susan v obama: we're moot? motion to reconsider

8/14/2019 Susan V Obama: We're Moot? Motion To Reconsider

1/23

SUSAN HERBERT

Plaintiff-Appellant

Versus

BARACK OBAMA, JOHN ROBERTSAND THE US

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------------

On Appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida

BEFORE: BLACK, CARNES, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

On the Court's own motion, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as frivolous

and

entirely without merit. See 11th Cir. R. 42-4. Appellant's "Motion to Exceed

Page/Word Limitations" is DENIED AS MOOT. (Dated August 3rd, 2009).

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

MOTION TO RECONSIDER YOUR OWN DESTINY AND FATE THAT

IS: Appellant motions this court to reconsider sentencing their own persons to the death

penalty upon a charge of treason which will eventually come about or be realized as

"stupid" like "ignorant" is not an excuse under our law: I entered this court already

having won my case and this court has acted upon one criminal idea alone: This court

truly believes that I and then WE, the People will put up with this

unconstitutional garbage, YOU AND YOUR IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW ACTIONS,

if only you, the illegally sitting federal court, a part of the corporation US, can stop the

1


2/23


3/23

The State of Colorado (Corp. State). The Corp. State courts then started to subpoename to come and testify as the Governor of the original jurisdiction Republic State. Iresponded to most those subpoenas and so testified. After finding it next to impossibleto beat us in court, the Corp. States sub-corporation, Arapaho County, determined that ifthey could get funding from the United States Congress they could possibly beat us. Onreview, Congress sent the matter to the National Security Council who handed the

matter over to the Militarys Joint Chiefs for review. About two weeks later, the Chiefof the Joint Chiefs responded, What Governor Madsen is doing out their inColorado is legal, lawful and correct; and, if they accomplish what they have setout to do we will recognize that President of The United States of America as thePresident of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of the military andgive them full military support. Though the National Security Council is purely anadvisory committee, having no legislative or judicial effect; the fact remains, theyrecognized the truth and responded with it to Congress who sent the supplicants awaywithout funding; after that, the Corp. State started to leave us alone. The Corp. Stateand its courts, the United States 10th District Court, the United States Congress, theUnited States National Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of the United States ofAmericas military all recognized, reviewed and accepted my election as the original

jurisdiction Governor of Colorado. After serving as Colorados original jurisdictionGovernor for four years, I was lawfully appointed to The United States of Americasoriginal jurisdiction Senate, so I retired from the Governors Office having served a fullterm. The next original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado, Robert Shell, followed me intoOffice and confirmed my appointment to the original jurisdiction Senate. From aroundthe country, 41 other Governors have since been elected in their respective offices.Other Senators were seated as I was and I was elected by them as the original

jurisdiction Senates President pro tempore, where I still serve. An original jurisdictionRepublic State Governor, can appoint and seat that States original jurisdictionNational Senators, who can in turn elect and seat an original jurisdiction Presidentof the United States of America, which has not been done since 1913. Until I waselected, the States had not had Governors seated since at least 1968. The main reason

you see the problems our nation faces today is the people have forgotten what ouractual government is and they instead act as if these private foreign controlledcorporations (Corp. U.S. and the Corp. States) are their government. Its why the Statesare not using our national money system. Its why we are caught up in wars and rumorsof war. It is why Corp. U.S. is exactly following the pattern set in Adolf Hitlers Germany,most recently by setting up a national personal identification system and the HomelandSecurity Police system after the pattern of Hitlers State Security Police the dreadedSS. Historical Outline:

1st: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with GeneralOrders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institutecontinuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or

provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; thismartial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial law authority gives thePresident (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can bedone by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation ofPresidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading withthe Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106,October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is

3
http://window_open%28%27constitutionalrepublic.htm%27%2C%20520%2C430%29/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lieber.htm#sec1http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lieber.htm#sec1http://window_open%28%27constitutionalrepublic.htm%27%2C%20520%2C430%29/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lieber.htm#sec1http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lieber.htm#sec1


4/23

ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress. Today these Actsaddress the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a municipal corporation togovern the District of Columbia. Considering the fact that the municipal governmentitself was incorporated in 1808, an Organic Act (first Act) using the term municipal

corporation in 1871 can only mean a private corporation owned by the municipality.Hereinafter we will call that private corporation, Corp. U.S. By consistent usage, Corp.U.S. trademarked the name, United States Government referring to themselves. TheDistrict of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress in control (like a corporateboard) and gives the purpose of the act to form a governing body over the municipality;this allowed Congress to direct the business needs of the government under the existentmartial law and provided them with corporate abilities they would not otherwise have.This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within theten mile square of the District of Columbia. Follow this link to see the effect of the District of Columbia Act of 1871.

