test of filter media according to en 1822 of filter media according to en 1822 thomas krinke &...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
TSI Particle Seminars 2008
Test of filter media according to EN 1822Thomas Krinke & Hans-Georg Horn
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
2
Outline
• Filtration – Basics• EN 1822 – Short Overview• Solution for EN 1822 conform characterization
of filter media
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
Efficiency, E = 1 - P
Penetration, P = Downstream ConcentrationUpstream Concentration
Mechanical Media: 100 nm < MPPS < 300 nmElectro-Static and Membrane: MPPS < 100 nm
Filter Testing – Introduction
Most Penetrating Particle Size, MPPS: Typically between 0.05 and 0.3 µm
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
4
Filtration MechanismsAction of Brownian motion. Best capture with small particles, fine fibers and low velocities. Independent of particle density.
Particles travel along streamlines and are caught because of their size. Ratio of particle to fiber size is important.
Particles deviate from the streamlines due to inertia and impact on the fibers. Large particles, high density, high velocity and small fibers is most efficient.
Particle is attracted to the fiber by electrical forces.
Diffusion
Interception
InertialImpaction
ElectrostaticDeposition
Inertial Impaction
Brownian DiffusionInterception
FilterFiber
(-)(+)
Electrostatic Attraction
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
5
Filter Efficiency Curve
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.01 0.1 1Particle Diameter [µm]
Effic
ienc
y
DIFFUSION
DIFFUSIONAND
INTERCEPTION
INTERCEPTIONAND
INERTIALIMPACTION
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
6
Filter Penetration
0.1 1 100.01
Particle Diameter (µm)
% P
enet
ratio
n
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Diffusion
Diffusionand
Interception
Inertial Impactionand
Interception
Most Penetrating Particle Size (MPPS)
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
7
Effect of Particle Deposition Mechanisms and Flow Rate (Face Velocity) on Penetration and Most Penetrating Particle Size
Penetration versus Particle Size
PARTICLE SIZE - log scale
PEN
ETR
ATI
ON Diffusion Interception
ImpactionMPPS
lower velocity
MPPS
Decrease of face velocity
Leads toIncrease of MPPSDecrease of Penetration
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
8
Filter Testing Standard EN 1822
• EN 1822 is the European test standard for HEPA & ULPA filters
• Certifies a filter's absolute minimum efficiency for all particles.
• Primarily used to certify air filters for clean room applications.
• The two-part EN 1822 test identifies the MPPS and challenges the filter with only these particles, creating an absolutely worst-case scenario (Schroth and Caesar 2001).
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
9
Filter Testing Standard EN 1822
• European Standard EN 1822 – 5 parts– 1822-1 Classification, performance testing, marking– 1822-2 Aerosol production, measuring equipment,
particle counting statistics– 1822-3 Testing flat sheet filter media (Standard for
3160)– 1822-4 Determining leakage of filter element (Scan
method, TSI components can be used)– 1822-5 Determining the efficiency of filter element
(TSI components can be used)
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
10
Classification by En 1822 – 1HEPA & ULPA Filters
High Efficiency Particle Air Filter
Ultra Low Penetration Air Filter
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
11
Example for Decrease of Number Concentration
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E+00
1.0E+01
1.0E+02
1.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.0E+07
H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 U15 U16 U17Filter Type
Con
cent
ratio
n on
Cle
an G
as S
ide
[#/c
cm] 1.0E7 Particle/ccm on raw gas side
1.0E5 Particle/ccm on raw gas side
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
12
Filter Testing Standard EN 1822
The test has two steps:1. Determine the MPPS of the filter medium
considering the mean face velocity of the medium when pleated into the filter (EN 1822 part 3)
2. Test the filter element at its MPPS by filter scanning (EN 1822 part 4) for leak detection and integral (overall) filter efficiency measurement.For complex filter geometries where scanning is not appropriate, filter elements may be tested in a closed test duct (EN 1822 part 5). In this case, only the integral efficiency is measured.
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
13
1822-3 Testing flat sheet filter media
• Filter manufacturers expect that media manufacturers supply a test certificate with the MPPS.
• Many filter customers expect 100% testing of product by the filter manufacturer.
