sutter butte flood control agencysutterbutteflood.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/board-agenda... ·...

SBFCA Board Agenda August 14, 2013

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency

Board of Directors Agenda Summary August 14, 2013

1 p.m. Regular Meeting

Meeting Location: City of Yuba City Council Chambers - 1201 Civic Center Boulevard, Yuba City, CA

The agenda is posted in the building of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency at 1227 Bridge Street Suite C, Yuba City, and at the Sutter County Library, 750 Forbes Avenue, Yuba City. The agenda summary, backup materials, and approved minutes are also posted on the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency website at sutterbutteflood.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda and submitted to the Board of Directors after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Clerk at 1227 Bridge Street, Yuba City, during normal business hours. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need disability related modifications or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact Sarah Modeste at the Sutter Butte Flood Control Office, 1227 Bridge Street, Suite C, Yuba City, CA 95993 or [email protected]. Requests must be made one full business day before the start of the meeting.

County of Sutter James Gallagher Stan Cleveland Alts. Jim Whiteaker

County of Butte Bill Connelly Steve Lambert

City of Yuba City John Dukes Kash Gill Alts. John Buckland, Tej Maan

City of Live Oak Gary Baland Alt. Ray Rogers

City of Gridley Jeff Draper Alt. Frank Hall

City of Biggs Bo Sheppard Alt. John Busch

Levee District 1 Francis Silva Al Montna Alt. Barbara LeVake

Levee District 9 David Lamon Chris Schmidl Alt. David Schmidl

Persons wishing to address the Board during consideration of matters listed on the agenda will be allowed to do so. Testimony should always begin with the speaker giving his or her name and place of residence. Requests for assistive listening devices or other accommodations, such as interpretive services, should be made through the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency office at (530) 755-9859. Requests should be made at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible.

1 PM REGULAR MEETING/CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance

CLOSED SESSION 1) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Govt. Code section 54956.8

Agency negotiator(s): McElhern/O'Regan Properties and negotiating parties: John and Christie Rogers (APN 025-050-022) Richard Bill and Jon Bill, as Trustees of the Bill Family Management Trust (APN 025-050-002) Stephen and Lori Kramer (APN 025-180-023) Teresa Frawley as Trustee of the Teresa Frawley Trust (APN 025-130-043) William & Patricia Jaeger (APN 51-530-021) Blane Moffit (APN 025-130-042) Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment.

mailto:[email protected]

SBFCA Board Agenda August 14, 2013

CONSENT CALENDAR The Consent Calendar groups together those items which are considered noncontroversial or for which prior policy direction has been given to staff and that require only routine action by the Board. The Chair will advise the audience that the matters may be adopted in total by one motion; however, the Board may, at its option or upon request of a member of the public, consider any matter separately. 1. Approval of the minutes for the July 10, 2013 Board Meeting

2. Approval of resolution for the levy and collection of fiscal year 2013-14 assessments for the Sutter

Butte Flood Control Agency Assessment District in Sutter and Butte counties PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION & ACTION ITEMS 3. Receive and file monthly financial report

4. Approval of ICF Task Order 9 amendment

5. Approval for travel to Washington D.C. to attend USACE Civil Works Review Board for Sutter

Feasibility Study

6. Authorize the Executive Director to Submit Grant Applications to the CA Department of Water Resources under the Yuba Feather Flood Protection Program

INFORMATIONAL AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL ITEMS 7. Program/Project Update

8. Other reports from Agency staff and consultants

9. Report (if necessary) by the Citizens’ Assessment District Advisory Committee (CADAC) 10. Report (if necessary) by member and partner agencies CORRESPONDENCE 11. Report on correspondence sent by and received by the Board PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public will be allowed to address the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency’s Board of Directors on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. Any member of the audience who may wish to bring a matter before the Board that has not been placed on the agenda may do so at this time; however, State law provides that no action may be taken on any item not appearing on the posted Agenda. ADJOURNMENT

Item 1

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency A Partnership for Flood Safety

August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of the minutes for the July 10, 2013 Board meeting

The proposed minutes for the Board of Director’s meeting on July 10, 2013 are attached for your review, modification and/or approval. Recommendation We recommend that the Board approve and authorize the Chair to sign the minutes. Thank you.

SBFCA Board Minutes Page 1 July 10, 2013

DRAFT MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY REGULAR MEETING OF

JULY 10, 2013 The Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (Agency) Board of Directors (Board), State of California, met on the above date in Regular Session at 1 p.m. in the City of Yuba City Council Chambers, Yuba City, California.

MEMBERS PRESENT County of Sutter: James Gallagher, Stan Cleveland County of Butte: Bill Connelly, Steve Lambert City of Yuba City: John Dukes City of Gridley: Jeff Draper City of Live Oak: Gary Baland City of Biggs: Bo Sheppard Levee District 1: Francis Silva Levee District 9: David Lamon MEMBERS ABSENT: Directors Chris Schmidl, Kash Gill, Al Montna STAFF PRESENT: Mike Inamine, Executive Director; Michael Bessette, Director of Engineering; Scott Shapiro, Agency Counsel; Budget Manager Seth Wurzel; and Kim Floyd, Public Outreach Manager.

REGULAR MEETING/CALL TO ORDER Board Chair James Gallagher opened the meeting at 1 p.m. and SBFCA Board Member Gary Baland led audience in the pledge of allegiance. CLOSED SESSION Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Govt. Code section 54956.8 Agency negotiator(s): McElhern/O'Regan Properties and negotiating parties:

PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATING PARTY

9850 Sheldon Road, Live Oak, CA 95953 Sukhraj S. Pamma

10234 Orchard Way, Live Oak, CA 95953 Paul Lea

6005 Highway 99, Live Oak, CA 95953 River Bottom Ranch, LLC

1111 Koch Lane, Live Oak, CA 95953 Amanjit S. Dhoot and Kuldeep K. Dhoot

924 Sanborn Rd., Yuba City, CA, 95993 Robert & Betty Storm Revocable Trust

902 Vance Ave., Biggs, CA 95917 Jeff & Darlene Fredericks

2007 Merrill Rd., Paradise, CA 95969 Deane & Edith Williams Testamentary Trust

3250 Larkin Road, Biggs, CA 95917-9728 James & Joann Diethrich

P.O. Box 1200, Gridley, CA 95948 Carrdi LLC

3022 Larkin Road, Biggs, CA 95917 James Banes Ranch

2770 Larkin Road, Biggs, CA 95917 Clinton W. Moffitt

2770 Larkin Road, Biggs, CA 95917 Blaine Moffitt

1118 Almond Avenue, Biggs, CA 95917 John Kucek


1240 Steadman Road, Biggs, CA 95917 Steven and Lori Kramer

20235 Homestead Road, Cupertino, CA 95014 Jack Mariani Sr. TR. et al.

1631 Willow Street, Suite 225, San Jose, CA 95125-5118 Cilker Revocable Trust et al.

1232 S. George Washington Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 Karmdeep & Hardeep Bains

1567 Booth Dr., Gridley, CA 95948 Butte County Housing Authority

685 Kentucky Street, Gridley, CA 95948 City of Gridley

P.O. Box 876, Gridley, CA 95948 Drainage District No. 1

P.O. Box 511196, Salt Lake City, UT 84151-1196 Farmland Reserve, Inc.

905 Alexander Ave, Gridley, CA 95948 Peekema Ranch LP

585 Cowee Avenue, Gridley, CA 95948 Waller Family Revocable Trust

735 Virginia Street, Gridley, CA 95948 Butte Water District

P.O. Box 876, Gridley, CA, 95948 Reclamation District No. 777

915 L Street # 1150, Sacramento CA, 95814 Leonard Berry

6741 Kent Ave, Live Oak, CA 95953 Hatamiya Revocable 08 Trust

1212 Pennington Rd., Live Oak, CA 95953 Manjinder & Beant Bains

1339 Bishop Ave., Live Oak, CA 95953 Wayne Sue

4525 Franklin Road, Yuba City, CA, 95993 Sutter Extension Water District

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36084, San Francisco, CA 94102

United States of America., Dept. of Army (General Services Administration)

1471 Coats Drive, Yuba City, CA 95991 Levee District No. 9

6005 Highway 99, Live Oak, CA 95993 Justin Micheli

P.O. Box 1383,Yuba City, CA 95992 or 1859 Alyssa Drive, Yuba City, CA 95993

Richland Enterprises

876 Oxford Ct., Yuba City, CA 95991-3479 Kewal & Resham K. Singh

P.O. Box 3730, Yuba City, CA 95992 Wilbur Rev & 1994 Trust et al.

