tac12 report back outline:organization cessamag part a building injector control tac 2013 reporting...

38
TAC12 report back Outline: Organization CESSAMag Part A Building Injector Control TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel 1

Upload: louise-crawford

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

TAC12 report back

Outline: OrganizationCESSAMag Part ABuildingInjectorControl

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

2

OrganizationCentral sector serving machine and BL:Not formalized, new structure would need approval of council,

head of central sector to be assignedInformal practiced.

Control/ComputingStaff: One (A.Ismail) employed, one left (Z.Quazi), open positions not yet filledControl and Computing work together despite being in different sectors

New in 2013: Left in 2013Control-engineer: A.Ismail Z.QuaziElectrician: O.KahdarMagnets: M.EbbeniBeam-Dynamics: K.MaukyanPurchasing: M.SalamaBuilding/Safety: A.BasheerMaintenance: I.ZoubiAdministration: R.Ramadan(Nov.13)BL scientist for PX: R.Kaneez (Nov.13)

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

3

CESSMagMagnets designed and design approved (Jun. 2013)Call for bids (Jul. 2013)Opening of Bids (Aug. 2013)Expert Meeting with externals cancelled due to extended of deadlineSelection: Dipole: TESLAQuadrupoles : ELYT + Turkey (coils)

Sextupoles: CERN + Cyprus + Pakistan

Clearance to vacuum chamber increased to > 1 mm

Split dipole: Not foreseen (expect problems due to long structure) Assembling of vacuum chamber solved (see girder design)

Systematic and random Multi-poles studied (later this talk)

Prices allow Power Supplies to be fully done by CERN

Contribution E.Huttel, A.Milanese, J.-P. BurnetTAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

4

Crane:Still no maintenance contract

Specs have to be defined by us

Grounding: (ordered, built up 2014)A bus bar (0.5 X 250 mm Cu): In the Booster ring tunnel

In the Storage ring tunnelAround the experimental HallAdditional ground pits inside the Hall

Donated equipment:Items from free zone moved to SESAMEUnneeded equipment still at SESAME (difficult to get rid off, due to custom)

Hutches from Lure (who knows about it?)

Building

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Solar Panel: No approach

5

MicrotronNo operation since 2013 due to Booster built upNew PS for main magnetTo be done during commissioning:

Emittance Measurement (Quadrupole scan)

Injection Elements:New Power supplies for injection Septum and Kicker

PS (FUG), Switch (SOLEIL)Transformer oil changed and repairedSparks (inside Septum, conditioned to 100 kV)

To come next: PS Booster Extraction Septum (design done)PS Booster Extraction KickerSR Injection SeptumSR Injection Kicker

Injector

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Contribution M.Attal

6

ControlStaff: One in (A.Ismail) , one out (Z.Quazi), looking for two.Cooperation Control with Computing: yes (Regular Meetings)Expert Visit: PLCs installation (expert visit SOLEIL)

CSS installation (expert visit ANKA)LINUX 6: InstalledIntegration (Cooperation) with clients: (PS group (up to programming), RF, VAC)Black Boxes: Repository built up.

Booster-Control successfully built upVacuum-Valves/Safety: PLC EPICS CSSVacuum-Pressure: MOXA EPICS CSSRF: PLC EPICS CSSPS-Current: EPICS CSSPS-Safety: PLC EPICS CSSTiming: VME EPICS CSS

To be done: Data Save-Restore DatabaseAlarm handler Motion Control

See visit

Contribution A.Ismail/I.SalehTAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

7

Radiation Safety:New license for Microtron commissioning from JNRCRadiation-monitors ordered and deliveredPersonal Safety System ordered, installation till Jan.2014Back-up-plan with JNRC?Contribution M.Mansour

Booster Diagnostics:Digital cameras, scopes purchasedYAG screen from ANKA broken

AOB

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

8

Cooling system: Completed and successfully testedContribution F.Makahleh

Vacuum System: No in-kind contribution from PalestineSR vacuum system tenderedSelected supplier FMBContribution F.Makahleh

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Solid State Amplifier:Delivery of all equipment from SOLEIL items on hold by French government Feb 2013Delivery approved Aug 2013

Cavities:Donated cavities from ELETTRA inspected, tendering for new ones done

9TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Girder

6 feeds3 struts used for transverse and longitudinal adjustment3 jacks used for vertical adjustment and clampingAdditional 3 vertical jacks used for clampingTolerances (flatness, positioning): 0.05 mm

10

Girder-Design

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Dipole to be moved out by trolley

Vacuum chamber lifted in from top

11

Which Girder-Tolerances Needed?

