thanaphat p

14
Portfolio Thanaphat Phakdeeworrawong Mobile: 086-622-6615 Email: [email protected]

Upload: thanaphat-phakdeeworrawong

Post on 13-Apr-2017

118 views

Category:

Engineering


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Thanaphat P

PortfolioThanaphat Phakdeeworrawong

Mobile: 086-622-6615

Email: [email protected]

Page 2: Thanaphat P

ANSYSComputational Fluid & Dynamics (CFD)

Page 3: Thanaphat P

ANSYS Computational Fluid & Dynamics (CFD)

“Mathematical Simulation for Pulverized Fuel Combustion”

Overall Structure of Furnace

Structure of Burner

Schematic Diagram of The Burner for Simulation

The pattern of flow in combustion burner

Page 4: Thanaphat P

ANSYS Computational Fluid & Dynamics (CFD)

“Mathematical Simulation for Pulverized Fuel Combustion”

Proximate analysis

Volatile

Fixed carbon

Moisture

Ash

(% mass)

35.8

53.7

6.3

4.2

Ultimate analysis

Carbon

Hydrogen

Nitrogen

Sulphur

Oxygen

(% mass)

83.1

4.35

1.29

1.55

9.71

Particle Size Distribution (µm)

0-10

10-25

25-40

40-75

>75

(% mass)

15.0

25.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

Gross calorific value (MJ/kg) 29.29

Central pipe: Air flow rate (kg/s)

Swirl number

Temperature (K)

2.925 x 10-4

0.0

353

Primary pipe: Air flow rate (kg/s)

Swirl number

Temperature (K)

Coal feed rate (kg/s)

9.344 x 10-3

0.0

353

0.39 × 10-2

Secondary pipe: Air flow rate (kg/s)

Swirl number

Temperature (K)

3.537 x 10-2

1.03

573

Excess air (%) 15

CHARACTERISTICS OF BITUMINOUS COAL FURNACE OPERATING CONDITION

Kinetic parameters :

Devolatilization Activation Energy, (J/kg-mol)

Pre-Exponential Factor

7.40 × 107

3.82 x 105

Char Reaction Activation Energy, (J/kg-mol) 7.90 x 107

KINETIC PARAMETERS FOR COAL COMBUSTION

Page 5: Thanaphat P

ANSYS Computational Fluid & Dynamics (CFD)

“Mathematical Simulation for Pulverized Fuel Combustion”

Furnace & Burner Velocity Particle Trajectory Temperature Oxygen

Page 6: Thanaphat P

ANSYSStatic Structural

Page 7: Thanaphat P

ANSYS “Static Structural Simulation”

Material Properties

Slider

Clamper

Clamper (SST)

Kinematic HardeningYield 1,029 MPa

Simplified Model to FEA (Clamper and Slider)

Page 8: Thanaphat P

ANSYS “Static Structural Simulation”

Config. Node Element Min. Qual Max.Qual Avg. Qual

Clamper 1.0 19,314 12,528 0.057 0.999 0.948

Hexahedral meshing

Page 9: Thanaphat P

ANSYS “Static Structural Simulation”

Fix all DOF at

welding spots

Non-linear

solver is applied

Augmented-Lagrange formula

Friction Coefficient = 0.5Displacement load on

slider surface

6 loading step, max displacement

up to 0.150 mm

Loading / Constraint / Contact / Solver

Page 10: Thanaphat P

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

ST

RE

SS

(M

PA

)X - DEFORMATION (MM)

Total Stress1.0

0

100

200

300

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

ST

IFF

NE

SS

(G

/MM

)

X - DEFORMATION (MM)

X - Stiffness1.0

ANSYS “Static Structural Simulation”

Results

Page 11: Thanaphat P

SolidWorksTooling / Jig Fixture

Page 12: Thanaphat P

SolidWorks “Tooling / Jig Fixture”

Page 13: Thanaphat P

SolidWorks “Tooling / Jig Fixture”

Page 14: Thanaphat P

Thank you

Thanaphat Phakdeeworrawong