29 Fourth Street, Marysville, CA 95901 Pacific Gas & Electric

1155 Pease Road, Yuba City, CA 95991-8814 Village Green Mobile Homes Park

1201 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95991 City of Yuba City

701 Bogue Road, Yuba City, CA 95991 Gilsizer County Drainage District

1110 Civic Center Blvd. # 2, Yuba City, CA 95993 Block Industrial Condo Assoc.

1160 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 County of Sutter


365 Second Street, Yuba City, CA 95991 Eric & Katherine Mackensen

243 Second Street, Yuba City, CA 95991 Levee District No. 1

1325 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 US Army Corps of Engineers

833 Tudor Road, Yuba City, CA 95991 Oswald Mutual Water Company

5020 Garden Highway, Yuba City, CA 95991 Johal Family 02 Trust

5316 Garden Highway, Yuba City, CA 95991 Berg Family Trust et al.

319 Nile Court, Vacaville, CA 95668 Queens of Peace Oratory

1216 North Tejon Street, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 Eleanor Homes

280 Wilkie Avenue, Yuba City, CA 95991 Feather Water District

5320 Garden Highway, Yuba City, CA 95991 Sierra Gold Nurseries, Inc.

P.O. Box 9, Meridian, CA 95957 Volcano Vista Farms

280 Wilkie Avenue, Yuba City, A 95991 Tudor Mutual Water Company

8540 Garden Highway, Yuba City, CA 95991 Dan Stephens Rev. Trust

822 Lewis Road, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Mildred Wilson

182 Wilkie Avenue, Yuba City, CA 95991 Taylor Brothers Farms, Inc.

182 Wilkie Avenue, Yuba City, CA 95991 Taylor Rev. Trust 93’

P.O Box 272, Yuba City, CA 95991 Sundeep Dale

12755 Garden Highway, Yuba City, CA 95991 Garden Highway Mutual Water Company

614 S. George Washington Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 Kuster Family Rev. 06’ Trust

P.O. Box H, Yuba City, CA 95992 Odysseus Farms PTN

Agency Counsel Scott Shapiro reported that the Board gave direction to staff and counsel regarding the various real property matters listed in the agenda. Mr. Shapiro stated that Director Gallagher excused and recused himself from the discussion related to River Bottom Ranch, and Director Silva excused and recused himself from the discussion regarding Feather Water District.

CONSENT CALENDAR On motion of Director John Dukes, seconded by Director Bo Sheppard and carried by those present, the Board approved the Consent Calendar as follows:

1) Approval of the June 12, 2013 Board minutes PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION & ACTION ITEMS

2) Receive and file monthly financial report Executive Director Mike Inamine provided an overview of the Board agenda action items, including the approval of the investment of the Agency’s bond proceeds and the addition of an administrative manager position.


Budget Manager Seth Wurzel stated that the Agency has working capital of $2.3 million as of May 31, 2013, which does not include bond proceeds. The Agency’s revenue is unchanged from the previous month as the Agency has received all assessment proceeds. On June 21, 2013, the Agency drew $5.7 million from the bond proceeds, and $34 million remain with the trustee. Mr. Wurzel will report bond proceed draws to the Board each month. In June, the Agency paid off member agency loans – from Sutter County, City of Yuba City, and Levee District 1 – at the end of June, 2013. There could be a minor true-up in 2013 to account for interest. No action taken on this item.

3) Approval of resolutions authorizing the investment of bond proceeds by the treasurer and executive director with Union Banc Investment Services as well as the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Mr. Wurzel explained that the agenda item requests two actions: (1) invest funds in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and (2) invest in other permitted investments through Union Banc, the Agency’s bond proceeds trustee. The goal is to reduce net interest costs of bonds by taking a very conservative approach to investments. The Agency would like to invest the proceeds that are not scheduled for use for the next 12-24 months. The second option is to allow the Agency to invest in Union Banc’s investment services to provide the Agency more flexibility. For example, the LAIF only permits one draw per month, and does not allow funds to be reinvested. The Union Banc investment services allow for funds to be withdrawn and deposited. Mr. Wurzel stated that he worked with Dan Cox of KNN Public Finance, the Agency’s financial advisor, as well as the City of Yuba City finance staff to review investment options and make a recommendation. Director Jeff Draper asked if there were operating charges with LAIF. Mr. Wurzel responded that LAIF is limited to no more than 5 percent of annual earnings for administrative costs. The yield on LAIF in recent years has been between 0.3-5 percent. Director Draper asked for clarification on risk if the funds were being invested in the state of California. Mr. Wurzel clarified that the pooled money is with the State’s general fund cash, but the funds are not invested in the State, instead the funds are invested in very low-risk federally backed investments. Director Draper asked what the Agency is currently earning on its bond proceeds. Mr. Wurzel responded that it is less than one basis point, which is essentially not earning any interest. The types of investments the Agency will use are very secure investments through LAIF and Union Banc. Director John Dukes asked for clarification on the amount of interest the Agency would earn on the investments. Mr. Wurzel responded the current interest that LAIF earned in 2011-2012 was 0.38 percent. No public comment. A motion was made by Director Dave Lamon to approve the resolutions authorizing the investment of bond proceeds by the treasurer and executive director with Union Banc Investment Services as well as the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The motion was seconded by Director Bill Connelly and was carried by those present.

4) Approval of Administrative Manager Position

Executive Director Mike Inamine asked Agency Clerk Sarah Modeste to excuse herself during this agenda item. Mr. Inamine stated that the agency administrative manager role has been largely filled by Sarah Modeste of Kennedy Modeste Communications through a consultant contract. The contract has been amended each year. Mr. Inamine stated that before the assessment district was formed in 2010, administrative duties were performed by clerical employees borrowed from member agencies. In 2010, when the assessment district was formed and the Agency’s needs increased, the former administrative support was not sufficient. As a stop-gap measure, Sarah Modeste, a public outreach consultant, was contracted to support


administrative functions. Since that time, and because that situation worked very well and continues to work very well, that contract has been amended three times. With the onset of construction and 2014 construction, the administrative activities – including administrative tasks, public outreach, contract administration, accounts receivable, and associated work – will also increase exponentially. Anticipating that, the Agency has budgeted an appropriate amount of money to fulfill this role with a consultant, just as Sarah Modeste is doing now, and with additional temporary staff. The Agency began discussing amendments to the Kennedy Modeste contract, and following discussion with Agency legal counsel, Downey Brand, it was determined that the future scope of work looks like an employee of the Agency, as opposed to a contractor. It could be a risk to the Agency if the contact was amended and the work should be completed by an employee. As the workload increases, the work must increasingly be completed by an employee working under the direction of the Executive Director. Mr. Inamine stated that he recognizes that there is great sensitivity to hiring additional permanent employees and that when the assessment district was formed, there was a commitment to not hire a large number of employees. To address this concern, the employment contract is limited to three years, which supports the Agency through the most intense period of construction activities. The compensation package will need to be approved by the ad hoc Board, as was done for the Executive Director and Director of Engineering. Mr. Inamine stated that the Agency has no intention to set up a long-term commitment with PERS or the like. The Agency is not a PERs agency, and has no plans to join PERS. The position will be advertised and interview conducted with the top candidates, a compensation package will be negotiated with the most qualified candidate, and then presented to the ad hoc Board for approval. Director Bill Connelly stated that the Agency must be very careful if the contractor exceeds full time, even if they have other clients. Director Connelly stated that the contract should be reviewed at the end of three years should the Agency decide additional services are necessary. He agreed that the Agency should not engage in PERS to avoid long term commitments. Mr. Inamine stated that the contract would terminate after three years. The employee would be an exempt employee and expected to do whatever it takes to complete the required work. The Agency conducted a salary survey to determine the range of $75,000-$95,000. This is commensurate with an administrative officer position. The Agency recognizes that there are furloughs and layoffs at member agencies and that this position, while necessary, is sensitive. Pat Miller stated that Mr. Inamine’s explanation cleared up a number of her concerns. She added that she had heard that the position will likely go to Sarah Modeste which raises the question to why the Agency is advertising the position as it seems like it will be a waste of money. Mrs. Miller stated that the issue should have been before the Citizens Assessment District Advisory Committee, and it was not. She stated that the Sutter County Taxpayers Association asked for an advisory committee before they could support the assessment district. The CADAC was approved and established, but it appears to be ineffective as a committee. There is a strong feeling that the committee is being manipulated to reduce comments and concerns brought before the Board. It has not met since January 2013. Mrs. Miller stated that the process was not totally open and transparent for the administrative manager position. Director James Gallagher suggested that the final package for the administrative manager compensation package be presented to the CADAC. Agency Counsel stated that should the Board direct staff to present the compensation package to the CADAC, it can do that. However, the CADAC charter does not include these types of things, and deals primarily with the assessment district. Director Gallagher asked if the executive director position was brought before the CADAC. Public Outreach Manager, Kim Floyd, responded and stated that the CADAC charter does not cover oversight of hiring Agency staff and the review of compensation packages. The Executive Director and Director of Engineering compensation packages were not brought before the CADAC for approval. These compensation packages were discussed at the CADAC meeting following the Board’s decision. Director Dukes asked why the CADAC has not met since January 2013. Ms. Floyd responded and stated that the CADAC is a self-directed committee and is not directed by Agency staff or consultants. The


CADAC has a self-elected chair and vice chair and those individuals are responsible for calling meetings. The Agency does provide topic ideas and information, when requested. Ms. Floyd stated that when the CADAC was formed, the Agency took the lead in organizing meetings, but was told that the Agency was too directive so Agency staff stepped back to let the members take the lead. Agency staff check in and assist as needed. Ms. Miller stated that she would attend the next CADAC meeting and advise the CADAC members that she would like them to meet monthly and in advance of the Board of Director’s meeting. Director Draper asked if the CADAC members could be notified of the next SBFCA Board meeting so they can be in the audience during the approval of the administrative manager compensation package. Mr. Inamine stated that the hiring of the administrative manager is as follows: post the job announcement, recruit applicants, review applications, conduct interview, select a top candidate, negotiate a compensation package, and then bring the compensation package before the ad hoc Board. Director Draper asked if the CADAC members could attend the ad hoc Board meeting. Mr. Shapiro stated that the ad hoc meeting is not a Brown Act noticed meeting and traditionally in public agencies, once the creation of a position is approved and if the compensation package is within the approved budget, there is no further Board action. Director Dukes stated that he is concerned as the Board would be setting precedence in how it hires employees, and the fact that it is being brought before the public at this time is transparent. Mr. Inamine stated that the process to hire an administrative manager is not a vehicle to hire Sarah Modeste. The Agency is looking to recruit the most qualified person for the position. Director Stan Cleveland stated that he agrees with Director Dukes, but still believes that the CADAC should meet monthly prior to the SBFCA Board meeting and believes this needs to be corrected. Director Dukes stated that the Board cannot direct the CADAC, but members could be encouraged to meet more regularly. Director Gary Baland asked if the Administrative Manager would also manage temporary employees, as needed. Mr. Inamine confirmed that this would be the case. Director Connelly asked if the Agency was required to recruit for a position. Mr. Inamine stated that the Agency is sensitive that there may be other candidates that could fill the position, and perhaps at a lesser cost, so it is important to recruit for potential candidates. Mr. Shapiro stated that when a specific item is not addressed in the Agency’s charter, it defers to Sutter County requirements. If Sutter County has a requirement to post, then SBFCA would, too. Director Dave Lamon stated that if the Agency did not go out for an open recruitment, the Agency could be seen as conducting a sweetheart deal, and there may be criticism either way, but it is best to ensure that the Agency is hiring the best candidate A motion was made by Director John Dukes to approve the administrative manager position. The motion was seconded by Director Bo Sheppard and was carried by those present.

