the biopsychosocial religion and health study (brhs) · the biopsychosocial religion and health...
TRANSCRIPT
The Biopsychosocial Religionand Health Study (BRHS)AKA Adventist Religion & Health Study
Funding from the NIH: National Institute of AgingPrimary Investigators: Gary Fraser (PI) and Jim Walters (Co-PI)Co-investigators: Denise Bellinger, Terry Butler, Jerry Lee, Kelly
Morton, Eric Walsh, Colwick Wilson, Christopher Ellison (Universityof Texas)
Consultants: Neal Krause, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; HaroldKoenig, Duke University; William Strawbridge, University ofCalifornia, San Francisco; Arthur A Stone, State University of NewYork, Stony Brook;Teresa Seeman, University of California, LosAngeles; and David Williams, Harvard University;
Cohort Profile: The biopsychosocial religion andhealth study (BRHS) Jerry W Lee; Kelly R Morton;James Walters; Denise L Bellinger; Terry L Butler;Colwick Wilson; Eric Walsh; Christopher G Ellison;Monica M McKenzie; Gary E Fraser
(In Press) International Journal of Epidemiology
Presentation based in part on:
Advanced Access:http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/extract/dyn244v1
Specific AimsTo examine manifestations of religious experience and theirpossible associations with quality of life, CHD and all-causemortality in Seventh-day Adventists, a group characterizedby general good health outcomes and considerablediversity in lifestyle.
To investigate whether these manifestations of religiousexperience have different associations with quality of life,CHD and all-cause mortality in African and EuroAmericans; and
To examine the possible relationships of thesemanifestations of religious experience to biochemical andphysiological indicators of stress, immune system function,coronary artery disease and aging.
Our basic model
AllostaticLoad
Morbidity,Mortality,
and Qualityof Life
Positive
Negative
CumulativeRisk
Exposure
Positive
Negative
ReligionRelated
Behaviors,Beliefs,
andEmotions
Lifestyle,Psycho-
logical andSocial
Mediatorsof Health
Cumulative Risk Exposure
Aggregates risk exposure acrossPhysical risks such as
PovertyPoor housing qualityViolence exposure
Psychosocial risk such asPoor parental bondPoor marital bondPoor job satisfaction
Allostatic Load
Allostasis—achieving biological stabilitythrough change. May involve changes inmultiple biological and behavioral systems.Allostatic load—cumulative burden that bothacute and lifetime stress place on theorganism.Primarily assessed by a combination ofbiologic, biometric, physical performance andcognitive function measures.
Our basic model
AllostaticLoad
Morbidity,Mortality,
and Qualityof Life
Positive
Negative
CumulativeRisk
Exposure
Positive
Negative
ReligionRelated
Behaviors,Beliefs,
andEmotions
Lifestyle,Psycho-
logical andSocial
Mediatorsof Health
Two arms of the studyPsyMRS
Psychosocial Manifestations of Religion20 page questionnaire sent to a randomsample of AHS-2 participants
BioMRSBiological Manifestations of ReligionBiometric, biologic, cognitive function andphysical performance measures
Sampling plan
AHS-2100,000
PsyMRS10,000
BioMRS500
PsyMRS3,000
BioMRS400
PsyMRS2,400
BioMRS320
Year 1 Year 4
PossibleFollow-up Grant
Year 7
On-going Mortality and Morbidity monitoring by AHS-2carried out on all participants.
Note: Current year 1 enrollment is 10,988 in PsyMRS and 508 in BioMRS.
