sw - digital.library.unt.edu/67531/metadc699461/m2/1/high... · louis vierne, charles tournemire,...
TRANSCRIPT
THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF FIVE FRENCH ORGAN
COMPOSERS FROM WIDOR TO THE PRESENT TIME
THESIS
Presented to the Graduate Council of the North
Texas State Teachers College in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements
Frr the Degree of
MASTER OF MUSIC
By
Mary Elizabeth Wright, B. A.
WIchita Falls, Texas
August, 1941
IQ!9,8
/SW
~9'0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF
Chapter
ILLUSTRATIONS * . * . . . .*..*
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY * #..
II. THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF CHARLESMARIE WIDOR . . . . .
III. THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF LOUISVIERNE . * . . . . ..* 0
IV. THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF CHARLESTOURNEMIRE. . . . .*
V. THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF MARCELDUPRE . . . . . . . * .* .
VI. THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF JOSEPHBONNET . . . . . . . .
VII. CONCLUSIONS -# a a a a a a.
APPENDIX . . . .
BIBLIOGRAPHY - a
. a a a a. a ,
- a 0 a a .a
Page. iv
. I
. 9
. 42
. a 59
. . 82
* . 92
. a 95
. . 121
iii
.
.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
1. Five-measure plaintive section for soloreed, appearing between episodes, builtupon themes. (Taken from "Prelude,"
ymphonie III, by Charles Marie Widor. .
2. ABA lassie form (Taken from "Minuetto,"Symphonie III by Charles MarieWidor . . . . . . . . . .
3. Extended pedal point. (Taken from"Minuett,"'Sye III by CharlesWidor, .
4. Strict canon between soprano and tenorwith a single measure between.(Taken from "Adagio," Symphonie Ill,by Charles Marie Widor . . . . . 25
5. Fugue form: Subject' beginning on thedominant tone. , , . . . . . . 27
6. Original, delicate scherzo theme,stating the character part of thefirst movement. (Taken from"Scher zo"Symphonie TV, Charles Marie Widor , . 29
7. Canon over double pedal in middle sec-tion. (Taken from "Scherzo,"SshneIV.* . . . . . . . 30
8. Pedal solo for four foot flute, withfour voices above, for stings andceleste. (Taken from Fifth SMphoy,by Charles Marie Widor . . . . . 32
9. Recitative-like passage following thefirst presentation of the maintheme.. (Taken PromI "Al6gro,"Symphonic VI.), . . . . . . . 34
10. Canon form in the middle section,(Taken from "Intermezzo," Symphonie
VI.) - e . . . . . . . . .36
iv
V
Figure
11. Treatment of arpeggios. (Taken from "Finale,"Symphonie VI, by Charles Marie Widor .
Page
37
12. Use of pedal theme. (Taken from "Prelude,"First Symhonie, by Louis Vierne.) . . . 48
13, Canonic limitations influenced by Franck,(Taken from "Allegro Vivace Fir'stSymphonie, by Louis Viernel
14. Theme in the pedals. (Taken from'Vinale,'" First Symphotie by LouisVierne.) 77. . . . .
15. Canonic imitations, between pedals andmanuals., (Taken from "Finale" FirstSymphonie, by Louis Vierne.)
. . 50
510 .*
. . 52
16. Theme in unison by manusls and pedals.(Taken from "Allegro," ThirdSymphonie, by Louis Viern) . ...
17. Doleful melody running throughoutcantilene, (Taken from "Cantilene,Third 2phonie, by Louis Vierne). .
18. A tender, sad melody characteristic ofthe whole movement. (Taken from"Adagib ",Third Symphnie, by LouisVierne.S . , , . . . . .
19. First theme against rushing toccatafigurations, (Taken from "FinaleThird SMhonie, by Louis Vierne).
20. Syncopation in the tenor voice. (Takenfrom L'Orgue Mystique by CharlesTournemire. . . . . . . ..
21. Pedal point and harmonic structures.(Taken from "Suite evocatriee pour GrandOrgue," by Charles Tournemire).
22. Rhythmic and harmonic structure of compo-sition for manuals only. (Ttken fromJeu Doux et Voix HunMaine by Charle sTournemire ) . *. #. 0* .00.
54
54
55
55
65
67
vi
Figure
23, Three-measure choral theme. (Taken'from No. 1, Le Chemin de I. Croix,by Marcel Thpre) F. . . . .
Page
* 75
24. Introduction of the theme between twostrettos above fAgue subject in thepedal. (Taken from Trois Preludes etRuus, byMarcelDupre . . .
25, First statement of theme based on tradi-tional French Noel, developed in styleof free improvisations. (Taken fromVariations Sur Un Noel by parcelDupre . . . . . . . . . . .
26* Dissonance. (Taken from Deuxieme Symphon!eby Marcel Oupre) . . . . . . .
27. Opening measure portraying solemn pro-cession. (Taken from Corte eet Litanie,by Marcel Dupre). . , . . . .
28. Statement of the theme. (Taken from Vari-ations de Concert, by Joseph Bonnet).
29. First variation in soprano, harmonizedwith upper voices and accompaniedby staccato bass figure. (Taken fromVariations de Concert by JosephBonnet.) . . . . . . . . . .
30. Second variations, with theme in thepedal. (Taken from Variations deConcert, by Joseph Bonnet).
31, Third Variation, chorale-prelude, withtheme in the tenor, (Taken fromVariations de Concert, by Joseph
n eT ) . . . . . . . . . . .
77
78
78
81
88
88
. . 89
89
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY
Statement of the Problem
Five French organ composers, representative of the
period from Widor to the present timee, are identified in
this study, and a comparative analysis of the works of each
is made. The introduction includes the source of the data,
the scope of the problem, the purpose of the study, the
method of procedure, a brief historical background of the
new French school of music, general characteristics of
modern French music, and specific idioms of contemporary
French organ composers, as exemplified in the works of the
organists selected: Charles Marie Widor, Louis Vierne,
Charles Tournemire, Marcel Dupre, and Joseph Bonnet. The
compositions and musical contributions of Widor, Vierne,
Tournemire, Dupre, and Bonnet, respectively, are discussed
in Chapter II through Chapter VI. Chapter VII states a
summary of the study and the conclusions drawn,
Source of the Data
In September, 1940, the study of modern French or-
ganists was begun. The following libraries were used for
intensive research: North Texas State Teachers College,
Texas State College for Women, Hardin Junior College,
1
2
Southern Methodist University, and University of Texas.
Much available material and information were obtained
through correspondence with noted organists, publishers,
and librarians; through conferences with leading teachers
in the field of organ and theory in Denton, Wichita Falls,
and Dallas; and through collected program notes.
Scope of the Problem
In order to select the five most outstanding and most
representative French organ composers of the period from
Widor to the present, the writer corresponded with author-
ities in the field, asking each whom he considered greatest.
After compiling evaluations from answers received, a final
estimate was derived from all the available information
which named these organ composers: Charles Marie Widor,
Louis Vierne, Charles Tournemire, Marcel Dupre, and Joseph
Bonnet.
Purpose of the Problem
The purpose of this study is not so much to determine
the degree of greatness of each composer, but to discover
and to develop a deeper appreciation of the specific con-
tributions of each to modern music. The writer hopes that
this paper will prove interesting, stimulating, and helpful
to serious organ students, and that it may be a stimulus of
encouragement toward their own creative achievements.
See Appendix for letters quoted.
Procedure
After the selection of composers was made, correspond-
ence with other noteworthy organists in the United States
concerning the selected composers resulted in interesting
and valuable comments. Certain letters received are2
quoted.
A careful, critical analysis of materials representa-
tive of each of the composers was made, pointing out spe-
cific characteristics as to style, form, thematic material,
rhythmic patterns, melodic line, and harmonic treatments.
This examination of musical scores was followed by a de".
scriptive comparison of the contributions discovered.
Historical Background
Modern French Music.--If one thoroughly understands
the musical contributions of the French organ composers
under discussion, he must know something of the historical
background leading -up to the founding of the new French
school of music. In the middle of the nineteenth century,
there were two schools of literature: the romantic, which
was characterized by freedom of fancy both in conception
and treatment, and the naturalistic, which relied upon sug-
gestion rather than upon complete expression. The new ar-
tistic conscience and fresh tastes in France were awakened
by the calamitous events of the Franco-Prussian War of 1870,
in which the French suffered overwhelming defeat at the
Ibid.
4
downfall of the Empire and the establishment of the3
Republic.
It may have been on account of the paucity ofnative impulse toward musical creativeness that theFrench government in the early 70's sent out BourgaultDucoudray to the Near East to bring home discoveriesthat the world would inspire young artists.4
Influencing the growth of music in France since 1870
were two things: the Wagnerian movement, and the teaching
of Cesar Franck, who resuscitated the spirit of John5
Sebastian Bach. Franck was the first to break away from
Wagner. He found himself at the head of a school, the6
French School of modern musical composition.
General teristics of Modern French Music.--In
reviving and enlarging the classical form, Franck made
the link between classicism and the polyphony to come. He
was the greatest educational force in contemporary Franck
music. Some of the new tendencies begun by Cesar Franck
are: increased use of the orchestra; less strict reso-
lution rules, as in consecutive sevenths; parallelism for
specific effect; changes in frequent modulations and keys;
explainable dissonances; chromatic counterpoint; deep reli-
gious feeling and the use of modes in church music; organ
3Charles Downer Hazen, Europe Since 1815, pp. 252-253.
4Katherine Ruth Heyman, The Relation of Ultra-Modern
to Archaic Music, p. 26.5Vincent d'Indy, Cesar Franck, p. 5o
6C. F. (Abdy) Williams, The Story of n Music, p.
14$.a
5
point; the use of the thirteenth chord, formerly considered
a suspension; chord progressions in minor thirds instead of
in fifths; harmonic melodies dependent upon intervals; and
chromaticism.
With the last half of the nineteenth century came
charm, mysticism, power of joy through religious effusion,
new metres, styles, and techniques, fresh melodic, rhythmic,
and harmonic devices; good taste; purity of artistic and
ethical ideas; and subject matters characteristic of French
arts.
Specific Idioms of Contemporary FrenchOrgan Composers
The French school of organ composition has been reared
on the fact that the organist must exploit new resources of
the organ not for an artistic goal, but for a means of7
musical expression* In no other country has organ achieved
such a high place of honor, nor have so many contemporary
composers interested themselves in organ. The organ com-
posItions of France are unsurpassed in intrinsic merit.
This new French school was influenced by the liturgical
music of the church. The teaching of the great Lemmens in
the "Bach style" is seen in musical thought and register.
Other characteristics of the "modern French school" are the
progressive tendency in modality and harmonization, and in
improvision, whether as a means of technical development in
Wallace Goodrich, The Qrg In France, Prefaet p. XI.
6
study or as a form of musical expression.
French Organists place as high a value upon the art of
improvisation as upon composition, It forms the basis of
instruction in the conservatories, ad is indispensable in
the church. Fuque with obbligato pedal has become a famil-
iar Idiom. Some organists presage the influence of modern
impressionism on organ music, but this feature will not
likely become widespread. Since conditions of life in the
present century demand a new form of artistic expression,
twentieth century organ music is a combination of the
traditional and the experimental, using medieval plainsong
frequently in its harmonic settings. This factor is one of
the distinguishing characteristics of modern French organ
music.
Form
Regardless of revolutionary changes in French organ
music, the form remains basic. There is much freedom in
imagination and in variation In sectional form.
Melodic interest in contemporary music is of two types:
first, ecclesiastical, composed of the Gregorian Chant, as
in "Salve Regina" from Widor's Symphony II, (Figure 19),
and Latin hymns, as in Taurnemire's "Triple Choral"; and
second, secular, composed of chorales on folk tune and
original theme by the composer as in "Intermezzo" from
Widor's Symphony II, (Figure 9). Melody in this century
7
is only a part of the integrated whole. Some thematic
material is obtained from medieval plainsong; some is
original with composers; some is inspired from rhythmic in-
terests, simplicity of melodic line, and subtle rhythmic
deviations; and some requires melody, rhythm, and harmonyB
to be complete.
The three elements of rhythm contribute to the di-
versity of contemporary French organ music. Variety in
time signatures is caused by combinations of rhythms as in
Widor's "Minuetto" from Symphony III (Figure 2), elasticity
of the Gregorian chant as in "Toccata I" from Widor's
Symphony V polyrhythms as in "Andante" from Widor's -
h VII and simultaneous rhythms. Syncopation is a pre-
dominant feature regarding metre. The rhythm of a piece
cannot be determined by the way it begins. In the
twentieth century, unusual methods are used for obtaining
unity and coherence. Phrases overlap. Dissonance is fre-
quent. Harshness is very apparent in slow tempos, but
only a flavor of dissonance is noticed in carefully chosen
tempos.
Harmony is important as to modality, tonality, dis-
sonance, modulation, cadence, chromaticism, polytonality,
spacing, and the use of contrapuntal devices within the
harmonic structure. A new harmonic device is the
8Evelyn Merrell, "French Organ Music of the Twentieth
Century," _The Dijason (July, 1941), p. 20,
I
8
accompaniment with embellishments of ecclesiastical modes.
Dissonance is important, not for being discordant, but for
being a movement in a definite direction. In the twentieth
century the dissonant element of music has been of primary
importance, whereas it was of only secondary importance in
the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Dissonance is accomplished in the following ways: by
appoggiaturas, by unprepared suspensions; by sevenths and
ninths becoming pivotal instead of resolving; and by false
relationship, a tendency toward polyphony. This modern
idiom in organ music must be handled most carefully because9
the organ is quite positive.
Chromatic and enharmonic modulations occur frequently.
"From any given tonality, modulation are made principally
to tonality at intervals of the perfect fourth above, the
major second, the major third, and the minor sixth." 10
Diminished sevenths are used in transitory and passing
modulations. In cadences, six-four-three chords are fol-
lowed by variations of the tonic ehord.