INFORMATIONAL AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL ITEMS 5) Program/Project Update

Director of Engineering Michael Bessette provided an overview of recent engineering activities; a full report is included in the July 10, 2013 Board agenda packet. A brief summary is as follows: Engineering Design The design team is now focusing its efforts on advancing the 65% plans and specifications for Project Areas B and D to a 90% design level. Activities for this effort will include levee repair design refinement, additional field investigations in the tailings area, borrow area assessments of potential sites and addressing the IPE and Agency comments received on the 65% design for Areas B and D last year. The 90% design for those areas is due in August 2013. Construction Management Construction Management (Project Area C)


On May 15 the Contract w/ Nordic/Magnus Pacific Joint Venture for Bid Schedule A work (submittals) was executed and the Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued. Since that date the contractor has been very busy preparing and submitting the required contract submittals for approval. On June 15 the Contract for Bid Schedule B-D was executed and a NTP for non-ground disturbing activities was issued on June 20. A third NTP was issued on June 25 for installation of storm water pollution prevention best management facilities, construction fencing, and exploratory borings for the deep mix method wall installation in Reach 13. Additional current work activities include pre-construction documentation photographs in Reach 13, and initiation of control surveys and cross sectional surveying in Reach 13.

The Construction Management (CM) team continues to manage the tenant improvements for the construction management field office located at 1445 Garden Highway in Yuba City as well as the certification process for the CM Field Materials Laboratory at this same location. Environmental Documentation and Permitting The Final EIS was posted to the Federal Register on June 14 to begin the official 30-day ‘cooling off’ period for the federal environmental review process. This marks the achievement of another major milestone on the road to starting Project Area C construction. Once the cooling off period is complete, the USACE will be in a position to prepare a Record of Decision (ROD) and issue our Section 408 Permit. The Section 408 permit package has been forwarded by USACE Sacramento District to Division and HQ for concurrent review during the FEIS cooling off period. Staff is continuing to work with our Congressional representatives in Washington DC to expedite the USACE ROD and 408 review and approval process by HQ so the 408 can be issued in mid-July. Right of Way The right of way acquisition process is continuing in Project Areas C, D and B. Purchase offers have been made to nearly all property owners in Project Area C. To date, the Agency has accepted offers from 11 property owners and negotiations are ongoing with the remainder. State Funding and Coordination The process of acquiring the needed State funding for construction is advancing. DWR issued a Funding Commitment Letter on May 31, 2013 for approximately $57 million for Project Area C. A Construction Funding Agreement has been finalized and is being routed to the State Department of General Services for final processing and approval. Final approval of a Construction Funding Agreement may take several months, however, at this time staff does not foresee a delay in a construction funding agreement that would impact major construction beginning in July. SBFCA staff is continuing to work with DWR project managers to process reimbursements and advances under our design funding agreement. Corps Feasibility Study Pilot Project The draft Feasibility Study Report was released for public review via notice in the Federal Register on June 14 (the same day that the 408 project FEIS was noticed in the Federal Register). USACE coordinated with SBFCA and DWR to schedule a public meeting during the 45-day comment period, which will be held on July 22 between 6-8 p.m. at the Veteran’s Memorial Hall in Yuba City. Regional Planning A first draft of the framework and outline for the plan has been produced and is under internal review. A kick-off meeting to introduce a high-level version of the draft plan was held on June 5 at the Yuba County Government Center. The meeting was well attended and proved to be a successful start to the Regional Planning effort. Staff is participating in regional Coordinating Committee activities, which are designed to improve communication and coordination between the CVFPB, DWR, and each of the six planning regions. The consultant team is scheduling and conducting small group meetings with stakeholder groups, including maintaining agencies, cities and counties, and NGOs to gather data and information necessary for plan development. The program can be accessed at www.frrfmp.com, and a project hotline has been established (530-845-5988).

Federal Issues Update Mr. Inamine stated that the push for the Agency’s 408 permit is still outstanding. Many local representatives, including Congressmen LaMalfa and Garamendi as well as Congresswomen Boxer and Feinstein.

http://www.frrfmp.com/


Director Stan Cleveland stated that he had concern over where the public information meeting was being held. He requested that it be held closer to the project site so interested property owners could attend in their own neighborhood. Public Outreach Manager Kim Floyd stated that she agrees that engaging as many property owners as possible is very important, and meeting in neighborhood settings is especially useful. However, in the case of this public meeting, the notice was mailed to more than 18,000 homes and businesses. We needed to ensure that we had a location large enough to accommodate the attendance. The meeting will be held on July 24 at 6 p.m. at the Sutter County Veteran’s Hall. Director Gallagher suggested also holding a meeting in Shanghai Bend Park since the 2013 work will be held in that area. Mr. Inamine suggested that there will be a good turnout for the public meeting. If it pleases the Board, staff can hold an additional meeting at Shanghai Bend Park. Director Cleveland suggested that large group meetings are held, then smaller meetings are also held with directly impacted property owners. Mr. Inamine responded that the Agency has and will continue to reach out to property owners that are directly impacted. Haul route maps and work reaches are reviewed with property owners who are directly impacted. Director Gary Baland stated that he understands that some material will be transported by rail. He stated that Sunset Molding has a spare rail and may accommodate a rail, and the company may benefit from the shared space. Director Bo Sheppard asked for clarification between the meeting on July 22 and the July 24 meeting. Mr. Bessette stated that the meeting held on July 22 is a USACE-led meeting regarding the Feasibility Study and the meeting on July 24 is the Agency’s meeting regarding construction activities.

6) Other reports from Agency staff and consultants Nothing to report at this time.

7) Report (if necessary) by the Citizens’ Assessment District Advisory Committee (CADAC) The next CADAC meeting will be held on August 15 at noon. The meeting is open to the public and will be held at the SBFCA office – 1227 Bridge Street, Suite C, Yuba City, CA.

8) Report (if necessary) by member and partner agencies.

Nothing to report at this time.

CORRESPONDENCE 9) Report on correspondence sent by and received by the Board.

Nothing to report at this time.

PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment. m ADJOURNMENT With no further business coming before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m.

__________________________________

ATTEST BY:__________________________________ JAMES GALLAGHER, CHAIR

SARAH MODESTE

Item 2


August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director Bob Cermak, Assessment Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution for the levy and collection of assessments for the Sutter

Butte Flood Control Agency Assessment District in the 2013-14 Fiscal Year in Sutter County and Butte County

Recommendation Approve resolution for levy and collection of Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency’s assessments in the 2013-14 Fiscal Year in Sutter and Butte counties. The assessments will be levied at the rate specified in the Final Engineer’s Report. Background On July 14, 2010, after completion of a voter approved Proposition 218 election, the SBFCA Board approved Resolution 10-004 adopting the Final Engineer’s Report and forming the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Assessment District. The new district would collect approximately $6.65 million per year for an estimated 33 years, which would fund the local share of the proposed activities. By resolution, the Board has authorized the levy and collection of the assessment for the past three fiscal years. Discussion The attached resolution authorizes the Assessment Roll of all parcels subject to the SBFCA Assessment District assessments to be filed with the Sutter County Auditor-Controller and Butte County Auditor-Controller for Fiscal Year 2013-14. Fiscal Impact Approval of the attached resolution authorizes the levy of assessments which generate approximately $6.65 million in revenue. The approved 5-year budget reflects $6.5 million of assessment revenue in FY 2013-14 within SBFCA’s operational and capital funds. Approval of the recommendation is consistent with the approved budget. Approval of the resolution is also consistent with covenants made within the outstanding Loan and Bond Indenture agreements related to the Agency’s debt obligations. Thank you.

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Assessment District Page 1 of 3

1270591.1

SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY RESOLUTION 2013-11

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

THE SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE SUTTER-BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014

WHEREAS, the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (“Agency”) is a Joint Powers Authority created in 2007 to finance and construct levee improvements in the Sutter Basin; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Agency, after a public hearing and voter election in

compliance with Proposition 218, adopted Resolution 10-004 approving the Final Engineer’s Report (“Engineer’s Report”) for the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Assessment District (“Assessment District”), formed the Assessment District and ordered the levy of assessments in Fiscal Year 2010-11 at the rates specified in the Engineer’s Report.

WHEREAS, on April 19, 2012, the Agency entered into a $25,000,000 Loan Agreement with

Rabobank, NA and within that Loan Agreement made a covenant to levy and collect the assessments in order to make debt service payments on the Loan.

