the agony of reconstruction
DESCRIPTION
The Agony of Reconstruction. The U.S. after the Civil War. Questions for Discussion. What were the opposing views of Reconstruction in the wake of the Civil War? Who supported these competing views and why? Was Reconstruction a success? Why or why not?. Abraham Lincoln. Lawyer Statesman - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The U.S. after the Civil War
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• What were the opposing views of Reconstruction in the wake of the Civil War?
• Who supported these competing views and why?
• Was Reconstruction a success? Why or why not?
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Lawyer• Statesman• 16th President (1861-1865)• Assassinated April 14, 1865
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Succeeded Lincoln as President• Southern Democrat
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Can the US ever truly be united?• Can blacks and whites live together? • Who runs this country?
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Born in Cologne, Germany• Revolutionary figure in Germany• Public speaker and abolitionist• Hated Southerners• Reported on the effect of the Civil War on the
South at Johnson’s request
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Physically• Legally and Constitutionally• Emotionally
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Asserted congressional power over Reconstruction.
• Required that a majority of a seceded state’s white men take a loyalty oath and guarantee back equality.– Sound familiar to anyone?
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Presidential Theory• Southern Theory• Conquered Provinces Theory• “Forfeited Rights” Theory
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Southern states never out of the Union• Not “Reconstruction,” but “Restoration.”• Minor modifications• Restore political rights• Appointment of governors
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• War proved secession could not take place therefore they’d never left the union.
• Therefore, no Constitutional question• Everythign should revert back to the way it
was
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Backed by Thaddeus Stevens and Radical Republicans
• Shattered the Constitution• Southern states subject to international law as
a “conquered province.”
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Ultimately governed Reconstruction• Secession null and void but emphasized that
governments had rebelled• Because rebellion, they forfeited rights under
the Constitution• Becomes the duty and right of Congress to
ensure republican form of government• Became the theory that underlay the
Reconstruction Act of 1867
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• After 1866 elections, “Radical” meant being committed to destroying slavery and guaranteeing civil rights for African Americans
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Influential leader of Reconstruction• Served in congress• Abolitionist• Led impeachment forces against Johnson• Sponsored radical plan of Reconstruction
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Abolistionst• Labor reformer• Speaker• Abandoned practice of law to speak on
social/policital issues
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Senator• Deeply devoted to cause of civil rights• Joined Stevens as leader of Radicals
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Freedman’s Bureau Bill of 1866• Civil Rights act of 1866
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• President of the CFA• Only military leader of Cnfederacy to be
placed in prison• Served two years
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• In response to Reconstruction, many Southerners embraced “the lost cause,” an image of Confederate soldiers battling to maintain Southern traditions and institutions.
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• How did the Civil War transofrm the South? What I really a “new” south? Why or why not?
• Were freed slaves better off in the South after the Civil War? Why or why not?
• What were the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments? Did they transofrm American society? Why or why not?
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• By the late 1860s some Southerns were already calling for a more diversified economy
• Slow shift from famrs to factories
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Never monolithic – never a monopoly on racism, violence or one –party politics. Just seemed that way in comparison to the rest of the country.
• Only white Southerners have been defeated in way and had their territory occupied by enemy
• Until 1950, majority of blacks in US lived in the South• “Solid South” refers to no Republican presidential
candidate carrying the South between 1877-1920
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• No longer two separate nations – erased the Mason-Dixon line
• Southern economy had changed• Race relations had changed
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Native of Atlanta, GA. • Correspondent of New York Herald• Conceptualized “new south”
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• Reconstruction of infrastructure– Railroads– Ports– Roads– communications
• Industrialization– Cotton– Iron– tobacco
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• 13th amendment: slavery punishable by law• 14th amendment: citizenship granted to any
person born in the US• 15th amendment: right for all adult males to
vote– This annoyed women
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu
• KKK• Redeemers• “Mississipi Plan”• “Grandfather Clause”• “Jim Crow” laws• Plessy v. Ferguson
lecture notes from us.history.wisc.edu