teacher professionalism and professional …eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/54872/1/hasanpfp2015.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
i
TEACHER PROFESSIONALISM AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PRACTICES IN SOUTH SULAWESI INDONESIA
H A S A N
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
i
TEACHER PROFESSIONALISM AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PRACTICES IN SOUTH SULAWESI INDONESIA
H A S A N
A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy (Education and Development)
Faculty of Education
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
OCTOBER 2015
iii
DEDICATION
For my beloved mother
Hjh. Isa binti Umar
Who always encourages and motivates me to learn
For my beloved father Hj. Tanang bin Samuddin
Thank you for your love, pray, support, and motivation to pass the days for your
son’s success.
My beloved wife Hjh. Hasnia binti Hj. Abdul Rahman
Hopefully, we enjoy the success of this world and hereafter together.
Thanks for your encouragement, patience and understanding.
For my brothers and friends who always devote effort, prayer, patience and love
Thank you for all the kindness
Never forget for a lifetime
For my colleagues and my teachers
May God bless you all
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Alhamdulillah, I am grateful to the Almighty God for the presence of His divine
and mercy, so that I can complete this study well. I express my appreciation and
gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Baharin Abu as my supervisor for doctoral philosophy
studies that has provided guidance, encouragement and attention during the writing
of this study. Only Almighty God can reward the sacrifices.
In addition, special thanks proposed to the Governor of South Sulawesi Dr.
Hj. Syahrul Yasin Limpo, SH, M.Si., MH and also the lecturers especially to Assoc.
Prof. Dr. Yusof Boon, Dr. Mahani Mokhtar, Dr. Bambang Sumintono, Prof. Dr. Hj.
Asfah Rahman, and Prof. Dr. Baso Jabu for the support, guidance, and assistance in
enriching my academic learning throughout the PhD program.
I am extremely thankful for the ongoing support, encouragement, and
understanding of my family; my mother, Hj. Isa and my father, H. Tanang, for their
unconditional love throughout of my life, my beloved wife, Hj. Hasnia whose
unfailing love, unswerving belief in me, and enormous pride in all of my
accomplishments in this life become the bulwarks which supported me throughout
this doctoral process. My brothers Juddah, Muh. Yusuf, Arafah, and friends who
always pray, support and encourage so this study can be completed.
Finally, my thanks and appreciation to the fellow students who receive
scholarships from the government of South Sulawesi, the Government of Pangkep
Regency, and the teachers in Pangkep, Gowa, Bone, Pare-Pare, sidrap, and Pinrang
who involved in this research. My colleagues, principal and staffs at my school
SMAN 1 Bungoro Pangkep who served cooperation throughout my studying and
conducting my study.
Thank you so much
v
ABSTRACT
This study investigates professionalism and professional development
practices of secondary school teachers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Aspects of
professionalism practice studied are behaviour-attitude, pedagogical competence
and characteristics of teachers’ professional practice. In term of professional
development elements, this research has investigated effective learning activities as
well as support and constraint factors in improving teachers’ professionalism and
professional development. A total of 331 teachers were selected as respondents in
answering the questionnaires. Meanwhile, 12 teachers were selected for interviews
and observations. Survey, interview, observation, and field note were employed to
obtain data in answering research problems. The findings were analyzed by using
qualitative and quantitative methods. The results of this study showed that teachers’
pedagogical competence was at a high level. Teachers’ professional practice in the
aspects of behaviour-attitude, pedagogical competence, and learning activities were
still less effective in developing skills of teachers. Professional development
activities that should be emphasized include focus on the content, availability of
time, coherence with government’s policy, active learning of participants, and
collective participation of teachers. This study identified supporting factors needed
such as policy and government role, moral recognition, infrastructure, and finance
which were important in improving teachers’ professionalism. In addition,
constraint factors for teachers’ professionalism and professional development were
self-motivation, commitment, and availability of time to involve in learning
activities at workplace and lifelong learning. This study provides a framework for
professional teacher development in improving the practice of teachers’
professionalism and professional development in Indonesia.
vi
ABSTRAK
Kajian ini menyelidiki amalan profesionalisme dan pembangunan
profesional guru-guru sekolah menengah di Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia. Aspek
amalan profesionalisme yang dikaji adalah aspek perilaku-sikap, kompetensi
pedagogi, dan ciri-ciri amalan profesional. Bagi elemen pembangunan profesional,
kajian ini mengkaji aktiviti pembelajaran berkesan serta faktor sokongan dan
penghalang bagi meningkatkan profesionalisme dan pembangunan profesional guru.
Seramai 331 orang guru dipilih sebagai responden untuk menjawab soal selidik.
Sementara itu, 12 orang guru dipilih untuk temu bual dan pemerhatian. Kaedah
tinjauan, temu bual, pemerhatian, dan catatan lapangan digunakan bagi memperoleh
data untuk menjawab masalah kajian. Dapatan kajian dianalisis menggunakan
kaedah kualitatif dan kuatitatif. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa
kompetensi pedagogi guru berada pada tahap tinggi. Amalan profesional guru
dalam perilaku-sikap, kompetensi pedagogi, dan aktiviti pembelajaran masih kurang
berkesan dalam membentuk keterampilan guru. Aktiviti pembangunan profesional
guru yang perlu diberi penekanan merangkumi fokus kandungan, ketersediaan
masa, kesesuaian dengan polisi kerajaan, pembelajaran aktif peserta, dan penyertaan
kolektif guru-guru. Kajian ini mengenalpasti faktor-faktor sokongan yang
diperlukan adalah polisi dan peranan pemerintah, penghargaan moral, infrastruktur,
dan kewangan penting bagi meningkatkan profesionalisme guru. Di samping itu,
faktor-faktor penghalang bagi profesionalisme dan pembangunan profesional guru
adalah motivasi diri, komitmen, dan ketersediaan masa untuk terlibat dalam aktiviti
pembelajaran di tempat kerja dan sepanjang hayat. Kajian ini mencadangkan satu
kerangka untuk pembangunan guru profesional dalam meningkatkan amalan
profesionalisme dan pembangunan profesional guru di Indonesia.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES xv
LIST OF FIGURES xvii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xix
LIST OF APPENDICES xxi
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Background of Problem 5
1.3 The Needs and Challenges of Teacher
Professionalism and Professional
Development in Indonesia
12
1.3.1 Improving Teacher Professionalism
for Work Challenges
12
1.3.2 Staff Professional Development in
Professionalizing Teacher
Proficiency
16
1.4 Statement of Problem 18
1.5 Research Objectives 23
1.6 Research Questions 24
viii
1.7 Significance of the Study 24
1.8 Conceptual Framework of Study 25
1.9 Limitations of Study 27
1.10 Terms of Conceptual and Operational
Definitions
28
1.10.1 Teacher Professionalism 28
1.10.2 Behavior and Attitude 29
1.10.3 Pedagogical Competence 30
1.10.4 Learning Activities 30
1.10.5 Professional Development 31
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 32
2.1 Definitions and Concepts of Professionalism 32
2.2 Characteristics of Professional Teachers 38
2.2.1 Characters in Behavior and Attitude 39
2.2.2 Teacher Competences 44
2.2.2.1 Mastering Subject
Knowledge for Teaching
45
2.2.2.2 Mastering Pedagogical
Knowledge in Teaching
46
2.2.3 The Ethics of Professionalism 47
2.2.4 Collaborative and Collegiality 49
2.2.5 Teacher Autonomy 52
2.2.6 Self-Regulated and Reflective 54
2.3 Teacher Learning Activities 56
2.4 Teacher, Parents, and Society Role 58
2.5 The Constraints for Teachers, Parents, and
Society
59
2.6 Teacher Professional Development 60
2.7 The Need of Professional Development for
Teacher
62
2.8 Effective Professional Development 64
2.9 The Supporting for Teacher Professionalism
and Professional Development
68
ix
2.9.1 Stakeholder Policy 71
2.9.2 Moral Support 72
2.9.3 Infrastructure Support 73
2.9.4 Financial Support 73
2.10 Types of Professional Development 75
2.11 Guidelines of Professional Development 77
2.11.1 Planning 78
2.11.2 Learning 80
2.11.3 Implementing 81
2.11.4 Evaluating 81
2.12 Model of Professional Development in
Indonesia
84
2.12.1 Education and Training 84
2.12.2 Non-Educational Training 86
2.13 The Role of Professional Development
toward Teacher Professionalism
89
2.14 Models of Teacher Professional Development 90
2.14.1 Effective Professional Development
by Desimone (2009)
90
2.14.2 The Outcomes of Professional
Development by Guskey and Spark
(2002)
92
2.14.3 The Growth Process in Professional
Development by Clark and
Hollinsworth (2002)
93
2.14.4 Model of Professional Development
by Spark and Loucks-Horsley (1989)
94
2.14.5 The Standardized Professional
Development by Gaible and Burn
(2005)
94
2.15 The Researches on Teacher Professional
Development
96
2.16 Theories on Teacher Professionalism and
Professional Development
98
x
2.16.1 Constructivism Theory 98
2.16.2 Adult Learning Theory 99
2.16.3 Teacher Professionalism 100
2.16.4 Teacher Professional Development 101
2.17 Conclusion 104
3 METHODOLOGY 106
3.1 Introduction 106
3.2 The Study Research Design 106
3.2.1 The combined Paradigms 107
3.2.2 Multiple Triangulation Method 109
3.3 Research Population and Sample 111
3.3.1 Research Population 111
3.3.2 Research Sample 112
3.4 Research Instruments 115
3.4.1 Types of Instruments 115
3.4.1.1 Questionnaire 118
3.4.1.2 Interview Protocol 121
3.4.1.3 Observation 123
3.4.2 Data Quality Control 124
3.4.2.1 Validity and Reliability 124
3.4.2.2 Pilot Study 125
3.5 Method of Collecting Data 128
3.5.1 Collecting Qualitative Data 129
3.5.2 Collecting Quantitative Data 131
3.6 Analysis of Data 134
3.6.1 Qualitative Data Analysis 135
3.6.2 Quantitative Data Analysis 139
3.7 Conclusion 140
4 ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS 1
TEACHER PROFESSIONALISM PRACTICES
142
4.1 Introduction 142
4.2 Respondents’ Demographic Profile 143
xi
4.3 The Teacher’s Level of Pedagogic
Competence
145
4.4 The Characteristics of Teachers’ Professional
Practice
155
4.4.1 Teacher Professionalism in Behavior
and Attitude
155
4.4.2 Teacher Professionalism in
Pedagogical Competence
161
4.4.3 Teacher Professionalism in Learning
Activities
165
4.5 Summary of Findings 170
5 ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PRACTICES
172
5.1 Introduction 172
5.2 Professional Development Practices 173
5.2.1 Learning Activities for Continuous
Improvement
173
5.2.2 The Impacts of Learning Activities 176
5.2.3 The Effectiveness of Learning
Activities
179
5.3 The Support on Teacher Professionalism and
Professional Development
186
5.3.1 Stakeholder Policy for Teachers 187
5.3.2 Moral Support for Teachers 188
5.3.3 The Need of Infrastructures 189
5.3.4 Financial Support 191
5.4 The Constraints for Teacher Professionalism
and Professional Development
193
5.4.1 The Limitation of Time and Cost 193
5.4.2 Bureaucratic System 194
5.4.3 Self-motivation and Commitment 196
xii
5.4.4 Technology and Resources
Utilization
198
5.5 Summary and Conclusion 199
6 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
IMPLICATIONS
204
6.1 Introduction 204
6.2 Summary of Finding 205
6.2.1 The Level of Pedagogic Competence 206
6.2.2 The Characteristics of Teacher
Professionalism Practices
207
6.2.2.1 Teacher Professionalism in
Behavior and Attitude
207
6.2.2.2 Teacher Professionalism in
Pedagogic Competence
208
6.2.2.3 Teacher Professionalism in
Learning Activities
208
6.2.3 Professional Development Practices 209
6.2.3.1 Learning Activities for
Continuous Improvement
209
6.2.3.2 The Impact of Learning
Activities
210
6.2.3.3 The Effectiveness of
Learning Activities
210
6.2.4 The Supports on Teacher
Professionalism and Professional
Development
211
6.2.5 The Constraints for Teacher
Professionalism and Professional
Development
212
6.3 Discussion of Findings 213
6.3.1 Pedagogic Competences of Teachers 214
6.3.2 The Characteristics of Teacher
xiii
Professional Practices 217
6.3.3 Professional Development Practices 220
6.3.3.1 Learning Activities for
Continuous Improvement
220
6.3.3.2 The Impact of Learning
Activities
222
6.3.3.3 The Effectiveness of
Learning Activities
223
6.3.4 The Constraints for Teacher
Professionalism and Professional
Development
225
6.3.5 Summary of Discussion and
Conclusion
227
6.4 Implication of Findings 229
6.4.1 Implication for Method of Study 229
6.4.2 Implication for Theory 230
6.4.3 Implication for Practice 231
6.4.4 Recommedations for Future
Research
238
REFERENCES 240
Appendices A – M 283-301
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
3.1 The distribution of research population 112
3.2 The description of population and sample in
each regency with its schools and teachers
114
3.3 The content of questionnaires 120
3.4 The revision of questionnaire items 121
3.5 The revision of interview protocol items 122
3.6 The number of observation items 123
3.7 The summary of questionnaire’s reliability 127
3.8 Analysis method of research questions 135
4.1 Distribution of frequency and percentage of
gender
143
4.2 Distribution of frequency and percentage of
age
144
4.3 Distribution of frequency and percentage of
teaching experience
144
4.4 Distribution of frequency and percentage of
professional qualification
145
4.5 Mean score range and level of interpretation 146
4.6 The mean score of the evidence of
observation from teacher’s evaluation in
teaching
147
4.7 The average of mean score and standard
deviation of all observation aspects
150
4.8 The mean score and standard deviation of
teacher’s responds on professionalism
xv
characters in behavior and attitude 156
4.9 The mean score and standard deviation of
teacher’s responds on pedagogical
competences
162
4.10 The mean score and standard deviation of
teacher’s responds on learning activities for
continuous improvement
166
4.11 The description of professionalism practices
among secondary school teachers in South
Sulawesi
169
xvi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
1.1 The conceptual framework of the study in
investigating teacher professionalism and
professional development among secondary
school teachers
27
2.1 The Cycle of Professional Development
Activity for Teachers.
82
2.2 The kinds of fostering and developing teacher
profession
88
2.3 Professional development model by Desimone,
(2009)
91
2.4 Teacher changing process model of Guskey and
Spark (2002)
92
2.5 Teacher professional growth model (Clarke and
Hollingsworth, 2002).
93
2.6 Professional development model (Desimone,
2009)
102
2.7 Theoretical framework of teacher
professionalism and professional development
104
5.1 The aspects in teacher professionalism practice 201
5.2 The aspects of teacher professional
development practice
203
6.1 The design of teachers’ professional
development by Directorate of Education
Profession (2008)
225
6.2 The needs for teacher professionalism practice 228
xvii
6.3 The needs for teacher professionalism practices 229
6.4 The needs of teacher in enhancing
professionalism
233
6.5 Professional development for changing
teaching practice
234
6.6 The framework of professional teacher
development
235
6.7 The five dimensions of professional teacher
development
237
xviii
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
ABC - Attitude, Behavior, and Communication
ANOVA - Analysis of Variance
ATA - The Alberta Teacher s’Association
BKKBN - Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional
CPD - Continuous Professional Development
DfEE - Department of Education and Employment
eMINTS - Enhancing Missouri’s Intrictional Networked Teaching
Strategies
ETS - Educational Testing Service
GTCE-32 - General Teaching Council for England
ICT - Information and Communication Technology
IHT - In-House Training
ILO - International Labour Organization
IMA - Integrated Mahtematic Assessment
IMTPG - Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth
KKG - Kelompok Kerja Guru
KTSP - Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan
LCD - Liquid Crystal Display
LPMP - Lembaga Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan
LPTK - Lembaga Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan
MGMP - Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran
MoNE - Ministry of National Education
NBPTS - National Board for Professional Teaching Standards
NSDC - National Skill Development Corporation
NPDCI - National Professional Development on Inclusion
OECD - Organization for Economic Co-oepration and
Develoment
xix
PKG - Pusat Kegiatan Guru
P4TK - Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan
Tenaga Kependidikan
PSDMPK-PMP - Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan dan Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan
QDA - Qualitative Data Analysis
SD - Standard Deviation
SPSS - Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
STeLLA - Science Teacher Learning through Learning Analysis
TALIS - Teaching and Learning International Survey
TPD - Teacher Professional Develoment
UNATU - Uganda National Teachers Union
UNDP - United Nation Development Program
UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Organization
USAID-DBE - United States Agency for International Development-
Decentralized Basic Education
UUGD - Undang-Undang Guru dan Dosen
BPS - Badan Pusat Statistik
DEPDIKNAS - Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
DF - Degree of Fredoom
EFA - Education for All
xx
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE
PAGE
A Teacher self-evaluation/reflection and
observer evaluation of teaching
(Observation instrument)
283
B Research questionnaire 286
C Interview protocol 291
D Region and zone area of regencies in
South Sulawesi province
292
E The Respondent for interview and
observation
293
F Certificate of thesis proofreading 294
G Research recomendation letter of
BALITBANGDA Sulawesi Selatan
295
H Research recommendation letter of Pare-
Pare municipility
296
I Research recommendation letter of Gowa
regency
297
J Research recommendation letter of Bone
regency
298
K Research recommendation letter of
Sidrap regency
299
L Research recommendation letter of
Pangkep regency
300
M Research recommendation letter of
Pinrang regency
301
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Education has become a strategic tool for preparing quality human resources
(UNESCO, 2010; Becker, 1993; Marimuthu, Ariokasamy, and Ismail, 2009).
