team 1 aerodyn1qdr

Upload: jack-zakaria

Post on 13-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    1/18

    Dane Batema Benoit Blier

    Drew Capps Patricia Roman

    Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra

    John Tapee Carlos Vergara

    Team 1:

    Aerodynamics 1 QDR

    Team Canard

    September 19th, 2006

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    2/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 2

    Overview

    Aircraft Geometry:

    - Airfoil selection for wing and tail

    - Wing and tail configuration

    - Aspect ratio and wetted area

    - 3-View drawing

    Aerodynamic Mathematical Model:

    - CL

    - CD

    - CLMax

    Summary

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    3/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 3

    Preliminary Airfoil Selection

    Wing Airfoil:- Looked at pylon racers

    - MH 43 common airfoil

    - Low Reynolds number airfoil

    Tail Airfoil:

    - NACA 0009 common in tail surfaces

    - Thin, lower induced and parasite drag

    MH 43

    NACA 0009

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    4/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 4

    Wing Geometry

    METHOD Fixed thanks to historical data:

    Aspect ratio = 10

    Taper ratio = 0.45

    To be determined:

    Sweep angle

    Dihedral angle

    Wing span

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    5/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 5

    Wing Geometry

    C

    ab

    s

    Swing= 4.16 ft2

    22

    bac

    Swing

    45.0a

    b

    10

    4 2

    wingS

    c

    f ta 89.0

    f tb 4.0

    f tc 225.3

    Wing span = 6.45 ft

    Wing span = 6 ft Aspect ratio = 8.65

    Sweep angle = )(tan 1

    c

    ba

    = 9.3 degrees

    Too much for structure

    Top View

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    6/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 6

    Wing Geometry

    dtroot

    ttip

    Dihedral angle= )(tan 1

    c

    tt tiproot =0.73 degrees

    Chordtip= 0.4 Chordroot

    ttip= 0.4 trootSame airfoil all along the wing

    0846.0c

    t

    troot= 0.0846 Chordroot troot= 0.0753 ft

    ttip= 0.0338 ft

    From the airfoil section, we know :

    Front View

    ttip= 0.0846 Chordtip

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    7/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 7

    Tail Geometry

    Vertical tail :

    Horizontal tail :

    Taper ratio : 0.6

    Aspect ratio : 10

    Sweep angle : 11.4 deg

    No dihedral 1.88 ft

    0.47 ft0.28 ft

    11.4 deg

    Shtail= 0.36 ft2

    Top View

    D

    AACSS

    wing

    htail

    3.0

    0.7 ft

    0.65 ft

    Degrees of freedom on the size for control and stability

    withSwing = 4.16 ft

    2

    AAC = 0.65 ft

    D = 2.25 ft

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    8/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 8

    Wing and Tail Geometry

    Wing Horizontal Tail

    Span 6 ft 1.88 ft

    Sweep

    Angle 9.3 11.4

    Taper Ratio 0.45 0.6

    Dihedral

    Angle 0.73 0

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    9/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 9

    Aircraft Wetted Area

    5.1aircraft

    span

    L

    W

    ftWspan 6

    (Historical data)ftLaircraft 4

    ftHaircraft 45.0

    ftWaircraft 27.0

    2

    3210 579.0 ftAAAAA tttttop 2

    321 117.1 ftAAAA sssside

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    10/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 10

    Aircraft Wetted Area

    )2

    (4.3 sidetop

    wet

    AAS

    Fuselage wetted area estimate :

    Wing/tail wetted area estimate :osedwet SS exp021.2

    Horizontal tail : Sexposed-htail = 0.33 ft2

    Vertical tail : Sexposed-vtail = 0.196 ft2

    Wing : Sexposed-wing = 3.92 ft2

    Fuselage : Swet-fuselage = 2.88 ft2

    vtailwethtailwetwingwetfuselagewetaircraftwet SSSSS

    286.11 ftS aircraftwet

    Swet-wing = 7.92 ft2

    Swet-htail = 0.67 ft2

    Swet-vtail = 0.39 ft2

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    11/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 11

    3-View Drawing

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    12/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 12

    Mathematical Model

    CL:-

    CD:-

    CLMax:- CLat stall

    2

    LoDD kCCC

    2

    AR

    ARCC lL

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    13/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 13

    Mathematical Model

    2D Estimation from XFOIL

    2D Coefficients

    Clo= 0.151

    Cl= 0.104/

    Clmax= 1.082

    Cl vs Alpha

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    -10 -5 0 5 10 15

    Alpha (deg)

    Cl

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    14/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 14

    Mathematical Model

    2D Estimation Cont

    2D Drag Coefficients

    Cdo= 0.00589

    Drag Polar

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

    Cl

    Cd

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    15/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 15

    2D to 3D Calculations

    Find e :64.0)045.01(78.1 68.0 Ae

    793.0e

    Aek

    1

    Find k :

    0464.0k

    Find CDo:

    ref

    wetfDoSSCC

    0157.0DoC

    Find CLfrom lifting line :

    2

    AR

    ARCC lL

    845.0max LC

    Find CDfor 3D :

    2

    LDoD kCCC

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    16/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 16

    2D/3D Comparison

    2D plotted in blue3D plotted in red

    Lift Coefficient

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    -10 -5 0 5 10 15

    Alpha (deg)

    Cl

    Drag Polar

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

    Cl

    Cd

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    17/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 17

    Summery

    Aircraft Geometry:- Airfoil selection for wing and tail

    - Wing and tail configuration

    - Aspect ratio and wetted area

    - 3-View drawing

    Aerodynamic Mathematical Model:

    - CL

    - CD

    - CLMax

  • 7/27/2019 Team 1 Aerodyn1qdr

    18/18

    AAE 451 Team 1 18

    Questions

    Any Questions?