tectonic evolution of the bristol channel borderlands chapter 5
DESCRIPTION
Structure of the Vale of GlamorganTRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN
Page 5-0
‘The clotted vibrancy of spring no longer
overflows with my spirit. It slips sparsely
and powerless into the convoluted locks of hair
of the lost correspondent. The wind dries it up,
the sea remains uncured. It will never meet with
the sick bees, it no longer soaks my handkerchief,
it does not tolerate the inexpressible force for
new life.’
Based on Crude Oil by:
NIKOS ALEXIS ASLANOGLOU
and its translation by:
M.B. RAIZIS.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-1
5. GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC REFLECTION SECTIONS
FROM THE VALE OF GLAMORGAN, SOUTH WALES.
5.1 AIMS
The aims of the chapter are: (1) to investigate the pre-Mesozoic stratigraphy of the Vale of
Glamorgan using seismic reflection sections, complemented by seismic refraction data; (2) to
identify the main geological structures displayed on the reflection sections and to interpret
them using the geological control provided by local Palaeozoic inliers; and (3) to use the
structural data to deduce a regional structural evolution and to investigate the occurrence of
any basement-related, fault reactivation events.
5.2 INTRODUCTION
Three reflection lines were shot in the Vale of Glamorgan by Shell UK Expro during August
1989 who has kindly made the data available to the current research project. The data consist
of two north-south dip sections (SG89-01V and SG89-02V) and an east-west strike section
(SG89-03V). The dip sections are about 22km long and extend from the coast of the Vale
northwards to the south crop of the coalfield. The strike section is about 16km in length and
ties the southern ends of the dip sections (Fig. 5.1).
The reflection data were acquired using a Vibroseis source (this equipment and vehicles are
described by Dobrin & Savit (1988)). The energy source consisted of four vibrators at 10m
separation.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-2
The geophone array length was 23.92m consisting of 2 strings of 12 geophones in line at a
spacing of 1.04m. The fold of coverage was a nominal 60 fold. Digital data recording tapes as
well as complete filtered stack and migrated reflection sections were provided for analysis.
Geophysical investigation of the seismic data was carried out by Hillier (1992) for the purpose
of analysing potential basement events beneath the Vale of Glamorgan as part of a PhD
project. Geological analysis of the general structure was undertaken by the author. The
seismic data have thus been incorporated into two related structural topics: the first correlating
the reflection data with regional-scale refraction profiles in South Wales and the second
correlating the reflection data with detailed onshore geological surveys. The two analyses
were intended to assist in establishing the regional stratigraphy and structure and to contribute
to an evolutionary model of the geology of the Bristol Channel Borderlands.
The seismic reflection data (hereinafter, Vale reflection lines) image the Variscan structure
concealed by the veneer of Mesozoic strata and, in terms of subsurface geology, are also
important in providing a link with the reflection data from the Bristol Channel (discussed in
Chapter 6).
5.3 METHODOLOGY
Initially, depth conversion of selected reflection events was carried out using interval and
stacking velocity information and a GWBASIC program (Appendix 5.2) to assist in their
geological identification. Depth-converted reflection events were also compared with refractor
depths derived from complementary wide-angle quarry blast and marine seismic lines (Hillier,
1992).
Secondly, line drawings of the geometrical configuration of prominent reflection events
(marker horizons) were produced. Groups of reflectors were then organised into seismic
packages, including cross cutting features, for the purpose of seismic mapping, i.e. correlation
of the main events and packages across the sections.
Other methods of seismic interpretation were also utilised e.g. (Fitch, 1976; Anstey, 1977;
Brown & Fisher, 1980; Kleyn, 1982; Sheriff, 1982; McQuillin et al, 1984; Jenyon & Fitch,
1985).
The results obtained from seismic interpretation were used to produce various geological
models compatible with the surface geology.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-3
5.4 PRE-MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE VALE OF GLAMORGAN AND
SURROUNDING AREAS.
This chapter presents a geological interpretation of the Vale reflection lines. The geological
controls for interpretation of the reflection data are (a) inliers of Palaeozoic rocks in the Vale;
(b) deep boreholes; and (c) relevant outcrops in surrounding areas.
The exposed pre-Mesozoic sequence in the Vale of Glamorgan is at least 2km thick,
consisting of an unknown thickness of Silurian, at least 1km of Devonian and about 1km of
Carboniferous Limestone. It is likely that Upper Carboniferous strata are also concealed
beneath the Mesozoic cover of Penmark so that 2km is certainly a minimum value. However,
the total thickness of seismically layered, sub-Mesozoic sequence on line SG89-02V, beneath
shot point 500 and above anticipated basement, is about 6.5km. Clearly there is about 4.5km
of unexposed layered sequence beneath the Vale of Glamorgan. Different possibilities to
explain the composition of the entire sequence to basement depths are presented below after a
systematic correlation of seismic packages on lines SG89-01V to 03V with the general
stratigraphy of the Vale of Glamorgan and adjacent areas.
There is a clear problem in interpreting the Vale reflection lines in that 4.5km of sequence
remains undefined. However borehole data of Cambrian Exploration Ltd extend local
stratigraphic information down to the Ordovician. They revealed a Silurian thickness of 360-
390m and also evidence for an unknown thickness of Ordovician volcanics (Fig. 5.2).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-4
The only other information on deep structure is upper crustal models based on large scale
refraction/wide angle surveys (Mechie & Brooks, 1984). These defined a deep basement
surface at about 6km (on Line J) succeeded by a Precambrian suprabasement/Lower
Palaeozoic layer about 3-4km thick (extending from a depth of about 2-3km to 6km depth).
These albeit approximate depth values correlate with the 2km and 6.5km depth estimates to
the top of the Lower Palaeozoic and the base of the seismically layered sequence, interpreted
here as the basement surface.
If the above correlation is correct, the Vale reflection lines confirm the presence of a thick
Precambrian suprabasement/Lower Palaeozoic layer which can now be said to be layered,
composite and to contain a number of discordances. Surrounding regions are now considered
for possible analogous rocks at outcrop.
The following areas were studied: Johnston, St David's and Carmarthen (Precambrian); SW
Dyfed, Builth Wells, Malverns, Usk, Bristol district and Rumney (Lower Palaeozoic); SW
Dyfed and Vale of Glamorgan (Devonian); Gower Peninsula, Vale of Glamorgan and Taff's
Well (Carboniferous Limestone); South Wales Coalfield - south crop (Upper Carboniferous).
5.4.1 PRECAMBRIAN AND LOWER PALAEOZOIC
SW Dyfed contains major outcrops of Precambrian crystalline basement and volcanics (Baker,
1971, 1982) and Lower Palaeozoic marginal basin sediments (Woodcock, 1990). These
geological elements of SW Dyfed are likely to be represented in the deep structure of central
South Wales. In particular, the Vale of Glamorgan is likely to be underlain by a Precambrian
and Lower Paleozoic sequence more akin to the sequence cropping out in SW Dyfed than to
the condensed sequence of the Welsh Borderlands.
Precambrian Basement
The major refracting boundary identified by Mechie & Brooks (1984) at a depth of <1km in
the St David's area and at 4km in the south below St Govan's Head (Fig. 5.3a) was correlated
locally with basement rock which crops out to form the Johnston Block (elevated to its
structural position by the Johnston Thrust (Dunne, 1983) and regionally with a widespread
basal refractor beneath South Wales.
The Johnston Block consists of quartz diorites, quartz albite intermediates and quartz dolerites
(Strachan et al, 1914; BGS 1:50 000 sheet 228, Haverfordwest) and has been observed to
structurally overlie Coal Measure strata at e.g. Ticklas Point (Fig. 5.3b). Similar crystalline
rocks may thus form the basement beneath the Vale of Glamorgan.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-5
Precambrian layered series
The Dimetian and Pebidian layered series of SW Dyfed was first described by Hicks (1877,
1884). Blake (1884) subdivided the series into two volcanic suites: a lower trachytic series
succeeded by a rhyolitic series. Basic intrusives and minor volcanics in the complex were
thought by Blake to mark late and separate phases of igneous activity. Recent trace element
geochemical investigations by Thorpe (1972) proved an association of this igneous complex
with active plate margin processes. The Dimetian and Pebidian volcanics, being part of this
complex, therefore represent the oldest record of regional tectonism in the Bristol Channel
Borderlands.
