sustainable materials management in...

30
Brian Stafki Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Sustainable Materials Management in Oregon What is it? How did we get here? What does it mean for Oregon? Brian Stafki October 16, 2018 Recycling Association of Minnesota and Solid Waste Association of North America

Upload: others

Post on 17-Mar-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Sustainable Materials Management in Oregon

What is it? How did we get here? What does it mean for Oregon?

Brian Stafki

October 16, 2018

Recycling Association of Minnesota and Solid Waste Association of North America

2

3

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Recycling in OregonWhy do we recycle?

FOR INTERNAL USE 4

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Recycling benefits the environment

5

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Benefits of waste recovery (Oregon, 2016)

6

• Prevented the use of 27 trillion BTUs of energy

o Equivalent to 2.8 percent of Oregon’s total energy use

• Reduced 2.9 million metric tons of carbon dioxide

equivalents

o Equivalent to annual tailpipe emissions from ~690,000

passenger cars

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Oregon and SMMIs there more than recycling?

7

8

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Sustainable materials management defined

9

“Materials management is an approach to serving human needs by using and reusing resources most productively and sustainably throughout their life cycles, generally minimizing the amount of materials involved and all the associated environmental impacts.”

— U.S. E.P.A.

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Material life cycle

10

material extraction

and processing

manufacturing international transportation

end-of-life management home and business use retail distribution

domestic

transportation

Production

Consumption

Recycling is necessary, but insufficient

11

2006 U.S. GHG inventory

with 32% recovery (MSW)

provision

of

materials

42%

buildings

transporting

people

appliances

& devices 2006 U.S. GHG inventory with

very high recovery rate

(~95% MSW + >70% C&D)

“savings” 6%

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Oregon adopts SMM

Vision: By 2050, Oregonians produce and use materials responsibly

while conserving resources, protecting the environment and living

well.

12

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Recycling is necessary, but insufficient

13

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

37% recycling rate

62% recycling rate

No

rmalized

im

pact

(baseli

ne w

/37%

recyclin

g =

100)

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Recycling is necessary, but insufficient

14

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

37% recycling rate

62% recycling rate

62% recycling rate, lightweighted

No

rmal

ize

d im

pac

t(b

ase

line

w/3

7%

re

cycl

ing

= 1

00

)

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Recycling is necessary, but insufficient

15

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

37% recycling rate

62% recycling rate

62% recycling rate, lightweighted

tap water (worst case)

No

rmal

ize

d im

pac

t(b

ase

line

w/3

7%

re

cycl

ing

= 1

00

)

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Recycling is necessary, but insufficient

16

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

37% recycling rate

62% recycling rate

62% recycling rate, lightweighted

tap water (worst case)

tap water (best case)

No

rmal

ize

d im

pac

t(b

ase

line

w/3

7%

re

cycl

ing

= 1

00

)

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Oregon’s approach

17

Reduce

generation

(reduce, reuse)

Increase recovery

(recycle, compost,

limited energy

recovery)

18

19

20

44% recycled content (aggregate)

8% recycled content(slag)

292 283

191

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3

kg

CO

2e

44%

recycled

content

(aggregate)8%

recycled

content

(slag)

0%

recycled

content

Example: Concrete

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Preventing the wasting of good food

22

Wasted Food

Preventing the wasting of food

23

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 24

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

steel

Beer Product Environmental Footprint

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Not all recovery is equally beneficial

26

27

28

Questions?

29

Brian Stafki │ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Materials Managementconserving resources · protecting the environment · living well

Brian Stafki | [email protected]

30