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

+/- [mm] Dipoleoptics

QFoptics

SupportSpecs

Shimrange

Shimresolution

GirderSpecs

horizontal 0.5 0.2 0.1? 0.5 0.05 0.05?

vertical 0.1 0.2 0.1? 0.5 0.05 0.05?

When having shims, why small tolerances for the girder?

12

Dipole-Multipole Tolerances

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

B4/B1=0.0002 B5/B1=0.0004 B6/B1=0.0003 B7/B1=0.0007 B8/B1=0.0007

B4/B1=0.0010

General RemarksWhich Dynamic aperture is needed (lifetime, injection)?Which program (OPA, AT, BETA)?Multipole contribution distributed (AT) or at exit/entrance (OPA)?

Selected radius is 20 mm for bend and 24 or QP, SP.B = Σ Bn xn-1, n=1 dipoleLimits in integrated strengths Bn[m-n+2] about the same for DP,QP,SP.TAC 2013 Reporting back

E.Huttel

B8/B1=0.0006B7/B1=0.0006

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

B4/B1=0.0020B4 in center

13

QF Magnetic Multipole Tolerances

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Quadrupole composed from 4 segments.Assembling Error: Causes random 6-, 8-pole components0.1 mm causes 2 10-4 dB/B @ r = 20 mmFinite Size: Causes systematic 12, 20 pole component12 pole mostly corrected by chamfer

Achievable:6,8-pole 12,20-pole

random σ systematicANKA 5 10-4 5 10-4

ALBA: 3 10-4 3 10-4

SOLEIL: 3 10-4 2 10-4

Tolerable: SESAME: dB/B < 20 10-4-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 00

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

x [mm]

B [T

]

Good field region

14

DP,QP Random-Field-Error and Beta-Beat

Dipole dB/B = 1 10-3 orbit dist.: 2 mm

dk/k = 3 10-3 vert.beta beat: 0.6 m

QF dk/k = 3 10-3 horiz.beta beat: 0.4 m vert. beat beat: 0.1 m

QD dk/k = 3 10-3 horiz.beta beat: 0.1 m vert. beat beat: 0.2 m

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

15

QP Multipole Tolerances

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

B10/B2 =0.0100

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

B10/B2 =0.0010

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40X [mm]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y [mm]

B6/B2 =0.0012

Random(per magnet) B4/B2 =0.0100

SystematicRandom

ALBA,IPAC10

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

16

Random Multipole Errors Decapole due to Correctors

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Sextupole

Sextupole + Corrector→ Decapole

B5/B3 =780 10-4

Working point shifted

17

Dipole End Chamfer

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

B'y, 2.5 GeV

s [mm]

norm

alize

d By

or G

[/]

Vertical focusing from edge

∫B’dl/B ρ = 0.401 (1/m)B’(0)l / B ρ = 0.378 (1/m)(∫B’dl- B’(0)l)/ B ρ = 0.023 (1/m)tan(θ )/ρ = 0.034 (1/m)

Opera give less focusing strength than optical model

No face rotation

CERN initial: Less vert. focusing, more sector magnet,made QF obsolete (or changed to QF)

CERN final, LEGO blocks, flexible, ok, Octupole?

(ALBA, ASRS) PreferredTAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

18

Beam Based Alignment Procedure:Select QP close to BPMDo orbit scan through QPModulate QP current (Producing additional kick, when beam not in center)Orbit with no orbit modulation when QP is modulated gives BPM offset

Can the QF used for vertical and horizontal plane?H-kick (0.2 mrad) Offset at QF: 2.0 mm 5% QF-Modulation: orbit change: 0.5 mm V-kick (0.2 mrad) Offset at QF: 1.5 mm 5% QF-Modulation: orbit change: 0.4 mm

10% QD modulation: orbit change 0.1 mm

Conclusion: BBA works with QF in horizontal and vertical planeNo individual PS needed for QD for BBA

