technical methods to mitigate seal ... - webgate.ec.europa.eu · there have been various attempts...
TRANSCRIPT
© Natural Resources Institute Finland © Natural Resources Institute Finland
Technical methods to mitigate seal-
induced damages in trap-nets
&
Satellite monitoring of grey seals
caught in pontoon trap-nets in the
Gulf of Finland 2010-2012
Farnet field-trip
26.5.2016 Helsinki
Esa Lehtonen
Natural Resources Institute Finland
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Technical methods to mitigate
seal-induced damages in
trap-nets
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 3
40 000-54 000 grey seals in the entire Baltic Sea area
(counted around 32 000 in year 2015, 60-80 % of the total stock).
In Finnish waters around 11 500 grey seals.
Seal caused damages and economic losses are most severe in salmon, whitefish and
pikeperch fishery
There have been various attempts to mitigate seal-induced damage in the northern Baltic.
Seal-safe trap-net modifications (made of dyneema netting) have shown to be one potential
way to reduce the damage.
However, no single gear modification or scaring device has been shown to provide
complete protection from seal-induced damages so far.
Grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) cause the main damage
in the coastal fishery
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen © Luke, Esa Lehtonen © Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Traditional trap-net models for salmon nowadays just a historical gear ->
Seals have learned to catch fish inside the trap-net
Catching of fish by gilling (mesh bar length 75 mm),
free access for greyseals -> not useful method anymore
Seal-safe Dyneema fish bag
Wire grid
Middle
chamber
Fish bag
Wings
”Sharp
corners”,
3 funnels
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Various seal trap
modifications and
designs tested =>
Without success
Seal trap
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 6
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
Around 250 pontoon trap-nets already in use along the Finnish coast
(main target species: salmon, whitefish, sea trout)
2-layer Dyneema seal-safe
fish chamber
Hauling with air-compressor
Pontoon trap-net = Push-up trap-net
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 7
Stoppnät:
Pontoon trap-net:
hoop ø 3 m: bar length 200 mm, ø 2 mm dyneema netting
The large-mesh protection net in the middle chamber allows fish
(salmon, whitefish, sea trout etc.) to enter the fish chamber but leave
seals outside. Developed by fishermen & KANRA / KEHRA projects
Methods to prevent seals from entering into
the pontoon trap-net fish bag
Middle chamber
Fish chamber
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 8
Protection netting of steel wire, possible to
mitigate seal caused damages in pontoon
trap-nets
Bar length 200-240 mm,
steel wire ø 1 mm
Water visibility and
colour -> effects on
fish behaviour ?
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 9
Satellite monitoring of grey seals
caught in pontoon trap-nets in the
Gulf of Finland 2010-2012
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Aims of the satellite monitoring study
• To study the temporal and spatial behaviour of Baltic grey seals
(Halichoerus grypus) captured with pontoon trap-nets in
collaboration with professional fishermen 2010-2012.
• To compare foraging locations of grey seals to locations of the
trap-nets on the southeast coast of Finland.
• The knowledge can be used for mitigating seal-fishery
interactions and for management of the Baltic grey seal stock.
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 11
Method published: E. Lehtonen, P. Suuronen 2010.
Live-capture of grey seals in a modified salmon trap. Technical note. Fisheries Research 102 (2010) 214-216
Seal trying to reach fish in chamber releases the gate behind
Drawing by Iconex Ltd
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 12
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
Adapter
Shuttle
Message to mobile phone when
the seal is caught in the trap-net
Middle chamber
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 13
GPS antenna ->
GSM antenna ->
Weight 400 g
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Name Weight
kg
Monitoring
start
Monitoring
end
Days Locations
Kasimir, KA-10 125 1.7.2010 2.11.2010 124 2391
Crispen, CR-10 88 25.10.10 14.3.2011 140 4223
Otro, OT-10 123 13.11.10 24.4.2011 162 5683
Stig, ST-11 133 5.6.2011 12.6.2011 7 99
Ahti, AH-11 113 22.6.2011 18.4.2012 301 6030
Arnold, AD-11 156 7.8.2011 27.10.2011 81 781
Tyko, TY-11 173 24.8.2011 14.10.2011 51 479
Benjamin, BE-11 121 30.8.2011 4.2.2012 156 979
Voitto, VO-11 128 16.9.2011 10.3.2012 175 1662
Monitoring of grey seals in the Gulf of Finland 2010-2012
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Pontoon trap-net
Trap-net (hoops)
Fish farm
Main foraging areas 2011
Locations of 4 seals
4 grey seals feeding
in trap-nets
Catching & release site, Loviisa Söderby +
Tyko
Ahti
Benjamin Arnold
Ahti
Arnold
Benjamin
Tyko
Satellite monitoring of grey seals in 2011, main foraging areas
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 16
Russian border
Itäkivi
2011 tagged grey seals stayed the entire
summer and fall period in the Eastern Gulf of Finland.
Frequent visits from haul-out sites to
trap-net fishing sites
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Migration from Gulf of Finland tagging site to the southern Baltic in fall 2011 (900
km). During four months winter period the total migration distance of 2600 km.
The last location was received from the Gulf of Finland seal sanctuary
Sandkallan 28.3.2012
Grey seal ”Voitto” (128 kg)
”Baltic Sea cruiser”
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
• Some grey seal individuals specialise in foraging in and close to
the trap-nets (in 2010-2011 tagging experiments 6 out of 8 grey
seals).
• Only male grey seals of different ages visit the pontoon trap-
nets. The movements concentrated near the coasts during the
autumn. Important prey species of grey seals as well as
commercial trap-net fishing can be found in the same area.
• The grey seal habitat use changes in winter, as they avoid
ice-covered areas.
RESULTS
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
A 88 kg male grey seal ”Crispen” was released
three times from the same pontoon trap-net in
Gulf of Finland 2010 => evidense of specialisation
Selective removal of grey seals overlapping with fishery
can be considered a effective locally focused method to mitigate
damages caused to fishery.
RESULTS (continue)
© Luke, Esa Lehtonen
© Natural Resources Institute Finland 20
Tagging project financed by: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2008-2009), FGFRI, South Finland FLAG ESKO and Sandmans stiftelse (2010-2011)
The report published in April 2013, Riista- ja kalatalous Tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä
1 /2013 and in Marine Ecology Progress Series Vol.507:297-308, 2014