Education is then theorized to develop highly knowledgeable personnel. In achieving
this notion, professional teachers are essential in preparing generation entering
competitive workforce and participating in society. Hence, many countries and
nations have emphasized education as a vehicle to develop the learning society
(Livingstone, 2004) and to promote skilled human resources (ILO, 2010). As said,
developing professional teachers has been constructed as a vital need in enhancing
the education service.
Moreover, numerous discussions held have presumed teachers to be
professional. One of those thought which originated from Tichenor and Tichenor
(2005) as well as Sockett (1993) emphasized the five dimensions of teacher
professionalism that have to be mastered by a teacher. The five major characteristics
of professional teacher encompass good personality, commitment to change through
ongoing improvement, mastery of pedagogical and subject-content knowledge, as
well as recognition of responsibility beyond the classroom. This point of view makes
teaching an ethical profession because teachers have become on a daily basis: hopes,
dreams, and aspirations among students. Hence, teachers take on roles as guides,
2
mentors to inspire, besides perceiving that teaching is a political activity in
understanding the students culturally and within socio-economic means.
Furthermore, Hargreaves (2003) believes that strong value, along with belief and
ethical spirit has become an integrated parts of teacher professionalism.
On top of that, the enormous challenge of education is to meet the demands
of molding expertise, behavior and skills of people. Hence, it is not a surprise that
many countries and organizations apply the concept of professionalism by managing
education for work skills and technology among its people. In fact, professionalism
is a vehicle to pursue high skilled and knowledgeable teachers through professional
development that accelerates and accommodates changes in education policy and
practice in many countries. In addition, Robertson (2005) asserted that new
knowledge, technology, as well as behavior and attitude need to be built in the quick
changing work environment. Besides, Kohler et al. (2008) specified that education
change mostly refers to aspect of teacher in teaching as well as the characters
context. Due to the facts, Indonesian government expected the teachers to have
cognitive, psychomotor, and affective competences.
Therefore, the efforts of pursuing teacher development are evidently outlined
in the Indonesian constitution to empower and to improve the quality of teachers
regularly and continuously (UUGD, 2005). The constitution ensures the access for
quality improvement and relevance, as well as good governance and accountability
of teachers to face the challenges in local, national, and global level. Moreover,
Fuchs and Fuchs (1998) as well as Cardona-Molto (2003) argued that by
empowering teachers, they can supply and enrich their preferences, besides realizing
all kinds of challenges and impediments. Significantly, the opportunity to improve
teachers’ quality and competences through professional development activities is
secured by the Indonesian law (UUGD, 2005).
3
Furthermore, in Indonesia, teacher development had been considered as the
most important pillar in achieving the goal of education to create competitive human
resources UNESCO, 2010). Thus, the Indonesian government has made efforts to
enhance to the quality and adaptability of teachers profession by issuing law of
education. These are important because teachers have a major responsibility in
preparing qualified students for development (Snoek, 2009). The Indonesian
government also referred to the agreement of Southeast Asian countries and
UNESCO to increase the recognition among them to enhance professionalism by
updating knowledge and skills of teachers. Each country also proposed an effort to
develop teacher professionalism through Continuous Professional Development
(CPD) at all stages. Furthermore, the Indonesian Ministry of National Education
(2009) has been outlined in the strategic plan of Indonesian national education
ministry for 2010-2014 which one focuses on increasing the professionalism of
teachers and education personnel. This attempt is in line with findings obtained by
Day (2002) whereby the school reform required principal, teachers, staffs and other
school community to apply the principles of professionalism in learning process.
Nevertheless, to date the main challenge of the Indonesian nation is the
capability to improve its human resources quality and education sector
(Kemendiknas, 2010). Based on United Nation Development Program (UNDP)
report in 2011, Indonesia was ranked 124th place out of 187 countries for human
development index. Furthermore, this organization had identified challenge in the
education sector for its low level of Indonesian education that which has had a direct
affect towards the quality and the ability of the society. Moreover, the Head of
National Education of South Sulawesi admitted that the competences of student
output in this province had been still low (Antara, 22 January 2014). Their national
rank was 31th place out of 35 provinces although the graduation reached 100 percent.
However, the investment in developing high quality human resources must be
supported by quality education with professional people. As a result, Indonesian
would have life skills, knowledge, and strong self-confidence to compete with others
globally.
4
Therefore, the Indonesian government, state-owned enterprises, and
organizations need to cooperate in fostering CPD to advance the quality of the
teaching workforce. Besides, the fast and the continuous stream of changes in the
global life such as demographic, innovations, politic, socio-cultural, and restructuring
demand is the reasons to be lifelong learners. Furthermore, strengthening and
promoting member’s professional development has been expected to diminish the
gap in the existing bureaucracy. In addition, based on an analysis of OECD and
TALIS (2010), professional development can improve supply and coherent career
support of teacher needs. The relevancies of both teacher professionalism and
professional development construct lifelong professional learning to achieve better
student achievement.
Therefore, this study investigated the practice of teacher professionalism and
teacher professional development activities to identify the alternative program, the
design, and the strategies to be professional teachers at secondary school level in
South Sulawesi, Indonesia. It would be a guideline for stakeholder and teacher to
improve knowledge and teaching skills competences. In fact, the retrieved findings
had answered questions pertaining to the lack of understanding and functioned as a
reflection of problems on both variables to be a professional teacher. Furthermore,
the findings could inspire all teachers to shift from traditional perspectives to new
paradigms in teaching.
Section 1.2 below provides the background for undertaking the study on
teacher professionalism and its problems through learning activities in professional
development. The section also highlights discussion on the shortcomings of teacher
education attainment, teaching competencies, and more about the treatments of
government in professionalizing teachers in South Sulawesi and Indonesia generally.
5
1.2 Background of Problem
Globally, each country adopts different strategies in recruiting teachers as
professional workforce. Nowadays, most countries require the candidates to have
good academic qualification. In Indonesia, all teachers are compulsory to have
bachelor or D-IV degree. Most countries attract the applicants who have strong
performance in teaching and make sure the profile of good teacher (World Bank,
2010b; UNESCO, 2014). Teaching posited as prestigious profession in some rich
countries such as Singapore that only chose the top third of high school graduate and
Finland recruited 10 percent among the competitors to enter teacher education
programs (OECD, 2011b). Meanwhile, the poor countries employ candidates with
low academic qualification.
The Indonesian government has been aggressively moving forward in
preparing competitive human resources for the global free trade (Sutanto, 2013). The
government has been attempted to mobilize the source of human capital in enhancing
national stabilities. In the effort to achieve such independency and stability,
education development becomes a priority in managing and developing very huge
human resources (Bappenas, 2010). According to an expert staff from the Education
Ministry, Kacung Marijan, Indonesia has complex educational issues that range from
low quality teachers, un-standardized curriculum, and inadequate infrastructure.
Focusing on the quality of teacher profession, many teachers have been certified as
professional but they failed to show good competence (PMPTK, 2008). Hence, in
order to recognize the related issues, this study concentrated in South Sulawesi as the
center of economy, culture, and education in the eastern part of Indonesia. The
Governor of South Sulawesi has emphasized the need of education authority and
schools to be improved (Harian Tribun Timur Makassar, 2012). Teacher professional
development also has been given more emphasized to improve the competence of
teachers in improving the quality of education.
6
Moreover, as professionals, teachers play an important role in the teaching
and learning process especially in improving student learning outcomes and
managing other factors contribute to their success (Rivkin, Hanushek, & Kain, 2000;
Sanders & Horn, 1994; Sanders & Rivers, 1996; Boyd, 2006). Thus, the readiness of
teachers for teaching and learning process should be supported by knowledge, skills,
attitude, and practice to improve students’ learning achievement. Therefore, most
literatures require teachers to possess good competences and performance. Besides,
teachers have been suggested to engage their knowledge with the current issues
through professional development, conduct their tasks ethically, and show
commitment or responsibility to their community. The dimensions had also been
identified by Sockett (1993) as well as Tichenor and Tichenor (2005) to analyze the
quality practice of teachers. It seems that teachers are also obliged using different
resources, adapting needed instruction, as well as employing various monitoring and
evaluation strategies. So teachers are able to implement the national goals of
education in providing knowledge, skills, and good characters to participate in the
society.
Indonesia as a developing country has been challenged to solve problems
concerning teacher. World Bank (2010) reported that education attainment of
Indonesian teachers had been lower than required by teacher law. Meanwhile, the
2012 data obtained from the Indonesian Education Ministry indicated that just
487.488 (81.21%) of 600.374 teachers from upper secondary school possessed
bachelor degree or four-year diploma, whereas the rest 112.888 (18.79%) were
Diploma holders. The report also revealed that the teachers gained below 50 score
test on subject knowledge, pedagogic skills, and general academic aptitude. Even
though this test was not a national scale, the teachers in South Sulawesi also gained
below 50 score. In addition, Indonesian teachers had been low commitment and
responsibility where one in five or 12.5 percent of civil servant teachers were absent
from classes (SMERU, 2008). The cases above are associated with limited self-
learning motivation and lack of ethic obedience among teachers.
7
The low level in teacher education attainment among teachers in Indonesia
had been the impact of prior recruitment conditions that require high school degree
and diploma degree to enter the profession (Bjork, 2003). In South Sulawesi, the
Education Statistic Centre identified 19.41 percent of teachers with qualification
below bachelor degree (DEPDIKNAS, 2012). Besides, it was argued if these
qualifications had been enough for teachers to acquire in-depth knowledge and high
skills to meet the needs of students. Moreover, it contrasted with most top-
performing countries which just recruit candidates with the best academic
performance and implied that their teacher must possess master degree (Tuovinen,
2008). The belief was argued by Rout (2007) that teacher education helps a lot in
elevating the system of learning. Hence, the upgrading of academic background to
bachelor degree as a minimum standard had become a great intention of the
Indonesian government. Through teacher certification policy, all teachers are
targeted to hold bachelor or four-year degree by 2015.
Moreover, in professionalizing teaching personnel, the Indonesia Ministry of
Education had identified some symptoms that indicated the low quality among
Indonesian teachers. Previously, Sudarminta (2000) had exposed the weaknesses of
some teachers in the class room such as; (i) lack of mastery of the material being
taught, (ii) mismatch between teachers' subject areas studied and taught, (iii) lack of
effective ways of teaching and authority in front of students, (iv) low motivation and
dedication to become a real educator, (v) lack of emotional maturity, independence
of thought, and attitude determination of being educators where most teachers still
only served as a teacher; (vi) relatively low intellectual level of students as teacher
candidates entering the LPTKs (Institute of Personnel Procurement) compared to
those entering the university. As for the shortcomings, Ingersoll (2007) suggested
that the policy makers should focus on two general approaches; first, ensuring all
subjects are taught by qualified teachers in education and second, supplying the less
subject-teacher by recruiting new qualified teachers or performing resettlement from
a surplus to a deficit one.
8
Besides, the policy makers in Indonesia from national to district levels might
not realize that many teachers are working in a poor work environment. So, teachers
also have concerns toward the public and the government to overcome the limitations
within the profession in order to enhance quality. Moreover, teachers lack autonomy
due to the strict bureaucracy control, limited time and financial support to acquire
professional development, a minimum reward to appreciate teacher’s great work, the
availability of facilities and supporting resources such as information technology to
facilitate teaching. In addition, this was strengthened by a report from UNESCO
(2006) that inadequate resources and facilities threatened the improvement quality
for education in Indonesia. Meanwhile, an indication was reported by Ali (2000)
whereby the teachers felt pressured by the Ministry of Education to cover and to
transfer the prescribed curriculum and content-subject.
In addition, identifying the weaknesses of supervising or evaluating the
influence of teachers’ performance is a part of professionalization. Even though
teachers are supervised, they do not get any feedback as a reflection for
improvement. Furthermore, Schacter (2000) found that the Indonesian public sector
was challenged by the weakness of evaluation system and performance orientation.
Naturally, it ensured the teaching programs run well in accordance to the objectives
as teachers develop knowledge and skills to be implemented in schools.
Undoubtedly, evaluation is one way to correct the policy and the public expenditure
program (Guerrero, 1999) while regular evaluations can be the basis for teachers to
reflect the strengths and the weaknesses in their practices.
Furthermore, many situations discouraged Indonesian teachers to focus on
their performance in teaching, making them powerless, and also neglect their vision
as educators (Bjork, 2005). He observed that the evaluation of teachers just focused
on managerial matters like how to organize tests, flag raising ceremony commitment,
attending meetings, and other bureaucratic conditions but not evaluate teaching
performance among teachers. It means that the improvement of teaching ability is
9
neglected but they are required to follow the instructions, commit to the regulation of
government, and hunt curriculum target. Solving the problem of such condition, the
principal as a manager require redefining the culture at work environment.
Meanwhile, Mantja (2002) argued that teachers can gain the requirements above if
there is a good education management to build their human sense and
professionalism. Teachers and principal must be proactive to recover and to develop
individual talent, potency, and interest. In this case, the principal should care and be
aware of teachers’ professionalism needs including; (i) the involvement of teachers
based on their own personality, talent, and achievement to get promotion, (ii) the
simultaneous teachers’ development, (iii) the improvement of teachers’ collaboration
with the school principal.
On top of that, teacher professionalism refers to the personal, knowledge,
skills, and environment quality in conducting teaching and learning activities. In
developing countries including Indonesia, it is often signed by the school work
environment that does not support a collaborative and collegial atmosphere for the
growing of professionalism (Hilferty, 2008; Locke, 2001; Reeves, 2007; Rizvi and
Elliot, 2007; Wood, 2007; Garret, 2010). Moreover, lack of collaboration and
mentoring culture among teachers to solve the current problems had become a
warning in schools. Conversely, good teaching practice can be reached by
encouraging collaborative practice to discuss research findings, as well as share ideas
from seminars, and collective work to determine effective strategies (Becker and
Riel, 1999). Glazer (1999) also asserted that collaboration between teachers inside
and outside the school determines teaching and learning quality in the class.
Collaborating improve teachers’ professionalism because they can elaborate different
knowledge on strategy in implementing design of teaching (Purba, 2005). Hence,
teachers should ensure success of students by collaborating with colleagues, parents,
administrators, and education professionals. These findings remind us the strength of
team work in working environment to enrich the strategy as well as the quality of
teaching and learning.
10
Individually, a number of factors do hinder the improvements of teacher
professionalism. Cheng May Hung as stated in (Townsend and Bates, 2007) asserted
that there are three points of tribulations faced by teachers in Indonesia as a
developing country including; (1) heavy work load that causes the teachers to have
less time for preparation; (2) principal support, policy and management system at
school; (3) inadequate school resources. Likewise in Canada, a teacher is challenged
by the existing time to integrate learning into their works (ATA, Sept 13, 2011).
Besides, time constraint is also acknowledged by Wilms (2002) that in the service of
students learning, teachers have no much time to work collectively. As professional,
teachers should be able to manage school system, its learning resources as well as to
plan time well based on the profession and private needs. They need commitment to
balance their time in serving their clients through day-to-day activities.
Meanwhile, a research by Misbahuddin (2013) discovered the discrepancy
factors inhibiting the development of teacher profession in South Sulawesi, namely;
(1) the lack of awareness among teachers in developing the profession continuously;
(2) the sufficient capacity so as not serious in the training; (3) less benefit for the
development of competence in teaching because the participants have irrelevant
basic skills, and (4) lack of attention from the local government to the activities of
Teacher-Subject Forum or MGMP. In line with Nielsen (1996), some participants in
professional development got differed with their basic knowledge that resulted
useless things for their competence development in teaching.
Generally, there are many unqualified teachers in South Sulawesi due to the
limited access and resources especially in the rural areas. They rarely get formal
training and updated curriculum that hindered their knowledge and teaching skills
(Saluling, 2009). To date, teacher training is a challenge in supporting teacher
professionalism because the government has limitations. The Indonesian government
has tried to enrich education quality by strengthening training for teachers, but failed
to determine the level of commitment and investment in professional development of
teachers, and thus failed to produce an improved performance (Nielsen, 1996).
