telestroke and teleneurology - aupnstroke neurology evaluation by telemedicine: initial hospital...

31
Telestroke and Teleneurology Lawrence R. Wechsler, M.D. Chairman, Department of Neurology Vice President, Telemedicine University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Telestroke and Teleneurology

    Lawrence R. Wechsler, M.D.

    Chairman, Department of Neurology Vice President, Telemedicine

    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

  • Outline

    Telestroke Teleneurology Challenges Compensation

  • Estimated Demand for Neurology 2025

    Dall et al. Neurology 2013

  • Demand for Vascular Neurology

    Number of new strokes per year in US 795,000

    Number of vascular neurologists 1100

    Primary stroke centers 1092

    Comprehensive stroke centers 110

    Stroke Fellowship programs (2016) 74

    Stroke fellowship positions 123

    % Fellowship positions unfilled 34%

    Culebras A. Neurology Today 2015

  • Teleneurology

    IP over Internet Remote control of PTZ camera – Hx, PE

    History, exam, recommendations, documentation

    Imaging

    Consult

  • Teleneurology Anywhere

  • International Teleneurology

  • Advantages of Teleneurology

    Direct history by neurological provider

    Observe critical elements of examination

    Order specific tests – done locally Review results Speak directly to patient regarding

    assessment and plan Team based care

  • Why Teleneurology in an Academic Dept?

    Better care for patients Protect referral relationships Endovascular transfers Income for faculty Alternative work models Research potential Clinical trials

  • Components of Teleneurology Program

    Bidirectional real time video and audio

    Protocols / order sets In service training Stroke/neurology team Community education EMS awareness

  • Reliability of Telestroke Exam - NIHSS

    Craig J Telemed Telecare

    1999

    Shafqat Stroke 1999

    Meyer Neurology

    2005

    Anderson JSCVD 2011

    Wang Stroke 2003

    Handschu Stroke 2003

    Lamonte JSCVD 2004

    Pts 17 20 25 20 20 41 2 actor pts / 12 scenarios

    Setting General Neuro exam Non-acute

    stroke Non-acute

    stroke Non-acute

    stroke Acute stroke

    Acute stroke Ambulance

    Comparison ISDN v. bedside ISDN v. bedside

    Web based v. bedside

    iPhone 4 v. bedside

    Web based v. bedside

    Web based v. bedside

    Ambulance v. NIHSS training

    Result Kappa r=.21-1.00 Kappa r=.97

    Kappa r=.94

    Corr coef r=.98

    Pearson r=.95

    Kappa r=.85-.92

    Kappa r >.5

  • Teleneurology Examination - Limitations

    Visual fields Strength gradation Tone / rigidity Sensory examination Reflexes Stethoscope Ophthalmoscope

  • Teleneurology – IT and technology

    Purchased services REACH InTouch $$$

    Self supported Vidyo Polycom 24/7 coverage Response time $

  • Why Telestroke?

    Only 2-8% of stroke patients receive IV tPA

    Many hospitals don’t have stroke protocols and have never treated a patient with tPA

    64% of hospitals in US did not give IV tPA *

    Lack of available stroke specialist in rural hospitals major impediment to emergent treatment

    * Kleindorfer et al Stroke 2009

  • UPMC Telestroke

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    ME PS WS SM MK JR MV BV NW HR JM AR EA CR WM LT UN MG BD FR

    Consults - 3525 tPA -1078

    • 23 hospitals – 12 UPMC, 11 non-UPMC • tPA treatment rate: 31% • Transfers: 24% • 6 hospitals teleneurology coverage

  • Telestroke Before and After: All UPMC Hospitals

    2.9%

    5.5%5.4%

    7.2%

    0.0%

    1.0%

    2.0%

    3.0%

    4.0%

    5.0%

    6.0%

    7.0%

    8.0%

    % strokes Rx with tPA % strokes within 3 hrs

    Before

    After

    1235 Pts Before 2175 Pts After

  • Telestroke v. SC Patients Treated with IV tPA 90 day Outcomes

    90-Day Clinical Outcomes

    8.9

    17.1

    14.3

    21.1

    14.3

    4

    8.9

    11.8

    14.3

    7.9

    8.9

    6.6

    30.4

    31.6

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

    STROKE CENTER(N=56)

    TELESTROKE (N=76)

    90 Day Modified Rankin Scores

    mRS 0 mRS 1 mRS 2 mRS 3 mRS 4 mRS 5 mRS 6

    Zaidi et al. Stroke 2011

  • Telestroke: Post tPA care tPA Treated Pts – Hub v. Spoke

    Hub Drip and ship Drip and stay P value

    Patients 272 73 134

    Median NIHSS 11 11 8 >0.001

    Mean age 72 71 76 0.008

    Onset to needle 156 min 134 148 min 0.072

    Door to needle 72 min 75 77 min 0.151

    Sx ICH 5% 7% 2% 0.79

    LVO 36% 33% 12% >0.001

    LOS (days) 6.2 4,6 7.2 0.56

    Pneumonia 14% 10% 8% 0.077

    Intubation 19% 19% 2% >0.001

    In-hosp death 11% 11% 10% 0.859

    Heffner et al. Stroke 2015

  • Reorganization of System Stroke Care

    Stroke neurology evaluation by telemedicine: Initial hospital evaluation 2 day follow-up Hospital pre-discharge visit Outpatient follow-up