Diatonic chromaticism is expressed through a continued
use of tonic-dominant pedal point, through the use of par-
allel fourths and fifths, and through the use of trills,
The American Organist, XXIV (August, 1941), p. 247.10Evelyn Merrell, "French Organ Music of the Twentieth
Century," The Diapason (August, 1941), p. 16,
CHAPTER II
THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF CHARLES MARIE WIDOR
General Background
Charles Marie Widor, the most prominent figure in the
modern French school of organ composition since Cesar
Franck, was born in Lyons, February 24, 1845, and died in
Paris, March 12, 1937. At St. Francist Church, in Lyons,
his father was his first teacher. Going later to Brussels,
he studied compositions with Fetis and organ with Lemmens,
the founder of the present school of organ playing.1 As
a result of the influence of his grandfather, an organ
builder, and his father, an organist, Widor showed litur-
gical traits. It was upon his grandfather's organ that he
was able to form his first impression of the art of organ
playing.2 The occupation of his maternal ancestors, who
were navigators and inventors of balloons, was the source
of his slogan, "Soar Above," which appears upon the title
page of his first eight organ synphonies.3
'Albert Wier, The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Musicand musicians in One Volume (1938) p. 2008.
2"Charles Marie Widor Dies at the Age of 92," TheDiapason, (April 1, 1937), p. 1.
3 Ibid.
9
10
Rank
Widor was a popular professional Frenchman, with a
captivating personality. He had a keen sense of humor, an
unlimited number of anecdotes, and an untiring patience.
He stood by his young colleagues, using his influence for
them when the cause was worthy.4 Widor has been proclaimed
the world's most prominent virtuoso because of his amazing
mastery of the instrument, phenomenal technique, brilliant
original talent for improvisation, and dignified interpre-
tation. He helped save and revice French instrumental music,
which, except for Berliozts work, had been almost inactive
5in the eighteenth century. In music history, Widor was
associated with some of the most worthy institutions and
held many imposing offices. In 1870 he became organist of
St. Sulpice; in 1890 he succeeded Franck as professor of
organ at the Paris Conservatory; and in 1896 he took the
chair of counterpoint and fugue at the same place. Besides
writing musical criticisms for the paper and for "L'Estafette,"
Widor was conductor of the society, "La Concordia," became
a member of the Institute of France in 1910, and was made
secretary of the organization in 1913. Widor's service to
4Maurice Dumesnil, "Charles M. idor, Grand Old Man ofFrench Music," The Etude, LIII (March, 1935), 143-144.
5Edward B. Hill, Modern French Music, p. 41.
the "Academic of Beaux Arts" was that of permanent secretary,
and to the Legion of Hanor, that of chevalier.6
Style in Playing
Clarity in his talent as an executant reveals the
secret of his marvelous power. A listener once described
his impressions of Widor's playing in the following words:
"He seems to pour out a marvelous shower of light, from
the organ loft down onto our heads."7 It was a mystery
to many how his symphonies could be written for one instru-
ment, since the organ had not yet reached its polyphonic
possibilities; but Widor visualized them through the in-
strument of Cavaille-Coll, on which he made his experi-
ments in creating new techniques.8
Widor reduced the organ and built it up again in a
most wonderful way.9 His hands, capable of making broad
stretches., served his prodigious brain in making the strict-
est legato easy. He combined all the manuals by pedal,
which brought on or threw off the couplers. Without
6W. J. Henderson, "Charles M. Widor, Great Organistand His Art," Mentor, XV (December, 1927), 9-10.
7Dumesnil, 2. cit., LIII, pp. 143-144.
Ibid.
9Clarence Eddy, "Great Frenchmen of Organ World in1897 Are Pictured by Eddy," The Diapason (May 1, 1937), p. 14.
12
removing his hands, he could reduce the organ to nearly
nothing and then build it up again without interrupting
the voice flow.
This great composer played with rigid rhythm and strict
phrasing. According to his belief, it was dangerous to
deviate from the once accepted and recognized standards.
He thought that too much improving and modernizing of an
organ was detrimental to the traditional character of its
interpretation.
None has Widor's authority, sense of grandeur, and
mastery, in either playing or improvising. Grand accents,
magnificent legato, great breadth of phrasing, supreme
good taste in coloring--all these made Widor a great vir-
tuoso. Although Widor was elegant, austere, and fiery, yet
all the while he was a complete master of the rhythm.
Widor's music was alive, but not hurried; his staccatos
were exact, but not too short; his chords, though rapid,
were raised with precision; and his pedaling was excellent.
Teacher
As a teacher of composition, Widorts achievements were
great. Widor taught his pupils not only the organ, but
also a conception of what a sane musical life should be.
Widor succeeded Franck as teacher of Louis Vierne and
Charles Tournemire. His theory was: "firm legato, precise
13
articulation of repeated notes, liasion of common tones,
punctuation, respiration, phrasing, and shading."10
Widor is said to have been a harsh, cold teacher. His
aim in teaching was to give precedence to reason over in-
stinct, and to rationalizm over science. He disliked affec-
tations and excess bodily movements that suggested rhythms,
but demanded clear, concise pedaling. The master was ex-
acting about construction, development, transitions, con-
trasts, rhythm distortion of theme, creation of new element
from any germ of the principal theme, and unexpected return
of the subject matter. Every theme must be given out with
dignity and purpose. Widor took keen interest in impart-
ing principles which underly the traditions of French
organ-playing. He demanded absolute adherence to the text,
both in dynamics and in registration.
With utmost exactness, he observed basic principles
of musical interpretations: clearness in change of harmony,
dwelling upon the upper note when returning downward, per-
fect performance of repeated notes, faultless rhythm, treat-
ment of chords, and absolute clarity of delivery. He
thought that one of the most efficient ways to learn to
10Louis Vierne, "Memoirs of Louis Vierne--IHis Lifeand Contacts with Famous Men," translated by Ester Jones,The Diapason (November 1, 1938), p. 19.
1 1 Ylidor Career is Closed," The Ameican inist.XX (April 1, 1937), 128.
14
play was by listening while the composition was being
played. Many prominent organists owe their background of
composition to Widor, one of the outstanding few great
teachers in music history.
Compositions
Although his productions include everything from cham-
ber music to opera, Widor's organ compositions are his
most significant achievements. None of his dramatic works
won permanent success, because his genius, developed in
the church, was too introspective for the objective style
of the stage.
Widorts place in the organ world is not of yesterday
nor of today, but of tomorrow. He brought the Bach
Chorales to the place they now occupy in national schools.
More than others, he helped to raise French organ music
to a plane from which it has not departed. Although his
ten organ sonatas are his masterpieces, he composed some
smaller pieces, too. "In 1934, he published his new Op. 87
of three pieces: Classique d' Hieu,dedicated to Mr.
Rienenschneider; Mystique, dedicated to Charlotte Lockwood;
and Classique d' AuJord'hui, dedicated to Frederick C.
Mayer."12 Several times before 1914, he said he never
12 Ibid.
15
intended to write any more organ symphonies; however,
in 1927 was published his Suite Latin, which ranks with
his best works for organ and shows a tremendous vitality
for a man of eighty-two years.13 A few years ago, he
prepared his set of Bach's 'Memento," six free arrangements
and adaptations from Bacht s works*.14
The Ten Symphonies
Widorts ten symphonies, counted the greatest contri-
bution to organ literature since Bach, are supreme master-
pieces because of the massive scale of the works, as well
as the registrations of the orchestral treatment. These
symphonies have been the only modern influence that many
organists have known, and are the starting point of the
new French school of organ composition.15 They are works
of purity and propriety of style, and are most important
both in scope and influence for the effect they have had on
organ technique, idiom, and registration. These composi-
tions are more like suites than symphonies, with a wide
range of style and mood. The movements contain canons,
fugues, toccatos, marches, scherzo, and adagios.
13"Charles Widor Dies at the Age of 92," The Diaason(April, 1937), pp. 1-2.
14Ibid.
1 5 T. Carl Whitmer, "Widor's Organ Symphonies," TheAmerican Organist, XVII (May 1, 1934), 211-215.
16
Widor wrote his first four symphonies soon after
going to St. Sulpice. This was probably his period of
experimentation. After revising these compositions, he
wrote the fifth and sixth in 1881, and then the more dis-
sonant and more modern seventh and eighth in 1890. In the
last four works, he practically exhausted the rhythmic and
registrational possibilities of the organ.
The organ at St. Sulpice and the first eight symphonies
are so closely connected that a knowledge of each is nec-
essary to understand the other. The first eight eymphonies
demonstrate Widor's own development as a composer, show an
evolution of his own conception of organ, and give endless
variety of touch and registrative combinations. These
masterpieces represent the religious, ecstatic fervor of
the great masters life.
There are forty-eight movements in the numbered sym-
phonies, the average length of each being about six divi-
sions. They require a large instrument for performance.
All show careful craftsmanship and logical development.
The secret in interpretation lies in finding the correct
atmosphere underlying each composition written. French
organs demand registrations that are quite difficult on
American organs. Widor enjoyed making a contrast by a
sudden closing of the swell pedal at suitable points. He
used at least one eight-foot pedal stop in each symphony.
17
The dominant feature is the expression of a simple
truth, classic in conception and romantic in treatment.
<idor reflects Bach in depth of his objective thought,
and Schumann in interwoven treatments. He differs from
Bach in his treatment of polyphony, and from Schumann in
sincerity of elaboration. His art is consummating and
filled with technical curiosities. He knows that melodic,
rhythmic, and harmonic aspects of ideas are affected by
environment. Widorts power was produced by his freedom,
brilliancy, and depth.
A detailed criticism and analysis of the ten symphonies
follow.
Symphony I.--VWidorts First ynphonZ, in C minor, is
composed of seven movements, which number more than any
other one of the ten. Since the last two movements were
added in revision, they show the influence of a later
period.
The p opens with a dignified "Prelude." In the very
first measure, is found the keynote both to Widorts power
and to his mannerism--a great desire to use very large in-16
tervals. This fact is especially true with regard to
intervals written for the pedals. The main theme of the
"Prelude" is a stately, well-phrased figure, which is
16 Ibid.
18
repeated in different voices to form the exposition. It
contains forceful, rhythmic groupings of alternate legato
and staccato notes.
In the original edition the second movement was called
"Allegretto," but in the revised edition the name was
changed to "Allegro." The composer probably felt that a
faster tempo would be a better basis of interpretation.
The Mendelssohnian style is suggested by the "Inter-
mezzo." Its noble theme is very simple in structure. Fre-
quent changes in manuals are made in executing rapid broken-
chord figures, and the theme .in the pedal changes key four
ties, "This movement is extremely tricky, and with even
thm best intentions, the performer frequently loses the
necessary poise."17
In the original edition the fourth movement was
called "Andante," but "Adagio" is a better name when three
beats to the measure instead of nine are used. There is
much contrast of sections on the manuals. The first part
begin; with a skip of an augmented fourth; the second
part is a transposition of the first, up a major third.18
"March Pontificale," through its bigness and buoyancy,
eas ily heads the list of organ marches. It is the most
17Albert Riemenschneider, "Program Notes on Widor'sSymphonies," reprint from the American Organist, copyright(1925) p. 265.
18 Ibid.
19
attractive and most sanely inspired movement of the
symphcny. The point of chief importance is the excellent
use made of rhythmic effects. Heavy registrations for
manuals and pedals are necessary for this sustained, com-
pact work. In the second part, the marked rhythm is off-
set by a counter-rhythm in the left hand, Widor expressed
his idea with freshness and authority.
The sixth movement was probably inserted in the
revised edition to keep the break from the "Imarche" to
the "?inalel" from being so abrupt. This short movement
in Eb minor reveals Widor's mature thought and sincere
feeling. It has a beautiful solo melody, probably flute,
accompanied by sustained chords, played on light string
stops.
The "Finale" consists of a complex double fugue. It
is treated by inverting the section built upon the theme,
by alternating groups of staccato and legato, and by using
pedal-point on the tonic.
Symphony II.--"Praeludium Circulare"t is unique. It
begins in the key of D major, and works chromatically
through keys D, Eb, and E. After modulations there is a
return to the original theme.
In the "Pastorale" are found better rhythmic effects
and a contrast between staccato and legato. A broad har-
monic treatment is used throughout.
20
The two contrasting devices in the "Andante" seem
to strive for supremacy, the one like a choral and the
other like a free phantasy. After the "Adagio" and the
follovingr theme a half step higher appear, the melody
enters in the tenor. At the close is a flute solo over
sustained chords.
"Salve Regina" ia a choral fantasy on a Gregorian
hymn, written in the style of Widor's last period. This
movement shows a common tendency of French cathedral
organS: the effect of play between the Great and the choir
manuals. This is accomplished through the use of a bril-
liant melody in a low voice played on the Great, contrasted
by a serene choral melody in an upper voice played on the
choir.
"Adagio" is a slow movement, played on strings, in-
terspersed by flutes playing the theme.
The "Finale" may be classified with the popular
"Toccata" from the Fifth Symphn. It is a brilliant
work, opening fff on a rhythmic theme, which pervades the
whole movement. Splendid contrast is made through the use
of double thirds and massive chord effects.
Symphony III.--The "Prelude" or "Moderato" is strictly
in four parts and employs in its development two themes
1 9 "Widor, Symphonie No. II," The American Oranist,XXI (February, 1938), 42.
21
which start with an octave skip upward. Episodes are built
upon each theme. Appearing at three different times be-
tween these episodes, in the keep of C, B, and E minor,
is a five-measure plaintive section for a solo reed. See
Figure 1.
Widor marked this registration for the "minuettott
"G, Flute de 8; P, Diapason et Principal; R, Hautbois; Ped.,
Flute 8,n20 is stately, like the old classic form, as shown
in Fig ure 2. The middle section opens with an extended
pedal-note on G, shown in Figure 3, and uses double pedal
in the whole section until the first theme returns in B
Minor. A coda in B major ends the movement.
"Marcia" resembles the "Marche Pontificale" of the
First Symphony in rhythmic effects, slow colorful episodes,
splendid contrasts, and huge climaxes.
"Adagio t" meditative and poised, is written in four
parts. A strict canon exists between soprano and tenor,
with a distance of one measure between them, as shown in
Figure 4.
The "Finale," which really belongs to the third period
of Widor's compositions, is written in the mature style of
the Gothique and the Romane.21 This movement replaced a
20 Charles Marie Widor, t"Minuetto," Syph2nie III,Paris, Hamelle, Editeur (1920), p. 78.
21Albert Riemenschneider, 2F. cit., pp. 265-266.
22
___2,
12 k
D I-
4t! 'r1 1 1
A. -1.-
r _ I _ _ _ _ _ _
3 i 1- 07V 1.-,
-
2Fig. .-}-iVe-rteasure pla4ntive section for solo reede-ppearing between episodes, buil t rPOntheives. (Taken from$"Pre lude, " Symphonle XI, by Ch ar1 Marie Uidor; Paris,Hemelle, Editeur, p,'7, 80, 81.)
