telephone talk: effects of vocabulary and timing on telephone conversations using synthesized speech...
TRANSCRIPT
Telephone Talk: Effects of Vocabulary and Timingon Telephone Conversations Using Synthesized Speech
Elizabeth K. Hanson, Ph.D., CCC-SLPUniversity of South Dakota
Vermillion, SD
Caroline Sundheimer, M.A., CFY-SLPSunshine Speech-Language Therapy Services
Phoenix, AZ
ISAAC - Montréal, Québec, Canada - 2008
Acknowledgements
Tina Lombardi
Richardson Independent School District
Dallas, TX
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Hello?
Hello! Is anybody there?
Problems using SGD to talk on the phone Limited telephone bandwidth decreases
intelligibility (Milchard & Cullington (2004) )
Synthesized voice intelligibility worse over the telephone than sound field (Drager, Hustad, and Gable, 2004)
Timing issues… Results:
Hang up Rudeness Unsuccessful call
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Hello?
Hello! Is anybody there?
“The telephone is perhaps my greatest source of frustration.”
Colin Portnuff, 2007
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Attitudes Studies Japan study Content of initial message
(e.g., caller can’t speak and is using synthesized speech)
Timing of message delivery (e.g., 3 sec. delay)
Results: Initial explanation at start improved attitudes toward
caller Presence or absence of delay - no effect
Nakamura, Arima, Sakamoto, & Toyota (1993)
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Attitudes Studies Japan/Wisconsin study Content of initial message
(e.g., brief introduction and request for info)
Results (comparing locations): More positive attitudes in Wisconsin Fewer hang-ups in Wisconsin Explanatory message decreased # hang-
ups in JapanNakamura, Vanderheiden, & Smith (1993)
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Strategic Competence
Using a “floorholder” message
Person using SGD starts with an explanatory message to hold the conversational floor
Cues communication partner to wait
Bedrosian, et al. (2003)
Light (1989b, 1989)
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Purpose
Investigate impact of strategic message and delay times when using synthesized speech during telephone calls.
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Methods
100 telephone calls to businesses advertising in Yellow Pages
Randomly selected Asked for business hours Calls made during the day, to avoid
contacting minors Calls audiotaped for review & reliability
USD IRB#100-07-002-Telephone Talk: Effects of Strategic Communication Messages Using Synthesized Speech
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Technology
Telephone: Uniden landline telephone - speaker mode LG cellular telephone - speaker mode
“MT4” SGD by DynaVox Systems, LLC Voice: DECtalk®“Betty” Speech rate: “30” Volume: “70”
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Conditions
Explanation, no delay “Please wait, I’m using a computer to talk. What are
your hours? …” No explanation, no delay
“What are your hours? …” Explanation, delay
3-second delay “Please wait, I’m using a computer to talk…”
No explanation, delay 3-second delay “What are your hours?”
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Dependent Variable
Successful call = obtained business hours
Unsuccessful call = did not obtain business hours
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Results
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Exp+No Delay Exp+Delay No Exp+NoDelay
No Exp+Delay
# Calls
Success
Unsuccessful
Telephone Call Success by Condition
Results
Outcomes by Condition
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Exp+No Delay Exp+Delay NoExp+NoDelay
NoExp+Delay
Conditions
# Calls
Unsuccessful (hang-up immed.)
Unsuccessful (hang-up mid-way)
Unsuccessful (hostile/wronginfo)Unsuccessful(unintelligible/incomplete)Successful
Results
Unsuccessful Hang-Up Calls
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Exp+No Delay Exp+Delay NoExp+NoDelay NoExp+Delay
# Calls
Hang-up immediatelyHang-up mid-way
Discussion
Absence of explanatory message and or delayed start hurts success rate
Starting call immediately enhances chance of success
Starting with explanatory message enhances chance of success
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Clinical Implications
Teach strategic use of floorholder
Timing issue difficult to control Effect of hostility and hang-ups
on motivation to use telephone
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Limitations
Different phones Different regions DECtalk® still used
but not current
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Content of floorholder… Informative Instructional Personalized
Stakeholder involvement Modify SGD technology?
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
Future
Bedrosian, J.L., Hoag, L.A., & McCoy, K.F. (2003). Relevance and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 800-817.
Drager, K.D.R., Hustad, K.C., & Gable, K.L. (2004). Telephone communication: Synthetic and dysarthric speech intelligibility and listener preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(2), 103-112.
Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 54(2), 66-82.
Light, J. (1989b). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(2), 137-144.
Milchard, A. J., & Cullington, H. E. (2004). An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency of bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 356-362.
Nakamura, K., Arima, M., Sakamoto, A., & Toyota, R. (1993). Telephoning with a voice output device: Listener reactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 251-258.
Nakamura, K., Vanderheiden, G.C., & Smith, R.O. (1993). Attitudes and impressions toward receiving phone calls made with a voice output device in the United States and Japan. Technology and Disability, 2(2), 71-80.
Portnuff, C. (2007). AAC: A user’s perspective. Webcast. Retrieved July 3, 2007 from http://www.aac-rerc.com/pages/news/Portnuff_webcast.htm
Poster #12 ISAAC * 2008 * Montréal 07 Aug 2008, 10:10-11:00 a.m.
References
Results
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
m f m f m f m f
Exp+No Delay Exp+Delay NoExp+No Delay NoExp+Delay
Gender Comparison:Successful Calls
Results
What was different? * Exp NoDelay Vs Exp Delayed Delay Exp NoDelay Vs NoExp NoDelay Explanation * Exp NoDelay Vs NoExp Delayed Explanation & Delay Exp Delayed Vs NoExp NoDelay Explanation & Delay Exp Delayed Vs NoExp Delayed Explanation * NoExp NoDelay Vs NoExp Delayed Delay