the advanced institute of management research: past, present and future andy neely/robin wensley aim...
TRANSCRIPT
The Advanced Institute of Management Research:Past, Present and Future
Andy Neely/Robin WensleyAIM Research
Agenda
• Welcome and introductions
• Introducing AIM: Phases 1 and 2
• New opportunities:– The management practices call– High Value Manufacturing
• Q&A
Agenda
• Welcome and introductions
• Introducing AIM: Phases 1 and 2
• New opportunities:– The management practices call– High Value Manufacturing
• Q&A
What is AIM?
• AIM: The UK’s Research Initiative on Management.
• Budget of £35+ million invested by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
• Used to fund over 250 Fellows and Scholars – all leading academics in their fields…
• Working in cooperation with leading international academics and specialists as well as UK policy makers and business leaders…
• Undertaking a wide range of collaborative research projects…
• Disseminating ideas and shared learning through publications, reports, workshops and events…
• Fostering new ways of working more effectively with managers and policy makers…
• To enhance UK competitiveness and policy…
AIM’s mission and objectives
Mission – to significantly increase the contribution of and future capacity for world class UK research on management.
Objectives1. Conduct research that will identify actions to enhance the UK’s international
competitiveness.
2. Raise the scientific quality and international standing of UK research on international competitiveness.
3. Expand the size and capacity of the active research base for UK research on management.
4. Develop the engagement of that capacity with world class research outside the UK and with practitioners as co-producers of knowledge about management and other users of research within the UK.
AIM’s mission and objectives: Phase 2
Mission – to significantly increase the contribution of and future capacity for world class UK research on management.
Objectives1. Conduct research that will identify actions to enhance the UK’s international
competitiveness.
2. Raise the scientific quality and international standing of UK research on international competitiveness.
3. Expand the size and capacity of the active research base for UK research on management.
4. Develop the engagement of that capacity with world class research outside the UK and with practitioners as co-producers of knowledge about management and other users of research within the UK.
Context for AIM Phase 2
Three cohorts of early/mid career fellowsInnovation + targeted initiativeServicesManagement Practices + management practices survey [probably].
Plus ongoing activities with previous fellowsSenior Fellows, Public Service Fellows and Ghoshal Fellows IPGC Fellows [being managed by John Bessant] Ideas Factory [being managed by Uwe Aicklen]
AIM Scholars [as appropriate]
Support staff/AIM office…Claire [Office Mgmt], Agi [Events], Hannah [Website], TBA (Comms)
Agenda
• Welcome and introductions
• Introducing AIM: Phases 1 and 2
• New opportunities:– The management practices call– High Value Manufacturing
• Q&A
ESRC principles: QII
• Quality - funding research and training of the highest quality by world standards
• Impact - focusing on areas of major national imaportance and key policy areas
• Independence - ensuring independence from political, commercial or sectional interests
The research agenda for management practices
• Explaining Practices, Exploring Implications
• Practices and Competitive Advantage
• Barriers to Sustained Improvement
• Adopting and Applying Practice
The most effective practices are developed locally and emerge from processes of trial and error on the part of first-line employees, often working in conjunction with other organisations. What are the implications of this for the effective development of new practices within any organisation?
Given that it is the way practices are performed and the embeddedness and recursiveness of practices that provides the basis of the promise they hold to contribute to organisational innovation and competitiveness, how far should practice development be seen as a gradual process within the organisation and how far a radical introduction of a new approach?
Explaining Practices, Exploring Implications
How do organisations best manage the tension between adopting a generic practice of some degree of proven external success while developing particular more local practices to enhance differential advantage?
How far should economic policy encourage parity or differential advantage at the level of the firm or unit? How should it compare a focus on the adoption of generic practices where there is some degree of evidence of wide spread positive impact with encouraging local development of particular approaches?
How much is the performance impact of management practices more related to a particular “bundle” of practices rather one particular practice?