It is likely that the Precambrian layered series is not restricted to SW Dyfed, and it could
underlie the Vale of Glamorgan in a similar fashion to the regional crystalline basement
surface of Bayerly & Brooks (1980) and Mechie & Brooks (1984) unless their extent is
limited by major 'Caledonoid' lineaments. Further evidence for the continuation to the east of
a Precambrian layered sequence is the occurrence of Precambrian sedimentary rocks in
Carmarthen (Cope, in press) as well as the Precambrian volcanics of the Midland Platform.
Such layered sequences of the volcanic series would be expected to generate a prominent
reflector package on seismic reflection sections.
Lower Palaeozoic
The Lower Palaeozoic sequence of SW Dyfed represents a back-arc basin succession along
the southern flank of the Welsh Basin (Anderton et al, 1979; Woodcock, 1984, 1990;
Kokelaar, 1988; Dimberline et al, 1990) unlike the marginal shelf setting of the Lower
Palaeozoic strata of the Welsh Borderlands.
The sequence consists of transgressive, intrashelf marine Cambrian facies (Green, 1908;
Anderton et al, 1979) extending to N Wales (Crimes, 1970) and on the platform to the east of
the Welsh Basin; an Ordovician benthic and intrashelf marine facies (Evans, 1906; Green,
1908; Williams et al, 1972; Traynor, 1988) and volcanic facies (Ziegler et al, 1969; Fitton &
Hughes, 1970; Traynor, 1988); a Silurian intrashelf marine regressive facies (Walmsley &
Bassett, 1976) extending into the Welsh Borderlands (Richardson & Rasul, 1990) and Siluro-
Devonian marine-nonmarine transitional facies (Allen et al, 1976; Allen & Williams, 1978).
From seismic refraction studies, Mechie & Brooks (1984) have postulated the occurrence of a
2-3km thick succession of Lower Palaeozoic strata beneath central South Wales. A thick
succession occurs in SW Dyfed so that this area represents a good onshore analogue.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-6
In support of this inference, the following sequences of SW Dyfed would be expected to
contain good seismic reflective horizons: the Upper Ordovician - Lower Silurian Skomer
Volcanic Series; the Llandeilo Limestone; the Silurian Robeston Wathen Limestone and
Shoalshook Limestone; the Wenlock and Ludlow Coralliferous Series and Sandstone Series.
Other Ordovician and Silurian sequences nearby are the series of Middle Ordovician grey-
green tuffs and rhyolites of Builth Wells and the sequence in the Silurian inlier of Cardiff
(Anderson, 1971) consisting of an unknown thickness of Ludlovian Rumney Grits (indurated,
fine grained, lithic-quartz arenites and wackes) and thinly-bedded, fossiliferous, calcareous-
quartz wackes.
It is also equally possible that the reflective sub-Devonian sequences represented on the Vale
seismic sections result from highly-indurated, layered sequences similar to those described
above i.e. generally Ordovician Volcanics or a condensed Silurian sequence resting upon a
thick Cambrian sequence. However there is a problem in explaining the entire thickness of
imaged layered sequence if a condensed sequence is considered.
Further areas of relevance to the deep geology of the Vale include the Lower Palaeozoic
inliers of the Bristol District e.g. the Tortworth Inlier. If the present thickness of layered
sequence beneath the Vale of Glamorgan represents a tectonic thickness the condensed
sequence of Bristol would also become a suitable analogue. Of particular interest in such a
case would be the unconformity between Llandoverian Lower Trap basaltic lavas, sandstone
and shales (about 500m) and the Tremadocian Micklewood Bed shales (at least 150m). A
similar unconformity occurs in the Malvern Hills (Brooks, 1970) indicating that the absence
of most of the Ordovician is a regional phenomenon and could characterise the Vale of
Glamorgan. If the unconformity occurs beneath the Vale its depth can best be estimated from
the thickness of Silurian strata of the Usk inlier.
5.4.2 UPPER PALAEOZOIC
Devonian
The Devonian sequence in the Cardiff District consists of the Lower Old Red Sandstone Red
Marls (800m), Llanishen Conglomerate (130), Brownstones (160m) and the Upper Old Red
Sandstone Quartz Conglomerate (40m) and has a minimum stratigraphic thickness of 1km.
Emphasis is placed here on the limited thickness of Upper Devonian. Devonian strata should
therefore account for the first kilometre beneath the Mesozoic veneer in the eastern part of the
Vale.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-7
Lithic components of coarse grained lithologies provide further evidence of the sub-Devonian
geology of the Bristol Channel area in addition to the direct evidence from the Silurian inliers
of Rumney, Usk and the Bristol district. Evidence for the type of sub-Devonian sequence
comes from the composition of clasts in Lower-Middle Devonian conglomerates exposed in
SW Dyfed and the Vale of Glamorgan e.g. the Ridgeway Conglomerate and the Llanishen
Conglomerate. The sedimentary lithic clasts are probably derived from Lower Devonian
sediments and to a lesser extent from Lower Palaeozoic. Crystalline lithic clasts are derived
from basement rocks, beneath the Bristol Channel (Williams, 1971), uplifted during Mid
Devonian times to form the Bristol Channel Landmass (Tunbridge, 1986). It is also possible
that some clasts were derived from local fault blocks such as the uplifted block associated
with the Ritec Fault in SW Dyfed and the separate Cowbridge Lineament in the Vale of
Glamorgan.
A test of the relative importance of local source areas in relation to the Bristol Channel
Landmass and, thus, of determining the sub-Devonian succession beneath the Vale of
Glamorgan is to compare the clast compositions of the Ridgeway conglomerate and the
Llanishen conglomerate. Such a study could be extended with potentially beneficial results to
Middle Devonian formations of North Devon (after e.g. Tunbridge, 1980) and to the Lower
and Upper Devonian of the Mendips at Portishead Bed levels.
Lower Carboniferous
Exposures of Carboniferous Limestone were examined along the west coast of the Vale of
Glamorgan and, inland, in quarries and road sections to obtain stratigraphic information
directly relevant to the Vale reflection lines. Results were also obtained from examination of
limestone on the Gower Peninsula and Taff's Well (section 5.5). Further stratigraphic
information of the Carboniferous Limestone was obtained from 10cm diameter BGS half-core
from Ogmore (Beacons Down Borehole) and from the recent BGS 1:50 000 series sheet
261/262 Bridgend. Selected BGS 1:10 000 series maps were also used to correlate seismic
marker horizons with limestone lithostratigraphy. Two significant limestone formations are
transected by Line SG89-02V: the Gully Oolite and the Friar's Point Limestone. Emphasis is
placed here on the Chadian Gully Oolite of Waters & Lawrence (1987) because the
extrapolation of a prominent marker horizon to surface predicts that it originates within
middle-upper sections of this formation (see details on reflector A in section 5.5).
General estimates of thickness of Carboniferous Limestone from BGS maps vary from about
1km in Porthcawl, 800m in St. Brides to about 600m in Taff's Well.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-8
Upper Carboniferous
Two adjacent areas contain Upper Carboniferous strata: the offshore Inner Bristol Channel,
south of Tusker Rock (BGS 1:250 000 sheet 51°N - 4°W Bristol Channel) and the south crop
of the coalfield. Examination of Namurian isopach maps by George (1970) points to a
maximum thickness of about 500m south of Margam. In line with the general thickness and
grainsize trends for the Namurian a much thinner sequence is probably concealed beneath the
Vale of Glamorgan along an axis from Wick to Penmark and probably consists of finer
sediments than those exposed further north. However the presence of Westphalian rocks
adjacent to Carboniferous Limestone south of Tusker Rock may suggest an absence of
Namurian south of the Cowbridge Anticline.
5.5 THE VALE REFLECTION LINES: DATA DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS.
5.5.1 SECTION SG89 02V, MIGRATED STACK
This section (Fig. 5.4a) reveals four seismic markers (A to D) which represent major
lithostratigraphic divisions and outline the Variscan structure. Reflectors E and F represent
segments of a major Variscan thrust which may substantially repeat the seismic markers.