4
)
'
jlh 'A 11, to a_[- 1
I -
Alftl *AV4b -S
- - I
Lc qffI i 0
Fig. 2.--ABA classic form. (Taken from "Minuettov"S honie III, by Charles Marie Widor; Paris, Hemelle
on, pp.78, 80, 81.)
44
4
4 (
Ar. IN _j__ L. JF-F AIF
PW
AL,1--m-
'ra , AI I
m
4 .6
I
24
__a AN
~u~mmfmA101101m
AMLI
I I If I2ID oli4AE ^k
Fig. 3.--Extended pedal point. (Taken "rom "Minuetto"ymphonie III, by Charles Marie Widor; laris, Hemelle, Edi
tour, .
-iiii
T
11 I a I I
%W L- _I_
*Ar*ft --- #* F I
glow 771 -1 1 1
25
M F 97
I P
p ~ ~C3
A-d
I-L
Fig. 4.m-Strict canon between soprvnc and tenor with asingle measure between. (Taken from "Adagio," S-mphonie I11by Charles Marie Widor; Paris, Hemelle, Editeur, p.~917
4
a A. k,
-- - ur*
1 - ---
. ' ' ' ' --- .. .
26
fugue, used in the first edition. It is brilliant, has
unusual color effects, and suggests a bold treatment of
the orchestra. Widor's suggested registration is: t"G,
Fonds 4, 8, 16; P. Fonds, 4, 8; R. Fonds at Anches 4, 8,
16; Ped., Fonds 4, 8, 16." 2
SymphonY IV.--Because of its dignity and declamation,
the opening movement of the Fourth hony, "Toccata,"
suggests pre-Bach music, with modern harmonic and rhythmic
treatment. It is written in a style of dignity and declama-
tion. There is a contrast between rhytImic chords and
rapid passage-work.
The "Fugue" is written in a clear, interesting form.
The subject begins in the dominant; the answer, is on the
tonic, as shown in Figure 5. The theme is clear in any
voice in which it appears. The suggested registration is:
"G. P. R., Fonds de 8; Ped., Basses de 8 et de 16."t23
"Andante Cantabile," which was written before Widor
reached his mature style, is unlike the profound slow move-
ments of later periods in that is simple and melodious, be-
cause it is written in chausson style. The main theme con-
sists of the opening sixteen measures, which reappear twice.
22 Charles Marie Widor, "Finale," Symphonie III, Paris,Hamelle, Editeur, p. 93.
23 Charles Marie Widor, "Fugue," Symphonie IV, Paris,
Hamelle, Editeur, p. 6.
27
4IL
1L- k
'1IAk7. , .7 .t- ---- i --
-~- a-L
7T7A
*imks4]
4T~1* --E --EL || ~
- -||.l.ow-
Fig. 5.--Fugue form: subject beginning on the dominantanswer beginning on the tonic. (Taken from "Fugue," S honieI~, by Charles Marie Widor, J. Hamelles, Editeur, p.
IIAjr
]LAP
AbMok
w MKOOMOW
i
'ALAIL
0
I -
i mil 7a 9
28
"Scherzo" is one of the most original, charming, and
delicate pieces ever written. The opening theme states the
character of the whole first part, as seen in Figure 6.
The more peaceful middle section presents an interesting
canon over double pedal, shown in Figure 7. Both movements
are repeated. Much use is made of the right-foot pedal.
In the sustained Adagio of rare beauty, Widor suggested
the "vox humana t" balanced by the solo flute. Much use is
made of contrasting manuals.
The "Finale" is one of the greatest exponents of
modern French organ music. It is marked fff and GPR.24
After the majestic theme is announced, there follow'short
fugal passages, which are repeated several times and lead
into the original theme. After the main division occurs
three times, the movement culminates in a grand climax.
Symphony V.--The Fifth, which is most popular of
1idor ts symphonies, represents a marked departure from the
contrapuntal school of his predecessors and an acceptance
of to the more symphonic style. "Allegro Vivace" was
written in the characteristic theme and variational style.
The first motive is interrupted by a set of episodes,
after which the development continues, with great brilliancy,
to the end.
24Widor, a. ci.,pp. 30-31.
29
2 -w
Fig. 6.--Original, delicate scherzo theme, stating thecharacter of the whole first part of the movement. (Takenfrom "Scherzo," IV, by Charles Marie Widor, J.Ramelle, Editeur, P 4t-
Ad
Awk low-
At
-Jr Ilow
big"Ir
Ask.s
v _je, - -- ---- Tr
a
low
der
+M
IL
-
-- 1, --t- D
40
lowAm -
IRW 46
A f fA W
TO
"PI
ta
~~~1
N
Fig. 7.--Canon over double pedal in middle section.(Taken from "Scherzo," Symhonie J. Hamelle, Editeur,p. 18.)
quo*
PAC
LJF t
VT
31
"Allegro Contabile" is one of Widor's best slow
movements.25 This tuneful melody was written in song
style, accompanied by groups of sixteenth notes, with sus-
tained notes to produce a rich, harmonic background. The
second division contrasts chords on strings with fanciful
figurations on flute. After the third division there is
a repetition of the first.
The "Andantino Quase Allegretto" is unusual, because
it is written in the styles of a scherzo, with interesting
parts for the pedal.
"Adagio" is an excellent slow movement. The four-foot
pedal flute solo soars over the four voices above, which
are played on the manuals, with strings and celeste. See
Figure 8. The pedal is built up impressively near the
close with successive entrances of eight-foot and sixteen-
foot stops.
The famous "Toccata" was written two hundred fifty
years after Bach. This movement is a "moto perpetuo," built
upon a kind of ecclesiastical chant or plain-song, which is
given out on the pedals fortissimo with bold and striking
effect. The whole movement is characterized by an unusual
brilliance in scale figurations, is based upon a there of
25Widor, "Symphonie No. 5," The American _z~anist,
XXII (March, 1939), 78.
32
N1-
715--
?o \~
j S
Fig. 8.--Pedal solo for four foot flute, with fourvoices above, for strings and celeste. (Taken from Ia art TvFifth -- by Charles Marie Widor, Edition Afassio, p.39.)
IL AL
No
en
.99004 1
I
-m- I -M
33
maJor simplicity, and is accompanied by chords of fiery
rhythm.
Symphony VI.--Symphony VI, consisting of five move-
ments, is written in the key of G-minor. The "Allegro,"
the finest single movement of the symphony, represents the
great Widor in his most triumphant mood. It is among the
great organ classics and reveals a wealth of tone-color and
technical device. "Grand-orgue, Positif, Recit, Pedale
Accomplest26 constitute Widor's register markings. Em-
bodied in this composition are majesty and grandeur, ex-
pressed through massive chordal combinations and coupled
with variations. Following the first presentation of the
main theme is a recitative-like passage, shown in Figure 9.
The "Adagio" represents a departure from the tradi-
tional contrapuntal style of the German school. This
change was made possible by mechanical improvements in
the organ itself. Flutes and strings form the background
of the first and last divisions, while the middle sections
yields to a broader registration. Beauty is the result of
combinations of melodic rhythmic, and harmonic forces.
The third movement, the "Intemezzo," is a splendid
example of Widor's originality, expressed in the style of
2 Charles Marie Widor, "Allegro," Symphonie V, Paris,Hamelle, Editeur (1920), p. 2.
34
" 11 - tI 1 1 tI wo- i f m I
[TAw 1
syi~ L
Fig. 9 .-- Recitative-like passage following the firstpresentation of the main theme. (Taken from "Allegro,"8yuphonie VI, by Charles Marie Widor, Paris Edition, p. 3.)
K
.I m I . foloommumm r-T-1-4-I
I V
ILA k'Jov v
L
- .
110
L-!W- I I I I - -
EJITIII
35
a scherzo, with brilliant staccato passages. The middle
section is in canon form. See Figure 10.
Revealing charm and beauty, the "Cantabile" opens with
the melody in the soprano, accompanied by the other three
voiceS. After variations in the middle section, the orig-
inal theme returns.
Closing the symphony, the "Finale" opens with massive,
fortissino chords, followed by surging arpeggios, shown
in Figure 11. Great strength and splendor characterize this
movement.
Symphony VIT.--The Seventh ymhn;-This composition
was written in the key of A minor, is next to the longest
one. The "Moderato" movement opens with a buoyant, rhyth-
mic, dramatic theme, which characterizes the whole move-
ment. In contrast, the second motive is of a serene
nature.
Opening with a broad, resonant movement in six parts,
after a complete statement, there follows a series of
treatments of the "Chorale." The "Chorale" is based
upon the original themes.
All of the "Audante" except the middle part is gay,
quick, and light hearted. The middle section is intense
and is illed with compl-ex polyphony.
27Albert Riemenschneider, a. cit., p. 297.
4-
bh -A&
Tr 1, 11 1 i
.0 TAIIIIIJF-
e-*
..........
Fig. 10.--Canon form in the middle. (Taken from*Intrmeo," S honie VI, by Charles Marie Widor, ParisEdition, p. 24.)
Of I -.1 4NI. .1 - I a... -i I -- -- m - - 0- 1%
f
'ir
- --- ---- I -- AAk---. -. 7
-L
e NNW
doW
AN.
13
...........
-----------
-- .72. ---- Ill --
1.7
10 EE
37
T VW
Sq
Awl
rig. 11.--Treatment of arpeggios, (Taken from "Finale3 -honisV I, by Charles Marie Widor, Paris Edition, p. 374
.4
-og
lin --
TT-,
-a- -77
38
"Allegro Ma Now Troppo" has a short introduction,
followed by a pedal solo. Based on the theme of the
"Chorale" and sustained over surging arpeggio figures, the
melody is the soprano. Masterly rhythmic distribution
portrays strong movements of ocean waves, which finally
subside into a calm. 2 8
"Lento"' is written in church style, with a contrast
between full organ and soft stops.
The "Finalet is to the organ what Wagner" Ride of
the Valkyries is to the orchestra. It is filled with
repetitions of figures, barbaric in energy and savage
in character.
phon VIII.--Finding Inspiration in classical tradi-
tions of the old master, Widor, like Brahms, extends and
develops the form handed down by them. The Eighth Symphony
is orchestral in general scheme, in color, and in rhythm.
It marks a distinct change from the severe, contrapuntal
style of Bach and his successors. The six movements from
the most stupendous, and probably the most difficult, work
ever written for the organ.
tAllegro Risoluto," the opening movement, is introduced
by chords, that have the effect of ringing bells. Both
the main theme and the secondary one are developed before
the climax is reached.
2 8 Ibid.
39
"Moderate Cantabile" has a beautiful melody, accom-
panied by broken chords in sixteenth notes. The contrast-
Ing section which follows leads back to the original
theme, with the melody in a lower voice. "It requires the
best and newest tools mechanically, mentally, and aes-
thetic ally.t29
The "Allegro" movement is mostly in canon style. It
is rapid and complex.
Variations might be ranked with Bach's Passacag;2a.
After the theme is first announced in the pedal, variations
in free chaconne style follow.
The second part of the "Adagio"t is in fugal style and
followed by the original melody.
The "Finale" is in brilliant, round-form. With bar-
baric splendor, it begins with the chords of the Iirst
movement *Here Widor displayed a five rhythmic style.
S ghonie Gothique, . Op. 70.--The Gothique and
Romane Symphonies were written in Widor's third period.
They express his convictions that true organ music must be
inspired by religious melodies and, for that reason, should
be consecrated to the church.30 The Symphonie Gothique
29Ibid.
30Wallace Goodrich, The Organ in France . 8.
40
is Widor's "In Memoriam"--a dark literary elegy,31 which
is filled with contrapuntal design, canon, and fugue.32
Inspired by the organ at Saint Ouen Cathedral, he used
as his basis the beautiful Christmas hymn, Puer Natus Est.
There exists a fine set of variationswhich are really a
free kind of passacaglia that make severe demands upon
33the resources of the player and of the instrument.
In the "Moderato" the arch and flying buttresses of
Gothli architecture are represented by a theme in eighth
notes, and with a chordal theme as countersubject. When
climaxes rise, one sees the whole majestic cathedral.34
There are clear rhythmic basis and much organ tone. "Its
harmonically chromatic character is splendidly self-seeing,
in-seeing, and through-seeing. It is essentially medita-
tive."35 This movement is a transposed-Hypo-Ionian mode,
which produces unusual harmonic effects. Different moods
portray various parts of the church service.
31T. Carl Whitmer, "Widor's Organ Symphonies," TheAmerican Organis, XVII (August, 1934), 362-364.
32 Eddy, Q cit., p. 14.
3 George Grove, DictioQry of Music and Musicians(1938), p. 714.
34T. Carl Whitmer, "Widor's Organ-Symphonies," The
American Organist, XVII (August, 1934)., 362-364.
35Riemenschneider, op. cit., p. 268.
41
Because "Andante Sostenutot" is spiritual, pure,
delicate, and wonderfu.l; one feels an atmosphere of
prayer.
Syponie Romane, _2* 73..--The underlying theme of
the Lymphonie Romane is the Gregorian Easter hymn, aec
Dies, meaning ThisDa3 1 Whitmer was inspired by the
famous Roman church, St. Sernin at Toulouse, The "Moderato,"
which is austere, angular, and impersonal, gives one at-
mosphere of vaulted arches and stained glass windows of the
cathedral. One must understand plain-song to discover
the winding melody of the hymn among the ramblings. Its
dignity suggests improvisation in a church service.
The "Chorale" opens with a harmonized theme. Pedal
stops represent loud pealing of bells. After a freer style
of treatment, there is a return to the bell theme.
"Contilena" which is a lovely movement, is based on
a fragment of the Gregorian chant.
The t'Finale" shows Widor at the height of his achieve-
ment. This magnificent, brilliant fantasy is based upon
the main chorale, Near the end may be heard a peal of
Easter bells, followed by a theme like that of the first
movement.
36hitmer, op. cit., p. 265.
CHAPTER III
THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF LOUIS VIERNE
General Background
Louis Victor Jules Vierne, French organist and composer,
was born in Portiers, France, October 8, 1870, and died in
Paris, France, June 2, 1937, just as he finished playing
his own Triptyque during a recital at the console of Notre
Dame. Having been born with defective vision, he studied
first at the Institute for the Blind in Paris. In 1894,
studying with Franck and Widor at the Paris Conservatory,
he won first prize in organ playing.
