synthetic biology and the conservation of biodiversity - iica biology and the conservation of...
TRANSCRIPT
Synthetic biology and the conservation of biodiversity
Kent H. Redford March, 2016
First Seminar on Synthetic Biology to Regulatory Decision Takers from Latin
America
I was raised to think that Nature was something obvious and entrancing
Courtesy: P. Coppolillo
It was different from us – the natural world that wasn’t human.
We wanted to conserve it from destruction …
…. by people
Because humans were bad for nature
So to save nature remove humans
Nature would thrive without human interference
Management of nature meant no management
Then the way I understood the world changed dramatically…
Habitat Destruction Invasive Species Climate Change Economic Exploitation
Human Impact is Pervasive
COMMUNITY / ECOSYSTEM
POPULATION/SPECIES
GENES
Affecting all biodiversity Components
Human impact so pervasive that we are now in a new geological epoch
Yellowstone
Berger 2008
Two examples: Moose in Yellowstone NP use roads to avoid bear predation
2. Lyre Birds Sing the song of Chain saws
Biodiversity will need to be managed to be saved.
Human-dependent species – 82% of US Endangered species
http://clas.wayne.edu/dankashian/Disturbance-Ecology-of-Lake-States-Pine-Systems
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/birds/Kirtland/kiwafctsht.html
Kirtland’s Warbler
Active Management Work in Latin America 1. Reintroduction of injured giant anteaters:
Argentina 2. Increasing number of eggs w/ macaws:
Guatemala 3. Captive breeding of endangered frogs:
Panama 4. Raising turtle hatchlings: Peru
New York Aquarium Post- Hurricane Sandy Julie Larsen Mahar
Informed management decisions made more complicated by climate change
In lieu of the simple dichotomy with which I had been raised …
People bad! Nature good!
We found out we live in a hybrid world
Major Lesson: Saving nature requires management
Conservation Action – in the Past
Conservation Action in the Future
What will happen in this novel operating space?
Synthetic Biology
Biology is Technology Rob Carlson
http://www.synthesis.cc/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?blog_id=1&tag=Carlson%20Curves&limit=20
The Changes are/will be fast: Carlson Curves
The changes are/will be across societies: Democratization of Science
(e.g. publiclab.org)
https://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?viz=MAP&q=select+col0+from+1BbV5lAgDKG58zQsSnPrFrgJtF6nbVs7RasPW8so&h=false&lat=45.73165899691809&lng=-87.456805025&z=4&t=1&l=col0&y=3&tmplt=3
LATIN AMERICA Buenos Aires AR http://www.diybioba.org Guanajuato MX https://www.facebook.com/groups/DIYbioMexico/ Sao Paulo BR http://www.syntechbio.com/ Sao Paulo BR https://garoa.net.br/wiki/Biohacking/ Sao Paulo BR http://synbiobrasil.org/
(Do It Yourself Biology)
2013: 214 Undergrad Teams
The Changes are/will Be driven by the younger generation
Genome Editing – CRISPR Technologies
a novel technique of gene editing (silencing, enhancing or changing specific genes)
SPECIES TRAIT TARGETED w/ SYNBIO TECHNOLOGIES Pigs swine flu; fattened w/ less food; miniaturized (pets) suitable for xenotransplants*; resist flu* Chickens produce only females* Dogs more muscles Goats more meat; longer hair Cattle expression of horns; only males*; resist sleeping sickness* Mice sickle-cell anemia; muscular dystrophy; cystic fibrosis; cataracts; receptors that H.I.V. uses to access human cells Mosquitos malaria transmission Diamondback Moths only females Wheat powdery mildew Rice more starch & less methane *In progress
(Harmon 2015 NYT; Specter 2015 New Yorker)
Things are happening across a broad – and rapidly changing front:
Very little consideration in synthetic biology of the issues of importance to conservation or of the impact on the natural world
How will synthetic biology and conservationshape the future of nature?
Save the DateApril 9-11, 2013
April 2013 Clare College Cambridge Univ. U.K.
Three meetings in last 2 years
April 2015 Cavello Pt., California
December 2015 Bellagio, Italy
Potential Conservation Applications of SynBio
Revive and restore extinct species
H. T
hom
pson
. 201
2. N
atur
e 49
0: 2
2
http://delmardustpan.blogspot.com/2010/09/so-goes-passenger-pigeon-so-go-we.html Rare.longnow.org
Restore lost genetic diversity
Tackle persistent threats Fungal Diseases
• Amphibians • Rice/wheat • Juniper • Corals • Bees • Sea turtles • Rattlesnakes
Fisher et al. 2012
Coral resistance to ocean warming - Manipulating genes to enable adaptation
(courtesy: S. Palumbi)
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-palau-coral-reefs-surprisingly-resistant.html
Enhance capacity to restore degraded ecosystems
Land degradation costs an estimated US$40 billion annually worldwide, without taking into account hidden costs of increased fertilizer use, loss of biodiversity and loss of unique landscapes (http://www.fao.org/nr/land/degradation/en/)
Address problems arising from detrimental patterns of human production and consumption
U.S. manufacturers had legally released about 271 million pounds of pharmaceuticals into waterways as of 2009.
http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/05/pharm
aceuticals-in-the-water-supply-is-this-a-threat/
Control invasive species
Rats/mice on islands
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/01/burmese-pythons-invading-the-everglades/
Burmese pythons in the Everglades
http://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/320761/invasive-species-rats-galapagos-islands-photo-galapagos-national-park.jpg
Significant Concerns
Synthetic life will evolve
http://www.economist.com/images/20060902/D3506SB1.jpg
CRISPR-Cas-9 modified animals vs
Animals altered with other Genetically modified technologies
Altering of native genome with itself vs
Altering native genome with genome of other species
Nature’s services will be synthesized.
http://io9.com/in-fifty-years-carbon-fiber-will-be-spun-from-the-trun-1603040049
Private synthetic life meets the public good
BCC 2013
Impact of synbio technologies on rural livelihoods contested
So what might this mean for conservation?
