lateral unicompartmental knee oa are of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty is the progression of rarely reported. *" these results are less predicta$le than oa in the ti$iofemoral joint. indications for isolatedthose of medial unicompartmental oa# despite recent patellofemoral replacement include diseases of the patello-improvements in implant design. scientific de$ate a$out femoral joint leading to isolated arthritis? trochlear dys-the involvement of the patellofemoral joint in knee oa is plasia# post-traumatic arthritis and recurrent dislocationsongoing. the e+perience of the surgeon has a considera$le or su$lu+ations. "' oa of the ti$iofemoral joint should $eimpact on the outcome of unicompartmental arthroplasty? ruled out# as the treatment %ould $e unsuita$le for sucha learning curve# %ith %orse results for the surgeon9s first cases. " if the suita$ility of patellofemoral replacement is10 procedures# has $een suggested. * long-term survival uncertain# a conventional total knee replacement is recom-depends on the rate of implant failure and,or progression mended. replacement of the patellofemoral joint is likelyof oa in the lateral or patellofemoral compartment of to have a su$stantial learning curve for the surgeon# andthe knee. in general# the 10-year survival rate of medial is $est performed in speciali ed centers. 40
unicompartmental knee replacement is slightly %orsethan that of total knee arthroplasty. 4* speciali ed centers total knee replacementreport e/ual survival rates for medial unicompartmental total knee replacement is the gold standard for end-stageimplant and esta$lished total knee arthroplasty implants. *' knee oa. 2 a large num$er of %ell-designed studies havein cases of conversion from medial unicompartmental reported preoperative and postoperative results andknee replacement to total knee replacement# one-third precisely descri$ed study populations these data %ereof patients need $one grafting or %edges to augment the pooled for a us government-commissioned health tech-medial $one defect of the ti$ia. * the revision of a uni- nology assessment of total knee replacement. " most of thecompartmental knee arthroplasty# in %hich damaged patients in the report %ere a$out * years of age# t%o thirdsimplants are replaced# is considered easier# and the results %ere female and one third %ere considered o$ese 0! suf-superior# to revision of a total knee replacement. "0 fered from oa. instruments used to report improvements
isolated patellofemoral oa occurs in 10! of patients included the Knee society Knee score (KsKs)# the ;ospital%ith knee oa. "1 underlying disorders often include prior for special surgery (;ss) Knee score# the %oma3 scoretrauma to the patella# malalignment of the patellofemoral and the sF-2"# a general-purpose 2"-/uestion health
joint# trochlea dysplasia and degeneration secondary to survey. e+pressed as mean effect si es# %ith a result greater deep $ending# overuse and,or age. " Fe% patients undergo than 0.' considered a large treatment effect# increases inisolated patellofemoral replacement# "2#"4 although this these scores varied %ith the scoring instrument used.num$er is increasing. speciali ed centers report encour- %ith the ;ss score# the o$served mean effect si e rangedaging results. "2 on the other hand# these patients can also from 2. 1 ( -year follo%-up) to . (C* years9 follo%-up).
$e treated %ith conventional total knee replacement# %ith studies using the KsKs reported effect si es $et%een .2*
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
27/45
nature revie%s 5 rheumatology volume * 5 6une 00 5 -1-
C 3 / ?acmillan 9ublishers imited. All rights reserved
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
28/45
reviews
(0
ye
ar s)and
."
(C*year s).in%oma3studies
%itha
-year f ollo%-u
p#themeanef fectsi
e%as
1." #and#finally#themeaneffectsi eusing thesF-2"%as1. .the
proce-dure#then#
%asgenerallyreportedto
producesu$stantialimpr ovement
s#althoughtheuseof mor e-
joint-specificoutcomemeasures%asassociated%iththereportingof rema
rka$lygreater
effects. inthisreport#
poolingalltheincludedstudiesresultedin acumulativerateof adve
rseevents of *.4!.themostseverecom
plication%as
peri-
oper ativemortality(0.*!). 2
of note#0. 1! of infectionsand
0.41! of
pulmonaryem$olismoccurred%ithinthefirst
0daysafter surg
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
29/45
er y.*
hes%edis
hK neearthr o
plasty
r egistr y4*
sho%sthatr evisionr ateso
f totalk neearthr o
plasty
havedecr easedover time.impr ovedsurgicaltechni/uesandimpr ovedimplanttechnology%er
e $othsuggested asreasonsfor theimpr ovedoutcome
s.therateof com
plicationsinsomestudiesareinverselyrelatedtohospitalandsurgeonvolumesof oper ations
per
year .2
acom
parisonof outcomesfollo
%ingeither thereten-tionor sacrificeof the
posterior cruciateligament(83l)duringtotalkneereplacement is
providedin a3ochranereport
$ased on
eightrandomi
edstudiesatotalof * 0
patients%ithoaor rheumat
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
30/45
oidarthritisf o
llo%ed-u
pf or *years%er eincluded.
