taj: carec regional road corridor improvement projectcarec regional road corridor improvement...

Updated Short Resettlement Plan August 2009

TAJ: CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project Prepared by Cardno ACIL Pty Ltd, Australia for the Ministry of Transport and the Asian Development Bank.

Republic of Tajikistan: CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project

USRP-2

ADB Loan No. 2359-TAJ CAREC Regional Road Corridor

Improvement Project

Updated Short Resettlement Plan - 2

August 2009 Prepared by Cardno-Acil 14 Ayni Street, Room 310 Dushanbe 734042 Tajikistan

For Ministry of Transport and Communication

Republic of Tajikistan


USRP-2

Contents

Abbreviations A. Background 1 B. Updated SRP 2 C. Second Updating 4 D. Implementation Plan 6 E. Monitoring and Evaluation 32 Tables Table 1: Resettlement Entitlement Matrix 7 Table 2: Summary of Resettlement Requirements 8 Table 3: Costs Estimate for Compensation of Affected Households 9 Table 4: Comparison of ADB Policy with Tajikistan Land Code 11 Table 5: Cost Estimations 12 Table 6: Implementation Schedule 13 Table 7: Updated AP Compensation Matrix for Package 2 14 Table 8: AP Compensation Payment List and Hukumat Chairman’s Letter-Package 2 20 Table8A: Amended AP Compensation Payment List & Chairman’s Letter-Package 2 25 Table 9: List of the Resettlement Rates Used by MBTI 31 Annexures Annex-1 Compensation Payment Details 33 Annex-1A Amended Compensation Payment Details 65 Annex-2 Minutes of the Meeting 68 Annex-3 Public Complaints Resolving Process 71 Annex-4 Resettlement Monitoring Framework 72


USRP-2

Currency Equivalents (as of 12 August 2009)

Currency Unit – Somoni (TJS)

US$ 1.00=TJS4.45

Abbreviations

ADB Asian Development Bank AP Affected Person CSC Construction Supervision Consultant Hukumat Local Government for Rayon MBTI Inter District Technical Inventory Bureau MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication PIU Project Implementation Unit ROW Right-of-way Rayon Local level administration unit SRP Short Resettlement Plan USD United Stated Dollars

USRP-2 Updated Short Resettlement Plan - 2


Page 1 URSP-2

A. Background

1. The CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project includes the rehabilitation of a 114 km road section of the national road to Kyrgyz border. The Project aims to foster regional and international cooperation and sustainable economic growth in Tajikistan by increasing the efficiency and safety of transport between Dushanbe and Rasht valley in the north-east road corridor linking the capital Dushanbe to the Kyrgyz border. 2. The objectives of the Project are to (i) reduce poverty and promote sustainable economic growth in the area, and (ii) improve regional trade and cooperation. These objectives will be achieved (i) in the short-term by construction related activity, and (ii) in the long-term by the improvement of transport efficiency through reduction of transport costs to road users and improved access to markets and social services in the area. 3. The project will rehabilitate the Dushanbe-Kyrgyz border road from Nimich through Jirgatal to border post at Karamik. The construction of the road has been awarded as two contracts, the first being the rehabilitation of the 25 km road sector between Nimich and Sayron (package 2) and the second the 89 km road sector from Sayron to Karamik (package 1) in a corridor varying in width between 3 to 8 m to a maximum width of 13 m in urban areas 4. The Executing Agency for this project is the Ministry of Transport and Communication (MOTC). The Project Implementation Unit (PIU) established under the Ministry will function as the implementing agency while the Construction Supervision Consultant will perform the duties of the Engineer on behalf of the PIU. 5. The road rehabilitation works of the Project will have only limited resettlement impacts. Accordingly a Short Resettlement Plan (SRP) for the Project was prepared in June 2007 under TA 4784-TAJ, based on preliminary design information, general findings of survey data, field visits, secondary socio-economic data and consultation with local people and authorities. Relevant details of this SRP are summarized below:

i. All construction activities will take place on the existing established right-of-way (ROW).

ii. 7 households were identified in a short section of the alignment (within Tajikabad Rayon) that may be seriously affected, out of a total of 27 households that would be affected in some way by widening of the road reserve to accommodate drainage and pedestrian requirements.

iii. Paragraph 16 confirms that the SRP is based on preliminary design information which will have to be updated before the signing of contract awards, and that if anything the detailed design will more likely lead to a reduction of resettlement impacts.

iv. ‘Policy Framework and Entitlements’, ‘Institutional Arrangements’, ‘Consultation and Grievance Redress’, ‘Monitoring Arrangements’ and ‘Financial and Implementation Schedule’ are detailed in the report, and are not repeated in this report. A Resettlement Monitoring Framework prepared on behalf of the PIU and an implementation plan is, however, included in this update.

6. As part of the SRP process, and in addition to stakeholder meetings and consultations,


Page 2 URSP-2

a pamphlet in Tajik summarizing compensation eligibility and entitlement provisions has been distributed to all affected households. 7. Section VI, B of the October 2007 Report and Recommendation of the President (RRP) to the Board of Directors for ADB Loan 2359-TAJ for the CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project includes the following specific conditions for ‘Contract Award and Civil Works Mobilization’;

i. Paragraph 69 – No civil works contract for Nimich – Sayron (km217-242) section of the road under the Tajikistan component (i.e. Package 2) will be awarded until a final updated RP has been approved by ADB, and

ii. Paragraph 70 – No notice to proceed for the mobilization of civil works for Nimich - Sayron (km217-242) of the Tajikistan component will be given until the compensation and resettlement program in the final RP has been fully implemented to the satisfaction of ADB.

8. The Loan Agreement for the Project was signed by the MOTC and ADB on 03rd November 2007. Accordingly the MOTC allocated specific funds for ‘Land Acquisition and Resettlement’. 9. The project under consideration, Package 2: Nimich to Sayron (km217-242), has been tendered as a Design and Construct contract based on a preliminary road design, general layouts for all structures and a preliminary BOQ. The Loan Conditions referred to in Paragraph 6 above relate specifically to Package 2. 10. Tenders were received on 2nd May 2008. The lowest conforming bid price received for Package 2 was USD 33,102,015.04. Following the two part Technical Qualification Assessment and Financial Evaluation process, ADB approval to negotiate with China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC) for Package 2 was received on 06th August 2008. Negotiations to reduce the bid value to within available loan provisions included joint inspection of Site by MOTC and CRBC. After negotiations to reduce the scope of work and bid price to USD 20,000,000.00, a recommendation to award this contract to CRBC was submitted to the ADB on 15th August 2008. 11. Package 2 Site inspections during the tender negotiation process indicated that the final road alignment could be accommodated within the existing right-of-way (ROW) without significant resettlement impacts, and reduced costs. The Package 2 contract includes provisions which require the contractor to progressively submit final design information for road and bridge works to the Engineer for approval before commencing construction of each individual component. Through this process the Consultant will identify any Resettlement issues as they arise, and bring them to the attention of the PIU and Local Government of the Rayon (Hukumat) for necessary action in accordance with the procedures stated in the SRP.

B. Updated SRP

12. An Updated Short Resettlement Plan (August 2008) was prepared in August, 2008 fulfilling the requirement in paragraph 69 of the RRP and included the following information. 13. A further Site visit by the MOTC had been carried out on 19th August 2008 to


Page 3 URSP-2

specifically discuss Resettlement issues with the Tajikabad Rayon and the seven (7) households previously identified as being most seriously affected. Tables 1 and 4 from the SRP had confirmed that of the seven seriously affected persons who were offered alternative land plots only one requested a replacement plot. 14. One of the seven (7) houses previously identified in the SRP (June 2007) as being seriously affected was vacant – owner Safarov Mizrob of Kapali Village (km231) was in Russia and the whereabouts of his wife was not known. Contact efforts were continuing with the assistance of nearby villagers and the Hukumat. 15. Included with this updated report were the statements from the remaining six (6) of the seven seriously affected households and the Tajikabad Rayon, including the affected person (AP) who has received an alternative land plot. All of these households had confirmed that they had no objection to the commencement of works – vide summary below.

HOUSEHOLD REPRESENTATIVE LOCATION APPROXIMATE

ROAD KM COMMENT

Tuichiev M. (Passport # A 3604491)

Karasagir village 223 No objection to commencement of work

Vahobov I. (Passport # A 1282423)

Kapali village 231 No objection to commencement of work

Rajabov M. (Passport # A 498618)

Kaldarien village 232 No objection to commencement of work

Junaidov M. (Passport # A 1774504)

Mazori shing village

233 No objection to commencement of work

M. Khoshakova (Passport # A 4198144)

Mazori shing village

233 No objection to commencement of work

Ainiddin Hasharov (Passport # A 4197405)

Mulokenja village 236 Alternative land plot received and no objection to commencement of work

16. Three months of International and 5 months of National Social and Resettlement Specialist person-months have been included in the Consultancy for provision of Supervision Services for annual review and updating of the SRP and supervision of its implementation. 17. The community eagerly awaits the commencement of the Works and the benefits that they understand the project will bring. This stakeholder support, with the funding, arrangements and monitoring that have been put in place for construction, will be adequate to address any issues that may arise. 18. The letter from the Tajikabad Rayon Chairman attached to the Updated SRP (August 2008) confirmed that Mr Ainiddin Hasharov has been provided an alternative land plot as recommended by the SRP. This letter confirms the readiness of the Tajikabad Rayon to take


Page 4 URSP-2

appropriate action on any compensation issues that may arise during construction, and expresses their desire for the work to commence.

