teaching 3d geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

24
Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment(DGE): Rethinking the role of didactical performance in teacher’s orchestration Shao Mingyu, ENS de Lyon and ECNU Shanghai The didactical challenge of Dynamic Geometry Environment ENS de Lyon, 7th November 2019 1

Upload: others

Post on 16-Jun-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Teaching3Dgeometryinadynamicgeometricenvironment(DGE):Rethinkingtheroleofdidacticalperformanceinteacher’sorchestrationShaoMingyu,ENSdeLyonandECNUShanghai

ThedidacticalchallengeofDynamicGeometryEnvironmentENSdeLyon,7thNovember2019

1

Page 2: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

2

Researchproblemandbackground Students'thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsTeacher’schallenges

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects—anoverview 3Dgeometricobjects;InternalandexternalGraphicalrepresentationsStudents'thinkingprocessesintheFrenchandChinesetasks

Discussion

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktoanalyzeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

Whatshouldbetherolesplayedbytheteacher

Relevanceofadditionaltheoreticalframeworks?

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediationSemioticpotentialofartifacts;Interventionofteacherasamediator

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

Page 3: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

3

ProblematicofmythesisBackground

HowateacherintegratesDGEinclasstofacilitatestudents’thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsin3Dgeometry?‒  Moreprecisely,whatcanwelearnfromdeepeningdidacticalperformanceininstrumental

orchestrationframework

Student’sthinkingwithgraphicalrepresentations

•  Importancebutdifficultytointerpretgraphicalrepresentations;

•  Increasedinterestofintuitionin3DGeometry(Chinesecurriculum,2017;CREM,2004)

Teacher’schallengesinDGE,inspiteofitsadvantages

•  Resourcepreparation

•  Artifacts/resourcesorganizing

(Ruthven,2009;Drijvers,2010)

Page 4: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

4

Researchproblemandbackground Students'thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsTeacher’schallenges

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects—anoverview 3Dgeometricobjects;InternalandexternalGraphicalrepresentationsStudents'thinkingprocessesintheFrenchandChinesetasks

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

Discussion

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktoanalyzeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

Whatshouldbetherolesplayedbytheteacher

Relevanceofadditionaltheoreticalframeworks?

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediationSemioticpotentialofartifacts;Interventionofteacherasamediator

Page 5: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

3DGeometricobject:afiguralconceptwithadoublenature(Fischbein,1993;Mithalal&

Balacheff,2019)

•  Atheoreticalreferentdefinedbytheconjunctionofgeometricalproperties

•  asetofrepresentations,eithergraphical,textualorsymbolic

Internal(mental)graphicalrepresentation

•  Mentalimage:amentalrepresentationoftheobjectwhenitisnotpresent(Marchand,2006)

•  Conceptimage:acognitiveconstructionthatcrystalizesallthepropertiesofthegeometrical

objectintooneimage,completelycontrolledbyadefinition(Accascina&Rogora,2006)

5

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects

Page 6: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects

External(concrete)graphicalrepresentation

6

01

HOME

RealisticModels Drawings DigitalModels/Diagrams

•  Intuitivesupporttowardsinternalimages

•  Easytoconstruct/deconstruct?

•  Transformable(rotate,translate…)

+++Veryclosetotheobjectrepresented;Noninfinity;

+++

+Constraintofmaterials;Somecanbecut,butnoteasytorecover;

+Lossofinformation;Perceptualobviation;Noninfinity

+++NoConstraintofmaterials;Easytoeraseorrecover;Principlesofparallelprojection;+

++Dragging,changingpointofview;Verycomplexconfigurations;Noninfinity;++NoConstraintofmaterials;Easytohide/redisplay/cutGeometricknowledgeneededforrobustconstruction++instrumentaltechniquesneeded

adheringtosomeconventions;Prototypeeffect;unnecessarylinks;