0
nodif f er ences
in painor str ength%er e
found
$et%een
patients%hose83l%as
sacrificedandthose in%hom it%asretained.8atients%hose83l%assacrificedandin%hom a
posterior sta$i
li edinlay%asusedsho%edan'Agreater incr
easeinrange of motioncom
pared%iththose%hose83l%asretained.
theclinicalscor es(usingthe;ssscor e)
demonstrated astatisticallysignificantadvantage of intraoper ative83lsacrificeover retention#although
theclinicalrelevance of thisadvantage is/uestiona$le
. aseparate3ochranereportcom
paredtheclinicaloutcomesand
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
31/45
posto
per ative
r angeof motionf ollo%ingtheuseo
f either mo
$ileor
fi+edti
$ialinsertsinto
talkneearthr oplasty?onlyt%ostudiesmetthe
inclusioncriteria#andtheoutcomesdidnotdiffer
$et%eenthet%otreatmentmodalities. 1
t%one%technologiesintroducedintototalkneearthr oplasty
surgeryareminimallyinvasivesurgery(mis)and
navigatedtotal
kneearthr oplasty.agreatnum
$er of reports
deal%ithminimallyinva
sive 2
totalkneearthr oplasty
: althoughnoacce
pteddefinition of mise+ists. incont
rasttothenumerousavaila$ledescriptionsof mis
techni/ues#onlyafe%randomiedcontrolledtrials
haveinvestigated
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
32/45
the
potential
$en
ef itsof mis.sometr
ialssho%a
$enef icia
lshort-ter mef fectof mis#%her easother sdonot
. ameta-analysisof short-termoutcome
ssho%ed
asmalladvantage for misover conventionalsurgery#
$utmainly instudiesthatcom
$inedmis
%iththeuseof anavigationsystem.3om
puter navigationimpr ovesthe
precisionof
postoper ativealignmentfollo
%ingtotalkneearthr oplasty#assho%ninlong-legradiogra
phs.2 noaddi-
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
33/45
tionalef fectof com
puter navigationhas
$eensho%noncom
ponentalignmentor
ear lyclinicaloutcomes.
%heth
er thisimpr oved
precision%illleadto
$etter long-termresultsandlo%er revisionratesisunkno%n.
3om puter navigationre/uireslonger oper atingtimesthanconven-tionalsurgery#andhasareportedlearn
ingcurve of a$out 20
procedur es. 4
thesefactsmighthaveinfluenced themajo
rityof surgeons%honotdonavigateeachtotalkneearthr oplasty#eventhoughthee/ui
pment isavaila$le.
* in
summar y# noclear evidencee+ists torecommendthe%idespreaduseof either misor com
puter navigation in
totalkneearthr oplasty.
8onclusionsinitially#treatmentof kneeoa
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
34/45
should
$enons
urgical.if thisther a
pyfails#ho%ever #surgicaltr eatmentcan
$ere
commended."#
ina
dvan
cedstages of kneeoa%ithcom
pletelossof artic
ular cartilage#totalkneearthr oplastyrelia
$lyrelieves
painandimpr ovesfunc-tion.if oaislimited tothemedialcom
partment#uni-com
partmentalkneearthr oplastyis
e/uallyeffectiveastotalkneereplacement.osteotomy
should $econsidere
d for young#active
patients%ithunicompartm
entaloa.
onemarr o%stimulationtechni/uescan
$eusedtotreatfull-thick nesschondrallesions
patients%ithmoderateoa%ithsmallchondraldefects
$enefitmost
fromthisappr oach.arthr oscopiclavageandde$r
idementshould
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
35/45
not
$eusedasr
outinetr eatmentsf or k neeoaho%ever #
patients%ithsym
pto
maticmeniscaltear sa
ndloo
se $odies%ithlockingsym
ptomsmight
$enefitfromthese
proce-dures. insummary# allavaila$lesurgicaltreatmentsshould $econsidered#andtheappr opriatetreatmentselectedonthe
$asisof the
patient9s
char acter istics# as%ellasthe
presentationandseverity
of thedisease.