Reflector A
Seismic reflectors are prominent across the whole section and extend to two-way reflection
times of 2.75s at the southern end of the line (Fig. 5.4b). The section reveals a thin
discontinuous veneer extending down to 0.2s TWTT which discordantly overlies an undulose
prominent reflector (reflector A) in the southern 7.5km of the section (Fig. 5.5a). Reflector A
varies in depth from surface to 0.44s TWTT. The discordant contact is taken to represent the
unconformity between the folded Upper Palaeozoic and the horizontal Mesozoic above.
Two possible interpretations of reflector A are that it represents (1) a significant facies
boundary within the Carboniferous Limestone and (2) the boundary between the Old Red
Sandstone and the Carboniferous Limestone.
In support of (1) above, the up-dip extrapolation of reflector A reaches outcrops of Chadian
Gully Oolite (Fig. 5.5a). Friar's Point Limestone crops out stratigraphically beneath the
upward extrapolation of reflector A. There is evidence for rapid facies changes on Flat Holm
(Fig. 5.5b). Interbeds of indurated limestone and soft shale are expected to be reflective in
seismic experiments. Similar intra-Dinantian facies changes could give rise to reflector A and
package A (refer to section 5.5.2 reflector A).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-9
Indirect evidence for (1) above is that the boundary between the Carboniferous Limestone and
Devonian along the south crop is indistinct (Fig. 5.6). However the absence of a decisive
boundary may also be due to a number of geophysical reasons such as interference due to the
moderate dip of Carboniferous Limestone and a low signal to urban noise ratio.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-10
In support of (2) above, if a seismic velocity of 5.2kms-1 is assigned to the thickest part of the
sequence (0.25s TWTT) directly above reflector A, the sequence has an actual thickness of
about 700m. This value is in close agreement with 1km thickness estimated for the
Carboniferous Limestone of Porthcawl (George, 1970). The prominence of reflector A
suggests a boundary of major acoustic impedance contrast. A significant contrast is expected
for the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary because seismic velocity changes from 5.2kms-1
downwards to 4.8kms-1.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-11
Layer B
There is a transparent zone (layer B) occupying about 0.45s TWTT beneath reflector A (0.45 -
0.9s TWTT at the southern end of the section). Beneath layer B there are prominent reflection
events eg, from 0.9 to 1.55s TWTT beneath shot point 440 (Fig. 5.8) defining an underlying
layer C. Traced northwards up dip, layer B reaches surface in an area of ORS outcrop in the
core of the Cowbridge Anticline. Assigning a seismic velocity of 4.8kms-1 to layer B,
characteristic of the ORS (Mechie & Brooks, 1984), then 0.45s TWTT represents a thickness
of about 1km. This compares well with the thickness estimated from the stratigraphy of the
Cardiff district. Assuming no major stratigraphic omissions between layers B and C the upper
boundary of layer C represents a horizon close to the Devonian-Silurian boundary (see
discussion for possibility of a Siluro-Devonian unconformity).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-12
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-13
Layer C
The prominent reflectors of layer C are inferred to represent lithologically distinctive layers
near the top of the local Silurian sequence eg in the Rumney and Usk inliers. Layer C may
also be partly equivalent to Silurian strata of the Bristol district and the Welsh Borderlands or
SW Dyfed.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-14
Folding and discordant relations occur in parts of layer C, for example beneath shot point 600
at 0.9s TWTT (Fig. 5.8). On a kilometre scale, Layer C is folded by the Cowbridge Anticline
and lies closest to the surface along its axial plane at 0.5 to 1.1s TWTT. At the levels given
above there are discordant packages of reflectors. In contrast, the simplest sequence, in layer
C, is to the south of the discordant packages and consists of an upper unit of prominent
reflectors from 0.9-1.2s TWTT above a middle transparent unit from 1.2-1.4s TWTT and a
lower reflective unit from 1.4-1.55s TWTT (Fig. 5.8).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-15
Assigning to layer C a seismic velocity of 5.5kms-1, characteristic of Lower Palaeozoic rocks
in the Bristol Channel area (Mechie & Brooks, 1984), 0.65s TWTT (0.9 to 1.55s) represents a
thickness of about 2km. This greatly exceeds the exposed thickness of Silurian in Cardiff,
Bristol or the Welsh Borderlands.
Two possible interpretations for the composition of layer C are: (1) a thick Ordovician-
Silurian sequence analogous to that of SW Dyfed; (2) a thin Silurian sequence of about 400m
above a Cambrian-Silurian unconformity below which there is a thick Cambrian and possibly
Precambrian sequence of about 1600m.
Layer D
Layer D (directly beneath layer C, below shot point 420) has a similar appearance to layer C
consisting of two reflective units bounding a middle transparent zone (Fig. 5.8). Layer D,
extends from 1.75-2.5s TWTT which represents a depth converted thickness of 2km at an
interval velocity of 5.5kms-1. If Layer D represents an indurated layered Precambrian
sequence of higher velocity (eg 6.0kms-1) a depth converted thickness of 2.3km is obtained.
Three possible interpretations for the composition of layer D are (1) part of a complete Lower
Palaeozoic and Precambrian sequence; (2) a tectonic repetition of layer C as suggested by
Hillier (1992); and (3) exclusively Precambrian acid volcanic series of SW Dyfed.
Structure
Reflector A is folded into a gentle synform and shows southward verging minor folds on its
southern limb and downward, northward verging discordant events close to its axis, further
north (Fig. 5.5). The axis of the synform lies beneath the village of Penmark. Closely spaced
sub-prominent reflectors occur beneath reflector A outlining the synform (Fig. 5.5) and the
structure is here named the Penmark Syncline. The discordant events within the reflector
package may represent back thrusts and refolded northward directed thrusts of the type
observed in Carboniferous Limestone quarries and MCM opencast coal sites along the south
crop and in the Gower (Fig. 5.7). The Penmark Syncline is also developed to a lesser extent
within the Mesozoic veneer.
The main structure displayed on the seismic section involves the northern limb of the
Penmark Syncline and the northward dipping south crop of the coalfield which is imaged in
the northern part of the section. From inspection of geological maps of the area (BGS 1:50
000 series sheet 261/262 Bridgend) this is here defined as a section through the Cowbridge
Anticline.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-16
The structure observed in layer C beneath the Cowbridge Anticline may represent a complexly
thrusted fold or possibly a decametre scale antiformally stacked thrust duplex (Fig. 5.9). The
strong, moderately southward dipping event (reflector E) shows strong discordance with
weaker reflectors below but is sub-parallel to reflectors above. Reflector E could be correlated
with the sub-horizontal reflector F, to the north, (Fig. 5.9) on the basis of seismic prominence
and tentatively extended southwards between layers C and D.
In this model Reflectors E-F represent a major thrust, repeating the Lower Palaeozoic
sequence beneath the southern limb of the Cowbridge Anticline, which decreases rapidly in
dip below shot point 1060. In this model the Cowbridge Anticline can either be described as
of character like a ramp anticline or even an antiform above a stacked duplex (section 5.7). In
a thrust repeat model for layers C and D, involving a condensed Lower Palaeozoic sequence,
Silurian strata would occupy about 0.2s TWTT so that the remaining 0.45s TWTT would
represent repeated pre-Silurian strata and basement. In the case of a pre-Llandoverian
unconformity model about 1.6km of Cambrian and Precambrian would be repeated once:
� Silurian 2(400m) + Cambrian 2(1.6km) = 4km of layered sequence.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-17
A diffuse zone occurs between shot points 1280 and 1400 at depths of 0.7s TWTT, though
some southward dipping reflectors do occur. These contrast strongly with folded prominent
reflectors dipping mainly northwards at the northern limits of the section. The overall view is
of a complex antiform at depth whose northern limb forms a discordance beneath the
northward dipping reflectors of the south crop.
Unlike deeper levels of the section below shot point 460, in the north, below shot point 1360,
there are no distinct reflectors. Below shot points 600 to 860, layer D is gently folded with a
sub-horizontal southern limb and a gently north-dipping northern limb. The hinge of the fold,
at the top of layer D, is 3.5km to the south of the complex antiformal stack above.