PsyMRS—Questionnaire Assessmentof
Cumulative Risk ExposureReligious/spiritual commitment, attitudes,beliefs, and behaviorsPsychosocial and lifestyle mediators of areligion/health connectionQuality of life indicatorsControl variables (including demographics)
Cumulative Risk ExposureEarly relationships
Father love & abuseMother love & abuse
Risky family (of origin)Adult relationships
Spouse or partner positiveSpouse or partner negative
Trauma HistoryLast year, 1 to 5 years ago,more than 5 years ago, totalimpact
Jobstresscontrolsatisfaction
Unfair treatment (gender,race, age, religion, other)
LifetimeEveryday discrimination
HousingGrowing upCurrent
Difficulty meetingexpenses
Under 1818 to 35Last year
Perceived Stress
Religious/spiritual commitment,attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors
Church attendanceCongregational activityPercent co-religionist contactSpouse & Children’s religionChildren’s church schoolingCongregational sense of communityReligious support
Emotional Support ReceivedEmotional Support GivenNegative InteractionAnticipated Support
PrayerConfessionHabitMeditation/Contemplative
GratitudeForgivenessSpiritual meaning in LifeIntrinsic religiosity (DUREL)Loving versus controlling God
Positive and negative religious copingControl:
Self-directedCollaborativePassive DeferralActive surrender
Meaning;Benevolent ReappraisalPunishing God ReappraisalComfort:
Seeking Spiritual SupportSpiritual Discontent
TransformationSabbath keeping
Sabbath restFrom social pressure/guiltBuilds relationship with GodSacred activitiesSecular activities
Positive and negative eschatologicalattitudes
Psychosocial and lifestyle mediators of areligion/health connection (Based on Ellison & Levin, 1998)
Health behaviors & lifestyleExerciseDietSleep HoursAll AHS-2 lifestyle indicators
Healthy & Unhealthy BeliefsOptimismPessimism
Positive (& negative) emotionsPositive & negative affectHostilityDepression
Self-esteem & Personal efficacySelf-esteemMastery
Social integration & supportInformational supportInstrumental supportEmotional supportCompanionshipUnwanted advice orintrusionFailure to provide helpUnsympathetic orinsensitive behaviorRejection or neglect
Coping resources & behaviorsThese are included underreligious coping and prayer
Quality of life indicators
Physical & Mental Health(SF-12)
Physical functioningRole physical (Also SF-36)
Role emotionalBodily painGeneral health (Also SF-36)
VitalitySocial functioningMental Health
SF-12 Composite scoresPhysical HealthMental Health
Life satisfactionMedical History
Diagnosed medicalconditionsPhysical symptomsInfluenzaUpper respiratory infectionSleep problems
Control variablesGenderAgeIncomeOther demographicsBalanced Inventory of DesirabilityResponding
Self-deceptionImpression Management
Neuroticism
The Questionnaire
BioMRS Clinical assessment ofBiometrics
height, weight, body fat (bioimpedance), waist/hip, B/PPhysical performance including
gait, balance, grip strengthCognitive performance
California Verbal Learning Test—over 20 indicators includingShort and long-delay recall, semantic clustering, primacy andrecency, total learning slope, total response bias, intrusions
Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)Blood, Saliva and urine including:
Stress—Waking salivary cortisol, urinary norepinephrine &epinephrineMetabolism—HbA1c, Plasma AlbuminInflammation Markers—Plasma IL-6 & C-reactive proteinLipid Profile —Total and LDL cholesterol, TriglyceridesCreatinine clearanceAdditional blood and urine samples frozen in liquid nitrogen
AHS-2 linked dataAHS-2 questionnaire (collectedup to 3 years before PsyMRS)
EthnicityEducation: self & parentsOccupationDietExercise & Napping: Week day,Saturday, & Sunday“Female History”Sun exposureAge at baptism, mother’s &fathers religionRearing history (who did it &why)
BiennialhospitalizationquestionnaireMortality
Samples of possible analyses
Proposed in grant application
The lifestyle/stress model
HealthyHealthyLifestyleLifestyle
PhysicalPhysicalQuality ofQuality of
LifeLife
ReligiousReligiousAttendanceAttendance
PerceivedPerceivedStressStress
+ +
+
– –
Prayer and Quality of Life
LifeLifeEventsEvents
+
+
–
–
ComCom--passionatepassionate
PetitionPetition
PetitionPetitionfor selffor self
ConfessionConfession
Meditation/Meditation/ImprovementImprovement
OptimismOptimism
PerceivedPerceivedStressStress
PhysicalPhysicalQuality ofQuality of
LifeLife
Interactions:Interactions:Habit withHabit with
CompassionateCompassionatePetition &Petition &PetitionPetition
Interactions:Interactions:Habit withHabit with
ConfessionConfession& Meditation/& Meditation/ImprovementImprovement
+ +
+
+
+
+
––
Some possible biological associationsPhysicalPhysical
PerformancePerformance
AllostaticAllostaticLoadLoad
CongregationalCongregationalSupportSupport
PerceivedPerceivedStressStress
++
+
–
–
CortisolCortisol
HgA1cHgA1c
MentalMentalPerformancePerformance–
––
LifetimeLifetimetraumatrauma
+++
ILIL--66CC--reactivereactiveProteinProtein
Characteristics of the Sample
Compared to the General Social SurveyDavis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2007).
General Social Surveys, 1972-2006. Chicago, IL:National Opinion Research Center.
Gender & Ethnicity
Education
Marital Status
Age
Church Attendance
Prayer Frequency
Physical and Mental Health
Compared to national norms for theSF-12 version 2
Composite Physical Health (SF-12)Self Report
35
40
45
50
55
60
35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 > 74
Age of Female
Scal
e Sc
ore
35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 > 74
Age of Male
U.S. Norm (n = 2,298)Black SDA (n = 819)White SDA (n = 2,043)
U.S. Norm (n = 3,343)Black SDA (n = 2,231)White SDA (n = 3,544)
Composite Mental Health (SF-12)Self-Report
3535 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 > 74
Age of Female
40
45
50
55
60
Scal
e Sc
ore
35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 > 74Age of Male
U.S. Norm (n = 3,347)Black SDA (n = 2,231)White SDA (n = 3,544)
U.S. Norm (n = 2,297)Black SDA (n = 819)White SDA (n = 2,043)