11
Overall, the focus of training originates from reflection and evaluation, whereas
theory and practice taught in training must be relevant to school needs and emphasis
more on method and practice of teaching.
Apart from that, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, the president of the Republic
of Indonesia in 2012 expressed his concern on Teachers’ Day that although most
teachers have additional income from certification and other incentives from local
and central government, hold the status as professional teachers, and gain more
training, they still show unstable commitment and enthusiasm towards their job.
Moreover, the members of the local parliament in South Sulawesi highlighted that
the quality of certified teachers did not meet the expectations. The parliamentary
regretted that many certified teachers were less discipline to teach and even declined
in professional quality that affected the learning process of the students (BKM, May
17, 2014). Hence, the authorities in education, the school supervisor and the
principal need to support the teachers, whereas the teachers should reflect regularly
in order to enhance their commitment, expertise, and inspiration in teaching. Besides,
Toh et al. (2006) and Watt & Richardson (2008) believed that commitment and
motivation are very significant towards the behavior of a teacher.
The complexity problems of teacher development in Indonesia had
encouraged the researcher’s concern to study the aspects of teacher professionalism
and teacher professional development in order to gain an alternative model for
professional teacher development. Section 1.3 below discusses how the teachers in
Indonesia perceived their professionalism to improve their knowledge, skills and
practice through teacher professional development. These issues are pointed out to
clarify the Indonesian context in order to facilitate understanding among readers on
the underlying two variables.
12
1.3 The Needs and the Challenges of Teacher Professionalism and
Professional Development in Indonesia
In Indonesia, the concepts of professionalism and professional development
for teacher are clearly explained in teacher law as a reform in education policy. The
face of the concepts is also contextually described in the national education
development 2010-2014 to represent teachers as professional. The highlight of the
effort made by the Indonesian government to improve professionalism and
professionalizing through professional development also contributed to the needs of
this research.
1.3.1 Improving Teacher Professionalism for Work Challenges
In the Indonesian national policy context, teacher professionalism is related to
the ability of teachers in conducting their role and function as well as how they
behave in the context of school and society. An Indonesian teacher is characterized
as excellent in nationalism in term of fighting spirit, faith and devotion, mastery of
science and technology, work ethics and discipline, cooperative in learning, have
insight into the future, career certainty, as well as inner and outer well-being
(UUGD, 2005). By having these characteristics, the Indonesian Law of Teachers and
Lecturers No. 14 Year 2005 mandates teachers as professional educators with the
primary task of teaching, even though Dahrin (2000) and Mustofa (2007) argued that
more teachers were unqualified in transferring knowledge and pursuing quality
education.
In carrying out professionalism duties, the profession of teacher has to meet
certain quality standards or norms and requirement of professional education as a
source of income (Sutanto, 2013). Teachers must be independent as well as possess
self-control on knowledge, skills, and behaviors as a set of competence. Besides,
13
they require academic qualification of a bachelor or four-years-diploma in
accordance with the type, the level, and the formal education units where they are
assigned to (UUGD, 2005). Unfortunately, a research conducted by the Education
Science Consortium in 2008 proved that teachers had low mastery on subject
teaching and 33 percent taught beyond their education background. Since teacher
certification was launched, teachers focused on specific subject matter and it
becomes an evidence of formal recognition as professionals given by the state.
Moreover, the Research and Education Development of the Indonesian
Education Department has tried to improve the professionalism of teachers by
enhancing their knowledge, professional attitudes, as well as skills in educating and
teaching for many years. The department also suggested that professional teachers
should engage in activities such as continuing education, reflecting on the teaching
and learning process and being active in professional development. Unfortunately,
teachers seemed hamper by time and financial allocation from the authority in
fulfilling the requirements of being a professional. Besides, Maister (1997)
confirmed that professional is more than a technician who has not only high skills
but also requires exemplary behavior and attitude. Meanwhile, Supriadi (1998)
explains that a professional teacher is required to possess five aspects namely; (1)
being committed to students’ learning; (2) in-depth mastery of subjects taught and
how to transfer knowledge to students; (3) responsible in monitoring student learning
outcomes through various means of evaluation; (4) ability to think systematically
about what he does and learn from experience; (5) be a part of the learning
community within the profession.
Besides, since the Indonesian Law of Teacher and Lecturers (2005) had been
issued, teacher profession requires people with talents, interests, vocation, and
idealism. In addition, teaching staffs should commit in improving the quality of
education, faith, piety, and noble character. Besides, academic professional
qualification and education background link and match with the assignment. Teacher
should have competence for the duties as well as be responsible for professionalism
14
performance to earn income. However, Hasan (2003) and Mustofa (2007) contended
that many teachers had been unaware in conducting their tasks and possessed low
self-motivation in enhancing their self-performance. In this case, teachers should
have equal opportunities to develop in a sustainable manner with the professionalism
of lifelong learning (Purwanto, 2002). Although the government has guaranteed legal
protection in carrying out the professionalism duties and the organization authorizes
to regulate the task of teacher, many teachers have failed to fulfill their rights in
professional learning activities.
Theoretically, the government initiates to empower teacher via development
of self-organized or autonomy conducted in democratic, equitable, non-
discriminatory, uphold of human rights, religious and cultural values in pluralistic
nation, as well as code of ethics. On the other hand, teachers are demanded to their
work challenges in the past changing of global world. In carrying out professionalism
tasks, teachers also face moral and social crisis such as poverty, unemployment,
violence and crimes. Moreover, nowadays, teachers have to compete with other
professional teacher in the free trade area. Hence, teachers have to be motivated in
improving and developing academic qualification and competence on an ongoing
basis in line with developments in science, technology and art.
The profession of teacher also has some rights in carrying out their
professionalism as a responsibility to the profession, government, and public. In this
case, teachers are facilitated to have maximum income, good social welfare,
promotion, award, and protection in carrying out the duties as public
servicers. Moreover, the government is also responsible to keep the rights of teacher
concerning intellectual property, opportunity to improve competences, as well as to
obtain and to utilize learning infrastructure to support professionalism tasks.
Teachers also have freedom in assessment and evaluation or sanction to students in
accordance with rules of education, teacher’s code of ethic, legislation, and
regulation. In gaining a sense of security and safety assurance in performing the
tasks, teachers have the freedom to associate in professional organizations, and
15
opportunity in determining education policy. Unfortunately, many teachers have less
chance to develop their academic qualifications and competences, as well as in
getting involved in training and professional development in the field.
Professionalism has great influence in performing their duties, developing,
and employing education technology. At present, Indonesian teachers are challenged
to adapt the revolution of technology information in improving their professionalism.
The development of information technology changes the pattern of teacher-pupil
relationship, models of learning, and education system as a whole. Besides,
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) should be used in education to
achieve the goals rather than as a barrier. The role of a teacher is not the only source
of learning because the availability and the easy access of learning resources as well
as sources of information to facilitate a person to learn. Therefore, schools are no
longer the only center of learning because learning activities are no longer limited by
space and time.
Next, the Indonesian development paradigm has shifted to increase the
participation of people in supporting and in managing the development of education.
Learning from past experiences, the government was more powerful to marginalize
society in the development process. Active participation implies that teachers, staffs,
and society should be place as actors who benefit from the process in finding a
solution or achieving development outcomes at schools and their environment in a
broader sense. Thus, teachers should be able to improve the quality of self-reliance to
overcome these problems individually and collectively.
Moreover, it has been clear how the teachers played their roles, function, and
responsibilities to the profession based on professionalism principles. Therefore, the
current intention had been to identify the strategies in maximizing the efforts of both
government and teachers to improve via public control as well as to face the
challenges locally and globally. The next section, section 1.3.2 summarizes the
16
policy of teacher professional development and its aims in empowering and
upgrading teachers to grow their professionalism.
1.3.2 Staff Professional Development in Professionalizing Teacher Proficiency
In improving teachers’ qualification and obligating certification, teachers
need opportunity to be involved in professional development to maintain and to
enhance their knowledge, skills, and practice. The types of professional development
employed in Indonesia to improve teacher professionalism are such as, PKG (Pusat
Kegiatan Guru or Centre for Teacher Activity), KKG (Kelompok Kerja Guru or
Teachers Working Group), and MGMP (Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran or Forum
of Teacher-subject) which allow teachers to share their experiences in solving
problems they face in teaching activities (Supriadi, 1998). The other forms of
professional development attributed for teachers are training and workshop with
general or specific purposes in education. The programs were proposed to reduce the
daily-faced problem in learning and teaching as well as enhancing teachers’
innovation and creativity for the success of students.
In addition, teacher-subject forum (MGMP) is the most familiar kind of
professional development among teachers in Indonesia because it covers all areas
geographically from urban to rural. Besides, the empowerment of MGMP is
interpreted as process to live, grow, and evolve teacher skills and knowledge over
time. The sustainability of MGMP has been expected to act as a reformer in the
classroom, mediator in improving teacher competences, agent of "encouragement" in
classroom management, and a tool for innovation. In fact, the organization of MGMP
has become collaborators between the units at schools and the relevant professional
organizations. Moreover, the success of MGMP is strongly influenced by the work
ethic of all trustees, members, and teachers of similar subjects in building the spirit
of togetherness and brotherhood. The members build a network in communicating
17
teaching problems which is sterile from various temptation and interests. At present,
MGMP insists on a dynamic motion in transforming itself into complicated,
complex, and challenging teaching profession.
On top of that, the strength of MGMP emphasizes on how to develop
professional skills among teachers in a forum. During this forum, the participants are
encouraged to increase the quality of teaching and teacher competence. A systematic
discussion starts from teaching planning, process, evaluation, and reflection.
However, there are times when this board invited the trustees from local department
of education to obtain the latest information about government policy. Nevertheless,
MGMP is still focused on the development of teacher skills, knowledge, and practice
based on operational guidance.
For further professional development, the Department of Education at
province level also held a training or workshop. The focus can be general or specific.
As for the general subject, for instance, the government disseminates new policies in
curriculum or approaches in teaching, while, the specific focus can be related to the
innovation in teaching or materials development per subject-matter. Later, the
participants would be the disseminator to other teachers to spread the information.
Unfortunately, the application of knowledge from training or workshop is rather
difficult due to limited school facilities and resources for teaching and learning.
Moreover, the success of teacher professional development is usually
handicapped by many factors. Even though MGMP is organized in district areas,
there are some shortcomings, both from teachers themselves and from other external
factors. The problems come from teachers who do not openly expose the weakness in
teaching and learning. Besides, the level of participation and motivation among
teachers in sharing and disseminating experiences is interrupted by the distance of
area and communication factors whereas some districts face geographical problem in
taking part in the programs.
18
At present, the past global changes have inspired more innovation in
professional development model. One of the newest is Teacher Growth Model
(TGM) that engages teachers in continual learning to equip with relevant knowledge
and skills. Besides, teachers are also encouraged to pursue multiple learning
activities such as training, mentoring, networking, experiential learning etc.
throughout their career. The activities are conducted via cooperative learning by
encouraging teachers to learn together in promoting greater synergy and coherence
across different teachers and schools. Moreover, for the success of teacher growth,
the Ministry of Education (MoE) has committed in investing teacher professional
growth and supporting the activities.
In fact, nowadays, the trend of teacher professional development is focused in
improving academic qualification of all from two or three years-diploma degree to
bachelor degree. To date, the increased numbers of teacher with master and doctoral
degrees functions as means to improve the quality of profession and career
opportunity. Except for the forms of education and training for teachers, principal,
school inspectors, and tutor must be in accordance with the need of teachers in
classroom. Next, based on the background, section 1.4 depicted the problems related
to the scope of the research in the areas of teacher professionalism and professional
development.
1.4 Statement of Problem
Professionals, including teachers need professional development as learning
opportunities to strengthen and to improve the practice of their professionalism.
Teacher professional development is a substance of professionalism (Evan, 2008;
Hargreaves et al., 2001). It is supported by Guskey’s (2002) identification that one of
the main components in improving skilled teacher and professional culture is high
quality professional development. It is a chance and space to put their motivation,
19
energy, knowledge, and skills acquired (UNESCO, 2014). Besides, the program like
formal education and training do not only enhance knowledge and professionalism
but also become a tool in achieving recognition or promoting social status (Baharin
Abu, 2000). Nevertheless, professionalism of teachers in Indonesia is still
inadequate in terms of the mastery of subject knowledge. Mustofa (2007) and Dahrin
(2000) claimed the quality and professionalism were still out of the expectation
because many teachers teach beyond their subject field and unqualified in conveying
and organizing the class well.
From the point of view, the exploration and the description of teacher
professionalism and professional development in South Sulawesi have indeed
become crucial. In term of professionalism, the researcher explored the mastery of
knowledge and teaching competences. It also described behavior and attitude of
teacher in enhancing teaching profession as well as effective learning in professional
development activities. Furthermore, this study identified the supports and the
constraints of promoting professionalism and professional development of teachers.
Hence, five problems concerning teacher professionalism and professional
development were identified for investigation in this study. The first problem
identified teacher competences as the main core of professionalism. In Indonesia,
teachers are required to have good professional, pedagogic, personal, and social
competences, but many researchers have proved that their knowledge, skills and
instructional practices were still low (Sudarminta, 2000, Danim, 2010, Barber and
Mourshed, 2007, World Bank, 2010). One of the most prevailing concerns of the
Indonesian government was the mastery of professional knowledge, pedagogic skills,
and academic aptitude which were also under the average of score test. In July, 2012,
the surprising test results of 1. 006. 211 certified that teachers at all provinces
including South Sulawesi on both professional and pedagogical competencies just
gain the average score under 50 (Harian Kompas, 03/08/2012). Hence, it is evident to
give serious attention towards Indonesian teachers because it influences teacher
performance in teaching and facilitating students in learning.
20
The second problem related to teacher characters comprising of behavior,
attitude, and ethics in reference to principles as well as values of professionalism.
Goodson and Hargreaves (1996) also defined professionalism as quality and
character of teacher’s action in behaving as professional within public sector
professions. In an important study by Misbahuddin (2013), he concluded that
teachers in South Sulawesi were less aware and serious in developing their
profession. His findings also signed that teachers felt satisfied on skills and
knowledge they obtained as this character contradicted with professional who were
responsible in refining the content of their work. Moreover, attitude and behavior are
two characters of professional teachers to develop stronger sense of professionalism
(Kramer, 2003). Due to that, attitude is everything (Reding, 2000) while behavior is
very important to recognize and to perform their takes in daily life (Wong and Wong,
1998). Teachers’ character can be evaluated on how they treat and teach students
(Lumpkin, 2008). By showing positive attitude and behavior, teachers play an
essential role in assisting students learning with moral-reasoning process.
In addition, based on the researcher’s private conversation with an island
community, the school was only opened for at least three months throughout a year.
Nationally, the rate of absenteeism among government teachers in the class was still
12.5 percent (SMERU, 2008) and the violence by teacher against student was still
adorned by the media. Another unethical attitude that scares the future of students is
dishonest among teachers in national test to pass the students in order to raise the
school status (Novitasari, 2011; Alawiyah, 2012). These are signs of low
commitment to the profession in which Indonesian teachers should be fully aware
that they are role models to behave and act based on moral values and ethics as
educators of the nation. The characters, behavior and attitude of a professional are
essential element to develop the strong meaning of professionalism (Wong and
Wong, 1998; Hurst and Reding, 2000).
The third problem had been in getting effective professional development,
with teachers as the front line executors at school and policy makers as regulators at
21
the education department should examine the activities to support the
professionalism of teachers. In addition, Nielsen (1996) concluded in his study that
the government of Indonesia had attempted to enhance the quality of education by
strengthening training for all teachers, but the result showed low level of
commitment and investment in teacher professional development that did not
produce improved performance. Besides, there is a strong indication that the failure
had been caused by the weakness of evaluation as Bjork (2005) observed that
evaluation mainly focused on ceremonial and managerial issues, but not on teacher
performance.
Meanwhile, the fourth problem had been related to education policy reform
especially for teacher professionalism and professional development. The policy had
been related to management and supporting factors in education systems. The
appropriate supports help teachers to accomplish their educational needs, as well as
fulfill their educational demand, and vocational needs (Ifanti & Fotopoulopou, 2011),
besides to be managed well (Day and Gu, 2007). A part form that the policy makers
must take into account of teachers’ voice and needs in order to not only change but
also to support teachers’ work effectively. They have to create a sense of
professionalism in workplace environment such as continuous training and learning
although the government of Indonesia itself has limitation fulfilling them (Sidik,
2012). Moreover, some regencies in South Sulawesi allocate very little budget for
teacher training and not for every year. On the other hand, teachers face increased
pressure and accountability but no increased corresponding in supports or resources
to achieve higher standards. The policy has been continual but teachers as an agent of
change get little support. In fact, they frequently become rhetorical target of the
government.
