the american journey - weebly...abraham lincoln’s victory prompted the secession of six southern...
TRANSCRIPT
-
The American JourneyA History of the United States, 7th Edition
By: Goldfield • Abbott • Anderson • Argersinger • Argersinger • Barney • Weir
Chapter
•The Politics of
Sectionalism
•1846-1861
14
-
The Politics of Sectionalism
1846-1861
Slavery in the Territories
Political Realignment
The Road to Disunion
Conclusion
-
Learning Objectives
Why was the issue of slavery in the territories so
contentious?
What factors contributed to the Republicans’ rise to political
prominence?
Why were Southerners so alarmed by the election of
Abraham Lincoln in 1860?
-
Slavery in the Territories
-
Slavery in the Territories
From the late 1840s until 1861, northern and southern
leaders attempted to fashion a solution to the problem of
slavery in the territories.
-
The Wilmot Proviso
Proposed by Pennsylvania Democrat David Wilmot in 1846,
the Wilmot Proviso called for outlawing of slavery in any
territories acquired from Mexico.
The debate over the proviso aroused distrust and suspicion
between Northerners and Southerners as Congress
divided along sectional lines.
-
The Wilmot Proviso (cont'd)
Wilmot Proviso
The amendment offered by Pennsylvania Democrat David Wilmot in
1846 which stipulated that “as an express and fundamental condition
to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico . . .
neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of
said territory.”
-
The Election of 1848
To defuse the slavery issue, Democratic presidential
nominee Lewis Cass proposed the doctrine of popular
sovereignty that let the people decide on whether slavery
would be permitted or not.
-
The Election of 1848 (cont’d)
The Whig nominee Zachary Taylor was silent on the slavery
issue but northern Whigs bolted the party and formed the
Free-Soil Party with a platform of “free soil, free speech,
free labor, free men.”
-
The Election of 1848 (cont’d)
Taylor won the election.
Popular Sovereignty
A solution to the slavery crisis suggested by Michigan senator Lewis
Cass by which territorial residents, not Congress, would decide
slavery’s fate.
-
The Gold Rush
The discovery of gold in California triggered a rush that
brought more than 100,000 people to the territory.
San Francisco was transformed from a small port to a
bustling metropolis.
-
The Compromise of 1850
When California applied for admission to the Union, the
issue of parity among slave and free states arose.
President Taylor supported a version of popular sovereignty.
-
The Compromise of 1850 (cont’d)
Henry Clay offered the Compromise of 1850 that was
eventually passed when Illinois Senator Stephen A.
Douglas offered the proposals as separate initiatives.
-
The Compromise of 1850 (cont’d)
The major benefit for southerners was a stronger Fugitive
Slave Act.
Fugitive Slave Act
Law, part of the Compromise of 1850 that required authorities in the
North to assist southern slave catchers and return runaway slaves to
their owners.
-
MAP 14–1 The Compromise of 1850
-
Response to the Fugitive Slave Act
Free African Americans in the North responded to the
Fugitive Slave Act by forming associations for protection
and resistance.
Frederick Douglass convened the National Black
Convention in 1853 to establish a national council but it
failed.
-
Slavery in the Territories (cont'd)
Compromise of 1850
The four-step compromise which admitted California as a free state,
allowed the residents of the New Mexico and Utah territories to decide
the slavery issue for themselves, ended the slave trade in the District
of Columbia, and passed a new fugitive slave law to enforce the
constitutional provision stating that a slave escaping into a free state
shall be delivered back to the owner.
-
Uncle Tom’s Cabin
Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel ignited a firestorm over
slavery, moving many northerner whites to more active
antislavery participation.
Southerners condemned Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
-
The Election of 1852
The Compromise of 1850 had divided the Whigs.
Democratic candidate Franklin Pierce won a landslide over
Whig candidate General Winfield Scott.
-
Political Realignment
-
Young America’s
Foreign Misadventures
Franklin Pierce supported the Young America movement to
expand American influence into the Caribbean and Latin
America.
The Ostend Manifesto called for the United States to buy
Cuba and aroused an uproar in the United States and
other nations.
-
Young America’s
Foreign Misadventures (cont'd)
William Walker attempted to gain control of Nicaragua but
failed.
Ostend Manifesto
Message sent by U.S. envoys to President Pierce from Ostend, Belgium,
in 1854, stating that the United States had a “divine right” to wrest
Cuba from Spain.
