teacher tube revised rubric

2
# 3 14/20 Teacher Tube 1 pt. Poor 2 pts. Fair 3 pts. Good 4 pts. Excellent Relativity to Curriculum Content Poor No relationship with curriculum content exists. Website does not state academic levels and contains few videos for target audience. No clear use of the videos in regular classroom activities. Fair Limited relationship with curriculum content. Website has suitable for limited videos . Few videos can be used in the classroom setting and there are little to no additional activities for whole class, individual or group. Good Good relationship with curriculum content. The website randomly states the academic level of target audience and videos are mostly suited for audience. Videos can be integrated in classroom activities and there are suggested uses for whole class, individual and group lessons. Excellent Direct relationship with curriculum content. Clearly states the academic level of target audience and contains content and videos relevant to the audience. Videos can be used in classroom and the website includes additional activities for whole class, individual and group lessons. Ease of Use by Instructors Poor Graphics/links are not labeled or don't offer rollover labeling, fonts are difficult to read. Some links do not take the reader to the videos described. A user typically feels lost. Fair Graphics/links are seldom labeled or seldom offer rollover labeling; fonts are sometimes used for ease of reading. Links for navigation take the reader where s/he expects to go, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user sometimes gets lost. Good Graphics/links are mostly labeled or have rollover labeling; fonts are mostly easy to read. Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from a video to related videos (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost Excellent Graphics/links are labeled or have rollover labeling; fonts are consistently easy to read. Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a video to related videos (forward and back), and take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user does not become lost. Effectiveness in teaching Poor Videos are ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment. Fair Videos are partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students. Good Videos are mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeal to students. Excellent Videos are effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning. Design, Aesthetic appeal, and Navigation Accessibility Poor The site is not visually appealing to target audience. No balance between graphics and text. Home page does not contain links to other parts of the website. Difficult to access the videos and logins are required to view and Fair The site is mildly appealing. There is a lack of balance between text and graphics. The home page contains some links to other parts of the website and only a few are active and current. The web site can be accessed with effort, (time consuming) and logins are required to view some content Good The site is appealing to audience. There is a slight balance between graphics and text. Home page contains direct links to other parts of the web site but links are not all current or active. The web site can be accessed with some effort and logins are not required to view content, but to Excellent The site is visually appealing to target audience and contains a good balance between graphics and text. Home page contains direct links to other parts of the web site, links are current and active. The web site is easily accessible and no login is required to view and download /share

Upload: sgarrett333

Post on 22-Jul-2015

241 views

Category:

Education


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Teacher Tube Revised Rubric

# 314/20

TeacherTube

1 pt.Poor

2 pts.Fair

3 pts.Good

4 pts.Excellent

Relativity to Curriculum Content

Poor No relationship with curriculum content exists. Website does not state academic levels and contains few videos for target audience. No clear use of the videos in regular classroom activities.

Fair Limited relationship with curriculum content. Website has suitable for limited videos . Few videos can be used in the classroom setting and there are little to no additional activities for whole class, individual or group.

Good Good relationship with curriculum content. The website randomly states the academic level of target audience and videos are mostly suited for audience. Videos can be integrated in classroom activities and there are suggested uses for whole class, individual and group lessons.

Excellent Direct relationship with curriculum content. Clearly states the academic level of target audience and contains content and videos relevant to the audience. Videos can be used in classroom and the website includes additional activities for whole class, individual and group lessons.

Ease of Use by Instructors

Poor Graphics/links are not labeled or don't offer rollover labeling, fonts are difficult to read. Some links do not take the reader to the videos described. A user typically feels lost.

Fair Graphics/links are seldom labeled or seldom offer rollover labeling; fonts are sometimes used for ease of reading. Links for navigation take the reader where s/he expects to go, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user sometimes gets lost.

Good Graphics/links are mostly labeled or have rollover labeling; fonts are mostly easy to read. Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from a video to related videos (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost

Excellent Graphics/links are labeled or have rollover labeling; fonts are consistently easy to read. Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a video to related videos (forward and back), and take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user does not become lost.

Effectiveness in teaching

Poor Videos are ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment.

Fair Videos are partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students.

Good Videos are mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeal to students.

Excellent Videos are effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning.

Design,Aesthetic appeal, andNavigationAccessibility

Poor The site is not visually appealing to target audience.

No balance between graphics and text. Home page does not contain links to other parts of the website. Difficult to access the videos and logins are required to view and

Fair The site is mildly appealing. There is a lack of balance between text and graphics. The home page contains some links to other parts of the website and only a few are active and current. The web site can be accessed with effort, (time consuming) and logins are required to view some content

Good The site is appealing to audience. There is a slight balance between graphics and text.Home page contains direct links to other parts of the web site but links are not all current or active.The web site can be accessed with some effort and logins are not required to view content, but to

Excellent The site is visually appealing to target audience and contains a good balance between graphics and text. Home page contains direct links to other parts of the web site, links are current and active. The web site is easily accessible and no login is required to view and download/share

Page 2: Teacher Tube Revised Rubric