CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

The Agape Constant, F:

A Mathematical Model of Humans

By Peter Anyebe

AGAPE

CONSULTANTS

5th

September, 2015

HubPages

View

my profile

WordPress

Google Me

Google+

Website:

www.identi

tykit.biz

Given the natural order, and learning as the capacity to reconstruct it, it

becomes possible to predict behavior from thought; then productivity and

leadership would derive from self-control, which predicts learning

Keywords: Thought, Behavior, Learning, Productivity, Leadership,

Self-control, Natural order, Personal Order, Reality, Imagery

CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

The Agape Constant, F:

A Mathematical Model of Humans

By

Peter Anyebe

0.00 Abstract

Humans are conceptualized as faith, F personalities, to the extent that the personal

order, P-O approximates the natural order, N-O; which would be sufficient

evidence of imagery, as operationalized in the unity of humanity with the universe.

To the extent of the capacity for self-control, ScR the capacities for productivity and

leadership would be determined, which point to a certain behavior pattern that is

process oriented. And to the extent that a person is learned, it would be possible to

predict the behavior pattern from the thought pattern; which actually points to

creative thought that is intellectual, and at optimum puts the emotion in check for

self-control.

To establish imagery therefore, dimensionality is reduced into relativity; which is

then measured on the F-Scale, against the absolute that would then be non-

dimensional. The factors Pc, Rn, and n are measured on the identity kit, Id-Kit to

establish the productivity model, for RES = RGT, Nu 4 and Ps 20%. Eighteen,

18 of the one hundred, 100 subjects measured scaled the consistency test to qualify

for the rest of the analyses, but only two, 2 of these fulfilled the requirements of the

model. When the Id-Kit is coupled with the bill of health index, BHI which uses

input from the books of organizations including revenue, profit, and cost of

materials; the same two, 2 subjects are returned, as self-contained, ScT. The six, 6

metrics that are derived from this analysis become basis to evaluate self-control,

following which leadership is reduced to the equality in the scores on the factors f0,

ScT, ScR, and RtN; by which for the third, 3rd

time, the two, 2 subjects are returned,

to reject all four, 4 hypotheses.

View my profile Google Me WordPress

1.00 Hypothesis

To put a value on people uniquely, it would be unreasonable to conceptualize

humans as one, 1 with the universe, to the extent that the personal order, P-O

is able to approximate the natural order, N-O, for f0 1:

To put a value on people against the backdrop of their thought process, f0 it

would be unreasonable to expect humans to be a reflection of their thoughts, to

the extent that the behavior pattern, Fb and the thought pattern, Fp are

equivalent concepts, for Fb = 1 / 10 (10Fp + 1).

To evaluate the human capacity for productivity, it would be unreasonable to

expect a positive relationship between the appropriateness of the responses to

stimuli, for RES = RGT; and the capacity to reconstruct the four, 4 strategic

objectives, for Nu 4; as well as the location of the subject on the Pareto 80

20 continuum, for Ps 20%:

To evaluate the human capacity for leadership, it would be unreasonable to

expect scores to be equal for the following four, 4 factors:

f0

ScR

ScT

RtN

1.10 Research Questions

The research questions from which these hypotheses are derived are presented as

follows:

Is it feasible despite Immanuel Kant who posited the impossibility to derive

noumena or the N-O that, humans are one with the universe; to the extent of

the human potential capacity to reconstruct reality, and thereby approximate

the N-O?

Does it follow from the above that, thought and behavior are equivalent

concepts; in the sense that, the behavior pattern can be predicted from the

thought pattern?

When the responses to stimuli are appropriate therefore, would this imply that

the person is productive, to the extent that they are able to derive the four, 4

strategic objectives; and that they are leaders, being 20%ters according to the

Pareto 80-20 rule?

Is it feasible to corroborate the definition of leadership in three, 3 above, with

the unity in the subjects scores on the factors f0, ScT, ScR, and RtN?

2.00 Literature

For the review of the literature, it would be sufficient in this work, to reference the

following documents, in series:

3.00 Methodology

To derive the natural order, N-O the following three, 3 principles were referenced:

3. Agape Research Literature

2. Emotional Intelligence 6. EI on Pinterest

1. CIPD Centenary Site 5. Labor on the Shelf

4. Precise HR

Relativity,

Normality, and

Duality

Thus by Einsteins relativity principle an event in space would be viewed from an

infinite number of positions, each of which actually represents a perspective of the

event; which points to the possibility of an infinite number of realities, for every

person. But by the normality principle in games theory, a game of infinite moves

could be reduced into one, 1 unit move, which would then be iterated until the game

ends. The duality series in operations research is adopted to define the unit

perspective that this suggests as follows:

Maxima

Minimax

Maximin

Minima

Notice that this series defines the normal curve, following which about 68% of all

occurrences fall within one, 1 and three, 3 standard deviations from the mean. For a

thought pattern that approximates the N-O therefore, the resultant behavior pattern

would be normal, to the extent that about 68% of the activities fall within one, 1 and

three, 3 standard deviations from the mean. And to evaluate normality for individual

cases, it would be sufficient to measure the ratio of the relative on the absolute,

which defines the closeness with which the former approximates the latter. Recall

that while relativity is dimensional, the absolute is non-dimensional. Then normality

would actually represent the ratio of a vector on a scalar, which retains the unit of

the vector. The following three, 3 factors are measured, for establishment:

Self-control, ScR: ScR = ScT / LnG

Business environment, EB: EB = BHIF / BHI

Organizational culture, Org-C: Org-C = BHIG / BHI

Then the concept is applied to the measure of the monetized return on investment,

ROI as ROI = Profit / ROI. This enhances a precise HR, to put the right workforce,

ScR in the right environment, EB delivering profitable business results, ROI. So that

labor can be put on the shelf, as a commodity.

The Sn-Score, the f0-Scores, and the F-Score are kernel and define the form of the

Id-Kit. A demo of how these measures operate is presented at the following links:

Demos: https://app.box.com/s/0vydt2sx1aorf5hier09onry4pp5b19i

Sn-Score: https://app.box.com/s/3jexfwbg4lzn1ef6zws634gcdwdx2jkp

f0-Score: https://app.box.com/s/8s8469rgapq160o8so2b4ketvn0yrq3x

F-Score: https://app.box.com/s/dr5u0e5al1uaaxvu7kjoutr8m4x3im1j

4.00 Derivation

The infinite number of positions from which events are viewed define a sphere,

which rolls out into the number line, in its linear form as follows:

- 0 +

A F L

When the absolute is applied to the number line and all the items are squared, it

normalizes the relativity continuum as follows:

Then the mathematical model of humans would be derived as an equation of the

form that follows:

2

F

A L

3

The Relativity Continuum

1. L = 11/A

2. L = 2F

3. A = 3F

4. 3 = 1/2

5. 1 = LA: from 1

= F2: from 2, 3, and 4

For:

L = 1/A F

2QED: Substituting in 1

5.00 Concluding

As faith personalities, F what distinguishes between people would be knowledge, to the

extent that they are able to reconstruct reality according to the N-O. And what distinguishes

between the learned would be fasting, defined as the capacity to do without, which

determines delayed gratification. Recall that in general, information that enters the brain

reaches the emotion before the intellect. Recall also that the emotion, from which responses

to stimuli are directed, is often programmed with processes that cause below optimum

performance. This is what necessitates unlearning and relearning, to replace the faulty

programs with new ones that are more correct and lead to unconscious competency, which

is done by the intellect.

This requires that responses to stimuli from the emotion are delayed, until the intellect has

defined the more appropriate response. How well this is done would be evident in the scores

on the four, 4 strategic factors including f0, ScT, ScR, and RtN. Recall that these factors are

evaluated from measures of another six, 6 factors; three, 3 of which are from the Id-Kit; and

the other three, 3 from the organizations books, to measure the BHI. While the Id-Kit

evaluates the thought pattern, the BHI evaluates the behavior pattern, both of which are

connected by learning. Underlying these scores would be the capacities for productivity, Nu

as well as leadership, Ps both of which are connected by self-control, ScR. Moreover, recall

the following dictum:

Thus given self-control, ScR, objectivity, f0 defined as the approximation of the

N-O, as well as self-containment, ScT would be determined. And together, these

would determine workforce retention, RtN; serially as follows:

L = Positivity

A = Negativity

F = Relativity

F2 = The Absolute

A God who is self-contained

Created a universe that is self-contained

So that when humans become self-contained

They create institutions that are self-contained

3. ScT

2. ScR

1. f0

4. RtN

6.00 Data

Hypotheses 1 3

The first, 1st two,

2 of the eighteen,

18 subjects

satisfy the

requirements of

the productivity

model, with data

from the identity

kit, Id-Kit:

RES = RGT,

Nu 4

Ps 20%

Hypotheses 3 & 4

When the

productivity model

is combined with

the bill of health

index, BHI which

is evaluated for

companies with

data from their

books; the same

two, 2 subjects are

predicted

Hypothesis 4

When the

productivity model

is combined with

the bill of health

index, BHI, as well

as the self-control

model, the same

two, 2 subjects are

predicted