The fifth problem was to minimize teachers’ constraints to improve their
professionalism and to organize professional development as well. Ifanti and
Fotopoulopou (2011) reiterated that unsatisfactory working condition like; low
22
salaries, big classes, poor bureaucracy and school administration system affected the
professionalism negatively. Another factor is the insufficient and the inconsistent
funding allocated to conduct as well as to participate in professional development.
Moreover, the Indonesian Ministry of Education admitted that they had limitation in
holding teacher training to support teacher professionalism (Directorate of Basic
Education, 2012). They also faced systemic restrictions that made it difficult to join
professional development, for instance; limited time, distance, and lack of regular
communication with fellow teachers (Saluling, 2009). Hence, the government needs
to redefine effective professional development such as internal workshop, training
and mentoring among teachers.
The conditions above depend on the readiness level of government to
encounter the fast changing and high demanding workforces. Everything should be
prepared instantly to fulfill the needs without having quality control. As widely
known, all professions as well as teachers have their own problems in giving
satisfaction service to clients as they frame special treatments to distinguish them
from other professions (Hilton & Southgate, 2007 and Whitty, 2008). Besides, the
main issues had been usually related to the provision of quality services and provide
satisfactory results. To achieve both of them, people usually associate with the
professionalism of personnel and building teacher professional development in order
to become a professional.
Therefore, this study was conducted to examine teacher professionalism and
professional development to enrich the lack of researches on it in Indonesia,
particularly in South Sulawesi. This study investigated; (1) the level of teachers’
competences; (2) the characteristics of teachers’ professional practices; (3)
professional development practices; (4) the factors support professionalism and
professional development; and (5) teachers constraints on both fields. In addition, a
framework was developed to promote teacher professionalism and to improve
teacher professional development.
23
1.5 Research Objectives
This study investigated teacher professionalism and teacher professional
development in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Hence, the questions proposed in this
research would contribute to the improvement on how the teachers build their
profession based on teacher professionalism models. Besides, it had been possibly to
identify teachers’ constraints as professionals that would influence teacher quality
and teaching practice in Indonesia. Meanwhile, in the professionalization process,
teachers have had an agreement on their practice as Tichenor and Tichenor (2009)
concluded that teacher professionalism level can be upgraded for all teachers as
educators by diminishing the disagreement area on teacher professionalism.
The research objectives mainly comprise the qualitative that explore teachers’
pedagogic competence, characteristics of professional practices, professional
development practices, supporting factors and constraints in promoting their
professionalism as well as professional development. The objectives are listed below.
i. To determine the level of pedagogical competence among secondary school
teachers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
ii. To describe the characteristics of teachers’ professional practices by
secondary school teachers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
iii. To describe professional development practices among secondary school
teachers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
iv. To identify the supporting factors of teacher professionalism and teacher
professional development among secondary school teachers in South
Sulawesi, Indonesia.
v. To identify the constraints faced in promoting teacher professionalism and
professional development activities in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
24
1.6 Research Questions
Based on the objectives in section 1.5, this study developed questions to
investigate teacher professionalism and professional development practices, supports
and constraints factors. The research questions are presented in following:
i. What is the level of pedagogic competence of secondary school teachers in
South Sulawesi, Indonesia?
ii. What are the characteristics of teachers’ professional practices by secondary
school teachers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia?
iii. How do the professional development activities effective in promoting
teacher professionalism in South Sulawesi, Indonesia?
iv. What are the supporting factors of teacher professionalism and teacher
professional development in South Sulawesi, Indonesia?
v. What are the constraints faced in promoting teacher professionalism and
professional development in South Sulawesi, Indonesia?
1.7 Significance of the Study
This research was carried out to derive benefits that could be used
theoretically and the practically. The significances of the study are depicted in the
following:
i. This study provided a guideline for the government in implementing the
policy and regulation in education to be coordinated among the agencies
in education ministry. However, compliance is also required, completion,
as well as implementation of the policy.
ii. The results of this research become a document to stakeholders
concerning teacher empowerment policy in south Sulawesi, Indonesia.
25
Hence, the regional parliament, district education office, board of
education, school committees, schools and teachers cooperates in
conducting various professional development activities at schools.
iii. As for the regional parliament, this research becomes an evaluation
reference in planning regulations to improve the quality of education,
budget system, and control the education policies especially teacher
empowerment policy. The parliament required to know teachers’ needs
and their constraints.
iv. Meanwhile, for the regency government in South Sulawesi, the existence
of this research could be employed as a recommendation to the
implementation of education policies in fulfilling the needs of teachers
and supporting the development of their professionalism.
v. This study becomes a guideline for teachers at school in achieving
professional status as well as in conducting effective learning activities.
Hence, the findings could be applied as the input for both the local and
the national government in handling issues pertaining to teacher
development.
1.8 Conceptual Framework of Study
In investigating teacher professionalism in developing teachers as professional
by empowering professional development, several key concepts are elaborated in
figure 1.1. Teacher professional development model by Desimone (2009) had been
expected to bring changes among teachers’ practice, knowledge, skills, and attitude.
She believes that effective professional development must consider the above
mentioned five core features which mainly focused on content, active learning,
coherence with the policy, duration, and collective participation among the school
communities. The framework also involved the demography factors which focused
26
on gender, age, years of experience, and education background. These elements had
been considered a significant toward building professionalism among teachers in
South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Additionally, the conceptual framework of the study included Tichenor and
Tichenor (2005) and Sockett (1993) dimensions of teacher professionalism. They
posited five dimensions that comprised of personal characters, having commitment to
change teaching practice and continuous self-improvement, subject knowledge,
pedagogical skills, and participation beyond the classroom. However, all the
dimensions were not categorized rigidly based on Tichenor and Sockett’s framework.
Instead, unification and addition from five to six dimensions were made to reflect the
information needed. This flexibility was incorporated to obtain better reflection on
the particular context and setting of teachers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The sub-
areas under the six dimensions were further enriched to include the related-aspects.
The conceptual framework of the study comprised of five bases of selected
dimensions of the concepts or theories. (i) characters related to the act of taking care
and nurturing, sociable, patient, discipline, tolerant, confident, a role model, hard-
working, creative-innovative, strong dedication, goal and vision-oriented, on time,
enthusiastic, and risk-takers a. Behavior, ethic, and attitude include independent,
obey the ethical conduct of profession, and collaborative; (ii) Pedagogical
competence: classroom management, learning strategies and deep content-subject;
(iii) Learning activities as commitment in changing their practice in the class and
continuously having improvement: reflective and actively involved in the
professional development activities ; (iv) Supporting factors in management and
resources: reward, career development, education and training, as well as learning
resources; and (v) professionalism constraints: bureaucracy, workplace environment,
financial and time.
27
Based on the exploration of teacher professionalism and professional
development practices, it might give alternative to have professional teacher
development in Figure 1.1 below:
Figure 1.1: The conceptual framework of the study in investigating teacher
professionalism and professional development among secondary school teachers
1.9 Limitations of Study
This study had several limitations. In terms of administered and distributed
the questionnaire, the researcher was difficult to meet the respondents directly
because not all the teachers had classes at the day. It depended on their teaching
DIMENSIONS OF TEACHER
PROFESSIONALISM:
- Pedagogical competence
- Characters (behavior and
attitude)
- Learning activities as
commitment to change and
continuous improvement
- Supporting factors in
management and resources
- Professionalism constraints
(Sockett, 1993; Tichenor
and Tichenor, 2005)
FEATURES OF
TEACHER
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT:
- Focus content
- Active learning
- Coherence
- Duration
- Collective participation
(Desimone, 2009)
Professional Teachers
Framework of Professional Teachers Development
28
schedule. Some respondents asked several days to answer and finish the
questionnaire. In gathering the data from six regencies also needed more time and
cost because the research’s setting and location were quite far away from one to
other regencies.
Another limitation was finding two respondents in regency for interview and
observation. Some teachers felt that it was a hard duty to be interviewed and
prepared the class for observation. After collecting data, the researcher had to learn
how to analyze percentage, mean score, and standard deviation by using SPSS
software and managing the qualitative data by using N-Vivo. All of the tools above
were a new thing for the researcher. Many ways were used to finish the analysis such
consulting with someone who understand about it or learnt from the tutorial in the
internet.
1.10 Terms of Conceptual and Operational Definitions
Some definitions for terms related to conceptual and operational used in this
study are described briefly. The terms comprised of teacher professionalism,
behavior and attitude, pedagogical competence, learning activities, and professional
development.
1.10.1 Teacher professionalism
The term of teacher professionalism is explained separately. Firstly, teacher
means a person employed by a school district in a professional capacity to instruct
students. Teacher is also defined as professional educator who is mainly assigned in
educating, teaching, directing, guiding, training students, combined with routine
29
assessment and evaluation in early childhood, primary and secondary high school
education (UUGD, 2005). In this study, teacher is someone who teaches at the state
upper secondary school level in South Sulawesi and has been certified as a
professional teacher.
Secondly, the term of professionalism is translated in different contexts.
Evetts (2009) and Hargreaves (2000) defined it as the conduct, demeanour and
standards that guide the work of professionals. It can also be described as the quality
practice of performance, exemplary behaviour and attitude in occupation, as well as
the way to incorporate obligation, skills and knowledge into collegiality context
through ethical relation with clients (Hoyle, 1980). In the meantime, Sockett (1993)
illustrated it as the way in conducting attitude and behaviour within daily occupation,
how the members being fully competent with the required knowledge and skills
through collective and collegial cooperation based on contractual and ethics with
clients.
The notion of teacher professionalism in this study refers to practice of
professional characters (behavior and attitude), master subject knowledge and
pedagogical skills towards the profession as a teacher. A professional teacher
recognizes the supporting factors and in overcoming the constraints of the career.
1.10.2 Behavior and attitude
Behavior is the sum of simple acts or what someone does. According to
Wong and Wong (1998) a professional attitude is defined as the way of someone
carrying out his or her business not by the business of a person in it. In this study,
behavior is related to the act in doing his/her duty as a teacher in and out of school.
Meanwhile, attitude is defined by Hornby (1974) as the manner of keeping or
30
holding one’s behavior, as well as the way of expressing feeling, mind, and attitude.
According to Calhoun (1990) attitude is a group of beliefs and inherent feelings
about a particular object and tendency to act against the object in a certain way. It is
addressed as independency, obedience to ethical conduct, and collaboration among
others.
1.10.3 Pedagogical competence
Competence of pedagogic is described as an individual capability in using,
coordinating, and synergizing various physical resources (e.g. teaching materials
such as textbooks, printed articles, and tools of technology such as software and
hardware) as well as non-material resources (practical knowledge, skills, experience)
to achieve efficient and effective pedagogical performance (Madhavaram, 2010). In
this study, the definition had been translated as the ability of a teacher to manage the
classroom and to apply various learning strategies based on subject-content in
facilitating the students to learn.
1.10.4 Learning activities
Learning activities is described as daily activities that can be conducted in
formal and non-formal situation by elaborating various learning experiences, as well
as optimizing and empowering teachers’ knowledge, skills, abilities, and values. It
involves the process of acquisition that helps teachers to develop the learning process
among students, develop a common instruction in understanding the processes and
the objectives of teaching and learning, as well as engage in improving teaching and
learning (GTCE). In this study, learning activities mean formal and informal
activities where teachers enhance their competence in teaching along their career.
31
1.10.5 Professional development
Desimone (2009) defined professional development as any activity to improve
paid staffs members roles for the present and the future in school districts.
Professional development can also be seen as a process of professional growth
(Keiny, 1994). It may refer to the degree of teachers’ value as a continuous self-
development and a whole improvement among the school community. Teachers
compile ideas through seminars presentation, colleagues, organizations meeting, and
other professional earning activities in updating current knowledge, particularly the
latest instructional knowledge and practices (Gruenert, 1998).
Meanwhile, professional development in this study had been related to teacher
learning activities (self-learning, mentoring, as well as in-service training) in and out
of school by considering the principles such as focus on relevant content, participant
active learning, coherence with the local and national policy, sufficient time to
practice and to reflect the learning, and collective participation of school communities
in achieving effective result.
240
REFERENCES
Abadzi, H. (2007). Absenteeism and Beyond: Instructional Time Losses and
Consequences. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4376. Washington,
DC: World Bank.
Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert
Labor. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Acker, S. (1992). Creating Careers: Woman Teachers at Works. Curriculum
Enquiries. 22(2), 141-163.
Action Aid. (2005). Contradicting Commitments: How the Achievement of Education
For All is Being Undermined by the IMF, By Akanksha A. Marphatia and David
Archer, Action Aid International.
Adelman, Howard S. and Taylor, Linda. (2006). School and Community
Collaboration to Promote a Safe Learning Environment. The State Education
Standard. Journal of The National Association of State Board of Education.
Ahmad, Iqbal et al. (2013). Effects of Professional Attitude of Teachers on their
Teaching Performance: Case of Government Secondary School Teachers in
Malakand Region, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Educational and
Social Research, Vol. 3(1), 25-31.
Ahmed, Saifuddin. (2009). Method in Sample Survey: Cluster Sampling. School of
Hygiene and Public Health: John Hopkins University.
Aiken, L.R. (1994). Psychological Testing and Assessment. (8th Edition).
Massachusetts: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Alawiyah, Faridah. (2012). Pelaksanaan Ujian Nasional Tahun 2012. Info Singkat
Kesejahteraan Sosial. Vol. IV, No. 09/P3DI. ISSN. 2088-2351.
241
Ali, M.A. (2000), “Supervision for Teacher Development: An Alternative Model for
Pakistan”, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 20, pp. 177-88.
Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality Teaching for Diverse Students in Schooling: Best
Evidence Synthesis. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Ajila, Chris and Abiola, Awonusi. (2004). Influence of Rewards on Workers
Performance on an Organization. Journal of Social Science, Vol. 8(1), 7-12.
Allmark, P. (2002). The Ethics of Research with Children. Nurse Researcher.10. 7-
19.
Anderson, Gary L. (1998). Deconstructing Participatory Reforms in Education.
American Educational Research Journal, winter 1998, Vol. 35 No. 4 (pp. 571-603).
Anho, R.O. (2001). The Role of Education Administrators in Nigeria
Secondary Schools. African Journal of Education and Technology, Vol. 1
(1) pp. 39-44.
Anoymous. (n.d). Teacher Professionalism.
http://www.teachersrock.net/TEACHER%20PROFESSIONALISM.pdf.
Anonymous. (2011). Teacher Professionalism. ATA News, September 13, 2011.
CBCA Complete. Pg. 7.
Anonymous. (2009). Teacher Professionalism : The Canadian Case. The Alliance
meeting on August 2009. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. University of
Toronto.
Anonymous. (2011). Transforming Teaching : Connecting Professional
Responsibility with Students Learning. A Report to the NEA.
Antara News. (2014). Kadis Pendidikan: Kompetensi Siswa di Sul-Sel Rendah.
Kamis, 23 Januari 2014. http://www.antara-
sulawesiselatan.com/berita/52304/kadis-pendidikan-kompetensi-siswa-di-sulsel-
rendah
Anwar, M.I. (2003). Administrasi Pendidikan dan Manajemen Pembiayaan
Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Aoki, N. (2000) Aspects of Teacher Autonomy: Capacity, Freedom and
Responsibility. Paper presented at 2000 Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology Language Centre Conference.
242
Apelis, Eliakim Tokacap. (2008). The Relationship Between the Inspectorial System
and Teacher Professionalism: A Papua New Guinea Primary School Case Study.
Unpublished Dessertation. Brisbane : Center for Learning Education Queensland
University of Technology.
Archibald, Sarah. (2011). High-Quality Professional Development for All Teachers:
Effectively Allocating Resources. Washington: National Comprehensive Centre
for Teacher Quality. Available at
http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/HighQualityProfessionalDevelop
ment.pdf
Arends, R. I., Winitzky, N. E. & Tannenbaum, M. D. (1998). Exploring Teaching.
New York: McGraw Hill.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher
Education over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education 27, no. 1: 10–20.
Azizi Yahaya et al. ( 2007). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan.Kuala
Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research: 9th Edition. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Thomson.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Perwakilan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. (2011). Peta
Administratif Sulawesi Selatan. http://makassar.bpk.go.id/web/?page_id=318
Bagley, C., & Hunter, B. (July 1992). Constructivism and Technology: Forging a
New Relationship. Educational Technology, 22–27.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan (BPPDP) (2006). Pelan
Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006-2010. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran
Malaysia.
Baharin Abu, (2000). Teaching Effectiveness and Staff Professional Development
Programs at a Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD thesis,
School of Education the University of Birmingham.
Baharum, Zarita. (2006). A Study of Service Quality in Property Management of
Purpose Built Office Buildings in Malaysia. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Universiti
Teknologi MARA.
