team 6 cleveland clinic improving the patient experience · cleveland clinic –improving the...
TRANSCRIPT
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Team 6
Cleveland Clinic – Improving the Patient Experience
Nashville, December 5th , 2013
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
The Patient Experience at Cleveland Clinic
2
“I have come to understand that there is more to quality healthcare than great outcomes. There is the entire
experience that patients have, from the moment they call for an appointment to the moment they arrive at the hospital –
fearful and concerned- to the moment they get in their cars and drive away” – Dr. Delos Cosgrove, CEO
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Agenda
3
1. Introduction – Cleveland Clinic
2. Cleveland Clinics’ Performance
3. Patients First! Model
4. Success and implications
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Agenda
4
1. Introduction – Cleveland Clinic
2. Cleveland Clinics’ Performance
3. Patients First! Model
4. Success and implications
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Global locations
Worldwide footprint
Overview of Cleveland Clinic
5
Founded in
Cleveland Clinics in numbers
1921
8 community hospitals, 16 family health and ambulatory surgery centers, 59 specialty centers
42,000 employees: over 2,400 staff physicians, 9,000 nurses, and 3,000 affiliated community physicians
4.2 million patient visits, including 167,100 admissions, 191,500 surgical cases, and more than 436,000 emergency visits
Operating revenues of $ 5.9 billion with operating income of $ 250 million in 2010
Worldwide Locations
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Agenda
6
1. Introduction – Cleveland Clinic
2. Cleveland Clinics’ Performance
3. Patients First! Model
4. Success and implications
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler 7
One of the TOP ranked
hospitals
Lerner Research Institution
one of the largest in US
On of the largest medical
education programs
Clinical outcomes
Research
Cleveland Clinics has delivered an outstanding performance in delivering healthcare services
• Highly cost effective
operations and services
Cost containment
• History of breakthrough
medical innovations e.g.
• 1st isolation of serotonin
• 1st bypass surgery
• Nation’s first near-total face
transplant
Innovation
PICTURE
Cleveland Clinic performance in medical outcomes –successful
management of outcomes and costs
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Cleveland Clinics performance in patient experience – still room for
improvement
8
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services
55%
4%
16% 14% 17%10%
5% 4%
33%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
Patient satisfaction scores – US Government Survey (2008 in percentiles)
2008 values
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Agenda
9
1. Introduction – Cleveland Clinic
2. Cleveland Clinics’ Performance
3. Patients First! Model
4. Success and implications
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
The ultimate goal of Cleveland Clinic is to increase their profit by
leveraging their two strategic pillars
10
Reduce cost Improve patient health care
Health care outcomes
Patient Experience
Profit increase
= Reduce cost Increase revenue
High cost pressure due to rising cost in health care in
general
Becomes “commoditized”
Major competitive advantage in the
futureTrend
Strategic pillars
Current status
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Background on the Patient First! model
11
Make patient experience a strategic objective of Cleveland Clinic (2010) – first hospital to
introduce this
Patient experience on mainstream healthcare agenda
Patient satisfaction surveys
Competitiveness at risk
Increasing competition between healthcare providers all delivering the same high quality outcomes -> “commodity”
Patients have greater access to comparative data on providers (since 2008)
HCAHPS1 scores will be linked to federal financial reimbursements
Profitability at risk
Differencing factor / competitive advantage: non pure clinical components such as patient experience
Attracting patients and receiving reimbursements is no longer purely depending on medical outcomes but on patient satisfaction (e.g. empathy)
No. 1 reason for
choosing a hospital:
Patient Experience
1. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
The introduction of the Office of Patient Experience
12
Guiding principals
Most effective initiatives are often the simplest and most-cost efficient (e.g. communication)
Expectations management is key
“Process determines outcome“
Make process and outcomes measurable
Put the patient in charge when possible
Fit Patient Experience under the organizational goal of providing high-quality care at low cost
Making everyone a “care giver”
OPE – Office of Patient Care (2010)
Dr. James Merlino
Chief experience officer
14 staff members working across departments
(2010)
Promote and systematize high-quality care
Ensuring patient comfort
Guarantee patients‘ educational, emotional, and spiritual needs are met
Budget: $6.4 million (2010)
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
OPE programs drive the success of Patients First!
through improved workflow and structure…
13
Physicians are all on one-year salaried contracts, no bonuses and
no financial incentives
Ensuring quality: no unnecessary services Lower cost
Performance analysis: Higher salary through higher quality
An increase in flexibility and saving time improves a patient´s experience
Patients are able to log on through the patient portal, view their
providers entire schedule and make their own appointment
Easier for patients to see the doctors Lower arrival rate λ Lower
queue length L More convenience Higher satisfaction
Claim: „being sure that patients understand what´s going on with
them as well as what´s supposed to happen next“
Creation of educational materials (also online): Providing information
on follow ups, individual visits, continuing care…
Less time spent in process W Lower queue length L
Open access
scheduling
Patient Education
Group practice
Little´s Law:
L λ W=
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
…but also make use of technology in order to
meet the goals of Patients First!