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution),

which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States ofAmerica) except that it was missing the national constitutions 13th Amendment and thenational constitution's 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th,14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take specialnotice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they willadd to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, butthey could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demandedpayment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the paymentsof all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States ofAmerica.

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary businessneeds of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrowsome money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that theywould not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had theyear before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal ReserveBank". Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby theycould transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that thisrelationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involvegovernment; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Banksystemagain it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set thewhole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal orimpossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elementsremain in full force and effect.

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as ifratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collectionsystem based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originallycreated their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no differencebetween that adoption and thissuch is the nature of corporate enactmentswhen the

4
http://memory.loc.gov/ll/llsl/016/0400/04550419.gifhttp://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdfhttp://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdfhttp://window_open%28%27mythology-corpus.htm%27%2C%20695%2C817%29/http://window_open%28%27mythology-corpus.htm%27%2C%20695%2C817%29/http://window_open%28%2713thamendment.htm%27%2C%20700%2C225%29/http://memory.loc.gov/ll/llsl/016/0400/04550419.gifhttp://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdfhttp://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdfhttp://window_open%28%27mythology-corpus.htm%27%2C%20695%2C817%29/http://window_open%28%27mythology-corpus.htm%27%2C%20695%2C817%29/http://window_open%28%2713thamendment.htm%27%2C%20700%2C225%29/


5/23


6/23

with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States asenemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationshipwith their program. With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to UnitedStates General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity

with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and anaccount number (Social Security number). They give you the Social Security card andlet you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them untilthey want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card youactivate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for thecards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the cards name and number to thustransact business relations for the cards actual owner. You are also to note that thoughthe card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entityso created) it is not for use as identification. On review: notice the Social SecurityAdministration was the creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve itsTrustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gaveyou something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved

the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entityby definition,this only describes the creation and existence ofa Trust. More importantly: the namethey gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not yournumber and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this TrustsTrustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your naturalsovereign capacity in any waywhat you do, when you do it and how you do it is stilltotally up to you.

13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to theInternational Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.[From Melvin and Susan: BAD MATH FELLAS!Make sure youre sitting down for thisone. We turn now to United States Code (USC) Title 22 286 and read the following: "

286. Acceptance of membership by the United States in International Monetary Fund."The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in theInternational Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"), and in theInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the"Bank"), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles ofAgreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetaryand Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of theDepartment of State. (July 31, 1945, ch 339, 2, 59 Stat. 512.) Short titles: May becited as the Bretton Woods Agreements Act. "Other provisions: Par value modification.For the Congressional direction that the Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value interms of gold of the Inter-American Development Banks holdings of United Statesdollars following the establishment of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine troy ounce

of gold pursuant to the Par Value Modification Act and for the authorization of theappropriations necessary to provide such maintenance of value, see 31 USC 449a."...The act furthertransfers the assets of the United States Treasury to the IMFby stating words to the effect of: the United States Treasury is now the IndividualDrawing account of the IMF...Think about it. "The President is hereby authorized toaccept membership for the United States in the IMF" The President is authorized bywhom? Congress? Well, even if Congress did authorize it where did they get theauthority to so do? Certainly not from the Constitution, and Congress cantlawfully do anything the Constitution doesnt authorize them to do...The

6
http://www.teamlaw.org/BWAgreements.pdfhttp://www.teamlaw.org/BWAgreements.pdf


7/23

Constitution plainly states: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shallnot be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."... Ninthamendment; and, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to thepeople." ...Tenth Amendment Further this joining in the IMF is obviously an internationalagreement; and, any good dictionary will define, "an agreement between nations" as a,

"Treaty". The constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with thisnation - First, the President signs the treaty; and Second, the Senate ratifies hissignature with a two-thirds majority vote...That didnt happen here. So if the right wasntgiven in the Constitution, Congress cant take it and give it to the President... This actstates that Authorization came from the U.N. instead of from Congress, "provided for as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations": There was no treaty with theU.N. until December 20, 1945, five months later, so the U.N. could not exercise itstreaty with Corp. U.S. If it did not add up then it never will; this is an example ofthe corporation deciding the UN would exist as a legal entity soPREDETERMINING we would enter a treaty with BEFORE that treaty thus thatlegal entity ever existed. I exactly named predetermined judicial fate in my briefas this is an example of the Executive and legislative attempting to circumvent WE

thus the federal court. It is a deliberate act meant to violate the separation ofpowers thus give judicial power to those the founders said are most dangerous:

The legislative department is everywhere extending the sphere of its activity, and

drawing all power into its impetuous vortex, Madison, Federalist 48. Thecorporation US makes it seem as if We, the People have a voice in the reasoningand application of the law but the People do not as it is a done deal; that is, theCorporation US was never NOT going to enter this treaty thus they knew to authoran act that presupposes it and that then is a denial of informed consent amongother things. It is forced on the People as WE had no opportunity to volunteerwithfull consent. WE can never know if WE would have volunteered to conduct thisexperiment had WE been informed. My true belief is: We would have volunteeredBUT as soon as there were no more benefits to be had the People would have

demanded that we fine tune the application and/or abandon this model altogetherbased upon the People acting as soon as 1871 after first being incorporated in1868; also the reason to release all officers of the Government from liability is nomore thus the Trust as it exists today has out lived its purpose. You can never goback in time and make up that five month disparity as it is now history thus all youcan and may do? Change it in the now thus address Obamas unconstitutionalelection and do so supporting the bad math of this treaty with the bad math ofBush V Gore as SCOTUS acted for wholly different reasoning than the designersof the early trust and the later IMF, as SCOTUS did not act in any way for profit oras it is being paid or will be paid in the future. To do this? You must then have avolunteer ME who understands these complex legal issues and then can andwill undo this Gordian Knot in consideration of ALL of the involved parties even

the private busniesses and so unite the trust seats and the legal seats named inour Constitution as one government, of the People, as our interest is a commonlyshared one in which the citizens do profit and some of this profit is in the form ofmonetary reward but do so ethically and morally thus NO CONFLICT and WE allwin. I knew Bush V Gore was the means to do this deliberately or intentionally foreven if they did not know at the time, SCOTUS lived out a law of this universefound within our governing documents that is not written out exactly but as anexisting intrinsic concept; this law is also found within the Federalist Papers mostnotably in Federalist 10 as cause and effect are named exactly but the other

7


8/23

element, the bigger or deeper element is not exactly named. This law of the US? Itis a universal law exactly as the Conservation of Energy and Matter is a law; it isor it has existed since the creation of this universe. It is inviolate or inalienable.An example of an attempt to violate what is in inviolate? If the officers of any Trustact with deliberation to violate that Trust and/or our law in any way you do notreward those unjust persons with more money and then leave those same unjust

persons in charge of the trust! See Wallstreet Collapse and failure of the SEC toprotect the People with no trustees removed. You are then setting up the trust andthe People to fail and to fail on purpose as essentially the officers of the trust havenow been conditioned to believe that they can do what they want when they wantas if injury thus negative consequences do not accrue when that is not the caseas our law differentiates between actual and legal or nature versus man thus ifyou need paper as proof? Look indirectly, at your bank statement or retirementaccount NOT the paper the corrupted officers of the trust are directly generatingas they are not honest and so cannot be trusted. The effect is an internal one thatyou cannot see with the naked eye as it changes who and what we are and soannihilates self-awareness as well as national or liberty awareness; it annihilatesthe concept known as philadelphia, acting as your brothers keeper or extending

your orbit to include or protect as many others as possible with or under US law, apart of which is liberty. It begins with one and spreads to many; it becomesendemic; it is a terminal disease from which no other great government of thepast ever recovered thus we will be first to overcome our own wild successexactly as a person may be made to overcome winning the lottery as every singledecision or action in life is fraught with positive and negative consequenceswhich is why we are to reason or be informed and then act upon that informed,reasoned decision as WE act upon what WE truly believe]:

14th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMFleaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying outtheir business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in

the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protectthemselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and wouldlikely to kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations likeCorp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could becreated, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, whichthing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. OurConstitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they governthemselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern themselves. Such is thefoundational nature of ourConstitutional Republic.

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such privatecorporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to

seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats. Now,having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove thesefacts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share your discovery with us.When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these simplefacts and let no one dissuade you from the truth. The Bottom Line: when you speakabout these private foreign corporations rememberthat is what they are and stopcalling them government. Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fixthem [Susan: Its foreign if it is alien to our law or not a part of the fabric of ouroriginal law as it is written in 1776 and 1787; foreign does not necessarily mean

8
http://window_open%28%27/Government/ConstitutionalRepublic.htm',%20520,430)http://window_open%28%27/Government/ConstitutionalRepublic.htm',%20520,430)


9/23

of or from anotherphysicalnation not your own but means it is unAmerican oroutside US law as authored by the Founders; it is not organic or inborn]. It is farmore important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government andspread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national governments intheir original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreigncorporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money

than there is available in the world. In fact it is impossible for them to pay and that givesus the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right. The process is asimple one. The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why weask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery. That meansthat you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than thesovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATEOF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. And, finally,stop listening to the Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give thesefacts lip service. TeamLaw / Eric Marsden.