After this, Widor kept him by his side in thecapacity of assistant teacher of his organ classes,and soon after, also as his assistant at the grandorgan of St. Sulpice. 2
For a while his sight improved, and he could read ordinary
print and music, with a powerful glass. Soon, however, his
vision failed again, and he was forced to use Braille. Marie
Richepin assisted Vierne, reading music to him and acting as
his amanuensis for composing.
Albert E. Wier, The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Musicand Musicians, p. 1938.
2Paul de Launay, "Vierne s Career Is Closed," The
American Organist, XXII, No. 6 (June, 1937), 229.
42
43
In 1900, in competition for the position as organist
In Notre Dame Cathedral, Vierne won over the other seven3
first-prize organ pupils of the Paris Conservatory. He
held the position of organist of this Cathedral for thirty-
seven years. In 1911, at the death of Guilmant, Vierne
resigned from the Paris Conservatory to accept the posi-
tion of Professor of Organ at Schola Cantorum, which was
founded by d'Indy.
Rank
In the French School Vierne ranks with Widor in im-
portance, in modern composition for organ. He contributed
an insight into the principles of organ playing of the
new School. Vierne was notonly a great musician, but
also a philosopher and a very human and emotional artist.
His place in history is pre-eminent* The French govern-
ment conferred upon him the title of officer of public4
instruction
Style
To Frank, Vierne owed his excellent treatment of the
modern French idiom, his skillful use of canonic imitations,
and. his ingenious combining of themes. To Widor, he owed
his general structure and form..
Vierne was generous, devoted, and eager to share with
Ibid.4
"Louis Vierne Dead; End Comes at Organ," (author notgiven), The Diapason (July 1, 1937), p. lo
44
others his knowledge and love of music. In his own color-'
ful uad pungent way he expressed his rich, human philosophy5
of the art of living. Working in the very shadows of
Wotre Dame, Vierne formulated for himself the aesthetics
of a cathedral organist, and endeavored to adapt himself to
its majestic sound and to his own great religion.
To the high mission which was entrusted to me,I have brought, for want of anything better, all thefidelity and6sincerity of my heart as an artist anda believer.
Because of blindness and because of a great technique,
Vierne was unconscious of anything but his own music. His
complete absorption in his playing was the basic requisite'
for its smoothness. His eyes saw nothing, and his hands
and brain offered no detraction. He played with an in-
stinctive ease, and with smoothness in toe and heel pedaling.
When he played Bach, one knew that Bach was the greatest of
all organ technicians, and that Vierne was worthy to follow
in his footsteps.
Vierne was deeply affected by the same progressive
tendency in modality and harmonization that is character-
istic of what we call "the modern French school." Not
only were his improvisations always scholarly and clever,
but they inclined toward modern harmonies. Most of his
improvisations were short interludes to different parts
of the mass, the melody of the chant often being played
Ibide
45
in appropriate Gregorian harmony. When the organ responss
were longer, there was a more extended improvisation, with
a greater variety of registration. Sometimes a plainsong
melody furnished the basis around which he wove intricate
harmonies.
Often, when one was priviledged to visit the organ
loft with Vierne, as was Virgil Fox, the great composer
would build up his improvisation to the glorious full
organ, using all five manuals, and then gradually reduce
the combinations by changing from one manual to another
rather than by staying on the same manual and throwing off
the couplers as we do on American organs. Ven Fox won-
dered if Vierne's improvisations could be In the sam style
as his compositions, he found proof in a great blaze of
musical fire as he stood by the Notre Dame console and
felt the whole building yield itself to the organ as the7
Master closed the morning service. His theme, a diffi-
cult pedal motive, was built up with manuals to a tremen-
dous structural climax,
There were two opinions on organ design of special
interest today: one is that of t"confounding power with
noise"; the other, "of substituting for excesses of the8
of the nineteenth century, those of the seventeenth."
Virgil Fox, i"Paris in Review," The AmericanOrganist, XIV (May 1, 1933), 266.
Louis Vierne, "Reminiscences of Vierne," translatedby Esther Jones,j T4eDiapason (Sept. 1, 1938), p. 8.
46
Vierne thought there should be a happy medium between these
two tendencies. He believed that specifications of an organ
should include foundation stops, mixtures, and reeds in well-
balanced proportion; that an organist, in order to preside
over a new instrument, should have taste and good judgment;
and that impulsiveness was fine, but reason, finer.
Teacher
Vierne's pupils often gathered around the blind or-
ganist during a service. Then the signal from the high
alter came and Vierne began to play, the Cathedral seemed
nothing but the strength of mighty stone, while the great9
teacher had strength in weakness.
At the Conservatory, Guilmant and Vierne adopted the
following items for plainsong examinations: commentary on
the liturgical chant; accompaniment as in the church, but
in a broader style; and use of melodic ornaments, as em-
bellishments and passing notes, with chords falling only
on the principal notes. After Guilmant died, Vierne and
his pupils, Joseph Bonnet and Marcel Dupre, continued the
new work.
Compositions
Vierne was a successor to Widor in writing in a
secular vein. His death is a great loss for the French
Louis Vierne, "Travel, in the Organ Loft of the Cathe-dral of Notre Dame," House Beautiful, LXXI (March, 1932), 162.
47,
school of organ playing. He most worthily carried on the
traditions of the illustrious masters: Franck, Widor, and
Guilmant; and his works, known throughout the world, will
survive him.
His compositions include mass for chorus and orchestra,
a symphony, a string quarter, sonata for violin and piano,
sonata for 'cello and piano, and smaller instrumental and
vocal works. For the organ Vierne composed six symphonies
and thirty or more short pieces, which are admired and
cultivated by organists the world over. His works are
brilliantly effective and contain much harmonic originality.
In his later symphonies one finds extremely chromatic pas-10
sages, with astringent harmonies bordering on ugly.
Symphonies
Symphony I.--Vierne's First Symphony, Opus 14, shows
a combination of his own strong individuality and the
influence of Franck and Widor. The impersonal rather than
the emotional tends toward an expression of the orchestral
design. This is one of Vierne's most attractive symphonies.
The "Prelude" was intended for the church. Pungent
harmonies were employed with a thrilling use of the pedal
theme near the close. Se Figure 12.
The "Pastorale" is tuneful, but not so original as
some movements. The admirable use of canonic limitation
10Marshall Bidwell, Free Recitals, Forty-Third
Season, p. 38.
48
I_---- F
II,Al
Pig. 12.--Use of pedal theme.. (Taken fr m "1relul: "Fir phone, by louis Vierne, 6Ar, 3Hamele Editon p. o)
IN
p. -
1 4000
49
in the middle section of the "Allegro Vivace" shows the in-
fluence of Franck. See Figure 13.
The "inale," a brilliant, rugged, magnificent Toccata
of fine proportions, employs two themes: the easily dis-
tinguished theme in the pedals, as shown in Figure 14; and
the canonie imitation between pedals and manuals in the
middle section, as shown in Figure 15.
2hnyI.--The first movement, "Allegro," shows
the influence of Franck and Widor. In the first part of
this resolute work one sees Gothic architecture and stained-
glass windows, in the winding second subject one feels
grandeur and picturesqueness, and in the closing section
one knows Vierne's mastery In combining themes.
The "Cantabile" is a sad, plaintive melody against a
background of exquisite chromatic harmonies. After the
development of the theme, which leads up to a thrilling
climax, the piece dies away in celestial loveliness.
The piquant "Scherzo," with its quaint pedal solo,
is one of the most sparkling movements of its kind in all
organ literature. Structurally it is Widor's style, but
harmonically it is Franck's style, especially in his
treatment of the modern French harmonic idioms and skill-
ful combination of themes.
Symphony III.--The opening movement of the Third
Symphony is "Allegro Maestoso." It begins with a state-
ment of the theme in unison, by manuals and pedal, starting
--- Air -don L 0 1 1 t
IL
Aff ~.w Aw
low-
IL
T_- MAL ell- I
W-
dog: A t
ois too tow 4p
moo
WNW--
AML-
'0 000 %ft
40 ABLY
AML
-AWL
ow"
towsop
Ir
J000el rftwq
m 101-1 r
WS -
i 11-M-1 11 NO -M - 31Mlow
Fig. 15.--Canonic limitations influenced by Franck,(Taken from 'Allegro Vivace," pFirst honie, by LouisViorne, Paris, Hamelle Edition,-p.NN"W
50
I InL*s M A I I A I 00.0Iri r.,. -t
51
Ife ro
Fig. 14.--Theme in the pedals. (Taken from "Finale,First ,MLon ,by Louis Vierne, Hamelle Edition4, p. 42)
It L M
~1
AOL
.-- .
. 1f AM L , ., ......-- -. ...
I.11
I
, -, 1 , ow- 1, rRAW, 1!7W. 1 01.A-
r
-- "111-%- 4
-ilk
mm
".:-w - I JL
__
Th
M ma -------- -
owl o44w .. / '40'.)
52
I I --
......................_.............
-. -7-1 11 -
Fig. 15.--Canonic imitation, between pedals and manuals.(Taken from "Finale," First Symphonie, by Louis Vierne,Hamelle Edition, p. 44.7F
fil 7 , I I I 1 1iI 1 I' 11I
ow I vil 400
53
with a powerful fff. See-Figure 16. After a development
of the theme, a sustained legato section follows.
"Cantilene" is characterized by a delicate, doleful
melody which runs throughout the movement, shown in Figure
17. It is exquisitely developed.
In the "Adagio" there is a tragic tenderness which
broods over this entire great, slow movement of rare
emotional depth. It is tinged with bitter sadness, which
marks it off from his other works of this form. See Figure
18.
In the "Finale" Vierne again reaches supreme heights,
as shown in the imperious first theme against rushing
toccata figurations. See Figure 19. The whole movement
is written in an impeccable style and with perfect propor-
tions.
Smaller Works
In his introduction to his 24 Pieces en Style Libre
Pour Orgue _on Harmonium, Livre I and in Livre II, Vierne
says:
The pieces of the present section are calculatedso as to be played during the ordinary duration ofan offertory. They are registered for an harmoniumwith four stops and a half, and for an organ with 2keyboards and pedals of 18 to 20 stops.
Tt is understood that the registration is, here,a general indication of colour, and that this regis-tration can be modified according to the instrumentsat the disposal of the artists.
Two initials close together (G.R.) show that thegreat organ is coupled to the swell; the letter Gmeans thrt the keyboard is separated from the swell.
N. , - , - . - , - , . - --- -. 1, -1 MWAWWAM
Z04
Fig. 16.--Theme in unison by manuals and pedals.(Taken from "Allegro Vaistose," Third 31phonie, by LouisVierne, Durand & Co., p. 1.)
L A --f
j ~I .
''111
~1Fig. 17.--Doleful melody running throughout contilene,
(Taken from "Cantilene," Third Mphonie, by Louis Vierne,Durand & Co., p. 9.)
-~
/. t 1 tk b rr 44;; -3
I-L-Z L.-M -
I "a
55
4
4
4
4
1
Sk f
Fig. 18.--A tender, sad melody characteristic of thewhole movement. (Taken from "Adagio," Third ponie, byLouis Vierne, Durand & Co., p. 20.)
A /Vj
Fig. 19.--'First theme against rushing toccata figura-tions. (Taken from "Finale, Third Symphonie, by LouisVierne, Durand & Co., p. 24.)
INN
40~77%in"-Am l t f q; f
1 e *410
VVOI44 1
4i
-
77,77-%-P QMMIAMA I =.*AmM 6m.OPW ---m I -Imm mmbdft-
-Z.1 OW , , - -Z A I --- I I lpI
10000
ALe oo"*N
I &W
111
_1'.
56
Same meaning for the letters placed near the word Ped.;they show with what keyboard the pedals are coupled.
All the pieces of this collection can be playedentirely with the hands. When they are played on anorgan with pedals, it will be well to divide betweenthe hands the parts under which the pedals will beused.1 1
In the first book referred to by Vierne, "Divertisse-
ment," No. 11, is a scintillating scherzo, intended for an
offertory; however it is not much like a present-day offer-
tory. This composition probably would speed up the taking
of the offering.
In the second volume of 24 Pieces en Sfle Libre,
number twenty-one is the "Carillon." It is one of Vierne's
most unique compositions, based upon a theme played by the
chimes of Chateau de Longport, which was destroyed by the12
Germans during the World War. Vierne dedicated this
composition to his brother, Rene. The theme is stated
first by the pedal solo, then restated, and supported by
massive chords to give the desired effect of the carillons.
Vierne describes the Pieces do Fantaisie as follows:
The Twenty-four Pieces de Fantaisie for the organ,distributed among four books, have been composed for athree manual organ and a pedal board; in opposition tothe Twenty-four Pieces in Free fle, they thereforeinclude an obligatory pedal part. The time which theirexecution demands in the metronomic movements indicatedin the text varies from three to five minutes, Theyare of average difficulty.
11Louis Vierne, 24 Pieces en t Libre, Op. 13
(1914), Flyleaf.12Marshall Bidwell, Free O an Recitals, Forty-Third
Season, p. 126.
- . -, ., - --- - - , 1- t -- . -: Qwsvafl
57
The registration is by means inflexible. It israther an indication for the general coloring. It canbe modified according to the possibilities offered bythe instruments on which they are to be performed. Itis no use saying that the artist must refrain from anyjarring, picturesque, or odd effect unjustified by thecharacter of the music. This is an elementary artisticprinciple in every interpretation aiming at accuracy.
According to the size of the locality and thequickness with which the organ responds to the touch,the movement may be very slightly more or less rapid.
The manuals and pedal are pointed out by G.(great organ), Ch. (choir), Sw. (swell), Ped. (pedal).Two initials juxtaposed indicate the coupling of thetwo keyboards to which they correspond: G. Sw. (greatorgan coupled to swell), Fed. G. (pedal coupled togreet organ), etc.
The registrations indicated by brackets are onlymeant to prepare subsequent passages and in no wayaffect the bars under which they have been placed. Onthe contrary, the indications for the registration with-out brackets coincide with the very moment of theirrealization. 13
Vierne wrote the Pieces de Fantaisie in four suits.
In Premiere Suite are: "Prelude," "Andantino," "Caprice,"
"Intermezzo," "Requiem Aeternam," and "Marche Nuptiale"; in
Deuxieme Suite are: "Lamento," "Sicilienne," "Hymne Au
solely, " "Feux follets," "Claire de lune," and "Toccata ";
in Troijsieme Suite are: "Dedicace," "Impromptu, " "Etoile
du soir," "Fantomes," "Sur le Rhin," "Carillon du Sest-
minster"; in Quatrieme Suite are: "Aubade" "Resignation,"
"Cathedrales," "Naiades," "Gargouilles" et Chimeres," and
"Les Cloches de Hinckley."