Drawingsintextbook/curricula

(Accascina&Rogora,2006;Fujita,2012;Bridoux&Nihoul,2015;Parsysz,1988;)

Page 7: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects

7

Students’thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentations

Twoabilitiesinvisualization(Bishop,1983):

•  visualprocessing:emerging,transformation,manipulationandextrapolationofvisualimages;

•  interpretationoffiguralinformation:‘reading’and‘interpreting’ofvisualimages,eithermentalor

external,togetfromthemanyrelevantinformationStudents’interpretationofdrawingsof3Dobjects(Bridoux&Nihoul2015):

possiblyinfluencedbyperceptualintuition,conventionsintextbooks,discoursessituatingthe

representations,andthetheoretic-deductivereasoningprocess

Page 8: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects

ConceptImage Mental

Images

Otherinformationincludingrelationship/properties.

initiate

Addconstructions

Externalgraphical

representations

RealisticModels

Digitalmodels

FrenchtaskConstructtheintersectionofline(EF)andplane(ABC)onthedigitalmodelsinGeoGebra

Wheredigitalmodelscanfacilitate:Conflictingperceptualeffectfromvaryingviewpoints—stimulatedeductive-theoreticreasoninginordertobetterunderstandthephenomenononthescreen

theoretic-deductivereasoning/conjecturebasedonperception

8

Analysisaprioriofstudents’thinkingintheFrenchtask

Definitionofgeometricobject

Control

Interpretation Visualprocessing

Page 9: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Analysisaprioriofstudents’thinkingintheChinesetask

MentalImages

Otherinformationincludingrelationship/properties.

mentalrotation

initiate

OtherMentalImages

Drawings

Digitalmodels

ChinesetaskAplaneαcuttingthoughacubeisatthesameangletoalltheedgesofthecube,thenwhatisthemaximumareaofthesectionsofthecube?

conjecturebasedonperception

Wheredigitalmodelscanfacilitate:Renderingvisiblethecomplexstructure:cube’srotationsandmanypossiblesections–mentalimagessupportingproductionofdrawings;intuitivesupportforconjectureA 3√�3 /4  B 2√�3 /3  c 3√�2 /4  D √�3 /2 

9

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects

cuttingsections

ConceptImage

Definitionofgeometricobject

Control

Externalgraphical

representations

theoretic-deductivereasoning

Interpretation Visualprocessing

Page 10: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

10

Researchproblemandbackground Students'thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsTeacher’schallenges

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects—anoverview 3Dgeometricobjects;InternalandexternalGraphicalrepresentationsStudents'thinkingprocessesintheFrenchandChinesetasks

Discussion

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktoanalyzeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

Whatshouldbetherolesplayedbytheteacher

Relevanceofadditionaltheoreticalframeworks?

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediationSemioticpotentialofartifacts;Interventionofteacherasamediator

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

Page 11: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Differentepistemologicalvalidationof(perceptual)argumentation,theoretic-deductivereasoningandmathematicalproof(Balacheff,2019).Frompersonalconvictiontowardscollectiveconviction

Teacher’sworkorchallenges:•  Avoidperceptualdeviation,promote“mathematical

conjectures”basedonempiricalevidences;•  Avoidstudentsfromenteringintocomplicated

deductivereasoningunlessnecessary.

Teacher’sworkorchallenges:•  highlighttheconflictingperceptualeffects,

provoketheintellectualneedforproof(Linetal,2012)

•  HelpstudentsmastertheinstrumentaltechniqueswithDGE,withmathmeaningattached

Intuitionsfromdifferentviewpointscauseconfusion

Intuitionsuggeststherightconclusion,theoretic-deductivereasoningonlyneededforstudyingthepropertiesofacertainsection

Frenchcase

Chinesecase

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

11

Page 12: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

12

Researchproblemandbackground Students'thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsTeacher’schallenges

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects—anoverview 3Dgeometricobjects;InternalandexternalGraphicalrepresentationsStudents'thinkingprocessesintheFrenchandChinesetasks

Discussion

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktoanalyzeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

Whatshouldbetherolesplayedbytheteacher

Relevanceofadditionaltheoreticalframeworks?