5.5.2 SECTION SG89 03V, FILTERED STACK
Section SG89 03V runs approximately along the trend of the Cowbridge Anticline and clearly
displays the Mesozoic veneer, down to 0.1s TWTT, above deeper reflectors at 0.3s and 0.75s
TWTT which probably represent Palaeozoic strata. The unconformable relationship between
the Mesozoic and sub-Mesozoic sequence is excellently displayed beneath shot points 820-
840 where gently dipping sub-Mesozoic reflectors are truncated by the horizontal Mesozoic
reflectors (Fig. 5.10).
Reflector A - package A
The most prominent reflector at shallow levels continues, almost unbroken, across the whole
section (Fig. 5.10). The event is weakest between shot points 880-1080 but strengthens
towards shot point 1320.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-18
This major reflector can be correlated directly with reflector A on section SG89-02V and is
thus taken to represent a horizon within the Chadian Gully Oolite or the base of the
Carboniferous Limestone.
Underlying weaker events, such as at 0.4s TWTT beneath shot point 340, represent layers
within the lower part of the Carboniferous Limestone sequence. The entire package of
reflectors (package A) associated with reflector A extends vertically from 0.2-0.45s TWTT,
which represents a thickness of 700m. The complete sequence from the line of the
unconformity to the base of the package A is about 900m thick. This probably represents the
thickness of Carboniferous strata in the southern part of the Vale of Glamorgan. It is
interesting to note the similarity between package A and the South Scarweather package
imaged on offshore seismic data (Chapter 6). Correlation of seismic signature from this line to
dip sections beneath the Bristol Channel could represent a means of establishing a
stratigraphic marker horizon for the offshore data.
Layer B
Beneath package A there is a transparent zone from about 0.45-0.75s TWTT below shot point
720. This is best developed under the section of line SG89 03V between N-S lines SG89 01V
and SG89 02V, but is nevertheless correlated, on the grounds of position and seismic
character, with layer B (Devonian ORS). Layer B thins rapidly towards the west over a
distance of about 5km and is discordant with reflectors below. The seismic nature of the
sequence beneath this layer is very similar to layer C on line SG89 02V. There is the same
threefold constitution with a thick reflective upper layer and a thin, prominent, lower layer
bounding a middle, transparent zone (Fig. 5.11).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-19
Layer C
Layer C clearly dips towards the ESE. Picking a horizon within its upper layer, it dips from
0.7s TWTT to 0.85s TWTT over 3km indicating a depth converted apparent dip of about 8°.
Package A and layer B above are sub horizontal and truncate layer C.
There is good evidence for discordances also within layer C, such as at 1.1s TWTT below shot
point 720 (Fig. 5.11).
There are two possible interpretations for the discordances between package A and Layer C
and within layer C (1) structural and (2) stratigraphic. In support of (1) above, layer C may
contain a thrust such as one indicated by reflector E which climbs towards the west of the
strike section possibly up to Carboniferous Limestone levels. In support of (2) above, the dip
of the Lower Palaeozoic sequence can be attributed to late Caledonian structure which caused
the variation in the thickness of the ORS (layer B) above, and an unconformity similar to that
near the Carreg Cennen Disturbance (George, 1970).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-20
5.5.3 SECTION SG89 01V, MIGRATED STACK
The southern end of the section contains the most prominent reflectors, at shallow levels 0-
0.35s TWTT. The Mesozoic veneer extends down to 0.08s TWTT and unconformably
overlies a weakly reflective sequence above a strong event correlated with reflector A of
previous sections (Fig. 5.12). There is a gently folded syncline beneath the veneer which can
be traced down to reflector A and probably represents the westward continuation of the
Penmark Syncline (Fig. 5.12). The structure to the north is far less evident than on line SG89
02V. However reflector A can be traced northwards to shot point 1280. A thin south dipping
package, package A2, of closely spaced reflectors extends from 0.2s TWTT below shot point
1240 to the surface at shot point 1100 where Barry Harbour Limestone crops out (Fig. 5.13).
Package A2 and reflector A probably represent horizons within the Carboniferous Limestone.
The contrast in seismic signature between package A2 and reflector A suggests they represent
different horizons so that reflector A cannot be simply extrapolated northwards through
package A2.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-21
Below package A2 there are further prominent reflectors which dip towards the north between
shot points 1280-1000. There is a distinct discordance between these two packages (Fig.
5.13). The most prominent lower reflector is here interpreted as a back thrust and has a similar
appearance to discordances imaged on the previous sections.
Assuming the discordances on line SG89 03V are tectonic, a possible interpretation is that the
back thrust rises in structural level from Lower Palaeozoic horizons, in the east, to
Carboniferous Limestone, in the west. The eastward plunge of the postulated thrust line on
section SG89 01V explains why the structure of the Rumney inlier further east is not thrusted.
Thrusting would be below the Silurian.
The lower package of reflectors beneath the thrust is seismically similar to reflectors of layer
C, though layer C on this section is less persistent. The only reflectors in the north are between
0-0.9s TWTT and represent the moderately northward dipping limb of the Cowbridge
Anticline (Fig. 5.14). The syncline imaged at the north end of the section is probably the
Caerphilly Syncline in a seismically-reflective Coal Measure sequence (Fig. 5.15).
There are a number of short discontinuous discordant reflectors beneath the Caerphilly
syncline which may represent the northward continuation of thrusting or the southward
continuation of the Moel Gilau Fault but it is unclear whether it is directly linked with
thrusting evident in the southern part of the section.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-22
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-23
5.6 SUMMARY OF STRATIGRAPHIC MODELS
Seismic reflection template:
Layer TWTT(s)
veneer 0-0.2
base of veneer - reflector A 0.2-0.4
reflector A - top layer B 0.4-0.45
layer B 0.45-0.9
layer C 0.9-1.55
base layer C - top layer D 1.55-1.75
layer D 1.75-2.5
Seismic refraction velocity template (Mechie & Brooks, 1984):
Layer Velocity kms-1
Mesozoic 3.4
Upper Carboniferous 4.8
Carboniferous Limestone 5.2
ORS 4.8
Lower Palaeozoic 5.5
Precambrian 6.0-6.2
Seismic correlation based on sections 5.4 & 5.5:
The veneer represents the Mesozoic; reflector A represents a horizon in Carboniferous
Limestone or the boundary between the Carboniferous Limestone and the Devonian; layer B
represents ORS; layer C represents Lower Palaeozoic; layer D represents a continuation of the
Lower Palaeozoic sequence or a layered Precambrian series or a thrust-repeat of layer C; sub-
layer D represents Precambrian crystalline basement.
Model 1 (reflector A within C. Lmst., U. Carb. preserved):
Layer Thickness (km)
Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous 0.7
Model 2 (reflector A within C. Lmst, no U.Carb. preserved):
Layer Thickness (km)
Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone 0.8
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-24
Model 3 (reflector A is boundary between C. Lmst. & ORS):
Layer Thickness (km)
Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone 0.7
ORS 1.1
Model 4 (layer D is Pc layered series):
Layer Thickness (km)
Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone 0.7
ORS 1.1
Lower Palaeozoic 1.8
Pc layered series 2.5
Model 5 (layer D is repeated layer C):
Layer Thickness (km)
Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone 0.7
ORS 1.1
Lower Palaeozoic 4.0
Model 6 (discordances between lower layer B and upper layer C and within layer C are
unconformities):
Layer Thickness (km)
Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone 0.7
ORS 1.1 (maximum)
Silurian 0.4
Pre-Silurian 3.5
Depth Model A (based on models 1-4):
Boundary Depth (km)
Base of Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone-ORS 1.0
ORS-Lower Palaeozoic 2.0-2.5
Lower Palaeozoic-Pc layered series 4.0
Pc layered series-Pc basement 6.5
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-25
Depth Model B (based on model 5):
Boundary Depth (km)
Base of Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone-ORS 1.0
ORS-Lower Palaeozoic 2.0-2.5
Lower Palaeozoic-Pc basement 6.5
Depth Model C (based on model 6):
Boundary Depth (km)
Base of Mesozoic 0.4
Carboniferous Limestone-ORS 1.0
ORS-Silurian unconformity 2.0
Silurian-Cambrian? unconformity 2.5
Lower Palaeozoic-Precambrian basement 6.5
unconformity
5.7 DISCUSSION ON THE STRUCTURE
The descriptions of the Vale seismic lines show that structural complexity is concentrated at
sub-Devonian levels. The Cowbridge Anticline at surface is associated at moderate depth
(1.5km) with a localised structural complexity and, at about 5km depth, with a possible
basement related antiform. It is possible that major thrusts involved in the structural
complexity repeat the supra-basement sequences described in section 5.6 (Fig. 5.16; eg
reflectors E, F) and that another major thrust deforms layer D below. Thrusts mapped in the
Vale of Glamorgan (BGS 1:50 000 series sheet 261/262 Bridgend), however, have decametre
scale displacements. Seismically imaged thrusts beneath the Cowbridge Anticline are
correlated with these exposed thrusts and are interpreted to be part of a Variscan imbricate
fan. The cumulative displacement is questionable.