Geviewcriteria
Article
spublishedinenglisha
nd:er manwer eident
ifiedbysearching9ub?edin<ecember3
5usin
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
36/45
g the f ollowing sear ch ter ms4 Hosteoar thr itis and lavageI! Hosteoar thr it
is an
ddebridementI!Hosteoarthritisand osteotomy and kneeI! Hosteoar thr itis and unicom
par tm
ental and kneeI! Hosteoar thr itis
and patellof emor al and kneeI! and Hosteoa
r thr i
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
37/45
tis and (ar thr op
lasty or r eplace
ment) and kneeI.
-1
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
38/45
reviews
@. ;hang! w. et al. OArsi recommendations for the 3- . ? iller! #. s.! steadman! +. r.! #riggs! . .! 1. wright! r. +. et al. 9atient'reported outcome andmanagement of hip and knee osteoarthritis! rodrigo! +. +. J rodkey! w. :. 9atient satisfaction survivorship after inemaF total knee
9art ii4 OArsi evidence'based! eFpert consensus and outcome after microfracture of the arthroplasty. J. ! ne J int Surg. "m. 52'a!guidelines. #ste arthritis $artilage 12! 1-@0123 degenerative knee. J. Knee Surg. 1@! 1-01@ 3 2 03 @ (3 ).(3 5). (3 ). 3. rand! +. A.! %rousdale! r. %.! ilstrup! armsen! w. s. &actors affecting the durabi li tyarthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. of primary total knee prostheses. J. ! ne J int knee. N. %ngl. J. &ed. - @! 51055 (3 3). A preliminary report. J. ! ne J int Surg. "m. @! Surg. "m. 5,'a! 3,/032, (3 -).
/. irkley! A. et al. A randomi*ed trial of /5 0// (1/2,). -. >ofmann! A. A.! >eithoff! s. ?. J 8amargo! ?.arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the 3,. +ackson! +. 9. J waugh! w. %ibial osteotomy for 8ementless total knee arthroplasty in patientsknee. N. %ngl. J. &ed. -,/! 1 /@011 @ (3 5). osteoarthritis of the knee. J. ! ne J int Surg !r. , years or younger. $lin. #rth p. Relat. Res.
1 . >angody! . et al. ?osaicplasty for the treatment -'#! @ 20@,1 (1/21). ! 1 301 @ (3 3).of articular cartilage defects4 application in clinical 32. Aki*uki! s.! shibakawa! A.! %aki*awa! %.! . :unther! . 9. surgical approaches for practice. #rth pedics 31! @,10@,2 (1//5). Kama*aki! i. J >oriuchi! >. %he long'term osteoarthritis. !est Pract. Res. $lin. Rheumat l.
11. #rittberg! ?. et al. %reatment of deep cartilage outcome of high tibial osteotomy4 a ten' to 1,! 23@02 - (3 1).defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte 3 'year follow'up. J. ! ne J int Surg. !r. / ! ,. %he swedish nee Arthroplasty register.
transplantation. N. %ngl. J. &ed. --1! 55/05/, ,/30,/2 (3 5). Annual report 3 @. http466www.knee.nko.se6
(1// ). 3@. van raaij! %.! reijman! ?.! #rouwer! r. w.! english6online6uploaded&iles611 L
13. #ehrens! 9. et al. indications and implementation +akma! %. s. J verhaar! +. E. survival of closing' s Ar3 @Lengl1.3.pdf .of recommendations of the working group wedge high tibial osteotomy4 good outcome in 2. ?e rF! >. et al. international variation in hipH%issue regeneration and %issue substitutesI men with low'grade osteoarthritis after replacement rates. "nn. Rheum. 'is. 23!for autologous chondrocyte transplantation 1 012 years. "cta #rth p. @/! 3- 0- (3 5). 3330332 (3 -).(A8%) M:ermanN. (. #rth p. )hre. Grenzge*. 1 3! 35. 8oventry! ?. #.! ilstrup! . %. >igh tibial osteotomy , . lewellyn'%homas! >. A.! Arshinoff! r.! #ell! ?.!administration of corticosteroids! arthroscopic for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee4 williams! +. i. J Eaylor! 8. .! Ackroyd! 8. e. Jaupattarakasem! 9. J sumananont! 8 . knee. An arthroscopic study of , knee joints. ubbard! ?. +. Articular debridement versus Sp rts +raumat l. "rthr sc. 1@! 13501- (3 /). ,-. ?urray!
