telemetry standards - electric reliability council of … · web viewincludes comments from 9/24...

25
DRAFT COPY FOR REVIEW USE ONLY Includes Comments from 9/ 17 24 ROS/ Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Standards Version 0.0 8 76 August 27September 24, 2007

Upload: tranthuan

Post on 26-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

DRAFT COPY FOR REVIEW USE ONLYIncludes Comments from 9/1724 ROS/Telemetry

Standards Workshop

Texas Nodal MarketTelemetry Standards

Version 0.0876August 27September 24, 2007

Page 2: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

Telemetry Standards

Telemetry Status and Analog Measurements Data

A. IntroductionERCOT TAC TAC is charged by the Nodal Protocol 3.10.7. 45 to create Telemetry Criteria. This Telemetry Criteria document specifies the Telemetry Criteria called for in the Nodal Protocols. TAC approves the Telemetry Criteria and an appropriate TAC subcommittee is required to update the Telemetry Criteria annually each October or more often on a periodic basis as deemed necessary.

Acquisition of good (VALID) telemetry status and analog measurements data (Telemetry) for of the transmission power system (System) together with an accurate power system model of the system are processed by a state State estimator Estimator to provide an optimal estimate of the System power system state at a given point in time while filtering measurement noise (error) and detecting gross errors. The quality and availability of telemetry provided to ERCOT are important to the performance of the ERCOT State Estimator and the LMP calculationsall ERCOT Real-time applications. As directed by the Nodal Protocols, these Telemetry Criteria are designed to ensure proper performance of the aforementioned applications.

Telemetry is not needed at every node of the System to arrive at a good estimate of the System’s state. There are general telemetry performance criterion, such that sufficient numbers and placement of measurements and accuracy of measurements that are available to achieve System observability and an overall good State Estimator performance.

Beyond general telemetry performance criterion there are more stringent criterion needed at locations where state estimates are “critically important” (e.g., locations where reliability, security, and Market impact are of more focused concern).

In case of a conflict between these Telemetry Criteria and the Nodal Operating guide and or the Nodal Protocols, the Nodal Protocols shall prevail.

Required Telemetry Telemetry of Voltage and Power Flow

Each TSP shall provide telemetered measurements on modeled Transmission Elements to ensure State Estimator observability of any

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Footnotes in these Telemetry Criteria are temporary. They summarize the changes in this version from the previously TAC-approved version.
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Request naming of document to specify "criteria" to match protocols Change made 09/18/07
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
add TAC to verbiage
Page 3: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

monitored voltage and power flow between their associated transmission breakers to the extent such can be shown to be needed in achieving the TAC-approved SE performance standard. On monitored non-Load substations, each TSP shall install, at the direction of ERCOT, sufficient telemetry such that there is an “N-1 Redundancy.” An N-1 Redundancy exists if the flow remains observable on the loss of any single measurement pair (MW, MVAr) excluding station RTU communication path failures. In making the determination to request additional telemetry, ERCOT shall consider the economic implications of inaccurate representation of Load Models in LMP results versus the cost to remedy.

QSEs, Resources and TDSPs are required to provide power operation data to ERCOT including, but not limited to:

(1) Real time generation data from QSEs; (2) Planned Outage information from Resources; (3) Network data used by any TDSP’s control center, including:

(a) Breaker and line switch status of all ERCOT Transmission Grid devices;

(b) Line flow MW and MVAR;(c) Breaker, switches connected to all Resources;(d) Transmission Facility Voltages; and (e) Transformer MW, MVAR and TAP.

(4) Real time generation and Load acting as a Resource meter data from QSEs;

(5) Real time Generation meter splitting signal from QSEs;(6) Planned Transmission Outage information from TDSP;(7) Network transmission data (model and constraints) from

TDSP; and(8) Dynamic Schedules from QSEs;

Real Time data will be provided to ERCOT at the same scan rate as the TDSP or QSE obtains the data from telemetry.