C. Second Updating

19. As a requirement of the Updated SRP (August 2008) the resettlement plan was again updated to include all the APs identified and confirmed subsequent to finalization of the ROW of package 2 and current costs. Package 2 of the CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project comprises the rehabilitation of a 25 km section of the national road from Nimich to Sayron in which the civil works includes widening of the current road alignment, reconstruction of road pavement and drainage structures, rehabilitation and replacement of bridges, and installation of road safety devices and traffic signs. 20. This second Updated Short Resettlement Plan August, 2009, (USRP-2), is prepared to accommodate the changes in the resettlement list and thereby the APs and compensation costs, which have been brought about by the alterations to the road designs in package 2. The design alterations have been made with due consideration to reduce land take as much as possible. USRP-2 is prepared using the final designs, verification of affected properties and APs through participatory surveys, and consultation of local people and local authorities. The main focus of USRP-2 is on Package 2 as the updating and verification of APs and affected properties in package 1 is in progress and yet to be completed. 21. The USRP-2 also includes the following relevant Tables from the Updated SRP of August 2008.

i. Table 1 : Resettlement Entitlement Matrix ii. Table 2 : Summary of Resettlement Requirements iii. Table 3 : Cost Estimate for Compensation of Affected Households iv. Table 4 : Comparison of ADB Policy with Tajikistan Land Code v. Table 5 : Cost Estimations vi. Table 6 : Implementation Schedule

Tables 3 and 5 were recommended to be progressively updated during construction, as the design of sections of the Works are submitted by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer in accordance with the Contract, and necessary action on Resettlement issues is taken by the PIU and Hukamat. Now, that the designs for the full road section have been finalized in Package 2 the information in these tables have been updated and incorporated into the USRP-2 as AP Compensation Matrix (Table 7), AP Compensation Payment List (Table 8) & Amended AP Compensation List (Table 8A), and Compensation Payment Details (Annex-1) & Amended Compensation Payment Details (Annex-1A). In Package 1, too, the updating team has been mobilized and the updating for a 10 km section has been completed. Detailed drawings for a further 20 km section are being processed prior to the updating exercise. The updating survey is to be completed by 30 September 2009 22. The updating of the list of the affected persons initiated by the consultant in late June was entrusted to an inter-agency team to ensure transparency and accountability. Persons representing the Deputy Resident Engineer (CSC), Project Implementation Unit (PIU), Inter District Technical Inventory Bureau (MBTI), District Chief Architect, Road Maintenance Administration, First Deputy District Chairman, and local NGOs comprised the inter-agency updating team. 23. The compensation costs has been prepared and certified by the following officers:

i) Sodiqov A, Director, MBTI, Rash District


Page 5 URSP-2

ii) Eshonov K, Chief of Construction and Planning Department, Tajikabad

iii) Rajabov M, Director of Sadoe Umed Pvt Ltd iv) Sharipov K, Employee, MBTI v) Sharipov B, Chief Accountant, DEU (RMU) vi) Shifoev L, Head of Kalayi-Labi-Ob Jamoat vii) Toshev N, Head of Shogadoev Jamot viii) Ramazonov Z, Head of Nushor Jamoat

The rates used by MBTI for calculating the individual AP payments is presented as Table 9 24. As the total cost of resettlement payments prepared by MBTI and submitted to PIU by the Chaiman of the Tajikabad Local Government for package 2, Somoni 507,930 (Table 8), exceeds the total funds allocated for both packages (US $ 100,000), PIU initiated a reassessment of the compensation entitlements. At an inter agency meeting with AP representatives from each village participating it has been agreed that payment for trees would not be made to the APs as the felled trees will be used by the APs themselves (vide Annex-2: Minutes of the Meeting). Thus, acting upon this decision MBTI has prepared an amended AP Compensation List (Table 8A) where the total compensation has been reduced to Somoni 384,059. (The amended Compensation Payment Details submitted by MBTI are presented as Annex-1A.) Accordingly, the Chairman of Tajikabad Local Government has amended his request for compensation payment cost to Somoni 384,059. As per the Chairman’s letter (Table 8A) the funds are be transferred to Tajikabad Local Government Office Account №20 BDA «Amonatbank» department of Tajikabad Region whereupon the Tajikabad Local Government will disburse the payments to the APs. The payments are expected to commence by 01 September 2009. 25. At the consultations during the resettlement list updating process it was noted that there were numerous public complaints with regard to the contractor’s activities along the ROW. These ranged from interruption of drinking water supplies to disruption of irrigation water and power supplies. As it was observed that most of the complaints were resulting from the construction or construction related activities a Public Complaints Registering and Resolving Process was developed and is being implemented at the site level. A summary of complaints and resolving action has been included as a reporting requirement of the monthly environmental report to be submitted to the Engineer by the Contractor. The documentation for the process is appended as Annex 3.


Page 6 URSP-2

D. Implementation Plan

2009 Activity

Responsibility Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Package 2

Completion of compensation payment reassessment

PIU

Transfer of funds to Tajikabad rayon

PIU

Payments to APs Chairman/Tajikabad rayon

Commence Resettlement Monitoring

PIU

Submit Monitoring Reports to ADB

PIU

Package 1

Prepare AP compensation matrix for balance road sectors

Engineer/PIU

Cost calculation by MBTI

MBTI/PIU

Review by PIU PIU/Engineer

Transfer of funds to Rayonal Offices

PIU

Commence payments Chairman/Rayonal offices

Resettlement monitoring PIU

Submit monitoring reports to ADB for Package 2 and 1

PIU


Page 7 URSP-2

Tables

Table 1: Resettlement Entitlement Matrix Loss Type Application AF AF No. Entitlement Implementation Issues

Land Use Loss of building premises partly encroaching in ROW

Building owner

27 HH Under Tajik Law, there is no cash compensation provided. Entitlement for rehabilitation is based on provision of an equivalent new plot of land.

Based on AP consultation, 7 seriously affected HH were offered alternate land plots as compensation for area of land lost, on the basis that the existing land would be given over in its entirety. Only 1 affected HH wanted to be relocated and requested a replacement plot. An alternate plot acceptable to the resettling HH has been allocated. All 6 other affected HH elected to remain on their existing, but reduced plots adjacent to the ROW, and waived rights of entitlement for allocation of a new plot.

Houses Within and next to ROW

Owner 7 HHs Full cash compensation at replacement cost free of depreciation, transaction costs/taxes and salvaged materials(285 Somoni/sqm.) Payment was agreed on the basis of compensation for the total area of the building, not just the area affected.

Structures (sheds or part thereof)

Within and next to ROW

Owner 24 HHS Full cash compensation at replacement cost fee of depreciation, transaction costs/taxes and salvaged materials (100 Somoni/sqm.) Payment agreed on the same basis as housing.

Tree losses (poplar or willow trees)

Within and next to ROW

Owner 6 HHs Full cash compensation based on wood value (50 Somoni/tree)

Transitional living/transport allowance

Relocating Owner 7 HHs (all 7 HHs will be entitled)

500 Somoni/HH

Vulnerable HH support

1 female- headed HH losing a house

Owner 1 HH 500 Somoni/HH

PIU within MOTC will assign one officer in charge of resettlement and will be directly responsible to co-ordinate the planning, implementation, financing and reporting of resettlement for the project. The Tajikabad Rayon and its 3 Jomoat governments will take the primary responsibility for the resettlement consultation, implementation and timely delivery of entitlements.

Note: (i) Compensation rates are the replacement values which were confirmed based on consultation with APs, but they will be finalized at DMS stage by a special agency according to the Land Code.(ii) Other impacts so far unidentified may occur during implementation. This entitlement matrix and description of compensation entitlements will be revised and updated accordingly.


Page 8 URSP-2

Table 2: Summary of Resettlement Requirements Village Karasagir Kapali &

Kaldarien Mazarishing Mullokenja Navobod Kichikizi

Section length (m) 1,100 1,600 2,100 1,000 1,000 400

Total

ROW Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing

Engineering work Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening

Affected HHs 1 11 7 4 2 2 27

Affected persons 6 94 78 25 13 12 228

Residential house (m2/HHs) 50/1 245/3 400/2 144/1 0 0 839/7

Simple structured sheds (m2/HHs) 0 358/9 272/7 179/4 90/2 105/2 1004/24

Poplars and willow (trees/HHs) 10/1 22/2 12/1 18/2 62/6

Source: design institute and census survey of affected households, 2007.


Page 9 URSP-2

Table 3: Costs Estimate for Compensation of Affected Households

Area of Land Plot Floor Areas of House Make

of Rate

Amount

TJS sq.m. sq.m. House/

Shed TJS/sq.m.

HH Name of Owner Location/ Village

Total Total Affected (based on total house)

Shed Area

Total House Area

Affected Area

(type)1

A B C

1 Tuichiev Mahmadjon Karasagir 1500 50 0 50 45 B 285 100 14250

2 Boimotov Jumabek Kapali 1300 10 10 C 100 1000

3 Hasanov Muhabbatshoh Kapali 1000 90 90 C 100 9000

4 Safarov Mizrob Kapali 1300 105 0 105 50 B 285 29925

5 Vahobov Ilyos Kapali 2000 90 0 90 50 B 285 25650

6 Mahmadov Sulton Kapali 1500 15 15 C 100 1500

7 Sharipov Nurullo Kapali 1200 65 65 C 100 6500

8 Zaripov Shokir Kapali 1500 45 45 C 100 4500

9 Ismoilov Mahmadruzi Kapali 1500 15 15 C 100 1500

10 Tavakkalov Khasval Kapali 2000 6 6 C 100 600

11 Saburova Sumbul Kapali 2000 32 32 C 100 3200

12 Rajabov Mumin Kaldarien 1200 130 80 50 32 B,C 285 100 17450


Page 10 URSP-2

13 Junaidov Hikmat Mazori-Shing 800 358 38 320 80 B,C 285 100 95000

14 Khoshakova Majoizkhon Mazori-Shing 1200 120 40 80 80 B,C 285 100 26800

15 Abdurakhmonova Fotima Mazori-Shing 1200 15 15 C 100 1500

16 Mahmadov Faiziddin Mazori-Shing 1200 15 15 C 100 1500

17 Rajabov Suhrob Mazori-Shing 1800 80 80 C 100 8000

18 Sharipov Zarif Mazori-Shing 1200 20 20 C 100 2000

19 Salomov Jamshed Mazori-Shing 1000 64 64 C 100 6400

20 Hasharov Ainiddin * Mulokenja 1000 194 50 144 112 B,C 285 100 46040

21 Saidkhojaev Dovudkhon Mulokenja 1200 35 35 C 100 3500

22 Homidov Yusuf Mulokenja 1500 70 70 C 100 7000

23 Sharipov Sharof Mulokenja 1400 24 24 C 100 2400

24 Ismoilov Saivali Navobod 1500 20 20 C 100 2000

25 Shukhieva Amrbi Navobod 1500 70 70 C 100 7000

26 Mansurov Ilyos Kichikyzy 1200 65 65 C 100 6500

27 Sharipov Jalol Kichikyzy 1200 40 40 C 100 4000 TOTAL: 1843 1004 839 449 334,715

1 Type A = Brick; Type B = Mud, C = Shed Notes: (1) * indicates that a new plot is to be allocated to Hasarov Ainiddin


Page 11 URSP-2

Table 4: Comparison of ADB Policy with Tajikistan Land Code

ADB Policy Requirements

Tajikistan Land Code (LC) Provisions Reconciliation Provisions

The APs are to be informed and consulted on resettlement/ compensation options.

The LC does not provide for consultation In this project APs were consulted on options. The SRP will be disclosed to them.

If displacement of population is unavoidable, it should be minimized by exploring all viable options.

The LC discourages acquisition of agricultural land when more marginal land is available, at infrastructure planning stage.

The project only rehabilitates existing ROW with minor widening around Tajikabad.

Compensation/rehabilitation costs are to be fully included in project budgets.

The provision of the local law is silent on cost of social preparation and livelihood programs

The RP will detail all costs related to the compensation/rehabilitation program.

Lack of formal legal title to the land by some affected groups should not be a bar to compensation or rehabilitation.

The LA has no similar provision. The AF so affected will receive assistance with provision of building materials in lieu of land-use loss rehabilitation allowance.

Beside compensation at replacement cost for land, houses, crops, trees and businesses, ADB policy provides for rehabilitation provisions for severely affected and vulnerable APs and transport/transition livelihood costs.