WHEREAS, on June 1, 2013, the Agency entered into an Indenture of Trust with Union Bank, NA

related to the issuance of its Series 2013 Assessment Revenue Bonds and within that Indenture of Trust made a covenant to levy and collect the assessments in order to make debt service payments on the Bonds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The above recitals are true and correct. 2. The assessments for fiscal year 2013-14 shall be levied at the rate as specified in the Engineer’s Report, using the method for apportioning such assessments as provided in the Engineer’s Report. The assessments are levied without regard to property valuation. 3. The Agency staff is directed to file or cause to be filed and to take or cause to be taken all actions necessary to allow collection of the assessment, including the filing of a certified copy of this Resolution with the Auditor/Controller of Sutter and Butte Counties (the “County Auditor/Controller”). Upon such filing, the County Auditor/Controller shall enter on the County tax roll opposite each lot or parcel of land in the Assessment District the amount of assessment thereupon as shown in the Engineer’s Report and described in this Resolution. The benefit assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County ad valorem taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County ad valorem taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. After collection by the Counties Tax Collectors, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due the Counties for collection, shall be paid to the Agency for the purposes of the Assessment District.

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Assessment District Page 2 of 3

1270591.1

4. For parcels within the Assessment District that are owned by public agencies, utilities or for other reasons are not included in the Direct Levy Secured Roll by the County Auditor/Controller, the Agency staff is directed to direct bill such assessments. 5. The monies representing assessments collected shall be deposited in a separate fund or funds designated for the Assessment District. Amounts deposited to such fund(s) shall be expended only for the services and other activities that specially benefit the lands within the Assessment District as described in the Engineer’s Report. 6. The assessment, as it applies to any parcel, may be corrected, cancelled or a refund granted as appropriate, by order of the Board or by order of the Executive Director of The Agency. Any such corrections, cancellations or refunds shall be limited to current or future fiscal years and shall not be granted retroactively.

ADOPTED as a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency at a regular meeting

duly held on the 14th day of August, 2013. ____________________________________ James Gallagher, CHAIRMAN

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: ______________________________ ____________________________________ Scott Shapiro BOARD SECRETARY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SUTTER ) SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY )

I, Sarah Modeste, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency, do hereby certify

that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2013-11 adopted by the Board of Directors of the

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency, California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of August, 2013 by

the following vote:

AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ____________________________________ SECRETARY

Item 3


August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director

SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment to ICF Task Order 9 for Environmental Compliance

Support, to be performed as an In-Kind Contribution (IKC) for the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study.

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve Amendment 1 to Task Order 9 of the capital contract with ICF International for Environmental Compliance Support in association with the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. BACKGROUND SBFCA’s remaining financial obligation under the USACE Sutter Basin Feasibility Study will be fulfilled by a combination of cash contributions and in-kind contributions (IKC). The latter category consists of work we and/or our contractors perform, which is then credited against our financial obligation. USACE requested that SBFCA provide a number of Environmental Compliance tasks. This work includes EIS/R sections on transportation, air quality, climate change and greenhouse gases, noise, vegetation and wetlands, land use and social impacts; Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland delineation, and ESA biological assessments. At the June 12, 2012 Board meeting, the Board approved Task Order 9 with ICF in the amount of $335,055 to perform this IKC credit work. This amendment in the amount of $299,984, addresses work necessary to complete Section 106 compliance required by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). This work includes the following:

A subsurface archaeological survey that is designed to meet the requirements of Section 106 for identification of archaeological resources.

An archaeological inventory records search of identified archaeological sites

Consulting with the Native American Heritage Commission and local Native American representatives.

Coordinating with the USACE and SHPO regarding the effects analysis. We intend to seek reimbursement for the full amount through the Proposition 13 grant. Fiscal Impact The approval of ICF Task Order 9, Amendment 1 would obligate the Agency to pay for the associated services delivered up to the task order budget limitation. This effort exceeds the current budgeted expenditures included within 5-Year Capital Budget for the existing Task Order. SBFCA’s budgeted expenditures, however, are expected to be substantially reduced in the future. Federal appropriations included within the USACE F13 work plan, allow the USACE to accept additional Work-In-Kind (WIK) expenses incurred by SBFCA. It is expected that this will

Item 3

reduce the remaining cash payments to USACE in FY13/14. These reduced cash payments are expected to offset the proposed additional expenses associated with the proposed ICF Task Order 9, Amendment 1. SBFCA staff is currently working with USACE to authorize additional WIK expenses to reduce the budgeted remaining cash payments. Ultimately, the proposed ICF Task Order 9, Amendment 1 would be fully funded by the remaining authorizations included within the existing Prop 13 Grant with DWR for services associated with the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. As a result, it is expected that there would be no net budgetary impact to the approved 5-Year Capital budget as a result of the Board’s approval of the recommended action.

Item 4


August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director

SUBJECT: Authorize the Executive Director to Submit Grant Applications to the

Department of Water Resources under the Yuba Feather Flood Protection Program

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve resolutions and authorize the Executive Director to execute and submit grant applications and necessary related documents to the California Department of Water Resources under the Yuba Feather Flood Protection Program for the following three proposed projects: Feather River West Bank Erosion, Gridley Bridge Site; Feather River West Levee Seepage Remediation at Laurel Avenue; and Oroville Wildlife Area Flood Stage Reduction Project. BACKGROUND The Yuba Feather Flood Protection Program (YFFPP) was authorized by Proposition 13, The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Act (also known as the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000). The YFFPP was established to address the continuing and serious threat to life and property along the Yuba/Feather River system and the Colusa Basin Drain. The Costa-Machado Water Act authorized $1.97 billion to be spent on water quality funding, water conservation, flood protection, etc. $90 million was allocated to the YFFPP. Of that amount, the Department of Fish and Game was appointed to administer $20 million to mitigate environmental and wildlife impacts as a result of implemented flood risk projects. The remaining $70 million was authorized to be used by DWR or the Central Valley Flood Protection Board to fund local flood risk reduction projects through the YFFPP. From the $70 million authorized in Proposition 13, a remaining total of $2.4 million is being offered to local public entities through an open Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP). Funding will be awarded based on ability to meet eligibility criteria and produce deliverables in a timely manner. The grant funds can be used for feasibility studies, design, or implementation tasks. DWR may reimburse up to 100 percent of eligible feasibility study or design costs, and up to 70 percent of eligible implementation costs. SBFCA is proposing to submit the following three grant applications:

Oroville Wildlife Area Flood Stage Reduction Project: This project would reduce flood stage within the Feather River within the Oroville Wildlife Area by eliminating flow obstructions and would also include enhancing riparian habitat.

Feather River Bank Erosion, Gridley Bridge Site: This project would address an active 300 foot long erosion site located upstream of E. Gridley Road Bridge.

Item 4

Feather River West Levee Seepage Remediation at Laurel Avenue: This project is located just north of Laurel Avenue along the Feather River West Levee and would remediate a known levee seepage site through the construction of a 100’ wide undrained seepage berm and a soil-bentonite cutoff wall constructed through the centerline of the existing levee to a depth of 25.5 to 27.5 feet.

Resolutions to be provided to the Board and public at the Board meeting. Fiscal Impact Preparation of the grant submittal package is included in the approved 5-year budget; submittal of the grant applications has no fiscal impact.

Item 5


August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director Seth Wurzel, Budget Manager SUBJECT: Receive and File Monthly Financial Report (June 2013)

Recommendation We recommend the Board receive and file the June 2013 Financial Report and receive staff’s monthly financial report update. Background Staff will provide a brief presentation of the current financial position of the Agency and financial activities at the Board meeting and will be prepared to answer any questions.

The monthly financial report includes the following information:

Current Working Capital Position: Provides an update as to the liquidity of the Agency and ability to cover current obligations. This information is presented within the attached monthly financial reports prepared in coordination with Yuba City finance staff. The financial report reflects the financial information as of June 2013. The information presented is compared to the approved Final 5-Year Budget

Cash Flow Projection Update: Provides an estimate of the cash needs of both the Agency and the project over time. This estimate forms the basis for Agency financial planning. The cash flow representing the unaudited actual expenses for FY 12/13 and a projection for FY 13/14 will be provided at the Board meeting.

Fiscal Impact This is an informational item only with no fiscal impact to the Agency.

Final Amended Month Ending Rec'd/InvoicedLine Item Description 2012-13 Budget [1,2] June 2013 to Date [4]

Working Capital Beginning of PeriodOperational Fund 730 1,953,644 1,953,644 1,953,644 Capital Fund 731 ‐ USACE Study 1,005,314 1,005,314 1,005,314 Capital Fund 731 ‐ EIP 747,964 747,964 747,964 Capital Fund 731 ‐ Stakeholder 34,048 34,048 34,048

Total Beginning of Period 3,740,970 3,740,970 3,740,970

TransfersOperational Fund 730 (1,500,000) ‐ ‐

Capital Fund 731Capital Fund 731 ‐ USACE Study 181,272 Capital Fund 731 ‐ EIP 1,065,167 ‐ ‐ Capital Fund 731 ‐ Stakeholder ‐ ‐ ‐ Capital Fund 731 ‐ RFMP 253,561 ‐ ‐

Subtotal Capital Fund 1,500,000 ‐ ‐ Net Transfers 0 ‐ ‐

RevenuesOperational Fund 730 750,000 750,034 750,034

Capital Fund 731Capital Fund 731 ‐ USACE Study 144,603 22,303 22,303

Capital Fund 731 ‐ EIP (Local) 5,750,033 5,606,621 5,606,621

Capital Fund 731 ‐ EIP (State) ‐ ‐ ‐

Capital Fund 731 ‐ Stakeholder 10,000 (14,836) (14,836)

Capital Fund 731 ‐ RFMP ‐ ‐ ‐

Subtotal Capital Fund 5,904,635 5,614,088 5,614,088 Total Revenues Operating & Capital 6,654,635 6,364,122 6,364,122