You do not seem able or capable to comprehend the law or the point of it nor its

application or if you do you hate me personally and uniquely: I EXACTLY NAMEDPRIVATE MONEY AND FOREIGN INTERESTS, DAVID ROCKEFELLER AS A

LONE PERSON AND AS A BODY OF BELIEF. I NEVER SWORE OUT ANY

ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN AUTHORITY OR CRIMINAL OR CORRUPTED

OR INCAPABLE AKA UNSAFE AUTHORITY, NOT TO YOU, ROBERTS,

CLINTON, BUSH OR OBAMA; I NOT ONCE EVER ACTED FOR ANY FOREIGN

BUSINESS INTERESTS AND INSTEAD FOUGHT A LOCAL WALMART AND

WON AS IT DOES UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUSINESS HERE AND ABROAD,

NAMELY IN CHINA; I NEVER WILLINGLY AND KNOWINGLY SUPPORTED

FOREIGNIZATION IN ANY WAY; I EVEN RAN TOLLS AS ROADS ARE

SOMETIMES LEASED TO FOREIGN NATIONS (EXACTLY AS FOREIGN

NATIONS OWN SOME RED LIGHT CAMERA TECHNOLOGY) PLUS I WAS

TRAFFICKED ACROSS STATE LINES AND SO I DO NOT IN ANY WAY IF

AVOIDABLE SUPPORT MY INJURY. PERIOD. I DID NOT VOTE KNOWINGLY

AND WILLINGLY IN ANY ELECTION PRIOR TO 2000, AS I NEEDED BVG TO

TRANSPIRE THUS I THEN KNEW AND PUT IT ON THE RECORD IN 12/00 IN A

PHILADELPHIA COURT. BEFORE 2000 I COULD NOT NAME WHAT WAS

ENDEMICALLY BROKEN; I COULD NOT NAME SPIRIT or LIBERTY NOMORE UNTIL I WAS ACTUALLY SOLD; THEN I NEEDED TO WITNESS THE

PEOPLES REACTION TO BVG AND WAR IN IRAQ TO KNOW. TODAY? I

WITNESS NORTH KOREA ACTING AS THE AUTHORITY OVER MY PERSON

AND THE US AGREEING AGAINST MY WILL AND IN SPITE OF MY CASE AND

IN SPITE OF EXACTLY WRITTEN US LAW AND US CASE LAW AS JUDGES ARE

9


10/23


11/23


12/23


13/23

OR RATIONAL BASIS AS IT IS ALL ABOUT PERCEPTION AND IS NOT THE

ACTUAL REALITY OF WHAT THE DECLARATION, CONSTITUTION OR PRIOR

SCOTUS RULINGS US CASE LAW - CLEARLY AND EXACTLY STATE. US

CASE LAW? IF YOU HAD ANY ON YOUR SIDE YOUD CITE IT AND NOT RULE

42-4. Actual law as written in 1776 and 1787 and US case law? Put up or shut up as in

cease and desist writing words you can never support in any actual, legal court of law like

SCOTUS and that only serve to prove your own guilt as your words your work self-

evince orprove you to be repugnant thus your [this] order is void : the Constitution's

written nature, and the formal enumeration of the powers of government would be empty

promises if there were no means to measure the actions of the government against the

Constitution, and strike down those found wanting (see Marbury, supra, at 177)

"[c]ertainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming

the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every

such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is

void. As the Act is void then you are null and void. You and your work is repugnant. It

is my protected and exactly worded right to abolish and dissolve you and your work, the

insufferable and unjust form. So then: TeamLaw (and Melvin) is correct regarding the

above facts one of which is the five month disparity between the signing of the Treaty

and the Act itself as you cannot ENACT what does not yet exist! Personally opine all you

wish; you can never reason that disparity away. If there is no legally recognized UN then

there is no act naming the UN as it is not a legal entity or legal authority yet thus we

cannot enact and engage in what is not and sign the Treaty ex post facto. It constitutes

actual ex post facto law or pre facto law, anticipatory but which might never come to be

real law, a done deal w/o any representation, but however you choose to count it the math

as well as the reasoning and application is bad, very bad. If you wholly disregard the 5

month disparity the UN still is not legal as the US has refused to sign its human rights

charter, a treaty, and the only reason for that? Past administrations some of who are unjust

persons within those administrations have openly stated it is because of WOMEN AS

THE EQUALS OF MEN clauses thus the US will not sign that Charter or Treaty and so

does not practice its own exactly written law! Authorities then admit or openly confess

the US as a living Government of People exists in theory only not in practice! They are

claiming that a living government is not our law! The authorities admit they act upon

and for the Corporation US but not upon and for WE, the People. And its reasoning?

Fatally flawed as equal protection is a law of this universe thus these MEN as the

corporate authority, the Office of the Executive, is exclusively male and unjustly so is

openly and actively injuring me only for woman and w/o any legal named reasoning or

13


14/23

cause as the one it names is wholly manufactured as it is not about sovereignty of the US

but is about men controlling women and children, or, buying and selling their persons.