B. Requirements

B.1. Operations Requirements

R1. Telemetry of Breaker and Switch Status [NP: 3.10.7.5.1(1))]

Continuous Telemetry of the Status of Breakers and SwitchesEach TSP and QSE shall provide telemetry, as described in this subsection, to ERCOT on the status of all breakers and switches used to switch any Transmission Element or load modeled by ERCOT. Each TSP and QSE is

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Continue to site number in protocol
Page 4: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

not required to install telemetry on individual breakers and switches, where the telemetered status shown to ERCOT is current and free from ambiguous changes in state caused by the TSP or QSE switching operations and TSP or QSE personnel. Each TSP or QSE shall update the status of any breaker or switch through manual entries, if necessary, to communicate the actual current state of the device to ERCOT, except if the change in state is expected to return to the prior state within one minute. If in the sole opinion of ERCOT, the manual updates of the TSP or QSE have been unsuccessful in maintaining the accuracy required to support State Estimator performance to the State Estimator Performance Standard, ERCOT may request that the TSP or QSE install complete telemetry from the breaker or switch to the TSP or QSE, and then to ERCOT. If the TSP disputes the request for additional telemetry the TSP shall have the appeals process available under the section titled “ERCOT Requests for Telemetry”R14 or R15 as applicable. In making the determination to request installation of additional telemetry from a breaker or switch, ERCOT shall consider the economic and reliability implications of inaccurate representation of Model Loads in LMP resultsERCOT Real-time applications versus the cost to remedy.

General Telemetry Performance CriteriaThe following criterion will apply in general to Telemetry provided to ERCOT:

R2. Required TSP Telemetry [NP: 3.10.7.45.2(3)]1

Each TSP shall provide telemetered measurements on modeled Transmission Elements to ensure State Estimator observability of any monitored voltage and power flow between their associated transmission breakers needed in achieving the TAC-approved State Estimator performance standard. On monitored non-Load substations, each TSP shall install, at the direction of ERCOT, sufficient telemetry such that there is an “N-1 Redundancy.” An N-1 Redundancy exists if the flow remains observable on the loss of any single measurement pair (MW, MVAR) excluding station communication path failures.

TSPs are required to provide power operation data to ERCOT as defined in the ERCOT Nodal ICCP Communication HandbookNodal Operating Guide. ERCOT will monitor the validity of the Network Model as it affects State Estimator results in order to determine additional required data.

1 The requirements for TSP and QSE telemetry have been separated into their own sections. Data exchange requirement are now in the ICCP Handbook rather than being listed in the Telemetry Standards.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Page 5: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

(1) The TSP shall maintain the sum of flows into any telemetered bus less than the greater of 5 MW or 5% of the largest line rating at each bus.

(2) Each QSE or TDSP shall provide data to ERCOT that meets the following availability:

Ninety eight (98%) percent of all telemetry provided to ERCOT must achieve a quarterly availability of eighty (80%) percent. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data with good quality codes at the scheduled periodicity.

Non-TSP substation owners shall provide the required data to their interconnected TSP as defined byin accordance to new construction and redundancy requirements set forth in R14 and R15.TDSP’s shall make reasonable efforts to obtain this redata from retail customers associated with new customer-owned substations requirementsto meet this standard or obtain agreement from ERCOT that these retail customers have entered into arrangements with ERCOT to provide this data to ERCOT.  If the data cannot be obtained under either of these methods, ERCOT shall report such cases to the Wholesale Electric IndependentWholesale Electric Market Monitor (WEMM).

R3. Required QSE Telemetry [NP: 6.5.5.2(2)]Error: Reference source not found

QSEs are required to provide power operation data to ERCOT as defined in the ERCOT Nodal ICCP Communication HandbookProtocols. The data exchange tables in that document represent all potential data required.

R4. Telemetry Scan Rates [NP: 3.10.7.5(3)]2

ERCOT will scan QSE and TSP data at scan rates as defined in the ERCOT Nodal Operating GuideICCP Communication Handbook. The data exchange tables in that document specify the frequency of scan rates to be used within ERCOT. Data acquired through field telemetry shall be made available to ERCOT through the least number of intermediate systems possible. In no case shall field telemetered data be delayed beyond the specified scan rates due to a point’s propagation through one or more intermediate systems.