243
Baker, S. and S. Smith. (1999). Starting Off on the Right Foot: The Influence of Four
Principles of Professional Development in Improving Literacy Instruction in Two
Kindergarten Programs. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(4): 239-
253.
Bakhtiar, B. M. (1994). Membina Budaya Empowerment dalam Pengurusan
Pendidikan. Makalah dipresentasikan di Seminar Nasional Pengurusan Pendidikan
ke-4, Genting Hinghlands, 4-16 Nov 1994.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing Practice, Developing Practitioners:
Toward a Practice-based Theory of Professional Education. In G. Sykes & L.
Darling-Hammond ~Eds., Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of
Policy and Practice ~pp. 3–32. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bappenas, (2010). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN)
2010-1014. Jakarta: Indonesia.
Barber, M. (2001) High Expectations and Standards for All, No Matter What:
Creating a World Class Education Service in England, in Fielding, M. (ed) Taking
Education Really Seriously, Four Years Hard Labour. London:Routledge, pp.17–
41
Barber, M. (2005) Informed Professionalism: Realizing the Potential. Presentation
to a Conference of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, London, June 11.
Barber, M., and M. Mourshed. (2007). “How the World’s Best Performing Schools
Come Out on Top.” McKinsey & Company, New York, USA.
Barbour, R.S. (2008). Introducing Qualitative Research: A Student’s Guide to the
Craft of Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication.
Bazeley P (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. London: SAGE
Publications.
Bazeley P (2009). Analysing Qualitative Data: More than Identifying Themes.
Malaysian J. Qualitative Res., 2: 6-22.
Becker, H. J. and Riel, M. M. (1999). Teacher Professionalism and the Emergence of
Constructivist-Compatible Pedagogies. University of California, Irvine.
http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/special_report2/index.htm.
244
Becker, G.S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with
Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Belzer, A. (1998). The Pennsylvania Adult Literacy Practitioner Inquiry Network.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, (ED 427 222).
Benade, L. (2009). The New Zealand Draft Curriculum 2006: a Policy Case Study
with Specific Reference to its Understanding of Teaching as an Ethical Profession.
Policy Futures in Education, 7(1), 5. doi:10.2304/pfie.2009.7.1.5.
Benninga, J. (2003). Moral and Ethical Issues in Teacher Education. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 482 699).
Benson, P. (2000) Autonomy as a Learners’ and Teachers’ Right. In B. Sinclair, I.
McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future
Directions. London: Longman. 111-117.
Bernstein, D. J. (2008). Peer Review and Evaluation of the Intellectual Work on
Teaching Change, 40 (2), 48-51.
Bissaker, Kerry. (2001). Did They Get What They Came for? Evaluating Teachers’
Learning. International Education Journal. Vol. 2, No.4, pp. 41-52.
Bjork, C. (2003). Local Responses to Decentralisation Policy in Indonesia.
Comparative Education Review, 47(2), 184-216.
Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian Education: Teachers, Schools, Central Bureaucracy.
New York and London: Routledge.
BKM. (2014). Fraksi Golkar Soroti Kinerja Guru Bersertifikat. Di update, Sabtu 17
Mei 2014. http://m.beritakotamakassar.com/index.php/sulselbar/27169--fraksi-
golkar-soroti-kinerja-guru-bersertifikasi.html
Blackmore, J. (1996). Doing Emotion Labor in the Education Market Place: Stories
from the Field of Woman Management, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural politics
of Education. 17(3), 337-349.
Blackwell, Sarah and Pepper, Kaye. (2008). The Effect of Concept Mapping on
Preservice Teachers’ Reflective Practices when Making Pedagogical Decisions.
The Journal of Effective Teaching. Vol. 8, No. 2, 77-93.
Blandford, S. (2000). Managing Professional Development in Schools. Routledge.
London.
245
Blank, Rolf K. and de las Alas, Nina. (2009). Effects of Teacher Professional
Development on Gains in Student Achievement. National Science Foundation.
Washington: CCSSO.
Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education: An
Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Bond, Trevor G. and Fox, Christine M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model:
Fundamental Measurement in the Human Science. 2nd Edition. New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Borg, W.R. et al. (1996). Educational Research: An Introduction. 6th Edition,
Longman: New York, USA.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the
Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3 - 11.
Boyd, Donald J. et al. (2006). Complex by Design: Investigating Pathways into
Teaching in New York City Schools. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 57, No. 2,
pp. 155-166. DOI: 10.1177/0022487105285943.
Boyt, T. E., Lusch, R. F., and Naylor, G. (2001). The Role of Professionalism in
Determining Job Satisfaction in Professional Services: A Study of Marketing
Researchers. Journal of Service Research, 3 (4), 321-330.
Bray, M. and Percy K. (2003). Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring:
Conceptual Considerations, and Socio-Economic Patterns in Hong Kong.
Economics of Education Review, 22 (6), 611-620.
Bransford, JD, Brown, AL and Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind,
Experience, and School, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning,
National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Bryman, Alan (2006). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is It
Done?. SAGE Publications (London,Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) Vol.
6(1) 97–113.
Buchori, Mochtar. (1994). Pendidikan dan Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Bulach, Cletus R. and Berry, James. (2001). The Impact of Demographic Culture on
School Culture and Climate. Educational Leadership and Professionals Studies.
State University of Georgia.
246
Bull, B. L. (1998). The Nature of Teacher Autonomy. Revision of Paper Presented at
the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research. ERIC.
Burgess, R.G. (1984a). In the field: An Introduction to Field Research. London: Allen
and Unwin.
Burt, M. & Keenan, F. (1998). Trends in Staff Development for Adult ESL
Instructors. ERIC Q & A. Washington, DC: National Center for ESL Literacy
Education. (ED No. 423 711)
Butt, G. (1998). Interviewing Techniques in Educational Research.
Caena, Francesca. (2011). Quality in Teachers’ Continuing Professional
Development. Education and Training 2020 Thematic Working Group
Professional Development of Teachers. European Commission.
Calhoun, J, F., & Acocella, J, R. 1990. Psikologi tentang Penyesuaian dan Hubungan
Kemanusiaan. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.
Cardona-Molto, M. C. (2003). Mainstream Teachers’ Acceptance of Instructional
Adaptations in Spain. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(3), 311-
332.
Carmines, E.G. and Zeller, R.A. (1997). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage
University Paper Series on Quantitative Application in Social Sciences. Newbury
Park, California: Sage.
Cestone, C.M., Levine, R.E., & Lane, D.R. (2008). Peer Assessment and Evaluation
in Team-based Learning. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning.116(Winter),69-78
Caldwell, B.J. dan Spinks J.M. (1993). Leading the Self-Managing School. Second
Edition. London & Washington: The Falmer Press
Campbell, T. (1996). Technology, Multimedia, and Qualitative Research in
Education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(9), 122-133.
Campbell, E. (2003). Ethical Knowledge and Moral Agency as the Essence of
Applied Professional Ethics in Teaching. Professional Studies Review: An
Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 29–38.
Campbell, A. et al. (2004). Practitioner Research and Professional Development in
Education. Paul Chapman Publishing. London.
247
Carey, K. (2004). The Real Value of Teachers: Using New Information about
Teacher Effectiveness to Close the Achievement Gap. Thinking K–16, 8(1), 3–42.
Chapuis, Lea. (2003). Pedagogy: Embedding Learning Technologies (Modul 1).
Australian Education and Training.
Chaudhury, J. et al. (2006). Missing in Action: Teacher and Health Worker Absences
in Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (1), 91-116.
Chrisiana, Wanda. (2005). Upaya Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter bagi Mahasiswa:
Studi Kasus di Jurusan Teknik Industri UK Petra. Artikel Jurnal Teknik Industry.
Vol. 7, No. 1. Surabaya: Universitas Kristen Petra.
Clarke, P. (2005). Improving Schools in Difficultly. Continuum. London.
Clarke D. and Hollingsworth H. (2002). Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional
Growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
Clement, john (2000). Model Based Learning as a Key Research Area for Science
Education. International Journal for Science Education. Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1041-
1053.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2004a). Taking Stock in 2004: Teacher Education in Dangerous
times. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 55, pp. 3-7.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning Policy: When State Education Reform
Works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cohen, D. and Hill, H. (2000), “Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The
Mathematics Reform in California.” Teachers College Record, 102: 294-343.
Cohen, D.K. and Spillane, J. (1992). Policy and Practice: The Relations between
Governance and Instruction. Washinton D.C.: American Educational Research
Association.
Cole, Peter (2004). Professional Development: A Great Way to Avoid Change.
Published by IARTV, Melbourne, December 2004 Seminar Series No. 140.
Conley, S., Schmiddle, T., and Shedd, J. (1988). Teacher Perticipation in the
Management of School System. Teacher College Record, Vol. 90, pp. 259-80.
Cood, J. (2005). Education Policy and the Challenges of Globalisation, in J. Cood &
K. Sullivan, Education Policy Directions in Aotearoa New Zeland. Southbank:
Thomson Dunmore Press.
248
Coolahan, J. (2002), “Teacher Education and the Teaching Career in an Era of
Lifelong Learning”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 2, OECD Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/226408628504.
Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B. and Evans, D. (2003). The Impact of
Collaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning. In Research Evidence in
Education Library. Version 1.1. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research
Unit, Institute of Education.
Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S. and Firth, A. (2005a). The Impact of
Collaborative Continuing Professional Development (CPD) on Classroom
Teaching and Learning. Review: How do Collaborative and Sustained CPD and
Sustained but not Collaborative CPD Affect Teaching and Learning? In Research
Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research
Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Coyne, IT. (1997). Sampling in Qualitative Research: Purposeful and Theoretical
Sampling; Merging or Clear Boundaries. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26, 623-
630.
Creswell,J. W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating
Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Method Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating
Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition). Boston: Pearson Education,
Inc.
Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.
Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and Internal of Tests. Psychometrika. 16,
297-334.
Cruess, Richard L. et. al. 2000. Professionalism: An Ideai to be Sustained. Centre for
Medical Education. The Lancet. Vol. 356, p. 156-59.
CUPE. (2009). Roles and Responsibilities of Teachers and Teacher
Assistants/Education Assistants. British Columbia Teacher’s Federation.
249
Dahrin, D. (2000). Memperbaiki Kinerja Pendidikan Nasional Secara Komprehensip:
Transformasi Pendidikan. Komunitas, Forum Rektor Indonesia. Vol.1 No. Hlm.
24.
Danim, Sudarwan. (2010). Otonomi Manajemen Sekolah. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Developing Professional Development Schools: Early
Lessons, Challenge, and Promise. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Professional
Development Schools: Schools for Developing a Profession (pp. 1-27). New York:
Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that Support
Professional Development in an Era of Reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “High-qualified Teachers”:
What does “Scientifically-based Research” Actually Tell us? Educational
Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
David, C. (2000). Professionalism and Ethics in Teaching. London: Taylor&Francis
Books Ltd.
Davies, L. (1995). Qualitative Approaches in Educational Research. EM05: Unit 4,
School of Education and Continuing Studies, University of Birmingham.
Day, Ch. (1997) In-Service Teacher Education in Europe: Conditions and Themes for
Development in the 21st Century. British Journal of In-service Education, Vol. 23.
No.1, 1997, p.42.
Day, C. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. Routledge Falmer. London.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variation in Condition for Teachers’ Professional Learning
and Development: Sustaining Commitment and Effectiveness over a Career.
Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423-443, doi:10.1080/03054980701450746,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450746.
Demirkasimoglu, Nihan. (2010). Defining Teacher Professionalism from Different
Perspective. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 9 (2010)2047-2051.
WCLTA 2010.
DeMonte, Jenny. (2013). High-Quality Professional Development for Teachers:
Supporting Teacher Training to Improve Student Learning. Centre for American
Progress.
250
Denzin, N.K. (1997). Triangulation in Educational Research. In Keeves, J.P.(Eds.),
Educational Research, Methodology, And Measurement: An International
Handbook, 2nd. Edition, UK: Pergamon, pp. 318-322.
Depdiknas. (2011). Standar Sarana Prasarana Pendidikan. Jakarta: Indonesia.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills. (2010). Science and Mathematics
Secondary Education for the 21st Century: Report of the Science and Learning
Expert Group. London, HMSO.
Department of Education and Training. (2004). Competency Framework for
Teachers. The Government of Western Australia.
Denscombe, M. (1998). The Good Research Guide: For Small-scale Social Research
Projects. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional
Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational
Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Desimone, L.M. (2011, March). A Primer on Effective Professional Development.
Kappan, 92(6), 68-71.
DfEE [Department for Education and Employment] .(1998). Teachers: Meeting
the Challenge of Change Green Paper London: DfEE.
DIKNAS. 2007. Rambu-rambu Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesional Guru
Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Indonesia.
Direktorat Profesi Pendidik (2008). Pedoman Penilaian Guru Berprestasi. Jakarta :
Depdiknas.
Dodds, M. (2001). Continuing Professional Development Nurturing the Expert
within. In Soler, J., Craft, A., & Burges, H. (Eds.). Teachers’ Development:
Exploring our own Practice. London, Paul Chapman Publishing and the Open
University.
Downie, R. S. (1990). Professions and Professionalism. Journal of Philosophy of
Education, 24(2), 147-159.
Duckworth, Kathryn et al. (2009). Self-Regulated Learning: A Literature Review.
Centre for Research on Wider Benefits of Learning. Institute of Education
University of London.
251
Dweck, Carrol S. (2008). Can Personality be Changed? The Role of Beliefs in
Personality and Change. Association for Psychological Sciences. Vol. 17(6), 391-
394.
Easton, L. B. (2008). From Professional Development to Professional Learning. Phi
Delta Kappan, 89(10), 755-759.
Edstam, Tina Scott. (1998). Perceptions of Professionalism among Elementary
School English as a Second Language Teachers. Unpublished Dessertation. USA:
The University of Minnesota.
Education Council. (2001). The Concrete Future Objectives of Education and
Training Systems/Report from the Education Council to the European Council,
Brussels,3112001,Com.(2001)59final. Available at:
http://europa.eu.int/comm./education/doc/official/keydoc/com20001/ com2001-
059el.pdf.
Eisner, E. and Peshkin, A. (eds). (1990). Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The
Continuing Debate. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ekiz, D. (2004). Teacher Professionalism and Curriculum Change: Primary School
Teachers’ Views of the New Science Curriculum. Kastamonu Education Journal,
12(2).
Elmore, R.F. (2004). School Reform from the Inside Out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Engvall, R. (1997). The Professionalization of Teaching. New York: University
Press of America, Inc.
Epstein, G. (2009). Rethinking Monetary and Financial Policy: Practical Suggestions
for Monitoring Financial Stability while Generating Employment and Poverty
Reduction,” Employment Sector, Employment Working Paper No. 37,
International Labor Office, Geneva.
Erin Wehr-Flowers (2006). Differences between Male and Female Students'
Confidence, Anxiety, and Attitude toward Learning Jazz Improvisation. Journal of
Research in Music Education, Vol. 54, No. 4, (Winter, 2006), pp. 337-349.
ETS. (2004). Where We Stand on Teacher Quality. The Teacher Quality Series.
Princeton: New Jersey. www.ets.org.
252
European Commission. (2007). Communication from the European Commission to
the European Parliament: Improving the Quality of Teacher Education. Brussels,
August 2007.
Eurydice. (2008). Level of Autonomy and Responsibilities of Teachers in Europe.
Brussel : Begium.
Eurydice (2009).Key Data on Education in Europe 2009. Brussels: Eurydice
Publications.
Evans, L . (2008). Professionalism, Professionality and the Development of Education
Professionals, British Journal of Educational Studies. 56(1). pp. 20-38.
Evetts, J. (2009). New Professionalism and New Public Management: Changes,
Continuities and Consequences. Comparative Sociology 8 (2), 247-266.
Fareo, Dorcas Oluremi. (2013). Professional Development of Teachers in
Africa: A Case Study of Nigeria. An Online journal of the African
Educational Research Network. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.63-68.
Fayumi, Badriyah et al. (2001). Keadilan dan Kesetaraan Jender: Perspektif Islam.
Departemen Agama RI: Jakarta, halaman xii.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From Preparation to Practice: Designing a Continuum to
Strengthen and Sustain Teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00141.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher Learning. How do Teachers learn to teach? In
Cochran-Smith, M, Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, D. (Eds.). Handbook of
research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts. New
York/Abingdon: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis.
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for Public Education: New Evidence on How and
Why Money Matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465-498.
Ferrance, Eileen. (2000). Action Research: Themes in Education. LAB Education
Alliance. USA: Brown University.
Fetterman, David M. (1989). Ethnography Step by Step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Figlio, D. (1997). Teacher Salaries and Teacher Quality. Economics Letters, 267-272.
