tamil nadu electricity regulatory commission orders/2020/daily order-06-10-2020...2020/10/06 ·...

TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (Constituted under Section 82 (1) of the Electricity Act, 2003

Central Act 36 of 2003)

PRESENT:-

Thiru.M.Chandrasekar .... Chairman Dr.T.Prabhakara Rao …. Member

and Thiru.K.Venkatasamy …. Member (Legal)

D.R.P.No.68 of 2014

M/s.Dattatreya Textiles Pvt. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv. Rahul Balaji)

Versus

TANGEDCO & Ors. ….. Respondent (Adv.M.Gopinathan) Hearing dated : 06-10-2020

DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate appeared for the petitioner and informed that the

case before the Supreme Court of India has not been listed since March 2020 and he

prayed to list this matter after two months. Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for

TANGEDCO appeared. At the request of the petitioner side, the case is adjourned to

05-01-2021 for reporting the status of the case which is pending before the Supreme

Court.

(Sd................) (Sd............) (Sd........) (K. Venkatasamy) (T.Prabhakara Rao) (M.Chandrasekar) Member (Legal) Member Chairman

//True Copy//

Secretary

Tamil Nadu Electricity

Regulatory Commission



PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.69 of 2014

M/s.Sundaram Textiles Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv. Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate appeared for the petitioner and informed that the

case before the Supreme Court of India has not been listed since March 2020 and he

prayed to list this matter after two months. Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for

TANGEDCO appeared. At the request of the petitioner side, the case is adjourned to

05-01-2021 for reporting the status of the case which is pending before the Supreme

Court.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M.P.No.20 of 2020

M/s.Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association(TASMA) ….. Petitioner (Adv.R.S.Pandiyaraj)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.S.P.Parthasarathy, Advocate appeared for the petitioner.

Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO and sought short

time for filing counter. At the request of the respondent side, the case is adjourned to

20.10.2020 for filing counter on the admissibility of the petition.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.13 of 2020

M/s.Rajaguru Spinning Mills Pvt. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.S.Venkatesan)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.S.Venkatesan, Advocate appeared for the petitioner. Thiru.M.Gopinathan,

Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared. Counter filed. The case is adjourned to

03.11.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.14 of 2020


Versus


DAILY ORDER





//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.15 of 2020


Versus


DAILY ORDER





//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M.P.No.25 of 2020

M/s.Ramnad Renewable Energy Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv. Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate appeared for the petitioner. Thiru.M.Gopinathan,

Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared and sought time for filing counter. At the

request of the respondent side, the case is adjourned to 20.10.2020 for filing counter.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M.P.No.26 of 2020

M/s.Kamuthi Solar Power Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv. Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared and sought time for filing counter. At the

request of the respondent side, the case is adjourned to 20.10.2020 for filing counter.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-

Thiru M.Chandrasekar .... Chairman Dr.T.Prabhakara Rao …. Member

and Thiru. K.Venkatasamy …. Member (Legal)

R.A.No.3 of 2020

i) Ind-Bharat Power Gencome Limited ii) OPG Power Generation Pvt. Limited iii) The Madras Aluminium Co. Limited ….. Petitioners

(Adv.Rahul Balaji) Versus

TANGEDCO & Ors. ….. Respondents (Adv.M.Gopinathan) Hearing dated : 06-10-2020

DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate appeared for M/s.OPG Power Generation Pvt. Limited (P-2) and M/s.MALCO Ltd (P-3). Thiru.Deva Dakshan, Advocate from M/s.Shree Law Services appeared for M/s.Ind-Bharath Power Gencom Limited (P-1) and sought a week’s time for filing counter. Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared. Meanwhile, Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate prayed the Commission to consider M/s.OPG Power Generation Limited’s counter and make determination on the issue involved and need not await for filing of counter affidavits from the other petitioners. Commission directed M/s.Ind-Bharath Power Gencom Limited (P-1) to file counter affidavit before 13.10.2020. At the request of the petitioners’ side, the case is adjourned to 20.10.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.9 of 2019

M/s.Aquasub Engineering ….. Petitioner (Adv.Arun Anbumani)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.N.L.Rajah, Senior Advocate appeared for the petitioner.

Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared. Rejoinder along

with annexures filed by the petitioner. At the request of the both sides, the case is

adjourned to 20.10.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M.P.No.22 of 2020

CE/Commercial, TANGEDCO ….. Petitioner (Adv.M.Gopinathan) Hearing dated : 06-10-2020

DAILY ORDER

Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared and submitted that

the stakeholders comments have been received and the remarks will be submitted in

the next hearing. Arguments of Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate and

Thiru.S.P.Parthasarathy, Advocate heard. The case is adjourned to 01.12.2020 for

further hearing. Meanwhile, Commission issued the following directions to

TANGEDCO.