ExpensesOperational Fund 730 310,675 359,006 406,158

Capital Fund 731Capital Fund 731 ‐ USACE Study 1,317,761 1,172,979 1,206,616

Capital Fund 731 ‐ EIP 10,642,041 8,678,373 11,045,151

Capital Fund 731 ‐ Stakeholder 44,049 28,560 28,560

Capital Fund 731 ‐ RFMP 253,561 166,708 190,583

Subtotal Capital Fund 12,257,412 10,046,620 12,470,910 Total Expenses Operating & Capital 12,568,087 10,405,627 12,877,068

Financing Activities [2]Proceeds from of New Debt [Trustee] 34,266,624 34,266,624 Proceeds from of New Debt [SBFCA] 7,913,939 7,913,939 Short/Long Term Debt Repayment (3,114,782) (3,114,782) (3,114,782) Interest Paid on Outstanding Debt (72,152) (72,152) (72,152)

Net Financing Activities 38,993,628 38,993,628 38,993,628

Working Capital End of PeriodOperational Fund 730 892,969 2,344,671 2,297,520 Capital Fund 731 ‐ USACE Study 13,428 (145,362) (178,999) Capital Fund 731 ‐ EIP [3] 35,914,752 36,669,841 34,303,063 Capital Fund 731 ‐ Stakeholder (1) (9,348) (9,348) Capital Fund 731 ‐ RFMP 0 (166,708) (190,583)

Total End of Period 36,821,147 38,693,094 36,221,653

Working Capital Net of Trustee Funds 4,426,470 1,955,029

[1] Reflects Proposed Amended Budget to be presented to the Board at it's May 8, 2013 meeting.

[2] FY 12/13 Capital Budget expenditures reflects carryover of remaining FY 11/12 Budget pursuant to section 9.2 of the approved budget resolution.

[3] Financing Activities are reflected in the Capital Fund EIP Ending Working Capital Balance

[4] Includes accrued expenses in FY 13/14 for ease of presentation. Note: These will be shifted to FY 13/14 upon the closing of the 1st period of FY 13/14.

SBFCA BUDGETTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL RECONCILIATION

42,180,563

FY 2012/13

SBFCA Budget Forecast and Cash Flow 07.22.2013 SMW 8/1/2013 Cons Wrkg

Exhibit A

SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCYCOMBINED SUMMARY STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIESAS OF MONTH ENDING JUNE 2013 OF FY 13/147/31/2013

OPERATIONS (730) OPERATIONS (730) OPERATIONS (730)

ADMINUSACESTUDY EIP

STAKE‐HOLDER

REGIONALPLANNING

Sub‐Total ‐ Capital Fund TOTALS ADMIN

USACESTUDY EIP

STAKE‐HOLDER

REGIONALPLANNING

Sub‐Total ‐ Capital Fund TOTALS ADMIN

USACESTUDY EIP

STAKE‐HOLDER

REGIONALPLANNING

Sub‐Total ‐ Capital Fund TOTALS

% OF BUDGETEXPENDED

REVENUES:43195-Federal Intergov't Funds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%43495-Proposition 13 Funds - $1.4 M ‐ 22,303 ‐ ‐ ‐ 22,303 22,303 ‐ 144,603 ‐ ‐ ‐ 144,603 144,603 ‐ 122,300 ‐ ‐ ‐ 122,300 122,300 15%43495-Proposition 13 Funds - $650 K ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%43530-EIP Grant Funds - (Local Credit) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%43531-EIP Grant Funds - (State Share) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%43717‐Local Intergov't Contributions ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%45520-Assessment District Revenues 750,000 ‐ 5,606,589 ‐ ‐ 5,606,589 6,356,589 750,000 ‐ 5,750,000 ‐ ‐ 5,750,000 6,500,000 ‐ ‐ 143,411 ‐ ‐ 143,411 143,411 98%

Sub-Total 750,000 22,303 5,606,589 ‐ ‐ 5,628,891 6,378,891 750,000 144,603 5,750,000 ‐ ‐ 5,894,603 6,644,603 ‐ 122,300 143,411 ‐ ‐ 265,711 ‐ 96%46110‐Interest on Investments 34 ‐ 33 ‐ ‐ 33 66 ‐ ‐ 33 ‐ ‐ 33 33 (34) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (34) 203%49010‐Other Revenue ‐ ‐ ‐ (14,836) ‐ (14,836) (14,836) ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,000 ‐ 10,000 10,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 24,836 ‐ 24,836 24,836 ‐148%

Sub-Total 34 ‐ 33 (14,836) ‐ (14,803) (14,770) ‐ ‐ 33 10,000 ‐ 10,033 10,033 (34) ‐ ‐ 24,836 ‐ 24,836 24,802 ‐147%

TOTAL INCOME 750,034 22,303 5,606,621 (14,836) ‐ 5,614,088 6,364,122 750,000 144,603 5,750,033 10,000 ‐ 5,904,635 6,654,635 (34) 122,300 143,411 24,836 ‐ 290,547 ‐ 96%

EXPENDITURES ‐ ADMINISTRATION:Operations:62701-Executive Director ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%62730-Attorney (9,260) ‐ (9,260) (11,000) ‐ (11,000) (1,740) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,740) 84%62701-Analyst/Administrative Assistant (4,102) ‐ (4,102) (5,500) ‐ (5,500) (1,398) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,398) 75%62701-Clerk/Secretary ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%6279(8,9)-Executive Director (127,506) ‐ (127,506) (64,269) ‐ (64,269) 63,237 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 63,237 198%61(5,2)(XX)-Director of Engineering (43,687) (43,687) (37,737) (37,737) 5,950 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,950 116%62701-Director of Engineering Support ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%62701-Public Outreach (3,463) ‐ (3,463) (4,706) ‐ (4,706) (1,243) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,243) 74%62701-Financial Mgt (55,047) ‐ (55,047) (45,982) ‐ (45,982) 9,065 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,065 120%62701-Assessment District Admin. (87,557) ‐ (87,557) (105,333) ‐ (105,333) (17,776) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (17,776) 83%

Sub‐Total (330,622) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (330,622) (274,527) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (274,527) 56,095 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120%0%Services and Supplies (28,384) (124,652) (124,652) (153,037) (26,148) (677,256) (677,256) (703,404) 2,236 ‐ (552,604) ‐ ‐ (552,604) (550,368) 22%Equipment ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0%

Sub‐Total (28,384) ‐ (124,652) ‐ ‐ (124,652) (153,037) (26,148) ‐ (677,256) ‐ ‐ (677,256) (703,404) 2,236 ‐ (552,604) ‐ ‐ (552,604) ‐ 22%Total Operations (359,006) ‐ (124,652) ‐ ‐ (124,652) (483,659) (300,675) ‐ (677,256) ‐ ‐ (677,256) (977,931) 58,331 ‐ (552,604) ‐ ‐ (552,604) ‐ 49%

EXPENDITURES ‐ PROGRAM:USACE Feasibility Study:Administration (89,125) (89,125) (89,125) (100,439) (100,439) (100,439) ‐ (11,313) ‐ ‐ ‐ (11,313) (11,313) 89%Engineering (166,215) (166,215) (166,215) (223,159) (223,159) (223,159) ‐ (56,944) ‐ ‐ ‐ (56,944) (56,944) 74%Environmental (306,139) (306,139) (306,139) (382,413) (382,413) (382,413) ‐ (76,274) ‐ ‐ ‐ (76,274) (76,274) 80%Payments to USACE (611,500) (611,500) (611,500) (611,750) (611,750) (611,750) ‐ (250) ‐ ‐ ‐ (250) (250) 100%

Sub‐Total ‐ (1,172,979) ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,172,979) (1,172,979) ‐ (1,317,761) ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,317,761) (1,317,761) ‐ (144,782) ‐ ‐ ‐ (144,782) ‐ 89%EIP:Pre-Planning (12,886) (12,886) (12,886) (17,183) (17,183) (17,183) ‐ ‐ (4,297) ‐ ‐ (4,297) (4,297) 75%Administration (1,447,659) (1,447,659) (1,447,659) (1,576,287) (1,576,287) (1,576,287) ‐ ‐ (128,629) ‐ ‐ (128,629) (128,629) 92%Engineering (3,918,843) (3,918,843) (3,918,843) (3,697,586) (3,697,586) (3,697,586) ‐ ‐ 221,257 ‐ ‐ 221,257 221,257 106%Environmental (1,289,104) (1,289,104) (1,289,104) (1,085,719) (1,085,719) (1,085,719) ‐ ‐ 203,385 ‐ ‐ 203,385 203,385 119%Right of Way Services (1,885,229) (1,885,229) (1,885,229) (3,588,009) (3,588,009) (3,588,009) ‐ ‐ (1,702,780) ‐ ‐ (1,702,780) (1,702,780) 53%

Sub‐Total ‐ ‐ (8,553,721) ‐ ‐ (8,553,721) (8,553,721) ‐ ‐ (9,964,784) ‐ ‐ (9,964,784) (9,964,784) ‐ ‐ (1,411,064) ‐ ‐ (1,411,064) ‐ 86%

Stakeholder Management6563(7,8,9) Stakeholder Management (28,560) (28,560) (28,560) (44,049) (44,049) (44,049) ‐ ‐ ‐ (15,489) ‐ (15,489) (15,489) 65%

Sub‐Total ‐ ‐ ‐ (28,560) ‐ (28,560) (28,560) ‐ ‐ ‐ (44,049) ‐ (44,049) (44,049) ‐ ‐ ‐ (15,489) ‐ (15,489) ‐ 65%

Regional Planning6564X Regional Planning Efforts (166,708) (166,708) (166,708) ‐ (253,561) (253,561) (253,561) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (86,853) (86,853) (86,853) 66%

Sub‐Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (166,708) (166,708) (166,708) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (253,561) (253,561) (253,561) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (86,853) (86,853) ‐ 66%