2 Scan rate requirements have been changed to reflect the actual data exchange requirements of the market.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
This comment as written is not achievable due to latency issues. The workshop group did not have a suggestion on the wording but acknowledge there is an issue with too much delay caused by daisy chaining the data from the field. The intent is the maximum delay from source to ERCOT should be established.
Page 6: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

R5. Data Quality3

Market Participant’s shall provide documentation to ERCOT describing their native system quality codes and defining the conversion of their quality codes into the ERCOT defined ICCP quality codes consistent with the ERCOT Nodal Operating GuideICCP Communication Handbook.

B.2. Maintenance Requirements

R6. Minimum Telemetry Criteria [NP: 3.10.7.5.2(5)]

The TSP or QSE shall assist ERCOT in maintaining the algebraic sum of the telemetered measurements around each Electricalsubstation buss such that they are less than 5% of the largest normal line rating or 5 MW, whichever is greater.

R7. Telemetry Availability4

All points made available to ERCOT must achieve a monthly calendar quarterly availability of ______ (__80%) percent. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data with VALID quality codes at the scheduled periodicity.

TA

ni

i iB11100

TB

Where:

A = average percent availability of all points received from a given QSE or TSP.

3 The Data Quality provision of the previous version of the Telemetry Standards addressed quality codes directly. Data quality is extensively treated in the ICCP Handbook, so this version of the Telemetry Standards refers to the ICCP Handbook.4 Availability requires have been changed from 98% of all points achieving 80% availability, to all points achieving 99% availability. The 99% availability is the total availability of all points, not the availability of each point.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
This is not formula for average availability. Would like to change from the 100% requirement in the formula. add factor of "n" to the "T" under the fornula - NxT= average availability. see above proposed change to equation.
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Is this ERCOT measured in ERCOT's system? If so, how do you account for issues w/in the ERCOT sys. Who is responsible for lost communication? ERCOT does not have enough info to determine if this assessment is fair. Recommendation to use existing verbiage rather than edits. Needs to include act-of-god, outage repair, etc. Need definition formalized for "valid" quality codes. 99% listed not accepted by group. Scheduled outages not referenced in verbiage. need calculations, penalties, etc to set up shadow systems.
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Insert agreed upon perentage
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Modify to Substation instead of Electrical
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
QSE does not have ability to do algebraic sum. Remove QSE reference. Private networks cannot obtain this info. Paragraph is paraphrased from protocol, which changed intent of verbiage. Change to verbatim language from protocol and for applicable area monitored. R6 should be done by ERCOT (where possible). Accountability discussion needed.
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
What is quality code? Should be referred to in guides not handbook. description of process used in quality codes would be helpful. Potentially could include the code translations from the ICCP handbook.
Page 7: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

T = total number of seconds in the monthquarter.

i = the ith point having a quality code other than VALID

n = total number of points having a quality code other than VALID

Bi = number of seconds during the monthquarter that the ith point had quality other than VALID.

*Exceptions to Telemetry Availability calculation inputs:

ERCOT declared emergency that can effect telemetry

ERCOT supplied communication problems

3 rd party communication problems

R8. Locally and Remotely Replaced Telemetry

In the event that ERCOT identifies an individual Valid telemetered value which it believes is incorrect, it shall notify the providing entity, and direct them to manually replace the erroneous data until the error is corrected.

ERCOT will not manually replace telemetry status or analogs from TSP’s or QSE’s unless the TSP or QSE notifies them that they are technically incapable of performing a manual replace function due to technical difficulties at their facility except in emergency situations as deemed by the ERCOT shift supervisor. In this event, ERCOT shall notify market participants thru the Event Notification System (ENS) until the technical difficulty is resolved.

