IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency

TCQAS

TC PROGRAMME:BEST PRACTICES MECHANISM

BP COLLECTION PROCESS -Survey Results

IAEA 2

Contents

i. Best Practices Processii. BP Collection Process - Survey Results

I. Who Submitted?

II. What Submitted?

III. Few Observations!

IV. Where Are We?

IAEA 3

1. BP Collection- Survey Results

2. BP Selection3. BP Dissemination

i. Best Practices Process:

IAEA 4

ii. BP Collection Process Survey Results

I. Who Submitted?

II. What Submitted?

III. Few Observations!

IV. Where Are We?

IAEA 5

I. Who Submitted?

A. Regions

B. Countries

C. Stakeholders

D. Gender

E. Language

IAEA 6

I. Who Submitted?

A. Regions

Regions Total = 40Africa 0Asia and Pacific 5Europe 8Latin America 26Secretariat 1

IAEA 7

I. Who Submitted?

B. Countries = 18 + Secretariat

IAEA 8

I. Who Submitted?

C. Stakeholder(s)

Stakeholders Total = 61Cooperation/ Regional Agreement Chair/ Coordinator 8Counterpart (CP) 25National Liaison Assistant (NLA) 6National Liaison Offi cer (NLO) 7National Technical Project Coordinator (NTPC) 1Other 8Project Management Offi cer (PMO) 1Section Head 1TC Regional Director 1Technical Offi cer/ TC Liaison Offi cer (TO/ TCLO) 3

13%

13%

41%

12%

10%

5%

Other: Academic Professors, Research Officers, etc.

IAEA 9

I. Who Submitted?

D. Gender

Gender Total = 61Female 29Male 32

48% 53%

Distribution almost even!

IAEA 10

I. Who Submitted?

E. Languages

Language No. of Submissions

English 37

Spanish 2

English/ Spanish 1

Total: 40

Language should not be any hindrance to any exchange of knowledge!

IAEA 11

II. What Submitted?

A. Type of Submission (joint / individual)

B. Word Count

C. Field of Activity (FoA)

D. Quality Criteria

E. Categories (generated form the key principles that are contained in the core of Best Practices in the design of TC Projects and Programmes)

IAEA 12

II. What Submitted?

A. Type of Submissions: Joint vs. Individual

30%

70%

Team work

IAEA 13

II. What Submitted?

B. Words Count

IAEA 14

II. What Submitted?

8 out of 10 FoAs

Except: Nuclear Chemistry and Radiochemistry

& Radiation Medicine & Health

C.

Unidentified: relate to Regional Agreement or to any management category in the field of BP which does not comply with any of the FoAs

IAEA 15

II. What Submitted?

D. Quality Criteria

Quality Criteria Total = 114Effectiveness 26Effi ciency 28Opportunity/others 3Ownership 13Relevance 18Sustainability 26

IAEA 16

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories Hits Rank

1. CPF/Regional Profile Process 57 03

2. PCM 123 02

3. LF Methodology 127 01

4. Coordination Arrangements 41 05

5. Regional & Interregional Cooperation 32 06

6. Partnerships 45 04

7. Project Results 19 07

IAEA 17

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total = 57Connection with the National Strategic Plan 1Country Programme Framework/ Regional Profi le Process 1Cuban Nuclear Programme 1Meeting current and emerging country or regional needs 21Meeting National Development Plan baselines 1Meeting policy and strategic requirements for cooperation and dialogue 11Other 4Supporting medium term development objectives 17

IAEA 18

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total = 123Eff ective leadership, ensuring quality design, and effi cient project implementation 17Evaluation 15Implementation and monitoring 24Interrelationship and continuous dialogue between diff erent stakeholders 13Interrelationships between the diff erent phases of the PCM 13Nuclear National Programme and National Projects like counterpart of technical cooperation project 1Other 1Planning, concept and project design 23Risk mitigation strategies and measurements 7Use of IT Tools (i.e. PCMF and In-Touch) in fostering collaboration and transparency 9

IAEA 19

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total = 127Comprehensiveness 12Expert Meetings 12Fellowships and Scientific Visits 12Procurement 11Project monitoring and reporting 18Regional Training Courses 14Sustainability of outputs: outreach towards end-users and beneficiaries 22System for nuclear project management in the country 1TC-PRIDE 2Use of In-Touch 9Use of PCMF 14

IAEA 20

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total = 41Coordination Arrangements 1Coordination arrangements supported by guidelines on established quality criteria, workflows, and IT structure 13Country Programme Framework 1Eff ective and effi cient management of planning and management of the TC Programme between diff erent institutions in the Member State and NLO Offi ce 1Eff ective and effi cient management of planning and management of the TC Programme between diff erent Member States entities and IAEA 24Periodical meetings among Member State Stakeholders 1

IAEA 21

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total = 32ARCAL 19Cooperative Agreements 2RCA 3Regional Project 2Technical Cooperation Programme in the European Region 6

IAEA 22

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total = 45Financial 8From the UNPD 1Strategic 17Technical 18Technical from the IAEA 1

IAEA 23

II. What Submitted?

E. Categories

Categories Total: 95Sustainability of transferred technology 20Social and Scientific Visibility of results 1Safety, environmental and/or economic result 13Project Results 1Project monitoring 1Preparation of the Team for the Nuclear Energy Plan Implementation (NEPIO), pending of government approval 1Other 2Impact on decision and policy makers 17Enhanced utilization of expertise from the developing RCA MSs 1Educational impact 19Adoption and utilization of technology by end-users 19

IAEA 24

IV. Where Are We?

The BP initiative has 13 Major Milestones!

0.Consultative Process1.Collection2.Selection3.Dissemination4.Documentation5.Main Streaming (IT Tools)

TCQAS

PCMF/In-Touch

TCDIR-TC-RDIR / RCA

4-TC Regions

Selection

DisseminationDocumentation

Start2011/2012

TC Departments/ Stakeholders

Collection

IAEA 25

IV. Where are We?

BP Selection Process:

A. Composition of the BP Selection Committee (BPSC)

B. Consolidated Document on Proposed BPs delivered to BPSC

C. Individual Assessment of Proposed BPs

D. Consolidation of Assessment Results

E. Joint Validation of the Results of Individual Assessment by BPSC

IAEA 26

IV. Where Are We?

Selection Process Date

A Composition of BP Selection Committee (BPSC) May/June 2012

B Consolidated document on Proposed BPs delivered to BPSC

July 2012

C Individual Assessment of Proposed BPs July/August 2012

D Consolidation of Assessment Results August 2012

E

Joint Validation of the Results of Individual Assessment by BPSC in a Workshop/Meeting at IAEA, Vienna Agreement on dissemination methodology

September 2012

IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency

Thank you!

Best Practices Collection Process –

Survey Results