Firman, H. (2005). Peranan Kegiatan Piloting IMSTEP dalam Peningkatan
Profesionalisme guru (The Role of Piloting IMSTEP in Improving Teacher
253
Professionalism). Paper Presented at Exchange Experiences IMSTEP Working
Group Conference. Universitas Negeri Malang. September 5-6, 2005.
Fischer, Gerhard (n.d). Lifelong Learning-More than Training. Center for LifeLong
Learning & Design (L3D) Department of Computer Science and Institute of
Cognitive Science. University of Colorado: Boulder.
Flick, U. (2006). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (3rd Edition). Thousand
Oaks. Sage.
Florida Department of Education. (2010). Professional Development System
Evaluation Protocol. Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and
Retention. It is available on: http://www.teachingflorida.com/professonal
Fox, C.J. (1992). What Do We Mean When We Say Professionalism? A Language
Usage Analysis fo Public administration. The American Review of Public
Administration, 22(1), 1-17.
Forster, P. (1996). Chapter 3: Observational Research. In Sapsford, R. & Jupp, V.
(Eds.). Data Collection and Analysis. London: Sage Publication, pp.57-93.
Forsyth, P.B., and Danisiewicz, T.J. (1985). Toward a Theory of Professionalization.
Work and Occupations, 12(1), 59-76.
Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L. and Mckinney, S. 2007. Teachers Continuing
Professional Development: Contested Concepts, Understanding and Models.
Professional Development in Education 33 (2): 153-169.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The Third Logic. Chicago: University of
Chicago.
Friedman, R. (1999). Teacher-perceived Work Autonomy: The Concept and Its
Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1998). Researchers and Teachers Working Together to
Improve Instruction for Diverse Learners. Learning Disabilities Research &
Practice, 13, 126–137.
Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change, 1 Edition. New York
City: Teachers College Press.
254
Fullan, M.G. (1995). The Limits and the Potential of Professional Development. In T.
Guskey and M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional Development in Education: New
Paradigms and Practices (pp. 253-267). New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco, Jossey Bass.
Fullan, M. (2007a). Change the Terms for Teacher Learning. Journal of Staff
Development, 28(3), 35-36.
Furlong, J. 2000. Intuition and the Crisis in Teacher Professionalism. In: T. Atkinson
and G. Claxton, eds. The Intuitive Practitioner of the Value of not Always
Knowing What One is Doing: 15-31. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University
Press.
Gaible, E. and Burns, M. 2005. Using Technology to Train Teachers [Online].
Available from info DEV: http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.13.html.
Galabawa, J. C. J. (2001). Advocacy, Mobilization and Partnership for Education and
Literacy for All in Tanzania: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. Papers in
Education and Development, 21, 1-13.
Gambell, T. (2004). Teachers Working Around Large-Scale Assessment:
Reconstructing Professionalism and Professional Development TREVOR
GAMBELL, 3(2), 48-73.
Ganser, T. (2000). An Ambitious Vision of Professional Development for
Teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 84(618), 6-12.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What
Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of
Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Garland, Ron. (1991). The Mid-Point on a Raring Scale: Is It Desirable?. Research
Note 3. Marketing Bulleting, Vol.2, pp. 66-70. http://marketing-
bulletin.massey.ac.nz/
Garret, Kristi. (2010). Professional Learning Communities Professional Learning
Culture to Root. California School.
Garrison R, Anderson T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for
Research and Practice. Routledge Falmer, London.
255
Gewirtz, S., P. Manony, I. Hextall, and A. Cribb. 2009. Policy, Professionalism and
Practice: Understanding and Enhancing Teachers’ Work. In: S. Gewirtz, P.
Manony, I. Hextall, and A. Cribb, eds. Changing Teacher Professionalism.
International Trends, Challenges and the Way Forward: 3-16. Oxon: Routledge.
Glazer, J. (1999). Considering the Professional Community: An Analysis of Key
Ideas, Intellectual Roots, and Future Challenges. Paper Presented at the American
Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April, 1999.
Goe, L. (2007). The Link between Teacher Quality and Student Outcomes: A
Research Synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher
Quality. Retrieved from http://www.tqsource.org/link.php.
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative
Research. The Qualitative Report. Ontario: University of Toronto.
Goodson, I. and Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers' Professional Lives: Aspirations and
Actualities. Teachers' Professional Lives. London: Falmer Press.
Goos, M., Stillman, G., & Vale, C. (2007). Teaching Secondary School
Mathematics. Research and Practice for the 21st Century. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Grant, Carl A. (1979). Community Participation in Education. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual
Framework for Mixed Methods Evaluation Design. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
Gregory, I. (2003). Ethics in Research. London: Continuun.
Gregson, James A. and Sturko, Patricia A. (2007).Teachers as Adult Learners: Re-
conceptualizing Professional Development. Journal of Adult Education. Vol.
XXXVI, No. 1. Pp. 1-18.
Gruenert, S. (1998). School Culture Survey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Missouri, Columbia.
GTCE.( n.d). The Professional Professional Learning Framework.
http://www.canterbury.ac.uk/education/protected/ppss/docs/professional-learning-
and-development-gtce.pdf.
256
Guerrero, P. R. (1999). Evaluation Capacity Development: Comparative Insight from
Colombia, China and Indonesia. In Boyke, and Lemaire, D. (Eds.), Building
Effective Evaluation Capacity: Lessons from Practice. New Brunswick:
Transaction Publisher.
Gulamhussein, Allison. (2013). Teaching the Teacher Effective Professional
Development in an Era of High Stakes Accountability. Center for Public
Education.
Gurney, Philip. (2007). Five Factors for Effective Teaching. New Zealand Journal of
Teachers’ Work. Vol.(4) 2, 89-98.
Guskey, T.R. (1995). Professional Development in Education: In Search of the
Optimal Mix. In T. Guskey and M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional Development in
Education: New Paradigms and Practices (pp. 114-131) New York: Teachers
College Press.
Guskey, T.R. (1995). Professional Development in Education: In Search of the
Optimal mix. In T. Guskey and M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional Development in
Education: New Paradigms and Practices (pp. 114-131) New York: Teachers
College Press.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change.
Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teacher and
Teaching: Theory and Practice 8(3/4): 381-390.
Guskey, T. R., & Huberman, M. (Eds.). (1995). Professional Development in
Education: New Paradigms and Practices. New York, NY:Teachers College
Press.
Guskey, T. R. & Sparks, D. (2002). Linking Professional Development to
Improvements in Student Learning. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and
Culture in the Postmodern Age. London, Casell.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning.
Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice. Vol.6,2. pp.151-182.
257
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of
Insecurity. Maidenhead: Open University press.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, B., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to Change:
Teaching beyond Subjects and Standards. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hargreaves, A. & Fullan M. G. (Eds.) (1992). Understanding Teacher Development.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Harian Kompas. (2012). Hasil Uji Kompetensi Guru Masih di bawah Harapan.
http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2012/08/03/079421057/Hasil-Uji-Kompetensi-
Guru-Masih-di-Bawah-Harapan.
Harian Tribun Timur Makassar. (2012). Seribu Guru Ikut Seminar ICT.
http://makassar.tribunnews.com/2012/10/14/1.000-guru-ikut-seminar-ict.
Harris A. (2001). Improving Schools through Teacher Leadership. Educational
Journal. Issue 59, pp.22-23.
Harris, Alma and Muijs, Daniel (2003) Teacher Leadership: A Review of Research.
National School for Leadership. University of Warwick.
Harslett, M. et al. (2000). Teacher Perceptions of the Characteristics of Effective
Teachers of Aboriginal Middle School Students. The Australian Journal of
Teacher Education, 25,2, available at: ajte.education.ecu.edu.au
Harwood, T. and Clarke, J. 2006. Grounding Continuous Professional Development
(CPD). Teaching Practice 43 (1): 29-39.
Hawley, W.D., & Valli, L. (1999). The Essentials of Effective Professional
Development: A New Consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.),
Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook for Policy and Practice (pp. 127-
150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Haycock, K. (1998). Good Teaching Matters a Lot. Thinking K-16, 3(2), 3–14.
Henke, R., Chen, X., and Geis, S. (2000). Progress through the Teacher Pipeline:
1992-93 College Graduates and Elementary/Secondary School Teaching as of
1997. (NCES 2000-152). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for
Education Statistics. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
258
Hilferty, Fiona, (2008). Teacher Professionalism and Cultural Diversity: Skill,
Knowledgwe and Values for Changing Australia. The Australian Educational
Researcher. Vol. 35, No.3.
Hilton, S., & Southgate, L. (2007). Professionalism in Medical Education. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 23, 265-279, doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.024,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.024.
Holt, John. (1964). How Children Fail. USA: Pitman Publishing Company.
Hornby. (1974). Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary.
Hoyle, E. (1980). Professionalization and De-professionalization in Education, in E.
Hoyle & J. Megard. The Professional Development of Teachers: World Year Book
of Education. London: Kogan Page.
Hoyle, E. (2001). Teaching: Prestige, status and esteem. Educational Management &
Administration, 29:2, 139–152.
Hoyle, E., & John, P. D. (Eds.)., 1995, Professional Knowledge and Professional
Practice, London: Cassell.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (1984). Innovation up Close: How School
Improvement Works. New York: Plenum.
Huff, A. S. (2009). Designing Research for Publication. Singapore: Sage
Publications.
Hurst, B., and Reding, G. (2000). Professionalism in Teaching. Upper Saddle River,
N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Hussein, Ashatu (2009). The Use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research: Can
Qualitative and Quantitative mMethods be Combined?. Journal of Comparative
Social Work, 1-12.
Ibrahim, Bafadal. (2004). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar.
Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.
Ifanti, Amalia A. and Fotopoulopou, Vasiliki, S. (2011). Teacher’ Perceptions of
Professionalism and professional Development: A Case Study in Greece. World
journal of Education, 1(1). P.40-50. Doi: 10.5430/wje.vln1p40.
International Labor Office (ILO). (2010). A Skilled Workforce for Strong,
Sustainable and Balanced Growth: A G20 Strategy Training. Geneva: Switzerland.
259
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational
Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 499–534.
Ingersoll, Richard M. 2007. Misdiagnosing the Teacher Quality Problem. Research in
Education Policy and Finance. University of Pennsylvania.
Jablon, Judy R. and Wilkinson, Michael. (2006). Using Engagement Strategies to
Facilitate Students’ Learning and Success. Beyond the Journal.
http://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200603/JablonBTJ.pdf.
Johnson, C. C., & Fargo, J. D. (2010). Urban School Reform Enabled by
Transformative Professional Development: Impact on Teacher Change and Student
Learning of Science. Urban Education, 45, 4-29. doi:
10.1177/0042085909352073.
Johnson, K.E. (1992). The Relationship between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices
during Literacy Instruction for Non-native Speakers of English. Journal of Reading
Behavior, 14(1), 83-108.
Johnson, S. M., Birkeland, S., Kardos, S. M., Kauffman, E. L., Liu, E., & Peske, H.
G. (July/ August. 2001). Retaining the Next Generation of Teachers: The
Importance of School-bases Support. Harvard Education Letter,
Jones, P., & Song, L. 2005. Action Research Fellows at Towson University.
http://www.nipissingu.ca/oar/PDFS/V832E.pdf.
Kalantzis, M. and Cope, B. (2003) Designs for Learning (Draft 2003). RMIT.
Karsidi, Ravik. ( 2005). Profesionalisme Guru dan Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di
Era Otonomi Daerah, Makalah dalam Seminar Pendidikan Nasional, Wonogiri,
23 Juli 2005.
Katane, Irena et al. “Teacher Competence and Further Education as Priorities for
Sustainable Development of Rural School in Latvia.” Journal of Teacher
Education and Training. 6. 2006:41-59.
Keiny, S. (1994). Constructivism and Teachers’ Professional Development. Teaching
and Teacher Education. Vol.10 (2), pp. 157– 167.
Keisa, V. (2009). Analysis of Teacher’s Professional Development. Paper Presented
at the International Scientifical Conference on Society, Integration, Education.
Rezekne, Latvia, Feb 27-28, 2009.
260
Kemdiknas. PMPTK. 2006. Lampiran Peraturan Menteri No 22/2006. Kemag,
Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Sertifikasi Guru dalam Jabatan Tahun
2011: Pedoman Penetapan Peserta. Jakarta: Indoneisa
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Rencana Strategis Kementerian
Pendidikan Nasional 2010-2014. Jakarta: Indonesia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Daftar Tabel Data Pendidikan Sekolah
Menengah Atas (Sma) Tahun 2009/2010.
http://www.psp.kemdiknas.go.id/uploads/Statistik%20Pendidikan/0910/index_sma
_0910.pdf.
Khan, Parveen and Iqbal, Mohammad. (2012). Role of Physical Facilities in Teaching
Learning Process. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business.
Vol.4 (3), pp. 210-216.
Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational
Definitions. Nursing Research, 40(6), 364-366.
King, B. & Newmann, F. (2004). Key Link: Successful Professional Development
must Consider School Capacity. Journal of Staff Development, 25(1), 26-30.
Kirkey, T. L. 2005. Differentiated Instruction and Enrichment Opportunities: An
Action Research Report. http://www.nipissingu.ca/oar/PDFS/V833E.pdf.
Kis, Arzu and Akcamete, A. Gonul. (2013). The Impact of the Educator Study Group
Model on the Professional Development of Teachers of Mainstream Elementary
Classrooms. Academic Research International. Vol. 4, No.4, pp.524-534.
Knowles, M. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy Versus
Pedagogy. Revised and updated. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult
Education.
Knowles, M. (1983). Adults are not Grown up Children as Learners. Community
Services Catalyst, 13(4), 4-8.
Knowles, M.S, Holton III, E.F, & Swanson, R.A. (2005). The Adult learner (6th Ed.).
London: Elsevier.
261
Kohler, F.W., Henning, J., & Usma-Wilches, J. (2008). Preparing Pre-service
Teachers to Make Instructional Decisions: An Examination of the Teacher Work
Sample. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2108-2117.
Kosgei, Anita et al. (2013). Influence of Teacher Characteristics on Students’
Academic Achievement among Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and
Practice. Vol. 4, No. 3. ISSN: 2222-88X.
Kotler, P., Jatusripitak, S., and Maesincee, S. (1997). The Marketing of Nation: A
Strategic Approach to Building Nation Wealth. New York: The Free Press.
Kramer, Pamela A. (2003). The ABC’s of Professionalism. Kappa Delta Pi Record,
40(1), 22-25.
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M. & Jordan,
A. (2008). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Content Knowledge of Secondary
Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716-725.
Krejcie, R.V. and Daryle W. Morgan. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research
Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30, 607-610.
Krippendorff, K. (2004b). Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common
Misconceptions and Recommendations. Human Communication Research 30(3),
411-433.
Krishnaveni, R. ve Anitha, J. (2007). Educators’ Professional Characteristics. Quality
Assurance in Education, 15 (2), 149-161.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., and Hurd, J. (2004). A Deeper Look at Lesson Study.
Educational Leadership. 61 (5).
Liakopoulou, Maria. (2011). The Professional Competence of Teachers:
Which Qualities, Attitudes, Skills and Knowledge Contribute to a Teacher’s
Effectiveness? International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Vol. 1(21), 66-78.
Lieberman, A. & Pointer Mace, D. (2008). Teacher Learning: the Key to Education
Reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 226-234.
Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. (2002). From Network Learning to Classroom Teaching.
Journal of Educational Change, 3, 315-337.
262
Little, J. (1993). Teachers' Professional Development in a Climate of Educational
Reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
Littlejohn, S.W. and Foss, K.A. (2004). Theories of Human Communication.
Belmont, Los Angeles: Wadsworth.
Livingstone, David W. (2004). The Learning Society: Past, Present, and Future
Views. Centre for the Study of Education and Work. Toronto: Canada.
Locke, Terry. (2001). Questions of Professionalism Change: Transformation in
Education. Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 30-50.
Loeb, S., & Page, M. (2000). Examining the Link between Teacher Wages and
Student Outcomes: The Importance of Alternative Labor Market Opportunities and
Non-pecuniary Variation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 393-408.
Loucks-Horsley, S. & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). Using Knowledge of Change to Guide
Staff Development. In. A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff Development for
Education in the 90s: New Demands, New Realities, New Perspectives (2nd ed.)
(pp. 15-36). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lumpkin, Angela. (2008). Teachers as Role Model Teaching Characters and Moral
Virtues, JOPERD, vol. 79, no. 2.
Lyons. (2012). Do School Facilities Really Impact a Child’s Education. An
Introduction to the Issues. School Facilities.com/pdf/school%20 Facilities%20
facilities%202012-01pdf. Dated: 24/01/2012.
Madhavaram, S., Laverie, D.A. (2010). Developing Pedagogical Competence: Issues
and Implications for Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, vol.
XX, no X, pp. 2-10.
Maister, DH. 1997. True Professionalism. New York: The Free Press.