Total Capital ‐ (1,172,979) (8,553,721) (28,560) (166,708) (9,921,968) (9,921,968) ‐ (1,317,761) (9,964,784) (44,049) (253,561) (11,580,155) (11,580,155) ‐ (144,782) (1,411,064) (15,489) (86,853) (1,658,187) ‐ 86%Budgeted Contingency (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (10,000) 0%

TOTAL EXPENDITURES (359,006) (1,172,979) (8,678,373) (28,560) (166,708) (10,046,620) (10,405,627) (310,675) (1,317,761) (10,642,041) (44,049) (253,561) (12,257,412) (12,568,087) 48,331 (144,782) (1,963,668) (15,489) (86,853) (2,210,791) (10,000) 83%

NET REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 391,027 (1,150,676) (3,071,752) (43,396) (166,708) (4,432,532) (4,041,505) 439,325 (1,173,158) (4,892,008) (34,049) (253,561) (6,352,776) (5,913,451) 48,298 (22,482) (1,820,257) 9,347 (86,853) (1,920,244) ‐

NET TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUNDS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,500,000) 181,272 1,065,167 ‐ 253,561 1,500,000 0 (1,500,000) 181,272 1,065,167 ‐ 253,561 1,500,000 0

NET FINANCING ACTIVITIES ‐ ‐ 38,993,628 ‐ ‐ 38,993,628 38,993,628 ‐ ‐ 38,993,628 ‐ ‐ 38,993,628 38,993,628 ‐ ‐ 0 ‐ ‐ 0 0

WORKING CAPITAL ‐ JULY 1, 2012 1,953,644 1,005,314 747,964 34,048 ‐ 1,787,326 3,740,970 1,953,644 1,005,314 747,964 34,048 ‐ 1,787,326 3,740,970 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WORKING CAPITAL ‐ MONTH END JUNE 2013 2,344,671 (145,362) 36,669,841 (9,348) (166,708) 36,348,423 38,693,094 892,969 13,428 35,914,752 (1) 0 35,928,179 36,821,147 (1,451,702) 158,790 (755,089) 9,347 166,708 (420,244) 0

% of Year Complete100%

SBFCA FUNDS ‐ ACTIVITIES TO DATE SBFCA FUNDS ‐ FY 12/13 BUDGET SBFCA FUNDS ‐ VARIANCE FROM BUDGETCAPITAL FUND (731) CAPITAL FUND (731) CAPITAL FUND (731)

SBFCA Budget Forecast and Cash Flow 07.22.2013 SMW 8/1/2013 Stmt of Actvty 13-14

Exhibit B

SUNGARD PENTAMATION, INC. PAGE NUMBER: 1DATE: 07/24/2013 CITY OF YUBA CITY ACCTPA21TIME: 16:55:47 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND

SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr=’13’ and transact.period=’12’ and transact.fund between ’730’ and ’732’ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/14

FUND − 730 − FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY

CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT −−−−−−−−−−−VENDOR−−−−−−−−−−− FUND/DEPT ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

10100 188208 V 05/23/13 304147 SVLA 7350 62801 SBFCA/5−30−13 MEETI 0.00 −30.00

10100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 7350 62701 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 420.0310100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 7350 62701 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 242.0510100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 7350 62701 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 446.20TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,108.28

10100 188526 06/13/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 7350 62701 SBFCA/APR & MAY 201 0.00 493.90

10100 188563 06/13/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 7350 62701 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 6,786.43

10100 188566 06/13/13 201761 SPRINT 7350 62201 SBFCA/4−28 TO 5−27− 0.00 13.35

10100 188717 06/26/13 301598 CITY OF YUBA CITY 730 20410 SBFCA/LONG TERM LOA 0.00 1,543,476.21

10100 188718 06/26/13 55431 LEVEE DISTRICT 1 730 20410 SBFCA/LONG TERM LOA 0.00 27,829.43

10100 188719 06/26/13 201840 SUTTER COUNTY ADMIN 730 20410 SBFCA/LONG TERM LOA 0.00 1,543,476.21

10100 188751 06/27/13 305243 DYNAMIC IMAGING 7350 62401 SBFCA/FREIGHT 0.00 24.11

10100 188775 06/27/13 301307 JRP HISTORICAL CONS 7350 62701 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE SERV 0.00 500.59

10100 188783 06/27/13 304991 MICHAEL BESSETTE 7350 62801 SBFCA/APRIL REIMBUR 0.00 61.43

10100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 7350 62730 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 322.08

TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 3,124,062.02

TOTAL FUND 0.00 3,124,062.02



FUND − 731 − SBFCA CAPITAL FUND


10100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 996001 66302 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 4,238.8710100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 996001 66302 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 3,990.2410100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 995001 66302 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 4,238.8610100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 996001 66302 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 2,299.4510100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 995001 66302 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 2,299.4510100 188420 06/06/13 304082 KENNEDY MODESTE COM 995001 66302 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 3,990.23TOTAL CHECK 0.00 21,057.10

10100 188441 06/06/13 301312 PARSONS BRINCKERHOF 996001 66541 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 12,397.1410100 188441 06/06/13 301312 PARSONS BRINCKERHOF 995001 66541 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 12,397.14TOTAL CHECK 0.00 24,794.28

10100 188494 06/13/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 996001 66714 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 41,628.6210100 188494 06/13/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 995001 66714 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 41,628.6310100 188494 06/13/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 996001 66717 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 66.9510100 188494 06/13/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 995001 66716 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 22,295.0010100 188494 06/13/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 995001 66717 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 66.9510100 188494 06/13/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 996001 66716 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 22,294.99TOTAL CHECK 0.00 127,981.14

10100 188507 06/13/13 305219 CONDEMNATION DEPOSI 995001 67100 SBFCA/CONDEMNATION 0.00 22,850.00

10100 188508 06/13/13 305219 CONDEMNATION DEPOSI 995001 67100 SBFCA/CONDEMNATION 0.00 18,900.00

10100 188526 06/13/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 992001 65642 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 5,148.2010100 188526 06/13/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 995001 66514 SBFCA/APR & MAY 201 0.00 1,450.0010100 188526 06/13/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 996001 66514 SBFCA/APR & MAY 201 0.00 1,450.0010100 188526 06/13/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 996001 66331 SBFCA/APR & MAY 201 0.00 4,691.9810100 188526 06/13/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 995001 66331 SBFCA/APR & MAY 201 0.00 4,691.98TOTAL CHECK 0.00 17,432.16

10100 188563 06/13/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 995001 66311 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 377.5210100 188563 06/13/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 995001 66521 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 4,761.0110100 188563 06/13/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 996001 66311 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 377.5310100 188563 06/13/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 996001 66521 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 4,761.01TOTAL CHECK 0.00 10,277.07

10100 188566 06/13/13 201761 SPRINT 995001 66311 SBFCA/4−28 TO 5−27− 0.00 126.8010100 188566 06/13/13 201761 SPRINT 996001 66311 SBFCA/4−28 TO 5−27− 0.00 126.81TOTAL CHECK 0.00 253.61

10100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66733 SBFCA/FEB 2013 SERV 0.00 486.1210100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66733 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 2,384.5610100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66734 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 195,665.9110100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66734 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 195,665.9210100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66731 SBFCA/FEB 2013 SERV 0.00 2,747.0410100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66734 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 246,035.2010100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66733 SBFCA/FEB 2013 SERV 0.00 486.1310100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66603 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 110.1510100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66603 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 110.1510100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66607 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 215.6410100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66703 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 1,872.75





10100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66707 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 3,669.8410100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66607 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 215.6410100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66731 SBFCA/FEB 2013 SERV 0.00 2,747.0410100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66703 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 1,872.7510100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66707 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 3,669.8510100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66734 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 246,035.2110100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66733 SBFCA/JAN 2013 SERV 0.00 2,384.5610100 188659 06/20/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66803 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 940.53TOTAL CHECK 0.00 907,314.99

10100 188746 06/27/13 304861 DIEPENBROCK ELKIN L 996001 66561 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 295.0010100 188746 06/27/13 304861 DIEPENBROCK ELKIN L 995001 66561 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 295.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 590.00

10100 188751 06/27/13 305243 DYNAMIC IMAGING 996001 66311 SBFCA/FREIGHT 0.00 229.0510100 188751 06/27/13 305243 DYNAMIC IMAGING 995001 66311 SBFCA/FREIGHT 0.00 229.04TOTAL CHECK 0.00 458.09

10100 188769 06/27/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 996001 66734 SBFCA/FEB 2013 SERV 0.00 243,019.6510100 188769 06/27/13 200071 HDR ENGINEERING INC 995001 66734 SBFCA/FEB 2013 SERV 0.00 243,019.66TOTAL CHECK 0.00 486,039.31

10100 188775 06/27/13 301307 JRP HISTORICAL CONS 996001 66311 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE SERV 0.00 4,755.6310100 188775 06/27/13 301307 JRP HISTORICAL CONS 995001 66311 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE SERV 0.00 4,755.63TOTAL CHECK 0.00 9,511.26

10100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 996001 66504 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 1,370.1210100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 995001 66504 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 27.5010100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 992001 65642 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 3,408.0310100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 995001 66504 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 1,370.1310100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 992001 65641 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 10,542.9910100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 992001 65643 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 10,137.5010100 188782 06/27/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 996001 66504 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 27.50TOTAL CHECK 0.00 26,883.77

10100 188783 06/27/13 304991 MICHAEL BESSETTE 996001 66311 SBFCA/APRIL REIMBUR 0.00 113.8310100 188783 06/27/13 304991 MICHAEL BESSETTE 995001 66311 SBFCA/APRIL REIMBUR 0.00 113.84TOTAL CHECK 0.00 227.67