The LC provides for compensation on the basis of equivalent land plot allocation for land, and compensation at replacement cost for structures, crops, trees and for business income but does not cover the rehabilitation of severely affected AFs and vulnerable people nor provides for transport/transition costs.

Special assistances for the 7 seriously affected HHs are included in the SRP. Alternate land plots have been offered to the 7 seriously affected HH’s, bit only 1 HH has requested such an allocation for relocation purposes.


Page 12 URSP-2

Table 5: Cost Estimations * Item Unit Quantity

Demolishing of Residential houses sq. meter 839 Demolishing of simple structured sheds sq. meter 1004 Cutting of poplar and willow trees tree 62 Transitional and transport subsidy to seriously affected HHs whose residential houses will be affected.(whilst only 1 hh to be relocated, allowance has been made for 3 additional HH’s to recive this allowance if repairs require temporary relocation)

HH 4

Requirements

Special support to a seriously affected and female-headed HH

HH 1

1. Basic Cost 1.1. Compensation for structures and trees

Residential houses/shop (285 Somoni/㎡) Somoni 239,315 Sheds (100 Somoni/㎡) Somoni 95,400 Poplar and willow trees (50 Somoni/tree) Somoni 3,100

1.2 Income rehabilitation and subsides For transitional living and disturbance (500/HH) Somoni 3,500 For vulnerable HH (500 Somoni/HH) Somoni 500

1.3 Provisions for living infrastructures and for planting seedling

Living infrastructures Somoni 10,000 Seedlings Somoni 80 Sub-total (basic cost) Somoni 351,895 2. Management, M&E and contingency

Management (10% of basic cost) Somoni 35,190 M&E (5% of basic cost)) Somoni 17,595 Contingency (10% of basic cost) Somoni 35,190

Sub-total Somoni 87,975 Total cost Somoni 439,987

Budget

Total cost US$ 127,870 *: To be decided upon final design.


Page 13 URSP-2

Table 6: Implementation Schedule Milestone events Timing Responsibility Note

Preparation of SRP Part of Project Design Consultant

Project Approval Prior to Loan Approval MOTC/ADB

Consultation of local authority, community and households

Field work stage for DMS and project design

Design institute PIU, Local authority

Finalize compensation rates and procedures determined

Updating of the resettlement plan based on available design and submit to ADB for approval

Prior to award of contracts PIU

Approval of contract awards After updated RP has been approved ADB Approval of contract

awards

Official notice to affected community and HHs

2 months before project construction work

PIU and Local Land Committee

Written notice, including compensation procedures and rates, and grievance redress process

Visit of affected HHs for feedback

Within 0.5 month after official notice PIU Through Rayon and

Jomoat

Agreement with affected HHs 0.5 month after official notice

PIU and affected HHs

With assistance from Rayon and Jamoat authority

Payment of compensation and structure removal before civil works

1 month after agreement and completion within 0.5 month

PIU and affected HHs


Handing over of fully prepared plots under land x land compensation arrangements.

As soon as possible after official note Hukumat As requested by

individual HH’s

Payment of compensation for house repair

As soon as possible after official note

PIU and individual HHs

Rebuilding or repairing structures on the original plots Before civil works Affected HHs


Resettlement in new locations-optional Before civil works Affected HHs and

local government

Complaint and Grievances As required (continuous) Payment of compensation for house repair

Immediately after construction

PIU and individual HHs

Impact monitoring As the above occurs Independent agency appointed by PIU

Covered by the overall social and poverty impact monitoring

Full completion of the compensation rehabilitation program

MOTC/PIU/Hukumat

Approval of contractors mobilization in the field and hand over of ROW

PIU/Consultant Progressive handover of the site


Page 14 URSP-2

Table 7: Updated AP Compensation Matrix for Package 2: Nimich – Sayron; km 217-km242

Kapali

N/n Name shed clay

fence wicker fence

cooking place poplar willow

AP signature

1 Abdukarim Murodov 90m

38No.-D10cm 11 No.-d25cm

2 Abdulvose

Safarov 18х2х0,3m 1No.-90cm

3 Mamatohir Odinaev 4,4х10m 77х2х0,3m 3х4m

4 Sybhidin

Ahmadov 2No.-D10cm 1No.-d65cm 1No.-d30cm 5 Mizrob Safarov 20х2х0,3m

6 Saidvohid

Eftakov 1No.-30cm 1No.-10cm 7 DEU 43No.-d40cm 8 Sebzor village 200No.-d25cm Edgor Tuichiev


Page 15 URSP-2

(Table 7 contd…) Mullokenja

Mo. Name shed RCC

fence storage clay fence poplar willow pear nutwood apple apricot mulberry

1 davlatpocho Saidhojaeva 16х2,5х0,4 8No.-d20cm

2 Mahmadsoleh

Sadirov 43х2х0,4m 3No.-d30cm 7No-d45cm

3 Mahmadnabi

Sadirov 2х3m 2,5х4m 150х2х0,4m 2No-d10cm 1No-d70cm 7No-d15cm

2,5х4m 1No-d15cm 1No-d10cm 4 Umar Shoev 2х2m 18m 56х2х0,4 20No-d50cm 6No-d20cm 1No-d60cm 4No-d20cm 1No-d50cm

2х2m 3No-d30cm

5 Subhidin Sattorov 8х4m 65х2,5х0,4m 3No-d50cm 12No-d25cm 1No-d25cm

6 Akmal

Abdurahmonov 100х2,5х0,4m 20No-d25cm 4No-d30cm 5No-d20cm 1No-d80cm 1No-d20cm 1No-d50cm 2No-d60cm

7 Mirzodavlat Mahmadov 64No-d8cm

Shahrihon Davlatova 63х2,5х0,4m 12No-d30cm 1No-d30cm 1No-d20cm 4No-d20cm

8 Mamadjonov Nahtiya Izatova 48х2,5х0,4m 4No-d30cm 7No-d30cm 5No-d15cm 2No-d20cm 10No-d15cm 4No-d20cm

9 Dovudhon Saidhojaev 5х7m 2х2m 45х2,5х0,4m 1Nod20cm 1No-d50cm 2No-d15cm 8No-20cm 2Nod20cm

2No-d15cm 6No-d20cm

10 Ashuja Faromazov 2х2m 76х2,5х0,4m 8No-d15cm 24No-d10cm

11 Emom Saidhojaev 9х10m 6No-d60cm 10No-d43cm

12 Karim Shodiev steel fence 130No-d20cm 7No-d15cm 1No-d20cm 20No-d10cm

School №10 100m


Page 16 URSP-2

(Table 7 contd…) Navobod

No. Name shed shelter steel net RCC fence storage clay fence poplar willow pear nutwood apple

1 M.Rasulov 6х4m 83m 80No-15cm 70No-d35cm

Mullo

2 A.Ismoilov 5х9m 24х2,5х0,4m 34No--d20cm 5No--d12cm

3 O.Mirzoeva 6х5m 5х4м 16х2,5х0,4m 2No--d20см 1No--d50cm

1,5х2,5х0,4m

4 A.Sharipov 8х10m 10,5х6m 3,5х1,5m 70No--d20cm 1No--d30cm

conc.found.1.5m conc.found.1.5m conc.found..1.5m 2No--d40cm

6х6m

conc.found.1.5m

5 T.Shohmahmadov 3х5m 38х2,5х0,4m 45No--d20cm

6 S.Ismoilova 5х6m 61х2,5х0,4m 12No--d12cm 2No--d30cm

7 S.Sharipov

A.Gafurova 51х2,5х0,4m 40No--d26cm 10No--d0cm

8 S.Rasulov 36х2,5х0,4m 25No--d15cm 30No--d40cm

9 R.Rasulov 6х4m 3х4m 54х2,5х0,4m 20No--d20cm

маг.4,5х9m 80No--d10cm

10 M.Ismoilov 56х2,5х0,4m 25No--d20cm 15No--d20cm 1No--d10cm 1No--d10cm 4No--d15cm

11 S.Ismoilov 53х2,5х0,4m 11No--d11cm

12 N.Ismoilov 7No--d15cm

13 I.Isroilov 7No--d15cm


Page 17 URSP-2

(Table 7 contd…) Kichikzi

No. Name clay fence shelter date willow AP

signature

1 Adham

Davlyaytov 56х2,5х0,4m 19No.-d20cm 2 Ismon Taibov 57х2,5х0,4m 12No.-d20cm 3 Rafoat Salimova 159х2,5х0,4m 2х4m 10No.-d15сcm 8No.-d20cm

4 Kamar

Maksudov 127х2,5х0,4

Mazorishing

NO. Name shed clay fence storage poplar willow pear nutwood apple apricot mulberry peach signature

1 Kizdarhon Salimova 57х2,5х0,4m 5No.-d10cm

2 Zarif Sharipov 22,5х2,5х0,4m 5х3m 1No.-d10cm 1No.-d15cm 1No.-d5cm

2No.-d5cm 3 Tojiddin Mahmudov 5х5m 55х2х0,4m 1No.-10cm 1No.-d70cm 1No.-d20cm 4No.-d5cm

4 Mansur Abdurahmonov 38х2,5х0,4m 23No.-d20cm 5 Jumabek Mahmudov 12No.-d25cm 3No.-d15cm

6 Zoirshoh Pirov 7No.- d20cm 3No.-d15cm 7 Farida Kutbudinova 18No-d15cm 37No.-d15cm


Page 18 URSP-2

(Table 7 contd…) Mazorishing - 2

NO. Name shed clay fence poplar willow pear cherry soil apricot culvert D25mm AP

signature

1 Dilshod Salomov 45х2,5х0,4m 1No.-d30cm

2 Azizpocho

Maksudova 2,5х2m 12х2,5х0,4m 7No.-d20cm 2No.-d10cm 1No.-d15cm

3 Hikmat Junaidov 28х2,5х0,4m 32No.-d20см 6No.-d20cm 2-trip

4 Usufjon

Mahmudov 27х2,5х0,4m 9No.-d30см 3m

5 Gulandom Odinaeva 25х2,5х0,4m 40No.-d40cm

Mazorishing - 3

NO. Name shed clay fence poplar willow pear cherry soil apricot AP

signature

1 Handullo Salomov 36х2,5х0,4m 22No.-d15cm 16No.-d10cm

Kaladariyen

NO. Name clay fence poplar willow pear cherry soil apricot AP

signature 1 Mumin Rajabov 18х2,5х0,4 35No.-d20cm 2 Husniddin Golibov 12No.-d20cm

(source: Resettlemet List Updating Survey, July 2009)


Page 19 URSP-2


Page 20 URSP-2

Table 8 AP Compensation Payment List and Hukumat Chairman’s Letter-Package 2 14 July 2009 Tajikabad Ref No. 244

Attention to: Minister of Transport and

Communication of the Republic of Tajikistan Dear Abdurahim Ashur

Cc: Executive Director of Project Implementation Unit

Dear Mr. Nizom Hakimov

Due to the high speed of construction works under CAREC Regional Road Carridor

Improvement Project (Dushanbe – Kirgriz boarder) the Local Government of Tajikabad region expresses appreciation and we wish that in the defined period the road would be under operation.