Maklassa (2014). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Motivasi, Sarana dan Prasarana Terhadap
Kinerja Guru dan Kualitas Pendidikan di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, Unpublished
dissertation. Universitas Muslim Indonesia. Makassar.
Malikow, M. (2005). Effective Teacher Study. National Forum of Teacher Education
Journal electronic, 16,3, available at: www.nationalforum.com/ Archives.htm.
Mantja, Willem. (2002). Manajemen Pendidikan dan Supervisi Pengajaran. Malang:
Wineka Media.
263
Manurung, Rosida Tiurma. (2008). Terhempasnya Wibawa Guru: Suatu Kajian
Kontrastif Karya Sastra Masa Kini dan Masa Lalu. Jurnal sosioteknology, Vol.
(15) (7), pp. 510-516.
Marimuthu, M; Ariokasamy, L., and Ismail, M. (2009). Human Capital Development
and its Impact on Firms Performance: Evidence from Developmental Economics.
The Journal of International Social Research. Vol. 2(8), pp. 265-272.
Marrow, W. (2007). Learning to Teach in South Africa. HSRC Press. Cape Town.
Martin, Lorna (2005). School Partnership: A Guide for Parents, Schools, and
Comunities. Manitoba Education and Youth.
Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach.
London: Sage.
McAteer, M., Foster, R., Groves, J., Hallet, F., Jones, M., and Rutter, T. (2005).
Continuing Professional Development: Exploring the Impact on Teachers’
Professional Practice and Pupil Learning. Paper presented at BERA annual
conference, University of Glamorgan, 14 – 17 September 2005.
McCaffrey, J. R., Lockwood, D. F., Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2003).
Evaluating Value Added Models for Teacher Accountability [Monograph]. Santa
Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from
http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2004/RAND_MG158.pdf.
McCormick R, and Scrimshaw P (2001) Information and Communications
Technology, Knowledge and Pedagogy. Educ. Communication. Info. 1 (1): 37-57.
McIntosh, J. E. 2005. Valuing the Collaborative Nature of Professional Learning
Communities. Tersedia pada http://www.nipissingu.ca/oar/PDFS/V82E.pdf. Diakses
pada tanggal 4 Juli 2007.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand Change Agent Study Revisited: Macro
Perspectives and Micro Realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional Communities and the Work
of High School Teaching. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
McMahon,W.W. et al. (2001). Improving Education Finance in Indonesia, Policy
Research Center, Institute for Research and Development. Jakarta: MONE,
UNICEF, and UNESCO.
264
Mehrens, W.A. and Lehman, I.J. (1991). Measurement and Evaluation in Education
and Psychology. 4th Edition. Orlando FL. Harcourt-Brace Jovanovich College
Publisher.
Meiers, M., & Ingvarson, L. (2005). Investigating the Links between Teacher
Professional Development and Student Learning Outcomes. Melbourne:
Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative Research and Case Study Application in
Education. Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative Research in Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M.B, and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded
Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Sydney: SAGE Publication.
Ministry of Human Resources of India. (2010). ICT for Education in India and South
Asia: ICT in School Education (Primary and Secondary). New Delhi: Price
Waterhouse Coopers.
Misbahuddin. (2013). The Development of Teacher Profession. Thesis. Program
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar. April.
Mizell, Hayes (2010). Why Professional Development Matters. Learning Forward.
Ohio: United States of America.
MoE Indonesian. (2009). Education Statistics. Retrieved June 4, 2009, from
http://www.depdiknas.go.id/.
Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Moh. Najib Abdul Gaffar. (2003). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Penyelidikan.
Johor Baharu: University Technology of Malaysia.
Mok Soon Sang. (2008). Literature dan Kaedah Penyelidikan. Penerbitan Multimedia
Sdn. Bhd.
Moore, A. (2004). The Good Teacher. Routledge Falmer. London.
Mosha, H. J. (2004). New Direction in Teacher Education for Quality Improvement
in Africa. Papersin Education and Development, 24, 45-68.
265
Muhson, Ali.(2004). Meningkatkan Professionalisme Guru: Sebuah Harapan. Jurnal
Ekonomi dan Pendidikan. Vol.2(1), 90.
Mundry, S. (2005). Changing Perspectives in Professional Development. Science
Educator, 14(1), 9-15.
Murdoch, K. (1998). Classroom Connections, Strategies for Integrated Learning.
Curtain Publishing.
Murnane, R. J. (1996). The Impact of School Resources on the Learning of Inner-city
Children. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Mustofa (2007). Upaya Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru di Indonesia. Jurnal
Ekonomi dan Pendidikan. Vol. 4, No. 1., Pp. 76-88.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What Matters
Most: Teaching for America’s Future. New York: NCTAF.
National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (2008). What do We Mean
by Professional Development in the Early Childhood Field? Chapel Hill: The
University of North Carolina.
National Policy on Teacher Supply, Utilization and Development (1996). Dept. of
Education. Pretoria.
National Research Council. 2007. Enhancing Professional Development for
Teachers: Potential Uses of Information Technology (report of a workshop:
Committee on Enhancing Professional Development for Teachers, National
Academies Teacher Advisory Council, Center for Education. Washington, D.C:
The national Academies press.
National Staff Development Council. (2001). Standards for Staff Development
(Revised). Oxford, OH: NSDC.
National Staff Development Council (2009a). NSDC Standards: Learning. Retrieved
June 30, 2009 from http://www.nsdc.org/standards/learning.cfm.
National Staff Development Council (2009b). NSDC Standards: Learning
Communities. Retrieved June 30, 2009 from
http://www.nsdc.org/standards/learningcommunities.cfm.
Naumescu, Adrienne Kozan. (2008). Science Teacher Competencies in a
Knowledged Based Society. Acta Didactica Napocenzia. Vol. 1, No. 1, p.25-30.
266
Nestor, P. I., & Leary, P. (2000). The Relationship between Tenure and Non-tenure
Track Status of Extension Faculty and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Extension,
38(4). Retrieved March 24, 2004, from
http://www.joe.org/joe/2000august/rb1.html.
Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social Research Method: Qualitative and Quantitative
Methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Nielsen, Dean H. 1996. Reform to Teacher Education in Indonesia: Does More Mean
Better?. Research Paper. World Bank Teacher Development Project.
Nkabinde, Z.P. (1997). An analysis of Educational Challenges in the New South
Africa. University Press of America, Inc. Maryland.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. Addison-Wesley Publishing
Company, Reading, MA.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Commission. (2009). Standards for
graduate teacher candidates. Retrieved from
http://soe.unc.edu/academics/requirements/ standards2010/NCDPI 2009 Graduate
Teacher Candidate Standards.pdf.
Novitasari, Ika. (2011). Sindikasi Jual Beli Kunci Jawaban Ujian Nasional 2010:
Studi Kasus Jaringan Jual Beli Kunci Jawaban Ujian Nasional 2010 di Kota X.
Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, Vol. 7, No. II, pp. 267-286
OECD. 2005. Teachers Matters. Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective
Teachers - Final Report: Teachers Matter. Paris: OECD.
OECD and TALIS. (2010). Teachers’ Professional Development: Europe in
International Comparison. Luxembourg: European Union.
OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, Strong Performers and
Successful Reformers in Education. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-
operation
OECD. (2011). Building High-Quality Teaching Profession: Lesson from Around the
World. OECD Publishing Paris.
267
OECD report. (2008). Financial Education Programmes in Schools: Analysis of
Selected Current Programs and Literature and INFE Case Study Report on
Financial Education at School and the Comparison of Learning Framework on
Financial Education (documents available at www.financial-education.org .
O’Neil, William F. (2001). Ideologi-Ideologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
Pelajar.
Oxfam. (2003). The IMF and the Millennium Goals: failing to deliver for low income
countries,” Oxfam Briefing Paper No. 54, September.
Stevenson, Angus and Lindberg, Christine A. (Eds.). (2010). Oxford American
Dictionary. United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
Pajak, E. (2001). Clinical Supervision in Standards-based Environment:
Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Teacher Education 52(3): 233–43.
Patahuddin, S.M. (2009). Model Pengembangan Profesi Guru Secara Otentik.
Simposium Nasional Penelitian dan Inovasi Pendidikan. Balitbang: Jakarta.
Patrinos, H. and Kagia, R. (2007). Maximizing the Performance of Education
Systems: The Case of Teacher Absenteeism. Washington: World Bank.
Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park,
CA: Sage.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What
Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies that Foster Curriculum
Implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 74 Tahun 2008 Tentang Guru.
Jakarta : Indonesia.
Perez, M., Anand, P., Speroni, C., Parrish, T., Esra, P., Socias, M., & Gubbins, P.
(2007). Successful California Schools in the Context of Educational Adequacy.
Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Perraton, H., Creed C., and Robinson, B. (2002). Teacher Education Guidelines:
Using Open and Distance Learning. Paris: UNESCO.
268
Perry, R., and Lewis, C. (2009). What is Successful Adaptation of Lesson Study in
the US? Journal of Educational Change, 10 (4), 365-391.
Pettey-Taylor, Sharon. (2004). Engaging and Supporting Students in Learning. The
Professional Teaching Standards. New Teacher Center at the University of
California, Santa Cruz.
Petty, G. (2002). Teaching Today. Stanley Thornes. United Kingdom.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichaels’ Manual of Child
Psychology (3rd ed.) (Vol. I), New York: Wiley.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, Measurement, and
Improvement of Classroom Processes: Standardized Observation Can Leverage
Capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109-119.
Pitout, D.N. et al. (1993). Teacher’s Handbook for Education. J.L. van Schaik.
Pretoria.
PMPTK (Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan).
(2008). Program Peningkatan Kualifikasi Pendidik. Presentasi dibawakan saat
Lokakarya Evaluasi Sektor Pendidikan.
Podhorsky, C. & Moore, V. 2006. Issues in Curriculum: Improving Instructional
Practice through Lesson Study. Tersedia pada http://www.lessonstudy.net. Diakses
pada tangal 15 Agustus 2007.
Porter, A., Garet, M., Desimone, L., & Birman, B. (2003). Providing Effective
Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Science
Educator, 12(1), 23-40.
Preedy, Margareth. (1993). Managing the Effective School. London: Paul Chapman
Publishing.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In Search of How
People Change. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
Purba, Janulis P. (2005). Action Research to Increase Teacher’s Professionalism in
Engineering. The fifth Comparative Education Society of Asia Biennial
Conference. University Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Purwanto (2004). Professionalisme Guru. Diambil dari http://www.Pustekkon.
Go.id/teknodit/t10/10-7.htm pada tanggal 16 Oktober 2004.
269
Pusat Statistik Pendidikan. (2012). Data Kualifikasi Guru Indonesia. Jakarta:
Indonesia.
Quick, H., Holtzman, D. & Chaney, K. (2009). Professional Development and
Instructional Practice: Conceptions and Evidence of Effectiveness. Journal of
Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 14(1), 45-71.
Quint, J. (2006). Meeting Five Critical Challenges of High School Reform: Lessons
from Research on Three Reform Models. New York: Manpower Demonstration
Research Corporation.
Rafiuddin Afkari bin Hj. Abdul Fattah (2010). Peranan, Strategi dan Pola
Pengembangan Pendidikan Mewujudkan Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM) di Inhil
yang Berwawasan Maju dan Gemilang 2025. Telah Dibentangkan dalam Seminar
Nasional "Wujudkan Tembilahan Kota Pendidikan Menuju Indragiri Berjaya dan
Gemilang 2025, pada Disember 2011 Dewan Engku Kelana Indragiri Tembilahan
Riau 2010. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
Raymond, S. M. (2006). Professionalism and Identity in Teacher Education:
Implications for Reform. Unpublished Dissertation. Northern Arizona University.
Reeves, Jenny. (2007). Inventing the Chartered Teacher. British Journal of
Educational Studies. Vol. 55, No. 1. Pp. 56-76.
Report, Country Seminar, UNESCO, Implementation, E. F. A., & Management, R.
(2006). Decentralization of Education in Indonesia, (January 2005), 6-8.
Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher
Attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Research in TESOL. Great Britain: Palgrave
Mcmillan.
Richards, L. and Morse, J. M. (2007). Read me first a USER’s GUIDE to Qualitative
Methods. (Second Edition). United States of America: Sage Publications.
Richards, T. (2002). An Intellectual History of NUD*IST and NVivo. Int. J. Soc.
Res. Methodology, 5(3): 199-214.
Richardson, JTE. (1998). Introduction. In J.T.E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of
Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Oxford,
UK: Blackwell Publishers. pp.3-10.
270
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, Schools, and
Academic Achievement (Working Paper W6691). Cambridge, MA: National
Bureau of Economic Research.
Rizvi, M. (2003). The Relationship between School Reforms and Teacher
Professionalism in Government school in Karachi, Pakistan. Ph.D Thesis. Qld,
Australia : QUT.
Rizvi, Meher and Elliot, Bob. (2007). Enhancing and Sustaining Teacher
Professionalism in Pakistan. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. Vol. 13,
No. 1, pp. 5-19.
Robbins, Joel. (2007). Between Reproduction and Freedom: Morality, Value, and
Radical Cultural Change. Ethnos 72(3):293-314.
Roberts, B.W., Walton, K.E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of Mean-level
Change in Personality Traits across the Life Course: A Meta-analysis of
Longitudinal Studies. Psychological Bulletin,132,1–25.
Robertson, J. (2005). Coaching Leadership. Wellington: NZCER Press.
Robinson, C. and Sebba, J. (2004). A Review of Research and Evaluation to Inform
the Development of the New Postgraduate Professional Development Programme.
TTA / University of Sussex.
Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and
Practitioners-Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Robson, J. (2006). Teacher Professionalism in Further and Higher Education:
Challenges to Culture and Practices. London: Routledge.
Rogan, J. (2004). Professional Development: Implications for Developing Countries.
In K. O-saki, K. Hosea & W. Ottevanger, Reforming Science and Mathematics
Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Obstacles and Opportunities (pp.155-170).
Amsterdam: Vrije Universteit Amsterdam.
Rogan, J. & Grayson, D. (2003). Towards a Theory of Curriculum Implementation
with Particular Reference to Science Education in Developing Countries.
International Journal of Science Education, 25 (10), 1171-1204.
Rohman, Arif. (2002). Akar Ideologis Problem Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia.
Fondasia. Vol. (2) No. 2.
271
Rose, H. (1991). Chapter 16: Case Studies. In Allan, G. & Skinner, C. (Eds.).
Handbook for Research Students in the Social Sciences. London: Falmer Press,
pp.190-202.
Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of Collaborative
Action Research on the Knowledge of Five Canadian Teacher-Researchers'.
Elementary School Journal, 99, 255-275.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What Large-scale Survey Research
Tells Us about Teacher Effects on Student Achievement: Insights from the
Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. Teachers College Record, 104,1525-1567.
Rowden, Rick. (2011). Impacts of IMF Policies on National Education Budgets and
Teachers: Exploring Possible Alternatives and Strategies for Advocacy. Education
International Research Institute. June.
Rout, M. (2007). Teacher Advised to Obtain Masters. The Australian, P. 25.
Sachs, J. (2003). The Activist Teaching Profession. Buckinham : Open University
Press.
Saluling, Detty M. 2009. Basic Education for Poverty Alleviation: Community
Perspectives from South Sulawesi, Indonesia. New Zealand. Victoria University of
Wellington.
Samani, Muchlas et al. (2003). Pembinaan Profesi Guru. Jakarta : Depdiknas
Sanborn, Mark. (2008). The Fred Factors: Teacher’s Guide. CO: Sanborn &
Associate.
Sandelowski, M, Voils, C.I, and Knafl, G. (2009). On Quantitizing. Journal of Mixed
Method Research Online. Retrieved online from doi:10.1177/1558689809334210.
http//jmmr.sagepub.com.
Sanders, Gail. (1992). “Continuing Professional Development Q & A, The Valuer
and Land Economist”.
Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment
System (TVAAS): Mixed-model Methodology in Educational Assessment. Journal
of Personnel Evaluation in Education,8, 299-311.
272
Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Research Project Report: Cumulative and
Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement.
Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment
Center. Re-trieved from http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ensure/tva/tva_2.html.
Sandra, S.A., Andriani, Durri, Antoro, Sunu Dwi, Prayekti, and Warsito. (2011).
Teaching and Learning Classroom Action Research at a Distance in an Indonesian
Urban Community. Indonesia Open University. Excellence in Higher Education 2
(2011): 114-120
Savage, W. (2000) A Dimension of Teacher (and learner) Autonomy. Paper presented
at 2000 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Language Centre
Conference.
Saxe, G., Gearhart, M., & Nasir, N. S. (2001). Enhancing Students’ Understanding of
Mathematics: A Study of Three Contrasting Approaches to Professional Support.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 55-79.
