survey results report

Download Survey results report

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: nina-mchale

Post on 29-Nov-2014

960 views

Category:

Technology


4 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. LITA Drupal Interest GroupChairs: Nina McHale & Christopher Evjy ALA Midwinter Meeting January 21 2012 S
  • 2. Drupal IG Renewal/ChargeS IG formed in 2009; renews in 2012S Explore and promote the use of Drupal among libraries and librarians, facilitating communication and establishing best practices.
  • 3. Survey SaysS 12 question survey ran from 12/27/11 1/6/12S Sent to drupal4lib, web4lib, lita-l, code4libS Posted to Twitter, Facebook, and the Libraries group on Drupal.orgS 79 responses!
  • 4. Survey SaysS Content of the survey was based on Dale Askeys We Love Open Source Software. No, You Cant Have Our Code column S http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/527S Questions asked respondents what barriers might keep them from contributing code back to the Drupal community
  • 5. Respondent Data: Type of EmploymentS I have a permanent, full-time position working in a library environment: 82%S I am a web development consultant with one or more clients: 10%S Other: 8% S Library vendor, combination permanent/consultant, part-time library employment
  • 6. Respondent Data: Library TypeS Public: 44%S Academic: 54%S School: 4%S Special: 10%S Other: 10% S vendor, government, nonprofit, consortium
  • 7. Respondent Data: Contributed Code?S Yes, I have: 15%S No, but Id like to: 68%S No, but I cant: 13%S No, and I dont want to: 4%
  • 8. Askeys Reasons for No ParticipatingS PerfectionismS DependencyS QuirkinessS RedundancyS CompetitivenessS Misunderstanding
  • 9. Unless the code is perfect, we dont want anyone to see it.S Very likely: 14%S Likely: 37%S Neither likely/unlikely: 17%S Unlikely: 28%S Completely unlikely: 4%
  • 10. If we share this with you, you will never leave us alone.S Very likely: 12%S Likely: 24%S Neither likely/unlikely: 15%S Unlikely: 24%S Completely unlikely: 11%
  • 11. Well gladly share, but we cant since were so weird.S Very likely: 12%S Likely: 19%S Neither likely/unlikely: 15%S Unlikely: 40%S Completely unlikely: 14%
  • 12. We think your project is neat, but we can do better.S Very likely: 3%S Likely: 12%S Neither likely/unlikely: 23%S Unlikely: 55%S Completely unlikely: 8%
  • 13. We want to be the acknowledged leader.S Very likely: 0%S Likely: 10%S Neither likely/unlikely: 21%S Unlikely: 21%S Completely unlikely: 49%
  • 14. A fundamental [misunderstanding] of how an open source community works.S Very likely: 0%S Likely: 14%S Neither likely/unlikely: 21%S Unlikely: 40%S Completely unlikely: 25%
  • 15. What could the IG do to support code contribution back to Drupal.org?S Education/training: ALL levels S Programming (PHP) S Process of submission (contrib standards)S Showcasing colleagues workS Communication: S With vendors S Meet-ups S Foster collaboration among developers
  • 16. Select ResponsesS Perhaps eliminate any FUD surrounding issues of oss.S Maybe focus on getting library-specific vendors to support product integrationS it would be great to have a match making service to find co-maintainersS Provide space to share ideas and develop a developer group for a module of interest.
  • 17. Select Responses, contdS We [are] all out there, were just not connecting.S Ive developed a couple of very small modules. I dont both to contribute via official Drupal channels because it would require learning the contrib standardsS More library-specific meetups and events to showcase others work and possibly foster better collaboration.
  • 18. Proposal for IG DirectionS Increase communication venues/opportunitiesS Develop a wish list of modulesS Establish a formal/official relationship with the Drupal.org libraries group S Drupal.org is THE venue for Drupal community S Removes possibility of redundancy