The general structure of the Cowbridge Anticline is of a northward facing fold with a broad
crest 2 to 3km wide. The localised prominent discordant reflectors which either represent a
complex thrust-related fold or duplex occur immediately to the south of the axis of the
Cowbridge Anticline. The best analogies of duplexing of this type were discovered in the
Carboniferous Limestone near Rhossili and MCM of Gilfach Iago (Chapter 4, Figs 4.36 &
4.50). Mesoscale structure was used as an analogue for restoring the decametre-kilometre
width duplex beneath the Cowbridge Anticline to obtain an estimate of shortening and
associated uplift of the south crop.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-26
An estimate of uplift is justifiable in the case of the duplex being linked to thrusts further
north (Fig. 5.17) eg back-thrusting and antiformal stacking in Taff's Well Quarry (Fig. 5.18).
Antiformal stacking can cause back-thrusting at higher stratigraphic levels due to associated
underthrusting. Models of underthrusting have been applied to the Apennines of N Italy and
have been described by Vann et al (1986). Jones (1991) has applied Vann's model of
mountain front geometry to the structure beneath the Vale of Glamorgan so that the details of
the model are now in question and clearly can been analysed by two means: (1) structural
description of thrusting in the Vale of Glamorgan; and (2) direct examination of the seismic
sections.
There are clear problems in applying the above model of mountain front geometry to the Vale
structure:
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-27
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-28
1. The postulated mountain front structure appears to be restricted to the Vale even though the
passive-roof duplex geometry in the frontal structures of the Kirthar and Sulaiman mountains
in Pakistan is at least 70km long.
2. There is no direct evidence for major back thrusting at Carboniferous Limestone or
Devonian levels other than thrusts of mesoscale displacement.
3. There is no evidence for the along-strike occurrence of the major duplex beneath the Vale
predicted to be the cause of the uplift of the south crop. Rather, outcrops of Silurian strata
provide evidence for a simple stratigraphic contact with Devonian strata.
The problems above are investigated:
1. Why should such a model be accepted for the Vale when the main evidence for large-scale
back thrusting, underthrusting and stacking occurs in North Cornwall and Devon south of the
Rusey Fault? Furthermore, assuming a similar scale of mountain front structure to that
described by Banks & Warburton (1986) it would be expected that the duplex would extend
southwards into the Bristol Channel. In fact there is no evidence for a series of large scale
discordant reflector packages in either the Vale or the Inner Bristol Channel. Instead there is
evidence for singular thrusts of major length but uncertain displacement (Chapter 6).
However in argument for major structural shortening in the Vale would be that shortening
observed within the coalfield of about 40% should be related to a major structure in the
hinterland at depth. i.e. all the mesoscale structures observed in the OCCS are related to
thrusting in the Bristol Channel and the Vale, in the case of a linked system. As a general
estimate the South Wales coalfield of present width of about 30km would have been
shortened by 12km if a shortening of 40% is taken. Therefore the root structure to the south of
the coalfield beneath the Vale should possess a displacement of at least 12km. This is indirect
evidence for a major thrust beneath the Vale dramatically repeating a condensed sequence.
In contrast to a simple linked system would be a structural system involving basement
structures around which shortening was concentrated in the foreland to give anomalously high
values of shortening. If this argument is correct then the structure observed in the OCCS could
represent local strain and consequently overemphasise shortening estimates. It would then be
reasonable to assume a much smaller displacement on structures beneath the Vale. However
the structure observed in the OCCS usually contrasts with the structure of basement related
faults in SW Dyfed (Powell, 1987). The argument above is ill-founded.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-29
2. The surface geology and the seismic structure beneath the Vale of Glamorgan differ from
the model section of Jones (1991). It is not conclusive however whether a thrust-repeated sub-
Devonian sequence uplifted the south crop in a similar style to other mountain front models of
Vann et al (1986). The alternative is that the sub-Devonian sequence is not repeated and that
the small zone of complexity represents a locally-formed stack near the point at which the
associated thrust changes from a ramp to a flat, in which case the Cowbridge Anticline is a
ramp anticline of similar geometry to that described by Suppe (1983) and Jamison (1987)
above a thrust of limited displacement.
Figs. 5.20 a, b & c and Enclosure 5 consist of sections representing various models of the
structure beneath the Vale of Glamorgan (imbricate fan versus duplex; thrusts with small
displacements versus thrusts with large displacements). The displacement along the thrust
represented by reflector E may be about 10km (based on the correlation of layers C & D)
whereas if general shortening of the Carboniferous Limestone across the Cowbridge Anticline
is considered a minimum value of about 1-2km is obtained. This does not however take
account of small-scale back thrusting along the south crop, eg at Taff's Well.
3. Geological surveys were carried out in areas of the Vale of Glamorgan in which Lower
Palaeozoic strata crop out and also to the north-west of the coalfield in the Ordovician and
Silurian inliers of the Welsh Borderlands. The Lower Palaeozoic strata of the Welsh
Borderlands show a moderate dip probably due to movement along the Carreg Cennen Fault
and are a good structural standard for comparison with Lower Palaeozoic strata of the Vale.
The Silurian inlier in Cardiff, consisting of Ludlovian Rumney Grits, was examined to
observe the local nature of deformation in Lower Palaeozoic strata, in order to test the model
of major thrusting. Unlike the locally complex structure observed on the seismic sections, the
Rumney Grits merely show a regional dip due to Variscan folding. Associated bed-parallel
slip with slickenside lineations plunging down dip and minor faulting were also observed.
Two possible explanations for the absence of major structures at Siluro-Devonian levels in
Cardiff are:
(a) north-west trending faults such as the Variscan root-structures of the Cothelstone Fault
(Chapter 6) and the St. Mary's Well Bay Fault-Dinas Fault (Chapter 7), compartmentalise the
Variscan deformation of the Vale of Glamorgan from the offshore structure to the west and to
the east in the Bristol district. The north-west trending Variscan fault such as in Ruthin
Carboniferous Limestone Quarry is a good analogue of a north-west lateral or oblique ramp-
thrust subdividing the Variscan structure (Fig. 5.19).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-30
(b) The scale of duplexing beneath the Vale is too small to reach even the Cardiff district to
the east.
The shallower parts of the Vale reflection lines show prominent reflectors (including reflector
A) probably representing horizons within the Carboniferous Limestone or the boundary
between the Carboniferous Limestone and the ORS. The Penmark Syncline, in the south,
contrasts with the observed structure beneath the Bristol Channel which is a southward
dipping event described as limestone south of the Gower (Brooks et al, 1988). If the
southward dipping panel beneath the Inner Bristol Channel and the southern limb of the
Penmark Syncline are taken to represent limbs of the same structure, an anticline must trend
approximately along the coast of the Vale of Glamorgan. However the Vale and Bristol
Channel reflection lines are on opposite sides of the offshore continuation of the Cothelstone
Fault, rendering uncertain the correlation of the onshore and offshore events (Chapter 6).
It is possible, for example, that the structure of the Vale of Glamorgan cannot be correlated
with the structure beneath the Bristol Channel due to structural compartmentalisation.
Nevertheless field mapping in the Barry area reveals a major anticline close to the Vale coast
and therefore supports the above interpretation of the seismic data.
In summary the general structure of the Carboniferous Limestone is far simpler than the deep
structure.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-31
A.
B.