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
14
1822-3 Testing flat sheet filter media
• EN 1822 allows two approaches:1.Monodisperse test aerosol and CPC(s)
2.Polydisperse test aerosol and OPC
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
15
1822-3 Testing flat sheet filter media
With monodisperse test aerosol and CPC(s)
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
16
Atomizer with0.03% DEHS in Isopropanol1.6L/min
3080L with Neutralizer 3077, 5L/min Sheath Air
Neutralizer 3012
50 nm
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
17
Atomizer with0.03% DEHS in Isopropanol1.6L/min
3080L with Neutralizer 3077, 5L/min Sheath Air
Neutralizer 3012
100 nm
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
18
Atomizer with0.03% DEHS in Isopropanol1.6L/min
3080L with Neutralizer 3077, 5L/min Sheath Air
Neutralizer 3012
150 nm
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
19
Creating Penetration Curvewith Monodisperse Aerosol
Particle Diameter
Pene
trat
ion
d n/d
logd
p
logdp
Particle Diameter
Pene
trat
ion
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
20
1822-3 Testing flat sheet filter media
With polydisperse test aerosol and OPC
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
21
Disadvantages of OPCs for Determination of MMPS
• Comparatively poor size resolution (high resolution needed)
• No channels below 200 nm• Some filter media (e.g. electrostatic) can have
MMPS of below 50nm
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
22
Monodisperse test aerosol and CPC(s)for determination of MPPS
• Biggest advantage:Excellent coverage of the possible size range for the MPPS.
• Disadvantage: More time needed to carry out test
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
23
Instrument SolutionModel 3160 Fractional Efficiency Filter Tester
• Fully automated test solution, ideally suited for filter media development (R&D)– Can be used for a wide variety of media,
including very high efficiency media – Up to 99.999999% efficient– Fully automated to save test time– Components are industry standards
• Classifier with DMA• CPC detection
– Does NOT provide information about loading behavior
• For filter media tests (EN1822 part 3), – TSI model 3160 is fully compliant
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
24
Model 3160 Flow Schematic
Rotometer
Diluter
Computer
PumpFilter
Filter
Filter
Filter Holder
Filter Flowmeter
Clean Air Supply
Upstream CPC
Downstream CPC
∆ P
Mixing Manifold
PumpFilter
Quick Test System
DilutionBridge
Neutralizer
Electrostatic Classifier
Pump
Bleed Flow System
Filter
Drier
Salt Atomizers
Oil Atomizers
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
25
Instrument Solution (2)
• Provides key information about filter media performance, including:– Fractional filter efficiency– Determine most penetrating
particle size (MPPS)• Full featured graphical and
tabular outputs
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
27
Applications
• Filter media development and characterization• Relevant for any company manufacturing high
efficiency filter media– Many new particle air filters are being developed – New types of filter media is being developed to
build new filters– It’s important to know the characteristics of the
media
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
28
3160 Operation and Setup Tips
• If downstream counts are <100 for some particle sizes consider lengthening sample time
• Monitor concentration periodically to detect problems with atomizers
• If penetration goes up again after (larger sizes) passing MPPS this is an indication of a downstream leak
• Salt and Oil give the same results (test it if you like). Use oil to minimize maintenance
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
29
3160 Calibration• Instrument uses electrical mobility which is the
standard method for checking submicron particle sizes and CPC’s which are the concentration standard
• Flows and pressure drops can be independently verified
• Field Installation is provided with new instruments to verify performance
• We provide Field Service and Service Contracts when requested by customers
© 2007, TSI Incorporated
30
3160 Features and BenefitsFeature Benefit
Automated Fractional Efficiency test Simpler and easier than developing this system from components
Includes computer and Windows software for current operating systems
Familiar Windows look and feel minimizes operation and training time
Flows and size controls are automatic or simple to use
Doesn’t require additional equipment or lots of time to set up tests
New expanded size range up to 0.8 microns
Provides information that previously required a different tester
Fast Test Mode Adds ability to use an instrument designed for fractional efficiency for fast quality control tests
Automatically adjusts concentration and test time to get the best results within the parameters you set
Eliminates the need to monitor the test for concentrations that are higher or lower than desired