suzana milevska internalisation ljubljana
TRANSCRIPT
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 1/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 2/57
Museum of Contemporary Art – Skopje, 1967
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 3/57
• The Museum of Contemporary Art was
established in1964 as a political decisionput forward with an Act of the Skopje City
Assembly, in order to host the collection of
the art works that hundreds of international
artists donated to the city immediatelyafter the catastrophic 1963 Skopje
earthquake.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 4/57
• With an exhibition area of over 3500 m2 and
total area of 5000 m2 with depots, cinema,
archives, library and other rooms serving thepurpose of this exceptionally important cultural
institution the new Museum building opened in
1970 as one of few museums of contemporary
art in the region.
• The project of the Museum building itself was
also a donation to the city by the Polisharchitects: J. Mokrzynski, E. Wierzbicki and W.
Klyzewski.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 5/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 6/57
• Today the fund of donated works consists of around 4600 art works by several hundreds of artists in various media but the acquisitions are
rare and incidental.
• The works of the internationally well-known artistsare of special importance, but most of the worksthat are now in the museum depot either belong tothe early modernism and Czech Cubism (JanŠtursa, Václav Spála, Emil Filla, František Muzika,Jindrich Stýrský, Vojtech Preissig) or date from1950s -1970s: Fernand Léger, André Masson,
Pablo Picasso, Hans Hartung, Victor Vasarely,Alexander Calder, Pierre Soulages, HenrykStaževski, Alberto Burri, Christo, Enrico Bay,Robert Jacobsen, Etienne Hajdu, Zoltan Kemeny,Robert Adams, Emilio Vedova, Antoni Clavé,
Georg Baselitz...
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 7/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 8/57
A polemic between Suzana Milevska and Viktorija Vasev Dimeska,
consisted of 7 texts published from 10 September – 16 October, 1990 that
was triggered by the text “The Perfectionism of the Obedient – or why the 2
Youth Biennial looks so classical”, Republika, 10 September 1990
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 9/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 10/57
Gallery 7, a tea shop,
hangout of ZERO group
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 11/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 12/57
Aleksandar Stankoski, The Last Supper, 1996
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 13/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 14/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 15/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 16/57
The statement "Hierarchies do not exist" offers an
example of performative contradiction referring to the very
capacity of making a statement, because the statement
itself is a hierarchy of semiotic relations of letters (as
symbols) formed into words (as signifiers) formed into a
sentence (as a statement).
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 17/57
• The vicious circle of institutional critique stems
out of its dichotomic nature. It inevitably entails a
certain position that exists out of or beyond anyinstitution in contrast to the criticised
institutional position.
• It implies a severe critique of the supposedlyautocratic (powerful) institutions and their
governance, in contrast to preferred democratic
(weak) institutions that by all accounts are
expected to deal with art and cultural production
in a more creative and liberal way.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 18/57
• I want to argue that because of this
dichotomy any institutional critique‟sdiscourse paradoxically becomes
dangerously internalised, similarly to the
biopower and biopolitics that are initially itstargets. [i]
•
[i] Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri,Empire, London: Harvard University Press,
23-27.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 19/57
• I am interested in tackling the set of questions that derive from such intrinsicdichotomic split within the institutional critique
that as its result has “unhappyconsciousness.” Such divided mode of consciousness Hegel called the "unhappyconsciousness" because the self is in conflictwith itself when there is no unity between self and other. [ii]
•[ii] Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,Phenomenology of Spirit, Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1979, 119-139.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 20/57
• This "unhappy consciousness" of
the institutional critique is the
institutional consciousness that isconscious of itself as being
divided internally and as not being
able to reconcile itself with its"other" – the institutional system.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 21/57
• On the other hand, the undivided
consciousness would be a dual self-consciousness which brings unity to the
self and the "other." In this text want to
argue that what stands behind the“unhappy consciousness” of theinstitutional critique is the performative
contradiction of contemporary societytoday that prevents such unity to take
place.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 22/57
• the question to be asked here is what if sucha completely independent position of
institutional critique (beyond any institution)can not exist; what if one can utter relevantstatements only when there is a certaininstitutional framework (weak or strong) from
which position one speaks. Does this indicatethat the position of any institutional critique isthat of a double dialectics, always alreadysimultaneously self-legitimising and self-
legitimated and therefore strong butquestionable in implying the oppositionalshortcomings exactly because of relying onself-legitimated strength?
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 23/57
• The main paradox of the institutional critique is that atfirst sight it seems as if such position implies thatbecause of such performative contradiction anyinstitutional critique is always already impossible, aposited contradiction within itself in which theinterlocutors are entrapped since they deny thepossibility for communication and understanding. [iii]However, even if it were so, it would be relevant to
discuss the potentialities for other possible directions intransitional institutional critique in the context of thecountries of South East Europe.