    Outcomes to be monitored Mortality Readmissions LOS Patient Transfers

    19

  • Telestroke Workflow

    Portal for calls from originating site Receiving calls and response time Time of onset, stroke severity, tPA exclusions Telephone discussion and triage Activation of video Confirmation of history NIHSS exam Consent tPA orders Transfer decision CTA

  • Teleneurology

    Stroke TIA Seizures Confusion Dizziness

    General Neurology

    Follow-ups

    Inpatient Daily

    rounds Acute Care

    Stroke

  • Teleneurology Issues EMR access Immediate v. scheduled Imaging review Documentation Guidelines for acute stroke calls Telepresenter Follow-up: new v. same problem Communication with originating

    team Transfer agreements

    (stroke, non-stroke)

  • Staffing Models

    On call physician Dedicated physician Stroke v. general neuro Triage by fellow/NP Call center Urgent v. Non urgent Backup and surge coverage

  • Imaging Access

    Direct spoke PACS signin Push imaging studies to central

    hub PACS Push imaging to teleneurology

    software 3rd party cloud based imaging

    solutions

    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=nuro+surgery&view=detailv2&&id=2014701C9BEE3BE4A2738B2C9E6D573AFE865B2D&selectedIndex=97&ccid=bC4Muifm&simid=608011754808017629&thid=OIP.M6c2e0cba27e6b40f9484fd56f42d6afeo0

  • Reimbursement for Teleneurology

    E&M codes with GT modifier

    Most require real time video conferencing

    Medicare – rural areas only Medicaid – state mandates

    with variable definitions National insurers - limited Other private insurers 32 states with parity laws

    States with Parity Laws

  • Billing Models

    Flat monthly fee – unlimited consults

    Tokens Monthly fee plus per case fee Tiered charges based on ED

    volume Who pays for equipment and

    software Hub hospital support

  • Compensation

    Physician Salary Per case fee Coverage fee per day,

    per night or per shift Combinations

  • Reporting: Process Measures 849 tPA Treatments

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

    Sx Hem

    OTT < 90 Min

    OTT < 2 Hrs

    DTN < 60 Min

    Door to Rx

    Onset to Rx

    Mean NIHSS 12

    140 min

    77 min

    37%

    11%

    4%

    62% (2015)

  • Reporting: 90 Day Outcomes 711 tPA Treatments

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Sx Hem

    Asx Hem

    mRS 0-2

    mRS 0-1

    Mean NIHSS

    UPMC NINDS (benchmark)

    11 14

    39% 39%

    47% 48%

    6% 5%

    4% 6%

  • ROI of Teleneurology: Hub and Spoke

    Hub Hospital Spoke Hospital Societal

    + Neurology transfers + Avoid transfers + Improved outcomes: tPA

    + Endovascular and surgery + No EMS bypass + Reduced disability

    - Network support + High quality patient care + Return to work

    - Neurology support - Greater cost of care + Less caregiver burden

    - IT costs - Quality monitoring - Higher upfront costs

  • Summary Telestroke and teleneurology

    bring expertise to areas without stroke and neurology coverage

    Network models vary and several technologies available

    Staffing and compensation are challenging issues

    Insurance reimbursement limited

    Telemedicine now routine component of systems of care

    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=telemedicine+challenges+&view=detailv2&&id=25AF58734E65B857C85479267466D483CA841CC2&selectedIndex=32&ccid=8ciCIV77&simid=608005655959111334&thid=OIP.Mf1c882215efbac1f5e3ac0e7d208f9c4o0

    Telestroke and Teleneurology��Lawrence R. Wechsler, M.D.�Chairman, Department of Neurology�Vice President, Telemedicine�University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterOutlineEstimated Demand for Neurology 2025Demand for Vascular NeurologyTeleneurologyTeleneurology AnywhereInternational TeleneurologyAdvantages of TeleneurologyWhy Teleneurology in an Academic Dept?Components of Teleneurology ProgramReliability of Telestroke Exam - NIHSSTeleneurology Examination - LimitationsTeleneurology – IT and technologyWhy Telestroke?UPMC TelestrokeTelestroke Before and After:� All UPMC HospitalsTelestroke v. SC Patients Treated with IV tPA �90 day OutcomesTelestroke: Post tPA care�tPA Treated Pts – Hub v. SpokeReorganization of System Stroke CareTelestroke WorkflowTeleneurologyTeleneurology IssuesStaffing ModelsImaging AccessReimbursement for TeleneurologyBilling ModelsCompensationReporting: Process Measures�849 tPA TreatmentsReporting: 90 Day Outcomes�711 tPA TreatmentsROI of Teleneurology: Hub and SpokeSummary