"Carillon de Westminster," from the Third Suite, pre-
sents a descriptive toccata based on the Westminster
Louis Vierne, Pieces deFantaisie, Paris-Bruxelles(1926-1927), Flyleaf.
58
Chimes. The theme consists of four phrases of four notes
each. Remv rkable unity is achieved by the use of chime
motifs in the accompaniment.
CHAPTER IT
THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF
CHARLES TOURNEMIRE1
General Background
Charles Arnold Tournemire, French organist and com-
poser, was born in Bordeaux, France, January 22, 1870,
At sixteen when he first heard Cesar Franck play, he
asked, "Is it God playing the organ?"2
Tournemire eventually became a pupil of Cesar Franek
at the Paris Conservatory and won first prize for organ
in 1891. Then he studied with d'Indy. In 1898 Tournemire
succeeded Franck as organist of Sainte Clotilde.
Though his life was one of great industry and produc-
tiveness, he searched for neither fame nor reward. The
luminosity of his Christian devotion may be seen in his4
music. He spoke no English.
Adequate informal tion and material unavailable in theUnited States at the present time.
2Douglas Moore, "Tournemire, Composer Improviser;
Tribute from American Lupil," The Diapason (March 1, 1940),p. 10.
3Albert E. Wier, The Macmillan Encclopedia of Music
and in One Volume (1937 p. 981.4Hugh Giles, "Charles Tournemire," The American
Organist, XXIII (February, 1940), p. 48.
59
I " , I 1 I ! I A .0 - I - - -, 1. 1 - I- - , " 1. 1-111,11-1- . 1 -1 ; ".- -,. - - -, -1 11 1- tjffAWKIKW
60
Like his master, Tournemire was a man of great piety
and gentleness, and his life was essentially a simple one.
He attended services at church, had a class in chamber
music at the Conservatory, had a few pupils who came to
his apartment on the Rue Milne Edwards, and composed.
The composing and the playing of his compositions brought5him the greatest joy of all. Tournemire's life paralleled
that of his teacher, Cesar Franck, in several ways. He
showed great industry, divine fidelity to his art, indif-
ference to recognition, and a religious, mystical temper-
ament.
Rank
The announcement of Tournemire's death on November 4,
1939, left the musical world bereft of one of its greatest6composers and improvisers. He helped to develop composi-
tions that were based on one principal theme or idea. His
assistance has been valuable in developing the technique
of the organ, in execution, and in improvisation,
Tournemire was an exceptional master and poet of the
organ. Not only did he compose reams of organ music, in
addition to an opera and some orchestral music, but he was
musically a direct spiritual descendent of his teachers,
Franck and Widor.
Ibid.6Ibid.
Teacher
Compared with other teachers, Tournemire was casual as
to phrasing and registration. With his youthful enthusiasm
and his delightful sense of humor, he gave meticulous care
to every detail of technique and interpretation. He was a
true friend and patient master to his pupils, and his de-
votion to ideals was an inspiration to them. He was gen-7
erous to their faults.
Tournemire opened a new world of sound and organS
teaching. His compositions reveal that experienced deep
poetic feeling, and that he possessed a vast knowledge of
harmony. His technique was unlimited. Like Franek, he
was only incidentally interested in organ playing. Be-
cause he was happier writing, he was glad to give- up his
teaching and devote all his time to composition.
Style
Tournemire seldom performed works of others. Hence
his playing was that of a great virtuoso only in his own
compositions. He used rich color and constantly changed
his registrations. In 1920 the organ at Sainte-Clotilde
was still just as it was during Franck's lifetime. It
had not been modernized. Since there were a wide variety
of stops and mechanical conveniences for manipulating
7IIbid.
62
them, Tournemire's pupils& assisted him on each wing of the9
console.
Tournemire exhibited great fertility of imagination
as an improvisor. Making use of all the tone color avail-10
able on the Caville-Coll organ, his compositions of this
type demanded marvels of technical skill in performance.
Though modern and complicated, his improvisations were
genuinely inspirational. He used no conventional devices
such as, song forms in composing.11
Tournemire's improvisations, many of which were based
on Gregorian Chant, were unlike the dazzling symphonies of
Dupre. In impressionism and harmony they were similar to
Ravel's later works, because under Widor, Tournemire had
reformed his technique of composition. The music, prima-
rily religious in feeling, belonged in his particular
church, where the great traditions of Franck were still
remembered. This influence undoubtedly was due to his
love and reverence for his former master. Tournemire's
compositions, however, filled with brilliance and con-
temporary idioms, were written thirty years after Franck's12
time. Although he was a great admirer of Bach, his own
Moore,_op cit., p. 10,10William E. Butler, "Charles Tournemire Passes Away
in Paris,tt The Diapa son, (February, 1940), p. 18.11
Butle r, . it. , p. 18,12
Ibid.
63
compositions absorbed his enthusiasms. Dignity was in-
separable from his life as an artist and as a man.
Compositions
Tournemire is best known for his campositions, rather
than his performing ability. These include six symphonies,
four operas, songs, chamber music, choral works, mnd organ
compositions. Many of his works are still in manuscript.
L rge Mustiue, first published in 1928,13 is prob-
ably Tournemire's most familiar composition and the one
for which he is best known. This composition, which was
first introduced into America by the late Lynwood Farnam,
is a suite in the broad sense, and consists of fifty-one
compositions on "offices" for the liturgical year in the
Roman Catholic Church. Each set contains twenty pages or14
more.
L'Orgue is divided into three cycles: Cycle do Noel,
numbers 1-11 Cycle de Paques, number 12-25, and Cycle de
apres la Pentecote, numbers 25-51. Within each cycle is
a series of movements, sectionalized in form and including
the following five divisions: prelude for introit, offer-
tory, elevation, communion, and the terminal piece or
postlude.15
Merrell, if., p.20.14
Giles, o cit, p. 20.15
Ibid.
In the preface of each-of the fifty-one compositions,
Tournemire insisted upon the omission of any rhythmic ac-
cents that would alter the serenity of the music for the
church.
He paraphrased plainsong themes to fom the basis of
the composition and obtained fresh, unique effects in reg.
istration by the use of sixteen-foot and four-foot manual
stops in high registers, and Tournemire placed secondary
emphasis upon syncopation, as shown in L'Orgae, Figure16
20. No specific accent Is dominant because of the sus-
tained soprano, syncopation in the tenor, and irregular
rhythm independent of the remaining voices.
Tournemire's Triple Choral is based on ecclesiastical
themes with meter. Tempos changes occur frequently, as in
Section A ( measures 1-84). All changes in tempo are17
marked for metronome.
His main style of phrasing is through minuteness and
subtlety. Sfl Choral-Poemes on the seven last words is
an example of rapid succession of different time signa-18
tures.
Suite Evocatrice is written in the style of Couperin.
It Is not like the dance form of the seventeenth and
Evelyn Merrell, "French Organ Music of the TwentiethCentury," The Dipson (July, 1941), p. 20.
17Ibid.
18Ibid.
65
N\
--T
=*Ai
I-
_T2(
Fie. 20.--Syncopation in the tenor voice. (Taken frmL Mystique by Charles Tournemire, quoted by EvelynMerrell, The Diapason (July 1, 1941), p. 20.
71
4MO
66
eighteenth centuries, but coonsists of five movements in
sectional form. The sections are marked by means of con--
trast in harmonic development and in effective registra-
tion,
The ""Flure D' Echott is registered thus by Tournemire:
"Clavier d'Echo:Flute 8."1 Contrasting registration is
observed in number V, "Caprice": G. 0; Fonds 8. 4. 2.
Plein Yen; Positif; Fonds 8. 4. 2. Plein Jen (Claviers
ensemble); Recit; Et, plus loin: Cornet, accompagne20parles fonds de 8. 4. du positif; ped.; Fonds 16. 8. 4."
The "Grave" contains a sustained pedal tone through-
out the composition, as shown in Figure 21 in the closing
measures. tJeu Doux et voix Humaine" was written for
manuals only. The rhythmic and harmonic structures are
shown in Figure 22.
Charles Tournemire, "III Flute Dt fcho," SuiteEvocatrice, Paris, Bornemann, Editeur (1938), p. 5.
"V, Caprice," p. 8.
67
Fig. 21.--PFedal point and harmonic structure. (Takenfrom Suite evocatrice 2our Grand Or ue, by Charles Tournemire,Paris, Bornemann, Editeur, p. l.)
~zz~
~\
- ~b.
~j~3
Pig. 22.--Rhythmic and hr~mon1c structure of compos Itnfor manuals only (Taken from Jeu Doux et VO*x Iurne byCh arle s Tournemire.)
471
400
K
rww'Nw- - '. -1 z , -. . 4- , MWWAWA"
.00101owl ow 400
CHAPTER V
THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF MARCEL DUPRE
General Background
Marcel Dupre, French organist and composer, was born
in Rouen, May 3, 1886.1 He comes from a family long con-
nected with organ and church music. Both his maternal
grandfather and his father were organists. At the age of
seven Marcel played from memory on the organ twenty-four
studies by Le Couppey. That was the first exhibition of
his amazing faculty of memorization, 2
Marcel was the most brilliant pupil of his time at
the Paris Conservatory. This unusually gifted hard worker
took the prize at his first competition in Guilmantts
class. He improvised on a liturgical chant a complete
canon and bass at a fourth below, while he treated the two
inner parts in third species counterpoint with an extremely
bold musical figure. The figure he produced appeared to
have been written. He left the counter-subject in its
normal place even for entries of subject and answer in
inner voices. He played a skillful stretto, a free, poetic
improvisation, and a canonic conclusion.
1Albert Wier, Macmillan Encyclopedia of Music andMusicians in One VMe, an o., 9, 97
Marcel Dupre, "French Organist of Supernatural Powers,"Current Opinions, LXXII (Feb., 1922), 210-211.
68
69
tIn 1912, Dupre played a brilliant recital at Salle
Gaveau, and in 1918-19, he gave ten recitals by memory of
all of Bach's works. He won first prize as composer in
Widor's class of 1909. In 1914, he won Grand Prix de Rome
in Widor's compositions.3
Rank
Marcel Dupre has been acclaimed the world's greatest
organist. He is still an international figure in the
realm of organ. Appearing in ten recitals in Paris a few
years ago, he played by memory all of Bach's organ composi-
tions, which number more than two hundred. That performance
was declared to be without precedent, and foreign critics
said that his musical intelligence and temperament were as
astounding as his memory and technique. When Guilmant was
his teacher, he became assistant organist of St. Supice in
Paris, and graduated in 1917, at the age of thirty, to his
present post at Notre Dame. As a composer, he won the Roman
prize when still under thirty.4
IDupre has won world wide recognition. "He received the
acclaim of hundreds of great musicians and of the great
Widor, who at the end of the last recital embraced him in
3Louis Vierne, "Reminiscences of Vierne," translated byEsther Jones, The . ason (April 1), 1939.
4 Marcel Dupre, "French Organist of Supernatural Powers,"Current pinion, LXXII (Feb., 1922), 210-211.
70
public, stating that he thought Bach would have been proud
to do it himself." 5 The inexhaustible fantasy with which
Dupre develops a theme has been the wonder of critics and
public alike. His imagination in polyphonic composition
makes him one of the greatest of all.
When themes were submitted to Dupre for improvisation
at a recital in New York, he took several minutes to study
them and during that time created a symphony composed of
allegro, adagio, scherzo, and finale. The Frenchman wove
the themes into a fabric that was not only clever, but also
appealIng to the emotions. Some considered this feat even
greater than his playirs all of Bach's works by memory. 6
Dupre has appeared many times in the United States
and has always been praised as a most phenomenal genius of
organ. Certain works of Marcel Dupre are far more inspira-
tional than those off ranck. Dupre has already won a place
among the group of most important composers of organ f or all
tilie,
Teacher
IAs a teacher, Dupre has exact standards. He makes
clear, simple, and authoritative demands of his pupils; more-
over, he insists upon clean playing.
he American anist (Jan. 1),, 1940p p. 250.61Marcel Dupr?, "French Organist of Supernormal Powers,"
Current opinion, LXXII (Feb., 1922), 210-211.
71
Careful, exact insistence upon correct form and manner
underly his philosophy of teaching, a philosophy which has
always been marked by an attitude of a diligent research-
scholar. He makes much use of Bach to teach his method of
improvisation.
Dupre's pupils are usually winners of highest honors
in harmony, counterpoint, fugue, and composition. Organists
from many locations who had registered their intentions of
studying with Marcel Dupre at Chicago University during the
surrmer of 1941 were disappointed when they learned that war
conditions would prevent his coming to the United States,
Dupre is progressive. Keenly intelligent, he always
seeks for the better in the new.
Organ students and the world would profit more richly
from the talents of Marcel Dupre if there were available an
English translation of his "Treatise on Improvisation" and
a prompt publication and English translation of his projected
series of textbooks covering the entire field of theory. A
great need has already been met by Dupre's completing an
edition of the organ works of J. S. Bach, based upon Bach's
original edition. This gives not only Dupre'ts excellent
markings of fingering and pedaling, but also instructions
and details of performance, which Dupre copied into his own
books. 2These twelve books, which are obtainable from
7The Diapason (March 1, 1940), p. 25.
72
H. W. Gray and Company, are arranged in a series of Chorales,
Sonatas, and Concertos.
Style
In 1927, Dupre had the organ which was built for
Guilmant's home in Meudon, France. In 1933, this organ was
enlarged from the twenty-eight stops and three manuals; it
was modernized from Barker-lever action to electric action
and housed in a modern console. It has many piston-setting
triggers in the left-jamb groups. Explaining to his pupils
the registration on his organ, Dupre emphasized its import-
ance. Formerly little attention was paid to registration,
but much was given to note-playing. Registration is even
more important than phrasing because through it note-playing
becomes music. Dupre's console is an example for the world
of organ. It shows that a truly great master of this era
demands a console of maximum registrational aids, by which
tones are controlled. "And that makes organ playing."8
No other organist can duplicate Dupre's genuine im-
provisations. He is remarkable for his use of the contra-
puntal forms and for his ingenuity in giving musical effects
to modern technique in organ playing and building. Of the
perfect science of the great master, Louis Vierne has said,
"Dupre knows how to unite brillance of imagination and
8"Marcel Dupre's Console," The American Organist,(July, 1939) XXI, No. 7, 244-2469
-- l- Raw-
73
harmonic richness with entirely modern sensibility."9 Dupre
has crispness and sparkle in his immaculate technique and
clarity of ideas. He plays with perfect registration,
precise synchronization, and modernistic phrasing.
