texas assessment collaborative: assignment...
TRANSCRIPT
Texas Assessment Collaborative: Assignment Design
LEAP Texas: Texas Assessment Collaborative Webinar
March 29, 2016 @ 12:00pm
Assessment Fellows
Larry J. King, Ph.D. Chris Duke, Ph.D.
Professor of Communication Director of Student Learning & Institutional Assessment
Director of Curriculum & Assessment
Stephen F. Austin State University
San Jacinto College
[email protected]@ljking58
[email protected]@cmduke
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 2
For the Webinar
• Send any questions via the chat window for a Q&A session at the end.
• LEAPTx.org will have the presentation and webinar recording available on the website, to be shared via LEAP listserv and Twitter: http://leaptx.org/development-hub/texas-assessment-collaboratives/
• Conversation will continue at LEAPTx.org!
• Tweet! #LEAPTexas @LEAPTexas
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 3
Two Perspectives
1. Texas Assessment Collaborative focusing on written communication.
2. Intentional design of assignments for general education outcomes assessment against the LEAP VALUE rubrics.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative | March 29, 2016 4
Three Segments
1. Texas Assessment Collaborative parameters for written communication assignments.
2. LEAP Texas Faculty Fellows’ experiences with assignment design.
3. Strategy for adapting existing assignments for LEAP VALUE-based assessment.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative | March 29, 2016 5
ASSIGNMENT DESIGN
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 6
Intentional Design
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 7
OutcomeAssessment Instrument
Assignment
Written Communication
VALUE Rubric
Assignment?
Analyze Rubric
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 8
A note on parameters . . .
•Working at a state, multi-institutional level, we are focused on minimum parameters.•These are draft parameters for the
TAC; participating institutions have input.•May be applied at institutional level as
well to ensure students perform in manners expected by rubric.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 9
Format
• Written work, of course, with expected document formats including doc, docx, rtf, pdf, or txt.
• Excludes multiple choice exams and other modalities and formats (pptx, jpg, gif).
• Type-written work preferred; scanned handwriting is not preferred.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 10
Content Development
Length to allow enough space for appropriate development.
Minimum 750+ words or roughly 3 pages. Maximum 2,500 words or roughly 10 pages
Revisions. Documents that have gone through multiple revisions are fine; the work submitted should be considered a “final version.”
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 11
Writing Conventions
Sources and Evidence. Require use of sources/evidence appropriate to the discipline, e.g. primary sources, secondary sources, calculations, or lab results.
Discipline Conventions. Approach to organization, development, references consistent with discipline.
Syntax and Grammar may need to be emphasized.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 12
Logistical Parameters
Course Context. Regular graded assignment from the course (not extra/bonus credit).
Authorship. Independent work only. Samples must be from assignments completed by individual students.
Confidentiality/Anonymity. Subject matter of assignment should not identify student, faculty, or institution.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 13
Parameters
To be continued . . .
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 14
FACULTY FELLOWS & #LEAPTexas NILOA CharretteDr. Jennifer T. EdwardsAsst. Vice-President for Student Success and Multicultural InitiativesAssociate Professor of CommunicationTarleton State University
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 15
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 16
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 17
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 18
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 19
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 20
FACULTY COLLABORATIVE Karen MongoDean of Curriculum & AssessmentEl Centro College (DCCD)
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 21
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 22
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 23
ASSIGNMENT DESIGN STRATEGYRedesigning existing assignments to align properly with LEAP VALUE rubrics.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 24
Intentional Design
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 25
OutcomeAssessment Instrument
Assignment
Texas Core Objective
VALUE Rubric
Assignment?
Analyze Rubric
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 26
Alignment Worksheet
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 27
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 28
NEXT STEPS?
…
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 29
Next Steps,Participating Institutions
1. Consider and provide feedback regarding the assignment parameters.
2. TAC will collaboratively finalize assignment parameters by the end of the spring semester.
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 30
Additional Resources
• LEAP Texas Faculty Collaborative: Assignment & Signature Work
• NILOA Assignment Library at www.assignmentlibrary.org
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 31
Q & AReminder of upcoming #LEAPTexas Webinars . . .
Sampling Plans : Monday, April 11 @ 12:00pm
IRB or Institutional Approvals : Tuesday, April 26 @ 12:00pm
LEAP Texas Assessment Collaborative| March 29, 2016 32