Telemetry remotely replaced by TSP or QSE will be reported to the responsible entityowner. When requested by ERCOT, TSP and QSE shall provide ERCOT with a plan within 12 Business dDay for fixing remotely replaced telemetry.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Changed from "as soon as possible" to "within 1 day". Issues may not be able to be resolved within 1 day. subsequent "action plan" statement would cover this situation - submitting a plan to cover the situation - possibly refer
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Changed from "as soon as possible" to "within 1 day". Issues may not be able to be resolved within 1 day. subsequent "action plan" statement would cover this situation - submitting a plan to cover the situation - possibly refer
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Possibly "provide action-plan" as substitute for "fix". Action plan would require inclusion of resolution.
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Requested reword "ERCOT shall not" to something like "ERCOT will make every effort to contact the QSE", or add an exception statement for emergency situations.
Page 8: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

Exceptions to the General Telemetry Performance Criterion shall be made for data points not significant in the solution of the State Estimator or required for the reliable operation on the ERCOT Transmission System. Some examples of these are:

(a) Substation with no more than two transmission lines and less than 10 MW of load;

(b) Connection of Loads along a continuous, non-branching circuit that may be combined for telemetry purposes;

(c) Substations connected radially to the bulk transmission system.

R9. Critically Important Telemetry5

Critically Important Telemetry Performance CriterionERCOT will identify MW/MVAR Telemetry pairs, not exceeding 10% of the Transmission Elements in ERCOT, and voltage points that are “critically important” to reliability, system observability, support of State Estimator performance, or are of a commercial Market concern. ERCOT will identify MW/MVAR Telemetry pairs, not exceeding 10% of the Transmission Elements in ERCOT, critical measurements6 and 20 voltage points that are “critically important” to reliability, system observability, support of State Estimator performance, or are of a the commercial Market concern. This critically important telemetry will be considered “Critically Important Telemetry” in the context of this document. must meet more stringent criterion for accuracy and availability where specifically addressed. ERCOT will review and publish this list annually.

ERCOT will use the following criterion criteria to identify critically important Telemetry:

(1) Loss of a telemetry point that results in the inability of ERCOT to monitor loading on a transmission line operated at 345 kV or above.

(2) Loss of a telemetry point that results in the inability of ERCOT to monitor loading on a 345/138 kV autotransformer.

5 This requirement the number of voltage points to approximately 20... The previous version of the standard limited the number of voltage point to no more than 20.6 A critical measurement is a measurement which will leave a portion of the transmission network un-observable if unavailable.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
singular/plural
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
what is observability? What points impacted? How long will ERCOT give to resolve?
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Need justification for percentage
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
As defined in protocol 3.10.7.5.2 (1). Possibly remove the word "Critical", or specify "criticality" definition
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Possibly add criteria on how to define critical points. Also criteria for determining an alternative means to resolve.
Page 9: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

(3) Loss of a telemetry point that results in the inability of ERCOT to monitor the loading on transmission facilities designated as critically important to transmission reliability by ERCOT. A list of critical facilities will be published annually.

(4) Telemetry necessary to monitor transmission elements identified as causing 80% of congestion cost in the year for which the most recent data is available.

R10. (5) Telemetry necessary to monitor the 20 most voltage critical buses designated by ERCOT and approved by TAC each October.

R11.

R12. Availability for Critically Important Telemetry7

All critical points made available to ERCOT by each QSE or TSP must achieve a monthly availability of ___% percent or better. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data with VALID ICCP quality codes at the scheduled periodicity.All Critically Important Telemetry points made available to ERCOT must achieve a calendar quarterly availability of 90% percent. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data with VALID quality codes at the scheduled periodicity.

1

TB

Where:

A = average percent availability of all points received from a given QSE or TSP.

T = total number of seconds in the quarter.

i = the ith point having a quality code other than VALID

7 Availability of critical points has been changed from 95% of points having 98% availability to all points having 99.9% availability. The 99.9% availability is the total availability of all critical points, not the availability of each point

ERCOT, 09/24/07,
Is this ERCOT measured in ERCOT's system? If so, how do you account for issues w/in the ERCOT sys. Who is responsible for lost communication? ERCOT does not have enough info to determine if this assessment is fair. Recommendation to use existing verbiage rather than edits. Needs to include act-of-god, outage repair, etc. Need definition formalized for "valid" quality codes. 99% listed not accepted by group. Scheduled outages not referenced in verbiage. need calculations, penalties, etc to set up shadow systems.
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
determined to be unreasonable. TSPs prefer prior verbiage
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Leave these comments in and add bullet referring to protocol.
Page 10: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

n = total number of points having a quality code other than VALID

Bi = number of seconds during the quarter that the ith point had quality other than VALID.

