swim implementation overview - eurocontrol · the system wide information system (swim) concept...

SWIM Implementation Overview

December 10th, 2019

EUROCONTROL, Rue de la Fusée, Brussels

Copyright SESAR Deployment Manager 2

Meeting Agenda

1. Why SWIM

a. What SWIM can do for my Business

2. SWIM Implementation Status

3. Monitoring Exercise

a. What we want to know?

b. How we ask?

c. Consumer Vs Provider

d. Information provider/Consumer

4. Next steps needed?

major Airlines

Airports

ANSPs

5

24

13

The SESAR Deployment Manager is an industrial partnership

of investing stakeholders, working together to coordinate deployment

What is SDM

The Partnership has

been delegated with

this role by EC as a

result of a Call for

Proposals in 2014

Fulfilling its mandate to manage and coordinate the deployment of SESAR, SDM is entrusted to be the Coordinator

of all Implementation Actions dealing with the implementation of Common Projects. Under this role, SDM works to:

Synchronize major

ATM investmentsDefragment and

de-risk deployment

Manage payments,

checks and auditsEnsure effective

information flows

1. Why SWIM

The System Wide Information System (SWIM) concept consists of standards, infrastructure and

governance enabling the management of ATM related information and its exchange between qualified

parties via interoperable services (ICAO Doc.10039).

What can SWIM do for my business

5

SWIM enables seamless information access and interchange between all providers and

users of ATM information and services. It takes information management business

practices from the ICT sector, such as Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and the use of

open standards and web technologies, and it applies them to ATM.

The SOA approach ensures the availability of interoperable, reusable and user-driven

information services. The use of open standards and main-stream web technologies reduces the

costs of interoperability and makes the aviation data market more competitive, allowing users to

choose a provider without a major impact on their systems.

SWIM as an enabler

6

New model for ATM data service provision

• ATM data services

• AIS, MET and CNS services

Recommendation from AAS:

Realise the de-fragmentation of European skies through virtualisation

and the free flow of data among trusted users across borders

Structural capacity

changesDynamic capacity

management

Airspace & Capacity Scalability & Resilience

The Building Blocks

7

Business Strategy

Business RulesBusiness Service Orchestration

Govern

ance

SW

IM

Regis

try

Public

Key

Infra

stru

ctu

re

ServicesInformation

Technical Infrastructure

Physical Network / IT Operations

Busin

ess R

esilie

nce

SW

IM

Conclusions

SWIM as a technology is well known

SWIM itself makes no difference, but is the enabler for a new

aviation business model

SWIM service orchestration is the result of a business analysis

8

2. SWIM Implementation Status

10Copyright SESAR Deployment Manager

2014 CEF

Call

2015 CEF

Call C1

2015 CEF

Call C2

2015 CEF

Call C3

2016 CEF

Call C1

2016 CEF

Call C2

2017 CEF

Call BLD

2017 CEF

Call

Completed IPs AF5: 21

16

11

20

10

17

19

4AF5

97 IPs

Overview on AF5 implementation


Overview on AF5 implementation – Family Focus

66,7%

30,3%

Family 5.1.2 – NewPENS

New Pan-European Network

Service

Family 5.2.1 – Stakeholders Internet

Protocol Compliance

Family 5.2.2 – Stakeholders SWIM

Infrastructure Components

Family 5.2.3 – Stakeholders’ SWIM

PKI and cyber security

42,4%

36,4%

15,2%

6,0%

45,5%

15,2%

24,2%

15,2%

42,4%

36,4%

9,1%

9,1%

3,0%

3,0%

Data collected as of April 2019, further amended during summer on the basis of SCP Consultation Cycles.

Implementation completed

Implementation in progress without CEF support

Implementation planned

Implementation in progress with CEF support (CEF Call 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017)

Chart Key

Implementation not currently planned

All relevant European stakeholders

have GAPs in the AF5 Families


Implementation completed

Implementation in progress without CEF support

Implementation planned

Implementation in progress with CEF support (CEF Call 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017)

Chart Key

Implementation not currently planned

Family 5.3.1 – Upgrade / Implement

Aeronautical Information

Exchange System / Service


Meteorological Information



Cooperative Network Information



Flight Information Exchange

System / Service supported by Yellow Profile


Flight Information Exchange

System / Service supported by Blue Profile

15,2%

42,4%

24,2%

18,2%

6,3% 3,1%

34,3

%

56,3%15,2%

6,1%

36,3%

42,4%

15,2%

27,2%36,4%

21,2%

36,4%

24,2%

18,2%

21,2%

Overview on AF5 implementation – Family Focus

Data collected as of April 2019, further amended during summer on the basis of SCP Consultation Cycles.

