technarium hackerspace: informal science & technology learning
TRANSCRIPT
EGLE MARIJA RAMANAUSKAITEEDUCATION POLICY AND CULTURE:
CONSISTENT AND RADICAL TRANSFORMATIONS2016-10-21
TECHNARIUM HACKERSPACE:
COMMUNITY-ENABLED INFORMAL
LEARNING IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
INTRODUCTION• What are hackerspaces/makerspaces?
Source: https://selkirklibrary.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/its-the-new-library-thing-the-makerspace-movement/
Makerspace: space for tech, creatorship, learning
A new big thing in libraries, universities, schools
“hubs for innovation in 21st century”“remaking education”
“transforming the educational landscape”
“pedagogical and physical transformations
of teaching and learning” Sour
ce:
https
://w
ww
.flic
kr.c
om/p
hoto
s/5c
hw4r
7z/1
6350
5989
96
Research is very limited:
• Few researchers have wandered into the field
• Most focus on designed makerspaces, not naturally forming maker/hacker communities
• Looking at learning as goal, but not learning as side-effect
• Limited theoretical approaches (mostly constructionism)
A space is just a space without the people.
• Most research is not exploring the social dimension of learning in these spaces
Hackerspaces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker
Hackerspace: not just a DIY space like any other
Hacking: not just code
You can hack …• Things: make them, fix them, upgrade them. Make
something that has never been made before
• Technology: mix, create, invent new tech
• Even society
• Or education…
• Find a way where there is no way (yet)
Learning is not explicit, but…
The 7 values of the hacker ethic (Himanen, 2001):
• Passion• Freedom• Social worth• Openness • Activity • Creativity • Caring
TECHNARIUM: ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY
(2015 OCT -)
• Technarium (Vilnius, Lithuania) – the only hackerspace in the country
• Everything from metalworks & ceramics to 3D printing & biohacking
• Completely non-commercial, self-evolved space
• Survives only from the community contributions
AIM & OBJECTIVESAim: explore Technarium as a community of practice, where learning opportunities arise spontaneously
Objectives: • Define Technarium as a community of practice
• Explore the local “regime of competence” & members’ attitudes towards science and technology
• Explore the attitudes of Technarium members towards learning
• Identify and describe cases of informal learning
Community of practice model – situated learning(Lave & Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998)
Observation, interviews & conversations, documentation & artefact analysis
Physical space People
Commu-nication Ethos
Artefacts
Participation typesRoles Links in the community
DocumentationInventory
History & historical purpose of the space
RelationshipsDecision makingDistribution of responsibilitiesAttitude towards science & technologySharing (peer-learning)
InventoryProjectsEventsJokesHistorical artefacts
JargonTerminology
Manner of communicationAssimilation of spec. communication
by new members
• The hacker ethos: do, create, care & share, are prominent
• Desire to understand the phenomena, take them apart, find out everything about the technology before using it etc.
Etika, vertybės
• Intrinsic desire to educate the public, to improve the society
• Learning is never the primary motivation, but is a welcome “side-effect” of participation
RESULTS
Ethos
Komunikacija Communication• Unique jargon – sometimes incomprehensible to outsider• Hacker/tech terminology
• Nicknames – natural to members, but confusing to outsiders: opit, mic, ffwd, mn…
• Barrier to participation (as well as learning) • Old-timers know this and translate
Laser labyrinth / harp
project
Conversation about laser production
technologies
Laser physics discussion with member - laser
physicist
Learning happens in unexpected places:
Laser “peeling” during members’ evening
Spaghetti forgotten in
kitchen
Mold microscopy
Everyday bits & jokes become learning experiences:
Travelling joke of “kitten” spaghetti
Microscopy of unexpected things lying around:
Learning from peers with diverse backgrounds & trades:
Openness regardless of background, gender, age, social status:
• “Starving hacker” membership (10 euros/month) or contribution to creation of the space – for those who cannot afford it otherwise
• No gender-based discrimination, few age-based limits, lots of support & encouragement to new members
• Welcoming refugees: workshops, allowing to learn new things, start a new life
The community of practice model is useful for studying learning in hackerspaces, where it is by definition socially-defined
Technarium exhibits many features of a community of practice, and learning is witnessed in & within these features and dynamics
Learning is not a primary motivation, but almost always a “side-effect” in Technarium
Due to the versatility of the space, the various backgrounds of members & attitude towards knowledge & sharing, Technarium creates favorable conditions to learn about science & technology
CONCLUSIONS:
The uniqueness of the space culture & modes of communication could be a barrier to new members, but this barrier is reduced by the efforts of old-timers
Low barrier to entry – newest technologies at hand
OVERALL: a welcoming community orientated towards sharing their knowledge & improving the world
through hacking.
CONCLUSIONS:
THANK YOU!Special thanks to:
Prof. Lilija Duoblienė The rest of the VU Department of Educology!
&The TECHNARIUM community
BLOG.TECHNARIUMAS.LT