The only legal and logical conclusion based upon the actual facts or actual reality, as it is

now not as you personally want it to be to then avoid this case , US law, exact words and

good or correct math as well as science and US case law is: Im the acting, legal

President and Commander of original jurisdiction and upon my appearance in

person in SCOTUS I then make John Roberts the acting, legal Chief Justice of

original jurisidction as well as the currently sitting Justices legal as SCOTUS is the

lone institution besides myself that has not been corrupted or has been consistently

self-correcting aka self-adjudicating thus is still in line, LAWFUL, or exists as

intended as written by its creators: The Original Founders including Marshall (all

of them) and our Creator aka what came before the Declaration and Constitution .

See A Summary View On The Rights Of British America by Jefferson. Ideally you want

to unseat the crooks like the judges on this very bench as they came to exist now (but not

necessarily as they were born or as they were when first they sat) and then reseat them

with ethical and moral persons. Or you need all currently sitting officers to be

accountable and responsible and then act to fulfill their duties under our law in both letter

and spirit and this must then begin at the top, Executive, and then at the bottom, lone

citizen or voter. You do not want two governments; you do not want a shadow one that is

not what was intended or one split in two with divided interests and you do not want

foreigners or crooks running this nation and killing We the People spiritually and/or

physically. You want to export US law as it is elegant not import socialism, Marxism,

fascism, materialism, militarism, communism, despotism, dictatorship or religious

extremism. You also do not want to institute STUPID, AFRAID and UNWILLING as

qualifications to qualify as President or to qualify as voter. I unincorporated us by

dissolving all kinds of personal, mistaken and at times false belief and the inserted or

entrenched corruption of the law thus liability does indeed ensue as you knew as I told

you. Some of it was legal at the time, it seemed to be then and did work then but now it

does not, and some of it never was legal and so is not now legal. Legally you never were

incorporated and me? I never agreed. Then whatever that thing was that you referred to as

a just government? Even you, the US in the form of the Solicitor General, defaulted on

11/05/08 after I informed it of the fact and law plus the correct application of US law to

all persons across the board. Even you, the corporate US, could not stand that ugly,

clumsy thing you only called a government of the People when it is not. Is a federal

judiciary beholden to Corporate US, deriving its power from the Corporation and not the

People, even remotely constitutional? No and even Hamilton would balk at that idea.

14


15/23


16/23

As you are claiming Roberts himself and his action is w/o merit? That he too is crazy

and cannot read? That like you some disembodied being put a pen in his hand and a

gun to his head and forced him to write "DENIED" any and all protection of the law?

You made a mistake: Roberts never said any such thing. The appearance of the paper

and computer generated docket only makes it seem as if. He's not mentally ill and can and

does reason. You, unlike he, wrote "MOOT". Exactly. YES, I AGREE AS WE ALL DO:

THE DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION IS NOW MOOT AS OFFICERS LIKE

YOU RENDER IT MOOT VIA YOUR ACTIONS THUS I WIN AGAIN AS YOU

CONCURRED! YOURE MY PROOF OF DEATH. You, an other federal court do not

have John Roberts reason; you are not acting as John Marshall as he is. You do have

another choice that is now available as Roberts and I provided it; we created the

opportunity for you. My true belief is: This court means to place the burden of petitioning

SCOTUS on me and is confident it can escape liability by claiming it acted and only

failing to act is a crime. Not in this instance.

2. I have a volunteer. It was not humanly possible for him to act before he read my brief as

SCOTUS denied him informed consent thus now he can and may. Upon re-entry to

SCOTUS? He or any willing volunteer then joins my case thus appearing in the caption.

That makes him Vice President. He's a voter acting in his official capacity as a voter as well

as an individual. If he chooses not to continue? Next person to get to me and volunteer

wins IF they name their case and so every element. Upon our win he then gets his name on

the ballot for President in 2012 as a candidate independent from me or in his ownright. This then makes us a brand new case of original jurisdiction. I have reasoned I can

enter several ways to make it ORIGINAL as I ruled all citizens were ignorant not guilty

like you are as you are an expert lawyer now exploiting your knowledge a part of which is

life experience thus abusing your power. The ignorant now not so ignorant are to get one

opportunity. Thus, you want to reconsider if you exist as a judge and as a living, breathing

human being let alone an American as SCOTUS is waiting for me as our the People. You?

You are not a foreigner thus you cannot escape the death penalty by claiming you are not

bound by the Constitution. You are or else you would not have acted to cash a money order

that read TRIBUTE across it and you would not have then written DENIED and MOOT.

You produced several pieces of paper claiming that you are bound by the Declaration and

Constitution. I not only want a refund but the voters and I want a refund with interest: you

gone as that is in our best interest. And someone has volunteered to help me make that

happen sooner rather than later. For good measure I secured one other volunteer: A man

who cannot read so could not know of the SCOTUS action or the reasons why BVG and

16


17/23

Obama are illegal and in violation of the law. He is not to blame for his injury as it was

beyond his control until now. Until me, Susan.