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

19

Insertion device and Beta-Beat

SESAME: PD-Beamline

Wiggler-Parameter

Length 2 m

Period 60.5 mm

No. Pols 63

Magnet gap 14 / 10 / (7) mm

Vacuum gap 12 / 8 / (5) mm

Field 1.1 / 1.5 / (1.9) T

Without local correction the PX wiggler will produce a beta-beat of +/- 4 %

Individual QD-PS favored but not necessary

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

20

Power Supply Procurement

Cost of magnet system allows to purchase complete PS-package in framework of CESSMAg

CERN resumes PS package

Change in concept

(Before: QP-PS in series, Purchasing as complete package turn-key from Industry)

Now: QP-PS in series, PSI-Controller, Voltage-source, DCCT; Assembling at CERN

Advantage: Better performance in respect of:

Maintenance

Adjustment of Beta-Beat

Beam-Based Alignment

Integration of Insertion-devices

Cost: More manpower needed for development and assembling

Concept endorsed by Review-Committee (J.F.Bouteille, R.Kunzi, R.Visintini, F.Bouvet)

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

21

Combined/Individual QP-PS and Air Conditioning-Limits

Pro Combined Pro Individual

Less expensive invest & operation Easier to repair (exchange)

More efficient (water) cooling Easier for Beam Based Alignment

Easier to synchronize Beta Beat can be adjusted

Less (cables) heat-load in the tunnel Easier to adjust insertion devices

AC-Limits Combined Individual Revised *)Individual

Tunnel 30 kW 14 kW 44 kW 30 kW

Hall 60 kW 7 kW+RF 21 kW+RF 20 kW+RF

RF: 700 kW AC, 5% eff. into air 35 kW air or Water?

*): 2 QF in series, cable length reduced to 60 m

Conclusion: AC is compatible with Individual powered QF/QDTAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

CERN: a revision of the installed cooling capacity is recommended.SESAME: The capacities of SESAME have to be accepted (cost- limited).

22

Needed stability for Dipole and Quadrupole PS

Booster Storage-Ring-QF

Storage-Ring-QD

Units

Needed Tune Stability .01 .01 .01

Needed stability in k .007 .001 .005 1/m2

Δk/k .005 .0005 .005

Einj/Efinal .025 .32 .32

ΔIinj/Ifinal for QF 130 160 1600 ppm

Defines Tracking stability ( c Iqp-Idp)/Ldp

Defines PS Stability

SR corrector vert.

Beam size .030 mm

Max change .003 mm

Max kick 0.5 mrad

Orbit max kick 5 mm

Kick for .003 mm .000200 mrad

Relative strength .000400

SESAME ALBA SOLEIL

8h stability QP 50 15 10 ppm

8 h stability crr 50 100 20 ppm

Resolution 16 18 18 bit

16 bit - 15 ppm

Needed stability

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

23

SynchronizationBooster 1s 50 ppm step all 50 µs

SR 240 s 50 ppm step all 15 ms

SR Trigger precision: 1ms

Trigger for each step or external start trigger and following internal clock?

Clocks needed to be synchronized if only triggered for start ?

Old Concept:Off-shelf controller : All PS from same provider to warranty synchronization?

New Concept:PSI Controller for all devices: Synchronization warrantied.

More fun with development.

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

PS Controller

EthernetPSI Gate wayPSI controllerDACADCPWMDCCT

EthernetPSI Gate wayPSI controllerPWMDCCT

Commercial PSVoltage source

Final PS built up by CERN/SESAME

Commercial PS Power source

EthernetPS controllerPWMDCCT

Commercial PSCurrent source

32 QF-PS (3 kW) ( 1 magnet in series)16 QD-PS (3 kW) ( 2 magnets in series)1 SF-PS (2 x 3 kW ?) (32 magnets in series)1 SD-PS (4 x 3 kW ?) (32 magnets in series)1 DP-PS (440 kW) (16 magnets in series)

EthernetPSI Gate wayPSI controllerSerial outSerial inPWMDCCT

24Foreseen for DP Foreseen for QP Foreseen for Corr

Commercial PSVoltage source

To be developed by

CERN?SESAME?

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

25

PS-Cabling

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

26

Questions

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

New concept accepted.Individual PS for QF.PSI Controller for all PS.DAC card and off-shelf PS.

DAC development by CERN or SESAME?Responsibility and Supervision by CERNManpower from SESAME in limits of its capacity26 Person months for 1 year?

Two QD in series?

16 bit (one module less) or 18 bit?

