sustainability & climate action strategy 25 year long range transportation plan ... bio-fuel...
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainability & Climate Action StrategySustainability & Climate Action Strategy
8| 2 | 2011 | Los Angeles, California
Timothy Papandreou
Deputy Director Planning & Policy
SFMTA Today
• Multi-modal transportation agency; Planner, Designer, Builder, Operator:
– Transit, Paratransit, Pedestrian, Bicycle & Taxi Networks
– Street Network, Signals & Systems
– Parking Supply & Management – Parking Supply & Management
– Station & Neighborhood Area development review
– Transportation Demand Management
– Street Operations Enforcement
s
3Multi-modal integration allows for full accounting
s
>15% people >25% jobs
San Francisco Sustainable Growth Challenges
2035 Population & Employment
Growth focused in Priority Development Areas
Policy Shift: City of Sustainable Mobility Choices
70%
60%
50%
40%
Mode Split
Mode split goals to manage sustainable growth
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Goal
30%
20%
10%
0%
Mode Split
Integrated Data
• Public Health
• Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Analysis
• Active Transportation
• Demand Management
7Increasing systems complexity of data driven analysis
• Demand Management
• Land-Use
• Energy
• Water
• Waste Management
• Social Equity
8Transit core capacity and modal priority analysis
99
Integrated Modeling: City of Short & Frequent Trips
Regional
Sustainable
Communities
Strategy
City
Climate &
Sustainability
Strategy
25 year Long Range
Transportation
Plan
20 year Long Range
Operating
Plan
Sustainability and Climate goals operationalized
10 year Short Range
Transit
Plan
5 year
Strategic
Plan
Integrated performance measures leverage funds
5 year
Capital
Program
2 year Cap &
Ops
Budget
AnnualPerformance
Work
Plans
Annual
Mobility
Progress
Report
11SFMTA Plans are Transportation Chapter in City Climate Plan
SF Municipal Carbon Footprint Analysis: 7.5 tons Co2/capita
Sustainability Strategies: Agency Initiatives
Strategy
Performance Analysis
Framework
Carbon Boundaries
Framework
Setting clear frameworks for analysis
SF Transportation Carbon Footprint: 90% Automobiles
2.5 tons Co2/ capita 1 ton Co2/ capita
SF Co2e Per Passenger Mile
Modal Analysis- bike, walk, transit is most efficient
Large SUV/Truck
Compact vehicle: Gasoline
Hybrid/Electric
Electric (fossil fuels generation)
Bio-fuel
Vehicle Analysis –There is no carbon neutral car
0 60 125 180 250 375 gm/km
0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1¼ lb/mile
Electric (renewable generation)
CO2 By Vehicle Propulsion type
Climate Goals Sustainability Goals
Electric/Low
Carbon Cars
Reduce Energy
Consumption
Reduce Energy
Consumption
Reduce Parking
Reduce Co2e
PollutionReduce all
Pollution
Strategy
Clarifying & ground-truthing policy objectives
Reduce Traffic
Fatalities
Reduce Parking
Infrastructure
Demand
Reduce Peak
Travel Demand
19
Analysis of location & context of GHG emissions
202011 Climate Action Strategy
21Strategy 1: Travel Choice & Information
22Strategy 2: Demand Pricing
23Strategy 3: Transit-Oriented Development
24Strategy 4: Transit Improvements
25
26Strategy 5: Complete Streets
Pedestrian to Vehicle Exposure 62.5 ft
Street Design & Operation impacts Sustainability
1ft
barrier
Pedestrian to Vehicle Exposure 36 ft
36 Feet Roadway Width
82.5 Feet Property Line to Property Line Width
17 ft sidewalk
(Transit Amenities)
Complete & Sustainable Streets enhances all users
9.5 ft Travel
Lane
9.5 ft Travel
Lane
Sustainable Mobility-Walking
Reclaiming the streets for people and local economy
Expansion of Bicycling as cost effective mobility
32Strategy 6: Electric Vehicles Infrastructure
33Analysis positions Agency for advocacy and policy
Regional vs. San Francisco goals/contribution
Government, Business & Community roles made clear
Government, Business & Community roles made clear
Hard work gets rewarded