For the households’ resettlement properties on Package 2, KM 217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project Phase 3, a critical need has occurred. On this basis we request from you to consider the transfer of the amount of 507,930.00 (five hundred seven thousands and nine hundred thirty) Somoni to the account number of №20 BDA «Amonatbank» department for the resettlement purpose.

After household compensations payment the confirming documents will be submitted to you.

Sincerely Yours,

Chairman of Tajikabad Region M. Fozilov


Page 21 URSP-2

(Table 8 contd…) I confirm Chairman of Tajikabad Region _______________Fozilov. M «_______»__________2009.

Package 2, km217 – km242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project, Phase 3

Resettlement of Population (affected) No Surname and name Amount

KAPALI VILLAGE 1 Murodov Abdukarim 3.059.0 2 Safarov Abdulvohid Toshmatovich 1.411.0 3 Odinaev Muhammadtohir Fathuddinovich 18.655.0 4 Ahmadov Subhuddin 230.0 5 Safarov Mirzo Sangakovich 1.368.0 6 Yoftakov Saivohid Mahmadulloevich 80.0 7 Sharipov Bakhtiyor Mahmadyorovich 3.440.0 8 Tuichiev Yodgor Abrororuddinovich 10.000.0

SUBTOTAL: 38.243.0 MAZORI SHING VILLAGE

9 Salimova Kizdarkhon Karimovna 6.598.0 10 Sharipov Zarif 6.490.0 11 Mahmudov Tojiddin Homidjonovich 11.733.0 12 Abdurahmonov Mansur Majidovich 5.252.0 13 Mahmudov Jumabek Homidjonovich 690.0 14 Pirov Zoirsho Emkhamadovich 378.0 15 Qutbuddinova Farida 2.010.0 16 Rajabov Mumin Mulojonovich 3.452.0 17 Salomov Dilshod Mahmadovich 5.250.0 18 Maqsudova Azizpocho Rajabovna 5.363.0 19 Junaidov Hikmatullo 4.712.0 20 Mahmudov Yusufjon Mahmadjonovich 3.618.0 21 Odinaeva Gulandom Khudoyorovna 6.050.0 22 Salomov Khandullo Gafurovich 5.724.0 23 Golibov Husniddin 480.0

SUBTOTAL: 67800.0 MULLOKENJA VILLAGE

24 Saedkhojaeva Davlatpocho Faromarzovna 2.144.0 25 Sadirov Mahmadsoleh Davlatyorovich 4.731.0 26 Sadirov Mahmadnabi Davlatyorovich 21.336.0 27 Shoev Umar Mahmadkhojaevich 13.591.0 28 Satorov Subhuddin Gaforovich 16.081.0 29 Abdurahmonov Akmal Karimdodovich 13.840.0 30 Davlatova Shahrikhon Shodievna 9.226.0


Page 22 URSP-2

No Surname and name Amount 31 Izzatova Nakhtiya 9.012.0 32 Saedkhojaev Dovutkhon Faromarzovich 16.334.0 33 Falomarzov Askhuja 12.740.0 34 Saedkhojaev Emom Askarovich 23.099.0 35 Shodiev Karim 8.530.0

SUBTOTAL: 150.664.0 NAVOBOD VILLAGE

36 Rasulov Mahmadi Sharifovich 21.628.0 37 Ismoilov Abdullo Saedvalievich 14.975.0 38 Mirzoeva Oisha Jalolovna 16.590.0 39 Sharipov Ayub 39.832.0 40 Shomhamadov Tohir Sharipovich 10.993.0 41 Ismoilov Sunat Saedvalievich 14.895.0 42 Gafurova Aftobkhon 15.815.0 43 Rasulov Sulaimon Muhiddinovich 8.694.0 44 Rasulov Rahmon Muhiddinovich 39.777.0 45 Ismoilov Mahmadali Saedvalievich 9.424.0 46 Ismoilov Saivali 7.124.0 47 Ismoilov Nazrvali Nuralievich 1.650.0 48 Isroilov Ikromuddin Nazriddinovich 1.580.0

SUBTOTAL: 202.977.0 KICHIKZI VILLAGE

49 Davlatov Adhamjon 7.144.0 50 Taibov Ismon 6.978.0 51 Salimova Rafoat Kirgizovna 19.646.0 52 Maqsudov Qamar Muzafarovich 14.478.0

SUBTOTAL: 48.246.0 TOTAL OF ALL: 507.930.0

Certified by: 1. Sodiqov A –Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Rasht District:- 2. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 3. Rajabov M – Director of Sadoe Umed Pv.Ltd:- 4. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 5. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 6. Shifoev L – Head of Kalayi-Labi-Ob Jamoat:- 7. Toshev N – Head of Shogadoev Jamoat:- 8. Ramazonov Z – Head of Nushor Jamoat:-

(Scanned copy of MBTI original compensation payments list is presented below)


Page 23 URSP-2


Page 24 URSP-2


Page 25 URSP-2

Table 8A Amended AP Compensation Payment List and Hukumat Chairman’s Letter-Package 2

CHAIRMAN OF TAJIKABAD RAYON

REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN 14 July 2009 Tajikabad Ref No. 244

Attention to: Minister of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Tajikistan

Dear Abdurahim Ashur

Cc: Executive Director of Project Implementation Unit

Dear Mr. Nizom Hakimov

Due to the high speed of construction works under CAREC Regional Road Corridor

Improvement Project (Dushanbe – Kyrgyz Border) the Local Government of Tajikabad Raoyn expresses appreciation and we wish that in the defined period the road would be under operation.

For the households’ resettlement properties on Package 2, km217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project Phase 3, a critical need has occurred. On this basis we request you to consider the transfer of the amount of 384,069.00 (three hundred eighty four thousands and sixty nine) Somoni to the account number of №20 BDA «Amonatbank» department for the resettlement purpose.

After household compensations payment the confirming documents will be submitted to you.

Sincerely yours, Chairman of Tajikabad Rayon M. Fozilov


Page 26 URSP-2

«I confirm» Chairman of Tajikabad region _______________Fozilov. M «_______»__________2009.

Package 2, km217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project, Phase 3

Resettlement of population No Name Amount

KAPALI VILLAGE 1 Safarov Abdulvohid Toshmatovich 1.231.0 2 Odinaev Muhammadtohir Fathuddinovich 18.655.0 3 Safarov Mirzo Sangakovich 1.368.0 4 Sharipov Bakhtiyor Mahmadyorovich 3.440.0

SUBTOTAL: 24.694.0 MAZORI SHING VILLAGE

5 Salimova Kizdarkhon Karimovna 6.498.0 6 Sharipov Zarif 6.150.0 7 Mahmudov Tojiddin Homidjonovich 10.993.0 8 Abdurahmonov Mansur Majidovich 4.332.0 9 Rajabov Mumin Mulojonovich 2.052.0 10 Salomov Dilshod Mahmadovich 5.130.0 11 Maqsudova Azizpocho Rajabovna 3.703.0 12 Junaidov Hikmatullo 3.192.0 13 Mahmudov Yusufjon Mahmadjonovich 3.618.0 14 Odinaeva Gulandom Khudoyorovna 2.850.0 15 Salomov Khandullo Gafurovich 5.084.0

SUBTOTAL: 53.602.0 MULLOKENJA VILLAGE

16 Saedkhojaeva Davlatpocho Faromarzovna 1.824.0 17 Sadirov Mahmadsoleh Davlatyorovich 3.921.0 18 Sadirov Mahmadnabi Davlatyorovich 19.896.0 19 Shoev Umar Mahmadkhojaevich 9.721.0 20 Satorov Subhuddin Gaforovich 15.061.0 21 Abdurahmonov Akmal Karimdodovich 11.400.0 22 Davlatova Shahrikhon Shodievna 7.182.0 23 Izzatova Nakhtiya 5.472.0 24 Saedkhojaev Dovutkhon Faromarzovich 14.694.0 25 Falomarzov Askhuja 9.620.0 26 Saedkhojaev Emom Askarovich 21.519.0 27 Shodiev Karim 600.0

SUBTOTAL: 120.980.0 NAVOBOD VILLAGE

28 Rasulov Mahmadi Sharifovich 5.738.0 29 Ismoilov Abdullo Saedvalievich 13.495.0 30 Mirzoeva Oisha Jalolovna 14.415.0


Page 27 URSP-2

31 Sharipov Ayub 36.972.0 32 Shomhamadov Tohir Sharipovich 7.873.0 33 Ismoilov Sunat Saedvalievich 14.127.0 34 Gafurova Aftobkhon 13.495.0 35 Rasulov Sulaimon Muhiddinovich 4.104.0 36 Rasulov Rahmon Muhiddinovich 16.312.0 37 Ismoilov Mahmadali Saedvalievich 6.384.0 38 Ismoilov Saivali 6.042.0

SUBTOTAL: 138.957.0 KICHIKZI VILLAGE


SUBTOTAL: 45.486.0 TOTAL OF ALL: 384.059.0

1. Eshonov H – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 2. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- 3. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 4. Shifoev L – Head of Kalayi-Labi-Ob Jamoat:- 5. Toshev N – Head of Shogadoev Jamoat:- 6. Ramazonov Z – Head of Nushor Jamoat:- (Scanned copy of Tajikabad Chairman’s amended letter and MBTI amended compensation payments list is presented below)


Page 28 URSP-2


Page 29 URSP-2


Page 30 URSP-2


Page 31 URSP-2

Table 9 List of the Resettlement Rates Used by MBTI

Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau A.Sodikov

No Description of works Measure unit Unit rate (Somoni) Justification 1. Wattle and daub residential

house m2 239.1 Manual on Estimating

2. Nonresidential premise m2 Standards Part 1 & 2 Shed, shelter, storehouse m2 239.1 Order on indices 3. Clay fence m3 114 dated 10.03.2005 4. Wooden fence m2 12.96 113/13 5. Poplar cm 2.0 calculation 6. Willow cm 2.0 --//-- 7. Mulberry pcs/t 60 --//-- 8. Peach pcs/t 60 --//-- 9. Walnut pcs/t 60 --//-- 10. Apple pcs/t 120 --//-- 11. Pears and other fruit trees pcs/t 120 --//--


Page 32 URSP-2

E. Monitoring and Evaluation

26. As the impacts of the road rehabilitation activities on the APs and properties are limited simple process monitoring has been recommended to check that adequate and timely compensation is paid to APs. PIU could utilize allocations under the Land Acquisition and Resettlement budget for internal monitoring and evaluation. Quarterly reports on progress of resettlement monitoring will be submitted to the ADB by the PIU. 1. Purpose and Tasks 27. The purpose of internal monitoring is to maintain supervision responsibility of the resettlement organs as specified in the SRP during implementation, and ensure that the project can be constructed smoothly and APs’ entitlements are accounted for. The monitoring will be performed by PIU. Resettlement Specialist of the PIU staff will be responsible for the monitoring. 2. Monitoring Contents 28. Main contents of the monitoring include:

Disbursement and utilization of compensation funds; including: (i) if the replacement value principle was followed; and (ii) if payment was made fully and timely.