We should envision a new field: “Synthetic biology conservation stewardship” that might engage in:
http
://w
ww
.opb
.org
/art
sand
life/
arti
cle/
mys
teri
ous-
kille
r-w
hite
-nos
e-sy
ndro
me-
thre
aten
s-ba
ts/
White-nosed syndrome and U.S. colonial roosting bats
http
://w
hite
nose
synd
rom
e.or
g/re
sour
ces/
map
Treatment of frogs with “probiotics”
Bletz et al. 2013
Coral resistance to ocean warming - Moving genes to enable adaptation
(courtesy: S. Palumbi)
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-palau-coral-reefs-surprisingly-resistant.html
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28454-gene-editing-saves-life-of-girl-dying-from-leukaemia-in-world-first/
Synthetic biology is inevitable:
A tabletop lab for the consumer market Modify bacterial cells to create medicinal chemicals,
scents and foodstuffs $799 – to decrease soon
IRRI working to transform rice from inefficient C3 photosynthesis to C4 photosynthesis (as in corn, sugarcane, and sorghum). That switch has been made in plants 60 independent times by evolution. Three billion people depend on rice for survival. A change from C3 to C4 would: 1) generate a 50% greater yield, 2) use half the water, 3) need far less fertilizer, 4) greater resilience to climate change?
Big changes coming in Agriculture too
If this happened, how many other things would change?
To respond to such major changes conservation needs to engage with the Synthetic Biology community across the full range of things they are doing that influence the natural world
What will conservation want in a world of synthetic biology?
• Persistence of evolution – autonomous in some form
• More, better managed, “wild” areas and species • An elevated sense of the long-term and of
precaution in interventions and risk management
• A sense of humility in management • Our diverse perspectives consulted and
incorporated • As much of “nature” saved as possible
Frame message with Counterfactuals The difference between what we can observe and what we would have observed had we done conservation differently.
P. Ferraro 2015 Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.
Counterfactuals The difference between what we can observe and what we would have observed had we done conservation differently.
P. Ferraro 2015 Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.
Counterfactual Thinking with Synbio and Conservation
The state of the natural world if we proceeded with ‘business as usual’ compared to The state of the natural world if we used synbio approaches
In the new poll, 71 percent of Americans said that they're excited about the possibility that DNA research could bring major scientific and medical breakthroughs. But 44 percent said they worry that DNA research involves unforeseen dangers. Thirty-three percent of Americans said they were both excited and worried.
Poll Shows We Want Those DNA Breakthroughs But Worry Scientists May
Be 'Playing God
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/02/dna-science-poll-scientists-playing-god_n_4697595.html
Engaging the Public Early and Often …
The advantage of leading with conservation applications: Members of the public show enthusiasm for synthetic biology applications when those applications are developed to address societal, medical, and sustainability needs, whereas engineering biology is seen as a potential concern if this research is done without investigations of its potential risks and long-term implications. Members of the public also support funding for research that leads to applications that actually meet social and sustainability goals. Pauwels (2013) BioScience
Thank you
http://farmwars.info/?p=6726http://naturallysavvy.com/eat/genetically-modified-salmon-approved-by-the-fda
February 16, 2016
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/world/americas/conspiracy-theories-about-zika-spread-along-with-the-virus.html
February 16, 2016
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/11/19/fda-approves-first-genetically-engineered-animal-salmon/76042682/
Public framing of synbio: Two works of fiction ….
Technologists say that the future is already here, it is just unevenly distributed*
* Nature editorial Nature 530: 25 February 2016.
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1422301112
Printing Reefs
Some Neandertal gene variants today can raise the risk of depression, skin lesions, blood clots and other disorders
The phenotypic legacy of admixture between modern humans and Neandertals Simonti, CN et al. 2015 Science 351, 6274, 737-741
Machine-Invertebrate hybrids
( Hybrid Insect Micro-Electro-Mechanical System
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21602661-crowd-funded-project-aims-build-worlds-first-simulated-organism-computer
Building the world’s first simulated organism -- an accurate, open-source, digital clone of the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans
Humans and nature have become co-mingled
Making it hard to know what conservation is about
Unfortunately, current conservation debates are important but limited by being:
circumscribed by the past not informed by the novelty of the emerging future not alert to the perils and possibilities of this future not fit for purpose – our responsibility to the natural world.
Some exciting possibilities are starting to be made public
http://www.foe.org/projects/food-and-technology/synthetic-biology
KnipBio – a new synbio company
Converting methane from natural gas to animal feedstocks – specifically feed for fish aquaculture
https://gust.com/companies/knipbio
Simplifying complex signaling systems in plants allowed the production of the first synthetic signal transduction system, linking the presence of external substances [such as trinitrotoluene (TNT)] to internal responses with only two or three genes; when coupled with computational protein redesign, the result was “computerized”
detection technology in plants. Medford and Prasad. 2014. Science
Sentinel Plants