3. You may not issue an ORDER that applies to me uniquely as a 20 page limit does based

upon my unique facts which you yourself read thus own or issue an order that instructs aclerk to commit what is a violation of the Constitution and is a criminal act known as

treason. You knew as hardcore fact that such an order is not constitutional but went and did

it anyway. I exactly named this exact action with exact words thus you read my motion and

my brief as well as Marbury so owned this knowledge, that it is unconstitutional and a

violation of my fully vested, protected rights as well as an overturning of past federal

precedent set by SCOTUS aka US case law, but then acted to do it. This is not so complex;

it is basic reasoning you learn as a child not in law school. Science says that you own a

conscience at about age 4; my own life proves this is a fact as at age 4 I owned the

knowledge of right and wrong. But if you were not raised to know? Law school and

then life taught you, as you are a FEDERAL judge not a state judge. You would not exist if

not for the federal interpretation and concept of right and wrong known as Marbury, as

if not for Marbury? No constitutional authority as an institution. No redress. Marbury then

led to all of it, and to USC 1331. Marbury birthed you, as you exist today.Marbury is

you, applies to you and makes it possible for the people to then empower you. You

cannot be separated from Marbury. Marbury V Madison clearly states all people are

each accountable and responsible thus if that order is obeyed in open and direct violation of

the letter of the law or its spirit or both and which in violation of Marbury? The clerk is theliable in addition to you as they are to defy such an order as it itself by its nature is

unconstitutional or is intrinsically, fatally flawed. I clearly stated that this court would not

know liberty as it could not as it was not willing to preserve, protect and defend our law in

my unique case, in the cases of women and in the cases of all ethical or law abiding

Americans, a part of which its spirit aka liberty. This sham of a decision, ruling and order is

evidence rising to proof and the person or people who wrote it? Absolute proof, proof

itself, of all I claimed. No living people acting legally or illegally? No action or no proof.

Dead bodies do not produce cognizant work, paper or otherwise. Are you the judges of this

bench denying your own miserable existence as a corporate entity? Oh thats right! Life

aint so hard for you is it? As you have all of the overly broad power, as you have all of the

tribute and as you have all of the physical comforts you could ask for including a lifetime

appointment and never-ending paycheck as a direct result of tribute. Your children were not

kidnapped and you were not tortured; you just came to participate willingly. KNOWINGLY

is now the federal question. Did these judges know or not? No sane, rational person can

17


18/23

answer no, as this bench had to ignore all of reality to then deny me standing upon any

claim whatsoever. Left to reason this myself? I have only one answer: These judges catered

to everything and everyone except to WE, the people and US law. I am left with only one

answer, an answer that the People named over and over: These judges are afraid of David

Rockefeller, Barack Obama and their ilk the wealthy and currently entrenched persons

acting criminally. They fear the imbalance of power so much so they refuse to confront the

legal issue: DISCRIMINATION OF WOMEN NOW BEING REALIZED AS

DISCRIMINATION OF THE ETHICAL AND/OR VERY INTELLIGENT. Entirely

without merit constitutes a lie, perjury, in this case.

5. The only reason I'm motioning for you to reconsider your reasoning, decision and ruling

or your application of lawlessness and rule but not anything actually written by The

Founders? To reconsider your traitorous idea - the Declaration and Constitution is

DISMISSED and MOOT and so does not apply to you - that harms you firstly and mostly

and which you acted upon? So the process is finally exhausted thus when WE do put you to

death? You cannot cry you did not know or that WE did not inform you. WE did inform

you and you then gave us your informed consent to put you to death for treason. You wrote

it down and signed it. Your true belief is, or so I allege, based upon the proof known as

your work as your work is you as this is constitutional law: "This citizens are stupid, weak,

lazy slobs who hate women especially bitches like Susan thus I can so I will; Im safe from

any negative consequences."You'd be wrong as the Creator will take care of you if you

drop dead before we get to you and having to choose between me and you WHO do youthink the People will choose? As life is proof? FOUR TIMES I DID ALL I COULD TO

GET ARRESTED AND FOUR TIMES I WAS NOT. So far the Secret Service, FBI, local

police and US Marshal has chosen their own lives over yours. They have not chosen me but

they have not chosen you either. They were waiting to see your ruling and order. I told you:

The Navy wished me luck when I STOOD IT DOWN; THE NAVY SAID IF ANYONE

CANWE KNOW YOU, SUSAN, WILL. The Navys job is NOT to make it easy. Ideally they

arent to go out of their way to harm me but hey, I reason the Navy acts in direct proportion

to the actual, legal threat that I am to the old and now failed model. I quoted US law and

case law and they told me WE ARE NOT AWARE A COUP HAS OCCURRED. I fact

checked the Navy: did it know of Brown II? Yes. Did it know what this, reality of BVG and

Election 08, then constituted? No. Congressional Res. 511 did not exist then. I said,

knowing the paper trail is well hidden and even nonexistent, I believe you as you might not

be able to know. Ill prove it by standing down the offices of Chief Justice and President.