Selection and allocation of new house plots in case affected households prefer resettlement elsewhere (only one AP had opted for relocation); including: (i) if APs’ wishes were met; (ii) availability of utility services and present living condition; (iii) size and structure changes of the dwelling before and after relocation; (iv) progress and problems; and (v) payment of relocation allowances.

Support to vulnerable groups; including: (i) compensation for income loss; and (iii) other assistance.

Public participation and consultation during implementation; including: (i) participation process; and (ii) consultation contents and approach.

Grievances and appeals, the process and the results, including redress measures.

3. Monitoring Procedures 29. A Resettlement Monitoring Framework to oversee and monitor the whole process of resettlement has been prepared by the consultant on behalf of the PIU and is presented as Annexure 4 of this report. The frame work includes the objectives of monitoring, the process of monitoring, roles and responsibilities and the methodology to be employed in carrying out the monitoring, monitoring indicators and frequency, resources available and the expected outcome of the monitoring. 30. PIU will prepare quarterly summary progress reports on resettlement implementation and monitoring and submit to ADB.


Page 33 URSP-2

Annexures

Annex-1: Compensation Payment Details

List for Demolishment

Under Nimich - Sayron Project km217-km242 KAPALI VILLAGE

No. Name shed clay fence wicker fence cooking place poplar willow AP

signature 1 Murodov Abdukarim 90m

38

piece-D10cm 11 piece-d25cm 2 Safarov Abdulvose 18х2х0,3m 1 piece-90cm 3 Odinaev Mamatohir 4,4х10m 77х2х0,3m 3х4m

4 Ahmadov Sybhidin 2

piece-D10cm 1 piece-d65cm 1 piece-d30cm 5 Safarov Mizrob 20х2х0,3m 6 Eftakov Saidvohid 1 piece-30cm 1piece-10cm

7 DEU (RMU) 43

piece-D40cm

8 Sebzor village 200

piece-D25cm Tuichiev Edgor


Page 34 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Package 2, KM 217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project, Phase 3

Resettlement of population (affected)

No Surname and name Amount

KAPALI VILLAGE 1 Murodov Abdukarim 3.059.0 2 Safarov Abdulvohid Toshmatovich 1.411.0 3 Odinaev Muhammadtohir Fathuddinovich 18.655.0 4 Ahmadov Subhuddin 230.0 5 Safarov Mirzo Sangakovich 1.368.0 6 Yoftakov Saivohid Mahmadulloevich 80.0 7 Sharipov Bakhtiyor Mahmadyorovich 3.440.0 8 Tuichiev Yodgor Abrororuddinovich 10.000.0

SUBTOTAL: 38.243.0 1. Sodiqov A –Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Tajikabad region:- 2. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 3. Rajabov M – Director of Pv.Ltd «Sadoe Umed»:- 4. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 5. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 6. Shifoev L – Head of Kalayi-labi-ob Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Region Kapali Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Murodov Abdukarim No. Description measurement

unit quantity rate amount

1 Wicker fence M2 135 12.96 1.749.0 2 Poplar Piece 38-10cm 2.0 760.0 3 Willow Piece 11-25cm 2.0 550.0 TOTAL: 3.059.0

1. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 2. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 3. Sharipov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 4. Zoerov H – Chief of DEU (RMU):-


Page 35 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Kapali Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Safarov Abdulvose No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 10.8 114.0 1.231.0 2 Willow Piece 1-90cm 2.0 180.0

TOTAL: 1.411.0



The cost of population resettlement: Odinaev Mahmadtohir No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 46.2 114.0 5.266.0 2 Shed M2 44 239.1 10.520.0 3 Cooking place M2 12 231.1 2.869.0

TOTAL: 18.655.0 1. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 2. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 3. Sharipov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 4. Zoerov H – Chief of DEU (RMU):-


The cost of population resettlement: Ahmadov Subhuddin No. Description measurement


1 Poplar Piece 2-10cm 2.0 40.0 2 Willow Piece 1-65cm 2.0 130.0 3 Willow Piece 1-30cm 2.0 60.0 TOTAL: 230.0



Page 36 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Safarov Mizrob No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 12.0 114.0 1.368.0 TOTAL: 1.368.0



The cost of population resettlement: Yoftakov Saivohid No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 1-30cm 2.2 60.0 2 Willow Piece 1-10cm 2.2 20.0 TOTAL: 80.0



The cost of population resettlement: Sharifov Bakhtyor – DEU (RMU) No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 43-40cm 2.0 3.440.0 TOTAL: 3.440.0



Page 37 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Tuichiev Yodgor No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 200-40cm 2.0 10.000.0 TOTAL: 10.000.0



Page 38 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…)

MAZORI SHING VILLAGE -1

NO. Name shed clay fence storage poplar willow pear nutwood apple apricote mulberry peach AP

signature

1 Salimova Kizdarhon 57х2,5х0,4m 5pcs-d10cm

2 Sharipov Zarif 22,5х2,5х0,4m 5х3m 1pcs-d10cm 1pcs.-d15cm 1pcs.-d5cm

2pcs.-d5cm

3 Mahmudov Tojiddin 5х5m 55х2х0,4m 1pcs.-10cm 1pcs.-d70cm 1pcs.-d20cm 4pcs.-d5cm

4 Abdurahmonov Mansur 38х2,5х0,4m 23pcs.-d20cm

5 Mahmudov Jumabek 12pcs.-d25cm 3pcs.-d15cm

6 Pirov Zoirshoh 7pcs.- d20cm 3pcs.-d15cm

7 Kutbudinova Farida 18pcs-d15cm 37pcs.-d15cm

MAZORI SHING VILLAGE -2

NO. Name shed clay fence poplar willow pear crab cherry soil/earth apricot

pipe line

d25mm AP

signature

1 Salimov Dilshod 45х2,5х0,4m 1pcs.-d30cm

2 Maqsudov Azizpocho 2,5x2m 12х2,5х0,4m 7pcs.-d20cm 2pcs.-d10cm 1pcs.-d15cm

3 Junaidov Hikmat 28х2,5х0,4m 32pcs.-d20cm 6pcs.-d20cm

2-truck ride/haul

4 Mahmudov Yusufjon 27х2,5х0,4m 9pcs.-d30cm 3m

5 Odinaev Gulandom 25x2,5x0,4m 40pcs.-d40cm


Page 39 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) MAZORI SHING VILLAGE -3

NO. Name clay fence poplar mulberry pear crab

cherry soil/earth apricot AP signature

1 Salomov Khandullo 36х2,5х0,4m 22pcs.-d15cm 16pcs.-d10cm

KALDARYON VILLAGE No. Name clay fence shelter date willow AP signature 1 Rajabov Mumin 56х2,5х0,4m 19No.-d20cm 2 Golibov Husniddin 57х2,5х0,4m 12No.-d20cm


Page 40 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Package 2, KM 217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project, Phase 3


No Surname and name amount

MAZORI SHING VILLAGE

1 Salimova Kizdarkhon Karimovna 6.598.0 2 Sharipov Zarif 6.490.0 3 Mahmudov Tojiddin Homidjonovich 11.733.0 4 Abdurahmonov Mansur Majidovich 5.252.0 5 Mahmudov Jumabek Homidjonovich 690.0 6 Pirov Zoirsho Emkhamadovich 378.0 7 Qutbuddinova Farida 2.010.0 8 Rajabov Mumin Mulojonovich (Kaldaryn Village) 3.452.0 9 Salomov Dilshod Mahmadovich 5.250.0 10 Maqsudova Azizpocho Rajabovna 5.363.0 11 Junaidov Hikmatullo 4.712.0 12 Mahmudov Yusufjon Mahmadjonovich 3.618.0 13 Odinaeva Gulandom Khudoyorovna 6.050.0 14 Salomov Khandullo Gafurovich 5.724.0 15 Golibov Husniddin (Kaldaryan Village) 480.0

TOTAL: 67.800.0 1. Sodiqov A –Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Rasht

District:- 2. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 3. Rajabov M – Director of Pv.Ltd «Sadoe Umed»:- 4. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 5. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 6. Toshev N – Head of Shogadoev Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Region Mazori-shing Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Salimova Kizdarkhon No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 57 114.0 6.498.0 2 Poplar Piece 5-10cm 2.0 100.0



Page 41 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…)


The cost of population resettlement: Sharipov Zarif No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 22.5 114.0 2.564.0 2 Storage M2 15 239.1 3586.0 3 Poplar Piece 1-10cm 2.0 20.0 4 Apricot Piece 1-15cm 80.0 80 5 Apricot Piece 2-5cm 60.0 120.0 6 Peach Piece 1-5cm 120.0 120.0

TOTAL: 6.490.0



The cost of population resettlement: Mahmudov Tojiddin No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 44 114.0 5.016.0 2 Shed M2 25 239.1 5.977.0 3 Poplar Piece 1-10cm 2.0 20.0 4 Nut wood Piece 1-70cm 60.0 120.0 5 Mulberry Piece 1-20cm 60.0 120.0 6 Peach Piece 4-5cm 60.0 480.0

TOTAL: 11.733.0



Page 42 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Mazori-shing Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Abdurahmonov Mansur No. Description measurement unit quantity rate amount 1 Clay fence M2 38 114.0 4.332.0 2 Poplar Piece 23-20cm 2.0 920.0

TOTAL: 5.252.0



The cost of population resettlement: Mahmudov Jumabek No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 3-15cm 2.0 90.0 2 Poplar Piece 12-25cm 2.0 600.0 TOTAL: 690.0



Page 43 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Pirov Zoersho No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 3-15cm 2.0 90.0 2 Poplar Piece 7-20cm 2.0 288.0 TOTAL: 378.0



The cost of population resettlement: Kutbudinov Farida No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 37-15cm 2.0 1110.0 2 Poplar Piece 18-25cm 2.0 900.0 TOTAL: 2.010.0



The cost of population resettlement: Rajabov Mumin Mulojonovich No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 18 114.0 2.052.0 2 Willow Piece 20-35cm 2.0 1.400.0 TOTAL: 3.452.0



Page 44 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Golibov Husniddin No. Description measurement


1 Willow Piece 12-15cm 2.0 480.0 TOTAL: 480.0



The cost of population resettlement: Odinaeva Gulandom No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 25 114.0 2.850.0 2 Willow Piece 40-40cm 2.0 3.200.0 TOTAL: 6.050.0



The cost of population resettlement: Salomov Khandullo No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 36 114.0 4.104.0 2 Poplar Piece 22-15cm 2.0 660.0 3 Millbury Piece 16-10cm 60.0 960.0

TOTAL: 5.724.0



Page 45 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Junaidov Hikmatullo No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 28 114.0 3.192.0 2 Poplar Piece 32-20cm 2.0 1.280.0 3 Willow Piece 6-20cm 2.0 240.0



