task-based language education:from theory to practice… and back again kris van den branden...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again
Kris Van den Branden
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
![Page 2: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TBLT on Google
Task: 275.000.000 hits Task-based: 1.320.000 hits Task-based language: 607.000 hits Task-based language teaching: 311.000 Task-based language education: 320.000
![Page 3: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“Task” as a crucial concept in…
Theories of language learning SLA research The theory and practice of language education The assessment of language proficiency/skills Real life
![Page 4: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Defining “task”
“… by ‘task’ is meant the hundred and one things people do in everyday life, at work, at play, and in between. ‘Tasks’ are the things people will tell you they do if you ask them and they are not applied linguists” (Long, 1985: 89)
![Page 5: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Target tasks and pedagogic tasks
Pedagogic tasks as increasingly complex approximations of target tasks (Long, 1996; Long and Norris, 2000)
Example: Following street directions Listen to fragments of elaborated descriptions
while tracing them on a very simple 2-D map. Virtual reality map task. Using video from the
target location and audio of the target discourse, complete a simulation of the target task.
(Long, 2007: 129)
![Page 6: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Target tasks and pedagogic tasks
Tasks should result in a kind of language use that resembles that in the outside world (Ellis, 2003) Work with three other students. You are on a
ship that is sinking. You have to swim to a nearby island. You have a waterproof container, but can only carry 20 kilos of items in it. Decide which of the following items you will take (Remember, you can’t take more than 20 kilos with you)
![Page 7: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Target tasks and pedagogic tasks
Tasks should give rise to a number of interactional and cognitive processes, believed to enhance language learning Interaction Hypothesis (Long, 1996: 451-452):
”... negotiation for meaning, and especially negotiation work that triggers interactional adjustments by the NS or the more competent interlocutor, facilitates acquisition because it connects input, internal learner capacities, particularly selective attention, and output in productive ways”
---- Jigsaw tasks/Information gap tasks
![Page 8: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Target tasks and pedagogic tasks
Output Hypothesis (Swain, 1985, 1995): production of L2 output --- collaborative speaking and writing tasks, group work/pair work
Cognitive psychology (e.g. DeKeyser, 2001; Schmidt, 1998; Robinson, 2001; Skehan, 1998; Doughty and Williams, 1998): conscious noticing and analyzing L2 forms ----- input enhancement, focus on form, error correction, explicit teaching
![Page 9: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Methodological principles for TBLT
1 Use tasks, not texts, as the unit of analysis
2 Promote learning by doing
3 Elaborate input
4 Provide rich input
5 Encourage inductive learning
6 Focus on form
7 Provide negative feedback
8 Respect learner syllabuses/develop-mental processes
9 Promote collaborative learning
10 Individualize instruction
(Doughty and Long, 2003)
![Page 10: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Two questions
1 To what extent can we expect these cleverly designed tasks to elicit the same kind of interactional work and cognitive processing in authentic classrooms?
2 To what extent do these cleverly designed tasks really promote the students’ ability to use the target language outside the classroom?
![Page 11: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Teachers working with tasks
Language teachers are “active, thinking decision-makers who make instructional choices by drawing on complex, practically-oriented, personalized, and context-sensitive networks of knowledge, thoughts and beliefs” (Borg, 2003: 81)
![Page 12: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Putting principles to work…
3 Elaborate input
4 Provide rich input
Teachers reducing task complexity, avoiding to confront learners with challenges, with things they haven’t fully acquired yet
In task-supported teaching, “tasks are seen not as a means by which learners acquire new knowledge or restructure their interlanguages but simply as a way by which learners can activate their existing knowledge of the L2 by developing fluency” (Ellis, 2003: 30)
![Page 13: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Putting principles to work
2 Promote learning by doing
8 Respect learner syllabuses/developmental processes
9 Promote cooperative/collaborative learning
Teachers’ need to maintain control
An example: Radio Tika task (cf. Berben, Van den Branden & Van Gorp, 2007)
![Page 14: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Radio Tika
- Create a radio news bulletin, using Dutch (main medium of instruction) and other languages
- 3 primary school teachers were videotaped
- Grade 6, children aged 12, multilingual classes
- Result: three different activities
![Page 15: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
L1? Topic control?
Explicit teaching?
Freedom for students
Teacher 1 No +++ No +/-
Teacher 2 No ++ Yes +
Teacher 3 Yes + No +++
Radio Tika: 3 versions
![Page 16: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Putting principles to work
6 Focus on form
7 Provide negative feedback
Poor integration of focus on form in meaningful activity
Inconsistent feedback and error correction behaviour
![Page 17: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The same task?
