tdec-nuatrc workshop strategic risk communication: air toxics rebecca parkin, phd, mph the george...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TDEC-NUATRC Workshop
Strategic Risk Communication:Air Toxics
Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPHThe George Washington University
Washington, DC
October 18, 2005
![Page 2: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Outline
• What is risk communication (RC)?
• Why do we need strategic RC?
• How can we assure a strategic approach?
![Page 3: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Risk Communication
• Exchange of facts and opinions among individuals, groups & organizations
• It’s not an act -- it’s a process
• Different forms meet different needs across the risk management process
![Page 4: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Decision Step
Risk Management
Risk Assessment
Risk Analysis
Problem Formulation
Initiation
Risk Evaluation
Action/ Monitoring
Preliminary Analysis
Ris
k C
omm
unic
atio
ns Risk
ManagementParadigm
(Adapted from CSA, 1997)
End
Next Step and/orTake Action
Go Back to Any Step
Risk Estimation
Risk Control
![Page 5: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Forms of Risk Communication
• One-way (tell) best for – Familiar, less complex issues– Emergencies
• Two-way (dialogue) and multi-way (groups, Internet tools) best for– Long-term issues– Unfamiliar, complex risks
![Page 6: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
How Do We Know Which RC Form To Use When?
• Knowledge of scientific literature– Risk perception– Risk communication– Stakeholders
• Scientifically obtained data & information– Stakeholders’ interests, preferences, & priorities– Contexts (e.g., cultural, social, regulatory, etc.)
• Experience with the community– Pretest methods
![Page 7: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Decision Step
Problem Formulation
Initiation
Risk Evaluation
Action/ Monitoring
Preliminary Analysis
Ris
k C
omm
unic
atio
ns Examples of
RiskCommunication
Methods
End
Next Step and/orTake Action
Go Back
Risk Estimation
Risk Control
Mass Media
CommunityTheater
Community Leaders, Advisory
Group
Public Meetings
![Page 8: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Strategic Approaches
• Systematic processes comprise– Plans – Explicit methods– Series of actions
That – Focus on essentials– Balance issues– Produce specific
results
• Typically involve– Long-term processes– Large-scale views
• Require– Visible support – Clear commitment– Dedicated resources
• Can test prototypes in advance(Emergency preparations)
![Page 9: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Key Components
• Problem definition
• Goal statement
• Context assessments
Information gathering
Resource review
• Option identification
“Best” option selection
• Implementation
• Evaluation
Much like the Risk Management Paradigm
![Page 10: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Strategic RC is Crucial ...
• The more visible the issues become
• The more variety of stakeholders involved
• The higher the stakes become
• The more complex issues become
![Page 11: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Complex, Evolving Issues
Especially require opportunities for
• Open feedback
• Ongoing interactions
• Active stakeholder involvement
As early and as often as feasible across the risk management process
![Page 12: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Air Toxics Are ComplexEveryone has to breathe
Unavoidable, concerns
Air contains toxicsUnfamiliar, confusing, overwhelming
People can’t protect themselves
Helplessness, distress, fear
People want actions from government & emitters
Low expectations, conflicts with experience & beliefs, distrust
Many parties involved in a complex process
Frustration, anger
![Page 13: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
When Government TELLS ...
• E.g., “The level of toxics in the air is too low to cause harm”
• This simple approach– Does not fit the complexity of the issue– Does not fit stakeholders’ contexts– May cause more harm than good
![Page 14: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Air Toxics RequireStrategic
RC Approaches
![Page 15: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Strategic Organizations
• Do not rely only on tactics– Do not expect “one-hit wonders”
• Do rely on comprehensive knowledge of stakeholders & contexts– Built in systematic, appropriate ways– To assure a sound basis for a RC strategy
• Do engage communities throughout the process
![Page 16: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
What Do We Need to Know?
• Which stakeholders are involved and why– Characteristics, dynamics
• Their starting points and why– Knowledge, crucial elements that are missing– Perceptions, values, beliefs, attitudes– Interests & priorities– Preferred communication processes
• Who they trust
![Page 17: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Staff Concerns
• “We don’t have enough time to involve them”– Lack of experience or negative experience– Stress related to stakeholder involvement
• Lack of training -- beyond tactics– Lack of knowledge about strategic RC
frameworks– Lack of “best practices” to draw on
![Page 18: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
What Organizations Can Do
• Assure visible senior management support
• Build understanding of what RC is
• Assure resources dedicated for effective interactions
• Provide rewards for staff engagement
• Assure effective debriefings to compile key lessons learned
![Page 19: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Answers
• How can we better educate the public?– Work and learn with them– Focus on essentials, what’s pivotal to their decision
making process
• How can we provide information that they will understand?– Assure that they have effective ways to interpret and
then use the information– Use a planned, interactive & sustained approach
![Page 20: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Key Points
• Strategic risk communication requires– More than tactics or a single event– Comprehensive, systematic approach– Based on rich knowledge
• Organizations must develop – Deeper understanding of what RC really is– Richer knowledge about stakeholders & why
they have the interests they do– Tailored RC strategies
![Page 21: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
One Last Comment ...
Despite the doubts you may have at this point,
Strategic risk communication
is feasible and
it does get easier with practice
![Page 22: TDEC-NUATRC Workshop Strategic Risk Communication: Air Toxics Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH The George Washington University Washington, DC October 18, 2005](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042718/56649f2f5503460f94c48ce0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Thank You!