The Navy said, Good luckand if it is possible WE knowyou will. I told officer Bob M. of

18


19/23

JAG: And when I do? Your name, Bob M., is at the top of my very, very short list. YOU not

the Navy. I never spoke to THE Navy, the top person according to chain of command

theory. I wrote to him in the form of an emergency application and petition in support of it

as he is JOHN ROBERTS and he acted for me.

6. What do you know? I did not need 20 pages but I took them. Actually I only needed one

sentence: On 03/22/08 the Solicitor General of the US waived your interest (the interest of

the judges and clerks reading this) and waived your right to vote, act as a judge, express

your opinion on anything or to collect a salary and all of your rights (the rights of the

judges and clerks reading this). Legally, you have no interest and no right as you made no

objection and on August 3rd, 2009, upheld that waiver. SCOTUS served you twice, 07-9804 &

08-6622, and twice you failed to answer or to object in any way. You never had power and

authority over me and still do not. When offered it over yourself? You failed to claim it. You,

BLACK, CARNES, and MARCUS did not object and just upheld the waiver of your interest

and right. You even said the law or reality - it's inalienable - is MOOT. In your case YES but

in mine? NO. Unlike you I vested my interest and my right by entering SCOTUS directly and

then coming back here as I never entered this court before and as I, the case, never left

SCOTUS only the paper with my name printed on it did. Jurisdiction and issue did not

magically change as our law did not nor did I quit and/or fail. The law is any actual power and

authority you might come to have in this world? YOU GET IT FROM ME OR WE THEPEOPLE NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! You do not give me anything. This actual

power and actual authority? It is born of the exactly named Creator thus is inalienable. You

can and maygive it away but not take itfrom me: You gave your power and authority away to

me, SCOTUS and the People.

7. I not once ever wanted to become President. I had higher aspirations: Supreme Court

Justice. I was like a laser beam solely focused on that one institution and how to get in on my

own, as I knew there was a door no person could see. Jesus toldme he broke in for me. Jesus

told me that he set a place for me. The Founders repeated this to me over and over. They fullyadmitted: The only proof we have is our own existence as an independent nation. You might

fail us.Susan, you of all people cannot fail us! They did not say this exactly they said it with

symbols or clues as they enshrined the truth of who and what they are as people all over the

place in letters, books, rulings, currency, maps, portraits, schools, flags, architecture, words

etc. etc. You see a red, white and blue flag while I see, hear and feel Abraham and the

19


20/23

promise God made that came true for him, then Washington and now me. You see a leaky

ceiling where I see actual stars: Polaris and Orion. You see a building and a filing system

while I see a living institution, the Library of Congress, with a plaque that makes me laugh:

Jefferson as he created it with his own books, books that now bear a Library of Congress

code number. You see actual money where I see Hamiltons face but I think SAFETY and

feel, This new multicolored junk looks like it came out of a monopoly game; it may as well

have for its worthless. Your reality is false; it is not my own as I learned to see past the

physical world as the physical is all an illusion; physical things symbolize the truth. Physicists

who are doing nothing more than searching for God told me exactly to check the pulse rate of

the respiring universe. So I knew you are crazy as you are looking at THINGS and not

considering the PEOPLE, or, HUMAN HEARTS. The truth of the Founders is their mind and

human heart, still living. You can and do hear it and feel it if you listen. Its the emotional

result of their grand experiment that I knew to look for as you cannot see emotion but liberty

and safety are emotions and are rights. They made us safe. You made me unsafe. I changed my

awareness of the pulse rate of the respiring nation aka the People...I began to follow the First

We The People or the Delaware Indians as their actual name means We, the People and then

Jesus accidentally by design by following John Adams as I cannot hear, see or feel what I am

way too close to, a body of belief known as Thomas Jefferson. I know they lock the door at

night. I know the building is guarded. I know lawyers are hogging all the seats. Thats your

reality, a fantasy in your head based upon past events and past failure to act not what is now as

I acted as did Roberts. My reality? Lawyers acting as if they are hogs is against the spirit of

the law.That was then this is now.Im already in!No lock, guard or lawyer can or may keep

me out as long as I act in my own defense and always have an answer for Roberts. Later I

began defending The Founders as the name Patriot Act constitutes defamation of character

as proven by those aforementioned Bush memos. Are these guys nuts to act upon the belief

that they can keep me, the product or culmination of all who came before me, out? That you

can fine tune history to then pervert the law thus overthrow the People? Wakey, wakey! The