In the absence of a deep borehole the interpretation of the Vale reflection lines remains
uncertain. However various structural and stratigraphic models can be applied to the sections
and supported by analogy with the geology of surrounding areas, such as SW Dyfed, the
Welsh Borderlands and the Mendips.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-32
The main uncertainty of the geological interpretation is whether the seismic layered sequence
to reflection times of 2.5s is attributable to a thick stratigraphic sequence or to tectonic
duplication of a thinner sequence. A compromise must therefore be made between structural
and stratigraphic complexity, in line with the regional geology.
C.
The systematic description of the seismic sections clearly emphasises the occurrence of major
discordances at various levels. It is interesting to speculate whether these discordances
represent Variscan thrusts or unconformities associated with pre-Variscan tectonism. It is
equally possible that the high level angular discordances observed on line SG89-03V (Fig.
5.21) are due to Variscan thrusting or to regional sub-Devonian unconformities.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-33
In support of a thrust model, there is good surface evidence for thrusting such as in Ruthin
Quarry, Taff's Well Quarry and Trwyn y Witch, but only of decametre scale displacement. The
discordances (postulated to be regional unconformities) are difficult to trace across the
sections. Instead a sub-Devonian sequence about 4km in thickness is imaged. How can all the
discordances represent unconformities in a condensed sequence when there is 4km of layered
sequence? This is a crucial question in the interpretation of the sections since to assign a
stratigraphic identity to a particular discordance in a general case requiring a substantial
amount of thrust repetition is here considered inconsistent.
A thrust-repeated unconformable succession would seem an unreasonably complex
interpretation until the Mendips are examined in which Cambrian and unconformable Silurian
strata are involved in Variscan thrust-related folding. Furthermore examination of Lower
Palaeozoic strata in the Malvern Hills point to their association with Pre-Llandoverian
structure in addition to later Variscan deformation (Brooks, 1970).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-34
Thus on the basis of the regional structure to the east of the Bristol Channel Borderlands it is
not unlikely that a complex condensed stratigraphic template coexists with complex
Caledonian and Variscan structures to form the observed thickness of discordantly layered
sequence.
Against a thrust model, in addition to the scale of thrust displacement is that the depths to the
angular discordance occur in reasonable agreement with a depth to major sub-Devonian and
pre-Silurian unconformities predicted from the local thickness of Carboniferous Limestone,
Old Red Sandstone and Silurian. Conversely if a complete sequence such as that in SW Dyfed
occurs under the Vale there is no necessity for major thrusting or major unconformities.
However there are substantial palaeogeographic consequences of such a thick sequence
beneath the Vale (in particular to the south-east of the Carreg Cennen Disturbance). Evidence
from Lower Palaeozoic outcrop to the east, suggests that during the Early Palaeozoic the Vale
of Glamorgan would probably have been situated on a stable continental shelf. The Welsh
Basin on the other hand would probably have undergone fault controlled subsidence to
accommodate the thick sedimentary pile.
It is interesting to note that in either the thrust model or the complete sequence model, the
lower part of the seismic sequence may be interpreted as layered Precambrian, similar to
volcanic and volcaniclastic sequences of SW Dyfed. Also in SW Dyfed there are angular
discordances in upper levels of the section attributable to variations in the thickness of the
Devonian such as those which occur across the Benton Fault.
Further examination of Devonian strata in the Llanstephan area has shown that in addition to
Variscan tectonism (this study), Late Caledonian or Acadian deformation has affected the
region (Cope, 1979). However the seismic sections show no evidence for intra-Devonian
discordances and place any discordance below or at the base of the Devonian, based on local
thickness estimates. It is unclear as to whether Caledonian structures developed at depth to
the south of the Carreg-Cennen Disturbance. Evidence presented in Chapter 4 points to
Variscan reactivation of the Caledonoid fault and also to unrelated Variscan thrusting. This
suggests that any structural elements on the Vale reflection lines are of Variscan age. The
most likely explanation for the nature of the Vale reflection lines is that a thin Lower
Palaeozoic sequence similar to that of the Welsh Borderlands overlies a Precambrian
sequence similar to that of SW Dyfed, and these sequences are involved in Variscan thrusting
as observed, eg on Gower and in the Mendips. If there is a major repetition of the sub-
Devonian sequence beneath the Vale of Glamorgan, then associated major back thrusting and
uplift of the Carboniferous Limestone of the south crop are required as suggested by Jones
(1991).
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-35
However, if thrust displacements at depth are kept to a minimum, section balancing reveals
the greatest conformity in structural style vertically through the sections, so that Variscan
thrusting of substantially less than 1km may characterise the Vale of Glamorgan contrary to
previous models involving major thrusting.
5.8 UPPER PALAEOZOIC SUBCROP MAPS FOR THE VALE OF GLAMORGAN
AND THE INNER BRISTOL CHANNEL
Consideration of the sub-Mesozoic stratigraphy beneath the Vale of Glamorgan clearly sheds
light on the deep structure of the Bristol Channel. The occurrence of Lower Palaeozoic strata
at shallow depth points to the possible significant control of Caledonian and Variscan folding
in the preservation of offshore stratigraphy. However it is likely that Upper Carboniferous is
preserved offshore assuming that the South Scarweather package (Chapter 6) and the
reflectors on the Vale reflection lines are correctly interpreted stratigraphically. Different
possibilities are present to link the offshore geology of the Inner Bristol Channel with that of
the Vale of Glamorgan, namely, down warping due to a southward facing anticline,
extensional faulting and thrusting.
A south facing anticline may bring Carboniferous Limestone below its surface position in the
Vale of Glamorgan to a depth of 1.5km beneath the Bristol Channel, preserving a sequence of
Upper Carboniferous. Such a structure would be analogous to the structure immediately south
of Tusker Rock near Ogmore.
An extensional fault may downthrow the Carboniferous Limestone achieving the same result
as the former case.
Thrusting and folding may have uplifted pre-Mesozoic strata in the Bristol Channel so that
present reflectors represent pre- Carboniferous horizons, the overall structure being analogous
to that of the Mendips.
5.9 CONCLUSIONS
The Vale seismic lines reveal structural information from Precambrian basement level up to
Carboniferous.
Previous estimates of the thickness of the suprabasement Precambrian/Lower Palaeozoic
succession are questionable.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-36
Evidence has been found for a Variscan imbricate fan associated with the Cowbridge
Anticline. Small scale thrusting in the Vale of Glamorgan may continue at depth and probably
caused the uplift of the south crop. The structural model above is an alternative to the large
scale mountain front duplex of Jones (1991).
The inferred scale of displacement on the seismically imaged thrusts is dependant on the
stratigraphic model used in seismic interpretation.
Back thrusting along the south crop could be related to limited underthrusting, above a
basement structure, expected about 50km north of the major mountain front duplex of North
Cornwall.
Correlation with the seismic sequence in the Bristol Channel suggests the presence of Upper
Carboniferous strata beneath the Inner Bristol Channel.
Appendix 5.1
Appendix 5.2
GWBASIC and FORTRAN software used for depth conversion of seismic data from the Vale
of Glamorgan and the Bristol Channel.
program digit
c FORTRAN program to calculate
c the depth of reflectors from
c Vint and T2 data
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-37
real v(1:30)
real t(1:30)
real w(1:30)
real d(1:20, 1:50)
real s(1:30)
integer it2, ire
t(0)=0.
write(*,500)
print*,'A program to convert T.W.T.T. into real depths,',
& 'from Interval Velocities.'
c Input Section
write(*,500)
write(*,1000)
read(*,*)it2
write(*,500)
write(*,1500)
write(*,2000)
500 format (///)
1000 format ('Enter the number of T.W.T.T. values.'/)
1500 format ('Enter values of Interval Velocity and T.W.T.T.')
