technische universität münchen november 2014
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given to a wide audience of professionals at the Technische Universität München detailing the transition from 2D to 3D to BIM in November 2014. The route taken and how we adopted this into our daily workflow including our upgrade path. Also discussed are the immediate benefits to the process for Architects Contractors and ultimately Client. It covers some of the pitfalls encountered and passes on lessons learnt during the process to inform the wider professional team. The presentation also looks at a completed projects utilising the workflow discussing how 3D / BIM obtained faster sign offs and client buy in at conceptual phase and off site manufacture.TRANSCRIPT
This has to be the
way forward.
Chartered Architectural Technologist
Chartered Construction Manager
Joined The Design Buro in 1994, became Director in 2005
Responsible for implementation of BIM within the practice
2014 Joined BIM Technologies
Neil Marshall MCIAT MCIOB
Accessibility is central to the
design of any environment. If we can
visualise the design from every angle, we
can be sure that we are fulfilling client
objectives and delivering an environment
that works.
The people are key to the delivery of
projects, It is vitally important they are
engaged and fully involved in the decision
making processes.
Planning is vitally important. A
structured approach means that we deliver
on time and within budget. Offering advice
and support throughout the life of a project,
encouraging and developing long term
partnerships.
Meticulous about offering choice
because an educated choice is the only
way you can decide on the most effective
design solution.
Architecture
Strategic Planning
Interior Design
Project Management
BIM Consultancy
CDM
Landscape Design
When? 2008
What?
Why?
Next?
By?
All Laing O’Rourke Projects
to be BIM by 2010
DfMA (Design for Manufacture
& Assembly)
Do nothing?
Relax – no pressure!
Research
Lots of it!
Frustration
Conflicts
Assign lead
We knew we needed to fully
understand BIM as our main client
group was government funded
Crash Course
Pathology scheme won in 2011
Given option to use BIM
Jumped at chance
Full design team (architect/structural
engineer, M&E engineer, contractor) willing
to try BIM
Contractor was kind & stated you can go
back to 2D – phew!
What they wanted
Floor areas
Linear measurements
Wall areas
Ceilings – coordinated “areas”
Envelope quantities
FFE schedules
Model for federation “clash detection”
What we wanted
No real concept at this point of what could
be achieved
Education from
Tier 1 Contractor
Upgraded selected users to “Architect” version as fundamental version
did not give us the tools needed. Being selective was a mistake.
Basic 3D training in VectorWorks Architect
Advanced 3D training in VectorWorks Architect
• Spaces
• Stories
• Model set-up
• Workgroup ref
In-house training
• Strategic steps
• drop in sessions
• one-to-one
• “just in time”
• upskill a team
Training from Computers Unlimited
2D process had to continue,
speed of scheme dictated this
Learning
3D process was started in parallel
Lead-in
Inaccurate
Masked issues
Visual only
BIM Development
Generic modelling
Low level of development
Unintelligent “limited data” but sufficient to meet protocols
Leap of Faith
We became aware very quickly that
the 3D team was on the tail of the
2D team
The images and results from the 3D
model were noticeably quicker and
more accurate
The 3D images were conveying the
design better
We took the decision to stop the 2D
team and apply all resources to 3D –
this then delivered the planning
drawings via the model
Outputs
Drawing structure –
based on Computers Unlimited Training
Outputs
DE
FIN
ED
WIN
DO
WS
DE
FIN
ED
WA
LL
S
Content
Pathology, Glan Clywd Hospital
HA
ND
OV
ER
JU
LY
20
13
Why continue with BIM?
• Government Construction Strategy??
2.32 Government will require fully collaborative 3D BIM
(with all project and asset information, documentation
and data being electronic) as a minimum by 2016
> All centrally procured contracts by 2016
> Four pathfinder trial projects are underway in the MoJ
and other departments
> Suite of seven document “standards”
> Regional hubs
Because we have witnessed a substantial
improvement in quality, outcome and design …
The direction is clear!
Training can take many forms – don’t rely on
just one method – different people need
different training to suit job specific needs
Strategic steps to BIM
Drop in sessions
One to one training
Just in time training
ICCU, Manor Hospital, Walsall
Early user involvement
Speed up sign-off process
Visuals from model (single
source of truth)
Better buy-in by stakeholders
De-risks the process by
involving all stakeholders
Make better decisions to
inform outcomes
CAMHS, Ardenleigh Centre, Birmingham
Schedules, elevations, sections from the model
3D views from model
Better user engagement
Single source of truth
No ambiguity between documents
“Our Light bulb Moment….”
Did the contractor want IFC? Not really, they wanted native file format but it soon
became obvious there were three authoring platforms in the team.
Common Exchange IFC
Luck?
Learn?
Feedback?
NATIVE MODEL
VW IFC MANAGER
It is now we realise the importance of OpenBIM we need to share models now and in
the future. Our models need to have longevity and this is achieved through OpenBIM
Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)
Test prior to issue very important
Was the output useable?
Validation tool – FREE Solibri model
viewer
Validate
Architectural
Structural
MEP
Contractor – BIM Manager
Software – Navisworks
Fortnightly Design Team Meetings
Reports “clashes” issue by BIM
Manager
Justification – it works
Federate
Clash detection
Thorough reporting
Federate
Report on clashes for discipline to
correct prior to next Design Team
Meeting.
BIM Manager ran custom rule sets to
establish prefabrication elements.
Co-ordination
Federate
2013 was about learning and education
2014 is about…
IMPLEMENTATION
Just do it!
PRACTICE
Time to understand
Mind shift
GET IT WRONG!
Capture mistakes and
share
COBIE
No? Yes? When?