Compositions
One of the most interesting and noteworthy publications
made in the organ world is Dupre's Seventy-Nine Chorales,
based on melodies that Bach used in his Chorale Preludes,
These musical studies come as near being the true funda-
mentals of organ style as it would be possible to get, be-
cause they are like hymn tunes.1 In their simplicity they
consist of one stanza each, which carries out a severe scheme
of rhythm and melody. Interest is achieved through freedom
of counterpoint and harmonization. Although the chorales
are usually only one page in length, they are precise in
fingering and pedaling. Much use is made of French thorough-
ness, and all pieces are workable study material.
Dupre's writing was principally either on choral style,
as in the arrangement of Bachs Seventy-Nine Chorales., or in
the style of improvisation. Ecclesiastical themes, however,
are found in Dupre's Ava Maria Stella, which is composed oftwo versets and a toccata, and which is a variation of an
H. C. Colles, Groves Dictionary of Music and Musicians,p. 115,10 Marcel Dupre's "Seventy-Nine Chorales," New Music Reviewand Church Musle Review, XXXII, No. 272 (Jan.,~T73~3T~~78.
74
old Latin hymn bearing the same name. In the first movement,
mysterious, winding chords provide the background for the
melody; in the second, one hears a work similar to a Bach
chorale; in the finale, the theme is fortissimo in the pedal,
accompanied by rapid passage work on the manuals. Char-
acteristic of Dupre is simplicity of melodic line in which
subtle rhythmic deviations and irregular accents occur in
the development,
Le Chemin do la Croi shows a chordal theme of three
measures (Fig. 23) treated with detailed rhythmic and mel-
odic devices,12 The interval of the minor third recurs
throughout the composition. One is tempted to call this
composition cyclical; however, there is not a single musical
motive, but a single psychological mood of profound solemnity
that recurs.
The three fugues in Trois Preludes et Fugues of Dupre
are very curious compositions both technically and musically.
They are not fugues in the strictest sense, but partly fugal
in form with a fusion of harmony and counterpoint in the
section corresponding to the coda.
The Prelude in G Minor represents a stream which begins
Marshall Bidwell, "Two Versets and Toccata on AveMarie Stella,." Free Organ Recitals 43rd Season (1938),p. 138, -
12Evelyn Merrell, "Organ lusic of the Twentieth Century,"The Diapason (June, 1941), p. 13.
75
ArIts Ivi. I~ -1 39
:i
Fig. 2 3 . Three-measure choral theme, (Taken from Noe 110Le Chemin de la Croix, by Marcel Du r0e--Quoted by EvelynVr l Twrsoni n (July 1 1941 20
-77 syTT-;W-W-
a-MAMgms"O"URNOWN
1777-
rlow
76
quietly in the mountains and grows in its course until it
ends in a great waterfall. An interesting part is in the
introduction of the theme in the middle section of the
Fugue above the fugal episode (page 35, first 24 measures),
and at the end between the two strettos above the fugue
subject in the pedal, (Fig. 24).
Variations sur un Noel is an excellent example of
theme with variations. It is a combination of harmonic
diss onance and contrapuntal devices, combined with expert
workicanship and artistry.13 Dupre's skill in contrapuntal
writing was influenced by organ compositions of the first
half of the eighteenth century. This composition is a set
of variations on a traditional French Noel, in the style of
free Improvisation for which Dupre is justly famous. Fig-
uro 26 gives the first statement of the initial motif of
the thee. It is unlike the old style of variations, in the
treatment that is given, whether it be rhythmic, melodic,
canonic, contrapuntal, or fugal.
Deuxieme Mphonie is an example of Dupre's use of
tonality,, which is not concerned primarily with establishing
a definite key or mode. Our tone is a complex tonality of
the fundaiental note and its overtone. 4 Although the key
131bid.
14Evelyn Merrell, "French Organ Music of the TwentiethCentury," The Diapson (Aug. 1, 1941), p. 13.
77
k 1~j
A~ ! 0 :
- -
A4 k
Fig. 24.--Introductlon of the theme between twostrettos above fugue subject in the pedal. (Taken fror TroIfPreludes et Fues, by rcel Dupre, Ledic Edtlon, p. 41.)
Ekij
r;-I
&
78
Fig. 25.--First statement of theme based on traditionalFrench Noel, developed in the style of free improviations.
(Taken from Variations Sur Un Noel, by Marcel Dupre, LeducEdition, p. 1.)
k
Fig. 26.--Dissonane. (Taken from Deuxieme ymph~onie, byMt'cel Dupre, given by Evelyn MerreUlin the Diapason (August,p. 16.)
-AWL 4 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
map1P
N
f
79
signature is four sharps, in the Preludio, the entire move-
ment is based on the tone of Q# and its dominant, D#. In
contrast to the extreme which Dupre reaches in his disson-
ant treatment of harmony, his style of phrasing is most
regular. Passing modulations, inharmonic relationships,
chromaticism, and frequent use of the augmented second, both
melodically and harmonically, are characteristic of this
movement which ends in C# major. Figure 26 is an example of
Dupre 'sdissonance,15
The second movement, the Intermezzo, begins in the
relative minor of D major, which is a half step above the
concluding tonality of the first movement. Continuity of
tonality is accomplished through the relationship or minor
to the chromatic keynote above.
The Toccata movement, which begins in C# major, includes
much modulation and chromaticism,
In Seven Pieces the fourth composition is Carillon.
DuprA makes effective use of the intervals of fourths and
fifths in this piece,
Trwo Elevations, from Op. 32, one in E major and the other
in G major, belong to a group of Three Elevations, A mystic
feeling which pervades these works expresses itself through
soothing harmonies of the E major and through musical melody
of the G major,
1 5 ,
80
The originality of Variations on Two Themes f or Piano
and OEgan lies in the fact that they are built upon two
themes instead of one, as is generally the case. Instead
of being heard in the same key, each variation is composed
in a new key through modulation. The two themes are
contrasting; the first, played on the piano, is meloncholy;
the second, played on the organ, is tender. Both are played
in various combinations.
Cortege and L has a depth of emotion not foundIin Dupre's other works. The opening measures, in Figure 27,
repre sent a solemn procession, which is followed by a
windin. motive of single repeated notes that suggests short
responsive verses repeated over and over again in the litany
of a liturgical service. A combination of the two themes
later produces a thrilling effect. 1 6
A recent composition of interest is Dupre's Prelude
and Fuguein C Major (Op. 36#3). The Prelude is wrapped in
an atmosphere of airy lightness and leads to an exuberant
and high-spirited fugue built on a buoyant theme which is
developed with great imaginative power. A sustained
crescendo reaches a climax of dazzling brilliancy.
1 6 Marshall Bidwell, "Cortege and Litany," The FreeaRecitals-43rd Season (1938), p. 130.
kaMl
81
nig. 27.--Opening measures portraying solemn procession.(Taken from Corte et Litane, by Marcel Dupre, Leduc Edi-tion, p. 1.)
CHAPTER VI
THE MUSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF JOSEPH BONNET
General Background
Joseph Bonnet, French organist and composer, was born
in Bordeaux, France, March 17, 1884. At the age of fourteen
he was appointed organist of Sainte Michael's in Bordeaux.
Later he studied at the Paris Conservatory under Guilmant.
Tournemire and Vierne were also his teachers. While he was
studying with the latter, he won the prize of competition
at the Conservatory.2 To be satisfied with nothing less
than the best was his noblest ambition.
In 1906, Bonnet was honored with his present position,
that of organist of Sainte Eistache in Paris. After Guilmant's
death in 1911, Bonnet was made organist for the "Societe des
Concerts du Conservatoire." From that time, his fame in-
creased.3 The many concert tours he has made of England
and the Continent were highly successful, After Bonnet's
1 Albert Wier, Macmillan Encypedia of Music and Musiciansin One Volume, p. 2Z7.
2Louis Vierne, "Reminiscences of Louis Vierne," trans-lated by Esther Jones, The Diapason (March 1, 1939), p. 8.
3 "Joseph Bonnet in America," The American 0gnist,XXIII (Oct. 1, 1940), 314.
82
83
debut in America, which was made in 1917 at the great organ
of the College of New York City, he gave many concerts and
lecture-recitals in the United States.
Bonnet has made for Pathe records of ancient French and
Italian organ music, which include Frescabaldis' Toccata Z
1? Elevazione; de Grigny s Martinis and air con Variozione;
Couperints le Giand; and some of Slerambault's and d' Aquin's
works.
Possibly one of the greatest tributes to Bonnet as a
concert artist was paid at the last of his series of five
recitals played during a single week in the Balkans in
Sofia, where enthusiasm rose to such point that Bonnet was
forced to play nineteen encores to satisfy his audience.
Even then the evening was brought to a close by a sympathetic
member of the audience who rushed to the organ, turned off
the motor, and shouted, "It's time to let this man go and
have a snack " The audience goodnaturedly assented.5
Perhaps Bonnet's most monumental series published is
entitled Historical an Recitals, in five volumes. In the
preface, Bonnet has traced the historical development and
the principle contributions of organ compositions produced
by outstanding composers from the forerunners of Bach through
4 "Bonnet Honors Buxthude", The Diapason (July, 1937),p. 1.
p T American32anist, XXIII (Oct. 1, 1940), op. cit.,p. 314.
84
the master of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries,
and to the modern composers*. 6
Rank
Bonnet, well-known virtuoso, is one of the greatest
masters of organ. His record stands as one of the most
formidable in the history of organ music. He is regarded
as one of the greatest interpreters of organ music in this
1century. In spite of his seventeen years? absence from
America, the enthusiasm of his followers in this country
has remained unabated. He is one of the few organ geniuses
of this century.
Bonnet is now the honorary president of the Guilmant
School. He presented diplomas to the graduates in June,
1941. "It was probably Bonnet who more than any other
visitor revived the clean-cut style of technique first ex-
emplified by Alexander Guilmant.' 8
The music of the early French school is better known
because of Bonnetts work. In addition, the most celebrated
foreigners owe him a debt for having defended them well. In
6Joseph Bonnet, Historical organ-Recitals (1929), Preface,p. XI.
7Bonnet, The American Organist, XXIII (April 1, 1940),
p. 119.83Bonet, The American .ranist, XXIII (March 1, 1940),
p. 91.
85
July, 1922, Bonnet became the Chevalier of the Legion of
Honor. 9
Style
Through this superb ense of color and contrast,
Bonnet reveals a richness of organ music and a greatness
of its resources as a form of human expression through the
medium of' sound.10 His music has a Wagnerian robustness
in its approach. Bonnet is noted for playing his omposi-
tions with style, force, authority, and sincerity.
Bonnet was first recognized for his masterly command
of the keyboard and f'or his scholarliness of performance,
He has a keen f eeling f'or the idiosyncrosies of organ
tone.11 He has made a return to polyphony f'or his inter-
pretation of classic organ literature, as shown in some of
his compositions in his Douze Pieces.12
Bonnet serves and honors his art with a conscious
and impersonal coldness, eloquence without emphasis, and
serene grandeur. He revealed these tendencies in recitals
perfo rmed in Italy and Portugal.13
"Louis Vierne Dead; End Comes at Organ," The Diapason,(July 1, 1937), p. 1.
1 "Bonnet Recaptures America," The Diapason, (May 1, 1941),p. 15.
A. Eaglefield Hull, Organ Playing:,Its c eandExpression, pp. 2-7.
Joseph Bonnet, Dix Annees au Service de L OrueFrancais, MCECkXXVII ~ 2=.
Miramon Fitz-Jame s,"Un Voyage de Joseph Bonnet enItalie et au Portugal, rue tI (June, 1939), 33.
86
The condition of Bonnet's native land has left a
deep impression upon him. Although he no longer plays from
memory, his maturity has not dimmed his ability to arouse
enthusiasm by his consummate technical skill, He uses a
crisp, staccato-like playing to emphasize the new art. In
practicing a new composition, he always plays it through
with rhythmic precision to the metronome, because he knows
that when he has mastered the rhythmic precision, he has
also mastered all details and has the piece ready for public
presentation.
The tradition of Guilmant has been preserved through
the following characteristics of Bonnet's playing: grandeur,
firmness of style, excellent touch, magnificent legato,
authority of rhythm, scrupulous respect of the musical
text, and an unfailing good taste in registration.14
Teacher
Probably Bonnet's best lessons in teaching organ
playing are in his recitals. He expects his pupils to
achieve clean phrasing, technical mastery, good taste, and
rich melody; moreover, his own splendid musicianship and
superb sense of color and contrast are expressed in his
pupils. Bonnet is an exacting, sympathetic, and encouraging
teacher.
14 Louis Vierne, "Reminiscences of Vierne," translatedby Esther Jones, The Diason (March 1, 1939), p. 8,
MUM4.-Aiww a
87
Compositions
Bonnet's fame as an executant far overshadows his work
as a composer, for his compositions are neither profound
nor particularly modern, but they have a quality that make
for popularity. His principal compositions include Variations
de Concert Op. 1, Ae Marie for choir and organ Op. 2, songs
Op. 4, Douze Pieces pour Grand Orgue Op. 7, Pater Noster for
tenor and organ Op. 8, Concerto for organ and orchestra
Op. 9, and Douze Pieces pour Grand Or Op. 10.
Bonnet's Variations deConcert begins with a brilliant
introduction, which leads to the theme itself. See Figure 28.
Four variations follow: first, with the melody in the soprano
Iarmonized with the other upper voices, and an accompaniment
by a staccato bass figure, shown in Figure 29; second, with
the theme in the pedal, as shown in Figure 30; third, a
chorale-Prelude with the theme in the tenor, illustrated in
Figure 31; and fourth, a brilliant pedal cadenza, occurring
on page 9.
Altogether, Bonnet has written about forty pieces for
organ. Some of the smaller ones have delicate lyrical
effects. This quality may be found in his Ariel, which is a
musical picture of Saakespeare's dainty spirit, Ariel, in
The Tempest. "I come to answer thy best pleasure; fit to
fly, to swim, to dive into the fire, to ride on the curled
88
Fig. 28.--Statement of the theme. ( Taken from Va-jtijnj do Qoncrt, by Jo seph Ionnet, 1Paris, Leduc Editon,p. 2.)