Schacter, M. (2000). Sub Saharan Africa: Lessons from Experience in Supporting
Sound Governance. In Kusek, J. Z., and Rist, R.C. (2004). Ten Steps to a Result
Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for Development
Practitioners. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Schleicher, A. (Ed). (2012), Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for
the 21st Century: Lessons from Around the World, OECD Publishing.
Schooling, M., Toth, M. & Marzano, R.J. (2010). Creating an Aligned System to
Develop Great Teachers within the Federal Race to the Top Initiative.
[Whitepaper]
Scott, Meagan, Swortzel, Kirk A., Taylor, Walter N. (2005). The Relationship
between Selected Demography Factors and the Level of Job Satisfaction of
Extension Agents. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 55(1),
102-115.
Seale, C. and Silverman, D. (1997). Ensuring Rigour in Qualitative Research.
European Journal of Public Health. 7(4). 379-384.
Segiovanni, T.J. (1999). Refocusing Leadership to Build Community. The High
School Magazine, September 1999, 12-15.
273
Sekretariat Negara RI, UU No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Jakarta.
Sekretariat Negara RI, UU No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A.
(2000). Orientation. In P. Senge, N. Cambron-McCabe, T. Lucas, B. Smith, J.
Dutton, and A. Kleiner (Eds.) Schools that Learn (pp. 3-58). New York:
Doubleday.
Senge, P. & Lannon-Kim, C. (1991). Recapturing the Spirit of Learning through a
Systems Approach. School Administrator, 48(9), 8-13.
Seyfarth, J.T. (2002). Human Resources; Management for Effective Schools.
Boston:Allyn and Bacon. Third Edition.
Shaeffer, S. 1990. Educational Change in Indonesia: A Case Study of Three
Innovations. Ottawa, International Development Research Centre.
Shapiro, Susan K. and Laine, Sabrina WM. (2005). Adding the Critical Voice: A
Dialogue with Practicing Teacher on Teacher Recruitment and Retention in Hard-
to-Staff Schools. Evaluation and Policy Research Group. Naperville, IL.
Showers, B., B. Joyce and B. Bennett. (1987). Synthesis of Research on Staff
Development: A Framework for Future Study and State of the Art Analysis.
Educational Leadership 45(3): 77-87.
Shulman, LS. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.
Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4-14.
Silver, R.B, Measelle, J.R, Armstrong, JM, Essex, MJ. (2005) Trajectories of
Classroom Externalizing behavior: Contribution of Child Characteristics, Family
Characteristics and the Teachers-Child Characteristics during the Transition.
Journal of School Psychology. (43). 39-60.
Siniscalco, M.T. and Auriat, N. (2005). Questionnaire Design. UNESCO:
International Institute for Educational Planning.
Sitterly, D. A. (1996). Conceptions of Professionalism among In-service and Pre-
service Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Company.
SMERU Research Institute. (2008b). Teacher Absenteeism and Remote Area
Allowance Baseline Survey. SMERU, Jakarta, Indonesia.
274
Smith, Christine and Gillespie, Marilyn. (2007). Research on Professional
Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education. P.205-
244. http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/smith-gillespie-07.pdf
Smith, R. (2007). Learning Management: Transitional Teachers for National and
International Changes. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
Smith, R.C. (2000) Starting with Ourselves: Teacher-learner Autonomy in Language
Learning. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner Autonomy,
Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. London: Longman. 89-99.
Snoek, M., A. Swennen, and M. van der Klink. 2009. The Teacher Educator: A
Neglected Factor in the Contemporary Debate on Teacher Education. In: B.
Hudson, ed. Proceedings of the TEPE 3rd Annual Conference Teacher Education
Policy in Europe: Quality in Teacher Education: 288-299. Umeå: Umeå
University.
Snoek, M. et al. 2009. Teacher Quality in Europe: Comparing Formal Descriptions.
Paper presented at the ATEE conference 2009, Mallorca, August 2009.
Sockett, H. (1993). The Moral Base for Teacher Professionalism. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Soder, R. (1990). The Rhetoric of Teacher Professionalization. In J.I. Goodlad, R.
Soder, & K.A. Sirotnik (Eds.). The Moral Dimension of Teaching (pp. 35-86). San
Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spirnthall, N. A., Reiman, A. J, & Thies-Spirnthall, L. (1996). Teacher Professional
Development. In T. B. J. Sikula, Handbook of Reserach on Teacher Education: A
Project of the Association of Teacher Educators (pp. 666-703). New York: Simon
& Schuster MacMillian.
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Steiner-Khamsi, Gita et al. (2009). Teacher Absenteeism and Accountability. USAID
Strategy Development.
275
Steiner-Khamsi,G., Harris-Van Keuren, C., Silova, I and Chachkhiani, K. (2009).
Decentralization and Recentralization Reforms: Their Impact on Teacher Salaries
in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Mongolia. Background paper for the EFA
Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO GMR.
Sternberg, R.J. (2006). Recognizing Neglected Strengths. Educational Leadership,
64(1), 30-35.
Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and
procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks. Sage.
Stronge, J. (2002). Qualities of Effective Teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Suciu, Andreia Irina and Mata, Liliana. (2011). Pedagogical Competence: The Key to
Efficient Education. International Online journal of Educational Sciences. Vol.
3(2), 411-423.
Sudarminta J. 2000. Tantangan dan Permasalahan Pendidikan di Indonesia Memasuki
Millenium ketiga dalam A. Atmadi dan Y. Setiyaningsih (editor) Transformasi
Pendidikan: Memasuki Milenium ketiga. Yogyakarta:Kanisius. Cetakan 1. Hal.3.
Suffean Husin. (2008). Pendidikan di Malaysia: Sejarah, Sistem, dan Falsafah. Edisi
2. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Sugiono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Supardi, U.S. (n.d). Arah Pendidikan di Indonesia dalam Tataran Kebijakan dan
Implementasi. Jurnal Formatif, 2(2), 111-121, ISSN: 2088-351X.
Suparlan. (2004). Mencerdaskan Kehidupan Bangsa, Mulai Dari Konsepsi Sampai
Dengan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Hikayat
Suparlan. (2005). Menjadi Guru Efektif. Yogyakarta: Hikayat.
Supovitz, J. (2001). Translating Teaching Practice into Improved Student
Achievement. In S. Fuhrman (ed.), From the Capitol to the classroom. Standards-
based Reforms in the States. The 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the
Study of Education, Part Two (pp. 81–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
276
Supriadi, D. (1998). Mengangkat Citra dan Martabat Guru. Yogyakarta: Adicita
Karya Nusa.
Sutanto (2013). Kebijakan dan Program Pendidikan Menengah Tahun 2013. Jakarta.
Swann, M., D. McIntyre, T. Pell, L. Hargreaves, and M. Cunningham. (2010).
Teachers’ Conceptions of Teacher Professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006.
British Educational Research Journal 36, no. 4: 549–71.
Taber, Keith S. (2011). Constructivism as Educational Theory: Contingency in
Learning, and Optimally Guided Instruction. New York: Nova Science Publisher.
Targeted News service. Washington D.C.: April 27, 2012. Teachers’ Matter.
http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.psz.utm.my/pqdweb?did=2645855511&sid=1&F
mt=3&clientId=21690&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social
& Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tate, M. L. (2009). Workshops: Extend Learning beyond your Presentation with
these Brain- friendly Strategies. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 44-46.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A
Guidebook and Resource (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Tecle, T. (2006). The Potential of Professional Development Scenario for Supporting
Biology Teachers in Eritrea. Enschede: Print Partiners IPS Kamp.
Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research:
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral
Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thavenius, C. (1999). Teacher Autonomy for Learner Autonomy. In Language
Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change. S. Cotteral and D. Crabbe
(eds.), 159-163. Frankfurt: Lang.
Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in
Theses and Dissertations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Tichenor, M., & Tichenor, J. (2005). Understanding Teachers’ Perspectives on
Professionalism. The Professional Educator, 27, 89-95.
277
Tichenor, Mercedes and Tichenor, John. (2009). Comparing Teacher and
Administrator Perspective on Multiple Dimensions of Teacher Professionalism.
SRATE Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 9-18.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A. Barrar, H. and Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional
Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration Wellington, New
Zealand: Ministry of Education http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/goto/BES.
Tinio, Victoria L. (2003). ICT in Education. New York: UNDP-APDIP.
Tittle, C.K. (2006). Assessment of Teacher Learning and Development. In P. A.
Alexander & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed.),
(pp. 953-980). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Toh, K.-A., Ho, B.-T., Riley, J. P., & Hoh, Y.-K. (2006). Meeting the Highly
Qualified Teachers Challenge. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 5,
187–194.
Tom, A. R. (1984). Teaching as a Moral Craft. New York: Longman.
Tort-Moloney, D. (1997) Teacher Autonomy: A Vygotskian Theoretical Framework.
CLCS Occasional Paper No. 48. Dublin: Trinity College, CLCS.
Towsend, T and Bates, Richard (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Teacher Education:
Globaization, Standards, and Professionalism in Time of Change. Netherlands:
Springer.
Troen, Vivian and Boles, Katherine C. (2012). The Power of Teachers Teams: With
Cases, Analyses, and Strategies for Success. Corwin: USA.
Tuovinen, Juhani E. (2008). Teacher Professionalism: Viewpoints on Best Practice,
the Case og Finland. AARE 2008 Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
UNATU. (2010). Why Government Must Hire More Teachers and Increase Their
Pay,” UNATU Newsletter: The Voice of the Teachers, Uganda National Teachers’
Union, Kampala, August.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Jakarta: Indonesia.
UNDESA. (2009). Rethinking Poverty: Report on the World Social Situation,
2010”United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. See
especially Chapter 5 for a thorough Critical of IMF Macroeconomic Policy.
278
UNDESA, (2010). Analyzing and Measuring Social Inclusion in a Global Context.
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. UN: New York.
UNDP. (2011). Asia-Pacific Human Development Report. London : Routledge.
UNESCO, (2014). Teaching and Learning: Achieving Quality for all. The United
Nation Education. Paris: France.
UNESCO. (2010). Education for Sustainable Development for Changing the Climate
of Teacher Education to Address Sustainability. Jakarta : Indonesia.
UNESCO. (2006). Teachers and Educational Quality: Monitoring Global Needs for
2015. Institute for Statistics. Montreal: Canada.
USAID. (2005). Teacher Network (MGMP) in Secondary Education in Indonesia.
Jakarta.
Van den Akker, J. & Thijs, A. (2002). Curriculum Reform and Teacher Professional
Development. In K. Osaki (Ed.), Science Education Research and Teacher
Professional Development in Tanzania (pp.23-38). Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam.
Verloop, N. (2001). Guest Editors Introduction, International Journal of Educational
Research 35, 435–440.
Victoria Education Department and Training. (2005). Professional Learning in
Effective School: The Seven Principles of Highly Effective Professional Learning.
Melbourn: Victoria.
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher Professional Development: An International
Review of the Literature. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
VSO. (2002). What Makes Teachers Tick? A Policy Research Report on Teacher’s
Motivation in Developing Countries. London.
Vygotsky, L. (1935/1978). Interaction between Learning and Development. In
L.Vygotsky, Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagner AD (2001) IT and Education for the Poorest of the Poor: Constraints,
Possibilities, and Principles. Tech-KnowLogia, July/August, 48-50.
279
Wahab, Rochmat. (2004). Arah Kebijakan Dan Strategi Pendidikan Dasar,
Menengah, Dan Tinggi Di Indonesia. Membangun Generasi Cerdas, Generasi
Peduli Bangsa, pada tanggal 25 Juli 2004 di Balai Besar Diklat Kesejahteraan
Sosial, Yogyakarta.
Waks, Leonard J. (2007) The Concept of Fundamental Educational Change.
Educational Theory. Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 227-295.
Waldron, Nancy L. and McLeskey, James. (2010). Establishing a Collaborative
School Culture Through Comprehensive School Reform. Journal of Educational
and Psychological Consultation, 20:58–74.
Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, Perceptions, and
Aspirations Concerning Teaching as a Career for Different Types of Beginning
Teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–428.
Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher Characteristics and Student
Achievement Gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89-122.
Webb, Rosemary et al. (2004). A Comparative Analysis of Primary Teachers
Professionalism in England and Finland. Comparative Education. Vol. 40, No. 1.
Pp. 83-107.
Weeks, K.M. (1996). Collegiality and the Quarrelsome Professor. Lex Collegii, 20,
No. 1, College Legal Information. Nashville: Tennese.
Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional Development
in the United States: Trends and challenges. (Executive Summary). Retrieved from
the National Staff Development Council website http://www.nsdc.org/news/
NSDCstudytechnicalreport2010.pdf
Wen, Sayling. 2003. Future of Education (Masa Depan Pendidikan), alih bahasa
Arvin Saputra, Batam: Lucky Publisher.
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How Schools Matter: The Link between Teacher Classroom
Practices and Student Academic Performance. Education Policy Analysis
Archives, 10(12). Retrieved from epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12.
Westendorf, S., Stewart, J. H., Baker, R. E., Cochran, M., Grady, C. D., Griffin, J.
W., Harrold, L. A., et al. (n.d.). Standards for Ohio Educators State Board of
Education.
280
Whitty, G. (2006). Teacher Professionalism in a New Era. A Paper Presented at the
First General Teaching Council for northern Ireland Annual Lecturer. Belfast,
March, 2006.
Whitty, G. (2008). Changing Modes of Teacher Professionalism: Traditional,
Managerial, Collaborative and Democratic. In B. Cunningham (Ed.), Exploring
Professionalism (pp.28-49). London: Bedford Way Press.
WHO Gender and Health : Technical Paper 1998 http://www.who.int/reproductive
health/publications/WHO 98 16 Gender and Health Technical Paper/WHO 98 16.
Introduction.en.html.
Wiley, D. and Yoon., B. (1995). Teacher Reports on Opportunity to Learn: Analyses
of the 1993 California Learning Assessment System. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis, 17: 355-370.
William, R. P., Barry, J. F., Ryoko, Y., & Lawrence, P. G. (2007). What Makes
Professional Development Effective? Strategies that Foster Curriculum
Implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921.
Williamson McDiarmid, G. & Clevenger-Bright, M. (2008). Rethinking Teacher
Capacity. In Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S. & Mc Intyre, D. (Eds).
Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing
Contexts. New York/Abingdon: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Willms, J.D. (2000). Standards of Care: Investments to Improve Children’s
Educational Outcomes in Latin America. Paper presented at the “year 2000
Conference of Early Childhood Development” Sponsored by the World Bank,
Washington, D.C., April, 2000.
Wilms, W. W. and Zell, D. M. (2002) “Evaluation of a Union-Led Lesson Study
Project in the Language Arts: Final Report.” Los Angeles, March 2002.
Wils, A. and R. O’Connor. (2004). Teachers matter: Teachers Supply as a Constraint
on the Global Education Transition. WP-04-01. Washington, D.C.: EPDC.
Wilson, S. (Ed). (2009). Teacher Quality (Education Policy White Paper).
Washington, DC: National Academy of Education. Retrieved from.
http://www.naeducation.org/Teacher_Quality_White_Paper.pdf.
281
Wilson, B. L., & Corbett, H. D. (2001). Listening to Urban Kids: School Reform and
the Teachers They Want. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wong, H. K., and Wong, R. T. (1998). The First Days Of School: How to be an
Effective Teacher. Mountain view, Calif.: Harry K. Wong Publications.
Wood, Diane R. (2007). Professional Learning Communities: Teachers, Knowledge,
and Knowing. Theory into Practice. Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 281-290.
Woods, P. (2006). Successful Writing for Qualitative Research. (Second Edition).
London: Routledge.
Woolley, Claire M. (2009). Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a
Sociological Study of Structure and Agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
Vol. 3, No.1 January 2009 7-25 © 2009 Sage Publications
10.1177/1558689808325774 http://jmmr.sagepub.com.
World Bank. (2010b). Egypt: Teachers. Washington, DC, World Bank. (SABER
Country Report.)
World Bank. (2010). Transforming Indonesia’s Teaching Forces. Human
Development East Asia and Pacific Region Report No. 53732-ID, Vol. 1. World
Bank Office, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teachers and Classroom Context
Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of
Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.
Yin, R. K., 2003. Case Study Research Design and Methods. London: Sage
Publication.
Zeichner, K. M., & Conklin, H. G. (2005). Teacher Education Programs. In M.
Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying Teacher Education: The Report
of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 645-736). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zeichner, Ken. (2009). Teacher Professionalism in USA. Madison : University of
Wisconsin.
Zimmerman, Barry J. (2002). Becoming a Self-regulated Learner: An Overview.
Ohio: Ohio State University.
282
Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Reflections on Theories of Self-regulated
Learning and Academic Achievement. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (Eds.),
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives
(2nd Ed.) (pp. 289-307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zulkifli Abd. Hamid et al. (2011). Hubungan Aِِntara Penglibatan Ibu Bapa dan
Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Miskin di Negeri Selangor. Journal of Islamic and
Arabic Education 3(2), 2011 31-40.