Exceptions to Telemetry Availability calculation inputs:

ERCOT declared emergency that can effect telemetry

ERCOT supplied communication problems

3rd party communication problems

Each QSE or TDSP shall provide data to ERCOT that meets the following availability:

Ninety five (95%) percent of the critically important telemetry defined by ERCOT must achieve a quarterly availability of ninety (90%) percent. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data with valid or manual quality codes at the scheduled periodicity.

R13. Restoration of Failed Telemetry and repair of inaccurate telemetry

TDSP/QSE Telemetry RestorationTelemetered data shall be provided continuously at the scan rates specified herein. Lost data or signals, whether failed or in error, must be restored promptly by the provider of the telemetered data. It is recognized that some data may be more critical that than other data. ERCOT will inform the TDSPTSP or QSE if a data item is critical and needs to be repaired as quickly as possible. QSE and TDSPTSP repair procedures and records shall be made available to ERCOT upon request.

Before ERCOT requests review/re-calibration of a problem piece of equipment it shall discuss the problem with the provider to attempt to arrive at a consensus decision on the most appropriate action.

When ERCOT notifies a data provider of a data element which is providing telemetry data inconsistent with surrounding measurements, the provider shall, within 30 days, either a) Calibrate/repair the mis-behaving equipment b) Request an outage to schedule calibration/repair of the mis-behaving equipment c) Provide ERCOT with a plan to re-calibrate or repair the equipment in a reasonable time frame or d) Provide ERCOT with

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
determined to be unreasonable. TSPs prefer prior verbiage insert agreed upon percentage
cdillon, 09/27/07,
Additional discussion of this topic is needed. Issue discussed but no final determination or agreement.
Page 11: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

engineering analysis proving the data element is providing accuracy within its specifications. Before ERCOT requests review/re-calibration of a problem piece of equipment it shall discuss the problem with the provider to attempt to arrive at a consensus decision on the most appropriate action.

When ERCOT notifies a data provider of a data element which is providing telemetry data inconsistent with surrounding measurements, the provider shall, within 30 days, either

1) Calibrate/repair the malfunctioning equipment 2) Request an outage to schedule calibration/repair of the

malfunctioning equipment 3) Provide ERCOT with a plan to re-calibrate or repair the

equipment in a reasonable time frame or 4) Provide ERCOT with engineering analysis proving the data

element is providing accuracy within its specifications. Calibration, Quality Checking and Testing

R14. Calibration, Quality Checking and Testing

It is the responsibility of the owner either TSP or QSE to insure that calibration, testing and other routine maintenance of equipment is done on a timely basis , and that accuracy meets or exceeds that which is specified in this Appendixconsistent with Good Utility Practice, for both the overall system and for individual equipment where detailed herein.

Coordination of outages required for these activities with ERCOT is also the responsibility of the owner. Each TSP/QSE shall have a plan on file with ERCOT to assure accurate telemetry of data. If a TSP/QSE repeatedly fails other telemetry metrics defined in these guidesTelemetry Criteria, ERCOT may require a revision of this the planaccess to the preventative maintenance and calibration procedures and records.

R15. Reliability of ICCP links [NP:3.10.7.5(4)]8

ICCP LinksData Quality Codes

Market Participant’s shall provide documentation to ERCOT describing their native system quality codes and defining the conversion of their quality codes into the ERCOT defined quality codes.

Status & analogs telemetered to ERCOT will be identified with the following quality codes:

8 ICCP link availability has been changed to 99.9% from 85% to be consistent with the availability requirement for critical data.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
change to "an owner"
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
request to remove this verbiage (j. varnell) or provide basis for this statement/requirement
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
strike - owner covers this statement
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
data provider referenced in other locations. be consistent ("owner" preferred)
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
strike - duplicate below
Page 12: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

–         Valid – represents analog or status the TSP considers valid

–         Manual – represents a analog or status entered manually at the market participant (not received from the field electronically)

–         Suspect - Represents a analog or status in which the TSP is unsure of the validity

–         Invalid – Represents a analog or status which the market participant has identified as out of reasonability limits.

