susanne c. moser, ph.d. - usc dana and david dornsife ...40 am group exercise developing...
TRANSCRIPT
Susanne C. Moser, Ph.D.
Sea Grant Climate Network
March 13, 2013
© 2013 - Training slides developed by Susanne C. Moser, Ph.D., all rights reserved
Your name
From [State or region]
One thing that makes me a great communicator
One thing I really want to learn today is…
… in 140 characters (i.e. 30 seconds) or less!
Academic… or not Senior…or not
Science, outreach, extension, facilities or program management, workforce development, facilitation, technical assistance, research oversight
Ecology, law, engineering, planning, climate, hazards, political science, communication
"To be truly radical is to
make hope possible,
rather than despair
convincing."
- Raymond Williams
(Welsh academic, novelist and critic)
© 2013 - Training slides developed by Susanne C. Moser, Ph.D., all rights reserved
“Said is not heard; Heard is not understood; Understood is not agreed; Agreed is not implemented.” (unknown Dutch source)
© 2013 - Training slides developed by Susanne C. Moser, Ph.D., all rights reserved
Time Activity Topics
9:00 am Welcome & Introductions Who is here, something you’re really excited about
9:40 am Group exercise Developing audience-specific communication strategies
10:15 am Lecture, Q&A Foundation: Americans’ climate change attitudes
11:00 am Break
11:15am Lecture, Q&A Foundation: American perceptions of impacts, adaptation
11:30 am Group exercises Theory of change: audiences and communication goals
12:30 pm Lunch
1:30 pm Demo, pair exercise Role and power of emotions, sense of place
2:00 pm Group exercise Frames, mental models and messages
2:30 pm Break
2:45 pm Discussion, group exercise Messengers and communication channels
3:15 pm Overview, practices Uncertainty, dealing with skeptics and contrarians
4:00 pm Grand finale Present your communication strategies
4:30 pm Evaluation Resources, feedback and adjourn
Participate fully, don’t stand by
In small-group discussions, build on and explore others’ contributions
Be here (cell phones on mute, minimize distractions)
Bio breaks, scheduled and as needed
Enjoy!
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
~8 people per group
Acquaint yourself with the scenario for your group
Discuss and develop a communications strategy that is appropriate and effective for this audience and situation
You have 20 minutes
Then we debrief
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Developing an audience-specific communications strategy
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
• Support for high-level leadership and policy
• Behavior change and civic engagement • Actively doing their part in reducing their own
emissions • Actively doing their part in reducing risks from
climate change impacts
Deeper, transformative change (values, social norms, consciousness, points of views)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
For communication to be effective, i.e., to facilitate an intended societal response or desired social change, it must accomplish two things:
(1) sufficiently elevate and maintain the motivation to change a practice or policy
&
(2) contribute to lowering barriers and resistance to doing so
Communication
Motivation Resistance/
Barriers
Social
Change &
Action
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
1. Identify and get to know your audience. 2. Define clear communication goals. 3. Frame the issue appropriately. 4. Use the right messenger and appropriate
channels and venues for your communication.
5. Empower and enable the audience to act.
6. Follow-up. 7. Evaluate.
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Most Americans accept that climate change is happening, but understanding on causality still split, less certain
Question wording makes a difference
There was a big fuss over the dip in 2009/2010, still in recovery
Long-term polling suggests we have made little progress since 1988 or 1997
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2012b) © 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Source: The Strategy Team (2012)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2012b)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed Majority Believes in Human Causation (but fragile knowledge)
Seriousness of climate change as a problem is not firm, not growing
Source: The Strategy Team (2012)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Public concern is fickle, not particularly strong, nor growing
Source: The Strategy Team (2012)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2013)
Views on the scientific consensus not consistent with reality
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Need for action now and types of action are unclear, underestimated and public is skeptical of success
Broadly, differences along ideological and gender lines
Clear differences: ideological/political leanings, cultural worldviews, gender
Less consistent: age, ethnicity
Audience segmentation useful starting point
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Alarmed Concerned Cautious Disengaged Doubtful Dismissive
Based on periodic surveys and analysis by the Yale University Project on Climate Change and George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change Communication
Highest belief in global warming
Human causation
Greatest concern
Most motivated
Lowest belief in global warming
Natural cause, if at all
Least concerned
Least motivated
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2013)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
Sources: Leiserowitz et al. 2008 Maibach et al. (2009) Leiserowitz et al .(2013)
Nationwide Conviction Trends (in %)
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
06/07 10/08 01/10 06/10 05/11 03/12
Yes 71 69 57 61 64 66
No 10 11 20 18 18 14
D/K 19 18 23 21 18 20
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2013) © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al (2013) © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2009, 2012)
11%
43%
30%
16%
