t argeting s phingosine k inase 1 and a poptosis by m etformin to d ecrease t umor r esistance to a...

23
Targeting Sphingosine Kinase 1 and Apoptosis by Metformin to Decrease Tumor Resistance to Adriamycin By By Dr. Ahmed Mohamed Kabel Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt Pharmacology Department, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, KSA

Upload: belinda-strickland

Post on 19-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Targeting Sphingosine Kinase 1 and Apoptosis by Metformin to Decrease Tumor

Resistance to Adriamycin

ByBy

Dr. Ahmed Mohamed KabelPharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, EgyptPharmacology Department, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, KSA

• Adriamycin (ADR, Doxorubicin) is an anthracycline antibiotic that is frequently

used as a treatment for many types of cancer such as leukemia, lymphoma, breast,

ovarian and lung cancer. • It damages DNA by intercalation into DNA and inhibition of topoisomerase II resulting

in DNA strand breaks.

• The major limiting factor for the use of ADR in cancer therapy is the development of resistance.

• The mechanisms of this resistance may include increased activity of sphingosine kinase-1 (SphK1)

enzyme which inhibits penetration and intercalation of ADR into DNA and significantly

abolishing the anticancer effect of ADR.

• This makes it essential to combine ADR with agents that inhibit these mechanisms to decrease the incidence of resistance of cancer cells to ADR.

• Metformin is an antidiabetic agent that decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, increases its

anaerobic metabolism and improves insulin sensitivity.

• Studies on animal models had demonstrated that metformin prevents tumor development and

inhibits cell proliferation. This effect may be mediated through its regulatory role on the

hormonal, metabolic and immune functions.

• The main molecular target of metformin is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling that

plays a crucial role in the control of cell division and proliferation.

• Moreover, metformin had been shown to improve endothelial function, decrease

inflammatory response, and regulate immune functions which have a major role in the

pathogenesis of cancer.• Also, metformin was proven to inhibit SphK1

activity which was one of the main factors contributing to resistance of cancer cells to

chemotherapy.

So, The aim of this work was to study

the effect of targeting sphingosine kinase 1

and apoptosis by metformin on tumor

resistance to adriamycin using a

transplantable tumor model in mice.

• In this study, we used a model of solid Ehrlich

carcinoma (SEC), where Ehrlich carcinoma cells

(ECCs) were implanted subcutaneously into the

right thigh of the hind limb of mice. A palpable

solid tumor mass (about 100 mm3) was

developed within 10 days.

Ehrlich Ascites CarcinomaUsed for induction of SEC

Ehrlich Ascites CarcinomaUsed for induction of SEC

ControlControlSECSEC

One hundred BALB/C mice were divided into

5 equal groups of twenty mice each as follows:

Group (1): the Control untreated group

Group (2): ECCs were implanted subcutaneously

into the right thigh of the hind limb of mice.

Group (3): Adriamycin was given by intra-tumoral

injection on days 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 after

implantation of ECCs.

Group (4): Metformin was given to mice orally

starting 10 days after implantation of ECCs and

continued for 32 days.

Group (5): Adriamycin and metformin were given

together starting 10 days after implantation of

ECCs and continued for 32 days by the above

regimens.

• Tumor volume was measured on days 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 after implantation of ECCs.

• In the 42nd day after implantation of ECCs, the animals were killed and the tumor was excised and divided into two portions: one for homogenization

and the other for histopathological examination.

• The tumor tissue was homogenized for determination of tissue catalase, glutathione reductase, malondialdehyde, sphingosine kinase 1 activity, caspase 3 activity and tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Effect of different treatments on tumor volume a Significant compared to SEC group (P < 0.05).b Significant compared to SEC+ADR group (P < 0.05).c Significant compared to SEC+Metformin group (P < 0.05).

Effect of different treatments on tumor volume a Significant compared to SEC group (P < 0.05).b Significant compared to SEC+ADR group (P < 0.05).c Significant compared to SEC+Metformin group (P < 0.05).

Effect of different treatments on tissue antioxidant parametersEffect of different treatments on tissue antioxidant parameters

Effect of different treatments on tissue TNF-αEffect of different treatments on tissue TNF-α

Effect of different treatments on tissue caspase 3 activityEffect of different treatments on tissue caspase 3 activity

Effect of different treatments on tissue SphK1 activityEffect of different treatments on tissue SphK1 activity

Effect of different treatments on the apoptotic indexEffect of different treatments on the apoptotic index

H&E stained sections of a) SEC showing sheets of small tumor cells representing cell proliferation surrounding areas of necrosis;

b) ADR group showing focal necrosis with sheets of malignant cells; c) Metformin showing focal necrosis;

d) ADR/metformin combination group showing extensive necrosis.

H&E stained sections of a) SEC showing sheets of small tumor cells representing cell proliferation surrounding areas of necrosis;

b) ADR group showing focal necrosis with sheets of malignant cells; c) Metformin showing focal necrosis;

d) ADR/metformin combination group showing extensive necrosis.

A photomicrograph of a) SEC group showing negative staining for p53; b) ADR group showing positive (+++) p53 expression;

c) Metformin group showing positive (++) p53 expression;d) ADR/metformin group showing positive (++++) p53 expression.

A photomicrograph of a) SEC group showing negative staining for p53; b) ADR group showing positive (+++) p53 expression;

c) Metformin group showing positive (++) p53 expression;d) ADR/metformin group showing positive (++++) p53 expression.

• The combination of ADR and metformin had a better effect than each of these drugs alone against transplantable tumor model in mice.

Conclusions

• This might be due to the combined antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of both drugs

together with their ability to induce apoptosis of cancer cells.

• Moreover, metformin was able to decrease SphK1 enzyme activity which potentiates the

effect and decreases resistance of cancer cells to ADR.

• So, it is recommended to add metformin to

the anti-cancer regimens containing ADR to

decrease resistance of cancer cells to ADR.