The cost of population resettlement: Mahmudov Yusufjon No. Description measurement





The cost of population resettlement: Salomov Dilshod No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 45 114.0 5.130.0 2 Pear Piece 1-30cm 120.0 120.0



Page 46 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…)


The cost of population resettlement: Maqsudov Azizpocho No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 12 114.0 2.508.0 2 Shed M2 5 239.1 1.195.0 3 Crab cherry Piece 2-10cm 120.0 240.0 4 Willow Piece 7-20cm 2.0 280.0 5 Apricot Piece 1-15cm 70.0 1.140.0

TOTAL: 5.363.0



Page 47 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…)

MULOKENJA VVIILLAGE

No. Name shed RCC fence storage

clay fence poplar willow pear nutwood apple apricot mulberry peach

1 davlatpocho Saidhojaeva 16х2,5х0,4 8No.-d20cm 2 Mahmadsoleh Sadirov 43х2х0,4m 3No.-d30cm 7No-d45cm 3 Mahmadnabi Sadirov 2х3m 2,5х4m 150х2х0,4m 2No-d10cm 1No-d70cm 7No-d15cm 2,5х4m 1No-d15cm 1No-d10cm 4 Umar Shoev 2х2m 18m 56х2х0,4 20No-d50cm 6No-d20cm 1No-d60cm 4No-d20cm 1No-d50cm 2х2m 3No-d30cm 5 Subhidin Sattorov 8х4m 65х2,5х0,4m 3No-d50cm 12No-d25cm 1No-d25cm 6 Akmal Abdurahmonov 100х2,5х0,4m 20No-d25cm 4No-d30cm 5No-d20cm 1No-d80cm 1No-d20cm 1No-d50cm 2No-d60cm 7 Mirzodavlat Mahmadov 64No-d8cm Shahrihon Davlatova 63х2,5х0,4m 12No-d30cm 1No-d30cm 1No-d20cm 4No-d20cm 8 Mamadjonov Nahtiya Izatova 48х2,5х0,4m 4No-d30cm 7No-d30cm 5No-d15cm 2No-d20cm 10No-d15cm 4No-d20cm 3No-d10cm 9 Dovudhon Saidhojaev 5х7m 2х2m 45х2,5х0,4m 1Nod20cm 1No-d50cm 2No-d15cm 8No-20cm 2Nod20cm 2No-d15cm 6No-d20cm

10 Ashuja Faromazov 2х2m 76х2,5х0,4m 8No-d15cm 24No-d10cm 11 Emom Saidhojaev 9х10m 6No-d60cm 10No-d43cm

12 Karim Shodiev steel fence 130No-d20cm 7No-d15cm 1No-d20cm 20No-d10cm

School №10 100m


Page 48 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Package 2, km217 – km242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project, Phase 3



MULLOKENJA VILLAGE 1 Saedkhojaeva Davlatpocho Faromarzovna 2.144.0 2 Sadirov Mahmadsoleh Davlatyorovich 4.731.0 3 Sadirov Mahmadnabi Davlatyorovich 21.336.0 4 Shoev Umar Mahmadkhojaevich 13.591.0 5 Satorov Subhuddin Gaforovich 16.081.0 6 Abdurahmonov Akmal Karimdodovich 13.840.0 7 Davlatova Shahrikhon Shodievna 9.226.0 8 Izzatova Nakhtiya 9.012.0 9 Saedkhojaev Dovutkhon Faromarzovich 16.334.0 10 Falomarzov Askhuja 12.740.0 11 Saedkhojaev Emom Askarovich 23.099.0 12 Shodiev Karim 8.530.0

13SUBTOTAL: 150.664.0

1. Sodiqov A –Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Rasht District:- 2. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 3. Rajabov M – Director of Pv.Ltd «Sadoe Umed»:- 4. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 5. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 6. Toshev N – Head of Shogadoev Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Region Mullokenja Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Sadirov Mahmadsoleh No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 34.4 114.0 3.921.0 2 Poplar Piece 3-30cm 2.0 180.0 3 Willow Piece 7-45cm 2.0 630.0

TOTAL: 4.731.0



Page 49 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Mullokenja Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Sadirov Mahmadnabi No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 120 114.0 13.680.0 2 Storage M2 10 239.1 2.391.0 3 Storage M2 10 239.1 2.391.0 4 Shed M2 6 239.1 1.434.0 5 Pear Piece 2-10cm 120.0 240.0 6 Pear Piece 1-15cm 120.0 120.0 7 Nut wood Piece 1-70cm 120.0 120.0 8 Nut wood Piece 1-10cm 120.0 120.0 9 Apple Piece 7-15cm 120.0 840.0

TOTAL: 21.336.0


Tajikabad Region Mullokena Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Shoev Umar No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 44.8 114.0 5.107.0 2 R/C fence M2 36 77.0 2.772.0 3 Shed M2 4 239.1 956.0 4 Shed M2 4 239.1 956.0 5 Poplar Piece 20-50cm 2.0 2000.0 6 Pear Piece 6-20cm 120.0 720.0 7 Nut wood Piece 1-60cm 120.0 120.0 8 Nut wood Piece 3-30cm 120.0 360.0 9 Apple Piece 4-20cm 120.0 480.0 10 Apricot Piece 1-50cm 12.0 120.0

TOTAL: 13.591.0



Page 50 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Mullokenja Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Satorov Subhuddin No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 65 114.0 7.410.0 2 Shed M2 32 239.1 7.651.0 3 Willow Piece 12-25cm 2.0 600.0 4 Poplar Piece 3-50cm 2.0 300.0 5 Pear Piece 1-25cm 120.0 120.0

TOTAL: 16.081.0



The cost of population resettlement: Abdurahmonov Akmal No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 100 114.0 11.400.0 2 Mulberry Piece 2-60cm 120.0 240.0 3 Poplar Piece 20-25cm 2.0 1000.0 4 Pear Piece 5-20cm 120.0 600.0 5 Willow Piece 4-30cm 2.0 240.0 6 Nut wood Piece 1-80cm 120.0 120.0 7 Apple Piece 1-20cm 120.0 120.0 8 Apricot Piece 1-50cm 120.0 120.0

TOTAL: 13.840.0



Page 51 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Mullokenja Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Davlatova Shahrikhon No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 63 114.0 7182.0 2 Poplar Piece 64-8cm 2.0 1.024.0 3 Poplar Piece 12-30cm 2.0 720.0 4 Willow Piece 1-30cm 2.0 60.0 5 Pear Piece 1-20cm 120.0 120.0 6 Apricot Piece 4-20cm 120.0 120.0

TOTAL: 9.226.0


Tajikabad Region Mullokenja Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Izatova Nakhtiya No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 48 114.0 5.472.0 2 Poplar Piece 4-30cm 2.0 240.0 3 Nut wood Piece 2-20cm 120.0 240.0 4 Willow Piece 7-30cm 2.0 420.0 5 Pear Piece 5-15cm 120.0 600.0 6 Apricot Piece 4-20cm 120.0 4800.0 7 Apple Piece 10-15cm 12.0 1200.0 8 Peach Piece 3-10cm 12.0 360.0

TOTAL: 9.012.0



Page 52 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Saedkhojaev Dovudkhon No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 45 114.0 5.130.0 2 Poplar Piece 1-20cm 2.0 40.0 3 Shed M2 35 239.1 8.368.0 4 Storage M2 4 239.1 956.0 5 Poplar Piece 2-15cm 2.0 60.0 6 Willow Piece 1-50cm 2.0 100.0 7 Willow Piece 6-20cm 2.0 240.0 8 Pear Piece 2-15cm 120.0 240.0 9 Apricot Piece 2-20cm 120.0 240.0 10 Apple Piece 8-20cm 120.0 960.0

TOTAL: 16.334.0



The cost of population resettlement: Faromarzov Askhuja No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 76 114.0 8.664.0 2 Shed M2 4 239.1 956.0 3 Poplar Piece 8-15cm 2.0 240.0 4 Apple Piece 24-10cm 120.0 2.880.0

TOTAL: 12.740.0



Page 53 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Saedkhojaev Emom No. Description measurement


1 Shed M2 90 239.1 21.519.0 2 Poplar Piece 6-60cm 2.0 720.0 3 Willow Piece 10-43cm 2.0 860.0



The cost of population resettlement: Shodiev Karim, School #10 No. Description measurement


1 Steel fence M2 100 6.0 600.0 2 Poplar Piece 130-20cm 2.0 5.200.0 3 Willow Piece 7-15cm 2.0 210.0 4 Nut wood Piece 1-20cm 120.0 120.0 5 Apple Piece 20-10cm 120.0 2.400.0



The cost of population resettlement: Saedkhojaev Davlatpocho No. Description measurement



TOTAL: 2.144.0 1. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 2. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 3. Sharipov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 4. Zoerov H – Chief of DEU (RMU):


Page 54 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) NAVOBOD VILLAGE

No. Name shed shelter steel net

RCC fence stotage

clay fence poplar willow pear

nut wood apple apricot dates mulberry cherry

AP signautre

1 M.Rasulov 6х4m 83m 80No -15cm

70No- d35cm

Mullo

2 A.Ismoilov 5х9m 24х2,5 х0,4m

34No --d20cm

5No— d12cm 3No--d10cm

3 O.Mirzoeva 6х5m 5х4м 16х2,5 х0,4m

2No -d20см

1No— d50cm

1,5х2,5 х0,4m

4 A.Sharipov 8х10m 10,5х6m 3,5х1,5m 70No --d20cm

1No— d30cm

conc. found. 1.5m

conc. found. 1.5m

conc. found. .1.5m

2No— d40cm

6х6m

conc. found. 1.5m

5 T.Shoh mahmadov 3х5m

38х2,5 х0,4m

45No --d20cm 1No-d30cm 5No--d20см 5No--d15cm

6 S.Ismoilova 5х6m 61х2,5 х0,4m

12No- -d12cm

2No— d30cm 3No-т-d20см

7 S.Sharipov

A.Gafurova 51х2,5 х0,4m

40No --d26cm

10No— d0cm 7No--d25см

8 S.Rasulov 36х2,5 х0,4m

25No --d15cm

30No— d40cm 12No--d10cm

9 R.Rasulov 6х4m 3х4m 54х2,5 х0,4m

20No --d20cm 60No--d10cm

маг.4,5 х9m

80No --d10cm

10 M.Ismoilov 56х2,5 х0,4m

25No --d20cm

15No— d20cm 1No--d10cm 1No--d10cm 4No--d15cm 4No--10cm

2No--15cm

11 S.Ismoilov 53х2,5 х0,4m

11No --d11cm 2No--d12cm 5No--d15см


Page 55 URSP-2

12 N.Ismoilov 7No— d15cm 12No-d15cm

13 I.Isroilov 7No— d15cm 11No-d15cm


Page 56 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Package 2, KM217 – KM242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project, Phase 3