Founders built it into the design: our law is designed to include you as when The Founders

open a door and all 13 original states ratify it no modern federal judge or corporation can close

it. If the door is not there? The tool to make the dooris. And if that door is created, opened and

so there it is w/o any lock but you do not know how to walk through it? Or people keep

stopping you from entering? You have written and unwritten instructions! Copy a play out of

the Founders book, which is their lives or if you prefer the Federalist Papers: Act, act as if you

belong there and people will believe you do...or actually disguise yourself with math in the

form of words not numbers and vice versa. By the time they recognize the truth of your

argument in light of the facts and US law? Its too late - youre in! Or: Say you know how

20


21/23

and then act, take that step, faking it all the way if you have to as life will eventually prove

you wrong or right and the only real master you ever have is experience. Addicts call this

faking it until you are making it making US law and history that is! Fortunately for me I

was born a legal prodigy. This nation does not recognize legal prodigies, as those in charge

truly believe you cannot know something if an anointed authority keeps the knowledge from

you. You do not understand reasoning is inborn andacquired. You, a lawyer, truly believe

you have to learn the law in a law school or it is impossible as it is an ultra-exclusive, closed

club. Do musical prodigies need music lessons?No! I, like a genius musician, am born with

this skill, a human quality and a human ability. How did that first black or Native lawyer, a

SCOTUS case, come to be? They did it on their own, thats how. You victimized them until

they knew to then act in the opposite direction, as an opposing force against you, thus

overcoming the made up barriers which exist in your mind and within your heart but not

within US law. The other reason this nation lost out on me the prodigy and still does not

recognize me as a genius? Stendhal told me: ALL WOMEN BORN GENIUSES ARE LOST

TO THE PUBLIC GOOD. How is this good for the public??? It defies reason and our law,

if not the sitting officers, is reasonable as reason is the very nature of its design. You

know what else is? Intention, as all of this is intentional. The Founders meantfor me to

happen!

Conclusion

Motion to reconsider granted so Susan's ruling is upheld: BLACK, CARNES andMARCUS are MOOT as they are guilty of treason. The death penalty may now be

carried out IF and only IF they do not revoke the waiver of their rights by hearing this

case in person orissuing an order AGAINST Obama, Roberts and the US not against

reason thus a against our Constitution. NO OTHER CHOICES ARE

CONSTITUTIONAL OR EVEN REMOTELY REASONABLE OR RATIONAL AND A

FAILURE TO CHOOSE ONE OF THESE IS THEN TREASON IN THIS CASE. AN

ORDER CITING RULE AND THE WORDS DISMISSED MOOT AND

ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL ACT. It rises to

treason as this bench now knows the facts of US history and the UN/IMF thus knows its

own seats are only made legal or become constitutional upon hearing this case in person

or issuing a ruling against Obama; it must read Obama defendant and

unconstitutional in a fashion that unequivocally states Obama, his facts and his actions,

is repugnant thus void thus so is his election. It might read Roberts it might not as like

a bead sliding across an abacus this court can address Roberts injury as his rights have

21


22/23

been violated and he was the victim of a crime as he was used to make an attempt to

corrupt the Supreme Court w/o any person ever knowing but that attempt failed as he

acted against it, not me, when informed by naming him as a pro se plaintiff not a

defendant thus ruling WITH HIM AND FOR WE THE PEOPLE. In this manner this

bench rules itself to be NOT GUILTY OF TREASON BUT ONLY ACCOUNTABLE

FOR ANY RESULTING PERSONAL INJURY. A federal judge is to know: The case

becomes Herbert and or with Roberts or all pro se litigants, against Obama and the US,

those who are not pro se, as all citizens failed us when they failed to reason their vote and

Obama/Biden has a lawyer, Bob Bauer. He and his firms interests conflict with the

Peoples.

By their very design federal judges are to be intentionally constitutional and of good

behavior. Is your defense that you never, ever read the Federalist Papers not even when I

printed them out for you?Federalist 78, Hamilton: To avoid an arbitrary discretion in

the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by strict rules and

precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case

that comes before them; and it will readily be conceived from the variety of

controversies which grow out of the folly and wickedness of mankind, that the

records of those precedents must unavoidably swell to a very considerable bulk, and

must demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent knowledge of them.

Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill

in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges. And making the proper

deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature, the number must be still

smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the requisite

knowledge...Upon the whole, there can be no room to doubt that the convention

acted wisely in copying from the models of those constitutions which have

establishedgood behavioras the tenure of their judicial offices...

I will let the citizens know the outcome or consequences of BLACK, CARNES and

MARCUS own bad ideas and acts that thankfully are not our law. BLACK, CARNES

and MARCUS do not constitute US law at work but their own whim and will or their

prejudices and fears at work. This ruling in the form of a motion to reconsider constitutes

an arrest warrant upon a charge of treason as well as other, lesser acts of sedition and

subversion. It remains an arrest warrant until or unless it becomes a new decision, ruling

and order that is based upon our law and is made in consideration of all of the facts.

22


23/23

susan v obama: we're moot? motion to reconsider

Documents