Practices and Competitive Advantage
Why do managers seem so reluctant, in general, to pick up and run with promising practices? Are there enough rewards and incentives when they do? How much is adoption a function of leadership and authority? In what ways is evidence of impact used to support the development of particular practices.
How do we better understand the actual process of implementing new management practices? How managers (and crucially also, employees) interpret them and make them their own; how they deal with the unintended consequences of putting textbook ideas into practice, which in turn feeds back into the idea itself.
How far can innovation in management practices be seen as a special case of more general issues in innovation: the extent to which they should be characterised as "open", "user-led" and influenced by the relevant IP regime? What are the barriers to practice innovation at firm and sectoral levels?
Barriers to Sustained Improvement
How should the challenge of achieving the right balance between looking outward to identify new and promising practices and looking inward to identify and build on the specific organisational ‘heritage’ of distinctive promising practices be handled?
How should practice development be applied given the research which suggests that alongside questions relating to the intervention and its leaders, contextual factors — addressing internal barriers and organisational issues, and fitting the intervention to the context and other change programmes — plays a large part in ensuring that the improvement generated from a new management practice can be sustained over time?
How does the adoption of particular practices relate to the transformations in and identification of appropriate business models? What are the implications for management practices of applying new technologies to different business models and how might this impact on value added and performance?
Adopting and Applying Practice
Current Draft Wording:
“The ESRC is interested to hear of proposals for research in any of the three main sectors of the economy: private, public or third, as well as comparative work. It is particularly interested in any work in the following priority areas: financial services, management consultancy, creative industries, retail and marketing.”
Sectors of the Economy
The Fellowships in management practices are for two years’ research time which need not be taken in one block
Researchers from any discipline are eligible to apply
Full salary costs are payable for 60% time commitment, at 80% of Full Economic Cost
Mid-Career Fellowships
Interaction with AIM colleagues will take the equivalent of least 2 full days per month throughout the duration of the Fellowships
Annual budget of up to £20,000 for travel and incidental research expenses in support of personal research activity
Annual budget of up to £10,000 for networking with other groups with interests linked to personal research activity
AIM Directors will provide opportunities for Mid-Career Fellows to apply for additional funds for Visiting International Fellows
The extent of institutional non-financial support for the application will be taken into account in the assessment of a proposal.
Business support for proposed research can be demonstrated through covering letters of support and non-trivial levels of cash and/or in-kind contributions.
Mid-Career Fellowships(Smaller Print)
Mid-Career Fellowships Timetable
29 September 2008 Publication of Call September - October 2008 Information Seminars for potential applicants 13 November 2008 Closing date for applications February 2009 Interviews of shortlisted applicants February 2009 Commissioning Panel meeting April 2009 Funding decisions notified to applicants Sept 2009 – Jan 2010 Fellowships start
For further information
• Websites: www.aimresearch.org and ESRC www.esrc.ac.uk
• AIM: Robin Wensley ([email protected]) or Andy Neely ([email protected])
• Tel: 0870 734 3000
• ESRC: Teresa Tucker ([email protected])
• Tel: 01793 442858.
• Web guide on how to apply to the ESRC: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/How/presentations/index.aspx
High Value Manufacturing
• New call for research into Global Value Systems for High Value Manufacturing (£5 million funding provided by TSB, EPSRC and ESRC).
• See www.innovateuk.org
Information day 22nd October 2008
Competition opens 19th January 2009
Expressions of Interest deadline 26th February 2009
Feedback provided by 16th March 2009
Feedback discussion in week beginning 16th March 2009
Applicants briefing (mandatory) 25th March 2009
Registration of intent to submit (mandatory) 23rd April 2009
Deadline for receipt of full applications 30th April 2009
Decision and feedback to applicants 29th May 2009
Agenda
• Welcome and introductions
• Introducing AIM: Phases 1 and 2
• New opportunities:– The management practices call– High Value Manufacturing
• Q&A