•[iii] Habermas, Jürgen, “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a
Program of Philosophical Justification” in Habermas,Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans.C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholsen (Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press, 1990), 89.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 24/57
• However what could be more evident
that the institutional critique is stillpossible and very much alive than that
individuals and communities still step
aside from the society, pass judgmenton it, and break free from the bonds of
ideology. By questioning and pursuing
truth these “rebels” could hope toachieve a kind of institutional
emancipation.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 25/57
• If we try to recuperate the need for
institutional critique in post-socialistcontext from this perspective, despite of allcontradictions, the question from whichpolitical or social position such institutional
critique would speak becomes crucial(much more relevant than any professionalposition). Because of the crisis of legitimation and state authority in thetransitional period the institutional critiquebecame possible in more general andpolitical terms, and not only in terms of art
or cultural institutions.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 26/57
• Therefore, it makes a big difference whether theinstitutional critique is:
• a singular position of an artist or culture producer
• a position of self-organised but not formalisedcommunity of art and culture producers
• a neo-liberal governmental position
• a conservative (nationalist) critique, or
• a non-governmental – democratic civic societyorganisation
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 27/57
• It is important to emphasise that even
though each of the above mentionedpositions entails different starting point
some of the objectives of these different
positions overlap and intertwine. Only if the agents of the institutional critique are
aware that their questions are formulated
from a certain institutional platform there
can be any relevant impact of the
institutional critique on the overall society.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 28/57
• Self-consciousness of the institutional
critique is contradictory because it is
conscious of both sameness and otherness.The contradictions of governmentality, self-
governance and self-organisation are only
few of these contradictions.
• The fundamental challenge of each
government is how to govern but not toomuch or as Michel Foucault famously put it:
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 29/57
• „The suspicion that one always risks governing
too much is inhabited by the question: Why, infact one must govern?...In other words, what
makes it necessary for there to be a
government, and what ends should it pursue
with regard to society in order to justify itsexistence?‟ [iv]
• [iv] Foucault, Michael, Ethics, Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Editor: Paul Rabinow, New
York: The New Press, 1997, 74-75.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 30/57
• The “art of government” for Foucault isactually something that does not entail any
universalised distinction between differentgoverning systems.
• „Instead of making the distinction betweenstate and civil society into a historicaluniversal that allows us to examine all theconcrete systems, we can try to see it as aform of schematization characteristic of aparticular technology of government.‟ [v]
• [v] Foucault 75.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 31/57
• According to Gerald Raunig „not only resistiveindividuals, but also progressive institutions andcivil society NGOs operate on the same plane of
governmentality.‟ [vi]• The main attribute of parrhesia is not the
possession of truth, which is made public in acertain situation, but the taking of the risk, the „factthat a speaker says something dangerous -something other than what the majority believes.‟[vii]
• [vi] Raunig, Gerald, „The Double Criticism of parrhesia:Answering the Question "What is a Progressive (Art)Institution?"‟ 18 September 2007<http://www.republicart.net/disc/institution/raunig04_en.pgf > 1.
• [vii] Raunig, „The Double Criticism‟ 2.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 32/57
• Raunig actually refers to Foucault‟s statementthat makes difference between “classical Greekconception of parrhesia” - constituted by the one
who dare “to tell the truth to other people” and anew truth game which entails being “courageousenough to disclose the truth about oneself ." [viii]
• The activity of uttering truth is much moreimportant than truth put in opposition to the lie or to something "false."
•
• [viii] Michel Foucault, Diskurs und Wahrheit,Berlin 1996, p.14 (cf. discussion of parrhesia inEnglish:<http://foucault.info/documents/parrhesia/>, 150,quoted according to Raunig, „The Double
Criticism of parrhesia‟ 2.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 33/57
• According to Raunig a productive game
emerges through the relationship betweenactivists and institution so that the socialcriticism and institutional criticismintertwine the political and personalparrhesia. It is only by linking the twoparrhesia techniques that a one-sidedinstrumentalization can be avoided, that
the institutional machine is saved fromclosing itself off, that the flow betweenmovement and institution can bemaintained.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 34/57
• Instead assuming that the institution internalisedthe power through the instruments of governing
only because it is an institution that standshigher on the hierarchy, perhaps it would bemore constructive to remember that theinstitutions of power are all around us and thatbiopolitics reaches much further than only in itsown institution. The acknowledgment of thiscomplex entanglement of the power, itsinstitutions and its critique could bring us closer to a sober and refined critical position that would
be up to the job of institutional critique of todayin which process different institutions couldcontribute with both critiquing of the others‟practices but also with self-critical approach.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 35/57
• Therefore, in addition to Raunig‟s proposal for applying of parrhesia as a double strategy (as
an attempt of engagement in a process of refutation, and as self-questioning) I wouldsuggest that the dialogical critique offers a moreappropriate model of institutional critique in
terms of positive agency of action. I suggest thata kind of deconstruction of the one-way critiqueinherited by the 70s and 90s institutional critiquemodels would entail collaborative policy thatcould engage both state and independentinstitutions on the same critical projects in order to suggest and promote institutional activity asconstructive institutional self-developingcriticality.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 36/57
• In particularly the shift in the institutional critique can bediscussed by taking into consideration the shift of the
role of the contemporary art museums in SEE and thechange of their monopoly position in the regional artscene that occurred because of some new criticalcuratorial practices and of the appearance of smallindependent but very active art institutions such as kuda-
Novi Sad, p74 – Ljubljana, WHW-Zagreb, Remont-Belgrade, press to exit project space – Skopje, Stacion –Prishtina, etc.