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediationSemioticpotentialofartifacts;Interventionofteacherasamediator

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

Page 13: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktodescribeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

connectmathematicalmeaningtotheartifactsigns

(digitalones);Theoryofsemiotic

mediation(Mariotti,2009)

orchestratesmultiplevoices’toimprovethestudents’

formulations;Toulmin’sdiagramofargumentation(2003)

Usingthemousetohighlightpartsofthescreenduringher

oralexplanations;Multimedia-based

instructionaldesign(Mayer,2009)

DidacticalconfigurationExploitationmode(Trouche,2004)Frenchcase:technical-guide-and-explainChinesecase:explain-screen-board

Didacticalperformance(Drijvers,2010)—Ageneralrecordingofhowtheteachingactuallytakesplace,havingcoveredmanyaspects,noparticularfocus,notstructuredenoughtocaptureteachingprinciples

1 2 3

13

anaspecttobedevelopedanddeepened

Page 14: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

14

Researchproblemandbackground Students'thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsTeacher’schallenges

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects—anoverview 3Dgeometricobjects;InternalandexternalGraphicalrepresentationsStudents'thinkingprocessesintheFrenchandChinesetasks

Discussion

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktoanalyzeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

Whatshouldbetherolesplayedbytheteacher

Relevanceofadditionaltheoreticalframeworks?

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediationSemioticpotentialofartifacts;Interventionofteacherasamediator

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

Page 15: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Semioticpotentialofanartifact:Signs,personalproductionoftheirmeaningintheuseofartifactforsolvingtasks;

French case Chinese case

Artifactsigns—mathematicalmeaning

—alineasgeometricobjectdefinedbytwopoints

—intersectionoftwosetsofpoints

—thecorrespondinggeometricobject

+teachers’gesturesoftranslatingthepenalongadirection

—symmetrypropertyofthecubewithrespecttoitsdiagonal.

—interactionbetweenthepropertiesofaplaneandacube

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediation

—theideaofalinebeinginfiniteandcuttingintoaplane

Artifactsigns—mathematicalmeaning

—projectionofa3Dconfigurationontothe2Denvironment

Relativemathematicalmeanings,theeducationalgoal

15

+

Page 16: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

‒  Mathematicaltermsgivenatverybeginning;JOSE4:Toutd’abord,j’aiécritautableau…«positionsdedeuxdroites:soitellessontsécantes,soitellessontparallèles».‒  Reaffirmthetask;JOSE13: Exercice1,tracerlepointd'intersectionde(EF)avec(ABC)commeça(Fig.1).‒  Provideasynthesis,mentalprolongationinitiatedbypaper-

pencilartifact;theoretic-deductivereasoningJOSE13: •  J’aimontréunefeuillepourfaireleplan(ABC),etladroite(EF)

représentéeparunstylo,sijeprolongeladroiteetleplan,çavasecouperenunpoint....

•  C’estquesiladroiten’estpasparallèleauplan,niconfondue,alorsladroitevacouperleplan.

Interventionoftheteacherasamediator

Fig.1

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediation—French

16

JOSE4,13:excerptsfrominterview,sameforthefollowing

Page 17: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

‒  Contextualizationandspecialization;JOSE13:pourtrouverlepointd’intersectionduplanavecladroite,•  premièreidée,prolonger[EF]•  Deuxièmeidée,prolonge[AB]et[EF],cesdeuxdroitesvontse

couperenunpoint…l’intersectionde(EF)avec(ABC).JOSE14:•  Aveclebouton,ilsontconstruitladroiteparEetF,et