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
39/45
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
40/45
reviews
60. saldanh
a!
. A.!
eys!:.w.!sv
ar d!=.8.!white!s.>.
J r ao!8.r evisionofOFf or dmedialunicompar t
mentalkneearthr oplastyto
totalkneearthr oplastyRresultsofamulti
centr estudy.K nee 1!3@,03@/(3
@).61. ?
c Alindon! %. e.! snow! s.! 8ooper ! 8.
J <ieppe!
9.
A. r adiogr aphi
c patter ns of
osteoarthriti
s oftheknee
jointinthecommunity4theimportanceofthepat
ellof emoral
joint.
"nn. Rheum.'is.,1!5
05 /(1//3).
62. :r els
amer!r.9.Jstein!
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
41/45
ty4five'year sur vivor shipandf unctionalr esults.J .!
ne J
i nt Sur g .!r .5/!-
1
0-1,(3
@).
64. 8ar tier !9
.!sanouiller!+.
.J
hef acha!
A.
ong'ter mresultswiththefir stpatellof emor alpr osthe
sis.$ li n.#rt h
p.R el at .R es.
-2!
@ 0,
(3
,).
65.as
kin!
r . s. J van stei
jn! ?. %otal knee r eplacement
f or patients wi
th patellof emor a
l
ar thritis.$ li n.#rt h
p.R el at .R es.-2@!5/
0/,(1///).
66. ?ont!?.
A.!>aa
s!s.!?ullick!%.J >
unger f or d!<.s.%ot
alkne
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
42/45
e ar thr oplasty f or patellof emor al ar thr itis. J . !
ne J
i nt Sur g .
"
m. 5
'a! 1/@@
01/5
1 (3
3).
67. 9ar vi*i!+.!stuar t!?.+.!9agn
ano!?.w.J >anssen
! A.<.%otalknee ar
thr oplasty in pat
ients
with isolated patellof emor al ar thr itis.
$li n.#rt h p.Rel at.Re
s.-/3!1 @
01,3(3
1).
68. <elanois!r.e.
etal. r esultsoftotalkn
eer epl
acementforisolatedpatellofemoralarthritis4whennottoper for mapatellofemoralarthroplasty.#rt h
p.$li n.Nrth
"m. -/!-510-55(3
5).
69.ane!r.
.et al.%ota
lkneer eplacement.%
v i d .R
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
43/45
e p. + ec hn
l .
"ssess. / Summ.
0 1
05 (3
-).
70. +acobs!
w. 8.! 8lement!
<. +. J wymenga!
A. #.
r etention ver sus r emovalof the poster ior cr uciate ligamentin totalknee r eplacement4
asystem
aticliter atur ereviewwithinthe8ochraneframewor k.
"ct a#rt h p.@2!@,@
0@25(3
,).
71. +acobs! w.!
Ander son! 9. :.! van
i
mbeek! +. J wyme
nga!
A.
A. #. ?obile bear ing vs f iFed
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
44/45
bearingprosthesesfortotalkneearth
roplastyforpost'operativefunctionalstatusinpatients
withosteoarthritisandrheumatoidarthritis.$ c hrane'at a*ase#S stematic Rev ie s31!issue 3.
Art.Eo.48<
-1-doi41 .1361
2,15,5.8<
-1-.pub3(3
).
72. vav
ken!
9.!:r uber !?.J <or otka!r .Outcomes af ter minimally invasive totalknee r eplacementRa meta'a
nalysis M:er manN.
(.#rt h p.1n all.1 2!@25
0@@3(3
5).
73. #auwens!
.etal. Eaviga
tedtotalkneer eplace
ment.
Ameta'analysis.J
.!
ne
J i ntSurg.
"m.5/!321032/(3
@).
74. +enny! +. K.! ?ie
hlke! r .
. J :iu
r ea!
A.
ear ning
cur ve in navigated tota
-
8/18/2019 Surgical Options Knee Nrrheum
45/45
l knee r eplacement.
A multi'centr e study compar in
g eFper ienced and
b
eginner centr es. K nee 1,! 5
05
(3
5).
75. &r ieder ich!E.J
ver donk!r.%heuseof com
puter
'assisted or thopedic sur ger y f or totalknee r eplac
ement in daily pr
ac
tice4asur veyamongess
A6s:O'ssOmember s.K neeSur g.S
pr
ts+r aumat
l .
"rt hr
sc.12!,-2
0,
- (3
5)
.
5 600 5
vol
*www.nature.com6nrrhe