teacher evaluation stakeholder meetings june 2019...teacher evaluation stakeholder meetings june...

Teacher Evaluation Stakeholder Meetings

June 2019– Bernalillo– Albuquerque– Santa Fe– Espanola– Las Vegas– Farmington– Gallup– Hobbs– Las Cruces– Deming– Ruidoso– Clovis– Inspire 2019

1

13 Stakeholder Conversations across

12 different communities

468 voices+ Inspire Conference

Presenter

Presentation Notes

The 468 participants do not include the participants at the Inspire 2019 conference

Who engaged in the conversations?

– Students– Parents or family members– Elementary Teachers– Secondary Teachers– Administrators– Tribal Representatives– Policy makers (e.g., Local Boards of Education, Government

representatives)– Higher education representatives– Business and community leaders– Advocacy groups or professional organizations

2

Meeting Process

After presenting some background information, participants gathered in role alike groups.

Then, the guiding question was provided and targeted feedback was requested.

Meeting concluded with time for open discussion, comments, and questions.

3

Presenter

Presentation Notes

The primary purpose of the Stakeholder meetings was to listen to all voices and ensure that all perspectives were accurately captured.

Key QuestionWhat does a useful teacher evaluation system need to have from your lens?

4

Consistent Themes

Evaluation should be supportive and help address the needs of our culturally and linguistically diverse students, English language learners and students with

disabilities.

5

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Our challenge is to make the need for this explicit and that it needs to be included in whatever is developed going forward like the current tool does this. Recognize the work that has been done which is integrated into the current rubric, while also indicating the need for principals and teachers to be trained on culturally and linguistically responsive teaching and learning. Current rubric states: **Any reference to “all students” includes culturally and linguistically diverse students, English learners (ELs), and students with disabilities (SWD).�**Any reference to New Mexico adopted standards includes the 2012 Amplification of WIDA English Language Development (ELD) Standards, when serving English language learners (ELLs) and Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals, when serving SWD.

Work Session #1Objectives

• Review summary of stakeholder information• Review and compare current rubric to other

models• Identify critical information as a table group• Create proposal for revision/refinement of

Observation Rubric• Share out whole group

6

Presenter

Presentation Notes

10:15 – review of agenda for work session – 2 min max Time will be built in for individuals to process/review this information prior to table group share out.

Work Session #1• Goal: Review the current Rubric for

revision/refinement

• Key Takeaway 1: Designing a Fair and Objective Evaluation System That Encourages Growth, Support, and Collaboration—Not Punishment

• Key Takeaway 2: Embracing Actionable and Meaningful Measures of Effective Teacher Practice and Professionalism

7

Presenter

Presentation Notes

10:17 – review of goal of work session -- 2 min max

Goal: Review the current Rubric for revision/refinement

8

Take 10 min to individually review the Stakeholder Summary findings as well as

the Observation Rubric Models

Presenter

Presentation Notes

10:20 – task force individuals silently review and annotate the summary findings of the stakeholder meetings as well as review the different rubric models noting any language/components that could be considered for revised rubric. Task Force members will review the current Danielson rubric and compare to Marzano’s in order to determine what elements may need to be added, revised, or eliminated


9

Share out with a partner:

What elements of the stakeholder summary stand out?

What elements or language do you find in the rubrics that may support the

revision/refinement of our current rubric?

Presenter

Presentation Notes

10:30 – 10 min max Partner share out at tables in groups of two or three. Discuss the important points found in the two documents (summary and rubrics)


10

As a table group, begin discussion around our goal. Consider these

guiding questions:

• Is there an element that is not captured in the current domains? If so, where would it fall?

• What do you like or want to keep from the current tool and the four domains?

Presenter

Presentation Notes

10:40 – 30 min max Table groups should identify a note taker to help capture the big ideas of the group as they prepare to create a poster with their recommendation.


11

As a table group, begin to develop posters that demonstrate your group’s vision of

the revision/refinement of the evaluation rubric.

