teaching how to use the cfd approach by an example: hydrodynamics within a passenger car compartment...
DESCRIPTION
The CDF methodology is applied to the study of the air flow around a 2-D car and its interaction with the cabin internal air. The flow visualization or computational works enable engineers to calculate different car characteristics like drag coefficient, external and internal air flow patterns.The results show the physics behavior of the flow and the presence of flow structures, as for instance, indoor air recirculation zones.TRANSCRIPT
Teaching How to use the CFD Approach by an Example: Hydrodynamics within a Passenger Car Compartment in Motion
2009 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Meeting (FEDSM2009), Colorado, USA.
Geanette Polanco, Nelson García-Polanco, Luis Rojas-SolórzanoUniversidad Simón Bolívar, Venezuela
ISBN: 978-0-7918-4373-4 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3855-6
Copyright © 2009 by ASME
1
The targetTo teach in a effectible way Computational Fluid Dynamics
to student or engineers in a formation process
The aim of this work
To illustrate the CFD technique application using an example on the study of flow field of a passenger car compartment in motion
The aim of this work
2
The exampleThe example taken represents the motion of a car compartment,
with indoor air flow produced by the interaction between the cabin inner air with the external flow through two glass windows (one in the front seat and one in the back seat).
This configuration could represent a common situation for the passenger car compartment. The study covers two different car speeds, 50 and 100 km/h.
3
Governing equations and mathematical scheme
As a fluid mechanics problem the Navier-Stokes equations are using to represent the flow interaction with the car compartment, which is assumed completely solid without any deformation produced by the flow.
The k-ε turbulence was selected to reproduce the turbulence The k-ε turbulence was selected to reproduce the turbulence behavior
The mathematical scheme used corresponds to the finite volume method.
4
• Definition of the problem:
Physics considerations
Whole physics involved
A particular topic of the actual situation
Numerical accuracy
Spatial consideration
Two-dimensional approach (2D)
Modeling process steps - Summary
Two-dimensional approach (2D)
Full three-dimensional approach (3D)
• Computational model and domain construction
• Application of suitable boundary conditions
• Domain and mesh checking process
• Results
• Results analysis
• Conclusion remarks
5
The degree of success of the modeling is based on a good
definition of the objective and aimof the work, which will
define the rest of the steps for the modeling process!
The results to be obtained will obey directly to the definition
proposed
Modeling process steps - Summary
proposed
• The iterative process of checking strongly depends on the management
of the Fluids Mechanics knowledge
• Results, Analysis and conclusion also depend on the FluidsMechanics
knowledge of the research. The results not always are as 100 %
explicit or accurate as desired
6
• Simplified 2D version of a cabin, based on prismatic shapes.
Modeling process
•Two different air-cabin relative
velocities: 50 and 100 km/h
3W
L
W
2L
The domain size is described based on the cabin length, L, and wide, W, of the model which correspond to 2 m and 1. 3 m, respectively
7
Modeling process / Domain and mesh checking – Veloci ty flow field
For a distance 2L at the back of the car flow recirculation is presentedTherefore a larger distant behind the car is needed.This demonstrates the importance of the appropriate downstream length when complying the constant pressure-developed flow condition at outflows.
8
Modeling process / Changes in the domain
• As the result of flow field analyses a
new domain was established with
reduced lateral dimensions from
twice the wide of the car up to one
time the wide of the car and larger
area behind the car
9
Modeling process / Changes in the Mesh
• The mesh takes into account the walls and the internal
space of the cabin
• Mesh sensibility was also tested
10
Modeling process / Boundary Conditions
Constant
velocity profile
V=50 km/h
or
V=100 km/h
Constant ambient pressure
Constant
ambient
pressure
Constant ambient pressure
Constant pressure condition also implies that the velocity field is developed in the
perpendicular direction to the border, therefore, no recir culation can be presented.
If occurs, this means the condition can not be fulfilled and a change in the domain
must be done or in some cases the applicability of this kind of boundary must be
reassessed.11
Modeling process / Convergence
Convergence criteria:
Usually the criteria to stop a simulation are based on the residual values of each
variable calculated during the simulation.
It is possible to change the defaults values pre-established for each variable or even it
is possible to prioritize the residuals of some variables over others which can be
ignored, due to the physics involved in the problemignored, due to the physics involved in the problem
The residual is monitored in a graphical wayalong with a text file which contains all the information available to further analysis.
The typical defaults values are:10-3 for mass flow [kg/s]10-3 for velocities [m/s]10-2 for pressure [Pa]
12
Results/ Different formats
As part of the advantages of the CFD technique the results of a
simulation can be extracted under various formats, such as:
•Spatial vector flow profiles
•Contours profiles
•Profiles over a specific line
•Data file13
Results I / Velocity flow field at car speed of 50 km/h. Steady state
Velocity profile for the new domain tested.No recirculation is presented at the border. However, it is important to mention that uniform flow pattern is not achieved which suggests that a new length must be introduce to avoid any influence of the boundary condition on the results
14
Results II / Velocity flow field at car speed of 50 km/h – Zoom
Steady state
vortex
As expected, the vortex shedding phenomenon appeared breaking the symmetry of the flow field.
15
Results III / Velocity flow field at car speed of 5 0 km/h – Cabin.
Steady state
Flow field around the cabin does not show symmetry.These results have the same general trend of the simulation performed for transient conditions.
16
Results IV / Pressure field at car speed of 50 km/h . Steady state
The maximum pressure is located at front of the cabinas expected due to the stagnation condition. Theminimum pressure is located inside the cabin.
17
Results V / Velocity field at car speed of 50 km/h. Transient. Cabin
Internal flow recirculation and the interaction at the glass windows location between the external and internal flow is shown. The main direction of the flow is from the back window to the pilot window for both car speeds tested.
18
Results VI / Velocity field at car speed of 50 km/h . Transient
The pressure field corresponding to transient cases also keeps the same characteristics of the steady state case.The max and min pressure are located at the same points of the steady state simulation and the other speed car velocity tested.
19
Results VII / v - ε fields at car speed of 50 km/h. Transient
�No major differences are observed respect to the steady state condition.
� The zones with more energy dissipation are located on the outside part of the turbulent structure behind the cabin.
20
The use of CFD technique allows the student to apply the basic concepts
of fluid dynamics in the study and analysis of a new designs or
prototypes in any area of engineering. CFD is a computational tool and
therefore it can not overcome in any situation the understanding of the
physics involved in the problem studied by the user. The success of the
CFD application to a particular problem is based on the correct
Conclusions
CFD application to a particular problem is based on the correct
representation of the reality in every single phase of the modeling
process and the correct interpretations of the obtained results.
REFERENCE: Paper No. FEDSM2009-78014, pp. 251-257; 7pages doi:10.1115/FEDSM2009-78014
From:ASME 2009 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Volume 2: Fora, Vail, Colorado, USA, August 2–6, 2009
Conference Sponsors: Fluids Engineering Division, ISBN: 978-0-7918-4373-4 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3855-6
Copyright © 2009 by ASME
21