text complexity

30
Text Complexity Defining Rigor through Research and the Common Core Standards

Upload: moana-herring

Post on 04-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Text Complexity. Defining Rigor through Research and the Common Core Standards. Outcomes. Define text complexity and describe why it matters Practice reading complex text and using text-based evidence in discussion Identify implications for our work as school and district leaders. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Text Complexity

Text Complexity

Defining Rigor through Research and the Common Core Standards

Page 2: Text Complexity

Outcomes

Define text complexity and describe why it matters

Practice reading complex text and using text-based evidence in discussion

Identify implications for our work as school and district leaders

Page 3: Text Complexity

Specifically, within reading standard #10:

Anchor Standard:

R.CCR.10 Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.

Progression of the Reading Standard 10 - Appendix A, page 10

What are some key words you notice in this standard?

Text Complexity

4

Page 4: Text Complexity

Protocol – part 1

Read Appendix A, pages 2, 3 and

top half of 4 Identify a passage that you feel has

implications for your work Identify a back up passage

Page 5: Text Complexity

Three Levels of Text Protocol

1. Form a group of three people

2. Identify a time keeper and a facilitator

3. One person has up to three minutes to:Level 1- read the passage you selected aloud

Level 2 – tell about what he/she thinks about the passage

Level 3 – Tell about what implications for his/her work

4. The group responds for up to two minutes

5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until everyone has shared their passage.

Page 6: Text Complexity

Overview of Text Complexity

Text complexity is defined by:

Qua

litat

ive

2. Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands often best measured by an attentive human reader.

Quantitative

1. Quantitative measures – readability and other scores of text complexity often best measured by computer software.

Reader and Task3. Reader and Task considerations – background knowledge of reader, motivation, interests, and complexity generated by tasks assigned often best made by educators employing their professional judgment.

Page 7: Text Complexity

Where do we find texts in the appropriate text complexity band?

Choose an excerpt of text from Appendix B:

We could...

or…

Use available resources to determine the text complexity of other materials on our own.

Page 8: Text Complexity

A Four-step Process:

Determining Text Complexity

10

QuantitativeQ

ualit

ativ

e

Reader and Task

4. Recommend placement in the appropriate text complexity band.

3. Reflect upon the reader and

task considerations.

2. Analyze the qualitative measures of the text.

1. Determine the quantitative measures of the text.

Page 9: Text Complexity

11

Measures such as:• Word length• Word frequency• Word difficulty• Sentence length• Text length• Text cohesion

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

Page 10: Text Complexity

Lexiles

12

The Quantitative Measures Ranges for Text Complexity Gr. Band Old Lexile Lexile Rangle

Aligned to the CC Standards

K - 1 N/A N/A

2 – 3 450 - 725 450 – 790

4 – 5 645 - 845 770 – 980

6 – 8 860 – 1010 955 – 1155

9 – 10 960 - -1115 1080 – 1305

11 - CCR 1070 – 1220 1215 - 1355

Page 11: Text Complexity

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

13

Let’s imagine we want to see where a text falls on the quantitative measures “leg” of the text complexity triangle, using the Lexile text measures.

For illustrative purposes, let’s choose Harper Lee’s 1960 novel To Kill a Mockingbird.

Page 12: Text Complexity

Finding a Lexile Measure for Text: http://www.lexile.com/findabook/

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

14

Page 13: Text Complexity

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

15

Page 14: Text Complexity

Text Complexity Grade Bands

Suggested Lexile Range

Suggested ATOS Book Level Range**

K-1 100L – 500L* 1.0 – 2.5

2-3 450L – 790L 2.0 – 4.0

4-5 770L – 980L 3.0 – 5.7

6-8 955L – 1155L 4.0 – 8.0

9-10 1080L – 1305L 4.6 – 10.0

11-CCR 1215L – 1355L 4.8 – 12.0

Quantitative Measures Ranges for Text Complexity Grade Bands

Kansas Common Core Standards

* The K-1 suggested Lexile range was not identified by the Common Core State Standards and was added by Kansas.

** Taken from Accelerated Reader and the Common Core State Standards, available at the following URL: http://doc.renlearn.com/KMNet/R004572117GKC46B.pdf

Page 15: Text Complexity

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

17

Lexile Text Measure:

ATOS Book Level

870L

5.6

Page 16: Text Complexity

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

18

For texts not in the Lexile database, consider using the Lexile Analyzer: http://www.lexile.com/analyzer/

• Registration is required (free) http://www.lexile.com/account/register/

• Allows user to receive an “estimated” Lexile score

• Accommodates texts up to 1000 words in length

• Texts of any length can be evaluated using the Professional Lexile Analyzer—educators can upgrade to this tool for free by requesting access http://www.lexile.com/account/profile/access/

Page 17: Text Complexity

19

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

Measures such as:• Levels of meaning• Levels of purpose• Structure• Organization• Language

conventionality• Language clarity• Prior knowledge

demands

Page 18: Text Complexity

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

20

The Qualitative Measures Rubrics for Literary and Informational Text:

The rubric for literary text and the rubric for informational text allow educators to evaluate the important elements of text that are often missed by computer software that tends to focus on more easily measured factors.

Page 19: Text Complexity

Partner Share

How do the demands for text complexity increase from low to high?

Page 20: Text Complexity

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

22

Page 21: Text Complexity

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

Lexile Text Measure:

ATOS Book Level:

870L

5.6

From examining the quantitative measures, we knew:

But after reflecting upon the qualitative measures, we believed:

Page 22: Text Complexity

24

Considerations such as:• Motivation• Knowledge and

experience• Purpose for reading• Complexity of task

assigned regarding text

• Complexity of questions asked regarding text

Step 3:Reader and Task Considerations

Page 23: Text Complexity

Step 3:Reader andTask Considerations

25

The questions included here are largely open-ended questions without single, correct answers, but help educators to think through the implications of using a particular text in the classroom.

Page 24: Text Complexity
Page 25: Text Complexity

Step 4: Recommended Placement

27

Based upon all the information—all three legs of the model—the final recommendation for To Kill a Mockingbird is….

Page 26: Text Complexity

Step 4: Recommended Placement

28

In this instance, Appendix Bconfirms our evaluation of the novel. To Kill a Mockingbird is placed within the grade 9-10 text complexity band.

Page 27: Text Complexity

Step 4: Recommended Placement

29

Template for Text Complexity Analysis and Recommended

Placement Form:

Page 28: Text Complexity

Implications

What are some implications for your school or district as you consider the levels of text complexity called for in the Common Core Standards?

Page 29: Text Complexity

Building Capacity

How will you share the your new learnings about Common Core back to your building or district?

Page 30: Text Complexity

Wrap Up

1. Exit Ticket

2. Feedback Form

3. Clock Hours