The licensee to conduct sample measurements at Industries duly following the

guidelines as mentioned below.

i) Measurements shall be made at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) at the HV

SIDE or the LV SIDE as the case may be as cited in the IEEE 519-2014.

ii) The short circuit current at PCC and the average maximum load current (as specified

and arrived in the IEEE STANDARD) shall be furnished along with the detailed

report.

-2-

iii) The report shall contain measurement methodology, duration of measurement,

measurement of individual harmonic from 5th to 50th, for arriving the multiplier so

as to give relief in respect of the individual harmonics limited within 25% of the

values specified against the individual harmonics. All these shall be as per the CEA

Regulation read with IEEE STANDARD 519-2014.

iv) The duration of measurement shall be strictly adhered to as per IEEE STANDARD

, otherwise the current harmonic distortion value arrived by measurement may drift

from the true value and lost the precision.

v) The measurement shall be done with a class A meter which will fully (not partially)

complaint as per the specifications of both standards viz, IEC6100-4-7(edition 2.0).,

IEC 6100-4-30(Edition3.0).The existing meters may be connected in parallel and

the recordings of both the meters shall be furnished. The difference between the

measurement suggested by TANGEDCO and the CEA methodology to be studied

in detail.

vi) Measurements shall be taken at least two or more industries likely with more

harmonic generation in each voltage level of (HT)11 kv, 22 kv, 33kv, and EHT and

especially measurement at electric traction, induction and arc furnaces and

welding, IT parks, variable drive frequencies load etc., shall be done.

vii) The measurement shall be done when industry is working with a load current

nearer to maximum demand average current arrived as per the IEEE definition so as to get a real representative current harmonic distortion value

viii) The measurement shall be done in the presence of the consumer or his

authorised representative.

ix) The report shall invariably mention the period of measurement, the meter

details, like make, slno., compatibility with both the IEC STANDARDS, with its

full specifications.

x) The licensee shall be in a position to clarify any queries raised on measurement

and its report.

-3-

xi) The report shall be in hard copy (in duplicate) and all measurements and

loggings by the meter in soft form for analysis purpose.

Such a field measurement report will help the Commission to take proper decision.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-

Thiru M.Chandrasekar .... Chairman Dr.T.Prabhakara Rao …. Member

and Thiru. K.Venkatasamy …. Member (Legal)

M.P.No.2 of 2020

Tamil Nadu Energy Development Agency (TEDA) ….. Petitioner (Rep. by Thiru.Sankara Narayanan, General Manager)

Versus TANGEDCO & another ….. Respondents (Adv.M.Gopinathan) Hearing dated : 06-10-2020

DAILY ORDER

Thiru Sankara Narayanan, General Manager represented Tamil Nadu Energy

Development Agency (TEDA). Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO

appeared. Arguments heard. Orders reserved.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-


and Thiru.K.Venkatasamy …. Member (Legal) D.R.P.No.8 of 2014

M/s.India Fashions Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared and submitted that the order of the

Commission has been complied with. However, the counsel for the petitioner sought

the furnishing of details by TANGEDCO and if not, orders may be passed. The Counsel

for TANGEDCO also called out the details of certain payments. But counsel for the

petitioners insisted on filing of an affidavit. Commission directed the TANGEDCO to

make payment before 20.10.2020 and to file the memo containing the details of

payment and file compliance report. The case is adjourned to 20.10.2020 for filing

memo of compliance.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M/s.Savita Oil Technologies Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER









memo of compliance.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M/s.M.Babanna ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER









memo of compliance.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-


and Thiru.K.Venkatasamy …. Member (Legal) M.P.No.10 of 2020

M/s.Leshark Global LLP ….. Petitioner (Adv.R.S.Pandiyaraj)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.S.P.Parthasarathy, Advocate appeared for the petitioner and submitted that

the service connection has not been energized in terms of the orders of the

Commission. Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO appeared.

Commission queried the TANGEDCO on the delay and directed the presence of the

concerned Superintending Engineer before the Commission in the next hearing to

explain the delay in effecting the service connection. The case is adjourned to

13.10.2020 for seeking explanation from the concerned Superintending Engineer.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-


and Thiru.K.Venkatasamy …. Member (Legal) R.P.No.1 of 2020

in

M.P.No.8 of 2019

M/s.Navin Housing & Properties Pvt. Limited ….. Petitioner

(M/s.Stephen & Stephen Advocates Associates)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Senthil Viswarooban, Advocate from M/s.Stephen & Stephen Advocates

Associates appeared for the petitioner. Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel for

TANGEDCO informed that 20 Nos. of Service Connections have been effected and the

remaining would be effected on payment. However, the Counsel for the petitioner

disputed it. Commission directed TANGEDCO to file the details of the applications

received and no. of service connections effected. The case is adjourned to 13.10.2020

for filing affidavit.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



M/s.Sree Rengaraj Ispat Industries Pvt. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Rahul Balaji, Advocate appeared for the petitioner.