10100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 996001 66341 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 9,148.6710100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 941064 65631 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 4,063.1510100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 996001 66551 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 5,065.6710100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 941064 65637 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 1,559.2510100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 996001 66513 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 7,907.1510100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 995001 66551 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 5,065.6810100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 995001 66513 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 7,907.1510100 188797 06/27/13 301931 PETERSON, BRUSTAD, 995001 66341 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 9,148.67TOTAL CHECK 0.00 49,865.39

10100 188820 06/27/13 305244 WESTERVELT ECOLOGIC 995001 67400 SBFCA/GART3ER SNAKE 0.00 456.0010100 188820 06/27/13 305244 WESTERVELT ECOLOGIC 996001 67400 SBFCA/GART3ER SNAKE 0.00 144.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 600.00


SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr=’13’ and transact.period=’13’ and transact.fund in (’730’,’731’)ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/14



10100 188909 07/11/13 300880 AT&T 7350 62201 SBFCA/6−8 TO 7−7−13 0.00 4.18

10100 188910 07/11/13 304455 AT&T U−VERSE 7350 62201 SBFCA/6−8 TO 7−7−13 0.00 2.00

10100 189051 07/18/13 304614 HDR ENGINEERING, IN 7350 63201 SBFCA/MAY−JUN RENT 0.00 30.00

10100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 7350 62701 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 245.96

10100 189083 07/18/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 7350 62701 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 4,378.98

10100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 7350 62730 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 1,407.64

TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 6,068.76

TOTAL FUND 0.00 6,068.76





10100 188105 V 05/23/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 996001 66716 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 −22,294.9910100 188105 V 05/23/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 996001 66717 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 −66.9510100 188105 V 05/23/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 996001 66714 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 −41,885.9810100 188105 V 05/23/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 995001 66714 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 −41,885.9810100 188105 V 05/23/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 995001 66717 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 −66.9510100 188105 V 05/23/13 302416 BENDER ROSENTHAL, I 995001 66716 SBFCA/MAR 2013 SERV 0.00 −22,295.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 −128,495.85

10100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 995001 66412 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 34,865.1310100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 996001 66412 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 15,736.2810100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 995001 67204 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 13,875.1310100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 995001 67204 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 64,335.4610100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 996001 66411 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 28,349.4410100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 996001 66411 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 114,608.8110100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 996001 67204 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 20,316.4610100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 996001 67204 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 4,381.6210100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 996001 66412 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 34,865.1210100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 995001 66412 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 15,736.2810100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 995001 66411 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 114,608.8210100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 995001 66411 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 28,349.4510100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 941064 65638 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 241,444.0810100 188868 07/03/13 302687 ICF JONES & STOKES, 941064 65638 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 48,064.92TOTAL CHECK 0.00 779,537.00

10100 188909 07/11/13 300880 AT&T 996001 66311 SBFCA/6−8 TO 7−7−13 0.00 39.7310100 188909 07/11/13 300880 AT&T 995001 66311 SBFCA/6−8 TO 7−7−13 0.00 39.74TOTAL CHECK 0.00 79.47

10100 188910 07/11/13 304455 AT&T U−VERSE 996001 66311 SBFCA/6−8 TO 7−7−13 0.00 19.0010100 188910 07/11/13 304455 AT&T U−VERSE 995001 66311 SBFCA/6−8 TO 7−7−13 0.00 19.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 38.00

10100 188951 07/11/13 305047 MANATT PHELPS PHILL 996001 66552 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 3,500.0010100 188951 07/11/13 305047 MANATT PHELPS PHILL 995001 66552 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 3,500.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 7,000.00

10100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 992001 65641 SBFCA/APR 2013 SERV 0.00 6,178.6810100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 992001 65643 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 6,942.3810100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 995001 66504 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 1,757.0010100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 995001 66504 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 80.0010100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 996001 66504 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 80.0010100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 992001 65642 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 5,359.9610100 188953 07/11/13 201493 MBK ENGINEERS 996001 66504 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 1,757.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 22,155.02

10100 188974 07/11/13 304126 RIVERSMITH ENGINEER 996001 66804 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE 2013 0.00 1,007.5610100 188974 07/11/13 304126 RIVERSMITH ENGINEER 995001 66704 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE 2013 0.00 2,006.2210100 188974 07/11/13 304126 RIVERSMITH ENGINEER 996001 66604 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE 2013 0.00 118.0010100 188974 07/11/13 304126 RIVERSMITH ENGINEER 995001 66604 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE 2013 0.00 118.0010100 188974 07/11/13 304126 RIVERSMITH ENGINEER 996001 66704 SBFCA/MAY−JUNE 2013 0.00 2,006.22TOTAL CHECK 0.00 5,256.00





10100 189051 07/18/13 304614 HDR ENGINEERING, IN 996001 66311 SBFCA/MAY−JUN RENT 0.00 285.0010100 189051 07/18/13 304614 HDR ENGINEERING, IN 995001 66311 SBFCA/MAY−JUN RENT 0.00 285.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 570.00

10100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 996001 66514 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 910.7510100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 995001 66514 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 910.7510100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 996001 66331 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 2,336.6610100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 995001 66331 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 2,336.66TOTAL CHECK 0.00 6,494.82

10100 189083 07/18/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 996001 66521 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 6,421.3810100 189083 07/18/13 304269 SETH WURZEL CONSULT 995001 66521 SBFCA/JUNE 2013 SER 0.00 6,421.38TOTAL CHECK 0.00 12,842.76

10100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 996001 66321 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 12,219.8610100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 995001 66322 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 13,108.4710100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 996001 66322 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 13,108.4710100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 995001 66321 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 12,219.8610100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 995001 66512 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 36,715.3510100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 941064 65630 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 12,606.0010100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 992001 65641 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 1,331.0010100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 996001 66512 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 36,715.3610100 8001022 07/11/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 991068 65637 SBFCA/MAY 2013 SERV 0.00 77.00TOTAL CHECK 0.00 138,101.37


TOTAL FUND 0.00 843,578.59

TOTAL REPORT 0.00 849,647.35





10100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 995001 66322 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 2,861.7310100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 995001 66321 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 18,370.3110100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 991068 65638 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 1,771.0010100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 941064 65630 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 3,389.0010100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 996001 66512 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 36,043.9810100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 995001 66512 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 36,043.9710100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 996001 66321 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 18,370.3110100 8000945 06/06/13 301265 DOWNEY BRAND ATTORN 996001 66322 SBFCA/APRIL 2013 SE 0.00 2,861.72TOTAL CHECK 0.00 119,712.02

TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,844,747.86

TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,844,747.86

TOTAL REPORT 0.00 4,968,809.88





10100 188899 07/03/13 96963 Y−S ECONOMIC DEVELO 7350 63201 CR/JULY 2013 RENT 0.00 25.00

10100 188978 07/11/13 305033 SDRMA 7350 64301 SBFCA/1ST QTR 13/14 0.00 54.90

10100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 7350 62701 SBFCA/JUL 2013 SERV 0.00 516.49

TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 596.39

TOTAL FUND 0.00 596.39





10100 188899 07/03/13 96963 Y−S ECONOMIC DEVELO 995001 66311 CR/JULY 2013 RENT 0.00 237.5010100 188899 07/03/13 96963 Y−S ECONOMIC DEVELO 996001 66311 CR/JULY 2013 RENT 0.00 237.50TOTAL CHECK 0.00 475.00

10100 188978 07/11/13 305033 SDRMA 995001 66311 SBFCA/1ST QTR 13/14 0.00 521.5510100 188978 07/11/13 305033 SDRMA 996001 66311 SBFCA/1ST QTR 13/14 0.00 521.55TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,043.10

10100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 995001 66331 SBFCA/JUL 2013 SERV 0.00 4,906.6510100 189056 07/18/13 304090 KIM FLOYD COMMUNICA 996001 66331 SBFCA/JUL 2013 SERV 0.00 4,906.65TOTAL CHECK 0.00 9,813.30


TOTAL FUND 0.00 11,331.40

TOTAL REPORT 0.00 11,927.79

Item 6


August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director Scott Shapiro, General Counsel

SUBJECT: Out of State Travel to Attend U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Civil Works

Review Board

Recommended Action Approve out of state travel by Mike Inamine, Scott Shapiro and Michael Bessette to attend the Civil Works Review Board. Background The Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (SBFCA) is advancing the Feather River West Levee Project (FRWLP), a public safety project that directly impacts the lives and livelihoods of approximately 88,000 people in an economically disadvantaged community that has suffered numerous failures of the Feather River west levee, including the deadly and devastating 1955 flood. The FRWLP is funded by an assessment created in 2010 and imposed by SBFCA on all benefited properties in the Sutter Basin. Separately, SBFCA and the State of California are non-Federal partners on the Sutter Basin Project Feasibility Study, a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers study which will likely recommend that Congress fund levee improvements for the Sutter Basin. This study has been ongoing since 2000 and has recently made tremendous progress. As the study comes to completion, the Corps is required to present the draft study to a Civil Works Review Board. This is a board of senior Corps officials that provides one final review of the proposed study and project and makes a recommendation to the Chief of Engineers on whether the Chief should recommend the project to Congress. Discussion A Sutter Basin Civil Works Review Board meeting has been scheduled for September 18, with a full day trial run on September 17. It is traditional for non-Federal sponsors to participate and offer support for the study and the project. We have learned that Keith Swanson, Chief of the Division of Flood Management of DWR will be attending. Staff proposes that Mike Inamine, Scott Shapiro, and Michael Bessette attend to represent the local interests in the project and the proposal for Federal funding. The potential for Federal funding is an important backstop in the event of FRWLP cost overruns or shortages in State funding for the FRWLP. Fiscal Impact The cost of travel is included within the 5 year capital budget. There is no net budgetary impact as a result of board approval of the recommended action