2000 format ('in ascending order.'/)
3000 format (10x,'Vint (km/s)', 12x,i,/10x,$)
3500 format (10x,'T.W.T.T. (s)',12x,i,/,10x,$)
6000 format ('True depths of intersection of the reflectors on,'
& 'the C.D.P. Axis are:')
7000 format (10x,'Reflector', 25x 'Depth (km)'/)
8000 format (12x, i3, 30x, f6.3)
8500 format ('Enter the number of reflectors which cross cut the,',
& 'C.D.P. Axis.'/)
9000 format (10x, 'Reflector ',12x,i,/)
do 10 ix=1, it2
write(*,3000) jx
read(*,*) v(jx)
write(*,3500) jx
read(*,*) t(jx)
continue
write(*,500)
write(*,8500)
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-38
read(*,*) ire
write(*,500)
do 20 ix=1,ire
write(*,9000) jx
write(*,3500)
read(*,*) w(jx)
print*
20 continue
c Calculation Section
do 30 ix=1,ire
do 40 jy=1,it2
if (w(jx).ge.t(jy) then
d(jx,jy)=((t(jy)-t(jy-1))/2.)*v(jv)
else
d(jx,jy)=((w(jx)-t(jy-1)/2.)*v(jy)
goto 30
endif
40 continue
30 continue
do 50 jx=1,ire
s(jx)=0.
50 continue
do 60 jx=1,ire
do 70 jy=1,it2
s(jx)=s(jx)+d(jx,jv)
70 continue
60 continue
c List Results Section
write(*,500)
write(*,6000)
write(*,500)
write(*,7000)
do 90 jx=1,ire
write (*,8000) jx,s(jx)
90 continue
write(*,500)
stop
end
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-39
REFERENCES
Allen, J.R.L., Bassett, M.G., Hancock, P.L., Walmsley, V.G. &
Williams, B.P.J., 1976. Stratigraphy and structure of the
Winsle Inlier, south-west Dyfed, Wales. Proceedings of
the Geologists' Association, 87(2), pp. 221-229.
Allen, J.R.L. & Williams, B.P.J., 1978. The sequence of the earlier
Lower Old Red Sandstone (Siluro-Devonian), north of
Milford Haven, south-west Dyfed (Wales). Geological
Journal, 13, pp. 113-136.
Anderson, J.G.C., 1971. The Cardiff District. Geologists'
Association Guides No.16. Edited by J.G. Capewell.
Anderton, R., Bridges, P.H., Leeder, M.R. & Sellwood, B.W,, 1979. A
Dynamic Stratigraphy of the British Isles. A study in
crustal Evolution. George Allen & Unwin, London.
Anstey, N.A., 1977. Seismic interpretation. Boston Mass.:
International Human Resources Development Corporation.
Baker, J.W., 1971. The Proterozoic history of southern Britain.
Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 82, pp.
249-266.
Baker, J.W., 1982. The Precambrian of south-west Dyfed. In:
Geological Excursions in Dyfed, south-west Wales, (ed.)
M.G. Bassett. Published for the Geologists' Association,
South Wales Group by the National Museum of Wales,
Cardiff.
Banks, C.J. & Warburton, J., 1986. 'Passive-roof' duplex geometry in
the frontal structures of the Kirthar and Sulaiman
mountain belts. Pakistan. Journal of Structural Geology,
Vol. 8, Nos. 3/4, pp. 229-237.
Bayerly, M. & Brooks, M., 1980. A seismic study of the deep
structure in South Wales using quarry blasts. Geophysical
Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 60, pp. 1-19.
Blake, J.F., 1884. On the Volcanic Group of St. David's. Quarterly
Journal of the Geological Society of London, Vol. 40, pp.
294-311.
Brooks, M., 1970. Pre-Llandovery tectonism and the Malvern
structure. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association,
Vol. 81, part 2, pp. 249-268.
Brooks, M., Trayner, P. M. & Trimble, T.J., 1988. Mesozoic
reactivation of Variscan thrusting in the Bristol Channel
area, UK. Journal of the Geological Society of London,
Vol. 145, pp. 439-444.
Brown, L.F. & Fisher, W.L., 1980. Seismic stratigraphic
interpretation and petroleum exploration. Tulsa, Okla.:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Cope, J.C.W., 1979. The early history of the southern margin of the
Twyi anticline, in the Carmarthen area, South Wales. In:
Harris, A.L., Holland, C.H., Leake, B.E. (eds.). The
Caledonides of the British Isles - reviewed. Geological
Society of London, Special Publication, 8, pp. 527-532.
Cope, J.C.W. & Rushton, A.W.A., (in press). Cambrian and early
Tremadoc rocks of the Llangynog Inlier, Dyfed, South
Wales. Geological Magazine, Vol. 129(6).
Cope, J.C.W. & Bevins, R.E., (in press). The stratigraphy and
setting of the Precambrian rocks of the Llangynog Inlier,
Dyfed, South Wales.
Crimes, T.P., 1970. A facies analysis of the Arenig of western
Lleyn, North Wales. Proceedings of the Geologists'
Association, 81, pp. 221-239.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-42
Dimberline, A.J., Bell, A. & Woodcock, N.H., 1990. A laminated
hemipelagic facies from the Wenlock and Ludlow of the
Welsh Basin. Journal of the Geological Society, London.
Vol. 147, pp. 693-701.
Dobrin & Savit, 1988. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting. 4th
Edition, Mc Graw-Hill: New York, London.
Dunne, W.M., 1983. Tectonic evolution of SW Wales during the Upper
Palaeozoic. Journal of the Geological Society of London,
Vol. 140, pp. 257-265.
Evans, D.C., 1906. The Ordovician rocks of western Caermarthenshire.
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 62,
pp. 597-643.
Fitch, A.A., 1976. Seismic reflection interpretation. Berlin:
Borntraeger.
Fitton, J.G. & Hughes, D.J., 1970. Volcanism and plate tectonics in
the British Ordovician. Earth Planetary Science Letters,
8, pp. 223-228.
George, T.N., 1970. South Wales (3rd Edition), British Regional
Geology, HMSO.
Green, J.F.N., 1908. The geological structure of the St. David's
area (Pembrokeshire). Quarterly Journal of the Geological
Society of London, 64, pp. 363-383.
Hicks, H., 1877. On the Pre-Cambrian (Dimetian and Pebidian) Rocks
of St. David's. Quarterly Journal of the Geological
Society of London, 33, pp. 229-241.
Hicks, H., 1884. On the Pre-Cambrian Rocks of Pembrokeshire, with
special reference to the St. David's District. With and
Appendix by Thomas Davies. Quarterly Journal of the
Geological Society of London, Vol. 40, pp. 507-560.
Hillier, B.V., 1992. Seismic studies of deep structure beneath the
South Wales Coalfield and adjacent areas. Unpublished PhD
Thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.
Jamison, W.R., 1987. Geometric analysis of fold development in
overthrust terranes. Journal of structural geology,
Vol.9, No. 2, pp. 207-219.
Jenyon, M.K. & Fitch, A.A. 1985. Seismic reflection interpretation.
2nd ed. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.
Jones, J.A., 1991. A mountain front model for the Variscan
deformation of the South Wales Coalfield. Journal of the
Geological Society of London, Vol. 148, Part 5, pp.
881-891.
Kleyn, A.H., 1982. Seismic reflection interpretation. London:
Applied Science.
Kokelaar, B.P., 1988. Tectonic controls of Ordovician arc and
marginal basin volcanism in Wales. Journal of the
Geological Society of London, Vol. 145, pp. 759-776.
McQuillin, R., Bacon, M. & Barclay, W., 1984. An introduction to
seismic interpretation: reflection seismics in petroleum
exploration 2nd ed. London: Graham & Trotman.
Mechie, J. & Brooks, M., 1984. A seismic study of deep geological
structure in the Bristol Channel area. Geophysical
Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 87, pp.
661-689.
Powell, C.M., 1987. Inversion tectonics in SW Dyfed. Proceedings of
the Geologists' Association, 98, pp. 193-203.
Richardson, J.B. & Rasul, S.M., 1990. Palynofacies in a Late
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-43
Silurian regressive sequence in the Welsh Borderland and
Wales. Journal of the Geological Society, Vol. 147, Part
4, pp. 675-686.
Sheriff, R.E., 1982. Exploration seismology. History, theory & data
acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strachan, A., Cantrill, T.C., Dixon, E.E.L., Thomas, H.H. & Jones,
O.T., 1914. The Geology of the South Wales Coalfield,
Part XI. The country around Haverfordwest. Memoir of the
Geological Survey of England and Wales.
Suppe, J., 1983. Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding.
American Journal of Science, Vol. 283, pp. 684-721.