-
Stephen Douglas’s Railroad Proposal
Senator Stephen A. Douglas wanted the transcontinental
railroad route to go through Chicago and Indian-occupied
Nebraska Territory.
President Pierce forced the Native Americans to cede land
for the railroad in 1853.
-
Stephen Douglas’s Railroad Proposal (cont’d)
Douglas sought congressional approval to set up a
government in the Nebraska Territory.
-
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
Douglas’ Kansas-Nebraska Bill broke the territory into two
territories, Kansas and Nebraska.
Douglas supported popular sovereignty.
Northerners were outraged because the Bill repealed the
Missouri Compromise and showed the South’s
determination to spread slavery.
-
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
President Pierce supported the Kansas-Nebraska Bill which
became law.
Kansas-Nebraska Act
Law passed in 1854 creating the Kansas and Nebraska Territories but
leaving the question of slavery open to residents, thereby repealing
the Missouri Compromise.
-
“Bleeding Kansas”
Northerners and Southerners rushed to settle Kansas and
gain a majority in the territory.
The proslavery forces fraudulently elected a legislature and
passed laws supporting slavery.
Sporadic violence erupted leading journalists to call the
conflict “Bleeding Kansas.”
-
“Bleeding Kansas” (cont'd)
“Bleeding Kansas”
Violence between pro- and antislavery forces in Kansas Territory after
the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854.
-
MAP 14–2 The Kansas-Nebraska Act, 1854
-
Know-Nothings and Republicans: Religion and
Politics
Mounting violence polarized the North and South, widening
sectional conflicts within political parties.
Between 1854 and 1856, Northerners moved into new
political parties that changed the national political scene
and intensified the sectional conflict.
-
Know-Nothings and Republicans: Religion and
Politics (cont’d)
Anti-immigration feeling also contributed to the party
realignment. The Democrats tried to appeal to the Irish
immigrants but nativists formed the anti-immigrant, anti-
Catholic Know Nothing Party.
-
Know-Nothings and Republicans: Religion and
Politics (cont’d)
The Republican Party was formed in 1854 from a coalition
of antislavery Whigs and Democrats.
Know-Nothing Party
Anti-immigrant party formed from the wreckage of the Whig Party and
some disaffected northern Democrats in 1854.
-
Know-Nothings and Republicans: Religion and
Politics (cont’d)
Republican Party
Party headed by Thomas Jefferson that formed in opposition to the
financial and diplomatic policies of the Federalist Party; favored
limiting the powers of the national government and placing the
interests of farmers and planters over those of financial and
commercial groups; supported the cause of the French Revolution.
-
The Election of 1856
The election of 1856 was approached by a fragmented political party system.
The Know-Nothing and Republican parties each nominated candidates. John C. Frémont was the Republican candidate. The Know-Nothings split in northern and southern factions. Millard Fillmore represented the southern Know-Nothings while the northern group supported Frémont.
-
The Election of 1856 (cont’d)
The Democrats were divided and nominated James
Buchanan who won the election.
-
The Dred Scott Case
Dred Scott sued for his freedom and the case eventually
reached the Supreme Court.
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney dismissed Scott’s case and
his opinion argued African Americans in the northern
states were not citizens and so could not initiate a lawsuit.
He also ruled the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
-
The Dred Scott Case (cont'd)
African Americans strongly responded to the Dred Scott
decision.
Outrage over the Dred Scott decision boosted Republican
fortunes in the North.
-
The Dred Scott Case (cont'd)
Dred Scott decision
Supreme Court ruling, in a lawsuit brought by Dred Scott, a slave
demanding his freedom based on his residence in a free state and a
free territory with his master, that slaves could not be U.S. citizens and
that Congress had no jurisdiction over slavery in the territories.
-
The Lecompton Constitution
Violence had subsided in Kansas but passage of the
proslavery Lecompton Constitution failed to pass in the
Senate.
The Panic of 1857 was a severe economic recession that
continued into the election year of 1858.
-
The Lecompton Constitution (cont’d)
The Democratic administration did nothing to alleviate the
worsening economic conditions while the Republicans
claimed legislation they sponsored could have prevented
the Panic.
-
The Lecompton Constitution (cont’d)
Lecompton Constitution
Proslavery draft written in 1857 by Kansas territorial delegates elected
under questionable circumstances; it was rejected by two governors,
supported by President Buchanan, and decisively defeated by
Congress.
Panic of 1857
Banking crisis that caused a credit crunch in the North; it was less severe
in the South, where high cotton prices spurred a quick recovery.
