text talk text talk text talk - university of north florida 10-handouts-activity... · text talk...
TRANSCRIPT
Text Talk Text Talk Text Talk
Interactive Reading Interactive Reading Interactive Reading
Sustained Conversation
Sustained
Conversation
Sustained Conversation
Oral Language Strategy
Oral Language
Strategy
Oral Language Strategy
Text Talk Text Talk Text Talk
Interactive Reading Interactive Reading Interactive Reading
Sustained Conversation
Sustained
Conversation
Sustained Conversation
Oral Language Strategy
Oral Language
Strategy
Oral Language Strategy
Text Talk Interactive Reading Sustained
Conversation
Oral Language Strategy Text Talk Interactive Reading
.
The modules presented here were funded in part by the Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education as part of the Virtual School Readiness Incubator Project. The
content of these modules does not necessarily reflect the views or policies or imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education and/or the University of North Florida. These
prototype materials are still in development and refinement and should be used with this caution in mind.
A Self-Assessment of Director Professional
Development Practices in the Last 30 Days
1. Have I developed and/or addressed long-range plans which focus on professional development efforts aimed at center improvement?
2. Has my day-to-day planning provided me with enough time to address professional development objectives?
3. Have I involved my staff in the development of professional development objectives?
4. Do I communicate positive attitudes and my conviction that we have the ability to improve the organization?
5. Do I have a plan for my own professional growth and self-reflection?
6. Do I have procedures in place to monitor the progress and effects of professional development opportunities staff members attend?
7. Do I share the results of monitoring procedures with staff?
8. Do I encourage collaboration among staff members through the creation of small teams and common planning time?
9. Has my own relationship with staff reflected professional collaboration?
10. Have I encouraged teachers to try new practices?
11. Have I confronted behavior which is contrary to center values or objectives of the professional development program?
12. Have I publicly recognized the hard work of individual staff members and celebrated progress in our professional development program?
Sources:Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels
(3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Check Myself activity sheet
The modules presented here were funded in part by the Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education as part
of the Virtual School Readiness Incubator Project. The content of these modules does not necessarily reflect the views or policies
or imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education and/or the University of North Florida. These prototype materials are
still in development and refinement and should be used with this caution in mind.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Effective Professional Development handout
1EEFFFFEECCTTIIVVEE PPRROOFFEESSSSIIOONNAALL DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT
Over the past several years, training for educators has changed greatly. Staff
development for teachers was very much like the weather–everyone complained about it
but no one seemed to know how to improve it. Fortunately, the attention paid to
professional development in the past decade has helped to clarify what steps can be
taken to provide effective training for teachers. Research has demonstrated how
workshops can be designed, sequenced, and presented to engage teachers and increase
the likelihood of active participation in the training. An engaging workshop can also
increase the likelihood of teachers implementing the new practices or procedures they
have learned.
KEY #1: Effective Programs Are Purposeful
A nationwide study found that staff development efforts in most places have been
fragmented, unfocused, and lacking a common commitment. In contrast, effective
professional development is firmly rooted in goals and vision of a school. Therefore,
center-based workshops should be designed to meet identified priorities and promote
practices that will advance the entire center. An intentional effort should be made to
make the objectives of any training clear so teachers understand how the purpose of the
workshop is connected to the overall improvement goals of the center.
Key #2: Effective Programs Are Designed to Promote and Influence
Teachers’ Thinking about Teaching
Successful teachers are thoughtful teachers. Helping teachers develop the ability to think
about what they are doing should be a goal of any professional development activity.
Workshops should not create teachers who unthinkingly follow a “cookbook” approach to
teaching, but develop thoughtful educators who have the ability to assess and revise their
own actions in order to improve the achievement of their children. Challenging teachers to
discuss the whys and hows of what they do is a very effective way to develop their ability
to think reflectively. Equally important is ensuring that teachers have ongoing
opportunities for discussions.
The modules presented here were funded in part by the Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education as part
of the Virtual School Readiness Incubator Project. The content of these modules does not necessarily reflect the views or policies
or imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education and/or the University of North Florida. These prototype materials are
still in development and refinement and should be used with this caution in mind.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Effective Professional Development handout
2KEY #3: Effective Programs Are Research-Based Both in Content and
in Delivery
Training employees on ways to improve productivity is not new. Many lessons can be
learned from those who have gone before us! If teachers are asked to devote their time
and energy to implement a new practice or program, there should be some evidence that
the new practice or program will result in better outcomes. A training program design that
has been effective in helping all teachers includes the following steps:
1. Presentation of the theory
2. Demonstration
3. Initial practice
4. Prompt feedback
In addition, teachers need continued practice in the classroom and coaching in order to
master the new skill or strategy. It takes 20 to 30 practices of a new skill in order for
teachers to incorporate it into their teaching comfortably and adapt it to the needs of their
children. As directors, it is critical to remember to provide teachers with ongoing feedback
and support after their initial training.