_ _ _ _ .- I I -- a
Fig. 29.--First variation In soprano, harmonized withother upper voices, and accompanied by steccto bass figure.(Taken from Variations d oConcert, by Joseph Bonnet, Paris,Leduc, p. 4.)
AVAIL&
Ar
a Ar I AL 1 Ak IF
ed.
89
3
t L..
I ~ T .1 1 -4-- _________
I -~I ___________________
Fig. 30.--Second variation, with theme in the pedal.(Taken fro Variations do Concert, by Joseph Bonnet, Paris,Ledue edition , p. 5.)
rn.- .
~ zzzRio
IIW
Fig. 31.--Third variation, chorale-prelude with theme Intenor. (Taken from Variations de Concert, by Joseph Bonnet,Paris, Leduc Edition, p. 6.)
0 A777ro- 7 1 rs
I
a 3
W. -I
A
90
clouds; to thy strong bidding, task arial and all his
quality r*15
Elves and Romance Sans Paroles are typical of Bonnet,
They are light, lyrical, and descriptive of prankish char-
acters.16 In Matin Provencal from Poems d' Automne, one
hears the "Cog gaulois" chanting his cheery refrain, ac-
companied by the awakening of a morning in southern France. 7
In the Rhapsodie Catalane, which is included in his
Douze Pieces, Bonnet has used three folk songs of the pic-
turesque Spanish province Catalonia. The registration
given on page 70 for the first one is "Gd Choeurs a tous
les Claviers accouples,"18 After the second one, which is
a Christnas carol of rare charm, there begins on page 76
an extended pedal cadenza.19 The third folk song is the
one sung when the people return victorous from war,
Other interesting compositions included in Douze Pieces
15 arshall Bidwell, Free ranRecitals-43rd Season(19"8), p. 158.
16Ibid. , P. 36.
1 7 "Bonnet, One of the Few Organ Geniuses of His Time,"Thipason (March 1, 1940), p. 9.
1$Joseph Bonnet, ~hapsodie Catalane, Douze Pieces,
Leduc edition, p. 70,
1 9 Ibid,, p. 76.
91
are Laento, which makes extended use of pedal point
throughout the composition, and Toccata, which shows
Bonnetts use of chromaticism in toccata figurations. Fre-
ouen' change of key signature occurs in Nocturne. Modu-
lations are made from G minor through Eb major, back to
G mninor, and finally to G major. The Reverie is built
upon pedal point. In the first section, the theme is
carried in the soprano and accompanied by the inner voices,
harmonized simply. A contrasting middle section of more
complex harmonic structure through the use of chromati-
cism precedes a return of the original section. nde
phoique demonstrates a variety of rhymical patterns
which include triplet and sixteenth note figurations.
There is a change of key signature eight times during the
whole composition and much use is made of pedal point,
which is one of Bonnet's characteristic means of modern
expression*
CHAPTER VII
CONCLUSIONS
The purpose of this study was to discover and to
develop a deeper appreciation of the specific contributions
to modern music that were made by Widor, Vierne, Tournemire,
Dupre, and Bonnet. The writer concludes that through a
comparative analysis of the musical contributions of these
composers this purpose has been achieved. The investiga-
tion and compositional analysis made in this study offer
no pretense of being a complete detailed study in this
field, because sufficient compositions of these modern
French composers are unavailable at the present time.
Since the field has not been exhausted, the serious organ
student will find a further development of this study to
be of interest. A more minute, detailed analysis, chord
by chord or measure by measure, would be of great benefit.
Further investigation might lead to a detailed comparison
of only the harmonic structure. An interesting study
could be made of a comparison of these organists as per-
fovrners. Of great informational and educational value
would be a comparative study of the great consoles of
France, at which Widor, Vierne, and Tournemire presided,
and over which Dupre and Bonnet have command today,
92
The following modern idioms are found in the composi-
tions of each: improvisation, especially on plainsong and
Gregorian chants, greater emphasis upon registration, un-
usual melodic line, irregular rhythms, complex harmonic
structures, dissonance through chromaticism and syncopa-
tion, extended use of pedal point, minute phrasing, and
various thematic materials,
Differences are found in the degree of emphasis with
which the composers have utilized these modern idioms of
express sion, For example, while Dupre places primary em-
phasis upon syncopation in his use of dissonance, it was
of only secondary importance with Tournemire, Each artist
has excelled in some particular phase of his contributions
to modern music. More than any other, Widor brought French
music to its present state through the modern influences of
his symphonies, He combined. the classic with the romantic,
Vierne was also influential in the new French school by
giving an insight into the principle of organ playing, but
his special contribution was that of his great spiritual
influence. Tournemire was significant not for teaching, but
for the development of composition based on one idea or theme,
and for his frequent change of registration. Dupre has been
proclaimed one of the world's greatest organists because of
his great musical intelligence, his profound memory, his
technique, and his powerful improvisations, which were made
possible through his imagination in polyphonic composition.
94
Bonnet is one of the greatest interpreters of organ
music in this century. He is much greater as an executant
than as a performer and through him the early French school
has been better known.
It is the writer's belief that the material contained
in this study will open a new field of exploration for the
serious organ student, that it will afford him a reference
for research in the study of modern French organ music,
and that it will encourage and inspire him in his own
creative endeavors in organ composition.
95
TIHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXdtS THE MIRABEAU B LAMARLIBRARY
Austin, TexasJuly 25, 1941
Miss 'Elizabeth WrightTeachers College, Box 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Piss Wright:
In reply to your letter dated July 19, we wish to reportseveral references to magazine articles on Widor, Vierne,and Dupre. We were unable to locate information on Bonnet,and Tournemire. We do not have any books on any of thesemusicians. We have two books by Charles M. Widor, one asong book for children in French, and the other entitled,Technpque of the modern orchestra, a manual of practicalinstrction. 'We' iiohave an entr ~in our cEaflieFToiHistoire de _Ila musique by Jacques Bonnet. I do not be-lieve, however, that these are books you want.
Following is a list of several magazine articles which Ihope you will find of use:
WIDOR, CHARLES MARIE. Grand old nmn of French music,J. Dunesnil. portrait. Etude, col, 53, p. 143-4,March, 1935.
WIDOR, CHARLES M. Great organist and his art, by W. J.Henderson, Mentor, vol. 15, p. 9-10, Dec. 1927.
WIDOR, CHARLES M. oole Widor, by W4 H. Miller.portrait. Musician, vol, 15, p. 488-556-7, July-Aug., 1910,
DUPRE, MARCEL. French organist of supernormal powersCurrent Opinion, vol. 72, p. 210-211, Feb. b922.
VIERNE, LrUIavel; in the organ loft of thecathedral of Notre Dame. House Beautiful, vol. 71,p. 162, March, 1932.
We have in our library only the last two articles. TheVierne article consists of only a few paragraphs, bat theDupre article is more extensive. We should be able to lendto the librarian of your college library these two items ifyou wish to use tflrm. Just ask the librarian to write usfor them.
Yours very truly,
Mary E, Wynne
96
THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERSIBLEY MUSICAL LIBRARY
EASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSICROCHESTER, NEW YORK
July 14, 1941
Miss 2lizabeth WrightT. C. Box 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
The Sibley Library catalog has nothing under the heading"Organists - France" that vould be of help to you. Theorgan works of the composers you mention are needed herefo r s tudy.
Yours very truly,
Elizabeth H. Smith
Secretary to Miss Duncan
97
THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTONDIVISION OF MUSIC
July 16, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightT. C. Box 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Mis Wright:
Your letter of July 10 has been referred to the Divisionof Music for attention and report.
The Music Division has practically complete sets of thecompositions by Widor, Vierne, Bonnet, Dupre, and Tour-nemire, as well as many books and studies on modern Frenchorgan music. For example, there are 104 cards in our cata-logue listing compositions by Widor alone, 14 cards listingbooks which discuss him, and 33 articles in periodicals,We have every desire to be of service to you, but since somany requests similar to your own are constantly received,we find that we cannot undertake to transcribe such exten-sive lists of materilas without seriously interferring withthe other work of the Division. We feel sure that you willboth appreciate the situation and the fact that, in justiceto others, it is'hardly possible to make exceptions in indi-vidual Instances.
We are enclosing a "Vemorandum" outlining the regulationsgoverning inter-library loans and have checked three par-ticularly pertinent paragraphs. In view of the stated con-ditions, we would like to suggest that you apply to variouslibraries in your vicinity for the major portion of thematerial you will need for your thesis. If it turns outthat some essential items cannot be obtained in Texas, itis possible that we may be able to make them available forinter-library loan upon suitable application from somelVbrary near you.
For the Librarian of Congress,
Sincerely yours,
Harold SpivackeChief, Division of Music
98
TEXAS WESLEYAN COLLEGE FORT VVORTH, TrXAS
July 29, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
After a careful search of our catalog and Reader t s Guideto Periodical Literature, I found that ve have no mate-rial on the composers you are studying except Grove'sDiction of Music and Musicians. I shall be glad tobe of serviTce To in any Way.
Sincerely,
Laura Hightower
Ass ' t Librarian
99
AMERICAN GUILD OF ORGANISTS NEW YORK, N. W.
July 18, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
I can suggest a few possibleas you may vish, as follows:
(1) Mr. W. I. Nevins,School, 12 West 12th Street,
sources of information, such
President Guilmont OrganNew York.
(2) lr. Carleton S. Smith, Musicologist, New YorkLibrary, 42nd St. and 5th Avenue, New York.
(6) Mr. Lewis Zane, Music Research Dept., NationalBroad asting Company, Rockefeller Center, New York.
I feel sure any of these will be glad to answer anyquestions to the best of their ability.
Very sincerely yours,
RALH A. HARRIS,
General Secretary
100
S. SCHIRMER, INC. NEW YORKMUSIC PUBLISHERS PND DEALERS
July 25, 1941
Miss Elizabeth TrightBox 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
We acknowledge receipt of your inquiry, and inform youthat there are no articles in "The Musical Quaterlyt
on the works of the composers mentioned by you.
However, we suggest that you write to "The AmericanOrganist" (39 Kensico St., Richmond, Staten Island,New York); and also to "The Diapason" (1511 KimballBuilding, Xabash Avenue, Chicago, Ill). Thesemagazines may have "back numbers" with articles onthe composers.
Our Baker's "Biographical Dictionary of Musicians"(Q6.00) contains information regarding the livesof these men.
Thank you for writing to us.
Yours very truly,
S. SCHIRMER, INC.
101
THE JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY GREENFIELD, OHIO
August 9, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightT. C. Box 5871,Dent on, Te xa s
Dear Miss Wright
I am sorry that my reply to your letter of July 19th hasbeen delayed. On July 20 1 left Greensfield for a tripthrough the eastern states and have just returned*
Although the Journal has not published anything alongthe line you want, if there is time for further communi-cation I suggest thnt you write to Professor Swen Lekberg,Chairman of the Division of Music, Simpson College,Indianola, Iowa, I am sure that he can tell you where tolook for the material you want.
Cordially yours.
THE JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY
a
102
THE DIAPASON CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
July 31, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightDenton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
In answer to your letter may we say that Miss Merrell'saddress is Box 24, Mills College, California,
In regard to material concerning the French composers,articles have appeared from time to tome in The Diapason,but It would. be -difficult to lay our hands on them at thismoment. The Memoirs of Louis Vierne were translated forThe Diapason and published in a series of articles fromSeptember, 1938, to September, 1939, inclusive. Thesearticles contained a great deal of light on the com-posers of France in the last fifty years. Copies of thethirteen issues containing these articles are still avail-able at 920 a copy,
Very truly yours,
THE DIAPASON
P. S. In view of your interest in organ we feel thatyou will wish to be a regular reader of The Diapason.
103
NITA IKIN WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS
August 3, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightT. C.Box No. 5871Denton, Texas
Dear 4iss Wright:
I want to thank you for your letter of June the 23rd.asking me whom I considered the five greatest Frenchorgan composers since idor,
In my opinion, I would say Widor, Vierne, Tournemire,Dupre and Oliver Messisen are the greatest composers,From the standpoint of their greatness in their con-tributions in the field of organ as concert organists,as well as composers, I would select Joseph Bonnet inpreference to Oliver Messiaen, who is one of the youngergeneration of composers, and in France is considered oneof the greatest. I would choose Messiaen in preferenceto Joseph Bonnet because to me his music is much greater,and is compared and considered so in France where I firstbecame acquainted with his music.
I want to congratulate you upon the subject you havechosen for your Thesis, and I wish you every successwhile you are writing it. Please call on me for anyother help that I may in any way be able to give.
Sincerely,
NITA AKIN
104
CHARLES COURBORN NEW YORK
Aug, 9, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
You have a fine teacher in Nita Akin.
My choice regarding the five French composers would be:
1/ Saint-Saens, who has written wonderful preludes andfuges for organ as well as Rhapsodies. His 3rdSymphony for organ and orchestra is outstanding.
2/ WIdor 3/ Guilmant
4/ Mullet 5/ Dupre or Vierne with Vierneas better choice, Dupre and Bonnet are really in anotherclass as composers.
Sincerely,
Charles Courborn
105
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ROCKEFELLER MEMORIALCHICAGO, ILLINOIS CHAPEL
July 3, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightBox 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
The list of French organists, as to their importance sinceWidor, seen to me to be correctly arranged in the followingorder:
Marcel DupreCharles Marie WidorLouis VierneCharles TournemireJoseph Bonnet
I place Dupre first because he has written music in thelarger forms most successfully. His Preludes and Fuges,Symphonies and other compositions, display a rare talentfor composition. Although they are modern and extremelydifficult to play, the musical form and development ofeach theme is indeed the work of a genius. Perhaps thisgeneration will not be able to comprehend or appreciatehis great works, but eventually I am sure they will finda place along with the great compositions of Bach, Mozart,Handel and Franck.
Best of luck to you on your thesis, and if I can be ofany further help to you, please let me know.
Sincerely yours,
Frederick MarriottOrganist and Carillonneur
106
PALMER CHRISTIAN
DUPRETOURNEMIREMULETDANIEL LESURMA SSIAE,SCHMITT (for one piece
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN
a, "Prelude")
MALEINGREAU (Belgian, of course, but very important)
HURIf (fkr one piece, Communion for the Midnight Mass)
Paul Christian
107
PAUL i. KOCH ASHEVILLE SCHOOL, N. C.