1 Item 7

Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency

A Partnership for Flood Safety

August 14, 2013 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director Michael Bessette, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: Receive and file Program/Project Update Report

Recommendation Receive and file the August 2013 Program/Project Update report. Background The purpose of this report is to provide a regular, monthly update on program and project activities of the Agency: Engineering Design The engineering design team is focusing its attention on two fronts; engineering support services during construction, and engineering design services for Project Areas B and D. Construction support services include contractor submittals review for conformance to contract documents, addressing contractor requests for information, utility relocation coordination, construction oversight, and coordination with the construction management team. The design team is also focusing on advancing the 65% plans and specifications for Project Areas B and D to a 90% design level. Activities for this effort include levee repair design refinement, additional field investigations in the tailings area, borrow area assessments of potential sites, and addressing the IPE and Agency comments received on the 65% design for Areas B and D last year. The 90% design for those two areas is due later this month. The next IPE meeting is set for September 25 and 26 and will include both design review (Project Areas B and D) and project construction observation (Project Area C). Borrow site activities are ongoing and focused on securing borrow for Project Area D. Coordination with the City of Biggs continues to occur and geotechnical testing of one of the City’s identified sites for a sewage detention pond is in process. Initial results of the testing have been favorable and additional tests will be conducted in the near future. Geotechnical tests will also be performed in the tailings area just south of Thermalito Afterbay once property access rights are secured. Tailings material will be used to construct landside seepage berms in the northerly limits of the project. Construction Management (Project Area C) Activities in advance of actual levee construction have been quite active since the multiple Notices to Proceed have been issued to the contractor. New and revised contract submittals are arriving daily. The construction management and design team are quickly processing these to ensure all approvals are in place and everything is on track to start construction. The contractor is installing storm water pollution prevention best management practice facilities, construction fencing, and conducting exploratory borings for the deep mix method wall installation in Reach 13. Additional current work activities include pre-construction surveys,

2 Item 7

removal of extraneous facilities such as emergency call boxes, equipment mobilization, construction of a public access at the Shanghai Bend parking lot, levee stripping, and borrow site preparation. The first official “ground breaking” construction activities on the levee occurred on July 25 after 408 approval and receipt of the CVFPB permit, which was received on July 23. The CM team assisted in the public outreach meeting on July 24. The intent of the meeting was to introduce the public to SBFCA staff CM team, and contractor team, and to educate the public on 2013 construction activities and schedule. The meeting was well attended and the goals for the meeting were met. Additional CM activities for the month included: coordination with environmental team, right of way team, and public outreach manager, review and coordination of contractor submittals, review of contractor submitted value engineering proposal in Reach 13 (deep mix method wall installation), review and coordination of contractor submitted proposal to close gap at PG&E gas line in Reach 13, completing pre-construction Quality Assurance photographs and surveys. Environmental Documentation and Permitting It has been a busy and successful month on the permitting front; all the outstanding permits needed for construction were received. The Final EIS official 30-day ‘cooling off’ was completed on July 15, allowing USACE to prepare a Record of Decision (ROD) and issue our Section 408 Permit. The 408 permit was issued for Reach 13 initially and we expect the 408 permit for the remainder of the project to be issued in August. Receipt of the 408 marks the culmination of a huge effort by the SBFCA Board, staff, the consulting team, member agencies, community groups and our Congressional representatives in Washington DC, in getting the USACE to expedite the 408 review and approval process. Upon receipt of the 408 from the USACE, the Central Valley Flood Project Board took only one day to issue their permit for construction, and we also received the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. We now have all the permits needed to commence construction. A new issue has arisen that has the potential to impact 2013 construction activities. Due to the close proximately of Reach 13 to the Sutter County Airport, coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is required. This coordination began in March 2013 with the airport (through Sutter County’s Deputy Director of General Services) and the FAA to determine potential impacts to the Airport. Wood Rodgers, SBFCA’s civil design lead for the 2013 construction work, submitted Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction, to the FAA. This filing prompted the need for the FAA to perform Aeronautical Studies along the project alignment to determine potential impacts to flight operations regionally. The results of the studies were issued in batches by the FAA between the months of May and July, 2013. In July, several study points (located near the airport) were returned with the result “Notice of Presumed Hazard”. It was subsequently proposed by the contractor to utilize different (and taller) equipment to construct the deep cutoff wall in the area of 2013 work. After evaluating the proposal and understanding the benefits to the Project, SBFCA accepted the change in construction method. Wood Rodgers discussed the change in equipment height with the FAA, and was directed to resubmit study points which were located in the vicinity of the airport for further analysis. SBFCA is currently awaiting the return of these studies (submitted on July 11, 2013), and is not able to determine from the FAA when they will be available. SBFCA is also closely coordinating with Sutter County on the potential to temporarily close the airport when construction activities are within the areas of airspace concern. We anticipate the duration of this closure would be a maximum of 45 days and a minimum of 20 days.

3 Item 7

Right of Way The right of way acquisition process is continuing in Project Areas C, D and B. Purchase offers have been made to nearly all property owners in Project Area C. To date, the Agency has accepted offers from 14 property owners and negotiations are ongoing with the remainder. In Project Area D, notices have been sent to the property owners to schedule site inspections for appraisal purposes, and a majority of the inspections have been conducted. In Project Area B, we are sending notices to the property owners to schedule site inspections for appraisal purposes. We are on schedule to obtain the necessary property rights for construction in 2013 and 2014. Staff continues to meet regularly with property owners upon request to answer questions and facilitate the acquisition process.

State & Local Funding and Coordination The process of acquiring needed State funding for construction continues to advance. As previously noted, DWR issued a Funding Commitment Letter on May 31, 2013 for approximately $57 million for Project Area C. The Construction Funding Agreement is now finalized and will be routed to the State Department of General Services for final processing and approval. Over the last month, SBFCA and DWR Staff have worked through issues to ensure that SBFCA continues to receive the highest available cost share for FRWLP related expenses. Since last reported in July, SBFCA staff and its consultants have worked diligently to respond to DWR comments on invoices previously submitted as part of the Design Funding Agreement. SBFCA staff expects to receive funding under this agreement within the next 60 days once DWR has received and reviewed all responses to comments. As previously reported, on June 25, SBFCA made its first draw on its Project Funds from its 2013 Assessment Revenue Bonds in the amount of $5,733,376.09. This initial draw leaves approximately $34.27 million in Project Funds available to fund project expenses. At its last Board Meeting, the Board authorized staff to invest project fund proceeds with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The benefit of this action is that interest costs will be reduced by the earning of investment in the fund. Last month, SBFCA staff worked with our trustee and LAIF to open the accounts and on August 2, $27 million of project proceeds were deposited in the fund leaving $7.27 million with our trustee.

Corps Feasibility Study Pilot Project The draft Feasibility Study Report was released for public review via notice in the Federal Register on June 14. The 45 day comment period closed on July 29. Very few comments were received. USACE is working to address the comments, close out the various reviews, and prepare a final Feasibility Report by August 21. The most significant issues at this point appear to be vegetation and growth inducement. Staff is working with USACE to address these issues, but at this point it appears resolution is in the hands of USACE/HQ. These are policy level, “catch 22” issues that appear to be stalling the remaining 408 permission. Mike Inamine, Michael Bessette, and Scott Shapiro are proposed to attend and present at the Civil Works Review Board meeting at USACE/HQ on September 18. There is a separate item on the agenda to consider approval of staff travel for that purpose. The CWRB is the key study milestone where USACE, with sponsor input, provides final direction into the Chief’s Report.

4 Item 7

Future activities include achieving Federal cost sharing on the remainder of the LPP, facilitating completion of the Chief’s Report, including the project in WRDA, and resolution of final project accounting. Regional Planning The Feather River Regional Flood Management Planning team recently completed the first detailed draft of the plan which is under internal review. An internal plan review and comment meeting has been scheduled for August 22. A meeting was held in July with the Yuba Sutter Farm Bureau to discuss the planning effort and the Bureau committed to providing members to stay engaged in the planning effort. In addition the California Farm Bureau submitted comments on the plan framework which are under review.

On August 2, the FRRFMP team met with members of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, landowners, DWR, and the Mid & Upper Sacramento River Regional Flood Management Team to discuss the CVFPB’s pending resolution to cost share in the USACE Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study. The current study scope includes evaluation of a Feather River Bypass via widening of the Cherokee Canal. The FRRFMP team expressed doubts regarding this proposal and the many challenges associated with revisiting this proposal so soon after the public outcry surrounding the adoption of the 2012 CVFPP.

The program can be accessed at www.frrfmp.com, and a project hotline has been established (530-845-5988).

Fiscal Impact

This is an informational item only with no fiscal impact to the Agency.

http://www.frrfmp.com/

Items 7-10


August 14, 2013

Item 8 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director SUBJECT: Other reports from Agency staff and consultants

This time has been set aside on the agenda for other reports from Agency staff and consultants. Item 9 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report by the Citizens’ Assessment District Advisory Committee

This time has been set aside on the agenda for a report from the CADAC and Board discussion (if necessary).

Item 10 TO: Board of Directors FROM Mike Inamine, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report (if necessary) by member and partner agencies

This time has been set aside on the agenda for a report and discussion (if necessary) by member and partner agency representatives.

Item 11 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Inamine, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report on correspondence sent by and received by the Board

This time has been set aside on the agenda for Board discussion and staff response (if necessary) regarding correspondence received by the Agency. Fiscal Impact The above items are informational only with no fiscal impact to the Agency.

sutter butte flood control agencysutterbutteflood.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/board-agenda... ·...

Documents