(BA).•  Aveclebouton,ilsontconstruitl’intersectionde(EF)avec

(AB).‒  Fromacommonexperiencetowardsdivergentpersonal

trajectoriesJOSE18:«cequiontréussiàlefairepeuventpasseràl’exercicesuivant». Fig.1

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediation—Chinese

17

Interventionoftheteacherasamediator

Page 18: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

‒  FromthecommonexperiencewiththeGeoGebra,focusonperceptualeffectsconsistentwithcube’sgeometricproperty,withhiswords,gesturesandinductiveprinciples

Interventionoftheteacherasamediator:

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediation—Chinese

Fig.2

Fig.3 18

HE10:•  rotatethecubearoundthediagonal(Figure2)…thisedge

willberotatedtothatedge,thesamefortheotheredges,•  i.e.,thepositionsoftheedgebeforeandaftertherotation

areequivalentHE11:•  Idragthisplanealongthediagonal…eithertheplanemoves

upwardordownward,thesection’sareawillbecomesmaller(Figure3)

•  thenthemaximumareamustexistsomewhereinthemiddle…itisenoughtoguessouttherightanswer.

Page 19: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

Interventionoftheteacherasamediator:

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediation—Chinese

‒  Provideasynthesis•  Inordertocalculatetheconcretemeasureofarea,the

teacherwillintroducetheoreticdeductivereasoningwiththecube’sproperties;

•  Detachthesectionfromthedigitalmodeltotheboard;‒  Personalproductionofpapersignsbasedonthe

mentalimagesinitiatedbydigitalmodels•  Studentsconstructdrawingsofcubeonthepaper,and

addtheirowndraftstofiguratethesections.

19

Page 20: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

20

Researchproblemandbackground Students'thinkingwithgraphicalrepresentationsTeacher’schallenges

Thinkingprocesseswithgraphicalrepresentationsof3Dobjects—anoverview 3Dgeometricobjects;InternalandexternalGraphicalrepresentationsStudents'thinkingprocessesintheFrenchandChinesetasks

Necessityofbalancingintuitionandtheoretic-deductivereasoninginDGE

Discussion

Instrumentalorchestration:aframeworktoanalyzeteacher’sperformanceinaDGEequippedclass

Whatshouldbetherolesplayedbytheteacher

Relevanceofadditionaltheoreticalframeworks?

AnalyzingthetwocaseswithTheoryofSemioticMediationSemioticpotentialofartifacts;Interventionofteacherasamediator

Page 21: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

21

whatcanwelearnfromthiscomparison

DidacticperformanceundertheperspectiveofTSMBothprovideasynthesisfromacommonexperiencewithGeoGebratothemathematicalmeaning.Differencesinthefollowingaspects

Instrumentalorchestration:Explain-screen-board:teacherisinthewholecontrolofGeoGebra

Discussion

Technical-guide-and-explain:students’actionswithGeoGebraaremoreatstake

Frenchcase Chinesecase

•  Atrajectoryofartifactsigns,mental/conceptimages,andmathematicalmeaning•  howintuition/theoretic-deductivereasoningarebalanced

Presenceofdigitalmodels—perceptualeffectsconsistenttothecube’sproperties—mathmeaning;mentalimageswithdigitalmodels--drawingsonthepaper

Improperintuitionwithdigitalmodels—mentalprolongationwithpaper-pencil—conceptimage—mathmeaning--digitalmodelsandinstrumentaltechniques

theoretic-deductivereasoning+paper-pencilartifact

intuitionbasedconjecture(inductiveprinciples+gestures,words);alittledeductivereasoning

Page 22: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

22

Perspectivesoffutureinvestigation

Potentialsoftheothertwoapproachesdeepeningthedidacticalperformance•  Toulmin’sdiagramofargumentation(2003)

Data,warrant,backing,qualifier-claimsemerginginstudents’argumentation,teacher’sroleinestablishingnormsinacommunitythatallowstovalidateanargumentation—somethingrelatedtodeductive-theoreticreasoning,orproof.

