t25: persuasive communications: elaboration likelihood model
TRANSCRIPT
COMM2071Media Audiences & Consumer Behaviour
GROUP PRESENTATION
Topic 25Persuasive Communications: Elaboration Likelihood Model
Design an experiment to test the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Petty and
Cacioppo and discuss your findings.
Agenda
Research The hypothesis The experiment Insights The conclusion Q & A
Research
Happy and Mindless, but Sad and Smart? The Impact of Affective States on Analytic Reasoning (Schwarz and Bless, 1991)
Mood as Input: What We Think About How We Feel Determines How We Think (Martin and Stoner, 1996)
The hypothesis
Individuals who are in bad mood are more likely to apply the central route in cognitive tasks as compared to those in an happy mood.
The experiment
Subjects 150 college students - from the same stream- gender ratio should be equal
The experiment
The students will be told that due to time constraints, they will be participating in two experiments:
Experiment 1Study investigating mood induction procedures
Experiment 2A comprehension passage
The experimentManipulating their mood state
Velten Mood Induction Technique (Velten, 1968)
Each group will be given either a happy or sad 60 self-referent statements to read respectively, while trying to experience the mood depicted by each statement.
The experiment
Manipulation check for mood
Students will be asked to complete alternative forms of the Depression Adjective Checklist (Dublin, 1965) immediately preceding and following the mood induction procedure
The experimentDepression Adjective
Checklist
The experiment
Comprehension Passage
The questions will require the subjects to:
• use their inference skills; • do critical thinking; and
• understand the passage
The experimentAssessment
The results will be assessed based on:
a.The happy and sad individuals based on the Depression Adjective Checklist ;
b.The number of correct answers and if the students are able to give an in-depth explanation to show understanding for experiment 2 based on a marking scheme from 1 to 4 ;
c.If there is a direct relation between a & b.
Insights..Mr Danny BoeyLecturer (Social Psychology and Communication)School of Film and Media StudiesNgee Ann Polytechnic
Interview
Insights..Ms Suja ThomasFormer Lecturer at School of Film and Media Studies, Ngee Ann Polytechnic
Ms Helen NgManager, Mental Health EducationAdult Health DivisionHealth Promotion Board
Former Lecturer for Media and Communication in School of Business, Singapore Polytechnic
The conclusionWhile ELM is a good model, it only seems
to work within a certain circumstances which fulfill certain educational or cultural qualities that will allow the two routes of ELM to be distinctly identified.
ELM may need to be refined to one that includes a more multi-faceted view of persuasive communication taking into consideration of other factors such as mood, feelings, experiences, etc.
Thank you!Questions, anyone?