t6 alternatives

6
Monash University Malaysia School of Engineering ENG1061 Engineering Profession Tutorial 6 (Week 6) (1) Submit - Project Brief Report & Invitation for Tender letter (group submission by 5pm today to Mathew’s mail box – Block 5, Level 4) (2) What is Peer-Assessment? (See handout) a. An introduction to Peer-Assessment b. Conduct a peer-assessment on Project Brief Report (3) All Groups: Oral Presentation on Group Dynamics / Project Brief (3% - individual marks) Two students from each group to give an individual oral presentation on past week group activities. This could be either about technical aspects that the group has worked on, OR about how the group is functioning and how they are dealing with problems that may arise (i.e. the dynamics of the group) and can including the work on the Project Brief Report. Others members of group “Acting as Client of the Project” - Conduct a group oral presentation to potential bidders (who are consultants) on the requirements and specifications of the project. a. All members from the group are to present. Each member should present for 2 minutes and the group total presentation time should not be more that 10 minutes. b. Individual marking – 3% (towards Individual Oral Presentation #1. Markings are based on both group presentation and individual presentation. (4) Develop two alternative designs (10%) a. Acting as a bidder (Consultant): You are required to develop two alternative conceptual designs for the project. See Submission Requirements for Alternative Solutions (see attached) Mathew Thomas 1

Upload: vincent-wong

Post on 18-Apr-2017

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: T6 Alternatives

Monash University MalaysiaSchool of Engineering

ENG1061 Engineering Profession

Tutorial 6 (Week 6)

(1) Submit - Project Brief Report & Invitation for Tender letter (group submission by 5pm today to Mathew’s mail box – Block 5, Level 4)

(2) What is Peer-Assessment? (See handout) a. An introduction to Peer-Assessmentb. Conduct a peer-assessment on Project Brief Report

(3) All Groups: Oral Presentation on Group Dynamics / Project Brief (3% - individual marks)

Two students from each group to give an individual oral presentation on past week group activities. This could be either about technical aspects that the group has worked on, OR about how the group is functioning and how they are dealing with problems that may arise (i.e. the dynamics of the group) and can including the work on the Project Brief Report. Others members of group “Acting as Client of the Project” - Conduct a group oral presentation to potential bidders (who are consultants) on the requirements and specifications of the project.

a. All members from the group are to present. Each member should present for 2 minutes and the group total presentation time should not be more that 10 minutes.

b. Individual marking – 3% (towards Individual Oral Presentation #1. Markings are based on both group presentation and individual presentation.

(4) Develop two alternative designs (10%)a. Acting as a bidder (Consultant): You are required to develop two alternative

conceptual designs for the project. See Submission Requirements for Alternative Solutions (see attached)

b. 20 pages maximum for the Two Alternative Design Report.c. Date of Submission: T9 (Week 9 – 22nd /23rd September 2011)

Mathew Thomas 1

Page 2: T6 Alternatives

Monash University MalaysiaSchool of Engineering

ENG1061 Engineering Profession

Submission Requirements for Alternative Solutions

The alternative concept solutions should include sketches/drawings for the proposed areas of interests. Refer back to your original Project Outline where a number of issues were suggested for consideration. The two solutions should have different theme/concept and comply with the client’s requirements.

A description of each solution and how it meets the Project Brief Report will need to be developed. It is important you refer back to your Project Brief Report at this stage. The conceptual designs must reflect energy efficiency, be environmentally friendly and innovative.

For each alternative solution(a) The following sketches (basically to scale, but do not have to be scale drawings) and brief

descriptions are required for each solution:1. A sketch of the building exterior2. Floor plans of buildings – showing all the necessary floors and facilities such as out-

patient service area, Accident & Emergency (A&E) area, diagnostic area, medical centre details, administration offices, meeting rooms, in-patient rooms & related area to house support equipment, toilets, supports services, parking areas, vehicle access for off-loading/loading of goods, dispatch area for handling waste materials, etc.

3. An isometric view (min. one) of the conceptual design of the building showing the main entrance.

(b) The report should also provide the following information1. Description of the concepts of each solution2. Brief description of the proposed type of components (examples below but not

restricted to the following)a. Inside the building – e.g. air-condition systems, refrigeration system for

temperature sensitive products, office equipments, toilets, supports services, seats, chairs, hospital beds, A&E requirements system for handling patients, audio & video security systems, partition, lightings, etc.

b. Outside the building – e.g. parking bays, signage, garden, lightings, etcc. Electricity, water supply, gas supply/medical gas supplies and their sourcesd. Safety systems and safety featurese. Traffic (both internal and external) and parking facilitiesf. Other facilities and amenities

3. Proposed schedule of project work (major construction milestones and timelines)

NOTES:1. Sketches must be neat, clearly labeled, and basically to scale.2. You need enough drawings and descriptions to show the essential differences between

your solutions (e.g. different layout, operations, materials, etc)3. At a later stage, you will be required to develop more details such as components’

costs and their technical specifications for the preferred solution. More details later.

Mathew Thomas 2

Page 3: T6 Alternatives

Monash University MalaysiaSchool of Engineering

ENG1061 Engineering Profession

Marking Scheme for Alternative Solutions

Student names: _________________________ _____________________

Group: _________________________ _____________________

_________________________ _____________________

General - 3 marks Are sketches neat, clearly labeled, and roughly to scale? Are the essential differences between the solutions clear? Is the concept of each solution clear? (i.e. can you tell what the layout / concept of the

overall design looks like?) Are the solutions innovative and related to some theme or concept?

Description of Concepts, Components and their technical specifications – 8 marks Description of the major components, their operations and specifications (e.g. makers and

model numbers, volume, power ratings, consumption, sizes, colours, dimensions, etc) Pictures and catalogues of components if relevant

Layout plans (different set for each alternative solution) – 8 marksShould clearly show the general layout of the major buildings and facilities (roughly to scale).

Isometric sketches (different set for each alternative solution) – 4 marksShould clearly show the following (roughly to scale): Good viewing angle to clearly show the main entrance

Schedule of works (one set for each alternative solution) – 2 mark

Final Mark out of 25 = _____

Mathew Thomas 3