the botswana development model since 1966: evaluation of diversification efforts. what worked? what...

16
THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th August, 2014

Upload: hilary-holland

Post on 03-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T?

Keith Jefferis

BIDPA/UB/FES Conference

27th August, 2014

Page 2: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Diversification Policy

Diversification a long-standing policy objective

Initial dependence on cattle/beef From mid-1970s – dependence on minerals Concerns about

conventional mineral economy dependence, limited direct job creation etc.

Dutch Disease – squeezed non-mining tradeables sectors

post-mineral sources of growth

Page 3: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Measuring Diversification

No single, agreed definition. Focus on sustainability & living standards

Structure of GDP & sources of GDP growth – sectoral diversification – but more diversification may just reflect declining minerals

Fiscal diversification – sources of revenue Export diversification – balance of payments

sustainability Employment, living standards, poverty and

income distribution

Page 4: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Policies to promote diversification Macroeconomic policies

Exchange Rate Policy Monetary Policy Reserve accumulation Invest mineral revenues

Labour market policies Minimum wage Wage compression Immigration

Page 5: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Policies to promote diversification Early sectoral/subsidy schemes

FAP ARAP, ALDEP Industrial Development Policy (1984, 1998)

Institutions BDC, NDB TIPA

Parastatals WUC, BPC, BTC, BHC, BMC, BAMB

Page 6: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Later policies to promote diversification

Macroeconomic policies Exchange rate – largely unchanged Monetary – positive real interest rates

Institutional proliferation CEDA, BEDIA, IFSC, BITC, BNPC

Labour market Wage decompression Restrictive immigration policy

Industry Citizen economic empowerment, EDD

Page 7: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Does mining dominate GDP? No longer

1974

/75

1980

/81

1986

/87

1992

/9319

9720

0320

090

10

20

30

40

50

60

Min

ing

perc

en

t of

GD

P

1974

/75

1980

/81

1986

/87

1992

/9319

9720

0320

0960%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

Ind

ex o

f D

ivers

ifica

tion

Mining share of GDP Index of Diversification

Page 8: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Changing Structure of GDP: Non-mining GDP has changed from ag/mfg to services

1974

/75

1980

/81

1986

/87

1992

/9319

9720

0320

090

10

20

30

40

Ag+Man/GDP

Ag+Man/GDP

Perc

en

t

1974

/75

1980

/81

1986

/87

1992

/9319

9720

0320

0905

101520253035404550

Serv

ices

(Perc

en

t of

GD

P)

Agric + Manufacturing Services (non-govt)

Page 9: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Drivers of Growth

1974-84 1984-94 1994-04 2004-13-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Mining Ag, mfg & constrServices GovtAverage growth

Mining no longer driving growth

But growth has been declining

Page 10: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Fiscal Diversification

Minerals30%

SACU32%

Non-min-eral in-

come tax19%

VAT12%

Other7%

Minerals no longer the largest source of fiscal revenues – so less dependence

But “domestic” revenues still relatively low

Government activities and popular expectations built around higher revenues than will be sustainable in future

Page 11: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Export Diversification

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Other manufacturesMeatTextilesSoda ash/saltGoldPolished DiamondsRough DiamondsCopper/nickel

Exports less dependent upon rough diamond exports than in the past But this is due to exports of polished diamonds (does this mean more

diversification?) Non-mining exports lower (as %) than any time in the last two decades

Page 12: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Export Diversification

Copper/nickel9%

Rough Di-amonds

58%Polished

Dia-monds14%

Gold1%

Soda ash/salt

1%

Textiles1%

Meat2%

Other manu-

factures8%

Services6%

Exports (unlike the economy) has a small contribution from services Although data

on services exports are very poor

Structure of Exports, 2013

Page 13: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Export intensity of different economic sectors

Agriculture

Mining

Manufacturing

Constr., water & elec.

Govt

Services

0% 10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Exports VA

Share of totalNB manufacturing in-cludes polished dia-monds

Key sustainability problem Structure of

the economy is shifting

Moving from tradeables (exports) to non-tradeables (services)

Must promote services exports (and better data)

Page 14: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Unemployment & Poverty

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CensusHIES/CWISLFSDSMISBAIS

Perc

en

t of

lab

ou

r fo

rce

Unemployment stubbornly high Rate of job

creation too low Poverty and

inequality very high by standards (upper MICs)

Have not yet achieved participatory growth

Page 15: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

Future Challenges: Export or Die! GDP and government budget much less dependent on minerals

than 20 years ago Diversification – yes, but not sustainable diversification In many respects, the challenges remain the same as in the

early 1980s: Employment creation Developing non-mining exports Poverty alleviation and participatory growth

But the environment is now more challenging: Closer to the end of diamonds Expectations/dependence on government “Financial cushions’ (fx reserves & govt savings) being depleted Economy much more dependent on services – but we hardly export Many policies have been tried, but most have not succeeded Importance of exports and competitiveness not sufficiently

appreciated

Page 16: THE BOTSWANA DEVELOPMENT MODEL SINCE 1966: EVALUATION OF DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS. WHAT WORKED? WHAT DIDN’T? Keith Jefferis BIDPA/UB/FES Conference 27 th

The Key Diversification Challenge

Moving from an economy based on windfall income –

well managed, but unearned – to one where income and wealth are

based on competitiveness, efficiency and productivity.