•  Multimedia-basedinstructionaldesign(Mayer,2009)Coordinateteacher’sgestures,oralexplanationstothemultimediainformationdisplayedtodirectstudents’attentioninasystematicandorderedway.

Takingintoconsiderationteacher’sresourcepreparation,togetherwiththeirknowledgeandorientations.

Page 23: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

23

Accascina,G.,&Rogora,E.(2006).UsingCabri3DDiagramsforTeachingGeometry.InternationalJournalforTechnologyinMathematicsEducation,13(1),11–22.

Balacheff,N.(2019).L’argumentationmathématique:précurseurproblématiquedeladémonstration.PresentationofCORFEM(33).Strasbourg.

Bishop,A.J.(1983).Spatialabilitiesandmathematicalthinking.InProceedingsofthefourthinternationalcongressonmathematicaleducation(pp.176–178).

Bridoux,S.,&Nihoul,C.(2015).Difficultésdesélèvesàinterpréterdesconstructionsdansl’espace.Uneétudedecas.Petitx,(98),53–76.

CREM:Ballieu,M.,&Guissard,M.-F.(2004).Pouruneculturemathématiqueaccessibleatous.Élaborationd’outilspédagogiquespourdevelopperdescompétencescitoyennes.Nivelle,Belgique.

Drijvers,P.,Doorman,M.,Boon,P.,Reed,H.,&Gravemeijer,K.(2010).Theteacherandthetool:Instrumentalorchestrationsinthetechnology-richmathematicsclassroom.EducationalStudiesinMathematics,75(2),213–234.

Fischbein,E.(1993).Thetheoryoffiguralconcepts.EducationalStudiesinMathematics,24(2),139–162.Fujita,T.(2012).Learners’levelofunderstandingoftheinclusionrelationsofquadrilateralsandprototypephenomenon.TheJournalofMathematicalBehavior,31(1),60–72.

Fujita,T.(2012).Learners’levelofunderstandingoftheinclusionrelationsofquadrilateralsandprototypephenomenon.TheJournalofMathematicalBehavior,31(1),60–72.

References

Page 24: Teaching 3D geometry in a dynamic geometric environment

24

Lin,F.-L.,Yang,K.-L.,Lee,K.-H.,Tabach,M.,&Stylianides,G.(2012).PrinciplesofTaskDesignforConjecturingandProving.InG.Hanna&M.deVilliers(Eds.),ProofandProvinginMathematicsEducation:The19thICMIStudy(pp.305–325).

Marchand,P.(2006).Commentdévelopperlesimagesmentalesreliéesàl’apprentissagedel’espaceentroisdimensions?AnnalesdeDidactiqueetdeSciencesCognitives,(11),103–121.

Mariotti,M.A.(2009).ArtifactsandsignsafteraVygotskianperspective:Theroleoftheteacher|SpringerLink.ZDMMathematicsEducation,(41),427–440.

Mayer,R.E.(2009).Multimedialearning,2nded.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.Mithalal,J.,&Balacheff,N.(2019).Theinstrumentaldeconstructionasalinkbetweendrawingandgeometrical

figure.EducationalStudiesinMathematics,100(2),161–176.Parzysz,B.(1988).“Knowing”vs“seeing”.Problemsoftheplanerepresentationofspacegeometryfigures.

EducationalStudiesinMathematics,19(1),79–92.Ruthven,K.(2009).TowardsaNaturalisticConceptualisationofTechnologyIntegrationinClassroomPractice:The

exampleofschoolmathematics.ÉducationetDidactique,3(vol3-n°1),131–159.Toulmin,S.E.(2003).TheUsesofArgument(2nded.).NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.Trouche,L.(2004).ManagingtheComplexityofHuman/MachineInteractionsinComputerizedLearning

Environments:GuidingStudents’CommandProcessthroughInstrumentalOrchestrations.InternationalJournalofComputersforMathematicalLearning,9(3),281.

References