tees valley pilot workshop 3 commissioning lisa williams, bond consortium member and independent...
TRANSCRIPT
Tees Valley Pilot Workshop 3 Commissioning
Lisa Williams, BOND Consortium member and Independent Consultant
• Commissioning is about ensuring the right people and services are in the right place at the right time for all children, young people and families. It is the overall process by which services are planned, investment decisions are made, delivery is ensured and effectiveness is reviewed. DfE
• Commissioning is simply the process used to decide how we spend available funds to achieve particular outcomes.
• Commissioning requires a number of separate but interlinked activities
Every Child Matters – Children’s Act 2004Joint Planning and Commissioning Framework for CYP and Maternity Services 2006
Patient/ public
Petitions
Published prospectus
Review service provision
Assessing needs
Seeking public and patient views
Managing performance (quality, performance, outcomes)
Referrals, individual needs assessment; advice on choices; treatment/ activity
Managing demand
Shaping the structure of supply
Designing services
Deciding priorities
National targets
Look at outcomes for children and young people Look at particular
groups of children and young people
Commission – including use of pooled resources
Identify resources and set priorities
Decide how to commission services efficiently
Monitor and review services and process
Develop needs assessment with user and staff views
Plan pattern of services and focus on prevention
Plan for workforce and market development
Phase 1Needs assessment and strategic
planning
Phase 2 Shaping and managing the
market
Phase 3Improving performance,
monitoring and evaluating
Identify needs
Outcomes?
Plan and design pattern of services
Look to the market - Does it provide what
we need?Tender & Procure
Disinvest?Develop market?
how well is the service delivering
outcomes?
What have we learnt
about needs?
Resources? Priorities?
Strategic process for allocating resources
• National and regional – low volume, specialist, complex
• Strategic local e.g. on the basis of the whole population needs
• Community or partnerships e.g. school clusters, local services etc
• Large organisation – sub-contracting• Individual schools (individual departments)• Personal budgets for individual cases/needs
• Outcomes focused – decisions• Evidence based - decisions• Transparent and fair – processes• Contestability – where appropriate to drive innovation
and select the best in-house or external provider• Challenge – to in-house and external practitioners• Value for money – of all services• Performance management – for all services
www.commissioningsupport.org.uk
Commissioning Principles may include…
Weak Commissioning
Historically and provider led
Little effective challenge
Adequate Commissioning (status quo)
Good control over existing contracts
Narrow approach to commissioning around procurement and purchasing
Effective Commissioning
Commissioners engaging with communities on the pattern of services required
Commissioners shaping structure of delivery
Active redesign of services
Personalisation
Decommissioning
Intelligent Commissioning
Maximise value from total local public sector budget
Outcome driven
Empowering users and local communities
Widespread embracing of behavioural change
Some community led commissioning
Semi-autonomous personalisation
Driven by customer experience
Aiming to be here….
Many organisations operate here
REACTIVE COMMISSIONING
• ‘Understand’– have you involved VCSOs? – VCS access to local knowledge – VCS access to ‘harder to reach’ groups
• ‘Plan’– do you know about existing VCSO services
and what they provide and to who?– What do you want the local ‘market’ to look
like? Gaps? Areas for strengthening?
• ‘Do’ – Can you help develop services through
procurement processes e.g. can small specialist services compete with large?
– Have you allowed time and support for VCSO tendering?
• ‘Review’– Have you specified appropriate service delivery
outcomes?– Are you acting on the information you have to take
remedial action where it is needed before critical?
• Better services - driven by feedback from people who use them
• Not wasting money – CYP know what works and what doesn’t
• Making services CYP friendly and accessible• Gaining expert insight about diverse needs and the
barriers faced by marginalised and vulnerable groups.• Improved accountability to CYP as stakeholders • Direct benefits to CYP themselves – including increased
knowledge of services, confidence, skills and networks
• Understand
– Are you clearly articulating unmet needs in an accessible and understandable format?
– Do you know what works (evidence)?
• Plan
– Do you provide clear, accessible and persuasive information on what your service does now?
– Can you articulate and evidence the outcomes you achieve?
• Do – Do you prioritise tendering – time, skills and activity?– Have you built relationships that matter to future
tendering?– Collaborate rather than compete?
• Review– Do you collect and analyse process and outcome
data and information?– Are you acting on the information you have to take
remedial action where it is needed before critical?
– Volunteer capacity (how cost effective is this?)
– Organisationally held knowledge and expertise
– Non-profit making – will this demonstrably make it cheaper than the competitor’s?
– Local brand (how strong is your brand? What is the perception locally?)
– Accessibility and less stigma - how do you demonstrate the benefit?
– Attract other funding – have you promoted your track record?
• Leaders who understand the agenda• Providers who are clear about what they
can deliver to whom, and the outcomes• Relationships based on knowledge and trust• The routine engagement of statutory
providers, commissioners, VCS and CYP, parents and carers
• VCS organisations which understand the commissioning world
BOND Learning from Practice. 2012, to be published
GETTING IN TOUCHWebsite: www.youngminds.org.uk/bond
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7089 5050