the built environment, traffic safety and travel choice

45

Upload: congress-for-the-new-urbanism

Post on 02-Jul-2015

892 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Dr. Norman Garrick, of the University of Connecticut's Center for Transportation and Urban Planning, on street connectivity and public safety.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 2: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Davis, CA14 % of people ride to work

Page 3: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Davis, CA

Road Fatality Rate: 1 per 100,000

Page 4: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Road Fatality Rate for All 157 California Cities Over 40,000

number per 100,000 population

0.0

17.3

Page 5: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Road Fatality Rate for All 157 California Cities Over 40,000

number per 100,000 population

Page 6: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

. Norman W Garrick

Page 7: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 8: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Risk of Fatality

(Fatalities as % of Injuries) California Cities of 40,000 to 120,000

Page 9: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 10: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Adapted from Stephen Marshall

Pre-1950’s Post-1950’s

Evolution of the Street Network

Page 11: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 12: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 13: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 14: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

FHA Technical Bulletin No. 7 (1938)Planning Profitable Neighborhoods

Page 15: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

According to the FHA the grid layout was

MonotonousHad Little CharacterUneconomicalPosed Safety Concerns

Page 16: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Street network, safety and sustainability in 24 medium sized California cities

Cities selected to represent a range of traffic safety level

Page 17: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 18: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Shape and Configuration

Network Scale

Network Connectivity

Page 19: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Citywide Street NetworkN

eigh

borh

ood

Stre

et N

etw

ork Linear Tree Grid

Tributary Radial

Grid

Tree

Adapted from Stephen Marshall, Streets & Patterns

Page 20: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

550 Intersections per Square Mile

Network Scale

Page 21: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

110 Intersections per Square Mile

Network Scale

Page 22: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

45 Intersections per Square Mile

Network Scale

Page 23: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Link-to-Node Ratio = 1.61

Link-to-Node Ratio = 1.13

Link-to-Node Ratio = 1.16

Network Connectivity

Page 24: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Street Network Properties

Street Design PropertiesAverage Total Number of LanesAverage Outside Shoulder WidthRaised MedianPainted MedianOn-Street ParkingBike LanesRaised Curbs

Travel and Activity Level

Distance from City Center

Income

Mix of Land Use

Variables included in Our Safety and Travel Choice Models

Page 25: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Safety Analysis Based on Geo-coding 230,000 Accident Recordsin 24 California Cities

Page 26: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Safety and Travel Choice Analysis done for 1040 Census Block Groups 24 California Cities

Page 27: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Travel Choice Based on Census Data1040 Census Block Groups, 24 California Cities

Page 28: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

versus

Page 29: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

versus

SafetyRisk of Severe Injury or Fatality

Chance of being Severely Injured

30% Higher

Chance of being Killed

50% Higher

Page 30: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Odds of Dying in a Road Accident based on Intersection Density

1 in 200

1 in 500

Page 31: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Percentage of People Walking, Biking or Taking Transit

Page 32: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Percentage of People Walking, Biking or Taking TransitEffect of Intersection Density for Cul-de-sac Network

Page 33: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Percentage of People Walking, Biking or Taking TransitEffect of Intersection Density for Gridded Network

Page 34: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Evolution of Network in California Cities

Page 35: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

Norman W. Garrick

11 X

2 X

Page 36: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 37: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

. Norman W Garrick

Sustainability Gap

USA

Norway

Daily Miles TraveledFor every man, woman and child

Page 38: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 39: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 40: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 41: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

28,000

14,000

8,000

Page 42: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 43: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 44: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice
Page 45: The Built Environment, Traffic Safety and Travel Choice

15,000

11,000

14,000

11,000