All relevant European stakeholders

have GAPs in the AF5 Families

Deployment depends upon the availability of a common SWIM infrastructure, which includes

three elements:


Public Key Infrastructure December 2021

Target Date

SWIM service registry Operational: January 2020

SWIM Governance June 2020

On top of this, you also need your own technical infrastructure

Common Deployment prerequisites

SWIM Infrastructure

The work could start already, with the possibility to adapt it when Public Key Infrastructure, SWIM service Registry

and SWIM Governance will be ready (e.g. NM B2B Services supporting A-CDM)

14

Consumer vs Provider Implementation Deadlines

Implementation Deadlines

Service Providers should complete their services

well in advance in order to give consumers a

chance to timely implement them.

The deadline for the implementation of AF5 is 31st December 2024

3. Monitoring Exercise

16Copyright SESAR Deployment Manager 16Copyright SESAR Deployment Manager

Monitoring Exercise

SWIM is about service-oriented architecture, therefore the

monitoring exercise will focus specifically on implementation

plans for services.


Monitoring Exercise

No

31/12/2024

Start Date Completion Date

ARES Activation

ARES Deactivation

ARES Preactivation

ARES Release

ARES Query

Airspace Usage Plans (AUP, UUP) - ASM Level 1



Aeronautical Information Feature

Aerodrome Map Information

Digital Notams

5.3.1 Upgrade/Implement Aeronautical Information Exchange

System/Service

Once the relevant CEF-funded projects are ended, do you

expect the full implementation of the Family to be complete?

Planned date for the complete implementation of the Family

with or without CEF Funding

Information exchange requirement (as stated in

the PCP)Role Status CEF Call Reasons for the non-applicability

Implementation TimeframeNotes

ARES Activation

ARES Deactivation

ARES Preactivation

ARES Release

ARES Query






Digital Notams


the PCP)Role Status CEF Call

• Provider

• User

• Both

• Implemented

• In progress with CEF

• In progress without CEF

• Planned

• Not Planned

• Not Applicable

• 2014

• 2015

• 2016

• 2017

Excel Template


Monitoring Exercise

Start Date Completion DateReasons for the non-applicability


• Reasons for the non-applicability must be explicitly stated.

N/A is not deemed as sufficient

No

31/12/2024

Start Date Completion Date

ARES Activation

ARES Deactivation

ARES Preactivation

ARES Release

ARES Query






Digital Notams

5.3.1 Upgrade/Implement Aeronautical Information Exchange

System/Service

Once the relevant CEF-funded projects are ended, do you

expect the full implementation of the Family to be complete?

Planned date for the complete implementation of the Family

with or without CEF Funding


the PCP)Role Status CEF Call Reasons for the non-applicability


Excel Template


Technical/1

• More complex integration of legacy systems into new infrastructure than expected

Technical/2

• User requirements definition requires more time than expected

Resourcing

• Staff shortage/inadequate skill profiles

Procurement

• Slow/complex tender procedures, often made intricate by unclear user requirements

Other

• Change of corporate organizational structure affecting project execution and/or change of project team members

• Synchronization of activities between partners for multi partners (stakeholders) projects

AF5 main challenges


• Issues are mainly encountered while deploying SWIM Technical Infrastructure and

Profiles (specifically 5.2.1 Internet Protocol Compliance and 5.2.2 SWIM infrastructure

components) and Aeronautical Information Exchange (namely, Upgrade - Implement

Aeronautical Information Exchange System – Service)

• These are the families with most de/re-scoping or requests for revised action timeframes

• Reasons are mainly related to delays in procurement (i.e. weak requirement setting),

synchronization with other stakeholders/projects and integration of legacy systems

• What does it mean to be a Service Provider / Consumer vs Information Provider /

Consumer

AF5 main challenges

4. Next Steps


Next steps

Are you all ready to go towards providing SWIM services?

Status right now:

Chicken and the egg situation

Few are providing SWIM services at this

point and the time is running out.


CEF Call 2019 – Preparation Roadmap



CEF Call 2019


Main Priority

IOP

Budget

€ 20 mln

Launch

October, 16th

CEF Call 2019

16 October 2019

swim implementation overview - eurocontrol · the system wide information system (swim) concept...

Documents