Com_fail – informs ERCOT that due to communications failure, the analog or status provided ERCOT is not current

Reliability of ICCP Links

ICCP links must achieve a monthly availability of ninety-eight (98%) percent, excluding approved planned outages. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data. A link will be considered as available when at least eighty-five (85%) percent of the data defined on that link is successfully transferred to ERCOT with a valid or manual quality code. This will include establishing a process to coordinate downtime for ICCP links and database maintenance.

ICCP links must achieve a monthly availability of ninety-eight (98%) percent, excluding approved planned outages. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data. A link will be considered as available when at least eighty-five (85%) percent of the data defined on that link is successfully transferred to ERCOT with a valid or manual quality code. This will include establishing a process to coordinate downtime for ICCP links and database maintenance.

Each TSP and QSE shall use fully redundant data communication links (ICCP or RTU) between its control center systems and ERCOT systems such that any single element of the communication system can fail and:

Page 13: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

(a) For server failures, complete information must be re-established within five minutes by automatic failover to alternate server(s); and

(b) For all other failures, complete information must continue to flow between the TSP’s, QSE’s, and ERCOT’s control centers with updates of all data continuing at a 30 second or less scan rate.

ICCP links must achieve a rolling 12 month availability of ____ (___%) percent, excluding approved planned outages. Availability will be measured based on end-to-end connectivity of the communications path and the passing of Real-Time data. This will include establishing a process to coordinate downtime for ICCP links and database maintenance.ERCOT Requests for TelemetryNew Construction

ERCOT Requests for Telemetry

R16. Requests for Additional Telemetry [3.10.7.5(6)]

ERCOT is required to protect monitor transmission assets operated at 60 kV or above from damage. To do this, ERCOT may request that additional MW, MVAR, and voltage telemetry be installed, while attempting to minimize adding equipment to as few locations as practicable.

ERCOT may request additional telemetry when it determines that network observability or the measurement redundancy is not adequate to produce acceptable state estimator results. In making the determination to request installation of additional telemetry from a breaker or switch, ERCOT shall consider the economic implications of inaccurate representation of Model Loads in LMP results versus the cost to remedy.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Need to define "planned outages". How will these be tracked?
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Please remove "approved".
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Please remove "approved".
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
insert rolling 12 month period statement needed. Insert agreed upon percentage
Page 14: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

Prior to making a request for additional telemetry, ERCOT will provide evidence supporting a congestion or reliability problem requiring additional observability and , define expected improvements in system observablity needed. If the request is for telemetry additions at more than one location, ERCOT will prioritize the requested additions.

Upon receipt of a request for additional telemetry, the TDSPTSP or QSE will have sixty (60) days to either:

(1) Accept ERCOT’s request for additional telemetry, provide the telemetry within 18 months and notify ERCOT of the implementation schedule;Accept ERCOT’s request for additional telemetry, and provide a schedule for itsthe telemetry within 18 months and notify ERCOT of the implementation schedulewithin __ months.;

(2) Provide an alternative proposal to ERCOT, for implementation within the next 18 __18 months, which meets the requirements described by ERCOT;

(3) Propose a normal topology change (change normal status of switch (es)) in the area which would eliminate the security violations which are ERCOT’s concern. (i.e. eliminates the possibility of flow through a networked element and turns the security problem into a planning problem which is un-affected by unit dispatch);

(4) If ERCOT rejects the alternate solution, the TSP or QSE may appeal the original request to TAC within 30 days. If, after receiving an appeal, TAC does not resolve the appeal within 65 days, the TSP or QSE may present its appeal to the ERCOT Board.