Public tender or contracting EEI for dipole PS?

27

Cavities

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Invitation to Bid: Sep. 133 bids received : Nov. 13 (RI, ELETTRA, TOSHIBA)

Specification:Number: 4Frequency: 499.65 MHzShunt Impedance: > 3.3 MΩMax Cavity Voltage: > 650 kVMax Window Power: > 120 kW

HOM-Damping Properties: Wave guide (BESSY) ++Beam-Pipe (KEK/PF) +Temperature (ELETTRA) 0

28

Purchasing Cavities

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Two old ELETTRA cavities (reduced performance) available.Preferred:

Purchasing of 4 new cavities ( ELETTRA, BESSY, KEKII/PF)Invitation to bid: Sep. 2013Opening of Bids: Nov. 2013 (2.2 M$, 2.1 M$, 4.3 M$)

Italy-INFN Contribution 1 M€Initial proposal 2 new ELETTRA cavities

Meeting Trieste Aug 2013, Agreed with INFN:SESAME can decide items to be purchasedMoney should be transferred to SESAMA account

INFN Proposal Oct.2013:Two new ELETTRA cavities for 0.85 M €

29

HOM-Impedances and Stability

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

30

What to do?

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

2 Cavities 3 Cavities 4 Cavities

Energy [GeV] 2.3 2.5 2.5

Uloss-tot [keV] 440 615 615

Overvoltage 2.5 2.5 3

P window [kW] 80 80 80

P cavity [kW] 48 42 34

U cav [kV] 550 520 460

I beam [mA] 140 180 300

31

Comparing Cavities

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Parameter Units BESSY ELETTRA KEKII/PFRshunt MΩ 3.4 3.3 3.5

Q 29000 39000 39000

Umax kV 730 650 700

Pcavmax kW 80 65 70

Pwindowmax kW 120 120 180

R-HOM-Lmax kΩ 11 100000 20

R-HOM-Tmax kΩ/m 54 10000000 80000

Values from E.Weihreter

RF Amplifier

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel 32

Intended : Use 500 MHz solid state amplifier (0.6 kW Module) developed at SOLEIL

Needed: 4 x 80 kW from 4 x 10 x 16 x 0.5 kW

Status: 16 Modules combined and tested by SOLEIL.40 kW tower will be built up by SOLEIL for THOMX (Beginning 2014).

Export of Technology from SOLEIL to SESAME on halt (May 2013)Export approval received (Aug.2013)

Intended: Built up of one 80 kW tower (Demonstrator) by SOLEIL, sold to SESAME.Participation of SESAME.Licensing of 500 MHz technology from SOLEIL to SIGAM-PHI-Electronics?Purchasing of further 3 towers from SIGMA-PHI-Electronics? Cost?

500 MHz 80 kW Solid-State-Amplifier

X 16 X 10 4 x

Syn.Rad. Losses: (200 mA 600 kV) / 4 = 30 kWCavity Losses: (500 kV)2 / (6 MΩ)= 40 kW4 Cavities: 280 kW

0.65 kW 10 kW 80 kW

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

33

34

RF-Amplifier-CRYELECTRA

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.HuttelSame transistor, same power-supply as SOLEIL

35

Visit ILSF / Test of ILSF Amplifier

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Same transistor same performance:Pout: 650 WGain: 20 dBEfficiency: 55%

36

Injection-Septum-Kicker

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

37

Extraction Septum

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel

Pulsed Magnets Parameter

TAC 2013 Reporting back E.Huttel38

Element Type Length Kick Pulse length

L [µH] U [V] I [A] C [µF] Field

Injection Septum

ElectrostaticHalf sine

R: 2 mL: 0.5 m

14.5° 250 µs 220110 000

3.75 10 MV/m

Injection Kicker

StriplineHalf sine

L: 0.3 m 3 mrad 6 µs 2 220 100 1.6 0.001 T

Extraction Bumper

Iron MagnetHalf sine

L 0.17 m 5 mrad 1.7 ms 700 200 150 440 0.080 T

Extraction Kicker

StriplineFlat-top

L: 1 m 2 mrad 40 ns190 ns

1 25000 280 50 Ω20 m PFN

0.005 T

Extraction Septum

C magnet, eddy currentHalf sine

R: 5.73 mL: 1m

10° 560 µs 10 220 4000 3500 0.465 T