14
Open medical records are now put online in personal health records
Increasing access to electronic patient information
Soon to come: Review of physicians notes for patients available
Lower number of requests Lower process time W Lower L
An increased use of modern technology increases efficiency as well as quality
Email and other electronic formats introduced on the clinic´s patient
portal More convenience
Big savings potential through coaching patients in its use and therefore
eliminating unnecessary office visits
Lower number of patients coming in Lower λ Lower L
Patients are able to enter own data into their patient records
Increasing patient engagement
Information part of clinical workflow Tracking a patient´s progress
Possibility to modify care Quicker healing process Lower
W Lower L and higher quality Higher satisfaction
Two-way messaging via
patient portal
Patient reported
outcomes
Open medical records
policy
Little´s Law:
L λ W=
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Enabling factors for the Patient First! model
15
Establishes a value driven organization including the supporting IT
Institute-based reorganization Information systems
Implementation process
Define team purpose and aim of the department with clear targets
Define measureable outcomes to track the performance of the teams
Align incentives of the different stakeholders
(eg. neurosurgery, neurology and psychiatry)
Establish knowledge management for best practice implementations to speed up process
Use a data to drive operation improvements and cost cutting (e.g. root-cause analysis)
• Provides physicians and patients access to patient specific data
• See prescriptions, set up appointments, notify doctors about changes
MyChart
• Accessible to all physician (licenses also out of network)
• Electronic record system, reorder function and fully integrated administration system
MyPractice
Re-structure clinic into 18 multidisciplinary teamswith experienced physician in the lead (i.e. pooling)
• Single fully integrated medical record system, longitudinal organization by patient
• Most stable available system delivering high performance
IT structure
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Agenda
16
1. Introduction – Cleveland Clinic
2. Cleveland Clinics’ Performance
3. Patients First! Model
4. Success and implications
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Cleveland Clinics Performance in patient experience – after the model
was introduced
17
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services
55%
4%
16% 14%17%
10%5% 4%
33%
92%
71% 72%
64% 66%61%
31%
40%
97%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
Patient satisfaction scores – US Government Survey (2008/12 in percentiles)
Do you remember
this graph?
2008 values 2012 values
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Success of the CC Model
18
HCAHPS Scores
Worldwide Recognition
Overall ranking in CMS survey of patient satisfaction went from average to among the top 8% of
4,600 hospitals included
Overall Hospital Rating Would Recommend Hospital
Recipient of University Healthsystem Consortium(UHC) Rising Star Award by by improving inpatient
centeredness, mortality, equity, efficiency, effectiveness and safety
2013 US News & World Report: #4 Hospital Nationwide; #1 for Cardiology & Heart Surgery
Hospital Execs from all over the world come to CC to learn how it transformed its system
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Looking Forward & Recommendations
19
Healthcare organizations can look to CC’s Patient First! Model to guide simple solutions that will create
a patient-centric environment
Make Patient Experience a strategic priority that gets measured
Use existing measurement tools and make the results public
Ensure employees have a stake in the patient experience. Make
everyone a “Caregivers”
Remember that sometimes the best solutions are the simplest
Key Takeaways from CC
A Need for Patient- Centric
Experience
As of 2012: CMS announced pay for reporting to pay for
performance requirement
Healthcare providers will financially rewarded or penalized
based on certain quality measures, including HCAP scores
2007 McKinsey Study: 41% of respondents said that “Patient
Experience” was the most important influence in choosing a hospital
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Thank you very much for your attention!
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler 21
Sources
Chester, Hermann, Math, Shrestha , Winkler
Sources
James I. Merlino and Ananth Ramanh, May 2013. Health Care’s Service Fanatics. Havard Business Review. hbr.org/2013/05/health-cares-service-fanatics/ar/pr
Ananth Raman and Anita L. Tucker, Feburary 2013. Cleveland Clinic: Improving the Patient Experience. Harvard Business School Publishing
Michael E. Porter and Elizabeth O. Teisberg, February 2010. Cleveland Clinic: Growth Strategy 2012. Harvard Business School Publishing
Michael E. Porter and Thomas H. Lee, October 2013. The Strategy that will fix health care. Havard Business Review
Cleveland Clinic, Spring 2010. Focus on the Patient Experience. clevelandclinic.org
http://www.realworldhealthcare.org/2013/08/cleveland-clinics-value-based-care-team-improves-patient-wait-times-saves-costs/
http://my.clevelandclinic.org/p2/us_news_rankings.aspx
22