Teachers reconstruct a given task, based on Their cognitions on language education Their personal needs, skills, and teaching style The context in which they operate Their perceptions of their students
= Turning tasks into personal task intentions (“intended tasks”)
![Page 18: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Task motivation (Dörnyei, 2002)
Task motivation is influenced by: Learner characteristics Features of the task Learning environment Learner’s task-related beliefs
Expectancy of successful task completion (“expected task”)
Personal goal setting (“intended task”)
![Page 19: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A process-oriented model of task motivation
Preactional stage
- setting goals that are worthwhile to pursue
- perceiving the task as a reasonable challenge (goal can be reached, gap can be bridged)
Actional stage:
- maintaining task motivation through action-control processes
Postactional stage:
- evaluating past experiences
- determining future activities
(Dörnyei, 2002)
![Page 20: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
School effectiveness research
Teachers tailor their instructional practices to their perception of the academic level of the group of students.
“This refers to the concept of ‘didactic fit’: adjustment of curriculum, learning materials, method of instruction, effective learning time, assessment, etc. to the ability level of the class (Dar & Resh, 1986, 1994). In most classes, the content and pace of teaching are geared to the middle level of ability in that class. In lower classes, there is a more limited academic focus, poor use of instructional time and a reduced opportunity to learn…” ( De Fraine et al., 2002: 424)
![Page 21: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Overt and covert task activity
Underneath the actual verbal exchange lies a particularly strong current of highly personalised non-verbal mental activity: task intentions and assessments influence task activity, and vice versa
Task intentions, expectations and actions are fed by previous experiences and beliefs
One person’s task perceptions and actions can have a strong impact on interlocutors’ task perceptions and actions, and on the earning potential of the task
The need for classroom-based, process-oriented research to explore these issues
Teachers’ crucial role in TBLT
![Page 22: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
High-quality interaction
Interactional support Integrated in functional
tasks In line with student’s
task intentions Linked with students’
current behaviour, needs and level
Assigning active role to student and promoting active thinking
Differentiated
Learning is Situated
Goal-directed
Cumulative
Constructive Cognitive
Individually different(De Corte et al, 2003)
![Page 23: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Making interactional decisions
Teacher intuition estimating effect sizes:If learner(s) exhibit behaviour X, and my reaction
is Y, what will be the effect on:- the process of task performance (estimate based on analysis of ongoing process)- the product(s) coming out of task performance (based on comparison between task goals and current product)- language learning (based on knowledge of curriculum goals (target tasks) and knowledge of how language learning comes about)
![Page 24: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Training teachers
Explicit teaching won’t suffice A need for intensive and sustained support
Communication and support networks Providing teacher aids Creating favourable conditions Promoting and supporting teachers’ professional
development
![Page 25: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Teacher training
Task-based as well… Training in real operating conditions Alernating action and reflection
Cf. Van den Branden, 2006
![Page 26: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Cycle of reflection (Korthagen, 1993)
Classroom experience Reflection (detailed analysis) Raising essential aspects of current and
previous classroom experiences to consciousness
Searching for alternatives Trying new ideas out in new classroom
experiences
![Page 27: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Different worlds?
Lack of empirical research Task-based language assessment Studies of SLA/FLA in naturalistic settings
Second language studies Study abroad (foreign language students)
![Page 28: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Integrating the two worlds
Creating favourable conditions for real-world L2 use in the classroom and for building self-confidence
Training communication strategies Assignments with native speakers Integrated language learning, e.g.:
Vocational training School-based training Through the use of multimedia
![Page 29: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Conclusions
“If task-based teaching is to make the shift from theory to practice it will be necessary to go beyond the psycholinguistic rationale (…) and to address the contextual factors that ultimately determine what materials and procedures teachers choose.” (Ellis, 2003: 337).
Towards a process-oriented approach to classroom-based research and teacher training
Focus on people, on how they interact during task performance, rather than on tasks alone
![Page 30: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
References
Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2007). “We’ll see what happens.” Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in Action. Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 32-67). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwhistle, N., & Van Merriënboer, J. (eds.) (2003). Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions. Oxford: Pergamon.
De Fraine, B., J. Van Damme, & P. Onghena, (2002). Accountability of schools and teachers: what should be taken into account? In: European Educational Research Journal, 1. 403-428.
DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 137-158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 50-80.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Korthagen, F. (1993). Het logboek als middel om reflectie door a.s. leraren te bevorderen. VELON Tijdschrift, 15,
27-34 Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K.
Hylstenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77-99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Long, M. (1996), The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition, in W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of Language Acquisition. Vol. 2: Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Long, M., & Norris, J. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (ed.), Encyclopedia of language
teaching (pp. 597-603). London: Routledge.
![Page 31: Task-based language education:From theory to practice… and back again Kris Van den Branden Katholieke Universiteit Leuven kris.vandenbranden@arts.kuleuven.be](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062417/551a8e0e5503466b3a8b4dc4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
References (continued)
Robinson, P. (ed.) (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, R. (1998). The centrality of attention in SLA. In J. Brown (ed.), University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 16, 1-34. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-256). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In: G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language teaching: from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.