t-76.4115 project review vihannekset pi phase 11.12.2013

15
T-76.4115 Project Review Vihannekset PI Phase 11.12.2013

Upload: aldous-gilbert

Post on 02-Jan-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

T-76.4115 Project Review

Vihannekset

PI Phase

11.12.2013

T-76.4115 Project review

Agenda Project status (10 min)

goals of the sprints, spent effort, quality, risks, changes

Experiences of work practices and tools (5 min)

Work results (25 min) presenting the results

demo

Comments and questions (10 min) Customer and mentor discuss privately on the

evaluation (10min)

2

T-76.4115 Project review

Introduction to the project Client: Web-veistämö

Project: RFID inventory management system

Track and manage item status

Read tags with a RFID reader

Follow and manage items from a web service

Count items according to a order

Shipment management

Editing item statuses

End-User uses the system in a warehouse or in events like festivals

Project includes testing and selecting the hardware used for the system

RFID readers

RFID tags

Project includes a backend, web frontend and interface from the reader

3

T-76.4115 Project review

4

Physical overview

Internet

Laptop

RFID readerMain DB

Backend server

3G/4G/Wlan network

User (in the event / warehouse /transport) Web interface user

PDABrowser

Web server

RFID Tag

T-76.4115 Project review

5

Organization

T-76.4115 Project review

Status of the goals of the sprints

Only one sprint in the first iteration Sprint goals:

Project planning: OK Set up project controls: OK Study technologies: In progress Select RFID Reader: Not OK Meet with relevant stakeholders: OK Agree on work practices: OK Create good team spirit: OK

6

T-76.4115 Project review

Status of the deliverables of sprints

Project plan OK, but phasing is still inaccurate for the

future Requirements document

OK, all important requirements documented in general level

Internal deliverables Preliminary Architecture plan: In progress,

OK Development guidelines: In progress, OK Technology review: In progress, OK

7

T-76.4115 Project review

Effort spent - total

8

TaskHeikki Honkanen

Antti Holopainen

Alex Hakala

Atte Isopuro

Joel Eeronheimo

Sadi Hossain

Tuure Vanamo

Vesa Eloranta

Ville Toiviainen

Estimated

Realized

All: Technology testing and teaching meetings 9.00 5.50 9.50 9.00 8.00 4.50 7.00 8.50 8.50 90.00 69.50Setting up project management tools 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 4.00

Create system architecture and select technologies. 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 6.50Documenting project plan: SA 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00Developers: RFID technology research 0.50 0.00 0.00 10.45 2.50 1.00 1.50 6.50 3.50 30.00 25.95All: Meetings 11.50 5.50 5.50 7.50 11.50 8.50 6.50 8.50 5.50 90.00 70.50

Study and prototype new technologies and third party components 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 13.00Requirements engineering: Architect 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.50Project management 9.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 10.00 12.00Organizing people 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.75Plan work practices: Pre timetracking 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 2.00Developers: Technology study 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.50 60.00 14.00Requirements engineering: QA 0.00 0.00 11.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 11.50Creating project plan 18.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0.00 20.00 23.75Update the risk log 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 5.00 4.50

Total 59.00 37.50 26.50 27.45 22.00 14.00 23.00 34.50 24.50410.0

0268.4

5

T-76.4115 Project review

9

Estimated vs realized

A l l : T e c h n o lo g y te s t i n g a n d te a c h in g m e e t in g s

C r e a te s y s te m a r c h i te c tu r e a n d s e le c t te c h n o lo g ie s .

De v e lo p e r s : R F ID te c h n o lo g y r e s e a r c h

S tu d y a n d p r o to ty p e n e w te c h n o lo g ie s a n d th i r d p a r ty c o m p o n e n ts

P r o je c t m a n a g e m e n t

P la n w o r k p r a c t i c e s : P r e t im e tr a c k in g

R e q u i r e m e n ts e n g in e e r in g : Q A

U p d a te th e r i s k l o g

69.50

4.00

6.50

5.00

25.95

70.50

13.00

2.50

12.00

3.75

2.00

14.00

11.50

23.75

4.50

268.45

90.00

5.00

20.00

5.00

30.00

90.00

20.00

10.00

10.00

10.00

5.00

60.00

30.00

20.00

5.00

410.00

Total vs estimated

Total Estimated

T-76.4115 Project review

Effort spent - analysis Main time sinks

Meetings (90h team meetings + 90h tech meetings) Tech study for developers (60h) RFID research (26h)

Top 3 estimation faults Requirements engineering: Arcitecht Creating system architecture and seleting

technologies Technology study

10

T-76.4115 Project review

Changes to the project

No relevant changes to the project at this phase

11

T-76.4115 Project review

Risks Top risks

Internal communication problems

Some small delays in communication, the team is working on developing communication 

Effort estimation problems 

Small problems, but effect is still small

Problems with reader

Problems on acquiring the readers, hence couldn’t start development yet 

Equipment platform is hard to work with / Equipment SDK doesn’t provide desired features

Not sure yet since the reader is not chosen 

Insufficient or inadequate testing 

Not realized

12

T-76.4115 Project review

Used work practices Keep

Technology days Learning technologies used in the project Architect was a teacher for the rest of the

group Hands-On exercises

Joint meetings Good team spirit

Enhance Active communication via Flowdock, most of the

people are already following actively Work time reporting

PM needs more visibility to used resources Sprint planning

Try Planning poker for estimating effort Follow up sprint progress with burn down charts

13

T-76.4115 Project review

Results

Most important results

Getting to know the problem domain

Deciding technologies

Seeing RFID in action

Project plant

Requirements document started

14

T-76.4115 Project review

Example: Work practices Git and Python learning session

Over 4 hours of hands-on training on a Sunday

Whole team participated Some were unfamiliar with the

technologies before the event Results were positive, people felt

that they learned new things

15