Effective Professional Development Must Be Evaluated
There are four general levels of evaluation for staff development. The levels of questions
and strategies for answering each question are listed below.
Evaluating Level 3 and Level 4 is often the most difficult to complete because of the time
commitment required to collect and analyze data.
Question Strategy for Answering Question
Did participants enjoy the training? Questionnaire Did participants learn new skills? Create a task for participants to complete
and have them evaluate their own performance.
Did participants use their new skills on the job?
Observations
Did the training result in changes in behavior/ expected outcomes?
Collection of observable work
Sources: Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels
(3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Teacher Description handout
Ms. Yellow has a Bachelor s Degree in early childhood.
Her lesson plans are very detailed and she spends a lot of
time making materials and planning. She has attended a
workshop on how to use the curriculum that was very
motivating for her and has tried to implement many of
the ideas she learned at the workshop in her classroom.
Unfortunately, she has not been very successful because
her class is often out of control. Ms. Yellow is very soft
spoken and has a hard time implementing classroom
rules. The children do not follow any rituals and routines.
This does not appear to bother Ms. Yellow
but makes it very difficult for her to
accomplish what she has planned
each day.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Teacher Description handout
Ms. Blue has been teaching for about 10 years in early
childhood. Her classroom has not changed much during
the past 10 years. She uses the approved curriculum but
often uses a harsh tone with the children. She rarely
speaks to children directly and when she does she usually
says something negative. During the past few
observations you noticed that she does not make eye
contact with the children and always delivers her
instruction from a rocking chair at the front of the room.
Parents have complained because they feel
that she avoids talking with them.
While you feel that children are
learning while they are with her, you
are concerned about her manner
with children and parents.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Teacher Description handout
Ms. Red is new to early childhood education. She earned some
credit toward her CDA during high school. She has little
practical experience with children and was hired to teach 3-
and 4-year-olds who do not qualify for VPK. You feel that she
will be a good addition to the staff and would like her to finish
her CDA so you can move her into a VPK class for the summer.
She is enthusiastic but overwhelmed by the children. She has a
lot of materials and books in her classroom but does not seem
to use what is available. The children spend a lot of time
transitioning from activity to activity. Ms. Red writes lesson
plans but does not utilize them during her daily activities. She
has an experienced teacher as her mentor who has told you
that Ms. Red is good but getting
frustrated with the children and
doesn t quite seem to know what to
do during a full 8 hour day.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Teacher Description handout
Ms. Green directs all the activities during the day. She is a VPK
teacher and uses an approved curriculum but does not utilize
small groups. All lessons are whole group with children sitting
at tables working quietly completing worksheets. Her classroom
management is excellent, with few behavior problems. The
children in her class are behaved but show little interest in the
tasks that they are completing. Ms. Green has an Associate’s
Degree in child development. Every time you observe a lesson,
the questions are directed to the group, not an individual child.
You are concerned because the children do not have any choice
in the activities they complete. They do the same things every
day. While you feel that Ms. Green has many strengths, you
would like to see her use the curriculum
and VPK standards in a manner that is
more child friendly and promotes more
positive interaction in the classroom.
The modules presented here were funded in part by the Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education as part
of the Virtual School Readiness Incubator Project. The content of these modules does not necessarily reflect the views or policies
or imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education and/or the University of North Florida. These prototype materials are
still in development and refinement and should be used with this caution in mind.
ELELS Instructional Alignment Session Ten: Developing Goals activity sheet
Source: Neugebauer, Bonnie, & Neugebauer, Roger (Eds.), (2003). Theart of leadership: Managing early childhood organizations. Redmond, WA: Child Care Information Exchange.
Developing Professional Development Goals Focused on Improvement: Creating a clear improvement goal is important in helping others understand the need for
professional development and in guiding the content and processes. The following questions provide a guide for leading group discussions with your staff.
Step 1: Determine if a need exists. Specific, Observable Evidence of Need:
Possible Cause of the Problem: People Affected by the Problem:
Step 2: State the need or problem as an improvement goal. Desired Achievement:
Timeline(s) for Achievement: How Success Will Be Measured:
Step 3: Write the improvement goal. Improvement Goal:
The modules presented here were funded in part by the Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education as part
of the Virtual School Readiness Incubator Project. The content of these modules does not necessarily reflect the views or policies
or imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education and/or the University of North Florida. These prototype materials are
still in development and refinement and should be used with this caution in mind.