NAVOBOD VILLAGE 1 Rasulov Mahmadi Sharifovich 21.628.0 2 Ismoilov Abdullo Saedvalievich 14.975.0 3 Mirzoeva Oisha Jalolovna 16.590.0 4 Sharipov Ayub 39.832.0 5 Shomhamadov Tohir Sharipovich 10.993.0 6 Ismoilov Sunat Saedvalievich 14.895.0 7 Gafurova Aftobkhon 15.815.0 8 Rasulov Sulaimon Muhiddinovich 8.694.0 9 Rasulov Rahmon Muhiddinovich 39.777.0 10 Ismoilov Mahmadali Saedvalievich 9.424.0 11 Ismoilov Saivali 7.124.0 12 Ismoilov Nazrvali Nuralievich 1.650.0 13 Isroilov Ikromuddin Nazriddinovich 1.580.0

TOTAL: 202.977.0

1. Sodiqov A –Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Rasht District:- 2. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 3. Rajabov M – Director of Pv.Ltd «Sadoe Umed»:- 4. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 5. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 6. Ramazonov Z– Head of Nushor Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Region Navobod Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Rasulov Mahmadi No. Description measurement


1 Shelter M2 24 239.1 5.738.0 2 Steel net fence M2 124.5 69.0 8.590.0 3 Willow Piece 70-35cm 2.0 4.900.0 4 Poplar Piece 80-15cm 2.0 2.400.0



Page 57 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Navobod Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Ismoilov Abdullo No. Description measurement


1 Shed M2 45 239.1 10.759.0 2 Clay fence M2 24 114.0 2.736.0 3 Willow Piece 5-12cm 2.0 120.0 4 Poplar Piece 34-20cm 2.0 1.360.0

TOTAL: 14.975.0



The cost of population resettlement: Mirzoeva Oisha No. Description measurement


1 Shed M2 30 239.0 7.173.0 2 Shop M2 20 362.1 7.242.0 3 Clay fence M2 17.5 114.0 1.955.0 4 Poplar Piece 2-20cm 2.0 80.0 5 Willow Piece 1-50cm 2.0 100.0



Page 58 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Sharipov Ayub No. Description measurement


1 Shed M2 80 114.0 9.120.0 2 Concrete foundation M2 27 60.0 1.620.0 3 Shed M2 36 239.1 8.607.0 4 Concrete foundation M2 18 60.0 1.080.0 5 Shelter M2 63 239.1 15.063.0 6 Concrete foundation M2 24.7 60.0 1.482.0 7 Poplar Piece 70-20cm 2.0 2.800.0 8 Willow Piece 1-30cm 2.0 60.0

TOTAL: 39.832.0



The cost of population resettlement: Shomhamadov Tohir No. Description measurement


1 Shelter M2 15 239.1 3.541.0 2 Clay fence M2 38 114.0 4.332.0 3 Poplar Piece 45-20cm 2.0 1.800.0 4 Apricot Piece 1-30cm 120.0 120.0 5 Mulberry Piece 5-20cm 120.0 600.0 6 Cherry Piece 5-15cm 120.0 600.0



Page 59 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Ismoilov Sunat No. Description measurement


1 Shelter M2 30 239.1 7.173.0 2 Clay wall M2 61 114.0 6.954.0 3 Willow Piece 2-30cm 2.0 120.0 4 Poplar Piece 12-12cm 2.0 120.0 5 Mulberry Piece 3-20cm 120.0 360.0

TOTAL: 14.895.0



The cost of population resettlement: Gafurova Aftobkhon No. Description measurement


1 Shed M2 45 239.1 10.759.0 2 Clay fence M2 24 114.0 2.736.0 3 Willow Piece 5-12cm 2.0 120.0 4 Poplar Piece 34-20cm 2.0 1.360.0 5 Mulberry Piece 7-25cm 120.0 840.0

TOTAL: 15.815.0



Page 60 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Rasulov Sulaimon No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 36 114.0 4.104.0 2 Willow Piece 30-40cm 2.0 2.400.0 3 Poplar Piece 25-15cm 2.0 750.0 4 Cherry Piece 12-10cm 120.0 1440.0

TOTAL: 8.694.0



The cost of population resettlement: Rasulov Rahmon No. Description measurement


1 Shed M2 24 239.1 5.738.0 2 Shop M2 40.5 362.1 14.665.0 3 Shelter M2 12 239.1 2.868.0 4 Clay wall M2 54 114.0 6.156.0 5 Poplar Piece 25-15cm

20-20cm 80-10cm

2.0 2.0 2.0

750.0 800.0 1.600.0

6 Cherry Piece 60-10cm 120.0 7.200.0 TOTAL: 39.777.0



Page 61 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Ismoilov Mahmadali No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 56 114.0 6.384.0 2 Willow Piece 15-20cm 2.0 600.0 3 Poplar Piece 25-20cm 2.0 1.000.0 4 Pear Piece 1-10cm 120.0 120.0 5 Nut wood Piece 1-10cm 120.0 120.0 6 Apple Piece 4-15cm 120.0 480.0 7 Cherry Piece 4-10cm 120.0 480.0 8 Cherry Piece 2-15cm 120.0 240.0

TOTAL: 9.424.0



The cost of population resettlement: Ismoilov Saedvali No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 53 114.0 6.042.0 2 Poplar M2 11-11cm 2.0 242.0 3 Dates Piece 2-12cm 120.0 240.0 4 Mulberry Piece 5-15cm 120.0 600.0

TOTAL: 7.124.0



Page 62 URSP-2


The cost of population resettlement: Ismoilov Nazarvali No. Description measurement


1 Willow M2 7-15cm 2.0 210.0 2 Dates Piece 12-15cm 120.0 1.440.0

TOTAL: 1.650.0



The cost of population resettlement: Ismoilov Ikromuddin No. Description measurement


1 Willow M2 7-15cm 2.0 210.0 2 Dates Piece 11-15cm 120.0 1.320.0

TOTAL: 1.530.0



Page 63 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) KICHIKZI VILLAGE No. Name clay fence shelter date willow AP signature

1 Davlyaytov

Adham 56х2,5х0,4m 19No.-d20cm 2 Taibov Ismon 57х2,5х0,4m 12No.-d20cm 3 Salimova Rafoat 159х2,5х0,4m 2х4m 10No.-d15сcm 8No.-d20cm 4 Maksudov Kamar 127х2,5х0,4

Tajikabad Region Package 2, KM 217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Carridor Imrovement Project, Phase 3


KICHIKZI VILLAGE


TOTAL: 48.246.0

1. Sodiqov A –Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Rasht District:- 2. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 3. Rajabov M – Director of Pv.Ltd «Sadoe Umed»:- 4. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Employee:- 5. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 6. Ramazonov Z– Head of Nushor Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Region Kichikizi Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Davlatov Adham No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 56 114.0 6.384.0 2 Willow Piece 19-20cm 2.0 760.0



Page 64 URSP-2

(Annex-1 contd…) Tajikabad Region Kichikizi Village Phase-3, Package-2

The cost of population resettlement: Taibov Ismon No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 57 114.0 6.498.0 2 Willow Piece 12-20cm 2.0 480.0

TOTAL: 6.978.0



The cost of population resettlement: Salimova Rafoat No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 159 114.0 18.126.0 2 Willow M2 8-20cm 2.0 320.0 3 Dates Piece 10-15cm 120.0 1.200.0

TOTAL: 19.646.0



The cost of population resettlement: Maqsudov Qamar No. Description measurement


1 Clay fence M2 127 114.0 14.478.0 TOTAL: 14.478.0



Page 65 URSP-2

Annex-1A Amended Compensation Payment Details Tajikabad Rayon Package 2, km217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project, Phase 3


No Name Amount

KAPALI VILLAGE 1 Safarov Abdulvohid Toshmatovich 1.231.0 2 Odinaev Muhammadtohir Fathuddinovich 18.655.0 3 Safarov Mirzo Sangakovich 1.368.0 4 Sharipov Bakhtiyor Mahmadyorovich 3.440.0

SUBTOTAL: 24.694.0

7. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 8. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- 9. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 10. Shifoev L – Head of Kalayi-labi-ob Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Rayon Package 2, km217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project, Phase 3


No Name Amount

MAZORI SHING VILLAGE 1 Salimova Kizdarkhon Karimovna 6.498.0 2 Sharipov Zarif 6.150.0 3 Mahmudov Tojiddin Homidjonovich 10.993.0 4 Abdurahmonov Mansur Majidovich 4.332.0 5 Rajabov Mumin Mulojonovich 2.052.0 6 Salomov Dilshod Mahmadovich 5.130.0 7 Maqsudova Azizpocho Rajabovna 3.703.0 8 Junaidov Hikmatullo 3.192.0 9 Mahmudov Yusufjon Mahmadjonovich 3.618.0 10 Odinaeva Gulandom Khudoyorovna 2.850.0 11 Salomov Khandullo Gafurovich 5.084.0

SUBTOTAL: 53.602.0

1. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 2. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- 3. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 4. Toshev N – Head of Shogadoev Jamoat:-


Page 66 URSP-2

Tajikabad Rayon Package 2, km217 –242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project, Phase 3


No Name Amount

MULLOKENJA VILLAGE 1 Saedkhojaeva Davlatpocho Faromarzovna 1.824.0 2 Sadirov Mahmadsoleh Davlatyorovich 3.921.0 3 Sadirov Mahmadnabi Davlatyorovich 19.896.0 4 Shoev Umar Mahmadkhojaevich 9.721.0 5 Satorov Subhuddin Gaforovich 15.061.0 6 Abdurahmonov Akmal Karimdodovich 11.400.0 7 Davlatova Shahrikhon Shodievna 7.182.0 8 Izzatova Nakhtiya 5.472.0 9 Saedkhojaev Dovutkhon Faromarzovich 14.694.0 10 Falomarzov Askhuja 9.620.0 11 Saedkhojaev Emom Askarovich 21.519.0 12 Shodiev Karim 600.0

SUBTOTAL: 120.980.0

7. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 8. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- 9. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 10. Toshev N – Head of Shogadoev Jamoat:-


Page 67 URSP-2

Tajikabad Region Package 2, km217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project, Phase 3

Resettlement of population (affected) No Name Amount

NAVOBOD VILLAGE 1 Rasulov Mahmadi Sharifovich 5.738.0 2 Ismoilov Abdullo Saedvalievich 13.495.0 3 Mirzoeva Oisha Jalolovna 14.415.0 4 Sharipov Ayub 36.972.0 5 Shomhamadov Tohir Sharipovich 7.873.0 6 Ismoilov Sunat Saedvalievich 14.127.0 7 Gafurova Aftobkhon 13.495.0 8 Rasulov Sulaimon Muhiddinovich 4.104.0 9 Rasulov Rahmon Muhiddinovich 16.312.0 10 Ismoilov Mahmadali Saedvalievich 6.384.0 11 Ismoilov Saivali 6.042.0

SUBTOTAL: 138.957.0

7. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 8. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- 9. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 10. Ramazonov Z– Head of Nushor Jamoat:-

Tajikabad Region Package 2, km217 – 242 Nimich – Sayron under CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project, Phase 3