June 24, 1941
Mr dear Miss Wright:
Thank you for your letter of the 19th--and while we allfeel that comparisons of contemporary compositions arenot only difficult but dangerous, I would say (in orderof their importance and innovatin- contributions): WIDOR,LOUIS VIERNE, Charles Tournemire, Marcel Dupre, JosephBonnet-- and of the younger generation, the French or-ganists (and we also) think very highly of OlivierMessiaen. Tournemire and Bonnet (also were two verywarm friends) write with true religious and poetic in-spiration. Dupre, with a magnificent gift for logicand well-balanced form, will, I believe, go down as oneof the representative composers of our generation--then,too, his influence as Professor of Composition has afar-flung contribution. Of Widor and Vierne you know,I'm sure. Best of luck, Miss Wright, in your good work--don't let the summer heat deter you!
Paul W. Koch
108
GUILMANT ORGAN SCHOOL NEW YORK CITY
July 17, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrigatT. C. Box 5871Denton, Texas
My dear Miss Wright:
Thank you for your letter regarding French organists.
Since practically all of the works of the French organcomposers you have mentioned are printed by Foreignpublishers, I am afraid you are going to have a verydifficult time in making your survey, It is practi-cally impossible to get any copies here in New York.I have my own bound copies but I need them for refer-ence and teaching.
It seems to me the only solution to your problem isto find some organist in Texas within reasonable dis-tance'of yourself who has the necessary works for yourstudy. If conditions were normal I would be able tohelp you very easily.
If I can secure one representative composition fromeach composer, would that be enough for your thesis?If you will let me know about this-I may be able tofind at least that amount of music for you. However,you will find that the publishers have raised theprice on most of these pieces.
In the meantime I will look into this and be preparedwhen your answer arrives.
Very cordially
Willard I. NevinsDirector
109
THE MADISON AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH NEW YORK CITY
July 18, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
Articles by Evelyn Merrell on "French Organ Music of the20th Century" in The Dip for June and July, 1941,contain considerable material on Dupre and Tournemire.I am also sending you a copy of Lorgle for December1939, with more on Tournemire and Dufoureq's "LaUtusiqie d'Orgue Francaise au xx Siecle," with some-thing about Vierne and Widor. I have no documents onBonnet,
Please be careful of these and return them to me byfirst-class mail hen you have finished; I would notlikeyto lose them.
Sincerely yours,
SETH BINGHAM
110
HAROLD GLEASONEASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC
ROCHESTER, NEW YORK
Dear Miss Wright:
I am enclosing a list of a few of the modern composers,including French.
The greatest, I would say, are perhaps Widor, Viarne,Tournemire, Roger Ducane (for his Pastorale). Duprain some works.
It is difficult to define what one means by "greatest,"
at least for me.
Sincerely yours,
Harold Gleason
111
HAROLD GLEASON ROCHESTER, NEW YORKEASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC
July 26, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
Since writing you I have come across the enclosed bookwhich may help you. "In memoriam Louis Vierne" DescleedeBourne & Company, Paris.
I don't think Bonnet one of the greatest composers butcertainly the greatest organist, teacher and personality.Did you get my other letter?
Sincerely yours,
Harold Gleason
112
HUGH PORTER NEV YORK CITY99 Claremont Avenue
July 21, 1941
Dear Viss Wright:
In answer to your recent letter, I am sorry to say Ican be of little service. The accepted books likeHarvey Grace's "French Organ Music," and WallaceGoodrich'st "Organ in France" you must know. The tworecent series in The Diapason taken in one case froma master's thesis, and in the other from the writer'sfriendship for Vierne, -these you have undoubtedlyread,
But considering your subject as suggested in yourletter, I would think you would need, chiefly, theorgan compositions of the composers named, in orderto make a thorough study of the works themselves.I think you have set yourself a fine task, but onethat should take a year or two of digging at least.If the time you have left were not so short I mightsend you Purther suggestions as time goes on. Butthat would not help you, would it?
Best wishes for your study.
Sincerely,
Hugh Porter
113
HUGH MCAMIS GREAT NECK, LONGISLAND
July 24, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
In reply to your very kind letter of recent date, Iwould like to assist you in material for your Master'sThesis but I am leaving for my vacation this afternoonafter a very busy summer just off hand I have nothingto give you.
With all good wishes, I am
Most cordially yours,
Hugh McAmis
114
E POWER BIGGS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
July 28, 1941
Dear Miss Wright:
I am afraid I have very little of the French organ musicup here with me for the summer, and cannot help you muchwith your inquiry. No doubt a direct comparison of themusic of the various composers vould be best, for thereare not many articles or books to which you can refer,
Best of LuckI
B. Power Biggs
115
PARVIN TITUS CINCINNATI, OHIO
July 8, 1941
Dear Miss ;right:
In this order, I should consider Widor, Vierne, Dupre,Tournemire and Bonnet, of outstanding importance amongthe TFrnch composers of music for the organ.
With best wishes,
Parvin Titus
116
MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD, OHIO
July 16, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightT. 0. Box 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
I am afraid I can't be of a great deal of help to youon your thesis as it happens that the writers youmentioned are ones that never appealed to me verystrongly; therefore, my acquaintance with their out-put is distinctly limited. I have an Idea that youalready know more about them than I do.
Yours very truly,
Joseph W. ClockeyDean of School of Fine Arts
117
UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY NEW YORK, CITYCLARENCE DICKINSON
July 21, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightBox 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
It is difficult to understand from your letter justwhat sort of material you are going to need for yourthesis. You have undertaken a terrifically big sub-ject and I really do not know just what to send you,My first suggestion is to have you look over thethesis which we have done here in the library writtenby our students who have taken their Master's degreein Sacred Music. I think you would get a very com-prehensive idea of just what you would want. Do youfeel that you could come to New York sometime perhaps?It would be much more satisfactory for you.
Sincerely,
Clarence Dickinson
118
YON MUSIC STUDIOS CARNEGIE HALL, NEW YORK
August 8, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightT C Box 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
I am very sorry that I cannot comply with your veryelaborate request as I am not in good health and Ihad to give up part of my vacation because I amswamped with work.
I am sorry that I cannot oblige you,Best wishes.
Sincerely yours,
Fretio A. Yon
119
BERNARD R. LABERGE, INC. N4W YORK CITY
July 21, 1941
Miss Elizabeth Wright,T. C. Box 5871Dent on, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
Your letter at hand upon my return from a trip to theSouth and in answer I will say that I wish I could beof help to you in regard to the contents of your letter.
Although, I am well acquainted with the works of Widor,Vierne, Bonnet, Dupre and Tournemire, I have not theseworks myself and so am unable to lend them to you. Mywife has some of them but she is at present in New Orleans.On the other hand she needs these works herself for herown work and could not very well dispense with the onesShe has.
I am somewhat at a loss to tell you how to go about gettingthis material, and the additional information you need. Ifyou were in New York it would be easy for you to get allthis at the Public Library (Music Division) but I do notknow how you can do that for Texas. Maybe Mrs. Akin wouldbe able to help you for she has many of these works andknows pretty well about these composers.
I regret that I cannot be of more service to you, but withbest wishes, remain
Very sincerely yours,
BERNARD R. LA BERGE, INC.
Bernard R. La Berge, Pres.
120
BALDIN-W1ALLACE COLLEGE BEREA, OHIOCONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
July 31, 1941
Miss Elizabeth WrightBox 5871Denton, Texas
Dear Miss Wright:
Your letter of July 28 has reached my desk. Your requestseems to me to be a bit vague. Without knowing what yourbackground is on these composers it would be very dift!-cult to write a long thesis for you tryingto explain myreactions concerning them. Should you pass. through Bereaat any time I will be happy to see you and give you anappointment if it is convenient. However, to write any-thing about the compo sers might simply duplicate what youalready have and would be a rather large undertaking.I fear that such an undertaking would take more time thanI could Ave to it on the possibility that it might fityour demands.
Wishing you every success, I am
Very sincerely yours,
Albert RiemenschneiderDirector
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Aubry, Jean, An Introduction to French Organ Music, London,Cecil Palmer and Heyward, 1916.
Bauer, Marion, Twentieth Century Music, New York, G. P. Put-nam's Sons, 1933.
d'Indi, Vincent, Cesar Franck, London, John Lane Co., 1929.
Evans, Edwin, Technics of The Organ, New York, Scribner s,1938.
Ewen, David, Livin Musicians, New York, The H. W. WilsonCo., 1940.
Goetschius, Percy, Masters of' the Symphony, Chicago,Oliver Ditson Co., 1929.
Goodrich, Wallace, The rgn in France, Boston, BostonMusic Co., 1917.
Groves, George, Dictionary of Music and Musicians, thirdedition, New York, MacMillan Co., 1938.
Hager, Charles Downer, p Since 1815, New York, HenryHolt & Co., 1923.
Heymann, Katherine Ruth, The Relation of Ultramodern toArchaic Music, Boston, SmallMaynad and Co., 1921.
Hill, Edward B., Moder French Musj Boston, HoughtonMifflin Co., 1924.
Hull, A. Edglefield, Lg jPlgyin Its echniue andExpression, London, Augener, 1911.
McNaught, W., Modern Music and Musicians, London, NovellaCo., 1930.
Parkhurst, Winthrop and, De Bekker, L. J., Encyclopediaof Music and Musicians, New York, CrownQ, 1J940.
Pratt, Waldo Emerson, The New Encyclopedia of' Music andMusicians, New York, 7 6701llan Co., 1924,
121
122
Thompson, Oscar, editor, The International cycloedia ofMusic and Musicians,_TehW York, Dodd, Mead & Co.
Truette, Everette E., Organ Resistration, Boston, C. W.ThompsonAY Co., 1919.
Wier, Albert, The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Music andMusicians in One Volume, New York, Macmillan Co.,
Williams, C. F. Abdy, The St2or oran Music, New York,Scribner's Sons, 195.
Article s
Bidwell, Marshall, "Free Organ Recitals - Forty-ThirdSeason," Carnegie Institute, p. 136.
Burhman, T. Scott, "Editorial Reflections," The AmericanOraist, XVI (May, 1933), 266.
de Lounay, Paul, "Vierne's Career Is Closed," The Americanrg, XX (June, 1937), 229.
Dumesnil, Maurice, "Charles M. Widor, Grand Old Man ofFrench Music," Etude, LIII (March, 1935), 143-44.
Dupre, Marcel, "Seventy-nine Chorales," New Music RevIewand Church Music Review, XXXII (Jan7F~193), 58.-
Eddy, Clarence, "Great Frenchmen of Organ World in 1897Are Pictured by Eddy," The D~lpason (May 1, 1937),p. 14.
Fitz-James, de Miraniou, "Un Voyage de Joseph Bonnet enItalie et au Portugal," L'Orgue, XI (Juin, 1939),33.
Fox, Virgil, "Paris in Review," The American Organist,XVI (may 1, 1933), 266,
Merrell, Evelyn, "French Organ Music of the TwentiethCentury," The Dipaso (April , 1935), pp. 16-17.
Merrell, Evelyn, "Organ Music of the Twentieth Century,"The DiuEason (June 1, 1941), p. 18,
Merrell, Evelyn, "French Organ Music of the TwentiethCentury," The Diapason (July 1, 1941), p. 20,
123
Moore, Douglas, "Tournemire, Composer, Improviser; TributeFrom American Pupil," The DiapLason (March 1, 1940),p. 10.
Riemenschneider, Albert, "Program Notes on Widor Symphonies,"reprinted from The American Orantst (1925),
Vierne, Louis, "Reminiscences of Louis Vierne, " translatedby Edith Jones, The Dijpason (March 1, 1939), p. 8.
Vierne, Louis, "Reminiscences of Vierne," The Di aS0n(April 1, 1939) p. 19.
Vierne, Louis, "Reminiscences of Vierne," The Diapasontranslated by Esther Jones (Sept. 1, 1939) p.*7
Vierne, Louis, "Memoirs of Louis Vierne; His Life andContacts with Famous People," translated by EstherJones, The Diapason (Nov. 1, 1938), p. 21.
Whitmen, T. Carl, "Widor's Organ Symphonies," The Americanqrganist, XVII (Aug.,, 1934), 362-64.
Whitmen, T. Carl, "Widor's Organ Symphonieso" The AmericanOrgnist, XVII (May, 1934), 211-15.
"An Anonymous Critique," The American Or2nist (Aug, 1941),p. 247,
"Appointment Rouses Great Storm in Paris - Vierne SuccessorNamed," The Diapason (Oct 1, 1937), p. 27.
"BonnetkArrives For Great American Tour,," The Diapason(Oct. 1, 1940), p. 1s
"Bonnet Heard by Throng of Friends at N. Y. Recital,"The Diapason (Nov. 1, 1940), p. 11.
"Bonnet Honors Buxtehude," _The Diapason (July, 1937), p. 1.
"Bonnet, One of the Few Organ Geniuses of His Time," TheDiapason (March 1, 1940), p. 9,
"Bonnet Recaptures America," The Diapason (Nov., 1940) p. 15,
124
"Charles Marie Widor Dies in Paris at the Age of 92,"The Diapason (April 1, 1937), pp. 1-2.
"Joseph Bonnet; Dix Annees on Service de L'OrgueeFrancair," Paris, MC XXXVII, 22.
"Joseph Bonnet in America," The American OrganistXXIII (October 1, 1940), 31.
"Joseph Bonnet," _The American Organist, XXIII (April 1,1940), 119.
"Joseph Bonnet," The Diapason, (March 1, 1940), p. 9.
"Louis Vierne Dead; End Comes at Organ," The Diapason(October 1, 1940), p. 1.
"Marcel Dupre's Console," The American PrUan-it XXI(July, 1938), 244-246 ~
"Marcel Dupre French Organist of Supernormal Powers,"Current Opinion, LXXII (February 1, 1922) 210-211.
"Marcel Dupre Heard by Great Throng in PhiladelphiaChurch," The Diapason (November 1, 1937), p. 26.
"Marce Dupree." The American Organist, (January 1, 1940)
"Marcel Dupre Will Teach at the University of Chicago,"The DiapAson, (November, 1940), p. 11.
"Secritariat temp re des Amis de l'Orgue," LLruXII (December, 1939- March, 1940), 19.
"The Picture Vierne Drew," The Diaason (October 1, 1939)p. 14.
"Throng That Crowds Chicago University Hears Dupre," TheDA (pason(January 1, 1940), p. 7. --
"Travel in the Organ Loft of the Cathedral of Notre Dame,"House Beautiful, LXXI (March, 1932), 162.
"Widor, Symphonie No. II," The American Organist XXI(February, 1938), 42. ~