-
The Religious Revival of 1857–1858
In the midst of economic depression and sectional
controversy, a religious revival swept across the nation’s
cities in the winter of 1857–1858.
Its long-range impact was significant not only culturally, but
politically, as emerging issues took on a deeper moral
dimension.
-
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
The Lincoln-Douglas debates pitted the incumbent
Democratic senator against former Whig congressman
Abraham Lincoln.
The debates were held throughout Illinois and highlighted
the differences between Democrats and Republicans and
North and South.
-
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates (cont'd)
Douglas won the election.
Lincoln-Douglas debates
Series of debates in the 1858 Illinois senatorial campaign during which
Democrat Stephen A. Douglas and Republican Abraham Lincoln
staked out their differing opinions on the issue of slavery in the
territories.
-
The Road to Disunion
-
North-South Differences
Ideological divisions were not the only differences dividing
North and South.
The North was increasingly urban and industrial while the
South remained rural and agricultural.
The rate of urban and industrial growth in the North was
greater than anywhere else in the world in the early
1800s.
-
North-South Differences (cont'd)
Other differences included more violent tendencies among
Southerners, a stronger inclination to serve in the military,
and a higher illiteracy rate.
Slavery accounted for many of the differences between
North and South.
-
MAP 14–3 Railroads in
the United States, 1860
-
South and North Compared in 1860
-
John Brown’s Raid
John Brown had become a celebrity in New England
intellectual and antislavery circles.
In 1859, Brown recruited a small “army” and attacked the
federal arsenal at Harper’s Ferry hoping to trigger a slave
uprising.
Troops under Colonel Robert E. Lee captured Brown and
his followers.
-
John Brown’s Raid (cont'd)
John Brown’s raid raised the worst fears of southerners.
John Brown’s Raid
New England abolitionist John Brown’s ill-fated attempt to free Virginia’s
slaves with a raid on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in
1859.
-
The Election of 1860
Northern Democrats were united behind Stephen A.
Douglas but southern extremists disrupted the convention
hoping to combine a Republican victory with secession.
Northern Democrats nominated Douglas while southern
Democrats nominated John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky.
-
The Election of 1860 (cont’d)
Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln and Whigs from
the Upper South formed the Constitutional Union Party to
nominate John Bell of Tennessee.
Lincoln won the election.
-
The Election of 1860 (cont’d)
Constitutional Union party
National party formed in 1860, mainly by former Whigs, that emphasized
allegiance to the Union and strict enforcement of all national
legislation.
Wide Awakes
Group of red-shirted, black-caped young men who paraded through city
streets in the North extolling the virtues of the Republican Party during
the 1860 presidential election campaign.
-
MAP 14–4 The Election of 1860
-
Secession and Slavery
Abraham Lincoln’s victory prompted the secession of six
southern states.
Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and
Texas formed the Confederate States of America.
Confederate States of America
Nation proclaimed in Montgomery, Alabama, in February 1861 after the
seven states of the Lower South seceded from the United States.
-
MAP 14–5 The Course of Secession
-
Presidential Inaction
A lame-duck president whose southern dominated cabinet had
left Washington, Buchanan did little to more than condemn
secession.
-
Peace Proposals
Kentucky Senator John J. Crittenden tried to package a
series of constitutional amendments to solve the sectional
dispute but this effort failed.
-
Lincoln’s Views on Secession
Lincoln did not support compromise measures on
secession.
Lincoln counted on Unionist sentiment to keep the Upper
South from seceding.
-
The Emerging Sectional Crisis
-
The Emerging Sectional Crisis
-
Fort Sumter: The Tug Comes
Lincoln vowed to uphold federal law and was conciliatory,
but southerners wanted concessions.
-
Fort Sumter: The Tug Comes (cont'd)
The surrender of Fort Sumter began the Civil War.
Fort Sumter
Begun in the late 1820s to protect Charleston, South Carolina, it became
the center of national attention in April 1861 when President Lincoln
attempted to provision federal troops at the fort, triggering a hostile
response from on-shore Confederate forces, opening the Civil War.
-
Conclusion
-
Conclusion
The Wilmot Proviso began the process that ended with the
outbreak of the Civil War.
Political conflict over slavery eventually focused on northern
efforts to stop southern expansion and southern to
maintain their power and influence in the federal
government by expanding slavery in the western
territories.
-
Conclusion (cont'd)
By 1861, neither national political and other organizations
could mute sectional animosities.