Thorpe, R.S., 1972. Possible subduction origin for two Pre-Cambrian
calc-alkaline plutonic complexes from southern Britain.
Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 83, pp.
3663.
Traynor, J.J., 1988. The Arenig in South Wales: sedimentary and
volcanic processes during the initiation of a marginal
basin. Geological Journal, 23, pp. 275-292.
Tunbridge, I.P., 1980. The Yes Tor Member of the Hangman Sandstone
Group (North Devon). Proceedings of the Ussher Society,
Vol.5, pp.7-21.
Tunbridge, I.P., 1986. Mid-Devonian tectonics and sedimentation in
the Bristol Channel area. Journal of the Geological
Society, London, 143, pp. 107-116.
Vann, I.R., Graham, R.H. & Hayward, A.B., 1986. The structure of
mountain fronts. Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 8,
pp. 215-228.
Walmsley, V.G. & Bassett, M.G., 1976. Biostratigraphy and
correlation of the Coralliferous Group and Gray Sandstone
Group (Silurian) of Pembrokeshire, Wales. Proceedings of
the Geologists' Association, 87, pp. 191-220.
Waters, R.A. & Lawrence, D.J.D. 1987. The geology of the South Wales
Coalfield part 3: The Country around Cardiff, 3rd edn.
Memoirs of the British Geological Survey, Sheet 263
(England and Wales).
Williams, B.P.J., 1971. Sedimentary features of the Old Red
Sandstone and Lower Limestone Shales of south
Pembrokeshire, south of the Ritec Fault. pp. 222-239. In:
Bassett, D.A. & Bassett, M.G. (eds.), Geological
Excursions in South Wales and the Forest of Dean.
Geologists' Association, South Wales Group, Cardiff.
Williams, A., Strachan, I., Bassett, D.A., Dean, W.T., Ingham, J.K.,
Wright, A.D. & Whittington, H.B., 1972. A correlation of
Ordovician rocks in the British Isles. Geological Society
Special Report, no. 3.
Wilson, D., Davies, J.R., Fletcher, C.J.N. & Smith, M., 1990.
Geology of the South Wales Coalfield, Part VI, the
country around Bridgend. Memoir for 1:50,000 geological
sheet 261 and 262 (England and Wales). Second Edition,
London: HMSO.
Woodcock, N.H., 1984. Early Palaeozoic sedimentation and tectonics
in Wales. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 95,
pp.323-335.
Woodcock, N.H., 1990. Sequence stratigraphy of the Welsh Basin.
Journal of the Geological Society of London, 147, pp.
537-547.
Ziegler, A.M., McKerrow, W.S., Burne, R.V. & Baker, P.E., 1969.
Correlation and environmental setting of the Skomer
Volcanic Group, Pembrokeshire. Proceedings of the
Geologists' Association, 80, pp. 409-439.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-44
FIGURE CAPTIONS
Fig. 5.1 Location map for the Vale seismic reflection sections. Key: Sw Swansea, PT Port Talbot, Pcl Porthcawl, B
Bridgend, Cf Cardiff, Po Pontypridd, Mae Maesteg, GG Gilfach Goch, Cy Caerphilly, Ma Machen, Pe Pencoed, Ll
Llantrisant, Mi Miskin, W Wick, StA St Athan, Pk Penmark, StD St Donats, LlM Llantwit Major, Rh Rhoose, Og Ogmore.
Main roads: M4, A48. Section lines: 01V, 02V & 03V.
Fig. 5.2 Borehole data of Cambrian Exploration Ltd. Key: SB, Senghenydd Borehole; MB, Maesteg Borehole; orv,
Ordovician; S, Silurian; ORS, Old Red Sandstone; CL, Carboniferous Limestone. (Depths are in Metres).
Fig. 5.3 a. Geological section through SW Dyfed showing the depth to the major refracting boundary postulated to
represent the surface of the Precambrian crystalline basement (Mechie & Brooks, 1984). Key: JT, Johnston Thrust; numerical
values represent seismic refraction velocities in kms-1.
b. Field sketch looking westwards from near Ticklas at Precambrian crystalline basement overlying Silurian and
Westphalian rocks. The synoptic sketch schematically represents Precambrian rocks thrust over Palaeozoic rocks.
Fig. 5.4 a. General seismic structure beneath the eastern part of the Vale of Glamorgan.
b. Sub horizontal seismic reflectors on line SG89 02V occurring from 0s to 2.75s TWTT.
Fig. 5.5 a. Southern end of section SG89 02V showing a planar veneer extending to 0.2s TWTT above the folded,
prominent reflector (A). The extrapolation of Reflector A to surface is correlated with Carboniferous Limestone inliers of the
Vale of Glamorgan. Minor structures within reflector A probably represent folding and thrusting. The composite nature of
the reflector A 'horizon’ is evident.
b. Lithological contrasts in Carboniferous Limestone on Flat Holm in the Inner Bristol Channel.
Fig. 5.6 Indistinct base to the reflective package representing the Carboniferous Limestone of the South Crop on section
SG89 02V.
Fig. 5.7 a. Location map of sites containing reoriented structures analogous to those shown by reflector A.
b. An example of a reoriented thrust in Carboniferous Limestone of Rhossili on the Gower.
Fig. 5.8 The transparent zone, layer B, beneath reflector A probably representing Old Red Sandstone. The layered sequence
(layer C) below, probably represents Lower Palaeozoic strata. The boundary between B and C could represent the Devono-
Silurian boundary, as it crops out in the Cardiff District. Angular discordances occur in layer C in middle parts of section
SG89 02V. The figure also shows the composite, tripartite layering of layers C and D. A possible repeated sequence on
section SG89 02V.
CHAPTER FIVE
Tectonic Evolution of the Bristol Channel borderlands
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION, VALE OF GLAMORGAN Page 5-45
Fig. 5.9 Complex antiformally stacked thrust duplex or thrusted fold above a major change in thrust angle from the south
dipping reflector E to sub horizontal reflector F, on section SG89 02V. The figure shows the correlation of reflectors E and F
as a single thrust line of changing plunge. The prominent reflector beneath E may represent another thrust flat.
Fig. 5.10 Strike section SG89 03V revealing the structure of reflector A and package A, correlated with a horizon within the
Carboniferous Limestone or a horizon close to the Devono-Carboniferous boundary. Part of strike section SG89 03V shows
the truncation of Palaeozoic reflectors by the Mesozoic veneer at about 0.1s TWTT.
Fig. 5.11 The tripartite structure of layer C on section SG89 03V.
The discordance within layer C represents either a strike section through a thrust or an unconformity at middle levels of
section SG89 03V.
Fig. 5.12 The westward continuation of the Penmark Syncline is outlined by reflector A beneath the Mesozoic veneer of
section SG89 01V.
Fig. 5.13 A thin package of closely spaced reflectors intersect outcrop of Barry Harbour Limestone on section SG89 01V.
There is a clear discordance in reflectors beneath shot points 1230-1080. The discordant reflector packages possibly represent
bedding and a ramp thrust.
Fig. 5.14 North dipping limb of the Cowbridge Anticline on section SG89 01V.
Fig. 5.15 Seismically reflective Coal Measure sequence of the Caerphilly Syncline at the north end of section SG89 01V.
Fig. 5.16 A possible repetition of the suprabasement sequence by a thrust extended southwards from reflector E. Another
thrust deforms layer D in the footwall of the thrust above.
Fig. 5.17 A hypothetical linked thrust system incorporating the structure beneath the Cowbridge Anticline and the south crop
of the coalfield. Thrusting beneath the Vale could be related directly to the uplift of the south crop.
Fig. 5.18 An antiform folding thrusts (E) and other south and north verging thrusts (A-D) in Carboniferous Limestone of
Taff's Well quarry situated on the south crop of the coalfield north-west of Cardiff.
Fig. 5.19 North-west trending lateral Variscan fault in Carboniferous Limestone of Ruthin Quarry. A possible analogue of a
compartmentalising cross fault.
Fig. 5.20 a, b & c Structural sections based on the Vale reflection lines.
Fig. 5.21 Angular discordances on line SG89 03V representing either thrusts or sub-Devonian unconformities.
Marios Miliorizos 12th June 2006 File name: PhD Chapter 5 Five