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al (2013)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2012b)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2013)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al (2009) © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: SEE Innovation Project for Improved Environmental Coverage (2013)
Leaders
Extreme
events
News
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al (2013 (l), 2009) (r) © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
“Culture is prior to facts in the cognitive sense that what citizens believe about the empirical consequences of [certain problems or] policies derives from their cultural worldviews.“
Kahan and Braman (2006)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Leiserowitz et al (2009)
4
3
2
1
Individualistic values
(developed from tabulated data)
Alarmed
Concerned Cautious
Disengaged
Doubtful
Dismissive
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Social-psychological mechanisms:
• Identity-protective cognition
• Biased information assimilation and polarization
• Cultural credibility heuristic - when trusted source
confirms one’s beliefs > polarization
- when trusted source contradicts one’s beliefs > depolarization
• Cultural identity affirmation - greater open-mindedness,
depolarization
Quite stable,
polarized
debate
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
• Very little understanding of international or national policy proposals
• Limited understanding of the magnitude of the needed solutions
• Little knowledge of the range of possible solutions
• Little sense of priorities of what would make the biggest difference in pers. choices
• Overwhelm and futility
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Die-hard Optimists
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (2012, 2013)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Humans can reduce global
warming and we are going to do so
successfully
Humans could reduce global
warming, but it's unclear at this
point whether we will do what's
needed
Humans could reduce global warming but people aren't
willing to change their behavior, so we're not going
to
Humans can't reduce global
warming, even if it's happening
Global warming isn't happening
Pe
rce
nt
Can and Will the World Reduce Global Warming?
Doubtful
Cynics Fatalists
Deniers
96%
© 2
013
- T
rain
ing
slid
es d
evel
op
ed b
y S
usa
nn
e C
. Mo
ser,
Ph
.D.,
all
rig
hts
re
serv
ed
[0-8% 1-72% 2-30% 1-58% 0-57%]
Source: Moser (2009). Good Morning America! The Explosive Awakening of the US
to Adaptation. Available at: http://www.csc.noaa.gov/publications/need-for-adaptation.pdf
Estimates 2009
-2012 based on
Boykoff (2013)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Renaming what we’ve always done
Disaster risk management
Water conservation
Wetland restoration
Trying to find a resonant term
Preparing/preparedness, readiness, sustainability
Translating adaptation into familiar terms
Planning ahead
Upgrading infrastructure
Moving out of the floodplain © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
"The sea level rise that we've
experienced in our community has had an impact on our tax base, lower property values, municipal services and
maintenance of infrastructure. … So I think it's very important that we start dealing with the issue that we can't ignore, because we see the impact on a daily basis.“
Renee Cahoon
Mayor of Nags Head, NC (10/23/09, ClimateWire)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Paul Krashefski, Broward County Natural Resources Planning and Management Division
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Based on data by Leiserowitz et al. (2011) © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
34%... and growing
Source: Leiserowitz et al. (Sept 2011)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
A large and growing majority of Americans believe that global warming is making weather events worse
A majority (55%) of Americans say they have thought some or a great deal (55%) about preparing for a natural disaster, but only ~a third have a plan/kit Source: Leiserowitz et al. (Sept 2012a)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Based on data by Leiserowitz et al. (2011) © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Source: Based on data by Leiserowitz et al. (2011)
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
77% think climate change is a very or somewhat serious threat
Of the 10 national issues about which residents are “very concerned”, climate change ranks 9th, and sea-level rise 10th (and highest percentage of people who are “not at all concerned”)
Same pattern when asked about environmental issues, but some can be easily linked to climate change and sea-level rise (flooding, wetland loss, water and air quality)
Concern is higher for those in immediate coastal areas, and those who feel they know more about the issue
Middle-aged and older people are more concerned than younger ones
Source: http://www.coastal.udel.edu/ © 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
The risks aren’t local yet for many
Global-local disconnect with existential threats
Intense emotional responses when climate risks “come home”
Interpretive lenses
Framing effects
Missing voices, trusted messengers
Adaptation language still unfamiliar, not resonant, largely untested
Fear of local officials about publicly addressing adaptation in their communities
Organized resistance to local adaptation planning efforts
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
Has significant explanatory power to understand what has happened over the last 20 years in climate change communication and public polarization
Highly relevant to adaptation and how to communicate them Impacts may be experienced as threats
Solutions may be experienced as threats
Adaptive responses may or may not fit into what is acceptable to people
© 2
013 -
Tra
inin
g s
lides d
evelo
ped b
y S
usanne C
. M
oser,
Ph.D
., a
ll rights
reserv
ed
See: Dan Kahan and colleagues
http://www.culturalcognition.net/