• Especially relevant are some recent collaborationsbetween the state and non-governmental initiatives andprojects that tend to overcome the performativecontradiction in institutional critique and its unhappy consciousness or some projects that deal with the
institutional critique in a more positive and visionary way.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 37/57
• From 2004 dates a series of ten digital
photographs “Legend About the “legen”(Mac. bucket) that the artist SašoStanojkoviќ took in the upper floor of theMuseum of Contemporary Art. The
photographs show the colourful plasticbucket installation that instead of the
collection was “hosted” by the Museum for
almost fifteen years (reproduced inContemporary, London, Nu.70, 2005, 20.)
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 38/57
Saso Stanojkovik, The Legend about Legen (bucket), 2004
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 39/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 40/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 41/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 42/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 43/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 44/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 45/57
• Taking into account that floods of dirty
„rivers‟ are frequent sights in the Museum
after each rainy day some projects
exhibited in the Museum (such as theMozart’s Boat by Antoni Maznevski
consisting of a 6.5 m wooden boat that
was also presented in Venice), soundedas a critique even when they were not
meant to be.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 46/57
Yane Calovski and Hristina Ivanoska │ Oskar Hansen’s Museum of Modern Art │
a series of 12 original posters in limited edition
(in close collaboration with the German designer: Ariane Spanier)
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 47/57
The project presents a hypothetical program of the “lost”
museum designed by Oskar Hansen in 1966 for the
competition for the contemporary art museum in Skopje.
The competition for the best design of a new art institution
was organized by the Polish government as a gesture of
solidarity with the earthquake tragedy on 26th of July 1963,
and was open exclusively to architects from Poland and
other Eastern Block countries.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 48/57
Oskar Hansen‟s proposal was based on peculiar
assumptions: the museum was to consist of “a
transformable exhibition space, able to fold completely and
then unfold into various combinations, with hexagonal
elements lifted by hydraulically-powered rotating
telescopes.” In this way the structure would transform in
horizontal and vertical dimensions at the same time.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 49/57
In the proposal the architect wrote:
“Art in its development is unpredictable.
We have assumed that a contemporary gallery should
pursue the unknown in art.
It shouldn’t only aim at exhibiting artworks, but also
encouraging and provoking their birth.”
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 50/57
Hansen‟s design was not implemented.
The jury finally selected a design submitted
by a team of three Polish architects:
W. Klyzewski, J. Mokrzynski and E. Wierzbicki
and the Museum of Contemporary Art that was
established with the collection of donated works
already in 1964 was built according to their project in 1967.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 51/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 52/57
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 53/57
• Reconstruction of the Museum buildingMarch - October 2007
•• With the financial support of the Decentralization Programme in the Fields
of Education and Culture of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, it ispossible to approach this year to the project for reconstruction of the roof of the Skopje Museum of Contemporary Art, and to solve the problem that isfor several years a serious obstacle in the work of the Museum.
•• The reconstruction project was made to repair structurally damaged parts of
the roof and to stop its leaking and threatening devastation of the building.
•• The project will bring back to use the entire museum space, and most
importantly it will enable regular exhibition program with the preciousmuseum collection, which was closed for several years due to badconditions. The project also considers complete interior reconstruction andredesigning of one of the main rooms for temporary exhibitions, and in order to enable better security, lighting and climate conditions.
•• The works started in March and were completed in October 2007. The total
value of investment is around € 350.000. The management of the overallprogramme has been entrusted to the International Management Group(IMG).
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 54/57
today
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 55/57
today
New investments in culture:- obvious preferences for antiquity and
archaeology rather than for contemporary
art
- an attempt to stage a context for a newly
constructed continuity in the Macedonian
identity since antiquity with renaming of
streets and institutions, commissions of public monuments of personalities from
antic history, etc.
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 56/57
The building of the Government Republic of Macedonia, since 2007
8/7/2019 Suzana Milevska Internalisation Ljubljana
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/suzana-milevska-internalisation-ljubljana 57/57
Alexander the Great, 12 m,