Thiru.S.P.Parthasarathy, Advocate appeared for M/s.DSRM Pvt. Limited one of the

respondent and sought time for filing counter. The case is adjourned to 27.10.2020 for

filing counter by M/s.DSRM Pvt. Limited.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.27 of 2013

M/s.Techno Electric & Engg. Co. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. It is agreed by both sides that in view of

the non-availability of the Learned Additional Advocate General, the matter may be

adjourned. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 27.10.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.46 of 2014

M/s.Techno Electric & Engg. Co. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. It is agreed by both sides that in view of

the non-availability of the Learned Additional Advocate General, the matter may be

adjourned. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 27.10.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



R.A.No.8 of 2019

i) M/s.Sutherland Global Services Pvt. Limited ii) M/s.K.G.Information Systems Pvt. Limited ….. Petitioners

(Adv.M.Venkatakrishnan for P-1 & Adv.M.A.Mudimannan for P-2)

Versus TANGEDCO & ors. ..... Respondents

(Adv.M.Gopinathan) Hearing dated : 06-10-2020

DAILY ORDER

Thiru.Kiran Manoharan, Advocate appeared for M/s.Sutherland Global Services

Pvt. Limited and Thiru.M.A.Mudimannan, Advocate appeared for M/s.K.G.Information

Systems Pvt. Limited. Thiru.M.Gopinathan, Standing Counsel appeared for

TANGEDCO. The Counsel for both 1st & 2nd petitioners sought two weeks’ time for

arguments. At the request of the petitioners’ side, the case is adjourned to 03.11.2020

for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.1 of 2015

M/s.Balkrishna Wind Energy ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. The Counsel for TANGEDCO submitted

that the petitioner has not responded the offer of settlement of interest @ 6%.

Commission directed TANGEDCO to make payment before 20.10.2020 as the amounts

are very less. The case is adjourned to 20.10.2020 for reporting compliance.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.2 of 2015

M/s.Sunil Wind Energy ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. The Counsel for TANGEDCO submitted

that the petitioner has not responded the offer of settlement of interest @ 6%.

Commission directed TANGEDCO to make payment before 20.10.2020 as the amounts

are very less. The case is adjourned to 20.10.2020 for reporting compliance.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.3 of 2015

M/s.Lanco Tanjore Power Co. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. The counsel for TANGEDCO sought

fixing of date for arguments of Learned Additional Advocate General. The case is

adjourned to 27.10.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.5 of 2015

M/s.Padmaadevi Sugars Limited ….. Petitioner (Thiru.M.V.Gangadharan, IRP)

Versus


DAILY ORDER

Thiru.M.V.Gangadharan, Interim Resolution Professional of M/s.Padmaadevi

Sugars Limited appeared and informed the Commission that the petitioner is under

liquidation . The Counsel for TANGEDCO informed that the petitioner has not shown

willingness for settlement of interest @ 6% and TANGEDCO is ready to settle the

interest @ 6%. The Interim Resolution Professional sought one week’s time for getting

instructions from the bankers. The case is adjourned to 27.10.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.14 of 2015

M/s.SKI Carbon Black (India) Pvt. Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. Rejoinder filed by the petitioner. At the

request of the petitioner side, the case is adjourned to 03.11.2020 for arguments.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.3 of 2016

M/s.Mitra Fidelity Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER


Standing Counsel appeared for TANGEDCO. It is also informed by the counsel for the

petitioner that this matter is related to D.R.P.No.68 of 2014 & D.R.P.No.69 of 2014 and

outcome of the case which is pending before the Supreme Court of India needs to be

awaited. At the request of the petitioner side, the case is adjourned to 05-01-2021 for

reporting the status of the case which is pending before the Supreme Court.


//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.4 of 2016

M/s.Greenweiz Projects Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER








//True Copy//

Secretary





PRESENT:-



D.R.P.No.5 of 2016

M/s.Tapi Energy Projects Limited ….. Petitioner (Adv.Rahul Balaji)

Versus


DAILY ORDER








//True Copy//

Secretary



tamil nadu electricity regulatory commission orders/2020/daily order-06-10-2020...2020/10/06 ·...

Documents