(5) Indicate that the requested telemetry point is at a location where the TDSPTSP or QSE does not have the authority to install the requested telemetry. For points on privately owned facilities connected to the ERCOT Transmission Grid, an attempt will be made to facilitate ERCOT's telemetry request; or

If the above options are not responded by the owner within the 60 days time limit, then ERCOT shall (6) Ffile a request with the PUCT requesting expedited action for an Order directing that the responsibility for reliability

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Insert agreed upon time frame
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Insert agreed upon time frame
Page 15: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

and protection of this specific element or elements of the transmission system be withdrawn from ERCOT and assigned to the requesting TDSPTSP. ERCOT will then immediately remove the elements from its Real Time Congestion Management system as monitored elements pending the PUCT decision.

If ERCOT has not received acknowledgement that a request has been received within thirty (30) days of its sending, ERCOT will contact the TDSPTSP or QSE for verification of receipt.

Nothing in this section shall limit the TDSP’s appeal process outlined in Nodal Protocol Section 3.10.7.4.

ERCOT Request for Redundant TelemetryRequests for Redundant Telemetry

ERCOT will maintain redundancy on measurements critical to transmission reliability of the ERCOT interconnection. ERCOT will identify and produce a list of telemetry points in the ERCOT system that is critical to the state estimator solution. This list will be published annually. ERCOT will use this list to identify telemetry points whose loss will result in:

(1) Inability of ERCOT to monitor loading on a transmission line operated at 345 kV or above.

(2) Inability of ERCOT to monitor loading on a 345/138 kV autotransformer.

(3) Inability of ERCOT to monitor loading on transmission facilities designated as critical to transmission reliability by ERCOT. A list of critical facilities will be published annually.

ERCOT may request additional MW, MVAR and voltage telemetry to make these measurements redundant. In this request, ERCOT will identify the critical points, and the contingency/overload condition and the unit dispatch which makes this a possible concern. If the request is for telemetry at multiple locations, ERCOT will prioritize the requested additions.

Upon receipt of a request for redundantadditional telemetry, a TDSPTSP or QSE has sixty (60) days to:

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Significant changes - needs full review. what is data needed for, who is using it? 3/6 month time limits are not reasonable as a solid requirement rather than guideline.
Page 16: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

(1) Provide ERCOT with a schedule of equipment installations within the next eighteen (18) months which will provide the proposed telemetry;

Provide ERCOT with a schedule of equipment installations within the next eighteen __ (18__) months which will provide the proposed telemetry;

(2) Propose an alternative solution which will serve the same purpose as the ERCOT identified telemetry additions with a proposed implementation within 18 months;Propose an alternative solution which will serve the same purpose as the ERCOT identified telemetry additions with a proposed implementation within 18 __ months;

(3) In cases where the request is based on the availability rate of an existing telemetry point, the TDSPTSP or QSE will provide a plan to improve the availability rate of the identified critical telemetry to an acceptable level, or provide documentation for why this cannot be accomplished;

(4) If ERCOT rejects the alternate solution, the TSP or QSE may appeal the original request to TAC within 30 days. If, after receiving an appeal, TAC does not resolve the appeal within 65 days, the TSP or QSE may present its appeal to the ERCOT Board.

(5) Identify and propose a schedule of equipment installations within the next 18 months which would, as a result, make the transmission element identified by ERCOT non-critical; or

(6) Indicate that the facility that telemetry is being requested is not owned or covered by an interconnect agreement that allows the requested party to install the additional telemetry.

If ERCOT does not have knowledge that a request has been received within thirty (30) days of its sending, ERCOT will contact the TDSPTSP or QSE for verification of receipt.

C. Compliance

Compliance to the requirements o these Telemetry Criteria shall be governed by the PUCT-approved ERCOT compliance Process.

ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Insert agreed upon time frame
ERCOT, 09/20/07,
Insert agreed upon time frame.
Page 17: Telemetry Standards - Electric Reliability Council of … · Web viewIncludes Comments from 9/24 ROS/Telemetry Standards Workshop Texas Nodal Market Telemetry Criteria Version 0.08

Nothing in this section shall limit the TDSP’s appeal process outlined in Nodal Protocol Section 3.10.7.4.