No Name Amount

KICHIKZI VILLAGE 49 Davlatov Adhamjon 6.384.0 50 Taibov Ismon 6.498.0 51 Salimova Rafoat Kirgizovna 18.126.0 52 Maqsudov Qamar Muzafarovich 14.478.0

SUBTOTAL: 45.486.0

1. Eshonov Kh – Chief of construction and planning department of Tajikabad:- 2. Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- 3. Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):- 4. Ramazonov Z– Head of Nushor Jamoat:-


Page 68 URSP-2

Annex -2 Minutes of the Meeting The minutes of meeting Date: 23 – July 2009 Location: Tajikabad Regional Center Members: Ramazonov Z – Head of Nushor Jamoat Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU)

Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff Eshonov H – Chief of construction department Mirzoev M – PIU Resettlement Specialist Avzalshoev B – Deputy Resident Engineer

Kapali village residents: Odinaev Mahmadtohir Safarov Mirzo Mazori-shing village residents: Sharipov Zarif Salimova Kizdarkhon Salomov Khandullo Mahmudov Tojiddin Navobod village residents: Sharipov Ayub Ismoilov Abdullo Rasulov Rahmon Mullo-kenja village residents: Shoev Umar Sadirov Mahmadsoleh Sadirov Mahmadnabi Kichikzi village residents:Maqsudov Qamar

Agenda: Record and awareness of the households

affected by demolition under road rehabilitation project Presented: Deputy Resident Engineer – Avzalshoev Baktiyor, explained where the road centerline will be and which households would be under demolition. Presented: Kapali village resident – Odinaev Mahmadtoher, queried re compensation for his clay fence. Responded: PIU Resettlement Specialist – Mirzoev M, clarified that there will be compensation for demolition of clay fence and other structures. Presented: Navobod village resident – Sharipov Ayub, queried re compensation for trees. Responded: Mirzoev M, clarified that compensation for trees is allowed, but after payment of compensation the cut trees will be handed over to DEU for distribution between schools, hospitals and other offices.


Page 69 URSP-2

(Annex-2 contd…) All meeting members have requested and decided not have the payment for trees as village residents themselves will use their cut trees as contsruction materials and firewood. There are no any complains and they express their appreciation for road construction. Signatures: Ramazonov Z – Head of Nushor Jamoat:- Sharipov B – Chief Accountant of DEU (RMU):-

Shiripov K – Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau Staff:- Eshonov H – Chief of construction department- Mirzoev M – PIU Resettlement Specialist:- Avzalshoev B – Deputy Resident Engineer:-

Kapali village residents: Odinaev Mahmadtohir:- Safarov Mirzo:- Mazori-shing village residents: Sharipov Zarif:- Salimova Kizdarkhon:- Salomov Khandullo:- Mahmudov Tojiddin:- Navobod village residents: Sharipov Ayub:- Ismoilov Abdullo:- Rasulov Rahmon:- Mullo-kenja village residents: Shoev Umar:- Sadirov Mahmadsoleh:- Sadirov Mahmadnabi:- Kichikzi village residents:Maqsudov Qamar:-


Page 70 URSP-2

(Annex-2 contd…) List of the Resettlement rates for Tajikabad Rayon

Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau A. Sodiqov

Certificate

This Certificate has been issued to confirm that these rates have been prepared in accordance with the Decree-1986 and 2005-2008 price indices. This certificate is issued to whom it may concern. Director of Inter-district Technical Inventory Bureau of Rasht A. Sodiqov

No Description of works Measurement unit

Unit rate (Somoni)

Justification

1. Wattle and daub residential house m2 239.1 Manual on Estimating

2. Nonresidential premise m2 Standards Part 1 & 2

Shed, shelter, storehouse m2 239.1 Order on indices

3. Clay fence m3 114 dated 10.03.2005 4. Wooden fence m2 12.96 113/13 5. Poplar cm 2.0 calculation 6. Willow cm 2.0 --//-- 7. Mulberry pcs/t 60 --//-- 8. Peach pcs/t 60 --//-- 9. Walnut pcs/t 60 --//-- 10. Apple pcs/t 120 --//-- 11. Pears and other fruit

trees pcs/t 120 --//--


Page 71 URSP-2

Annex-3 Public Complaints Resolving Process ADB Loan 2359-TAJ: CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project Package 1 and 2 Public Complaints Resolving Process Public Complaints: During the recent site visit it was observed that there were a multitude of public complaints resulting from construction activities undertaken by the contractors. Some of these were not related to project activities while others required simple but urgent action by the contractor. In many instances the affected community had no way of seeking redress as there is no mechanism of recording and resolving complaints. The following complaint resolving mechanism is proposed to address this. A register/data base of complaints will be maintained by the DRE of each package with assistance from the contractor. PIU will maintain a database of complaints of both package 1 and 2. All complaints will be directed to the Contractor/DRE and DRE will check that all complaints are recorded. All public complaints and action taken will be included in the environmental monitoring report under the relevant heading. Format for registering public complaints:

Further Action

Feed back

Comp

laint

No

Location Complainant Nature of Complaint

Action taken Date

Actio

n by

Date

Sent

to

Date

Complaints requiring immediate solutions as disruption to irrigation or drinking water, or power supply will be immediately attended to by the contractor in consultation with the DRE. The complainants will be notified of the action taken. Complaints that cannot be resolved at the contractor/DRE level will be taken up at monthly meetings of the Public Complaints Committee. Public Complaints Committee: The Public Complaints Committee (PCC) will be convened by the PIU representative monthly at the respective DRE office. PIU representative will chair the meetings while the other members of the PCC will be the DRE, national Resettlement and Environmental Specialists of Construction Supervision Consultant, Contractor’s Representative and Contractor’s Environmental Specialist and community/NGO representatives who will be co-opted as required. The quorum for meetings will be decided at the inaugural meeting. The national Resettlement Specialist of the Construction Supervision Consultant will be instrumental in establishing the committee. The PIU representative will maintain records/minutes of the meeting. DRE will inform the complainant of the decisions taken at the monthly meetings. Complaints that cannot be resolved at the PCC will be directed to the MOTC for required action at Ministerial level. PIU representative will track such complaints and record and inform the complainant of the action taken by MOTC.


Page 72 URSP-2

Annex-4: Resettlement Monitoring Framework ADB Loan 2359-TAJ: CAREC Regional Road Corridor Improvement Project Package 1 and 2 Resettlement Monitoring Framework 1. Objectives This frame work is to develop an approach and mechanism to monitor the implementation of the social impact mitigation and resettlement plan. The objectives of the monitoring are to track progress and evaluate adequacy and efficacy of the implementation of the resettlement plan. The process of achieving these objectives will assist in resolving issues, and enhance collaboration with project affected persons (PAPs) in meeting challenges and planning actions to deliver solutions to identified problems and make recommendations that will enhance the effectiveness of the resettlement plan implementation. The monitoring process will also identify gaps, weaknesses and issues early and thereby facilitate appropriate intervention to address these. Implementation monitoring usually involves:

assessing whether the implementers have completed the action called for (e.g., paying compensation for damaged assets);

was the action done as per requirements (was the compensation adequate and timely); is the action continuing;

And data gathered from implementation monitoring can be aggregated to report the resettlement program’s action accomplishments 2. Processes The monitoring process will be facilitated through positive working relationships and honest and open communication with PAPs, and positive feedback and constructive criticism on the implementation program. The Monitoring process will:

involve consultations/meeting and discussion between the monitoring committee members and the PAPs;

be undertaken in an open and transparent manner in keeping with participatory approach; discuss issues that relate to items on the list of indicators;

3. Roles and Responsibilities The PAPs have the right to:

be heard in an open minded manner have adequate opportunity openly to express issues and concerns

The monitoring committee is responsible for:

providing prior notice to PAPs of the consultations clearly articulating the evaluating process maintaining a solution-focused approach

4. Methodology To conduct the monitoring a social impact management committee (SIMC) consisting of representatives from PIU, Rayonel/local administration, and NGOs in the area will be appointed with the representative of the PIU as the convenor. This committee will be responsible for management and monitoring of social impact mitigation/implementation of resettlement plan.

Ground level resettlement monitoring will be carried out by the Resettlement Officer of the PIU with representatives from Rayonel/Hukumat administration, MBTI and local NGOs. In addition to


Page 73 URSP-2

(Annex-3 contd…)

verifying the information furnished under monitoring contents in the Short Resettlement Plan (Cardno-Acil/MOTC: June 2007) and monitoring in relation to the Implementation Schedule (Table 6) in the Updated Short Resettlement Plan (Cardno-Acil/MOTC: August 2008) this committee will visit households on a monthly basis over the project implementation period and three successive months following the completion of package 2 and package 1 construction activities to:

gather qualitative indications of the social and economic impact of project implementation on the respective households. (For example, what has been their experience of project resettlement implementation? In retrospect, do they feel the process was fair and equitable? Did they have and/or do they still have grievances? If so, what is their experience of the grievance redress procedure? How might improvements be made?);

suggest modification in the implementation procedures of the RP, as required, so as to up-grade performance in achieving project policy objectives

Participatory consultation will be the main tool used in the monitoring/data gathering process.

5. Indicators The following indicators will be used in the monitoring exercise:

Mitigation of adverse effects as blocked access to houses/business places, social infrastructure etc.;

Adequacy of alternate accesses and alternate sites provided; Impact on female headed and vulnerable families and disadvantaged PAPs;.

The payment of compensation: payments made to all affected households/properties before project implementation;

The adequacy of the method for determining valuation and compensation for assets (crops and trees, and buildings) and/or incomes;

The sub-project (package 1, package 2) age of resettlement and construction: respective resettlement activities should be completed at least one month before the start of associated physical works.

Restoration of economic activities: affected persons should be monitored for restoration of income earning capacity and production levels.

Level of satisfaction: (i) the level of satisfaction of affected households evaluated and recorded; (ii) the operation of the mechanisms of grievance redress and the speed of redress of grievances

Potential conflict situations 6. Frequency The monitoring will commence before construction and will continue till end of construction and for a short period after construction. Quarterly reports will be submitted to the MOTC on the monitoring survey/public consultation findings. SIMC with the assistance of the CSC will initiate remedial action if and when required.

7. Resources The field level monitoring of the Resettlement Plan (RP) implementation may be conducted through a monitoring team appointed as described in section 4 above. The Resettlement Officer of the PIU will lead the monitoring activities and will be responsible for establishing the ground level monitoring team, monthly reporting and follow up action. A quarterly report will be prepared for MOTC/ADB.


Page 74 URSP-2

(Annex-3 contd…) Allocation under Land Acquisition and Resettlement Management and M&E Activities will be used for funding the monitoring activities. The Resettlement Specialist of CSC will provide guidance and required on-field training to the monitoring team. 8. Outcome The Resettlement Officer of the PIU will maintain a database on the implementation and monitoring activities. This database will include information tables with detailed resettlement implementation data and compliance with Tajikistan Land Code/ADB Policy.

taj: carec regional road corridor improvement projectcarec regional road corridor improvement...

Documents