Presenter

Presentation Notes

11:10 – 45 min Groups should refine and synthesize information into posters that reflect what they feel should be modified/removed/added to the current rubric. 11:55 – call groups together and explain expectation of providing feedback on posters during lunch. 1:00 – 10 min Groups will make final adjustments to posters based on feedback and prepare them for share out.

Providing feedback

During lunch please review the posters from the different groups. Use post-it notes to

leave feedback or to ask clarifying questions.

12

Presenter

Presentation Notes

12:00 – 1:00 Lunch – ask everyone to basically do a gallery walk to leave feedback or ask questions on the information contained on each poster.

Work Session #1• Goal: Review the current Rubric for

revision/refinement



13

Presenter

Presentation Notes

1:10 -- Poster share out – Each table group will have about 5-6 min to share out to the entire group the posters that were created.


• Refining the Rubric of the current Observation Tool based on information from the previous work session.

• Produce a proposed plan for transition rubric

• Provide feedback to each proposed plan

14

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:00 – review of agenda for work session – 2 min max Time will be built in for individuals to process/review this information prior to table group share out. Goal: Refining the Rubric for the Transition Observation Tool

Work Session #2• Goal: Refining the Rubric for the

Transition Observation Tool



15

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:02 – review of goal of work session -- 2 min max\ The goal of this work session is to have a usable observation tool that principals can utilize this year in evaluating and supporting their teachers.

Goal: Refining the Rubric for the Transition Observation Tool

16

As a table group, synthesize the elements from the morning work session and begin to develop a proposed observation tool.

Utilize the provided template ‘Working Session #2’ to develop draft proposal for

transition rubric

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:05 – 55 min max Utilize the provided template ‘working session #2’ to develop draft proposal for transition rubric 3:00 Break

Providing feedback

We will take 5 – 7 min to visit each table to provide feedback on the presented plan.

Please record your feedback on the provided template at each table.

17

Goal: Refining the Rubric for the Transition Observation Tool

Day 2

18

ReviewWorking session # 1 Goal: Review the current Rubric for revision/refinement

Working Session #2Goal: Refining the Rubric for the Transition Observation Tool

19

Presenter

Presentation Notes

8:00 – welcome and review of prior days work. Need to focus in on the highlights from the day and talk about the work that was accomplished Re-calibrate to what we had discussed the day before


• Review the stakeholder summary findings • Develop a recommendation for new

evaluation framework considering all elements of evaluations (Attendance, Student/Family Survey, Teacher Survey, Data, Student growth data)

20

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:00 – review of agenda for work session – 2 min max Time will be built in for individuals to process/review this information prior to table group share out.

Work Session #3• Goal: Developing Recommended

Frameworks with all Elements


• Key Takeaway 4: Differentiating Evaluation by Teacher Role and Experience

21

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:02 – review of goal of work session -- 2 min max The primary goal is the creation of a usable framework for this upcoming school year. Conversations should include all elements of evaluation frameworks (Attendance, Student/Family Survey, Teacher Survey, Data, student growth, etc)

Goal: Developing Recommended Frameworks with all Elements

22

Take 5 min to individually reflect. Consider the following:

• Key Takeaways in the Stakeholder Summary findings• Work completed yesterday on the Rubric

• Conversations from yesterday as well as conversations from today

Make note of any information that will help guide you in meeting the goal of revising the framework.

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:05– task force individuals silently review and annotate the summary findings of the stakeholder meetings.


23

Share your reflections with a partner:

What are your thoughts around the framework so far?

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:10 – 10 min max Partner share out at tables in groups of two or three. Discuss the important points found in the two documents (summary and rubrics)


24

As a table group, synthesize the discussions from yesterday as well as the the elements from this morning and begin

to develop a proposed framework.

Presenter

Presentation Notes

2:10 – 20 min max 2:30 take a break and return to this work at 2:45

teacher evaluation stakeholder meetings june 2019...teacher evaluation stakeholder meetings june...

Documents