susan cartwrightour evolving universe1 the deaths of stars n what happens to stars when the helium...
TRANSCRIPT
Our Evolving Universe 1Susan Cartwright
The Deaths of Stars
What happens to stars when the helium runs out?
do they simply fade into oblivion? NO!
stellar deaths producesome of the mostspectacular phenomenain the universe
and also play a vital rolein enriching with heavyelements the materialof which new stars aremade
Our Evolving Universe 2Susan Cartwright
Stellar lifetimes
Our binary star data suggest that the lifetimes of stars with mass < 0.9 Msun are longer than 15 billion years (the age of the universe)
But massive stars have lifetimes of only a few million years
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+11
1.E+12
1.E+13
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
mass (solar masses)
esti
mate
d m
ain
-sequence
lif
eti
me (
years
)
Popper T2
Popper T4/5
Popper T8
Malkov
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+11
1.E+12
1.E+13
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
mass (solar masses)
esti
mate
d m
ain
-sequence
lif
eti
me (
years
)
Popper T2
Popper T4/5
Popper T8
Malkov
HR Diagram
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
B - V
Abso
lute V
isual
Magn
itude
HR Diagram
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
B - V
Abso
lute V
isual
Magn
itude
Our Evolving Universe 3Susan Cartwright
Stellar statistics
A census of nearby stars: most stars are low mass
red dwarfs a few percent are 1–2 x
the Sun’s mass very massive stars are
very rare (only 3 B and no O class blue stars in the 3800 stars within 75 light years of the Sun)
Stellar deaths are rare (but crucial to our
existence!)
III
IIIIV
VWD
B
A
F
G
K
M
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Stars within 25 pc
III
IIIIV
VWD
B
A
F
G
K
M
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Stars within 25 pc
Our Evolving Universe 4Susan Cartwright
The deaths of Sun-like stars
Giant stars are very unstable
especially those which are fusing helium
Outer layers of star easily lost
mass loss seen in spectra of these stars
rate increases towards end of helium fusion
Our Evolving Universe 5Susan Cartwright
Mass loss in Sun-like stars
1.52
1.54
1.56
1.58
1.6
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.7
1.72
1.6E+09 1.7E+09 1.7E+09 1.8E+09 1.8E+09 1.9E+09 1.9E+09
time (years)
mass (
sola
r m
asses)
1.52
1.54
1.56
1.58
1.6
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.7
1.72
1.6E+09 1.7E+09 1.7E+09 1.8E+09 1.8E+09 1.9E+09 1.9E+09
time (years)
mass (
sola
r m
asses)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
3.53.553.63.653.73.753.83.853.93.95
log T
log
L
Star of 1.7 solar masses
Star of 1.7 solar masses
Our Evolving Universe 6Susan Cartwright
Death of a star
At end of helium fusion star has lost all its outer layers
central, very hot, carbon core surrounded by expelled gas
ultraviolet radiation from hot core causes gas to produce emission lines
planetary nebula nothing to do with planet,
just looks like one!
Our Evolving Universe 7Susan Cartwright
Planetary nebulae
Our Evolving Universe 8Susan Cartwright
The legacy of Sun-like stars
Giant stars have convective outer layers
elements formed in core are transported to surface
thus ejected in planetary nebula
Planetary nebulae thus enrich the interstellar gas with many elements
nitrogen, barium, zirconium, etc.
Stellar core is eventually revealed as small, hot white dwarf star
Our Evolving Universe 9Susan Cartwright
Fusing heavy elements
Massive stars have much hotter cores
successfully fuse elements up to iron But this is a very temporary respite:
for a star of 20 solar masses, hydrogen fusion lasts around 15 million
years helium fusion lasts around one million
years carbon fusion lasts 300 years oxygen fusion lasts for 7 months silicon fusion lasts for two days and
produces an iron core
H + He
He
C
O
Si
Fenot to scale!
Our Evolving Universe 10Susan Cartwright
The fate of massive stars
Fusing iron requires (does not generate) energy
iron core cannot support itself against gravity
collapses to form neutron star neutron star is about 50% more massive
than Sun, but is only 20 km across basically a gigantic atomic nucleus:
protons and electrons have combined to form neutrons
in extreme cases even this may not be stable, and a black hole is formed instead
outer layers expelled in massive explosion: a supernova
for a few weeks star is nearly as bright as a whole galaxy
SN1994D: HST
Our Evolving Universe 11Susan Cartwright
The legacy of massive stars
Supernova remnants expanding gas cloud,
formerly star’s outer layers
Pulsars rapidly rotating neutron
stars observed by their “lighthouse
beam” of radio emission (sometimes also optical) emitted from magnetic poles of star
Heavy elements formed in the core of the
star as it implodes
Our Evolving Universe 12Susan Cartwright
The Crab pulsar
Spin axis and magnetic axis misaligned: see pulseIn Crab see 2 pulses/cycle: angle must be ~90°
Our Evolving Universe 13Susan Cartwright
Supernova remnants
Cas A in x-rays (Chandra)
Vela
SN1998bu
Remnant of SN386, with central pulsar (Chandra)
Cygnus Loop (HST): green=H, red=S+, blue=O++
Our Evolving Universe 14Susan Cartwright
Building the elements
Routes to building elements:
Start with Add In Making
carbon protons H-fusing stars nitrogen
carbon helium nuclei(α-process)
He-fusing stars oxygen-16, neon-20, etc.
carbon-13, neon-22
helium nuclei He-fusing stars free neutrons
silicon, sulphur
silicon, sulphur pre-supernova stars iron
iron, neon neutrons, slowly(s-process)
He-fusing stars most stable isotopes up to Bi
iron neutrons, rapidly(r-process)
supernovae neutron-rich isotopes
iron add photon, lose neutron? (p-pr)
supernovae rare neutron-poor isotopes
Our Evolving Universe 15Susan Cartwright
Adding neutrons—why does the speed matter? Slow addition of neutrons (s-process) cannot make
isotopes that are “shielded” by unstable isotopes (e.g. 116Cd)
Rapid addition of neutrons (r-process) cannot make those shielded by stable nuclei (e.g. 116Sn)
Some isotopes (p-process) cannot be made by either method (e.g. 112Sn)51
Sb
121 57.3%
122 2.7 d
123 42.7%
50
Sn 112 1.01%
113 115 d
114 0.67%
115 0.38%
116 14.6%
117 7.75%
118 24.3%
119 8.6%
120 32.4%
121 27.1 h
122 4.56%
49
In 112
14 m
113 4.3%
114 71.9 s
115 95.7%
116 14.1 s
117 44 m
48
Cd 110 12.5%
111 12.8%
112 24.1%
113 12.2%
114 28.7%
115 53.4 h
116 7.5%
117 2.4 h
118 50 m
62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Our Evolving Universe 16Susan Cartwright
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1.E+11
0 50 100 150 200
Mass number
No o
f ato
ms p
er
1000000 s
ilic
on
Summary: the abundance of the chemical elements
The iron peak:made in the laststages of fusion
Heavy elements:made by addingneutrons to iron
not madein stars
CNO
p-process isotopes